Quantcast
Channel: VICE CA
Viewing all 38002 articles
Browse latest View live

Is Obedience the Only Way to Avoid Police Brutality?

$
0
0

Activists in front of the California African American Museum in Los Angeles, California. All photos by the author

“Maybe you shouldn’t just be obedient,” Reginald Jones-Sawyer, Sr. told the crowd. Instead of just teaching children to be meek and compliant with law enforcement, “maybe we should start teaching our young sons to ask for IDs—ask them to remember names and badge numbers" when they're stopped by police. Maybe we should all be more vigilant, he said.

“When you see our young people stopped, you stop and start recording what you see," he said. Let members of law enforcement know that their every move will be scrutinized. "Obviously," though, "with the flash off"—the police don't need another excuse to shoot.

I didn’t expect Jones-Sawyer, a Democratic member of the California State Assembly, to sound like such a firebrand when I first showed up to the hearing on police violence organized by the California and Hawaii chapters of the NAACP. He’s a politician and his job is to legislate, to diffuse community anger over out-of-control police by channeling it into non-binding resolutions and stern floor speeches. But speaking to me in the lobby of the California African American Museum in Los Angeles—after I assured him I do not work for a porn site—he said that what he really wants to do is “start a grassroots effort to combat [police brutality].”

Perhaps he wanted to reduce the expectation that one can solve the persistent problem of police violence against communities of color through the electoral system. To me, though, it sounded as if he was genuinely disturbed by the recent spate of police killings of unarmed black men, from Michael Brown in Ferguson, Missouri, to Ezell Ford and Omar Abrego in LA. It’s time, he said, for communities of color to go on the offensive.

“Right now, we’re acting like victims,” Jones-Sawyer told me. Indeed, he taught his own children to be passive around police to stay alive; to keep their hands at “ten o'clock and two o'clock on the steering wheel, look forward, don’t make any sudden moves.” But one day, he said, his oldest son challenged him: "Why's the responsibility on us to not get beaten and killed by police? Shouldn’t it be on the police to stop brutalizing us?"

His answer was glib, but not wrong: "Because you could die." But it did get him thinking.

“We need to stop that victim mentality and be more aggressive,” he now believes. That means not just teaching kids to be compliant, but to be vigilant; to not be meek in the face of injustice, to not stand by while a member of the community is victimized by members of law enforcement, so that “it becomes very difficult [for police] to behave that way”—so that they “know that the repercussions are going to come immediately, from anybody.”

“I don’t want to see another African-American father coming to a mic almost in tears because he’s had to train his son to be submissive during a traffic stop and he still gets arrested—and he still has a record,” he said.

LAPD Inspector General Alex Bustamante testifies at the hearing.

There were plenty of tears at the September 12 hearing on “Solutions to Police Brutality,” as Jones-Sawyer, members of the NAACP national board, and fellow Assembly member Steven Bradford heard testimony from people of color who said they have experienced firsthand the brutality of local police. A young Latina woman, for instance, spoke of an officer slamming her head against a wall and then jamming his knee in her back, leaving her with five slipped discs over what was a false arrest—one she was later charged with resisting.

Film producer Charles Belk recounted how, after dining at a restaurant in Beverly Hills, police there mistook him for a bank robber and arrested him while he was walking to his car. Despite his innocence, Belk had to spend thousands of dollars on legal fees to get that arrest off his record, which Assemblyman Jones-Sawyer told me has him considering introducing legislation to eliminate the cost of expunging a potentially career-killing false arrest.

“Officers used me as a punching bag,” another man testified. “This happened on the front lawn of my own home. It felt as if my innocence was taken,” he recalled. “How many times is this going to happen to us young black men before we as a community do something about it?”

One mother started sharing a similar story involving her son being brutalized, but wiping tears from her eyes, lost her voice 30 seconds in.

The stories painted a picture of LA police gone wild, but they were all anecdotes, and ultimately, apologists for police brutality could dismiss them as such. Unfortunately, hard data on police violence is hard to come by—and not knowing the full extent of the problem makes it hard to adequately address it, argued Peter Bilbring, a senior staff attorney with the ACLU of Southern California.  “We know precisely how many shark attacks happen in American water,” he told the panel, “but we do not know how many civilians were shot by a United States law enforcement officer.”

So we can only guess. This much, however, is certain: Police in America are shooting to death a lot more people than police in any other developed nation. According to the FBI, there are about 400 “justifiable” police homicides annually in the US, though an effort to compile media reports on officer-involved killings indicates there are more than 1,100 people shot to death by police each year (that’s a 9/11 death toll every three years). In the last year for which there are records, police in Germany, a nation of 80 million, killed all of eight people. In Britain and Japan, with a combined population of 191 million, zero people were killed by members of law enforcement.

An effort to track homicides here in Los Angeles County, meanwhile, found that no criminal organization kills as many people as the police. Since 2000, members of local law enforcement have killed at least 589 people (the Los Angeles Times says 591)—or about one person every week—according to a new report from the Youth Justice Coalition, a grassroots organization run by and for young people of color who have been affected by state violence. Each year, from three to eight percent of all homicides are committed by members of the Los Angeles Police Department or the Los Angeles County Sheriff’s Office—and it’s only been getting worse.

“Law enforcement use of force resulting in death is higher now than when LA had twice many murders,” says the report, based on data from local media and the Los Angeles Coroner’s Office. Though the overall number of murders in 2013 was less than half the number in 2002, police killings—“officer-involved shootings,” in the agency-eliminating words of cops and journalists—rose from 36 to 44, or from three percent of homicides to seven percent. Though they make up less than ten percent of the population, nearly a third of those killed were Black.

The Youth Justice Coalition is petitioning California Attorney General Kamala Harris to appoint a special prosecutor to investigate police violence, arguing that local prosecutors depend too much on the cooperation of police for other investigations to properly investigate police wrongdoing.

That could be a good, practical first step, said Keyanna Celina of the Coalition for Community Control Over the Police, but that’s only a band-aid. What we need is more systemic change, she argued: an all-elected civilian board that can exercise complete control when it comes to hiring and firing members of local police departments, from the sheriff on down. “We want power in the hands of the people."

A lot of people applauded that line.

Follow Charles Davis on Twitter.


VICE Shorts: I'm Short, Not Stupid Presents: 'The Collagist'

$
0
0


I don’t know if you’ve ever had artist’s block, but if it ever comes along just say, “No thanks.” The only solution (which has a success rate of about 7 percent) is to drink coffee, smoke, pace back and forth, sit in front of the desk for hours, and stare off into space until the spark comes back. This is about the point when one starts getting meta and makes a piece of art about struggling to make art. The fact that that move is common means that it too is cliché and usually verges on self-indulgence, but when done right it can be eye-opening—like Federico Fellini’s 8 ½ or M. C. Escher’s Drawing Hands.

There’s an animator named Amy Lockhart who, while collaborating with her partner Marc Bell, decided to address this idea of spontaneous and original creation via a vision board. However, “original” tends to be a misnomer, because creation requires influence and basically anything ever created has been informed, transformed, and combined with something else. That depressing line of nothing’s new anymore is also misrepresentative, too. Despite the fact that 74 percent of studio films released now are sequels, remakes, or adaptations shouldn’t hide the fact that there are still people out there addressing those old concepts in new and interesting ways. Lockhart tackles the artistic process with a double meta approach. In her cut-out paper animation style she portrays Marc Bell sitting at his desk drinking coffee, smoking, and struggling with his his own artworks. The artwork on Marc’s page shuffles, scuttles, blinks, changes, and morphs. The film is a decidedly more simple and lo-fi send-up of the artistic process, but the two-minute short’s light and offbeat spirit hits home in a very familiar way with no pretense. That’s what I want. No bullshit. Just fun, creation, and destruction.

I did a little interview with Amy below, and she’s as silly as her film.  

VICE: Where did this idea come from? 
Amy Lockhart: I've been making cut-out and paper-puppet animations since the ni-ni-ni-nineties. I learned from Helen Hill. I started out making them on 16 mm film on an Oxberry stand—then switched to digital. I use the same set-up, just with a DSLR (digital) camera. I like stop motion because it cuts down on the labor of animation (like drawing every frame), but still allows me to make things with me hands. Also, I get to improvise under the camera while shooting.

The idea came from Marc and me being asked to be resident artists at the California State Summer School for the Arts. So we had to figure out some way to collaborate. This is what we came up with. The hands are traced from his, and also the pens and scissors are all based on his tools of the trade. We both drew the cycled collage bits, and then I animated it. 

Was this fun to make or only fun to see once completed? I can imagine this style of cut-out animation is tedious and painstaking.
This took way longer to complete than it should have because of the nomadic set-up I had. (I could work on it anywhere—so there was no pressure/time crunch—so I didn't work on it...) It was fun to make—other than that. I made up the "story" as I went along, playing with the cut-outs.

Your work does not focus on collage or even the blending of multiple disparate ideas at once. How was it working with Marc in creating something in your style more akin to his work?
It was fun. I am a sucker for the miniature recreations of things. I do work in a lot of different media, so it wasn't that big of a stretch. It's nice to work with someone else and have someone to bounce ideas off of. You don't feel so alone.

Have you ever had an issue with cigarettes burning a painting or artwork? My apartment has poor airflow, and I've accidentally sweated onto a watercolor and ruined a pretty wonderful painting of a person before. 
No. I'm sure a cat's walked on something here or there... I have had paintings that have been lost in the mail—it's a bummer (like the cover of Nog a Dod, a great book on Canadian psychedelia that is edited by Marc Bell...) Sorry to hear about your water color. Such a delicate medium. But I have a funny story: Marc used to live in this place with a cat named Honda who would sashay into his room, look him straight in the eye, then knock over a glass of water with his paw. Dang cat! I believe this did cause the ruination of some drawings and high-quality paper goods.

What are you working on now?
Right now I am working on a feature-length animation with paper puppets and cut-outs. It's called Dizzler in Maskheraid

Watch the trailer:

Jeffrey Bowers is a tall mustached guy from Ohio who's seen too many weird movies. He currently lives in Brooklyn, working as an art and film curator. He is a programmer at the Hamptons International Film Festival and screens for the Tribeca Film Festival. He also self-publishes a super fancy mixed-media art serial called PRISM index.

Comics: Flowertown, USA - Part 19

Why I Stayed in an Abusive Relationship

$
0
0

Illustrations by James Burgess.

Last week, surveillance footage was released that showed ex-NFL player Ray Rice knocking Janay, his then-fiance, unconscious. Unsurprisingly, Rice has been widely condemned for the incident, which took place last year, and indefinitely suspended from the NFL. However, many people have focused on the fact that Janay apologized for “[her] role” in the incident, went on to marry Ray, and has continued to defend his actions ever since.

To an outsider, Janay's behavior seems incomprehensible, which is probably why, over the past week, hordes of domestic violence survivors have taken to Twitter using the #WhyIStayed hashtag to shed light on the emotional sinkhole that keeps victims in relationships with their abusers. Back in 2004, more than 50 percent of people who experienced domestic abuse said they'd be too embarrassed to tell their friends or family. Now, ten years later, hundreds of people are tweeting about it. 

Some have criticized the hashtag for putting emphasis on the victim instead of the abuser, but the fact that it forces us to pay attention to the victim’s experience is exactly what’s so revolutionary about the whole thing. Because when have we ever had the opportunity to hear so much about domestic abuse from the people who've experienced it? 

It’s by listening to the first-hand experiences of victims that we can begin to understand and stamp out abuse. I can’t speak for Janay Rice, or any other victims of domestic violence who stay with their abusers (which is a lot), but until early 2014 I was in a physically and emotionally abusive relationship for two and a half years, and I can talk about why I stayed—and why I left. 

To my mind, asking why I didn’t leave my ex-boyfriend after the first time he physically threatened me is like asking why Truman didn’t leave The Truman Show the first time a lighting fixture fell out of the sky. After it happens, Truman doesn’t immediately conclude that his entire life has been a TV show and make a bolt for the exit at the first hint of something strange. No, he accepts the explanation that’s given to him by sources he trusts. He adjusts his thinking about reality to account for weird objects falling out of the sky and he carries on with his life.

Illustrations by James Burgess.

To me, that first act of violence, just before our first anniversary, was equally as freakish. Abusive people usually don’t become abusive until they know that their partners are going to stick around—for over 50 percent of victims it happens more than a year into the relationship, and often it begins during a couple’s first pregnancy. For me, it was a few nights after we moved in together. When it all starts, the victim is already surrounded by a lifelike TV set of their partner’s making. They’re living deep inside an entire reality constructed just for the two of them.

When Janay Rice wrote on Instagram, “THIS IS OUR LIFE! What don’t you all get,” I remembered exactly what it felt like to believe that the two of you had your own, unique dynamic going on that the rest of the world just didn’t understand. My ex-boyfriend was the first person I loved. I went to new cities with him. I took my first pill with him. We were one of those annoying couples who talk in such a web of in-jokes and memories that our world was totally impenetrable to anyone else. When he sobbed because he felt so disgusted and ashamed that he’d raised a fist to me, I believed I was the only person who understood him well enough that I could make this better.

I was living with a mental curtain drawn because there were certain things that, if I admitted them or examined them for a little too long, would destroy this amazing thing I had going on with someone I believed to be my soul mate. If I forced myself to reflect on whether it could actually have been an accident when my hand was slammed in a door, my belongings broken and my face spat in—or if I had forced myself to relive acts of violence over and over again—I would have had no choice but to accept the truth.

I managed to keep the secret from myself for around 18 months, but over that time it would occasionally bubble up in weird ways. One time I was watching The Wolf of Wall Street and I surprised myself by sobbing like a baby at the scene where Leo DiCaprio punches his wife in the gut. I brushed it off as, like, probably PMS or something, even though I’m pretty sure no one cried during that movie other than me and maybe Jordan Belfort (if he has tear ducts). Another time, it cropped up as a smoker’s paranoia that made me suddenly, overwhelmingly not want to be alone with my boyfriend.

These kinds of incidents were the closest I ever came to admitting, while deep in the relationship, that something might be wrong. It took a threat on my life and the intervention of friends for all these unspoken things to come flooding outwards, and to force me to listen. Forcing myself to relive these moments was the part that really sucked. I went through bouts of PTSD, being kept awake in the middle of the night by surreal flashbacks to things I hadn’t allowed myself to think about since they’d happened.

"Admitting the truth to yourself opens up a long road of psychological fuckery, and it gets a lot harder before it gets better"

There are also practical fears involved in leaving someone who is violent and vindictive. For the majority, the most dangerous part of an abusive relationship is when the victim tries to leave—the fear of what that person might do to you if you try to get out is enough to make most people stay. There's also the fact that victims are often trapped in financial and social binds that mean their money and friends and pretty much everything they have is tied up with their partner.

These were all very real fears for me. My rent doubled when I kicked my partner out, and that was no insignificant part of the pile of shit I had to deal with when, like Truman, I took to my boat and sailed off-set. It meant that despite all the debilitating feelings I was going through, I had to take on as much debt and work as humanly possible so that I could still afford to make my rent. I’m extremely lucky, though, that I wasn’t (or haven’t yet been) one of the 76 percent of women in the UK who experience abuse after leaving. Staying with friends for the initial weeks offered some safety, as did ending the relationship in a packed public place. Under most circumstances that would be a dick move, but in this case it was essential: I had to never be alone with him again. 

None of these steps have been easy, but with each passing day they’re adding up to a life that’s so much easier, and one that’s wholly mine. Somewhere in the midst of phone calls to helplines (some of which are listed, along with shelters, at the bottom of this page), doctor’s appointments for depression and anxiety, moving houses for peace of mind, non-stop work, and all the listening to Lauryn Hill and reading Andrea Dworkin and getting fucking angry, I realized that my decision gave me my life back. I no longer defer to someone else for every decision I make because I’m afraid of them. And that in itself is the best decision I ever made.

Illustrations by James Burgess.

There’s a myth that domestic abuse is the private business of the two people it happens between—no one wants to intervene or witness. I’m calling bullshit on this now. Abuse thrives on the unsaid. A culture that looks the other way is a culture that teaches victims there is no help or respect for them, and that they deserve what they get. I was assaulted in the street by my ex in front of many people, on a few separate occasions, and no one ever said a word. Eyes were averted to the newspaper or the pavement. After incidents like these, a victim feels totally worthless and totally unseen.

So look hard. While Ray and Janay Rice believe that they are “[showing] the world what real love is!”, the #WhyIStayed hashtag is there to show the world what real love is not. We need protest and we need intervention. The more victims who have the opportunity to make sense of what happened to them by talking about it, the better. The more onlookers who learn how to understand, recognize, and call out abuse, the better. But most importantly, if all this discussion means that just one person sees those tweets, or this article—or any of the articles written about the topic—and is moved to speak out about their own abuse, then we're a little bit closer to sorting out this epidemic; and that person will be a huge step closer to living the violence-free life they deserve.

Below is a list of recources that can provide help to anyone living in an abusive relationship: 

National Domestic Violence Hotline: 1-800-799-7233 

Domestic Abuse Hotline for Men and Women: 1-888-743-5754

National Organization for Women 

National Organization for Women NYC Domestic Violence Helpline: 1-800-942-6906

For information on women's shelters in NYC, go to Safe Horizon.

The Socialists Who Think Revolution Will Come When the Aliens Get Here

$
0
0

Photo via Flickr user Vladimir Pustovit

This article originally appeared on VICE Greece.

For generations, communists have been dreaming of a revolution that would destroy capitalism and establish a paradise where the downtrodden workers of the world will finally get their fair share of the money they make for their bosses. That paradise has been unrealized—but maybe that's because aliens haven't shown up to show us the way.

That's what the Posadists believe, at any rate. The organization is named after their founder Juan Posadas, an Argentine Trotskyist who in the 1960s developed an ideology based on the idea that socialists should be using UFOs as political allies.

Posadas, whose real name was Homero Rómulo Cristalli Frasnelli, postulated that a communist movement established under the guidance of alien comrades was a prerequisite for revolution on Earth. He might be one of the more peculiar political theorists that ever lived, but in Argentina his theory was, at least once upon a time, relatively widespread.

To find out more about this obscure movement, I got in touch with the Greek branch of the Posadists, but their response was that they prefer not to talk to the media. So I called up Guillermo Almeyra, who is a professor in the Department of Political Science at the Sorbonne and the former leader of the Trotskyist party in Argentina. He agreed to answer some questions I had regarding Posadism.

VICE: Could you briefly fill me in on the history of Posadism?
Guillermo Almeyra: In 1946, the Trotskyist party—to which the Posadists belonged before they formed their own organization—was the most influential in Argentina. In the beginning of the 1950s, a group formed within that party who seemed to be supporting and trying to impose strange and non-Marxist ideas. Michalis Raptis, a Greek born in Alexandria known by the alias Pablo, left the Party after he was jailed for supporting the Algerian Revolution, and the Posadists followed him to the International Secretariat of the Fourth International (ISFI) in 1953.

In 1959, Posadas got to arguing with the ISFI too, this time over nuclear war—he claimed it was the only way to destroy capitalism. Finally, in 1962, the Posadists completely split with the ISFI and formed [their own] Fourth International.

Guillermo Almeyra. Photo courtesy of Guillermo Almeyra

Did you follow them?
I was a member and one of the leaders of the Trotskyist party. Since 1962, I have resisted Posadism and distanced myself from the movement.

Do Posadists really believe in aliens?
The logic goes as follows: Since there are billions of galaxies with billions of planets in them, there is bound to be [intelligent life] elsewhere. These alien people are communists and want to communicate with more advanced communists—the Posadists.

And how will they bring about socialism?
According to this theory, it is only under socialist conditions that the technology for interplanetary travel can be developed. So the emergence of signs of alien life is connected to the existence of socialism on a different planet. The aliens will plan the revolution on Earth based on their experiences of communism in their planet. This is the absurdity that some of us resisted—some less educated individuals accepted it.

What is the new society that Posadists are fighting for going to look like?
Their vision is actually orthodox: The revolution will destroy the bourgeois state and replace it with a state that will be founded according to the decisions of its workers. The media will be rehabilitated, the economy will be well organized, and exports or trade between countries will be monopolized by the state, as was done in the Soviet Union.

How many Posadists exist in Argentina and the rest of the world at the moment?
I don’t know how many Posadists there are in Argentina, because they are not active. In the past, there used to be a large Posadist following in Argentina. In Europe, the Posadists only appeared after 1968, but the UFOs ideas didn’t develop that much. The Europeans are educated enough not to accept such theories.

The VICE Reader: An Excerpt from John Darnielle's 'Wolf in White Van'

$
0
0

John Darnielle is best known as the guy behind the Mountain Goats, an indie rock icon whose vaguely anguished and kinda pissed-off voice is instantly recognizable. His songs are often carefully constructed narratives full of grim twists and clever turns, so it's maybe no surprise that he's turned toward writing books lately. He came out with a short volume about Black Sabbath a few years back and today his first novel, Wolf in White Van, published by FSG, hits shelves. It's told from the point of view of a man whose face was horribly disfigured in an accident when he was a child and who has since eked out an existence as the inventor of a series of role-playing games he operates by mail. In this section of the novel, the narrator is going to the store while dealing with a lawsuit filed against him by the parents of a couple of kids who died while obsessed with one of his games.

The supermarket is for me what the beach is for other people: it’s eternal. I remember riding there in the car with my mom, once or twice a week every week; that out-of-time hour pushing the cart up and down the aisles, me wandering off to the magazine section when I got bored, always coming back with a copy of Hit Parader in hand. Or Circus. I liked Hit Parader better on principle because it printed song lyrics, but Circus had better stories and a much cooler name. I’d sneak copies into the basket and she’d feign surprise at seeing them when we got to the checkout. Our supermarket outings spanned the years from childhood to adolescence right up until the big change. It was a natural ritual: unscheduled, unchanging, traditional. We’re out of coffee, Sean, do you want to go to the supermarket? Yes. Yes, I do.

So I have to say that I miss shopping. I miss it because it’s something I rarely do for myself at all now, and I miss it even though the thing I miss is not actually shopping, but shopping with Mom, when I was young, before anything happened. Normal adult shopping is something I will never actually do, because it’s no more possible for me to go shopping like normal adults do than it is for a man with no legs to wake up one day and walk. I can’t miss shopping like you’d miss things you once had. I miss it in a different way. I miss it like you would miss a train.

I give a list to Vicky once a week; that’s how I get what I need. Stores where I live are as big as college campuses. But sometimes I’ll get stir-crazy, and I’ll start to resent that I can’t put my life through the same paces everybody else takes for granted. So I’ll go out in the morning, out the door by nine o’clock at the latest, and I’ll substitute the liquor store for the supermarket, since early-riser liquor store shoppers are people who wouldn’t raise their eyes to you if you had a gun pointed at them. Besides which, I have a special place in my heart for the Pomona liquor stores that face the empty boulevards. I grew up in them, kind of: they used to have comic racks.

I needed to stock up on candy. I don’t like asking Vicky to buy as much candy as I actually want to eat; I am ashamed about my candy habit. I will eat it until I feel sick. Once I get to the candy rack I can’t control myself; I buy chewy SweeTarts and Red Hot Dollars, and I buy Magic Colors bubble gum cigarettes, which I like even though they don’t have any actual taste at all. I go home and I eat them all straight from the bag while watching The People’s Court or something, and I make noises like an octopus feeding underwater.

I pulled into the liquor store parking lot in the warm early-summer air and I took one of those big yoga breaths the rehab techs encourage you to take when they think your spirits are sinking. I went in, and I brought a good haul of candy up to the counter, about twenty dollars’ worth. When I paid for it the clerk didn’t even look up. I had a memory as I passed the dirty magazines by the front door, but I tamped it down. I looked away toward the sun still coming up over the Carl’s Jr. across the street.

Coming back around the side of the store to the parking lot, I saw some teenagers hanging out in the bed of a white Toyota pickup. They must have pulled up while I was inside. They were smoking cigarettes in the deliberate self-conscious way of smoking teenagers: two of them, long-hairs. They were also openly watching me as I carried my bag toward the car. People like me prefer teenagers to other people. They are not afraid to stare.

The taller of the two, sandy blond hair and a wispy mustache on his upper lip, popped himself out and over the side of the truck like an athlete landing a long jump, and stopped himself when I’d thought he was going to come directly at me. “Dude!” he said, lifting his head. It was early. I felt good. Usually I ignore the few people who call out to me when I’m in public, but I looked over toward him and lifted my head right back.

“Yeah,” I said.
“Dude, your face,” he said.

***

I read a book called Stardance when I was thirteen years old. It left a big impression on me, though it’s hard to say exactly how, since I don’t remember much about the plot. It had something to do with zero gravity and people dancing in space, maybe in order to communicate something to an alien race. It is probable that when I remember Stardance, I am inventing several details as I go along.

Still, it was Stardance, or my memories of it, the ones I can either access or manufacture, that exploded momentarily in my mind just then as my eyes looked out from under the bulging reconstructed folds of skin that seem to hold them in place. I thought of dancers up in space, trying to stop aliens from enslaving or destroying the earth. I was turning the key in the lock on the car door but it felt like a kind of dancing to me.

“Dude, come here,” said the sandy blond with the mustache. “Not trying to be a dick, just… can I see?” He blew a little smoke and turned his head off to the side as he did it; I saw this as a gesture of deference, of trying to make me see that he wasn’t blowing smoke in my direction. It may have been, though I wonder, that he thought smoke might hurt my skin, which has a fresh-scraped look to it at all times.

Nobody ever asks me if they can look at my face. Except doctors and nurses, I mean. People do look at it, quite often, but usually only if they can convince themselves that I won’t notice they’re looking. They try not to let their eyes stop wandering when they look over in my direction; they pose as if they were surveying some broader scene. I understand, a little, the social dictate to not stare at misshapen people: you want to spare their feelings. You don’t want them to feel ugly. At the same time, though, even before I became what I am, I used to wonder: Isn’t it OK to stare if something seems to stand out? Why not stare? My own perspective is probably tainted by having spent long hours before mirrors after the accident. It would be pretty hard to make me feel “ugly.” Words like pretty and ugly exist in a different vocabulary from the one you might invent to describe a face that had to be put back together by a team of surgeons. My face is strange and terrible. It merits a little staring.

If I were to scream right now, these two would jump straight out of their skins. Just open up my mouth as wide as it will go and start shrieking. Watch them run or freeze in place or just start screaming right back. These urges are still present sometimes. They rise and pop like bubbles on the surface of a bog, and then they’re gone. They don’t trouble me. They are voices from a distant past. “Sure,” I said. I set my bag of candy in the car and I walked across the parking lot toward their truck.

***

We talked for a long time. The guy who’d called me over was named Kevin and his friend was named Steve, and Kevin said the Koreans at the liquor store were known to not card anybody who had a mustache. He slapped a brown bag in his flatbed as he said this and the full cans of beer gave off a muted thunk. I told him that when I was a little younger than he was now, we didn’t even bother to try buying, because the owners knew our parents: we would chug beers off in a corner of the store behind the dusty greeting cards. Steve laughed and said they still had that greeting card rack in there and I told him I knew, that the cards in it were the exact same ones from when I was his age. Kevin offered me a beer. I told him I couldn’t without a straw, and the quiet that fell onto the conversation for the next few seconds was like a great canyon in a desert landscape. Steve reached inside the window of the truck and flipped on the stereo, and the radio came on. It was KLOS. They were playing “Renegade” by Styx.

Kevin crushed his cigarette underneath his shoe and came close enough to me to really get a good look, and he asked me if I was sure this was OK. It would be hard for me to describe how badly I wanted to smile. I could imagine myself in his position, out there on the other side of me, confronted with the scars and the shapes, all the lines that look like they were left on the canvas by a careless or distracted hand. What are we frightened of? Things that can’t hurt us at all. I told him it was fine, it was kind of cool, that most people don’t even ask when you can tell they want to. He looked up from the stretch of former cheekbone he’d been scrutinizing to make eye contact and he smiled, I think because he understood that I was telling him I thought he was brave. Steve stepped up behind him but kept a little distance. Two might have been too many.

But Kevin waved him over and Steve leaned in, and Kevin drew his index finger toward the recessed pit that lies due right of where my old nose was, and he held the tip of his finger near enough to the surface for me to feel his warmth, and said, “Bullet wound?” in a rhythm so casual that I felt like we were old friends, or coworkers, and I corrected him, saying: “Exit wound.” They both gave half-nods and kept craning their eyes around the broad surface before them: down the side, cresting the ear, banking back over above and across the chin, their slowly moving heads like lunar landers.

I got a good look at them while they were circling me as respectfully and surgically as they could: they were a living tableau of denim with some stray silver accents here and there—rings, necklaces. They gave off a vague throb of energy, like thermal images of people on a screen. I recognized that throb. Once I’d held it inside myself, just barely. I felt comfortable with them. So I asked them whether my face freaked them out; I put it exactly like that, because I felt as if I was among members of my tribe. “Does it freak you out, my fucked-up face?” I said.

I don’t really talk like that anymore. Those words, their sound, that summery lilt: all these came from somewhere in the past, or a buried part of the present. Whatever it was—past or present, or unknown future—it seemed to rise from the asphalt like a little invisible cyclone, swirling up around me in my mind. I felt like a panel in a comic book. In a different world, I might have looked like Kevin and Steve instead of like myself. I might have been buying beer and not candy, and smoking Marlboro reds, loitering in the parking lot and waiting for something to happen. The one constant in both possibilities was the liquor store, the parking lot. All roads leading to this quiet, empty place.

Steve answered first. “Well, dude,” he said, and something in his tone made me want to cry for joy, “it is for sure fucked up, your face. But actually it’s freakier before you see it up close. Up close, it’s like…” He wasn’t sure how to finish the thought.

“It’s like tire tread,” I offered.

Among the three of us I thought I felt a kinship. Sometimes I think I feel a bond when it’s only my imagination. I’m used to that. But they laughed about the tire tread comparison, and they lit new cigarettes and offered one to me, which I accepted, and it gave me a head rush so strong that my vision washed out and I saw nothing but pulsing yellow for half a minute, and the song on the radio switched over from “Renegade” to “Even the Losers” as they asked me what was the worst part about having taken a bullet to the face and I said it was actually the way it messes up your hearing, which is true. We had a long discussion then: If you could have your face back or your hearing, you’d take your hearing? Yeah, I’m pretty sure I would. But you can still hear stuff, right? Yeah, but it comes in over a constant throbbing hum that keeps me awake at night sometimes. But seriously? You wouldn’t rather look more normal?

This was Steve’s exact phrase: more normal. It registered with me so suddenly, so immediately. I felt a kind of bliss. I wanted to hold Steve like a child. It’s freakier before you see it up close. It’s like tire tread. It’s like a shag rug. It’s like rope burn scars; it’s like a badly paved road; it’s like bent wheel spokes pressed into taffy. I told him the truth: that I didn’t know; that I didn’t know anymore if I wanted to be more normal or not. I had stopped being normal so early that it was hard to imagine being any other way than the way I was. This was normal for me. As far as I could tell, except on days when something went wrong with the routine, I lived a normal life.

Steve looked at Kevin and Kevin looked at Steve and they both said, “Normal life!” while touching their beer cans together like wineglasses, only at waist level, so that no car going past the tucked-away-between-buildings little liquor store parking lot would be able to see them. You know: in case a cop went past. I understood this right away, at some basic level, without having to ask. And this was the source of my bliss, my total quiet contentment: that we were three people who, if it came down to it, could communicate with one another using only gestures.

***

In the natural course of the conversation I ended up telling them about Carrie and Lance and they asked me if I was going to go to jail. I told them jail wasn’t really on the table, but there was a good chance I’d end up going broke. Kevin told me he sort of knew how I felt, because his mom had kicked him out of the house a while back, and he’d had to sleep in the car until he got up the courage to call his dad. It had taken him a week to do it. He asked his dad if he could stay over at his house until he could save up enough money for first and last and security deposit. He had known that was the most he could ask. His dad didn’t really have any money.

The sun was bright by now. Sometimes you feel like such an old man. For example, when you ask young men what they figure they’ll do with their lives. And you see the look on their faces that says What the fuck are you even talking about, but they’re not saying it to you, they’re bouncing it off each other using a complicated system of facial tics and gestures, which they know they can do because you probably don’t get it. Which is what makes me different: I do get it. I see the gestural semaphore and can read it without having to think twice about it. It is an excruciatingly painful thing to see and feel, so I try to avoid it, but I sensed some connection with Steve and Kevin, so I asked them what they figured they were going to do, you know, after summer, maybe.

Steve said, “Fuck if I know,” and Kevin said, “I’m going to stay as high as I can,” and they bumped fists and then at the exact same moment raised their free hands flat into the air, their palms toward me. They were asking me to give them the high five. I gave them the high five. I felt like the sun had just risen inside me.

“What about you, though, dude?” said Steve. “What the fuck are you going to do?”

I knew what I was going to say; I paused for effect. “I’m going to go home and eat candy and stay high as long as I can,” I said.

Kevin and Steve said staggered No doubts, automatically, reflexively, but then Kevin said: “That whole court thing, though, dude. What are you going to do?” He pulled at his beer.

“Fuck ’em,” I said. When I pronounce the letter f, I spit. Neither of them flinched. I thought a little about Carrie’s parents, to whom I usually bore no particular ill will, because I always try to put myself in the other guy’s shoes. If I had a kid who killed herself because she’d gotten confused about some game she was playing with some stranger far away, I’d hate that stranger, too. That is usually how I think. But I said it again, and I meant it. “Fuck ’em.”

Again Steve and Kevin thunked their beer cans together. “Fuck ’em!” they said, in near unison. I smiled my horrible smile.

Excerpted from WOLF IN WHITE VAN: A Novel by John Darnielle. Published by Farrar, Straus and Giroux, LLC. Copyright © 2014 by John Darnielle. All rights reserved. 

CAUTION: Users are warned that the above work is protected under copyright laws and reproduction of the text in any form for distribution is strictly prohibited. The right to reproduce or transfer the work via any medium must be secured with the copyright owner.

Mélodie Fenez Makes Music Using the Secret Sounds of Plants

$
0
0

Photos by the author

Mélodie Fenez is a French artist who claims she has somehow discovered a way to harness plant sounds and turn them into music. When I first heard about her, I was intrigued and reminded of Václav Hálek, the mushroom composer, who recently passed away. I headed over to her home in Berlin to give it a listen.

Fenez began by poking the naked ends of wires into the leaves of the plants that fill her apartment. Then she handed me a pair of headphones with a cord snaking back to a control panel beneath her fingers. The panel itself was a modified children's toy covered in pictures of farm animals. It used to make barnyard sounds, before Fenez hacked it into an interface between her and the plants. With a deft hand, she began to play the children's toy. Otherworldly clicks, whistles, and wails filled my ears. 

After the performance, I talked with Fenez to get an idea about what I had just heard.

VICE: That was amazing. Where does the sound come from exactly?
Mélodie Fenez: We all have a frequency. You could plug an oscillator into anything alive and it would make a sound. If I made holes in myself and plugging in an oscillator, it would translate the frequency within me to sound. That’s what I’m doing with these plants.

What do you mean when you talk about living things having frequencies?
Well, plants communicate with each other through electronic impulses. That’s what I’m tapping into.

And different plants have different sounds?
Right. Hibiscus, for instance, has a really complex sound. It’s deep. Spiderwort makes a more high-pitched tone.

Are you able to tune them?
My only way of working on the sounds is how I plug in the oscillators. If I plug them into the same leaf, I’ll have a sound that is way more high-pitched than if I plug them into different leaves.

When I heard the sounds change in your music, was that you switching between plants to form the notes?
And combining sounds. But it’s very sensitive. Even breathing can create enough movement to lose a sound. I have to be very concentrated.

Do the plants themselves react to being played?
Eventually they stop making noise and I have to plug the wire in elsewhere.

Why do they do that?
Well, the main predators of plants are worms and little insects. I’m guessing that the plants think the wires are insects, and they send this acid to get rid of the insect. The acid cuts the signal.

I read about an experiment where someone would come into a room and mutilate a plant. Later, when that specific person would return, the other plants in the room would create some kind of warning sound that’s too high-pitched for humans to hear.
I read about that too, actually. The plant could actually remember who harmed it. I have say, at first when I read about how plants defend themselves, I was like, “Oh my god, they react just like me when I’m attacked!” I could really relate to that.

Do they feel what I feel when I’m attacked? That’s really awful. So, for a while I thought, I can’t do this anymore. But then I learned that the hormone plants send when they’re attacked is also the one that makes them grow. A week or two after I’ve played a plant, it flowers like crazy.

Do you feel that you’re forming relationships with the plants?
Totally. 

What are those relationships like?
I check on them very often. I can see what they need. One is really thirsty. Another one is really wild—if you cut it and put it in a glass of water, it will make roots and grow. It’s made to invade the world. It never makes flowers until the day it dies. When it makes flowers, it means that it has no resources anymore and you can do nothing for it—it’s dying. It’s just making flowers to spread around seeds to continue invading.

They have personalities.
They really do. I talk with them.

What do you say?
I thank them when they have flowers, and I ask for forgiveness when I’ve not been nice.

Do they respond back to you in some way?
Yeah, in the way their leaves look and the way they stand. Things like that. I pay a lot of attention to the scars and the leaves, and sometimes the scars get bigger and the leaf dies. Even if the rest of the plant is alive, I’m like, “No, I’m not playing you, this is really harming you.” I can really relate to the way they react. If I was doing this with animals, nobody would want to hear about it or they would insult me. But plants are alive too. 

They don’t have as good of a lobby as the animal lobby.
They need a celebrity.

The way you talk about your plants really makes me feel differently about them. I feel their presence more, and view them almost as characters in this room.
That’s great!  Thank you. That’s what I want to do. I feel like they’re my really good friends. You know how, with a really good friend, you don’t have to talk or interact? You can just be in the same room and there is still a connection. That’s kind of how it is with me and the plants.

Follow Roc’s latest project collecting dreams from around the globe at World Dream Atlas.

Weediquette: Stoned At the Doctor's Office

$
0
0

Photo via Flickr user kmonojo

Everyone has a story about the first time they ever smoked weed, and it usually sucks. The better story is the one about the first time you got really, really high. Most people need a couple of tries before really experiencing it, and the first time it really has an effect is just plain awesome. When I was 15, I had smoked a couple of times and thought I knew what it was to be high, though I probably wasn’t feeling much. I finally got properly stoned at Warped Tour ’99 in Northampton, MA, and it completely wrecked me in the best way. I remember drinking free samples of Yoohoo hand over fist and struggling to walk around on the sea of flattened plastic cups that had formed around the booth. Later that summer, I moved to New Jersey and became stranded in a new town without a weed connect. It wasn’t really a habit back then, so I wasn’t looking for it too hard. It ended up finding me when a random dude gave me a ride home from school, and I got more lit up than I have been since.

I joined stage crew right when school started because it was the only club where you could smoke cigarettes out back and the teacher didn’t give a shit. A former student named Matt, who had to be in his mid 20s, was always hanging out backstage and helping out with stuff. I probably should have been a little creeped out when we offered me a ride home, but I had a doctor’s appointment to catch and my mom would kill me if I were late getting home.

Matt’s truck had townee written all over it. It had racing covers on the seats, a flashy audio head unit, and an eight ball shifter. As I could have guessed, he demonstrated his subwoofers with Korn before pulling out of the parking lot. As he turned onto the road, Matt opened his center console and pulled out a brass one-hitter. “Wanna take a little detour?” he asked. Again, this was a creepy statement, but I was really eager to smoke. How dare I question the intentions of this benign suburbanite offering me weed? I agreed and he turned down a quiet thoroughfare.

Matt loaded up the one-hitter and passed it to me. As I smoked, he perused the CD sleeve strapped to his sun visor. He came upon a selection and yelled. “Let’s bump some Catch 22, dude!” It was most definitely 1999, and I was more in New Jersey than ever. Matt continued loading the brass piece, and I continued to accept his generosity. His weed was insanely good, possibly the best weed I had smoked until that point. I’m sure being 25 and living in the boring suburb he grew up in gave Matt good reason to secure solid trees. Before pulling up to my building, Matt asked if I was OK to talk to my mom. I told him I’d smoke a cigarette and chill for a minute before going up. “Here, take one of mine,” he said, offering me a Marlboro menthol light. I thanked him and he jetted. Now I just had to cool it so I could talk to my mom and oh shit, that doctor’s appointment.

At the tail end of the cigarette, I discovered that I was crazy high. In the quiet apartment complex, I could hear the sound of birds echoing off the bricks and crescendo-ing into a loud, synthetic roar. I sat down on a bench and listened some more, wondering if I could hear the cells regenerating in my ears if I focused enough. After an eternity, my beeper jostled me out of my thoughts. It was my mom. I bolted up the stairs and found her ready to drive me to the doctor’s office. She nudged me right back out of the doorway. Before she closed the door, I bolted back inside to grab a bottle of water. I spotted a massive Costco container of honey-roasted peanuts on the kitchen counter. I grabbed that instead.

All the way to the doctor’s office, I ate the living hell out of those peanuts. As my mom asked me questions about my day, I attempted to respond while stuffing fistfuls into my mouth. When we got there, she told me to leave the peanuts in the car and I refused, shaking my head while chewing. She rolled her eyes and muttered something to herself about how weird I am.

It was my first time seeing that doctor, so I had to fill out a bunch of forms. My mom did most of the writing, but I managed to get honey-roasted crust all over the forms before handing them to the nurse. When they called me in for my checkup, I brought the peanuts with me into the exam room. I continued eating them as the nurse took my vitals. She only asked me to put them down when she weighed me. Finally, the doctor came in and started saying some stuff to me. I barely listened, instead studying the eye chart on the wall and munching on peanuts. I started paying attention as he was finishing up. “You’re fine, just a little underweight. You should eat more,” he said. With a mouthful of half-chewed peanuts, I said, “I’m working on it.” We both laughed and he sent me on my way.

Looking back, I have to question that doctor’s professional skill. Any idiot could have figured out that I was high as shit, and yet not a single person in this office said anything to me about my aloofness and obsessive peanut-eating. And how the hell did my mom not figure it out? I ate a pound and a half of peanuts in the space of 40 minutes right in front of her. Then again, my mom is very unfamiliar with weed, and maybe the doctor knew I was high but didn’t want to blow up my spot. Overall, I’m pretty satisfied with everyone’s response to how stoned I was. Although, I probably ruined honey-roasted peanuts for myself forever.

Follow T. Kid on Twitter


California Lawmakers Want to Limit Police Drones, but Activists Want Them Banned

$
0
0

Anti-drone activists outside City Hall in downtown Los Angeles. All photos by the author

The police hate a bill just passed by California lawmakers, saying it unjustly limits their ability to use unmanned aerial vehicles (UAVs) to fight crime. The Los Angeles District Attorney hates it too, complaining that requiring police to obtain a warrant before deploying a drone to conduct surveillance goes “beyond what is required by Fourth Amendment of the United States Constitution," which the seasoned political observer knows police and politicians are supposed to gut, not exceed.

But there’s another, somewhat unexpected source of opposition to AB 1327, passed last month by the California State Senate: anti-drone activists.

“We are gathered here today to we reject the use of drones by law enforcement under any circumstances,” said Hamid Khan, an organizer with the Stop LAPD Spying Coalition, at a September 15 press conference in front of City Hall in downtown LA. Activists here are particularly anxious about drones since the Los Angeles Police Department obtained two small surveillance UAVs from police in Seattle, who had to give them away in the face of overwhelming public opposition to their use. The drones have not yet been deployed, with Mayor Eric Garcetti promising to seek public input before ever letting them fly.

While the American Civil Liberties Union of California has endorsed the legislation, which would be the state’s first attempt to restrict the use of UAVs—if Democratic Governor Jerry Brown actually signs it into law—Khan argued that “when you look at the actual bill, it has enough waivers and exceptions and loopholes you can actually drive a drone through it.”

The actual bill, on its face, looks like a step in the right direction. Right now, the use of drones by law enforcement is regulated by nothing more than the Constitution, that old, tattered rag. If signed into law, the legislation would prevent police from using UAVs to collect “criminal intelligence” without first obtaining “a warrant based on probable cause.”

But there are details—exceptions to that rule: Police could use drones without court approval in “emergency situations,” including, but not limited to, "fires, hostage crises, 'hot pursuit' situations... and search and rescue operations on land or water.” Drones could also be used “to achieve the core mission of the agency provided that the purpose is unrelated to the gathering of criminal intelligence.”

Some of those exceptions seem perfectly fine; no one really fears drones rescuing people stranded at sea, for instance. And to the ACLU, the legislation overall provides “much-needed judicial oversight” at a time when there is next to none. But some nonetheless fear that if you give a law enforcement agency an inch—if you legitimize the use of drones at all—we will be a mile closer to a future where drones hover outside bedroom windows to ensure marital fidelity.

Also, judicial oversight isn't all it's cracked up to be. In 2010, for instance, the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Court approved every single request it received to monitor an individual's communications. And when police come looking for a warrant from a judge—one they may have already determined is likely to give them one—it's their word against no one's in that courtroom, as suspects certainly aren't given a chance to defend themselves in that setting.

At the press conference, activist Jamie Garcia argued it wasn't so much the LAPD's locked-away drones she feared as the broader trend they represent: “Another step in the further militarization of local police departments, giving them unprecedented amount of power and technology to collect information on our everyday lived experiences.”

Pete White of the Los Angeles Community Action Network likewise decried “the full-scale militarization of our communities by local police,” complaining that the public has been left out of the decision-making progress. “For the record, I do not feel safer with military-grade weaponry and surveillance in my community,” he said. “Actually, as a black Angeleno, I feel in no uncertain terms threatened by such.”

Some in LA also feel betrayed. Though he promised not to take action on drones until the public had its say, Mayor Eric Garcetti came out and endorsed AB 1327 last week. Activists argue that, by doing so, he effectively endorsed a standard for the use of drones by the LAPD, one that the public was never consulted on. In fact, some activists don't want a standard at all: They never want to see a drone in the LA sky, ever, for any reason.

Hamid Khan of the Stop LAPD Spying Coalition speaks to the press

“For us as Angelenos, as a community, this bill has no value at all because we reject the drones under all circumstances,” said Hamid Khan. After the press conference, Khan told me that he and others had been promised a meeting with Mayor Garcetti himself and were told they would hear an actual date for that get-together come September 12. That's the day Garcetti announced his support for AB 1327.

As for the meeting, Yusef Robb, a spokesperson for Garcetti, told me that Khan and other activists already had their chance to talk last month, when they met with the mayor's public safety staff. "This group has already met with the Mayor's office,” he wrote in an email. “The fact of the matter is no decision has yet been made and we're going to ensure that, before one is, a public and transparent process will occur. Until then, these [drones] remain under lock and key, on the ground and not in LAPD possession."

The drones are, however, a step closer to being in hands of local police. On September 15, the Los Angeles Police Commission—the civilian board that oversees the LAPD—announced that, three days before, the city's two drones were taken out of the possession of their federal overseers at the request of none other than the LAPD and transferred to the commission itself. The hand-off was justified "since the LAPD has begun their community outreach and process for drafting of policies and protocols" governing the use of drones, the commission stated, adding that it expects to address the LAPD's proposals in a series of public hearings six months from now.

In the meantime, said Inspector General Alexander Bustamante. “These two vehicles will be secured in my offices, and I will not release them to anyone, including the LAPD, until and unless the commission authorizes their release.”

Follow Charles Davis on Twitter.

NYFW Reviews Wrap-Up: More Like Spring/Bummer 2015

$
0
0

Like clockwork, New York Fashion Week came and went in a swift blur of broken heels, extravagant weirdos, and free party swag. Big fancy designers showcased the same ol' shit uptown while newer, upcoming, and quite frankly, more exciting designers showcased their new stuff downtown. Now that the dust has settled, here's what we saw and whether or not it made us smile or barf. Enjoy!

 

ZANA BAYNE

Zana Bayne is a 20-something-year-old designer and leatherworker whose eponymous fashion house is by all accounts a hit. By tastefully straddling the line between fashion and fetish, her clothing has appeared in many of Vogue's international iterations and has even been worn by famous people like Beyonce and Lady Gaga. Fashion pedigree and celebutante cosigns aside, her work is, if nothing else, empowering—exuding confidence and controversy. 

Sure, its outsider BDSM appeal is somewhat irresponsible and largely derivative but so what? As long as it's being marketed to MILFs in the Hamptons, I'm a happy camper.

—BOBBY VITERI

 

PUBLIC SCHOOL

Judging by the exorbitant number of fashion crows in attendance, this was the show of the season. There was smart clothing for both sexes in black, white, and blue, and that's pretty much all I remember. After being burned at the stake by highbrow fashion editors in ballet flats who thought I smelled like weed (I did), I tripped over André Leon Talley’s moo moo. The glamor of fashion is overpowering, and I want out. 

—JESSE MILLER-GORDON

 

MARK McNAIRY

After seeing only one of Mark McNairy’s shows, you can easily predict what every other season will look like. Camo, daisy print, and beer are just a few hints. With a show titled “Whatever,” it’s clear that Mark doesn’t give a fuck about impressing anyone at Fashion Week. He literally had a shirt that said “Shitty T-shirt” on it because that is just the kind of guy he is and we love it.

The one surprise that Mark throws in every presentation, however, is a celebrity cameo at the end of the show. But, just when we thought we had him figured out, he sent Travis $cott as the first model down the runway. The rapper and producer did the robot before skipping and jumping in a pair of plaid pants and a two-tone bomber jacket. Fashion kids looked startled as they fervently tried to image search who the crazy man was. Thanks to wi-fi, by the time Scott made his final appearance wearing a red plaid shirt and flicking off the cameras, every poser in the audience was his biggest fan.  

—ERICA EUSE

 

HOOD BY AIR

HBA was once again a full-fledged shit show outside, with fans new and old crowding the block outside of Spring Studios. On a production level, the show was far more simple than last season, taking place in a vast expanse of a room with floor to ceiling windows. Not ones to withhold the crowd the over the top shit they've come to expect from HBA, their poster model Boychild walked a confused Great Dane down the runway only a few looks after a young man made his way to the photo pit on HBA crutches. I could tell you how their now familiar silhouettes are being refined in exciting ways and how they’ve moved beyond the long sleeve T-shirt, setting a new status quo for a genre they basically created themselves, but that's not really the point.

—JESSE MILLER-GORDON

 

VFILES SPORTS SHOWCASE (TIGRAN AVETISYAN, HAMM, ZDDZ, DTTK)

Tigran Avetisyan was, by far, the best thing in this showcase. And it's not necessarily because I really liked the 80's L'oreal nod (which I did), but because they're the only ones who bothered with a proper name for their label—unlike the rest of the lot, who thought acronyms would suffice.

That being said, here are my reviews (which can be read in any order) for the other three: SMH, LOL, and FOH.

—BOBBY VITERI

 

ROBERT GELLER

It's a shame that when a lot of dudes on the street talk about Robert Geller, they talk a lot about black. To me, next to his brave silhouettes, Robert's greatest contribution to the way cool dudes are dressing is his use of color. Over the course of his previous collections, he's changed the way I look at colors and how to use them in an outfit. All black has become the de-facto go-to for dudes who are kind of into clothes, which has made the look come off more lazy than cutting edge. On the other hand, too much color can be vulgar and come off as cheap and peacock-y. Instead, Robert has a knack for zeroing in on darker shades of purple and red and navy and placing them in palettes that allow them to pop in a supremely elegant way. The power is in his subtlety and precision. 

With his latest spring/summer 2015 collection, he opted to focus on design for design's sake and eschewed the kinds of narrative threads he's used to build his past few collections. This change up was awesome because as much as I love the stories of previous collections, this new direction allowed him to explore my favorite part of his work and it definitely produced some dope results. There were bright pastels like lilac and beige and the return of his familiar shades of deep red and navy placed onto tops that were extra-long and perfectly tailored slim-cut high waisted pants. Some of the coolest pieces featured a kind of ragged painter's brush pattern on neoprene in two-tones like navy and coral, and mauve and grey. 

There were also a couple of collaborative surprises in this collection. Robert has paired up with Garrett Leight California Optical to make some convertible shades that look like something Mickey would wear in Natural Born Killers. And, most awesomely, the show debuted the latest installment in the the extremely fruitful collab between Robert and Common Projects. This time around, they dropped a luxury slip-on with a Vans-style silhouette and a derby with a zipper closure. The derbies in patent leather were by far my favorite shoes on the runway this Fashion Week. They are pretty flashy with their shiny leather and zipper, but they have a casual spin thanks to their thick sole that reminds me of Red Wing's iconic Postman Oxfords... I think it's time to start selling some Nikes on eBay so my bank account and closet will be ready for those bad boys to drop. 

—WILBERT L. COOPER

 

CHROMAT

Becca McCharen knows how to cage a woman. A week before her show at The Standard Hotel for MADE Fashion Week, she was given four hours to successfully turn Beyonce’s dancers into bondage badasses for her VMA performance. Her new Chromat collection was just as impressive, leaving no body part unbound, from the tip of the model’s ponytails to their toes. Until the show, I never thought I would long to wear an accessory that resembles the reverse bear trap from Saw. I wouldn’t even care if it ripped my face in half at the end of the night.   

—ERICA EUSE

 

JEREMY SCOTT

When it comes to the useless talent of being able to sell people cliché cultural vomit, Jeremy Scott is in a league of his own. On a good day, he'll take the aspects we're fond of, like the Simpsons, and make something we don't hate. On bad days, he'll rape and pillage something sacred like Santa Cruz skateboard designs and get hit with a lawsuit. Running out of shit to rip off, it looks like this is the season where he's finally tripped over himself. 

For his latest collection, Jeremy Scott is literally selling glorified Shrek merchandise. Keeping with the franchise's strict diarrhea-vomit color wheel, comes a $260 denim plaid shirt, a $225 zipper front plaid bra, and a kitschy $120 tie-dye T-shirt that says "SHREK HAPPENS" in the beaten-to-death Vision Street Wear style that looks like something Scott himself wiped his ass with. That wasn't even the most nauseating part—at the end the show he grabbed Miley Cyrus, the poster child for the garbage tweeny-bopper demographic, from the front row and paraded her off the runway. Which is fine as long as long we're all on the same page here: "artist-muse relationship" is just a fancy way of saying "cocaine dependency."

—BOBBY VITERI

 

TELFAR

The philosophy behind Telfar's latest Spring/Summer 2015 collection is "Simplex." Although it sounds like some kind of STD or new mental disorder, it's actually a (quoting the press release here), "construction method in composed of two overlapping half-circles... [sic] " I'm not 100 percent sure what that statement even means, but it sounds pretty smart. And at this point, I've accepted the fact that the Liberian born and Queens raised designer Telfar Clemens has way more brain power than I do. So, I'm just going to roll with it because he always seems to be ahead of the curve. When he first started to portray his label with this fantasy that it was a global mega-brand, it seemed weird. And look at Telfar now, two seasons in at NYFW with glowing reviews coming in from Vogue to VICE and everywhere in between. So I have a hunch Simplex—with it's Kmart meets 90s-era Helmut Lang aesthetic—will catch on... Just hopefully not in my genitals. 

—WILBERT L. COOPER

 

BETSEY JOHNSON

I arrived at the Betsey Johnson show with blood on my shirt and a band-aid on my arm. Thanks to my immune deficiency—which, unfortunately for VICE commenters, is a genetic condition, not HIV—I ended up at the emergency room. But the doctors discharged me around 12:30, allowing me to rush to Betsey Johnson’s prenup-themed show. I felt like shit, and I worried I’d witness a shitshow because Johnson has faced financial difficulties in past years. Her last runway show looked like Lisa Frank’s cocaine-fueled vomit. I wasn’t shocked when the show started with two sexy twinks walking down the aisle (read: runway) in matching wedding jackets. (One jacket said “pre” on the back in sparkly letters, and the other said “nup.”) Johnson’s sales pitch might've been “edgy” for a 76-year-old woman, but it was pretty tame to me... That is, until the twinks started making out on the runway.
 
Against a song that included the lyrics “I won’t grow up,” the other models continued breaking standard conventions. Instead of stealing downtown drag queen’s looks and tossing them on anorexic girls who sell the gowns to middle-aged store owners and Johnson’s lesbian fans, Johnson hired drag queens and butch girls to model her clothes. But one model eclipsed the queens: the former Real Housewife of Beverly Hills, Camille Grammer. Grammer’s life has sucked the last few years. She divorced her husband Kelsey, a.k.a. Fraiser, and survived cancer. But I forgot all of that when I saw Grammer dance in Johnson’s skimpy wedding gown and flashy gold necklace, with smeared makeup around her eyes. She looked like a woman who discovered how to act like a teenager at age 46. Besides attracting press attention, the antics of the drag queens and reality stars showcased how Johnson is more than a woman who creates material for gay tabloid reporters who love camp. She’s a genius who can make cancer survivors look as sexy as Kate Moss and make sick people forget their health issues for 10 minutes with the power of her short runway shows.

—MITCHELL SUNDERLAND

 

PATRIK ERVELL

Patrik Ervell is a tinkerer. He came into the game with a very clear vision and approach and he's been perfecting it and polishing it ever since to increasingly great results. When he drops a new collection, it's not about reinventing silhouettes for men. Instead, it's about making the classics even better by using the latest innovations in fabrics and materials. Fittingly, spring/summer 2015's theme was "World of Interiors"—building on the idea that interior design moves at a much more sustainable, functional pace than fashion. Instead of being pushed forth by trends that come in as quick as they fizzle out, interiors are about durability and longevity. This is a concept that has always been close to the Patrik Ervell ethos for menswear, but this season put this idea front and center with a collection that focused on basics updated with exciting new materials. My favorite looks of the collection featured outerwear pieces made of transparent nylon, vented track pants made of polyurethane, and that tough calfskin racing leather jacket that closed the show. However, the piece I hope to be wearing next spring is the zip-up flight jacket in jade fluted silk. It's cut like something out of Red Tails, but it has an extraordinary sheen. It's the perfect encapsulation of Patrik Ervell—classic silhouette with a forward thinking design.  

—WILBERT L. COOPER

 

N. HOOLYWOOD

For a couple of years, I was thoroughly convinced that Daisuke Obana, the guy behind Japanese concept label N. Hoolywood, could send anything down the runway and I'd quickly scarf it down and ask for seconds. His MO is pretty much taking a certain era of classic Americana that we take for granted—like prohibition mafiosos and Marlboro man cowboys—and giving these looks (that have since been abandoned and left to die on costume store shelf) the much needed Japanese revisit they deserve.
 
Unfortunately for his latest season, Obana decided to appropriate the year 2099, an era where Teva sandals and digi-camo worked so well the first time around, that they were in desperate need of a remix.

—BOBBY VITERI

 

ØDD

If you don’t know anything about fashion, you could easily throw on one of ØDD’s runway looks and appear like you belong frontrow at a show. Sure, the geometric cuts and subdued colors can resemble a prison uniform or a comfy pajama set, but that is part of the appeal. The collection is about feeling sexy in clothing that isn’t super revealing. So now, if my boyfriend gives me shit about wearing house clothes in public, I will tell him they’re designer. 

—ERICA EUSE

 

ECKHAUS LATTA

Eckhaus Latta always incorporate their elaborate humor and intelligence into their work, and this show was no different. And a children's choir, busty models, sock wedges with built-in woven socks, and heads of lettuce on the runway is testament to that. These weirdos are only getting better.

—JESSE MILLER-GORDON

 

VISVIM

A lot of my #menswear buddies who write and blog or design and promote fashion have always hyped up visvim to me. visvim holds this rarefied place among dudes who are into clothes because of designer Hiroki Nakamura's relentless pursuit to make garments that spare no expense and make no compromises in terms of quality and craftsmanship. Past seasons have featured sweaters dyed with the colorful remains of the Cochineal insect—it takes 80,000 of them to make one kilogram of dye, a $30,000 robe made of tree bark, and a teepee tanned with buffalo brains. The brand has been doing crazy stuff like this for like 13 years. It came out of Japan's Ura-Hara movement, along with labels like Bathing Ape. But like a lot of people in the US, it really came to my attention when famous guys like Kanye West and John Mayer started rocking it and style sites like Complex stared pumping it up. 

So, when I got the invitation to check out the brand's latest Spring/Summer 2015 collection, I was beyond stoked. The collection was presented at Industria Studios in Manhattan's Chelsea neighborhood. It had a 50s greaser meets Hawaiian kitsch theme. I know that sounds far-fetched at first, but all-American bad boys back in the day were obsessed with Hawaii—just listen to the tiki-torch slide guitar at the opening of Hank Williams "Your Cheating Heart" for proof. 

A lot of the clothing and shoes were new versions of the brand's staples that I'd seen online—like their famed FTB moccasins, gorgeous leather outwear, and button-down shirts with eccentric flourishes. But you can't really get visvim by looking at the clothes in pictures over the internet. You have to touch and feel them to understand why a lot of dudes go bonkers for the brand and are willing to pony up for their hefty price tag. After seeing the stuff for myself, I'm definitely a fan. For this collection, Hiroki did some pretty crazy stuff like make some shirts out of pineapple fibers to support the Hawaii theme. Not to mention all of the embroidery and graphics were sewed and painted by hand by remote artisans who've been painstakingly making garments the same way for centuries. 

There were very few people checking out the collection when I was there, but those who were present were heavy hitters like Nick Wooster, William Yan, and Lynn Yaeger. They also had all kinds of fancy little goodies on deck, too—like chocolate strawberries, lemonade, and brownie-cakes—which was dope. Hiroki Nakamura was there, too, talking to some of the guest about the collection with a great fervor. In addition to the clothes and food, they had this old antique car there that looked like something out of American Graffiti. It was very weathered by time, and everyone was wondering if it could still even run. When prodded, Hiroki, got inside and revved the bad boy up something fierce. It was an awesome moment that spoke to ethos behind his brand, which eschews modern production techniques for methods that are often seen as outdated. visvim's gorgeous garments and unparalleled craftsmanship is reminder that back in the day, they did things the hard way for a reason. Like that classic car, I bet these new visvim garments will be making cool dudes happy for a long time.

—WILBERT L. COOPER

 

MARIA KE FISHERMAN

The braids, the vinyl, and the zip-up knee-high boots—it was all so good. Maria ke Fisherman delivered their second solid collection of pleated miniskirts, cropped jackets, and mesh tops for MADE Fashion Week at The Standard Hotel. Maria Lemus and Victor Alonso have successfully transformed the 90s cyberpunk style of the weirdo tech kids hanging out in the dark abyss of Hot Topic, into a sexy badass look that fashion kids are drooling over. The only downside of the presentation is that more people are going to wish they had crammed in there to see it.

—ERICA EUSE

 

THE BLONDS

How the Blonds can get Paris and Perez Hilton in the same room and still be Fashion Week's best-kept secret is beyond me.

 

—BOBBY VITERI

Manchester Eggs and Pig Stomach: Frat House Chef

$
0
0
Manchester Eggs and Pig Stomach: Frat House Chef

Canadian Cannabis: The Cult of Marc Emery

$
0
0

Marc Emery is commonly known as the 'Prince of Pot,' which is a title he got from years of pot activism and, of course, pot smoking. Beyond his protesting, which got him arrested more than a few times, Marc Emery was a successful weed-seed seller, which became a lucrative business quite quickly. His cash flow got him noticed by the DEA, who extradited him from Vancouver to the US, where Marc was sentenced to five years in prison. 28 hours after his release, VICE's Damian Abraham went to meet up with Marc at his welcome home party in Toronto. We also met with his co-accused, 'Marijuana Man,' and his wife Jodie, back at the Cannabis Culture HQ in Vancouver. This is the Cult of Marc Emery. 

The Problem With Transparency Reports? They're Not Very Transparent

$
0
0
The Problem With Transparency Reports? They're Not Very Transparent

We Spoke to the Londoners Who Think Scotland Should Stay in the UK

$
0
0

Turns out Londoners love Scotland. They have no reason not to, of course, but I didn’t realize the extent of the affection until I arrived at yesterday’s Let’s Stay Together event in Trafalgar Square in the ciy's center. Thousands of Scottish expats and people really into waving mini flags had gathered to have their voices heard in the lead up to Thursday’s vote, when Scots will vote on whether or not to stay in the United Kingdom. The crowd was pretty unified in its sentiment: Vote No.

The polls have tightened dramatically since last week, rendering Thursday’s outcome far too close to call. Prime Minister David Cameron, Deputy P.M. Nick Clegg, and opposition (Labour Party) leader Ed Miliband have all hurried on up to Scotland in a last-ditch effort to save the Union, while Scottish First Minister Alex Salmond—a driving force behind the independence push—has kept himself busy flying around the country on the campaign trail. He's been accusing the BBC of political bias and questioning England's promise of more powers for Scotland in the event of a No vote. Meanwhile, the UK Independence Party—which wants Britain to leave the EU—held a weird press conference in a bid to keep the family together.

The Let’s Stay Together campaign is backed by a bunch of English TV stars who were popular in the mid-2000s and aims "to give a voice to everyone who doesn’t have a vote in the decision to break up Britain." Comedian Eddie Izzard and historian Dan Snow were there yesterday giving speeches to a hugely enthusiastic reception. 

According to the polls, English people "overwhelmingly want Scotland to stay in the UK." However, those poll results weren't accompanied with sound bites explaining everyone's reasoning, so I had a walk around last night's rally and asked some people why Scotland is their BFFL.

VICE: What brings you here?
Tim:
Despite my confusing accent, Scotland is my home. I spent the majority of my life there, but I decided to come to university in England because I didn’t get into any universities in Scotland. I’ve come during a time of a referendum, so basically I can’t vote.

That's not great. How do you feel about that situation?
I feel a little bit disenfranchised. I want to do my bit, and being here is all I can do. Edinburgh is my home and I don’t want to lose it. Britain is also my home. They’re both part of me. 

Do you reckon you’ll move back to Scotland?
Like I say, Scotland—Edinburgh—is my home. However, the Scotland I’m seeing at the moment isn’t my home. This referendum has opened a Pandora’s Box of the very worse characteristics of nationalism. I’ve been in Scotland a lot recently and it’s revealed a dark underbelly of society.

What are your views on Alex Salmond?
He’s a dreadful, horrible man. He bullies and puts people down, like when he speaks in Parliament. Anyone who disagrees with him he accuses of scaremongering. These are all the hallmarks of a dictatorial mind. I’m not a fan.

Hi Tom, why are you here today?
Tom Brake, MP and Deputy Leader of the House of Commons: I think we’re better together. I would hate for the friends I’ve got in Scotland to be separated from the UK. There are so many reasons why Scotland is better as part of the UK. The government has already made a commitment to give further powers to Scotland, so I think they can get the best of both worlds. They can have greater responsibility in taxes and benefits, but at the same time be a part of the UK, which has a really important global presence.

Many might be voting for independence because of the cuts your government has implemented.
Well, of course one of the issues Alex Salmond has made during this campaign is the alleged privatization of the National Health Service (NHS). Alex Salmond already has responsibility for the NHS; he could privatize it if he wants to. The government is offering more powers. And then it will be down to the government in Scotland to decide the levels and quality that they want to provide.

How do you think (Deputy P.M.) Nick Clegg has done in keeping the Union together?
I think all the party leaders have just grabbed it by the scruff of neck. I think that, until now, Alex Salmond has had it a bit easy. He’s been pulling the emotional heartstrings on this. But I think those who support Scotland staying in UK have started to respond more aggressively. The fact that Scottish businesses employing 40,000 people saw £3 billion (amost $5 billion) wiped off their value because of separation means things are swinging back in our direction.

Hi Will. Why are you here today?
Will:
I want to express that I don’t want Scotland to leave the Union. I think we’re better together. It’s all a load of rabble-rousing nonsense. We can adapt to what Scottish people want. I share a lot of the political views that Scottish people are expressing, and it’s frustrating. I want to work with them to make everything better.

You say you share political views with people in Scotland. Would you vote yes if you lived there?
I don't think I'd vote yes, because I think that Scotland is going to be a worse country to live in than now. I think that a lot of the campaigning has been very negative. I'd hope that if I was in that country I wouldn’t be listening to stuff like that. 

What do you like most about Scotland?
Are you trying to make me say something that a Londoner would say, like "the Edinburgh Festival"? Well, I do like the Edinburgh Festival.

Glad to hear it. Cheers, Will.

So you reckon Scotland should stick with Britain?
Naomi (on the right): I'm Scottish and my parents are English. But essentially I feel we are stronger together.

I take it from your poster you don’t like Salmond?
I think it’s important not to get tied up in personalities. Saying that, I don’t trust him and I don’t think he has answered enough questions. He’s been very manipulative.

Do you trust politicians in London?
I have to say, it’s looking kind of bleak. I wouldn’t say there’s a huge amount of faith, but hopefully this campaign can show that changes need to be made all over.

Who do you think is going to win?
It’s very close, but I feel that the No campaign will succeed.

@ChrilesGiles

More on the Scottish independence referendum:

The Orange Order Marched to Save the Union On Saturday

How Radical Are Scotland's Radical Independence Coalition?

UKIP Held a Weird Press Conference to Stop the United Kingdom From Separating 

Is East London's New Death Row Pop-Up Restaurant for Real?

$
0
0

The homepage of the Death Row Dinners website

Like your parents' marriage, death row is losing its romance with every passing day. A few hundred years ago it was princes and queens being held in giant towers as they waited for death, like something from a bloody fairytale. And that was fine; all part of the social contract. Cutting the heads off the formerly powerful in front of baying crowds with a massive sword was the kind of justice that made sense in a time of disease, poverty and chucking your own shit and piss out the window. Even in the days of Bundy and other big American serial killers there'd be an electrifying pay-off; evil men being riddled with lightning till their eyes burst open like dawn slugs, but we can't even rely on the States for our execution kicks any more. What's that you're offering us? A painfully slow criminal holocaust carried out by a state that doesn't even know where to get proper death drugs? Where's the fun in that?

I'm joking, of course. Any progressive person would agree that the death penalty is always the wrong answer. In most parts of the world, it has more or less been decided now that executing people for crimes they did or did not commit is very much "not on." It's a disgusting, pugilistic, and frankly pretty deranged way of dealing with the problems that a society faces, which is presumably why the whole process is about to be paid homage to by a new pop-up restaurant in East London.

That's right: for a mere £50 (~$80) per-head (plus booking fee) you can now reserve a seat at Death Row Dinners, a dining experience claiming to draw inspiration from real-life death row inmates' last meal requests. On the website it claims that you can "enjoy the idea of a last meal, without the nasty execution bit." It appears to be some kind of Secret Cinema-style project, but instead of happy-go-lucky losers dressing up like film characters, it’s happy-go-lucky losers pretending they’re about to be killed by the state.

However, don't rush to get your bright orange death onesie and deranged stare out of the cupboard just yet. The website's run by something called Dirty Dishes—a company that, for all my googling, seems not to exist anywhere other than in a footnote on the Death Row Dinners website itself. Perhaps they're shrouding themselves in secrecy because they're wary of a backlash. Perhaps they just don't want to give anything away. Perhaps it's just fake. It's definitely fake... isn't it?

There's plenty of evidence that would seem to suggest so. There's no menu, no phone number and no venue (it's apparently going to take place at a place called "The Penetentiary" in Hoxton Square, but it being a pop-up, of course that doesn't exist yet). There are no foodie-type names attached to it, no production companies and when I went down yesterday no one in Hoxton Square seemed to have heard of it. You'd almost be 100 percent certain that it's an elaborate ruse set up by art students—a commentary on the unthinking modern fetish for the pointlessly wacky that leads to places like this existing—were there not a page that allows you to fork out £50 (~$80) of your hard-earned cash to be "charged, sentenced, searched, and frisked" before eating a burger.

The booking page of the Death Row Dinners website

Someone running a Twitter account for the pop-up has also been responding to people's booking enquiries on Twitter—so, if it is fake, and even if it is "art," whoever's behind it must be treading a fairly thin line with regards to the law. Which I guess is ironic?

The homepage of the site plasters doctored black and white images of "inmates" with placards slung round their necks listing other dishes that you can order; mussels and fries, Coca-Cola, hot fudge sundae, and racks of ribs. They’re the accused, and they’re made to look like their stint in Alcatraz is coming to a grim end. But Alcatraz closed 50 years ago, and people continue to be shot, shocked, and have poisons mainlined into their venous system in the name of justice.

I eventually got in touch with the human who appears to run Death Row Dinners, who assured me that's it's legit, and not just some weird joke. "It's definitely real!" they said over email. "You should start reading more about it in the press over the next few weeks."

Sounds like a laugh, guy. I’ll take two tickets.

Update: Since this article was published Death Row Dinners have released a statement apologising for any offense caused. They're now considering their next steps and are going to update everyone real soon.

Follow Joe Bish on Twitter


Canada's Spy Agency Partnered with Quebec's Hackfest to Recruit

$
0
0
Canada's Spy Agency Partnered with Quebec's Hackfest to Recruit

We Asked a Military Expert How to Conquer an Independent Scotland

$
0
0

Image by Sam Taylor

As the Scottish independence debate comes to a close with Thursday's vote, the No—or pro-United Kingdom—campaign has been getting out the big guns. 400 Scottish military veterans have warned that the Scottish military would be “irresponsibly weakened” with a Yes vote, saying that people should vote No to “Protect the homeland." I guess there’s nothing like the threat of being crushed in a war to stop you from dreaming of making a fresh start.

With that in mind I decided to ask an expert how pathetic or heroic a Scottish army would look, and how easy it would be to take over the country if it became independent, crushing its dreams of freedom under the track of a big tank. On the day Scottish independence crusader Alex Salmond and British Prime Minister David Cameron announced that the referendum was happening, Stuart Crawford and a colleague published a report for the Royal United Services Institute looking at defense in an independent Scotland. A career soldier of nearly 20 years, Crawford once served as the defense spokesman for the Scottish National Party but now intends to stand as a candidate for the English Liberal Democrats. I thought he would be a good person to ask about this stuff, so I called him for a chat.

VICE: So to start with, what might the threats to an independent Scotland actually be?
Stuart Crawford: Well, while I wouldn't want us to be a hostage to fortune, I think there's no foreseeable, credible conventional military threat to an independent Scotland. The chance of anyone trying to attack or invade us seems infinitesimally small.

That being said, Scotland does have a number of things which other nations might covet—primarily our oil and gas reserves. No one's going to invade us to steal our whisky and they're not likely to take our tourism industry by force. I don't think they're going to take our wind turbines either, however much that might please some people. But then what did people say about the Falklands in 1980? Who foresaw the current situation in Ukraine? It's not just the most obvious military threats that countries need to be concerned about.

In the event of a Yes vote, Scotland would have to negotiate a share of the existing British military. What might the resulting force look like?
Well, I'm certain that Scotland could organize its own defense policy and armed forces. There's no doubt about that—we're not a stupid people. On the other hand, we couldn't expect to walk away with anything like a miniature version of the UK's defense system. We're just too small for that. Some of Britain's military assets are currently based in Scotland, and obviously some are not. Others, like the Trident nuclear weapons system, are here in spite of the fact that we don't want them.

So how would Scotland's new army, navy and air force look?
I would expect the army to consist of two brigades, each of around 5,000 soldiers, one regular and one reserve.

For the air force, you'd be talking about around 60 aircraft all told and a navy of 20 to 25 hulls.

In terms of high-end equipment, you would expect to see things like fast jets, submarines, aircraft carriers and main battle tanks [taken] out of Scotland in the short to medium term. Apart from anything else, they'd be very costly for the country to maintain.

In its early days the Scottish defense force might also lack helicopters, artillery, engineering equipment and the like. The other issue that you would probably face is in recruiting special forces, which would be required for situations like rescuing hostages or securing oil rigs. You'd need about 75, but they're very difficult to recruit.

And while we can train people on their feet, in the air and at sea in Scotland, we have nowhere suitable for the training of mechanized units and no facilities in place to train officers. It's not unheard of to do training abroad, and it would make sense to arrange for the use of facilities like the Royal Military Academy at Sandhurst, which already trains overseas cadets, and the British Army Training Unit in Suffield, Canada.

My personal view is that the resulting force would be much more about home defense than any overseas operations—although we would probably wish to retain that capability at least as an option for future governments.

How certain is it that serving Scottish personnel would want to transfer to the new Scottish forces? Might some of them want to honor their oath and continue serving the United Kingdom?
I don't know quite how a transfer would be effected. It seems to me that the Scottish Government assumes that the Scottish regiments would immediately secede to Scotland. That's quite a big assumption. If you assume for the sake of argument that personnel were given the choice, then some would and some wouldn't.

Which countries' armies would Scotland's be equivalent to?
I really don't know in terms of direct comparisons. There are the larger states, of course, but in terms of countries with comparable armed forces Scotland would lie somewhere between Ireland, which has minimal forces, and Denmark, which is considerably more capable. We might also be comparable with New Zealand. It's difficult to say with any certainty because until there's been a negotiation with the rest of the UK—we don't know exactly what the composition of the Scottish defense force would be.

If you were given the task of invading Scotland, how would you go about it?
It's really not something I've ever given any thought to, but there is a pattern to how these things are done. First you would have to suppress air defenses. That could be done either physically or electronically as the Americans did in Iraq. You would then have to disrupt communications—physical communications, which would include things like the Forth Road Bridge and the Kingston Bridge, which is said to be the busiest traffic bridge in Europe, and electronic communications as well.

Then you would look to seize key points. There are several in Scotland—airports would be among the more obvious ones. All of that would depend on disabling air defenses though, and it's difficult to know exactly how that could be achieved because we don't know for certain what those defenses would be.

And if Scotland became a member of NATO, then under Article 5 an attack against one member state would be considered an attack against all. Scotland's international alliances would unquestionably be its strongest defense.

In recent years there have been incidents involving Russian vessels and aircraft around Scotland and the rest of the UK. Why are they prodding us and what could an independent Scotland do about it?
Those incidents mainly involve aircraft, and it's part and parcel of what's been going on since the end of the Second World War. They put a couple of aircraft up, approach UK airspace, and see what happens. They're testing our reaction times. It would really be a case of having reaction forces always there to say: “We know what you're doing and we're here to stop you doing it.”

If Vladimir Putin decided to annex Scotland, could he do it?
I don't think the Americans would let him do it. That would be a direct attack. So much depends on whether Scotland would be a part of NATO, but even if it wasn't, it would be a direct attack on a country where influence could be brought to bear on the UK, the North Sea and the North Atlantic.

But hypothetically, purely as a comparison of forces?
Oh, of course he could. If you put Scotland in a vacuum and let Russia attack then we would last maybe a day.

Let's say there's a Yes vote and England decides it wants us back—how hard would it be for them to take Scotland back by force?
You know, I really don't think that's very probable.

No. But could it happen?
Well it wouldn't be a walk in the park. Obviously Scotland's military would be much smaller than the rest of the UK's. It would depend on when it happened, how well established the Scottish defense force had become. It would also depend again on international alliances, but Scotland and the remaining UK would be far more likely to work in coalition than in opposition.

Thanks for your time Stuart.

@owen_duffy / @SptSam

There's a Social Network That Costs $9,000 to Join

$
0
0

If there’s one thing rich people love more than having money, it’s talking about money with other people who also have money. Thus the existence of country clubs, golf courses, gentleman’s clubs, and now, an exclusive social network that costs $9,000 to join, plus $3,000 a year thereafter, called Netropolitain. There you can discuss “fine wine, fancy cars, and lucrative business decisions without judgment," which sounds more like what regular people think rich people talk about than what they actually do.

The social network is the brainchild of James Touchi-Peters, the former conductor of the Minnesota Philharmonic Orchestra, who I was surprised to learn rakes in enough dough to qualify as wealthy. The site’s biggest draw, besides its exclusivity, is its promise to be ad-free and totally private to outsiders, although a list of members is readily available once you get into the site. I gave James a call the morning after the site finally went live to figure out if this is a great idea for rich people, or an even better idea for bilking the middle class out of nine grand.

VICE: So you guys launched Netropolitan yesterday, yeah?
James Touchi-Peters: That’s correct.

How’s the response been?
It has exceeded our expectations. I mean, our business model is relatively unique, and because of that we knew we were going to get some attention, but we did not expect this. We really didn’t.

Very cool. What about your business model will lead to success?
This whole thing started because when I was traveling in my work, I wanted to get in on a social event where basically I could meet people like myself. I know this is a very arrogant thing to say, but I’m an orchestra conductor and I finally had to realize, my life isn’t like most other peoples’. It isn’t. So I was looking for a place online where I could socialize where people kind of have the same experiences I have had, and I couldn’t find it. Then as I did research to decide whether this would maybe be a viable idea, the one thing that really shocked me—and I’m still shocked by this—is that [no social networks have] used the one model that everyone’s been using in the real world for at least the last 100 years, and that is charging a fee substantial enough to vet the members when they join. I’m still astonished that no one had tried this previously.

So why $9,000? Why not, like, $50,000?
We spent two years dealing with the answer to that question. This was ultimately our logic: We wanted to come up with a figure that was high enough that would discourage most of the people who aren’t in our target demographic, but at the same time, low enough so that those people wouldn’t be intimidated because the business model is new. I’ve had several people tell me—this may surprise you—I’ve had several people tell me they don’t think the fee is high enough. I don’t know if you’ve researched or know anything about fees to real world social clubs or country clubs, most of them charge many multiples of what we’re charging. We thought, because the business model is new online, we couldn’t really go that route. So there’s other minor adjustments in there, but that was the basic formula of coming up with the $9,000 figure.

I see. So, I was reading through it and you have a big emphasis on privacy. But if the membership is private, how will I know which of my friends are on the site before I want to connect to it? Or is it just like, you go on and there’s other rich people there and you connect with random rich people?
The idea for the site—and this occurred to me just this morning, I have to go check the sales site because I don’t know if it says this—it’s your standard, typical social network, except the one change we made is that instead of using the friend method that people are used to usually reciprocally confirming relationships, we’re using the follower method. We assume that most people are going to join the site to meet other people.

So it’s more like Twitter.
We’re assuming most people are going to join not to talk to their friends, but actually, to engage with people they do not know.

It said online that you started with a pool of members. How did you choose those members?
Those were friends of friends of friends. We also contacted various organizations, too—some real world social clubs, that sort of thing. Essentially, we gave them free memberships to start. Those people are all basically pre-qualified and pre-vetted, so we were comfortable with them being in the service. Now that we’ve actually opened for sales yesterday, from this point on, we’re not going to even talk about the number of people in the network. We were before Tuesday, but not now.

Isn’t there sort of a risk that anybody who can pull together $9,000—like, if TMZ or something pulls together $9,000 and gets a membership—they could just see all of the members and post a list or something. Isn’t that a security fear?
That could happen. But they’ll never get any confirmation or denial from us about who the members are. So, yes, we are aware that that could happen. Also, some people said, “Well, $9,000 might not vet your target demographic.” But my feeling about that is, as long as somebody pays the initiation fee and as long as they get in the network and actually behave themselves and don’t act like an idiot, we’re happy to have them.

I see. What kind of demographic are we talking? I imagine that billionaires don’t especially care about millionaires. What’s the lowest income level that should be joining this site?
The answer to that question is a little long, but I’m going to answer it. OK, so in my research, what I discovered when I actually started to do research about whether this was viable, I did not know much about affluence worldwide. So here are a few figures for you: One out of every 200 people on the planet makes more than a million dollars a year. That’s one half of one percent of the world population. In the United States, it’s one out of every 50. It’s actually people talking about the one percent, but it’s actually the two percent. And then the other thing I learned in studying this is that there are different strata of affluence, and they’re really quite distinct. Going from the bottom, you have the “mass affluence,” which are people who are making under $1 million but who are doing very well and like to spend their money. Then above that you have what I have called—there’s no actual term for this—I call it them the “working rich.” These are people who make over $1 million a year, but don’t actually have any substantial assets, either because they’re new to it or they just aren’t saving their money. One or the other; they spend a lot of it. Then, after that, you have people who have liquid assets of over $5 million. Those are what most people call the “true wealthy.” Then the “ultra wealthy” are people who have over $30 million in liquid assets. There are 200,000 of them worldwide, and part of that, there are 15,000 billionaires worldwide.

We decided our target market is two groups: that group that’s in the “working rich,” because most of those people, even though they have large incomes, they still have to show up for work every day, and most of them are working really hard. There’s that, and the other thing we discovered in our research is that there seems to be a pool of fairly wealthy people, not just in the United States but worldwide, that live in smaller towns and smaller cities that may not have any local social network at all. I mean, in the real world. There are very few people in their income stratum in their immediate local area. We think this is a market where these people can particularly benefit from our social network. It would give them a social outlet that they don’t have in their daily life. So those are actually the two groups we’re particularly targeting.

So we’re talking at least millionaires.
Yes, right. And there’s 30 million of those people worldwide, who make over $1 million a year. I do hope you see now, when you look at these figures, I came to the conclusion that there’s an untapped market here. When you take, on top of that, the fact that like I said, nobody has ever tried to use online this one business model that seems to work offline, at some point, it became a no-brainer to me.

Could a person deactivate their account and get a refund if they weren’t satisfied with the site?
This is the way this works: We don’t give any refunds on initiation fees under any circumstances. The reason is, we want to avoid the problem of people paying the money to get into the network to look around, and then deliberately goofing off so that we kick them off and they get their money back. The way that we’re doing this is this: Once you join, if in a subsequent year you do not want to pay the yearly membership fee, your membership can be suspended. It’s never really canceled. Once you pay the initiation fee, you’re a member forever. So you can suspend your membership by not paying from that point on, but if you want to pick it back up again, we’re happy to do that too. So once you pay the initiation fee, you’re a member for perpetuity.

Why the 21-year age limit? I mean, rich is rich. Have you heard of the Rich Kids of Instagram?
Oh, yes, I have. But the reason for that is because different laws worldwide are different for the age of minors. Also, one of the staff members brought up too that it would be weird if we had 18- or 19-year-old people around and someone was talking about drinking, you know. That’s, of course, illegal in the United States if you’re in that group. So those two things put together, we decided to just set it at 21.

Do you guys allow adult content? Like, beyond drinking—something pornographic or something like that.
We’ve never really dealt with that, but I would assume no. I have to tell you, that question has never come up before. I’ll have to deal with that now. But no, we’ve never talked about that, but I would assume we would not because I think pornography can be intimidating to other people.

How long have you guys been working on the site to get it live?
I did two years of research, personally, to decide whether I thought the concept was viable. From when we decided to move forward, we’ve been working on it technically for two years. It’s been a four-year process.

I was just running through the back-end of the site and it seems to be set up in WordPress, which is… I don’t know if that’s of a concern to the people using it. Is WordPress secure enough? WordPress seems like a very common blogging platform to put a millionaires' social club onto.
I can’t comment on the platform we used to design it but I will say we’re extremely confident in the security of the whole thing. That’s all I’ll tell you.

A screenshot of the back end of the site, which was very obviously made in WordPress

You put yourself in this category of the wealthy socialites. I wanted to ask, what is the most expensive thing you own?
See, I’ll tell you: You’ve asked the wrong person that question, because I don’t like stuff. [Laughter] I’m one of those people who likes to buy experiences. I don’t like stuff at all. I hate stuff. [Laughter] That’s just my personal thing, though. I’m a musician and I really, really like to buy experiences. Relatively speaking—everyone talks about this in relative terms—but I live relatively modestly by choice. I do not like stuff. But I have nothing against people who do. I had a large argument with my wife a couple of years ago about whether Aston Martins should exist. I don’t want one, but I’m happy they exist because people buy them. I think they’re rolling works of art. She doesn’t think they should exist at all. So if you want a good bar conversation, bring that up sometime.

I was reading up on you, because you used to be a DJ and you were this very well-known composer and were apart of a controversial sort of situation with the Minnesota Philharmonic. Where did this shift to entrepreneurialism come from?
I’ve actually owned a small software company for 20 years. It’s not really involved in my publicity and I haven’t mentioned it in my personal career publicity because I kind of think it gets off track from my music work, but I’ve actually been doing this for quite some time. I’ve done several projects that were relatively prominent but you didn’t know I was attached to them, and I won’t tell you what they are either. So this is not new for me, actually. I’ve been doing this for quite some time.

Follow Jules Suzdaltsev on Twitter.

The Islamic State Threatened America by Making a Shitty Video

$
0
0

The video released by the Islamic State on Tuesday

If the ominous headlines about the Islamic State that have dominated the news cycle for the past few weeks are to be believed, the extremist group that has gained control of large swaths of Iraq and Syria is the most serious threat to Western democracy since the Soviet Union. There’s no doubt that the Islamic State is an awful and terrifying organization: It’s instituted extremely harsh Sharia law in the territory it’s conquered, it’s reportedly forced women into sexual slavery, and it has notoriously beheaded Western journalists and aid workers on camera. But what it seems best at is churning out propaganda calibrated to terrify the rest of the world. 

The video of the decapitation of American journalist James Foley last month generated a media panic (“SAVAGES!” shouted the cover of the New York Post, which featured a gruesome photo of the act) that was no doubt exactly what the jihadists anticipated. Provocations like that have led to the inevitable drumbeat of posturing that precedes a full-blown war. Last week President Obama informed America that he was going to order a “relentless” campaign against the group in Iraq and Syria while insisting that he wouldn’t be deploying ground troops to the region. That message was undercut by General Martin Dempsey, Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff, saying publicly that the Iraqi military was horribly incompetent and boots on the ground might be needed after all. Meanwhile, many Republicans in Congress are essentially demanding an all-out offensive against the new bad guys. In other words, heigh-ho, heigh-ho, it’s off to war we go.

It's a war that the Islamic State seems to be intent on goading the US into. Its latest bit of America-baiting is a short video billed as a trailer for a movie called Flames of War. According to the Daily Mail, it’s a “Hollywood-style propaganda video” that serves as a “challenge to Obama,” and the Guardian referred to it as “slickly made” and noted that it includes the “now-familiar high-production hallmarks” of one of the group’s videos.

Knowing its provenance as the product of an organization of murderers, the minute-long clip is a bit disturbing to watch. But far from being “slick,” this is a shitty, incomprehensible video that could be made by any 14-year-old with a laptop, a fondness for Call of Duty, and an Adderall prescription.

It opens with every adolescent boy’s favorite thing: explosions!

Explosions!

EXPLOSIONS!

The New York Times describes this portion of the video as showing “American tanks and troops under attack by fire,” but it’s not clear when or where these clips came from, and some of the explosions are obviously just bad CGI flames. The flames are accompanied by singing in Arabic.

After the first round of explosions, we get a second dose of fake flames surrounding clips of what are presumably fighters for the Islamic State firing weapons.

Then we’re back to the explosions. You can’t tell from this still, but this particular explosion is going in reverse slow motion:

This is threatening because it shows that the terrorists have acquired knowledge of Final Cut Pro.

Then we get more slow motion, this time of another jihadist shooting at another something:

…and yet more fake fire, this time laid over footage of American troops doing various things. It’s the kind of thing a dim-witted and conspiracy-obsessed film student might cook up in his spare time.

Then:

George W. Bush is never going to live that moment down, is he?

The Mission Accomplished banner is shown with a clip of Obama saying "American combat troops will not be returning to fight in Iraq" and a shaky shot of the exterior of the White House at night. The video ends with a brief glimpse at what looks like an execution of some prisoners…

…and finally, the Game of Thrones­–esque title card. “Flames of War: Fighting Has Just Begun.”

Obviously the video is partially about glorifying the Islamic State, just as the group has attempted to do with its glossy English-language magazines and Twitter app. (Assholes are always concerned with how they appear to others, and these extremists aren’t an exception to that rule.) It’s also clearly meant as a threat and a taunt, and in that capacity it’s probably going to work.

Since the video came out, Republican senator Jim Inhofe went on Fox News and said that “Our homeland is at risk, and we’ve got to win the war,” and Eliot Engel, a Democrat from New York, stood on the House floor and said that if the Islamic State wasn’t stopped we’d have “many more September 11ths” in our future. Watching the Flames of War trailer it becomes evident that the jihadists are looking forward to the coming war; judging from the discourse in the US, a lot of American politicians are right there with them.

Follow Harry Cheadle on Twitter.

Welcome to Noisey Jamaica: Episode 1

$
0
0
Welcome to Noisey Jamaica: Episode 1
Viewing all 38002 articles
Browse latest View live




Latest Images