Quantcast
Channel: VICE CA
Viewing all 38002 articles
Browse latest View live

Kim Gordon Is a Badass Feminist Rock Goddess

$
0
0

[body_image width='800' height='1204' path='images/content-images/2015/03/02/' crop='images/content-images-crops/2015/03/02/' filename='kim-gordon-body-image-1425320618.jpg' id='32112']

Kim Gordon famously said, "People pay to see other people believe in themselves."

If you needed proof, look no further than the audience at the Strand's sold-out event last Tuesday, some of whom waited hours in the biting cold for a chance to buy a copy of her new memoir Girl in a Band, and hear her interviewed.

If being the cofounder, frontwoman, and bass player for experimental, post-punk alternative rock band Sonic Youth and helping inspire the Riot Grrrl movement wasn't enough to secure Gordon's place in the pantheon of badass feminist rock goddesses, then her elegant rise out of the smoking rubble of her divorce from Sonic Youth cofounder and philandering husband of 27 years Thurston Moore, should be. Since the split, the 60-something Gordon has formed a new band, Head/Body, an experimental electric band with Bill Nace and released a record, shown her art in the U.S. and abroad, beaten breast cancer, modeled for YSL—and, oh yeah, written a book that has crashed the New York Times Bestseller list—it's clear that not only is it time to paint Gordon's throne gold, you can nail the sucker down.

Despite the fact that Gordon grew up in California in the 60s and 70s and spent the last decade living and raising her daughter Coco in Northampton, Gordon's prominence on the downtown art and music scene in the 80s and 90s—that long-gone, oft-mythologized dirty glory days of the Lower East Side—causes New Yorkers to still hail her as one of their own. Which may explain why Gordon, drinking red wine backstage, seemed almost well, nervous. Gordon can be shy, and as we took the stage, slipping into our leather armchairs in front of a full house she joked, "I always enjoy a fabulously awkward conversation."

This interview is an edited transcript of our conversation from that night.

Elissa Schappell: You say you're awkward, but people don't see you shy or awkward. They see you as cool. Or we think, "Oh, she hates me."


Kim Gordon: It's good to have options.

Tell me about the title, Girl in a Band. I mean it's not shocking—that's probably the number-one question you've gotten asked in your career. There weren't many women in bands in the 80s and 90s.


Yeah, it's sort of this ironic, horrible question pretty much every girl hates to be asked. What's it like to be a girl in a band? It was sort of thrown out as a working title and I thought, God, I got to find something better than that. But it stuck around because it had multiple ironic meanings. It seemed like you can hang a lot of stuff on that.

What is the girl's job in the band?


Well, I think being a girl in a band's job is to add an element of chaos, mystery, an unknown energy. Like, What she's going to do next? It makes it slightly unpredictable.

You have this great line about how " the girl anchors the stage, sucks in the male gaze, and throws it back at the audience." I was wondering, how does that fuel your performance?


Well, it could be that. I don't know. That's a good line. I mean, I was sort of aware of being projected upon, but every performer is. But I have used that maybe as such a panic for lyrics in terms of imagining an actress as a typical passive object in a film. What happens when you break through that expectation. What happens if you turn it around? I think that was what was so amazing about Riot Grrrl. That's what they really did. They took that and completely ran with that.

Let's talk about why you wrote this memoir. You aren't starving and...


Well, I needed another source of income. I didn't want a nine-to-five job. It's up there with my nightmare, which is teaching French class. Then showing to a final when I'm sleeping.

Did you write to set the record straight? Or because you thought, let's see—you paint, you make music, you design clothes, you direct—I have a lot of extra time on my hands?


No. I mean, I never really thought about writing a memoir. My initial reaction was to make an art project out of it. You know like a noir novel. That was seriously one of the ideas. Then I got approached by a few editors, and then my first instinct was to like write a memoir like Bob Dylan. Just make shit up. Memoirs are a weird thing. You aren't remembering, you're recreating.

It seems like the act of writing the book was a process of self-discovery.


Yeah, I think when something really dramatic happens in your life there's this process of creation that splits your life up in pieces. There's a point where you want to see how you got to where you are. What part did I play?

It kind of sets you off on this course of wanting to discover who you are and owning up to it in some way. I think writing is this kind of way for me to figure stuff out.

It's like that great Joan Didion quote, "I write entirely to find out what I'm thinking, what I'm looking at, what I see and what it means..."


Right.

Marriage isn't that much different then being in a band. Everybody plays their role and if they don't, it's chaos. Everything breaks loose. Is it possible for two artists, male and female—same age, equally ambitious, successful—to really live together? Can you both be artists at the same time, especially if you have a kid running around?


I don't know. I think artists need a lot of space in their life. If you're lucky, you have a partner who understands that. Then you need to find someone who can be your wife. I mean in terms of just dealing with things like scheduling and all those other things you have to do. I think it's really hard. I know a lot of female artists who don't have kids and I think there's a reason for that. But people stay married because they love each other and they want to work things out.

I mean, it's the same reason why some bands last or don't. You have to be committed to make it work, because you like the music.

In 2013 you said you missed playing with Sonic Youth, do still miss it?


I don't miss playing with Sonic Youth now. I did it for so long, and I feel like now I have a situation with Bill Nace, [Head/Body], which feels closer to me and closer to my interests. I'm also focusing more on visual art, which is more of who I am.

How has this rupture—the divorce, the breakup of Sonic Youth affected your art?


I feel like it made me unstuck. Sometimes everything just converges at once and it's a shit storm, but it put me back on track in terms of what I should be doing. I can only say good things have happened to me.

I really liked reading about you growing up in California in the 60s and 70s, going to scraping goatskins in school, choreographing dances to Frank Zappa, making pottery. Did you ever imagine this would be your life? Was the music a surprise?


Yeah, the music is a surprise. I think in a way punk rock opened up people in ways they didn't expect. It was just the most interesting thing since the 60s—and I'm old enough to know about what the 60s were like. It meant different things here than it did in England. It was exciting, and it drew people into music who never thought they'd be musicians.

But when you came to New York in the early 80s you weren't into punk as much as no wave. Which is less conventional and not as cheeky as punk. What music set your brain on fire?


Music that was very confrontational for the audience. Bands like Mars and D.N.A. Then there's band like the Static, which was Glenn Branca's band at the time. A lot of artists and people came to New York to play music.

You didn't know how to play the guitar or the bass before you came to New York. So how did that start?


Dan Graham introduced me to this girl Miranda Stanton, who played bass and Christine Hahn, who played drums. We formed this all-girl group called Introjection. Dan wanted do this famous performance piece of his, an audience mirror piece, with an all-girl group, and he asked us. So I learned guitar. Someone taught me how to do like a sort of jazz half-chording on the guitar. That was it, man.

Was there a moment when you thought, Yeah, this is what I should be doing?


I thought it was thrilling when we did the performance. I was incredibly nervous. But it was like going on this huge rollercoaster ride, and then it was over. Then the next day I felt like a rock-and-roller or something. I'm wondering, Should I continue doing music or do art? It was very confusing.

But you've never not made art. Even when you were making music you were still making art.


To some extent. I mean, for a number of years, it was pretty much on the backburner. I pretty much always did think of myself as a visual artist. Rather then identifying myself as a musician.

When you started writing music with Sonic Youth, how did it work?


Mostly we sat around playing. Jamming. Someone would start playing something interesting. Sometimes Thurston would start with a riff that he sort of related to and worked around it. Then I would do big extra music. Then we would meet in the middle.

When you look at the songs that were the most critically acclaimed and the most popular they are from the 90s, and they have feminist themes, and they are ones you wrote. Was there a reason you started writing more then?


I was aware that we had more of a platform and audience, and then I was more aware of women in the corporate world, as we'd go into the offices.

Talk about that—this is why I threatened to bring pliers—talk about the song "Swimsuit Issue".


Well, I guess shortly after we signed there was a scandal at Geffen where some executive was accused of sexual harassment by his secretary. So, I decided to write a song about it and used the Swimsuit Issue of Sports Illustrated Swimsuit sort of a metaphor.

The song ends with you listing the names of all the swimsuit models. But wasn't there more to it than just thinking, This is interesting.


I think there's a lot of material to write songs about if you're a woman. Maybe more than if you're a man. I mean, emo-core showed guys could write songs whining about how they're misunderstood by their girlfriends and shit... They became liberated, [ laughs] but if you're not just writing about a broken heart—there are a lot of other things to write about. In our band we took advantage of that. I mean "Tunic" was about Karen Carpenter.

When I writing my last book I put together a playlist of songs that would help get me through the rough parts. And when I started thinking, no one cares about women and control, I'd listen to "Tunic" and think, Fuck yes they do.


Yeah, eating disorders are kind of a metaphor for how far women will go please other people. The feeling that our body is basically the one thing we have to work with. It's a powerful thing. Women's bodies. It's a challenge to talk about things like that in a way that isn't overtly political. Some people thought the song was just kitschy.

Which was because of Todd Haynes' movie, Superstar.


Which was an amazing movie. Much better then the TV version.

But then you listen to it, and it's a dark, deep intense song and it doesn't just speak to women. You go to a show and both men and women are singing along.


At the time the Carpenters were regarded as incredibly conservative and a part of the establishment. People didn't take them seriously. But Karen's voice is incredibly sexy and soulful so she made those lyrics her own. They're incredibly dark. The Carpenters are weirdly radical.

What about "Kool Thing"?


That was a weird song about a bunch of different things partly inspired by a film Raymond Pettibon did called Weather Underground. Where it's kind of like being sexually drawn to the Black Panthers. Then throwing Jane Fonda and Barbarella into the mix.

You see those influences in the video, but what is the song coming out of?


We were very inspired by LL Cool J and his first record Radio. Rick Rubin produced it, and I interviewed him for Spin. I had to go his rehearsal, and I was really curious. Like, how much did he know about rock? I was sort of disappointed when he said Bon Jovi was his favorite rock band. It made me think about your expectations for performers and what you project on them.

Chuck D has a cameo.


We were recording at the same studio and we thought we'd ask him. He kind of did the most cliché thing when he said, "Yeah, word up. Tell it like it is." It was kind of cliché in a way that we deserved.

Do you think as an artist gets older their work becomes more political?


I don't know. You just feel like less of a loser. You've been through more so it doesn't really matter. When I started playing with Bill I thought, Thank god, I am just playing music that I don't have to promote . I could just enjoy it. It ended up being very freeing. I could set the bar low and I could just play music. It turned out to be a very radical record.

I don't want to talk about all this Lana Del Rey Twitter bullshit, but I'm a feminist, and you're a feminist. However, not all women are feminists and some of the very best feminists are men. So, how do you define feminism?


It's changed gradually over the years. But the bottom line is, it's really about people's rights around the world. Women shouldn't be abused. They should be fucking free. All the other subtitles and everything else doesn't really matter. Whether you're a man or a woman you have to morally answer to yourself.

Despite how Lana Del Rey may feel...


Feminism doesn't mean women are free to do whatever they want. You can't go and stab someone.


50 Shades of Gray

$
0
0

[body_image width='1275' height='1698' path='images/content-images/2015/03/02/' crop='images/content-images-crops/2015/03/02/' filename='50-shades-of-gray-685-body-image-1425326434.jpg' id='32123']

[body_image width='1200' height='1589' path='images/content-images/2015/03/02/' crop='images/content-images-crops/2015/03/02/' filename='50-shades-of-gray-685-body-image-1425326611.jpg' id='32124']

[body_image width='1200' height='1589' path='images/content-images/2015/03/02/' crop='images/content-images-crops/2015/03/02/' filename='50-shades-of-gray-685-body-image-1425326624.jpg' id='32126']

[body_image width='1200' height='1589' path='images/content-images/2015/03/02/' crop='images/content-images-crops/2015/03/02/' filename='50-shades-of-gray-685-body-image-1425326633.jpg' id='32127']

See some of Claire Milbrath's other Poor Gray comics.

Five Questions I Don't Want Answered About the Vaginal FaceTime Camera

$
0
0

[body_image width='1275' height='717' path='images/content-images/2015/03/02/' crop='images/content-images-crops/2015/03/02/' filename='five-questions-i-dont-want-answered-about-the-vaginal-face-time-camera-273-body-image-1425330387.jpg' id='32138']

Don't use this to FaceTime your vagina to someone. Why would you do that. Screenshot via YouTube

If there are two things that exemplify the modern Western world, they are garish displays of sexuality and gratuitous, narcissistic photography. It's a wonderful, crazy world, all right. But how are we ever going to merge our two chief cultural passions, you ask? Who will find a way to seamlessly combine 2K15's atmosphere of nonstop sexual stimuli with our need for constant oversharing?

Well, ask no more!

The "Svakom Gaga Camera Vibrator™" is a vibrator (obviously) equipped with a high-def camera. If you've ever been in the middle of pleasuring yourself with a vibrator and thought, "Wow, I wish I could FaceTime someone but my phone is so far away and my vibrator is right here," this is the gadget for you.

The "sex selfie stick," as UK newspaper the Independent styled it, is an unnecessary and horrifying appliance. It is the apotheosis of modern Western civilization, which is itself terrible. We have gazed into the abyss, and the abyss gave us the Svakom Gaga Camera Vibrator™.

After reading about the Svakom Gaga Camera Vibrator™, I was left with a number of questions, but because it is a terrible invention with unsettling uses, I don't actually want any of my questions answered. Please don't tell me your answers. Let's all just silently share our horror.

1. Where did the idea for a vibrator-slash-camera come from?
Is "innards porn" a thing? Is that where you perverts came up with this creation? That must be the most disturbing possibility, but is there any scenario in which this invention is conceived that isn't upsetting? "We wanted to create a home endoscopy machine for vaginas. We're democratizing science!" "Every time I use my vibrator, I really feel like FaceTiming with my friends." "We think everyone is curious about the inside of vaginas. Not, like, just inside, but deep inside. Right up in the guts."

It's all terrible.

2. Why is it only for vaginas? Is there a material reason this isn't marketed as a vagina-and-butt camera?
It makes sense that the vibrator function of this device is marketed toward vagina-having people. But the camera makes all of us potential clients, because if people want to record the insides of their vaginas with cameras, there are definitely people who also want to record the insides of their butts. So why isn't this device being marketed as such? Are the materials with which it's made up to the task of being inserted both anally and vaginally?

Actually, never mind.

3. You've come up with the idea for the Svakom Gaga Camera Vibrator™ (somehow). But even after it's in your head, why inflict it on the world?
What possible good could this device do that would counteract how horrifying it is? Are we going to be emailing endoscopies to our doctors in two years, and avoiding cancer by doing so? If not, this object never should have been unleashed on us. Keep your dystopian sex-pocalypse ideas to yourselves.

4. What's with the name? Why "Gaga"?
Is Lady Gaga behind this? It would make sense, given her creepy/sexy aesthetic. If the Svakom Gaga Camera Vibrator™ is part of Lady Gaga's bid for relevance, the Little Monsters of the world are going to flood the internet with genital selfies. All we can hope is that Tony Bennett doesn't join in.

5. Why is this happening to me?
The world is a futuristic hellscape and there's no way out.

Follow Tannara Yelland on Twitter.

Girl Writer: I Had a Sex Slave, and It Was Awesome

$
0
0

Back in December, I relayed the romantic tale of my first sex slave. My feelings on having a submissive partner were unclear: I didn't like the whipping and spanking, but I did love being worshiped and having my dishes cleaned for me. After my sex slave and I broke up, I wasn't sure if it was really possible to be a part of this community if I didn't want to call men "small-dicked shitheads" and beat them up for not following my orders. I tried dating on Fetlife, but after getting too many messages from gentleman begging me to penetrate them with a dildo or be the star of my very own gang bang, I decided to delete my account. I was closing to giving up until a friend of mine suggested I use OkCupid.

I already had an OkCupid profile—one that hadn't introduced me to any sex slaves—so I created a second one, using a faceless photo of me posing in front of a mirror that someone had just puked on as my profile picture. I wrote explicitly in my bio that I was looking for a sub who was into the same things I was: praise, worship, cock ownership, and servitude. I made it clear that I wasn't interested in humiliation or physical violence.

To my genuine surprise, my inbox was flooded within hours. I was getting messages from all kinds of guys. Most disregarded the majority of my profile, and thought I was just looking for sex, which they graciously offered to engage in with me. A few needles did manage to pop out of the oversexed haystack, however. Most of them were guys who claimed to have always been curious about this sort of thing, but never before acted on it.

I amassed about ten phone numbers—something I hadn't done through the site in over a year. Of course, in the world of online dating, ten phone numbers does not equate to ten real-life dates. Once you exchange numbers, a few days of awkward texting follows. A vague plan to hang out next week-ish is made, and then either they bail or you do. I am ashamed to admit that I have canceled dates last minute, because I simply did not feel like showering or was more invested in Netflix (often both, to be honest).

Eventually, I went on two dates. One guy, Jason, told me he had 11 siblings, and I told him his parents were stupid. We never spoke again. Another guy, Zach, was nice, but there was no real spark.

Of course, spark or not, I was still drunk enough to invite him back to my place and sit on his face. You know, for the hell of it. But after a few minutes, he started having a full-on panic attack. I told him to put his head down between his knees, then brought him a cup of water. Once he calmed down, he apologized profusely, then went home. I spent the rest of the night staring at my vagina, wondering what past trauma it could have reminded him of. Getting lost in a cave? Birth? Eating a spoiled roast beef sandwich? After this incident with Zach, I basically did with my second OkCupid profile what I had done with my first: I gave up hope.

Then, when I checked my inbox two weeks later, I got a message from Andrew.

Andrew was a grad student living in northern California, who at the time of our tryst was visiting his hometown of Los Angeles for a few weeks. He sent me a long message, letting me know that he would love to be at my disposal for as long as he was in town. We met that same night.

He looked like almost every guy I've ever had sex with: tall, lanky, dorky. Some cardigan bullshit. I was into it. He bought me a drink, and right away we got into the specifics. We had to set up guidelines for what each of us wanted, as well as what we would and would not do. It was the most peculiar conversation I've had within the initial ten minutes of a first date, but I'm starting to think this should be standard first-date rules, kink-minded or not. I basically reiterated all that was in my profile, and he reiterated that he was only in town for a few weeks. He then added that he had a domme up north who owns him. In fact, he had to ask her for approval to meet with me. She was supposedly fine with it because I did not want to physically harm him. That's "their thing."

For those three weeks, Andrew came to my place almost every day to do whatever I wanted. He cooked for me, and after serving me my meals, he would clean everything up. I often had a list of chores for him to do, such as folding my laundry and getting my groceries for me. He'd drive me anywhere I needed to go and usually waited for me in his parked car until it was time to take me home. We tried letting him bathe me the first few days (his request), but he didn't scrub my scalp hard enough and used far too much soap. So instead, I'd make him massage me and apply lotion to my body post-shower.

He often requested permission to masturbate after doing so. I'd say yes and just go about my business while he jerked off on my bed. Every time, I could feel him watching me, but I never acknowledged him. I simply continued brushing my hair, or picking out an outfit to wear. It turned him on knowing that I couldn't care less about his pleasure. He would ask my permission to come, and when it was permitted, he'd have to say "thank you" out loud several times until he was completely finished. I'd make him lie still and wait for me to be done with what I was doing before he could wipe his man-junk off of his stomach and chest.

Only once did we have penetrative sex. Other than that, our system involved me sitting on his face while he jerked himself off. When he slept over, he would sleep on the floor (again, his request). I slept in my bed and would wake up to him cooking me breakfast. When we were apart, he texted me things such as: "Good morning goddess. I woke up thinking of you. Hoping you'll allow me to serve you today," and "Very horny right now thinking of you. Thinking about being on all fours and licking your ass."

I felt a level of comfort with Andrew I had never felt with anyone before. I never felt self-conscious around him, or scared to say or do something wrong. He had devoted himself to me for those three weeks in a way no man ever has, and I liked it. As much as he was turned on by serving me, I was turned on by being served. Nothing felt forced. It was my first time being in a romantic partnership where I truly felt like I could be myself.

On our first date, Andrew asked me why I was so against violence and humiliation. I answered at the time that it just didn't feel right, but I didn't know why. Now I know why: I don't desire a submissive man in my life who fetishizes serving a woman because he feels it's "wrong." Andrew was able to worship and praise me without needing that element, and I see now that what we had was extremely rare. Our dom/sub dynamic played out on a psychological level more so than a physical one. I don't know if I can repeat what I had with Andrew with another man, but I sure as hell know now that I want to try.

Follow Alison Stevenson on Twitter.

A DEA Agent Tried to Stop Medical Weed from Coming to Utah By Saying Bunnies Will Get Stoned

$
0
0

[body_image width='640' height='436' path='images/content-images/2015/03/02/' crop='images/content-images-crops/2015/03/02/' filename='a-dea-agent-is-trying-to-stop-medical-weed-in-utah-by-saying-bunnies-will-get-stoned-body-image-1425334954.jpg' id='32166']

Via Flickr user Yuri Levchenko

On Thursday, DEA Special Agent Matt Fairbanks warned a state senate panel that stoned rabbits might be part of the Utah's future. The legislature is currently considering Senate Bill 259, which would allow really sick people to consume medical marijuana edibles. According to Fairbanks, it would also allow bunnies to get really, really high.

Fairbanks's argument—scheduled in between a discussion on prostitution laws and something called "grandparent's rights"—was apparently gleaned from 23 years of experience with the agency, where he's a member of the marijuana task force.

"I've come to represent the actual science, and I come with severe concerns," he told the committee members.

He said that as part of his job, he's spent time on mountainsides, where he's run into bunnies that have "cultivated a taste" for pot after stumbling into some illegal grow operations. "One of them refused to leave us, and we took all the marijuana around him, but his natural instincts to run were somehow gone," Fairbanks explained.

Some (anecdotal) evidence supports Fairbank's assertion that rabbits will seek out pot. In 2011, police in Denmark busted an 84-year-old woman who was unknowingly feeding weed to her bunnies. For what it's worth, she said they "loved it."

Pet forum users make a similar argument. "Today, Echo (the bunny) and I were in my backyard, and I was smoking around her," user SixxAm wrote on RabbitsOnline in 2012. "She hopped up onto my knee's [sic] and stuck her face in my smoke. She seemed to enjoy it, so I continued with her."

But what matters isn't that rabbits "cultivate a taste" for weed, as Fairbanks puts it. The important thing is how might impact their health. And for all the DEA agent's claims about "represent[ing] science," he seems to have missed one study that actually looked at happens to rabbits when they're stoned. In 1976, four scientists took on this question for the Journal of Toxicology and Environmental Health and found the answer was basically nothing.

"It may be concluded that THC treatment subcutaneously for 13 days in rabbits up to a dose level of 100 mg/kg/day did not produce any significant toxicity, except anorexia and some local dermal irritation," the authors of the study wrote.

As of right now, medical marijuana is legal in about half of the states. Last month, the surgeon general admitted it "may be helpful." According to NORML, 18 states have even decriminalized the drug.

So what do federal agents have left to scare people with when they don't have social stigma, reefer madness or fear of prison time on their side? Apparently, little besides the terrifying prospect of bunnies getting high.

Back in December, the US Senate approved an amendment blocking the Department of Justice from going after medical marijuana dispensaries—a key moment in the decades-long war on drugs

That furry critters are pretty much the only remaining plausible victims of pot decriminalization suggests the end of that war might be even closer than we thought.

Follow Allie Conti on Twitter.

Despite PETA's Best Efforts, Fur Is Back in Fashion

$
0
0

[body_image width='2000' height='1333' path='images/content-images/2015/03/02/' crop='images/content-images-crops/2015/03/02/' filename='a-new-generation-of-fur-happy-designers-is-choosing-luxury-over-animal-rights-456-body-image-1425335641.jpg' id='32167']
Photo by Mitchell Mclennan for MADE

It was all mink everything at Astrid Andersen's stellar debut bespoke show for MADE Fashion Week. The London designer's fall/winter 2015 collection featured all sorts of fur looks, from an oversized swakara basketball jersey to a fuzzy varsity sweatshirt. Having seen the collection firsthand, the overwhelming presence of gaudy animal hair on the runway signified to me just how prevalent and popular fur is among emerging designers.

In the year 2000, there were only 41 designers using fur in ready-to-wear. The teeny numbers are largely thanks to the efforts of groups like PETA in shifting popular opinion about fur in the 90s. Today, however, there are over 500. From New York to Milan, and from the catwalk to the crowd, it's hard to look anywhere at fashion week without seeing an animal pelt draped over someone's shoulders. All the hot designers, from Alexander Want to Hood By Air, are experimenting with fur. Which is weird to me—I grew up in a generation that was lambasted with grotesque videos of furriers mutilating cute animals.

[youtube src='//www.youtube.com/embed/dxE5O5iwSFU' width='100%' height='360']

The formation of People for the Ethical Treatment of Animals in 1981 kicked off the era of intense backlash against the fur industry. PETA's early campaigns focused on animal testing and slaughterhouse cruelty. But in the early 90s, the group turned its attention to fur and released a series of investigative videos in 1994 that documented ranchers abusing chinchillas and minks by clipping electric wires to their genitals and injecting them with weed killers. Then it launched the "I'd Rather Go Naked Than Wear Fur" campaign, which drew the support of several celebrities willing to pose nude, like Cindy Crawford and Naomi Campbell. Prominent vegetarian musicians like grunge-hero Eddie Vedder also helped make the fur look outmoded and uncool.

It seemed like the movement to ban fur was unstoppable with its strong celebrity backing, passing of international animal welfare legislation, and brands like Calvin Klein discontinuing their support of fur. In 2007, PETA Founder Ingrid Newkirk boasted that the young designers weren't even into using fur anymore. It was only the "old fogy designers like Karl Lagerfeld and so on... who want to be bad boys" who were still holding on to the tired trend.

[body_image width='2000' height='1335' path='images/content-images/2015/03/02/' crop='images/content-images-crops/2015/03/02/' filename='a-new-generation-of-fur-happy-designers-is-choosing-luxury-over-animal-rights-456-body-image-1425337470.jpg' id='32182']
Photo of Andrew Boyle for MADE

But in the new millennium, a new fur trend bubbled in the aughts and has finally blossomed in the past five years. It started with artists like Busta Rhymes, 50 Cent, and Lil' Kim sporting mink and chinchilla in music videos and magazine covers, helping dope boy chic become vogue. As hip-hop artists became the dominant purveyors of cool, the trends went from thrift store flannels to luxurious fur coats.

Over the past 15 years, the fur market in the US has been on the uptick, with experts from the Fur Information Council of America estimating that 2014's growth was more than 10 percent. It's no coincidence that this trajectory has coincided with hip-hop taking over the catwalk—from Sean Combs winning a CFDA award in 2004 to Kanye West presenting the most talked-about collection at the most recent New York Fashion Week.

The rise of fur is also being fueled by growth in the luxury market, as a growing number of people can afford the lavish garments that can fetch as much as $30,000. The US had a 5 percent increase last year in personal luxury spending, trumping Asia and Europe, which explains why I saw London designer Astrid Andersen's bespoke collection at Milk Studios in New York instead of the Somerset House in London.

[body_image width='2000' height='1334' path='images/content-images/2015/03/02/' crop='images/content-images-crops/2015/03/02/' filename='a-new-generation-of-fur-happy-designers-is-choosing-luxury-over-animal-rights-456-body-image-1425337631.jpg' id='32185']
Photo by Koury Angelo for MADE

While PETA remains active in fighting the use of fur, it appears fashion's attitude about the subject can be summed up with Kanye West's "Cold" lyrics: "Can a real n**** get money anymore? Tell PETA my mink is dragging on the floor."

"Designers have embraced fur for its unique textural characteristics, its visual cues and its warmth, its sustainability, and the creative flexibility it offers," says Keith Kaplan from Fur Information Council of America. "Innovations in manufacturing technology have made fur a broad creative canvas. The result is more designers adapting fur in more ways than ever to ready-to-wear, outerwear, shoes, and accessories."

These days, the fur manufacturers are fighting back against PETA with their own marketing campaigns that purport real fur as being more natural and sustainable than faux fur. They criticize the production of fake fur due to its use of non-renewable petroleum-based materials like nylon that take thousands of years to decompose and can cause nitrous-oxide pollution. And they tout furring as a job-creating industry. Valued at $1.39 billion in the US in 2013, some fur proponents estimate the industry employs more than 200,000 people in North America alone.

[body_image width='2000' height='1333' path='images/content-images/2015/03/02/' crop='images/content-images-crops/2015/03/02/' filename='a-new-generation-of-fur-happy-designers-is-choosing-luxury-over-animal-rights-456-body-image-1425337915.jpg' id='32190']
Photo by Mitchell Mclennan for MADE

They also balk at the accusations of cruelty and claim that their practices are tightly regulated at all levels, with animal welfare as their top priority. Kopenhagen Furs, for example, is a Danish luxury brand that works with designers like Astrid Andersen. It says it has strict regulations for the minks it raises. And, according to the company's website, it provide fur farmers with tools to manage their farms to correct any welfare problems and require annual veterinarian visits.

Michael Whealan, Executive Director of the Fur Commission USA goes on to say that American fur farms are also held to high standards of care. "As far as mink production in the US is concerned, I think the biggest misconception is that mink on farms are not cared for properly, or that they are abused in some way," says Whealan. "Animal rights advocates have been spreading this message to further their anti-animal agenda for decades, despite their inability to back it up with evidence. Every veterinarian will tell you that if an animal is mistreated or neglected, the first evidence will show up in the condition of the fur, so it goes to show that US farmers take animal care and welfare extremely seriously."

But PETA Senior Vice President Dan Mathews doesn't seem to be worried about the influx of fur on the runway telling me that "niche couture designers [like Astrid Anderson] may cling to their fur fetish, but mainstream retailers (including Ralph Lauren, Calvin Klein, Tommy Hilfiger, etc...) have abandoned fur."

[body_image width='2000' height='1334' path='images/content-images/2015/03/02/' crop='images/content-images-crops/2015/03/02/' filename='a-new-generation-of-fur-happy-designers-is-choosing-luxury-over-animal-rights-456-body-image-1425338054.jpg' id='32192']
Photo by Koury Angelo for MADE

While it is true that retailers like H&M and Forever 21 and brands like Tommy Hilfiger stopped using furs like angora, these American lifestyle brands didn't stray away from the fur trend and have been using faux fur instead in recent collections. And there's no guarantee they'll resist the appeal of fur as the demand continues to ratchet up, considering other brands like Georgio Armani have made a similar pledges, only to resort back to fur once it was lucrative.

The reality is, fur is all over the runways right now, which means it's only a matter of time before it makes its way onto high street and then—whether PETA likes it or not—trickles down to Joe Shmoe at the mall. But—all the animal suffering aside—if Joe starts looking like Cam'ron circa 2002, maybe it's worth it?

Follow Erica on Twitter.

Ink Spots: 'Flaneur' Magazine Will Turn Your Street into a Print Publication

$
0
0

[body_image width='737' height='960' path='images/content-images/2015/02/28/' crop='images/content-images-crops/2015/02/28/' filename='flaneur-body-image-1425149941.jpg' id='31721']

If you really sat down and tried, you could turn a lot of pages in the space of 30days. While we've spent over a decade providing you with about 120 of those pages every month, it turns out there are many more magazines in the world other than VICE. This series, Ink Spots, is a helpful guide on which of those zines, pamphlets, and publications you should be reading when you're not staring at ours.

All images courtesy of Flaneur Magazine.

Flaneur is part literary magazine, part culture journal, part serialized, interdisciplinary art object. The Berlin-based creators describe the publication as a "vessel." Each issue focuses on a specific street in a specific city across the globe, then explores each locale through idiosyncratic interviews, photo essays (with off-kilter layouts), poetry, illustrations, and even more abstract stylistic devices. "I don't think that Flaneur actually really is a magazine," Grashina Gabelmann, the co-editor-in-chief, told me. "I think it's just that we chose to present these streets in the magazine format."

Created in 2013 by Ricarda Messner (now the publisher), Flaneur is about to release its fourth edition, focused on Rome. While past issues have featured streets in vibrant, artist-hubs like Berlin, Leipzig, and Montreal, the Italian capital was a change of pace for Messner, Gabelmann, and Fabian Saul (the other editor-in-chief). Rome is full of history, but the city's present state felt stagnant and dry to the team, as well as the locals they spoke with while putting together this issue. As a result, they picked the most tourist-y and obnoxious street in the ancient city to be its nucleus: Corso Vittorio Emanuele II.

"How cool would it be to take the most annoying street where everyone thinks there's nothing left to discover, and then find something new in it?" explained Gabelmann.

The Rome issue features a photo essay where two photographers walked down Corso Vittorio separately and documented it with disposable cameras. It also includes an account of an experimental performance piece the editors organized in Italy in which they asked locals to "donate" water to a miniature sculpture of a Roman ruin—the idea being to make the city less dry.

I recently talked to Messner and Gabelmann about the newest edition, and how the publication has grown over time. Baudelaire would be proud.
[body_image width='2000' height='1500' path='images/content-images/2015/03/02/' crop='images/content-images-crops/2015/03/02/' filename='flaneur-magazine-will-turn-your-street-into-a-print-magazine-body-image-1425325162.jpeg' id='32119']

The staff of 'Flaneur.' From left: Fabian Saul, Michelle Phillips, Grashina Gabelmann, Johannes Conrad, friend, and Ricarda Messner.

VICE: What inspired you to create a magazine?
Ricarda Messner: It was always pretty clear to me when I graduated that I always wanted to do something on my own. I never really knew what I would end up doing, but I always just had this feeling that I didn't see myself in this nine to five job. And then I came back from New York and the plan, the love, didn't work out. I was inspired by movies.

I always loved mixing also disciplines with each other, you know? And this is also what the magazine reflects. It has photography, it has architecture, it plays around with different layers. It made sense to me to try the concept with one-street-per-issue in a print format.

What inspired the one-street-per-issue theme?
Messner: It had to do with returning to Berlin and rediscovering a town that I never really liked before. New York was my thing, and I always envisioned myself there. Then I was back again in Berlin, and I knew I had to have a closer look at it.

I remember that I was looking out the windows at my parents' place a lot because it was so quiet compared to New York. I kept thinking about how my neighbor must have a completely different relationship to the street I spent 12 years of my life living on, and was now staring at out the window once again. And there was something interesting about taking something concrete—literally and figuratively, in this case—but then exploring it through a variety of forms with a sense of freedom. In the end, the street is being used as a storyteller with Flaneur. And that's the thing: When you walk down a street, you can't sum it up.

How has the magazine evolved since it began?
Messner: Maybe two weeks ago, G and I sat down to discuss what we're learning from issue to issue—what we're really doing here, or what this thing is. We're realizing more and more that we're not a classic or traditional magazine, and we're also not going to communicate this. It should be clear from opening the front page.

Grashina Gabelmann: This guy Ricarda originally partnered with—who's no longer involved with the magazine—wanted the end of every article to include something like a shop listing, address, map, etc. It would have been very travel guide–y. As I got more involved, I realized this was not the direction I wanted to be going in. It's not very interesting, and I think Ricarda felt that way as well. And then when our other editor Fabian came in, Flaneur got its literary twist. Fabian is integral to the conceptual and abstract aspects. He studied philosophy. So he brings in this literary, artistic feel.

[body_image width='837' height='546' path='images/content-images/2015/02/28/' crop='images/content-images-crops/2015/02/28/' filename='flaneur-body-image-1425150170.png' id='31725']

[body_image width='837' height='544' path='images/content-images/2015/02/28/' crop='images/content-images-crops/2015/02/28/' filename='flaneur-body-image-1425150523.png' id='31732']

Images from issue four of 'Flaneur.'

Can you tell me about this upcoming issue, number four in Rome?
Gabelmann: Rome was really a strange, unique experience. Berlin and Montreal are cities that have a strong cultural network. There's money and support for artists there, and both attract young people who make art. Leipzig has a weird underdog thing, which I think you can feel by reading our issue on it. But Rome is this ancient city that has such a history of art and culture, and it's really struggling to be modern. It was the first city where we felt that people actually needed our presence—even if that sounds patronizing or dickish.

Messner: Well, we offered some Romans a platform to talk about their home to people outside Rome.

Grashina: Yes, not to belittle anyone, but we did offer this. We organized a performance piece in Rome, and this one man described to us how the city is so fucking boring, so dry, and you can't even touch the ruins. There's no way of interacting with the city. It's like a live, sprawling museum, and Romans feel really trapped, in a way. He said something like, "I really want to turn the city into lakes so we can actually do something with the ruins." And so we said OK, yeah, let's do it.

Within two weeks, we had this performance planned. We printed out all these posters and signs that said something like "Rome is a boring and dry; Romans want water," and put them around the ruins. Then we made a little model—like a mini ruin—and put water in it with fish and had that in front of the ruin. We asked every passerby, "Hey, don't you want this to be a lake? How much water do you want to donate to turn this into a lake?" There was a fountain right next to the lake, so every time someone signed the petition, they had to take water from it and pour it into the miniature ruins to symbolically start the lake. So we got people to pour in water, and then people were wearing bathing suits and towels and it became this public celebration and performance. The reactions from the Italian people who helped us were so overwhelmingly positive. They said, "Hey, we haven't done anything like this in months, or even years. We really haven't had the motivation or drive."

Messner: This project is documented in issue four. We videoed everything, so, we'll have a little documentary online, and an article in print. We'll include the posters and the scribbles and the behind-the-scenes details of creating this performance piece.

[body_image width='833' height='540' path='images/content-images/2015/02/28/' crop='images/content-images-crops/2015/02/28/' filename='flaneur-body-image-1425150237.png' id='31726']

[body_image width='839' height='547' path='images/content-images/2015/02/28/' crop='images/content-images-crops/2015/02/28/' filename='flaneur-body-image-1425150269.png' id='31727']

Documentation of the water performance piece from issue four.

On the back of the book, the abstract or manifesto makes it clear that you guys aren't trying to capture the essence of a street or say, "This is it. This is Rome all summed up." Can you expand on that idea?
Messner: You have to have this kind of mentality, because we're not from Rome. We only spent two months in Montreal—and even less time in Leipzig. What can we tell them about their city, after all? It's more about the discussion and the constant exchanged ideas related to an experience in a certain place. The artists who contribute work for Flaneur come from many disciplines and countries, and they are really free to create whatever they want.

How have people from each city responded to the Flaneur issues focused on their homes?
Messner: In Leipzig, I felt like the initial response was, "Oh, these hipsters are coming and they're fucking ruining our town." They'd flick through the magazine and say, "Oh, I would have done this differently."

Gabelmann: Well, like, yeah, then you make a magazine. But anyway, their attitude to the final thing really matched our experience in the city. Our actual contributors were super happy with the result, but I think we sold 20 magazines at the launch party—not a big success. I don't know about Rome, but I think they will be proud.

You've had four issues now on four distinctly different streets in four cities. Why did you choose those specific streets in each city?
Gabelmann: We had never been to Rome before, so we behaved like newborn children there. It was a very different approach, compared to the Berlin issue, which was very personal. Close to the Coliseum is the old political center of Rome. Basically from there to the river is a main traffic spot and it's busy. It's a street filled with both Romans and tourists all the time. So Fabian and I were in Rome for a week in the summer to find our street, and we had a really difficult time picking one at first.

At the end of the week, we met an architect and he said to us, "Oh, Corso Vittorio has something from every epoch of architecture and it's interesting." And we had no idea which street he was talking about. He replied, "That's impossible, you have to pass that street to go anywhere." We googled it and realized we were on that street three times a day, every day. But since it's so hectic and all the points of interests are on little side streets, we never looked it up and actually took in the street.

So that was the initial interest: How can a street that's so busy and so important be that easy to ignore? At first, most Romans were irritated and asked us, why would you choose to represent Rome with that ugly street? And then on second thought, they were like, "Oh, OK, actually that's pretty interesting." Think of it this way: I'd love to do Broadway in New York. How cool would it be to take the most annoying street where everyone thinks there's nothing left to discover, and then focus on that place and find something new in it?

[body_image width='1000' height='714' path='images/content-images/2015/03/02/' crop='images/content-images-crops/2015/03/02/' filename='flaneur-magazine-will-turn-your-street-into-a-print-magazine-body-image-1425327641.jpg' id='32131']

[body_image width='1444' height='1083' path='images/content-images/2015/02/28/' crop='images/content-images-crops/2015/02/28/' filename='flaneur-body-image-1425150420.jpg' id='31729']

[body_image width='836' height='545' path='images/content-images/2015/02/28/' crop='images/content-images-crops/2015/02/28/' filename='flaneur-body-image-1425150409.png' id='31728']

Images from issues three and four of 'Flaneur.'

What do you think has succeeded most about Flaneur so far?
Messner: Well, it's independent and I can also give the contributors and designers freedom to come up with crazy things. This is kind of my prime goal as a publisher: to offer this independent platform for these creative people to go wild with, for as long as possible.

Even our designers Michelle Philips and Johannes Conrad come to these towns with us, and this is why every issue of Flaneur looks different. They each have their own design voice, plus you can see that we play with the medium as well—there are fold-outs, different sorts of paper, and various art styles and mediums in each issue that make sense just for that issue.

Gabelmann: I think another big thing is that we don't go to Rome and interview an artist about his work, and then publish some photos of his work that's been in galleries, alongside the interview. But rather, we meet that artist and then come up with a concept with him on the street—like that performance piece—which is specifically conceived for Flaneur

I always think about one of my first lectures at university where the professor explained that a magazine is just something that holds something. Like, a gun has a magazine case. A magazine is a vessel. I don't think that Flaneur actually really is a magazine. I think it's just that we chose to present these streets in the magazine format.

[body_image width='1200' height='800' path='images/content-images/2015/03/02/' crop='images/content-images-crops/2015/03/02/' filename='flaneur-magazine-will-turn-your-street-into-a-print-magazine-body-image-1425327658.jpg' id='32132']

[body_image width='839' height='547' path='images/content-images/2015/02/28/' crop='images/content-images-crops/2015/02/28/' filename='flaneur-body-image-1425150498.png' id='31731']

[body_image width='651' height='463' path='images/content-images/2015/02/28/' crop='images/content-images-crops/2015/02/28/' filename='flaneur-body-image-1425150480.png' id='31730']

Flaneur is sold at MoMA PS1 and McNally Jackson's in New York and at the Tate Modern in London. For more distributors and to purchase online, visit Flaneur's website.

Follow Zach on Twitter.

Saving Burma’s Child Soldiers

$
0
0


Arkar Min, a former child soldier, works on the Yangon River for a fisherman who is a big fan of the Chelsea soccer club and makes his employees wear the team's jersey as a uniform. All photos by the author

The sun is sinking into the Yangon River, one of Burma's main arteries. It is dotted with small boats on their way to dusky moorings. Arkar Min, 21, rides a water taxi with seven men, all of them silent. They've spent the day hauling fish into trucks. Now they rest against one another, backs between knees, arms around shoulders, heads on laps, lulled by the rhythmic thump of the engine.

Arkar Min has worked on Yangon's docks since his release from the Tatmadaw, Burma's armed forces, six years ago. He left school at the age of eight to help his struggling family. On the way home from his factory job, a man approached him, asking whether he'd like to earn better money as a driver. "I was so happy that I was going to learn to drive," he says quietly, his eyes trained on the ember of his cigarette. His father, Tin Win, wanted him to be a farmer, but "the only thing that excited me then was driving fast."

Arkar Min and the man left immediately. They stopped for snacks, two identical jam pastries. Arkar Min didn't notice that his had been opened previously. It was likely drugged and made him drowsy, and he woke up the next afternoon. The man, a civilian broker working for the army, had collected $80 for delivering a new recruit and was long gone.

Living under armed guard, Arkar Min received one meal a day—a bowl of rice with some oil and salt. He had no bed and slept on the concrete, using his lungi as a pillow. There were six other conscripts, most of them 15; the eldest was 17. None of them had joined voluntarily—they'd been offered work, hoodwinked, kidnapped, and sold into service.

Arkar Min's father, Tin Win, had retired from the army—he'd been a sergeant for most of his life—and quickly realized what had happened. He knew where new recruits were sent: to a base near Shwedagon Pagoda, Yangon's central Buddhist temple. He went to the police, who did nothing. Arkar Min says that "the police wouldn't help until my father mentioned the International Labor Organization." The ILO is a group that works alongside the United Nations to free underage soldiers.


Thein Myint works for the Child Protection Organization, an NGO that connects families to larger international groups such as the International Labor Organization.

Today Arkar Min sits on the floor of Thein Myint's bamboo hut in his home village of Dine Su, his legs pulled up to his chest. He is surrounded by villagers desperate to reclaim their stolen sons. They crowd the tiny space in the shantytown on the edge of the Yangon, the men spitting betel juice onto the worn floor, the women fanning one another to keep cool. Thein Myint works for the Child Protection Organization, an NGO that connects families to larger international organizations such as the ILO. She also looks for kidnapped boys in the 12 army training camps across Burma. If their location is unknown, Thein Myint searches for them on foot. Systematically she bribes her way into each base with meat or fish for the malnourished guards, in hopes of finding the children.

She is small, hunched, and "old enough to retire," she tells me. With short black hair, cheeks painted white with the traditional thanaka paste, and calm eyes, she has a temperament that is at once stern and caring. Twelve years ago, she moved to Dine Su after the government razed her 12-acre farm to make way for a luxury golf course. "It is in my nature to help needy people and people who are in trouble," she says. "This work demands a lot of love and sacrifice.

"Times have changed," Thein Myint says. There has been steady pressure on the Myanmar Army and non-state militias to fall in line with the Association of Southeast Asian Nations, human rights recommendations, and ILO conventions. The armies are making small acts of compromise in appeasement, and during the final few months of 2014 they increased their releases. "There is international pressure now regarding forced labor, child labor," Thein Myint says firmly. "They can't keep doing it."

In 2012, at the encouragement of UNICEF, the ILO, and Save the Children, the Burmese government and the United Nations signed a joint plan of action outlining terms for the gradual release of child soldiers from the Tatmadaw, including fighters over 18 who were recruited as minors. The document also outlines accountability measures for offending officers and brokers.

In November, the Myanmar Army released 80 child soldiers from active service, bringing the total number of freed minors to 845 since 2007. Slowly, soldiers who were forcibly recruited as children are returning to their villages, to families who have long thought them dead.

Dine Su contains an army base, a shipping port, and factories. Its bamboo, mud, swaying pampas grass, and dusty football pitches match the landscape of many poor settlements throughout the country. Tracks between huts are paved with broken bricks, stepping stones for crossing puddles, or bags of cement. Many of its residents have come here from faraway, victims of government land grabs. An illegal settlement in the eyes of the law, Dine Su is especially susceptible to exploitation by authorities. "In the past I've rescued three boys from this village from the military," Thein Myint says. "Most are struggling financially."


Tun Tun Win's army ID card, proof that he's been discharged legally. While the army usually doesn't begin awarding pensions until soldiers are 60 years old, Tun Tun Win is drawing his now, at the age of 30, receiving $27 a month.

Police typically arrest village boys for being out too late or committing a petty crime. Sometimes civilian brokers offering better work lure the boys in, like in Arkar Min's case. Intimidation is the norm, and the boys are physically and psychologically pressured into signing up. Fake national registration cards are issued that state they are 18, the legal minimum to join. If recruits are less than 100 pounds, they're force-fed bananas and water until they meet the weight requirement. After four months of training, they are shipped to a remote post, often on the front lines.

The ILO's Forced Labor Convention of 1930, to which Burma is a signatory, defines underage recruitment as a form of forced labor. This enables the ILO to assist those who were recruited underage, "whether years previously, or those still considered child soldiers," says Steve Marshall, an ILO liaison officer. In 1991, Burma also ratified the Convention on the Rights of the Child, agreeing to protect minors from participating in war. And in 2007, the ILO and the Burmese government agreed upon the Forced Labor Complaint Mechanism, a system designed to offer victims of forced labor a platform for release without fear of retaliation.

Since 2007, the ILO has received 1,260 reports of underage recruitment by the Tatmadaw. "The numbers of complaints increased exponentially over time, as public awareness and confidence grew," says Marshall. Four hundred eighty-five of these underage recruits have been discharged. Seven died before their releases could be secured. Under the 2012 joint plan of action, there have been 472 discharges, which include 112 of the aforementioned ILO cases.

These developments notwithstanding, recruitment of underage males is still commonplace. The Tatmadaw were formally created just after Burma gained independence from Britain in January 1948. The Burma Campaign, one of World War II's bloodiest offensives, had ravaged the land and the economy, which might explain why Burma chose not to become a member of the Commonwealth of Nations, a voluntary organization of 53 countries, mostly territories of the former British Empire, united by shared history and ideas on democracy and human rights. It was a fragile and short-lived independence: In 1962, General Ne Win staged a coup, and since then the country has never seen peace. Ne Win's regime faced routine challenges from its citizens, culminating in the 8888 Uprising of August 8, 1988. After protests by students at Yangon's Institute of Technology, Ne Win called for the closure of universities, and the ranks of demonstrators swelled to include ethnic minorities, Buddhists, Muslims, students, and workers. The military killed thousands of civilians. Soon after, the junta decided to shed the colonial associations of the country's name, rebranding the Socialist Republic of the Union of Burma as the Union of Myanmar in 1989. In 1997, the junta changed its own name, from the State Law and Order Restoration Council to the State Peace and Development Council. Cyclone Nargis hit in 2008, leaving up to 1 million people homeless. Throughout, the Tatmadaw has been in constant combat with as many as 20 armed resistance groups at a time. Slowly, tentative ceasefires are being made, with non-state armies beginning to stand down fully.

Prior to 1988, most recruits to the Burmese army were volunteers over the age of 18. But after the uprising, the military was less popular than ever. The Tatmadaw now relies heavily on coerced manpower—or the small bodies of kidnapped boys—to achieve its ends, since modern weaponry has been difficult to obtain because of international arms sanctions imposed by many countries against the present regime.

In 2013 and 2014, the ILO received complaints of 69 cases of underage recruitment. Often existing soldiers will be denied leave unless they come back with one or two new recruits. Other soldiers and civilian brokers are incentivized by cash and in-kind rewards. The current rate is $80 per conscript—the equivalent of four months of sergeant-rank wages. Sometimes recruits are exchanged for bags of rice or oil.

When a child enters the army, his education stops. When he is released, he begins again at square one. With limited education, often lacking vocational skills, ex-soldiers struggle to reintegrate into working life. "The soldiers come back unemployed," Thein Myint says. "They take whatever job they can find, usually manual labor. Those whose family can afford it may start up a business."

When soldiers are asked by aid workers what type of job they'd like, the deprivation they've experienced means they typically don't have an answer. So it's decided for them—they are bought some pigs because their father was a pig farmer, or a trishaw because they earned money that way when they were young. Save the Children used to offer an investment of around $100 to returning veterans (though the charity officially denies this). But as funding dries up, this is happening less. Government programs for reintegration exist too, offering routes for returning soldiers to reenter the education system, but for Burma's stunted veterans, the basic requirements for participation are often too high.


A bird caught by a betel salesman is held captive with a piece of plastic string at Yangon's train station, one of the Myanmar Army's favorite forced- recruitment grounds.

Just outside of Dine Su, another of Thein Myint's success stories, Kyaw Thura, has returned to his mother. Kyaw Thura pours tea sweetened with condensed milk as he describes the guerrilla fighting he saw on the front lines and his defection to the enemy, the Karen National Union (KNU)—how they faked his death on a wooden crucifix, with animal blood and entrails, and how he lived in hiding from the Myanmar Army. He speaks in an even tone, but his pauses are vacant. He recalls being sent to Mon State for four months of training. "There were rocks in the soup and sand in the rice," he says. "I missed home terribly." Deployed to the jungle, he and his squad camped in tents at night and hunted monkeys and pigs to add to their inadequate rations.

Fearing for his life, he deserted with two friends. Without weapons or money, they went over to the KNU, whose leaders gave them a choice: join the rebels for pay and rations, or leave and try to make it to the Thai border. They opted to break for the border.

In Thailand, Kyaw Thura says, he "couldn't move. There were people searching everywhere for me," he says. Time passed, and he eventually found work in Mae Sot as a welder, met a girl, married, and fathered Thant Zin, now four years old.

He came back to Yangon to find his mother. Although the ILO gave him a letter of protection, he was arrested by the army anyway, sentenced to two years and six months for deserting, and jailed in Hpa'an. "Conditions were better than when I was in the army," he says wryly. "The food was better. We were able to exercise. We farmed and made bricks."

Living in his mother's house with his son, he is seeking compensation from the military for wrongful arrest. Little Thant Zin climbs into his lap and plays with a plastic motorcycle. Kyaw Thura was gone for so long that his son now calls him "uncle."

Tun Tun Win is 30. At 14, he was sold to the Tatmadaw. He didn't give them his full name. "I wanted to keep some of my identity for myself," he says, "so I told them I was called just Tun Tun." In a camp in the jungle near Mandalay, he tattooed the last part of his name into his forearm using a blunt needle, soot, and juice from a betel nut—"Win" inside a heart with two crossed swords behind it. He spent most of his time repairing tanks or on security detail, moving from base to base. "I learned how to drive, shoot, do security, not much else." His pay was $4.50 a month.

Thirteen years later, he rents a small house from his brother in the village where he grew up. He lives with his two-year-old daughter, who suffers from malnutrition, and his five-year-old son. A year ago, his wife left him with the children. "She has a gambling problem," he says. "She was not good for the kids." His eldest sister pitches in.

With $100 from Save the Children, he set up a small library in front of his house, renting books and magazines to villagers for ten cents a day. "I want to be my own boss now," he says. His father loaned him money to buy a small motorcycle, which he hopes to use as a taxi. "I don't have any ill feelings toward army recruiters. Karma will be their judgment. I have freedom now. In the army I was renting my body."

This story was made possible with funding from the Pulitzer Center on Crisis Reporting.


A Black Teen, a White Cop, and a Photo That Changed the Civil Rights Movement

$
0
0
A Black Teen, a White Cop, and a Photo That Changed the Civil Rights Movement

The Jokes Are Coming From Inside the House: Canadian Comics Embrace the Apartment Show

$
0
0

[body_image width='1274' height='718' path='images/content-images/2015/03/03/' crop='images/content-images-crops/2015/03/03/' filename='the-jokes-are-coming-from-inside-the-house-canadian-comics-embrace-the-apartment-show-687-body-image-1425400078.jpg' id='32577']

Screenshot via YouTube

The "brain drain" of Canadian comedy talent lured to the US in search of laughs and a decent paycheck is a longstanding free-trade beef that this country has had with our neighbour to the south. But for every Mike Myers or Jim Carrey or Samantha Bee or Catherine O'Hara or Will Arnett (etc., you get the picture), there are hundreds, if not thousands, of funny folks who are stuck grinding out jokes in (and about) the frozen tundra in which they live. For many of them, "making it" in the US is what legitimizes you—not only in the eyes of American audiences, agents and bookers, but in the eyes of the Canadian public as well.

"I got into a festival in the States a few years ago and it felt like the comedy equivalent of getting my braces off," said Katie-Ellen Humphries, a Vancouver-based stand-up.

"And you got back and your teeth were all slimy?" interjected fellow VanCity funnyman Ivan Decker.

"Well, there's that."

[youtube src='//www.youtube.com/embed/I482BUNStYo' width='500' height='281']

In an effort to gain more exposure on their home turf, Decker, 29, and Humphries, 32, recently performed in some dude's Vancouver apartment, alongside Graham Clarke (HBO's Funny As Hell) and host Matthew Clarke (Convos With My 2-Year-Old). And there are plans to roll out to more random apartments with new talent in other major Canadian cities soon under the banner of Live @ The Apt (Canada), a live show and web series filmed in—you guessed it—people's apartments.

While it may seem like the Canadian comedy scene has sunk so low that comedians have resorted to performing in friends-of-friends' (sometimes) crummy apartments to get a leg up, people are digging the concept—and it just might help put more Canuck comedy on the map. Or, at least, on a map that extends below the border.

"It's about giving people a platform and an opportunity," said the show's creator and executive producer Drew Miller, a 27-year-old Montreal native who started Live @ The Apt in his East Village fifth-floor walk-up in 2013. "We managed to get about 30 to 40 people. It was an experiment, but it worked. So we kept going."

Nearly two years later, Live @ The Apt has followed Miller to a new pad in Williamsburg, Brooklyn. Barring a few noise complaints and comics occasionally making cracks at crowds that resembled the cast of HBO's Girls, Miller has managed to take Live @ The Apt beyond his personal digs and all over New York City—from rooftop patios to Chinatown lofts, borrowing spaces or renting them from AirBnB.

[youtube src='//www.youtube.com/embed/AN1AqDW4iHA' width='500' height='281']

Audiences have grown (sometimes to upwards of 100 people), a waitlist has formed, and bigger-name performers, like Hannibal Buress and Saturday Night Live's Sasheer Zamata, have started turning up. YouTube views are also rising by impressive measures, like literally by 1,000 per cent, as Miller says, pointing to a video of The Lucas Brothers, which shot up to over 28,000 views after the pair appeared in the movie 22 Jump Street.

It ain't Madison Square Garden, though. Comedian Sabrina Jalees called performing at Live @ The Apt a "safety hazard" while Liza Treyger referenced "subtle hints of pubic hair on the toilet seat." But when the stage is beside a refrigerator, doors are accessed by buzzing an intercom, the sign is cardboard, and the beer is free, every venue feels as intimate as home.

And home is exactly where Miller wanted to take the project next. "I know the deal. It's really hard to get here. It has nothing to do with talent. It's just a matter of location. You shouldn't have to friggin' have a mom who's from America just to break out," he said of the show's Canadian debut. Miller's own mother is American. "It shouldn't come down to whether you have connections in government."

It's hardly surprising that underground initiatives like Live @ The Apt have popped up in Canada. First, the O-1 (extraordinary ability) VISA comedians require to work in the US can take several months and thousands of dollars to obtain. Meanwhile, in Canada, networks come down to two main players: Bell Media and CBC, neither of which produce much successful original comedic programming. For instance, a quick perusal of the Bell-owned Comedy Network (the Canadian version of Comedy Central) website reveals that of the 53 shows currently on their roster, around ten are Canadian. That's less than 20 percent.

Among those original shows is Corner Gas, which has been hailed the most successful Canadian TV series in recent times—comedic or otherwise—drawing an average of one million viewers per episode. It even recently spawned its own feature film. Even then, two thirds of the movie's $8.5-million budget had to come from government support to make it feasible.

By comparison, American sitcom The Big Bang Theory—Canada's most-watched series for several years running—attracts 20 million US viewers per episode and pays its three main actors $1 million per episode for seasons that average 20 episodes. Three episodes of the three actors just standing there and you'd have yourself the Corner Gas movie and then some.

[youtube src='//www.youtube.com/embed/oD-j2C9Uc8k' width='500' height='281']

It's not that Canada doesn't have comedic roots. It does, particularly in the sketch comedy genre. This Hour Has 22 Minutes is still ticking and has been for 22 seasons. But revisiting the glory days of Kids in the Hall are unlikely, considering the budget cuts CBC has been enduring for years.

Not that those classics ever came close to reaching Big Bang Theory-level viewership. That would require getting to a point wherein 57 percent of the population considered "Chicken Cannon" a can't-miss.

"To get reach across Canada it's just very different because most of the media Canadians consume is American," said Decker. "Canadian networks don't have the budget to take as many risks so everything produced in Canada seems to be quite safe." He noted some local clubs book American acts simply because that's what sells. And who's to blame?

The comedy economy is similar outside the TV industry, too.

There's just one major festival in Canada, Just For Laughs, featuring only a single event aimed at nurturing Canadian stand-up, "The Homegrown Comic Competition." Popularity-wise, that show pales in comparison to its non-Canadian counterpart, "New Faces."

And, in terms of clubs, there are merely two directions to choose, separated by a thick loyalty-driven divider: sign with Yuk Yuk's or perform at independent clubs. But not both. That's fine if you live in a metropolis like Toronto or Vancouver, where Humphries said "there are anywhere from one to four independent stand-up shows in bars and theatres around town every weeknight, plus club shows Tuesday through Saturday."

It's not so fine if you live in, say, Lethridge, Alberta, where Decker said, "You'll only have the opportunity to get on stage about once a week max... It would be like going to the gym once a month and expecting huge muscles." On the bright side, you'd have easy access to the oil rig camps in Alberta, and up north, there are popular performance spots for some Canadian comics, according to Decker.

As any indie-rock band will tell you, even touring this vast expanse we call Canada poses significant challenges. Jameson Parker, Live @ The Apt's lead Canadian producer, said: "You almost wish there were the same rules as with music where on the radio you have to play [a certain amount of CRTC mandated] Canadian content."

The question is: Should Canada strive to cultivate its own solid comedic infrastructure built to retain talent? Or should we accept that talent is a Canadian export? As Miller put it: "If it's a choice between the NBA and the development league, you're going to choose the NBA—no matter how horrible it seems."

But there is hope. Miller explained that through Live @ The Apt he's not just jumping aboard the shifting-to-digital media landscape, he's leveraging it so that comedy of all origins comes out on top. For example, he's creating comedy content made specifically for the web rather than ripped from TV and put online like a lot of other stuff out there. Which means even up-and-comers who aren't big enough to warrant their own television spots have not only an outlet but also quality clips. He's taking advantage of the freedom to feature as many diverse voices as possible. And, most of all, in a predominantly virtual world, he's factoring in nostalgia for that feeling of looking around a room like, "Woah. We're all in this together, sharing a unique experience no one else will ever have."

"When I came up with the idea I was going to a host music shows, actually. For some reason, no one had ever applied the DIY edge of concerts to comedy shows and it baffled me. Why can I go see a band play at a loft in Bushwick yet comedy was always in the same club or the same bar with the standard two-drink minimum? It was cheesy," he said, calling Live @ The Apt half-comedy show, half-house party, also stressing that it's free. "We've gotten hundreds of emails from people telling us they saw our videos on YouTube and they'd love to see a show when they are in NYC. That's what sets us apart from being just a web series."

Maybe that's why Live @ The Apt has worked so far. It sits in a sort-of sweet spot between being a hip, alt, word-of-mouth-only event and being totally accessible to anyone with a computer at the same time.

Live @ The Apt's Canadian expansion comes on the heels of SNL's 40th anniversary special, the most watched prime-time telecast in 10 years, prompting questions like: Where would comedy be if SNL founder Lorne Michaels had run out of packing tape and been like, "Guess I'll stay in Toronto"?

"The godfather of American comedy is Canadian and nobody talks about that," Miller told me. If Miller has his way, Live @ The Apt will change that for the next generation of comics. One crummy apartment at a time.

Follow Ilana Belfer on Twitter.

How Oxbridge Students Felt About Kanye West Before He Lectured Them Last Night

$
0
0

[body_image width='700' height='467' path='images/content-images/2015/03/03/' crop='images/content-images-crops/2015/03/03/' filename='kanye-west-came-to-oxford-university-and-i-didn39t-get-to-see-him-909-body-image-1425377141.jpg' id='32331']Look how fucking hyped this crowd is. Photos by Lauren O'Neill

This post originally appeared on VICE UK.

Picture the scene. It's 11 PM on a Sunday evening. I'm in my uni bedroom in Oxford, watching an episode of Saturday Night Live and flicking between social networks, as a person of my age and lack of direction is wont to do. There's a particularly boring bit on SNL and I tab across to Facebook. And then it happens. My timeline confronts me with an event called "Kanye West Speaks to the Oxford Guild Society – 02/03/15."

Oxford University hosts quite a lot of high-profile speakers, but there's high-profile, and then there's Kanye. Literal Kanye West. The man who turned bragging into an art form. And the fact that such a huge talk—open only to Oxford students—had been announced merely 16 hours before it was due to begin sent the Oxford student body as a whole into total chaos.

The event was being hosted by the Oxford Guild, a society geared specifically to people interested in business, so it's safe to say this is the most interesting thing to happen to them in their 120-year history. At first, most assumed this was an elaborate university prank, but as event "attending" numbers started to rise and the ticket process was properly outlined—three random ballots, taking place at midnight, 2 AM, and 9 AM—Oxford began to believe that Yeezus really was coming to preach. Tickets, which cost a measly $6, were slowly handed out, but despite offering up my soul in exchange for one (resales, sadly, were banned), I was not one of the lucky few.

So I was faced with a dilemma—when the world's biggest musician graces the world's most boring town with his presence and you miss out on it, what do you do? The answer I came up with was this: You go and interview the people who did get tickets, before sitting on a gross bench and watching them all go inside, as you hold back tears of rage.

[body_image width='700' height='467' path='images/content-images/2015/03/03/' crop='images/content-images-crops/2015/03/03/' filename='kanye-west-came-to-oxford-university-and-i-didn39t-get-to-see-him-909-body-image-1425376438.jpg' id='32325']

Kanye's talk took place at Oxford's Museum of Natural History, which, coincidentally, is just up the road from where I live, so I got there a bit early to talk to some of the chosen ones about their feelings on what they were about to see.

[body_image width='700' height='467' path='images/content-images/2015/03/03/' crop='images/content-images-crops/2015/03/03/' filename='kanye-west-came-to-oxford-university-and-i-didn39t-get-to-see-him-909-body-image-1425376452.jpg' id='32326']Thomas, Ana, and Damola

What was your reaction when the event came up on Facebook?
Damola: He broke the internet.

Do you think it's important that Kanye has come to speak at Oxford in particular?
I don't know, because some people see him and Kim as anti-intellectual, so it's nice that he's being invited into this space and is able to capture the whole of Oxford's population.

[body_image width='700' height='467' path='images/content-images/2015/03/03/' crop='images/content-images-crops/2015/03/03/' filename='kanye-west-came-to-oxford-university-and-i-didn39t-get-to-see-him-909-body-image-1425376478.jpg' id='32327']Audrey, Dylan, Jacob, Sam, and Tabby

What do you think Kanye's gonna talk about?
Sam: I think he's here to inspire the next generation of English businessmen and fashion designers. Which is what we all are. And I think my brother is also a budding rapper.
Jacob: Kanye inspired my career.

You could ask whether he'll let you be his hype man.
Jacob: In the medium of rap.
Sam: It's interesting to just see. Because he's got so many things going on at the moment. He's got the trainers, he's about to release a new album—it'll be interesting to see what his focus is. It'll also be interesting to know why he's come here, because he doesn't really just give public audiences.

Do you have any questions you want to ask Kanye?
Jacob: Does he like fish sticks?

[body_image width='700' height='467' path='images/content-images/2015/03/03/' crop='images/content-images-crops/2015/03/03/' filename='kanye-west-came-to-oxford-university-and-i-didn39t-get-to-see-him-909-body-image-1425376565.jpg' id='32328']Nina and Ogemdi

What do you think the significance is of Kanye coming to Oxford University specifically?
Ogemdi: I think he's also spoken at Harvard, at the architecture school. It seems like he's more in a twist where he wants to enter academia in a really specific way.
Nina: Also, I think his albums are so conceptual that he wants to be taken to be thinking about his music, and actually having that legitimacy, as opposed to just having this aesthetic. I think he wants to talk about the aesthetic and show that there's been a massive thought process and plan throughout.

[body_image width='700' height='467' path='images/content-images/2015/03/03/' crop='images/content-images-crops/2015/03/03/' filename='kanye-west-came-to-oxford-university-and-i-didn39t-get-to-see-him-909-body-image-1425376588.jpg' id='32329']Joe and Anna

What are you expecting Kanye to discuss?
Joe: I think he'll probably talk about uni and life, in that sense of what you should do with your life more generally.
Anna: I'm hoping he does talk about that because everyone here is at a really stressful uni and thinks that's the way to be successful, but actually it might not be.

How do you guys feel about Kanye coming to Oxford?
Joe: I think it's brilliant. I just want to know what he's gonna talk about.
Anna: He's massive on trying to tell people that you don't need to go through uni and school to be successful.


The people I talked to raised some interesting points, and there was particular speculation around Kanye's motivation for coming to Oxford. Considering the eventual content of his talk—and of many of his recent discussions, including the interview with Zane Lowe a few days ago—which touched heavily on his artistic sufferings at the hands of classism and elitism, it's pretty ironic that he decided to come to the playground of so much elitism to talk about that.

In doing so, it's possible that he meant to challenge that system (this point of view holds a bit more weight when you know that the talk was filmed and will be put online for the public to watch). But it's also possible that he viewed speaking here as a symbol of his further legitimation as not only a rapper and musician, but as an artist and thinker in a more canonical sense.

Over the last year, Kanye has been on a very public quest for legitimacy, seeking out the establishment with the aim of entering it—he's now a respected fashion designer and people go to his concerts as much for the cultural commentary he screams from behind a mask as the music. His embrace of Oxford seems to be just another step in that quest. That a man who made his money and his name producing records and rapping brought one of the world's foremost academic institutions to a standstill yesterday is proof that he's achieving the approval he appears to seek, but also that he's breaking the boundaries of who and what we view as intellectually valid.

Despite minor discrepancies—such as the outrage he expressed in yesterday's talk about financial elitism in fashion, having recently designed trainers that retail at $400—Kanye's engagement with elitism is important. His visibility, and the visibility of everything he stands for, in established circles of academia, fashion, and social commentary can only really be a progressive thing, and I hope it develops and continues. Just as long as I get a ticket next time.

Follow Lauren on Twitter.

Climate Change Is Likely a Cause of the Civil War in Syria, Researchers Say

$
0
0
Climate Change Is Likely a Cause of the Civil War in Syria, Researchers Say

A Ugandan Filmmaker's Quest to Conquer the Planet with Low-Budget Action Movies

$
0
0

In late 2011, Alan Hofmanis sat in an East Village bar opposite an old friend, trying to sort out his life. Two days earlier, his girlfriend had dumped him right after he'd bought her an engagement ring. Before that, the 41-year-old had spent more than half his life working in film, but he hadn't followed any one path, instead immersing himself in cinematography, art direction, and sound editing. At 17, he'd slept in a Queens subway station in order to intern as a personal assistant on a television show. In his 20s, he drove to the Adirondacks and slept in his car for a month to be a part of the Lake Placid Film Festival. He eventually settled into organizing film festivals himself, but with a sense of unease. Now, approaching middle age, he had no fixed career goal, little hands-on experience with digital film technology, and no girlfriend.

Hoping to cheer Hofmanis up, his friend, an NGO worker who had spent time in Uganda, pulled out his smartphone and played a trailer for a film called Who Killed Captain Alex. Produced for about $200 by Isaac Nabwana, the founder of Uganda's first action-film company, Ramon Film Productions (RFP), it's a gloriously bonkers movie in which commandos target a ruthless gang of drug dealers called the Tiger Mafia, using martial arts and a variety of heavy munitions. When shot, characters erupt mists of CGI blood, like video-game fatalities. It made Hofmanis think of Buster Keaton, set in Africa.

[youtube src='//www.youtube.com/embed/BymeLkZ7GqM' width='640' height='480']

The trailer for 'Who Killed Captain Alex'

"When you're dissecting a film, especially one you don't know anything about, there are two things you're looking at," Hofmanis said. "What are they trying to do, and how are they doing it? Often you see something that's really slick but not very interesting. What you hope for is the opposite."

After watching 50 seconds of the trailer, he decided he was going to Uganda. He had saved $16,000 for a wedding and honeymoon, had twice that in available credit, and had stockpiled frequent-flier miles and vacation time from his film-programming job. That night he bought a ticket to Kampala, Uganda's capital, for $1,450.


The movie poster for 'Who Killed Captain Alex,' Uganda's first action film

On his first day in Kampala—a congested city of about 1.2 million—Hofmanis wandered Owino Market, a vast, umbrella-shaded bazaar far off the routes of Western tourists who pass through the city on their way to safari. His plan was to find Nabwana, but he needed some time to get oriented before starting on the hunt. He had no idea where Nabwana lived and wasn't even sure what he would want from a meeting if he did find him.

Suddenly, amid the throngs of people, he spotted a distant DVD seller wearing an RFP shirt.

He's in the end zone, Hofmanis thought. And I'm on the 50-yard line.

He dashed down narrow stall lanes to reach the mysterious stranger, who in turn—thinking a charging mzungu (the local term for a white Westerner) could mean only trouble—sprinted in the opposite direction.

Hofmanis cornered the man, and after mutual assurances (that the seller wasn't peddling pirated DVDs and Hofmanis wasn't an Interpol agent), the vendor admitted that he knew where Nabwana lived. The two then set out on a boda-boda, a motorcycle taxi, through the snarled flow of Kampala traffic.

Hofmanis arrived at Nabwana's house, called in through the open front door, and shouted to him with a concise sentence he'd practiced on the harrowing motorcycle ride: "Hi, my name is Alan, I'm from New York City, and I'd like to talk to you." Nabwana, a soft-spoken, genial man of 38, greeted him with a nonchalant handshake, as if mzungus popped by the house every day.

And indeed, Hofmanis discovered that two French documentarians had arrived just before him (they were working on a film about African cinema and had stopped by the house as a courtesy call). As the four men made awkward small talk in the studio, Hofmanis was annoyed that the Frenchmen used the phrase "indigenous film" to describe Nabwana's work, as if Captain Alex were interesting only as an anthropological footnote, not as cinema.

When the men left, Hofmanis and Nabwana talked film. Hofmanis peppered him with questions about his equipment, distribution, aesthetics, and influences. He was shocked to learn that Who Killed Captain Alex was one of more than 20 films that Nabwana had made under the auspices of his production company (because Nabwana didn't have the software to archive his films, he'd lost count of his own filmography long ago). Hofmanis realized that RFP, the entity behind Captain Alex, was a full studio.

His first ten action flicks, for example, used cow blood as a special effect. He switched to food coloring only after actors complained of stomachaches.

Since the company was founded in 2005, Nabwana's films have been seen by hundreds of thousands of African viewers. Even though the film isn't available outside Uganda, the YouTube trailer for Who Killed Captain Alex has garnered more than 2 million hits. Making films for big audiences on minuscule budgets has forced Nabwana to develop some innovative techniques. His first ten action flicks, for example, used cow blood as a special effect. He switched to food coloring only after actors complained of stomachaches. One developed brucellosis, a nasty zoonotic bacterial disease, and spent a week of delirium in the hospital. For another film, Bad Black, Nabwana and his crew raided a local clinic and outfitted the set with bloody gauze and used syringes.

The two men spoke for five hours. At one point, Nabwana told Hofmanis of plans for a future opus in which President Obama visits Uganda and gets kidnapped by cannibals. The theme was in line with RFP's other work, but the project was evidence of Nabwana's expanding ambitions: It would require real helicopters, even though one hour of flight time costs more than the budget of an entire RFP film.

"You know," Hofmanis said, "Coppola had problems with helicopters in Apocalypse Now."

Nabwana smiled and asked, "Who's Coppola?"


Kagolo—a.k.a. "Katogo" (or "Mixed Up")—dressed as a cannibal. Photos by Frédéric Noy

Last November, I visited Nabwana in Uganda. Wakaliga, the Kampala neighborhood where he lives and works, is bisected by Sir Albert Cook Road, a main artery clogged with minivans, trucks, and boda-bodas. The stench of diesel is overpowering. On the unnamed lane that leads to RFP, vehicle exhaust abruptly gives way to the smells of a slum: smoke, garbage, sewage. An open trench runs parallel to this road, snaking through the neighborhood until it splits into tributaries of liquid filth, some of which must be crossed on rickety planks.

His compound sits in one of the lowest and most flood-prone sections of Wakaliga. Nabwana built the main house himself, using bricks he baked by hand (he inherited the property from his grandfather). Just outside the back entrance is an open-hearth kitchen. Nabwana and his wife, Harriet, share the bedroom with their three young children, and in-laws and tenants dwell in the remaining rooms. All dozen people on the property share one outhouse. There is no running water.

Beyond the home a small parcel of land holds a rehearsal space, a recording studio, four back rooms for tenants, and a small shack that sells scrap metal. Across from this tract is the dump—a repository for dead animals, soiled diapers, and medical waste—where a patch of green cassava leaves offsets the slum's dominant colors of red and brown. Past this, in the far distance, stands Mutundwe Hill, a wealthy neighborhood that is rumored to house a Ugandan prince. In a needlessly cinematic touch, this hill always has electricity, while Wakaliga suffers frequent power outages.

Nabwana greeted me at his house, a one-story brick cottage that is the same shade of russet as the surrounding dirt. His closely trimmed goatee hides a boyish face, and heavy-lidded eyes make him seem weary. After several minutes of hearing him talk, however, I understood that this is a man who has tapped into an unlimited reserve of confidence. Even his attire marks him as a tireless self-promoter. Every morning during my visit, Nabwana dressed in a fresh blue-and-white RFP polo shirt. The studio's slogan—"The Best of the Best Movies!"—perfectly reflects his buoyant self-assurance.

We stepped through the door of his home to escape the fierce equatorial sun. Power had been out for days, and it took a moment for my eyes to adjust to the shade. He seemed defiantly cheerful about the outage.

"There are other challenges," he told me. "At least nowadays, power is stabilizing. You can have it for a week!"

The clutter of his studio surprised me. Several dilapidated sofas faced desks overflowing with computer parts, books, hard drives, clothes, random pieces of broken equipment, and many unrelated objects destined to become props in his films. There seemed to be just enough room for his Acer computer. The windows of the house have bars inside the glass, and he always sleeps with his video camera and CPU under his bed.

"During the day, there are no problems. At night, that's when we have problems."

On a stack of papers near the computer, I noticed a toy assault rifle still in a plastic wrapper reading rapid gun. It was a gift from a stranger; people often come by to donate toy guns that are then used in his films. The studio has a footlocker full of fake weapons, battered and cracked and slightly pathetic from years of action scenes.

"If we make them heavier, it's very easy for the actors to show that it's real," Nabwana said of his preference for using metal guns as props. "But if you make it light, no. That's why nowadays we don't use the plastic ones. We buy them to get the models. Then we copy and modify them." From molds based on cheap toys, the studio crafts its own metallic gun replicas. Nabwana mimicked the kick of a heavy fake weapon. Having actors pantomime this gesture with inferior ordnance is an unnecessary chore.


Ramon Film Productions artist Henry the Barbarian

Nabwana grew up during the brutal regime of Idi Amin, who, from 1971 to 1979, presided over the killing of 100,000 to 500,000 Ugandans. When the British government broke all diplomatic relations with the ruler, he added the abbreviation "CBE" to his title, for "Conqueror of the British Empire." Yet Nabwana, whose grandfather was a farmer who owned the land where RFP operates today, was spared most of this violence by sheer luck.

Nabwana's first knowledge of warfare instead came through American television shows. Growing up near Wakaliga, he would raptly watch Hawaii Five-0 and Logan's Run at night, on his family's TV, when electricity was off-peak and thus more reliable. As an adolescent, he sketched Chuck Norris—an actor he knew of only from a street mural—fighting alongside famous Ugandans. The first film to capture his imagination was 1978's Wild Geese, a British action-adventure about aging mercenaries in Central Africa. But he never saw the movie, Nabwana explained, instead hearing his brothers passionately describe the plot over and over again. It was cinema as oral history.

After Amin's ouster in 1979, TV stations ceased showing late-night programming, instead closing the day with a speech by Milton Obote, whom Amin had deposed eight years earlier. Obote's second reign would come to be defined by a brutal civil war waged by Yoweri Museveni, who led a coup against Obote in 1986 and has ruled since. Though Nabwana's family was again spared any direct violence, his grandfather was accused of supporting the rebels, and the Nabwana family nearly went bankrupt. As a result, Nabwana had to dig sand to pay his school fees. In these lean years, he witnessed government soldiers patrolling Kampala, gleefully posing for one another, emulating Arnold Schwarzenegger with real guns.

"I tell you," Nabwana said, "every Ugandan wants to act in an action movie."

Nabwana had always seen himself as an artist, and his entry into film was organic. The economic hardship of his teenage years had made him fiercely self-reliant, and he found it easy to master practical trades like welding and bricklaying. After his marriage and first child, he came to see film as an opportunity both artistic and financial. There was no epiphany. He simply grasped the twin advantages of his position. One, he had all the mental resources needed to direct. And two, there was an untapped market for non-formulaic Ugandan cinema—specifically action and horror—operating far outside the shadow cast by Nigeria's dominant "Nollywood" fare.

"I tell you," Nabwana said, "every Ugandan wants to act in an action movie."

At 33, he signed up for a six-month computer course. Knowing he could afford only a month, he audited other classes and assiduously pored over textbooks. After his month was up, he continued solo, scouring the internet for video tutorials. He bought motherboards, processors, and power supplies and learned how to assemble his own PCs and how to use a green screen.

Nabwana spent his mid 30s helping produce and shoot music videos. In 2009, he decided he could no longer wait to make his first full-fledged action film. He gathered actors by word of mouth, finding it easy to cast the mental script he'd prepared. News of the production spread quickly, not just in Kampala but in outlying towns and cities and across different tribes.

For Who Killed Captain Alex, actors supplied their own costumes, often buying them piecemeal in public markets. Nabwana drew on a spirit of constant improvisation, using house paint for alcoholic drinks and a modified car jack for his video camera's tripod mount. If he didn't have enough people for, say, an assault scene, he would place a mask on one of the actors and reuse the same person in a different shot. Filming with toy guns made passersby understandably nervous, and he learned to shoot quickly when on location. The entire film was shot and edited in January 2010.

The gun violence in Captain Alex—as in all of Nabwana's films—is meant to be comedic. Any Western viewer would be able to grasp this within a few minutes. Although he occasionally references the military scenes he glimpsed as a teen, his own influences are cinematic: Western action and Eastern martial arts.

Not that much of his local audience would catch any Obote-era allusions. The median age in Uganda is 15.5 years, and Nabwana specifically targets younger viewers. Most Ugandans (including every RFP actor except one) grew up long after the violence of Idi Amin and the civil war. Before Captain Alex, Ugandan action films had never been attempted because of cost—not because of any wish to avoid reliving old traumas.


Dauda Bisaso and Isaac Nabwana check the mount on the studio's jib, which Bisaso built from scratch.

At the time of my visit, Nabwana and Hofmanis were rushing to finish a remastered, English-language version of Who Killed Captain Alex to coincide with a Kickstarter campaign they hoped would bring in desperately needed capital. The campaign would ask for $160, just enough money to produce Nabwana's next big project, Tebaatusasula: Ebola. But the deliberately meager amount was both a clever publicity ploy and launching point for, they hoped, a significantly larger sum ($265,000 would get the studio land, equipment, vehicles, and the general means to function without interruption). It was all part of Nabwana's ambition to transform RFP from a relatively small operation into a global player with Hofmanis serving as the company's "ambassador to America."

But after a week the power was still out. Nabwana had made no progress on the Captain Alex edits. Torrential rains had filled the lanes leading to RFP with great pools of brown water, indistinguishable from the nearby sewage trench. I had come to see an action studio in full flourish but instead was witness to a scene of clichéd domesticity: kids playing, a mother scolding, dad in the den.

"When we have power, we feel invincible," Hofmanis told me when I met him in his quarters, one in a series of tin-roofed storage-locker spaces behind the Nabwana house. Inside, the room was dark without power, smelling like the cell of a man who has been unable to bathe in a long time. At night, rats use the overhead crossbeams as an overpass, stopping to gnaw on garbage in the darkness, occasionally dropping bones onto his bed.

Hofmanis has lost 40 pounds since his first trip to Uganda, three years ago. He has mad-scientist hair and rumpled clothes and resembles a man shipwrecked on a desert island. Drunks have lectured him in the street about his sloppy appearance. He has long since maxed out his credit cards and vaporized his savings. By the time of my visit, he didn't have enough cash to buy a bottle of Coke.

After charging his laptop at a nearby hair salon, he showed me what he'd been working on for the past few weeks: adding a so-called VJ track to the English-language version of Who Killed Captain Alex. Any doubts I'd had about the film's comedic intent were firmly laid to rest by the track. In Uganda, VJ stands for "video jokers," a concept native to Ugandan cinema halls, the shacks where audiences gather to watch films and soccer on modestly sized TV sets. Many halls feature a video joker to talk over Western-language films with a mic that can cut out the main audio track. The VJ is translator, emcee, roaster, booster, and travel guide in one. Hofmanis compares VJ tracks to the title cards in the silent comedies of a century ago.

In slow scenes, Bbatte blurts: "Action is coming, I promise you!" "One hell of a movie!" "Now expect the unexpectable." When the action gets going, he howls in triumph: "Warrior!" "Commando!" "The movie's on!" "Movie! Movie! Movie!"

The video joker for Captain Alex is Emmie Bbatte. His track interrupts the film's audio like a berserk director's commentary. His observations exhort, mock, and implore the characters and viewer simultaneously. In slow scenes, Bbatte blurts: "Action is coming, I promise you!" "One hell of a movie!" "Now expect the unexpectable." When the action gets going, he howls in triumph: "Warrior!" "Commando!" "The movie's on!" "Movie! Movie! Movie!" Sometimes he chortles, or hiccups in a James Brown grunt. It is Mystery Science Theater 3000 as narrated by a man who sounds like he's on bath salts.

Five minutes in, Bbatte is riffing the inner dialogues of different characters. After he jokes about a female reporter hitting on a policeman, Bbatte says, in his cop voice, "Eh, I prefer men." Hofmanis told me that he debated removing the joke. As of my visit, Uganda's brutal anti-gay laws were in flux. With one set of rules struck down by courts, a new law, still in draft stage, would criminalize any advocacy of "unnatural" sexual practices. Would Bbatte's joke be viewed as promotion of homosexuality?

The flip side was also risky. Outside Uganda, the joke could be perceived as homophobic. Captain Alex's rejection by several American film festivals had shocked Hofmanis, who'd helped prepare the applications. In hindsight, he believed that the studio would need to factor in the intense international backlash against Uganda's anti-gay political culture. It didn't help that the film could be seen as promoting violence in East Africa. Nor did the film's failure to conform to existing stereotypes about "African poverty films." Hofmanis recalled one festival programmer advising him—as if RFP were his studio, and not Nabwana's—to make "another Bicycle Thief."

Throughout my visit, it was hard to pin down Hofmanis's exact role at RFP. Like Nabwana, he wears many hats. At times he is clearly the bridge to the West; at other times, he is clearly Nabwana's protégé. Where Nabwana begins sentences with "I am telling you," Hofmanis says, "I tell ya." His most consistent role is that of booster, someone both amused and awed by the work he does. It's hard to imagine that Nabwana has a bigger fan than Hofmanis. With such unfailing zeal, the overall impression he gives is of a mix of Western visitor archetypes: He might dress like an NGO worker, but when Hofmanis talks, he is all missionary.

Hofmanis has been back and forth between New York and Kampala six times in the past two years. On one of his trips home, while working on his laptop at a coffee shop, he struck up a conversation with a young Columbia University student reading a book on African history. "You wanna see some African history?" Hofmanis asked, showing her the Captain Alex trailer on his laptop. The student watched the clip and asked, "How can you sleep at night?"

The implication was that the trailer glamorized violence in Africa. Yet while all five of its neighboring nations have seen their share of atrocity, terror, or war—including two genocides in as many decades—urban Uganda has been a stable, functional society since 1986. Even the rampages of Joseph Kony and his child soldiers were confined to northern towns and hinterlands. Nearly all the actors in Nabwana's films have grown up in a secure civilization where economics, not violence, defines their struggles. This, perhaps, is why RFP films are so popular—the country is ready to laugh at violence because, for the first time in its recent history, violence is foreign and far away.


Henry the Barbarian and Alan Hofmanis review edits in the rehearsal room, which was once a pigsty (literally).

Eventually the power came back on, though no one seemed to think it would last. I sat on the front porch and discussed distribution with Harriet, Nabwana's wife. While her husband projects a weary resolve—an iron determination to persevere—Harriet seems nonplussed by the challenges of Wakaliga. Every time I saw her, she was elegantly dressed and quick to laugh at some perceived joke (or faux pas). Besides raising three children and taking on as much editing side work as she can get, Harriet handles all the bookkeeping duties.

As with nearly every other aspect of Nabwana's filmmaking, RFP's distribution is homegrown and entirely original. No theaters have shown their movies. Instead, the actors themselves provide distribution, hawking DVDs in the street and sharing profits with the studio. Each film sells for between 2,000 and 3,000 shillings (between 70 cents and a dollar), depending on where and to whom it is sold. The profit margin is around 15 cents a disc.

If a film sells 10,000 copies, as many do, then the studio clears a total profit of $1,500. Rescue Team, released in 2011, cleared 8,000 copies in its first month, and Who Killed Captain Alex has sold 10,000 discs so far (ten times as many with piracy). But this yield has to cover losses when more discs are made than sold, as well as all filmmaking costs. Nabwana has longed to buy portable DVD players for each seller to show potential customers what they would be buying. But the cash just isn't there yet.

The studio also covers travel expenses for sellers going "upcountry," meaning west or east, but not north (northern Ugandans speak Swahili, and Nabwana's actors speak Luganda). Upcountry sellers usually travel for a week or so, offering their discs "man to man" (Nabwana's term), and send back RFP's cut using Mobile Money, a phone-based digital-wallet service. Harriet keeps track of their inventory and burns more discs when needed.

Because of piracy—a rampant problem in Uganda—new RFP films have a one-week sales window. After that, customers can buy a knockoff for cheaper than the original, and sales dry up. Some pirates just sell blank discs wrapped in RFP covers. Recently, copies of larger Western and Nigerian films have popped up, selling for 500 shillings (about 17 cents). This was a mystery—blank DVDs cost 800 shillings, and the economy of scale wouldn't offer any deep wholesale discounts for pirates, who must grub by on their own low capital and thin profit margins, like all other subsistence merchants in Uganda. Eventually, the studio came up with a theory: Local NGOs worked hand in hand with film pirates, paying for professional bootlegs that included short public-service announcements for AIDS awareness.

And some markets proved too stubborn to crack. In Tororo, a town in the far eastern part of the country, Swahili speakers bristled at the idea of paying 70 cents for a film in Luganda. In a different eastern village, outraged residents chased RFP sellers out of town. They hadn't had electricity in more than a month.

For the next couple of days, despite power being restored, stormy weather made filming impossible. So many of the cast and crew had to come from far away, and transportation became much harder in the rain. This wasn't much of a crisis, as Nabwana was primarily focused on tasks surrounding the Kickstarter rollout, and the scenes they'd planned to shoot were promotional, not part of ongoing projects. I sat in his studio as he peered intensely into his computer screen, working out the finer points of exploding a car's windshield using computer-generated imagery.

The shattering windshield was a tiny detail in a new RFP production logo, a miniature film in itself. In the logo sequence, a helicopter drops several Ugandan commandos into New York's Times Square, then fires a missile that magically destroys Katz's Delicatessen on East Houston, three miles away. Hofmanis had told me that this was one of the few high-resolution photos he'd been able to find of Manhattan that didn't involve actual terrorist hot spots (it was also, I suspect, a fitting farewell to his old life on Ludlow Street).

The helicopter portion of the sequence is pure comedy, but the destruction of the deli seems far more plausible. Many of Nabwana's midlevel special effects, especially explosions, are no worse than anything seen in any given Syfy Channel original movie. Shocked that a Ugandan filmmaker could produce such images, locals have called Nabwana's cell phone and accused him of being a witch doctor.

Nabwana switched back to the initial helicopter shot as a child walked in, whimpered for attention, and then waited for her dad's full attention to start crying. He is adept at working around such distractions. His studio room has no door, and the front of the house is left open throughout the day. Once, a chicken wandered in and laid an egg in his chair. He seemed to view such interruptions with amusement.

"Editing is sometimes monotonous," he said with a light chuckle.


Hawa, an RFP actress, and Bulya, a motorcycle taxi driver with a reputation for being "completely crazy"

Over the course of the next few days, Hofmanis seemed to age rapidly, furiously working through each night as he tweaked the multiple audio tracks on Captain Alex—the final cut of the film that had drawn him to Africa in the first place—struggling with every new problem. Should the VJ track drop in or fade in? Were the intro fonts correct? Hofmanis wasn't even sure whether he himself should receive on-screen credits for his labor, not wanting to complicate the film's status as something entirely Ugandan.

The self-imposed deadline for the studio's ambitious Kickstarter campaign was still two weeks away, but with intermittent power, meeting that deadline looked more and more improbable. On one of his breaks, we discussed the many challenges the studio would face if the Kickstarter campaign were successful. If Nabwana ever received proper backing, how would he respond to deadlines, or studio notes, or loss of total creative control? His films were tailored to urban Ugandan audiences, people who want to see their lives on a screen, any screen. How would these films translate to foreign audiences?

And no matter the outcome, the Kickstarter campaign would dramatically raise the stakes for the entire operation. The studio's funding total would be public. In the rumor mill of a Ugandan slum, another zero or two could be added to this amount. Nabwana and his family might become targets. In their current, shoestring incarnation, crime isn't a major concern. But if the studio met its wildest funding goals—buying a small parcel of land outside Wakaliga, building their own facilities—how would they handle security?

Then there are even more sobering eventualities. Nabwana is 42, and the average Ugandan lifespan is 58 years. He is in seemingly good health, and his own grandmother (to whom Captain Alex is dedicated) is going strong in her late 90s. But in a land where middle-aged men do not get prostate exams, cholesterol checks, or dental care, it isn't realistic to expect decades of output. Could anyone take over RFP after Nabwana slows or retires? Although Hofmanis sees a lasting curatorial role for himself, he is not going to direct any Ugandan films. Even if he learned Luganda, he would always be a mzungu, an outsider.

Hofmanis looked back to the work at hand. "This workload is horrific," he said, chuckling.

Sunday brought charged equipment and clear skies, and I was called upon to do a green-screen death scene for a promotional video. I protested in the way someone does when he's unsure whether he should do something he's secretly excited to do. The screen was a long, washable sheet of felt, pinned to the side of the Nabwana house and rolled down over two small carpets to cushion falls. Local kids seemed oblivious to the hubbub. Six-year-old Phillo, a boy from the neighborhood, did a cartwheel and left several muddy footprints on the pristine green cloth. Five minutes later, he finally noticed the smudges and loudly chewed out his playmates. Thunder rumbled, but the rain never arrived. I was going to die.

When the time came, I did my best to perish with flair. After several takes, I was asked to do some killing. It seemed like a bait-and-switch, but I was apparently the only one concerned about the optics of a white American mercilessly gunning down an unarmed black African. I was handed "Maria"—a gas-powered turret gun, modeled after the gun in Predator—and I annihilated my friend Apollo (and then awkwardly apologized for killing him).

They needed one more death, this time with a squib, a miniature explosive device used to simulate gunshots. Nabwana is a regular at the local Red Cross, where he gathers free condoms (and is thanked for his work promoting safe sex in the slums). These condoms are then filled with red food coloring, crazy-glued to a washer attached to fishing line, and taped to the chests of actors in death scenes.

Nabwana yelled "action!" I was shot, the line was pulled, and my shirt exploded in a splatter of bright, sticky liquid. Everyone laughed and applauded, and someone suggested that I might not want a blood-drenched shirt in my luggage on the trip home.

Excessive Candy Consumption Is Giving Children Burns and Seizures

$
0
0
Excessive Candy Consumption Is Giving Children Burns and Seizures

Moving Images of the 1980s UK Miners' Strike

$
0
0

[body_image width='1200' height='791' path='images/content-images/2015/03/03/' crop='images/content-images-crops/2015/03/03/' filename='keith-pattison-photographs-the-miners-strike-342-body-image-1425380713.jpg' id='32369']

Police march on pit gate down Office Street

This article first appeared on VICE UK.

Today marks 30 years since the end of the longest running strike in British history. On the March 3, 1985, the National Union of Mineworkers reluctantly voted to call off their year-long strike. Almost 200,000 miners had participated in an industrial dispute that was widely seen as a battle between Margaret Thatcher's economic policies and the organized working class. The year would see violence between striking miners and an uncompromising, militarized police force attempting to aid strike-breakers and maintain coal production at some level.

But of course, it wasn't all riots. Keith Pattison spent eight months in the East Durham pit village of Easington Colliery—featured in the film Billy Elliot—photographing the daily goings on as the strike progressed. Though an insignificant footnote on the face of it, Keith's 2010 book, No Redemption, a collaboration with writer David Pearce (Red Riding, The Damned United), would provide some of the most humanizing images of the dispute. I traveled to his current home just north of Berwick-upon-Tweed to discuss the strike and his images.

VICE: Let's start at the beginning: How did you end up taking these photographs in the East Durham coalfield?
Keith Pattison: At the time, I was scraping a living as a photographer, documenting arts projects mainly. This was obviously in the days when only photographers really had the skills, and people couldn't just knock stuff out on a digital camera to document what they wanted. One of the outfits I worked for were based in Sunderland. They placed artists in industry, be that shipbuilding, steel work or tank manufacturing and asked them to respond to it creatively. The lady who ran the scheme had contacts with people in Easington and saw an opportunity to send someone in to document the strike from another point of view, and so they asked me. I was really reluctant at first, because I didn't think I was good enough, but after an hour of being there, I just thought, This is brilliant, I don't want to be anywhere else.

[body_image width='1200' height='792' path='images/content-images/2015/03/03/' crop='images/content-images-crops/2015/03/03/' filename='keith-pattison-photographs-the-miners-strike-342-body-image-1425380806.jpg' id='32372']

Lodge Chairman Billy Stobbs stands at the pit gate with striking miners, resisting the efforts of the police to get the first strike breaker into the pit yard.

What did the miners think of having a photographer? Were they skeptical over who you were representing?
I think the union were quite amused when we'd asked them, "Do you think it would be useful to have a photographer in?" because they just couldn't see a mechanism where that could be useful. I mean 30 years ago, such were the means by which you distributed images nationally, those resources just weren't available to normal people, and so the miners found themselves at the mercy of the national media or the BBC. But entering an intensely tight community like that, you're never sure what kind of reaction there's going to be, and whether or not people would just see you as an interloper with a camera. But they were so reassuring and I was embraced into it really, they were just glad to have someone there to listen to them for once.

Was the way the strike had been represented elsewhere something you had to consider?
It was post-Orgreave [a particularly violent confrontation between strikers and police] when I arrived, and so I'd been confronted with all this sensationalism from the newspapers and TV around that, and I thought, "Christ, what am I walking in to?" Landing on a very wet Thursday, there were guys at the pit gate with a brazier—it was straight out of central casting you know, this is what a strike looks like. But within days of standing on the picket with them, I had become their photographer, and they looked after me. The police identified me as being with them because I didn't stand on the street corner with the other press photographers. I was doing something different, and so whatever notions of impartiality I might have wanted to entertain, I was kind of pushed into a position anyway, it really was, "Which side are you on?"

What was the state of affairs in Easington when you arrived? How far along was the strike?
I arrived in July, and arranged to lodge with a single miner who lived round the corner from the pit gate. It coincided with a big push from the government and the police to get people back to work. They were desperately trying to break the strike, and suddenly I was in the midst of it. It was this extraordinary happening just 50 yards away from our front door, every morning was this great piece of street theater, and that's not to belittle it, but a real sense of history in front of the lens. I'd never seen police with riot helmets on before and I was the only one there with a camera for the majority of the time. These things were happening and they were often unrecorded, which seems crazy now.

[body_image width='1200' height='787' path='images/content-images/2015/03/03/' crop='images/content-images-crops/2015/03/03/' filename='keith-pattison-photographs-the-miners-strike-342-body-image-1425381157.jpg' id='32376']

Josie Smith, a retired and disabled miner arrested outside his home. The police provoked more ill feeling as they insisted on walking strike-breakers through the village to and from the colliery. Frequent skirmishes ensued, in this one; Josie was arrested but later released to the relief of his distraught wife.

Yeah, it seems like the recording is such a massive part of any protest these days. It's not uncommon for photographers to outnumber protesters. But the media obviously did play a massive role in the strike. Was there a palpable sense of mis-representation amongst the miners?
There was an intense frustration on the ground as, from day one, there was an extraordinary level of support for the strike not just from Labour Party members and union members, but from the general public as a whole, all over the country. But the mainstream media were continually mis-representing how things were on the picket lines. Most days, the most exciting thing that happened in Easington was that people shouted at a bus, and then everyone would just get on with whatever they were doing. There wasn't anywhere near the levels of violence portrayed by the national media. People felt really marginalized. The way that the big hitters like the Mail or the Sun focussed on (NUM Leader) Arthur Scargill, and made him a hate figure, comparing him to Hitler and all sorts, they did exactly the same to Alex Salmond during the Yes campaign. It's easier to attack the man than the idea though.

[body_image width='788' height='1200' path='images/content-images/2015/03/03/' crop='images/content-images-crops/2015/03/03/' filename='keith-pattison-photographs-the-miners-strike-342-body-image-1425381275.jpg' id='32377']

Corner of Ascot Street and Office Street, Easington Colliery, 27 August 1984.

The real violence was that which was being acted out on people's communities on an ideological level.
They wanted to close down the industry that defined these people and places. For all the party lines about viability and un-economic pits, it was purely an ideological battle through which they wanted to crush trade unionism and that ability to organize. Even these East coast pits, with their massive under sea reserves, were deemed uneconomical; the irony being that the money spent on trying to sustain these communities in the wake of the pit closures has far surpassed the costs of keeping the industry going. And we're still importing coal on top of that; it was just absolute vandalism on a massive scale.

[body_image width='1200' height='797' path='images/content-images/2015/03/03/' crop='images/content-images-crops/2015/03/03/' filename='keith-pattison-photographs-the-miners-strike-342-body-image-1425381472.jpg' id='32380']

Joan Barnes making up food parcels for Christmas.

One thing I notice about how your photographs represent the strike, is that real sense of place. You don't just go for the sensational stuff, you see the beauty in how this village rallied together.
There were a slew of photographers working for various left-wing publications—Socialist Workers Party, Workers Revolutionary Party and so on—who tended to travel round the coalfields documenting the flash-points. There was a lot more violence in Yorkshire, and so a lot of the photography is concentrated there, but I suppose I was a bit of a coward, I didn't want to go for the rough stuff. So I just stayed in Easington and really got intimately involved with the ebb and flow of the strike. After the month I was due to spend there had passed, I felt like I couldn't walk away from it, and so I sold a few prints here and there to keep me going. Once the August was over, people were taking up really entrenched positions and sitting it out. The police had control of the pit and everyone else was either off picketing or just keeping morale up. It was a difficult one, people were generally feeling quite beaten, and so I tended to just photograph what I came into contact with.

[body_image width='1200' height='790' path='images/content-images/2015/03/03/' crop='images/content-images-crops/2015/03/03/' filename='keith-pattison-photographs-the-miners-strike-342-body-image-1425381678.jpg' id='32385']

Marilyn Johnson serving lunch in the Colliery Club function room. The canteen ran throughout the strike and during the school holidays and fed upwards of 600 people a day, using the single stove kitchen of the club.

The miners strike is considered a moment of politicization for a lot of working class women, was that something you noticed at the time?
The women were the backbone absolutely, and hugely politicized, which was really exciting for lots of them I think, because they could suddenly take center stage. They were more politicized than the men in some ways. They were so resourceful, feeding hundreds and hundreds of people per day on contributions and very limited cooking facilities.

[body_image width='1200' height='793' path='images/content-images/2015/03/03/' crop='images/content-images-crops/2015/03/03/' filename='keith-pattison-photographs-the-miners-strike-342-body-image-1425381764.jpg' id='32387']

March 1985. Easington Miners Welfare Hall, strikers vote to return to work without an agreement.

I think one of the most poignant images is that shot of the vote to return to work. How did the atmosphere differ then from when you first arrived?
Well obviously when I first arrived it was optimistic; people thought they had a chance. I don't think anyone could have imagined the village being sealed off by hundreds of police, nobody saw that coming. But by March 1985, everyone had had the stuffing knocked out of them. They were all in huge amounts of debt, their benefits had been cut. People were getting arrested for the most minor things, meaning a criminal record and every chance that you wouldn't get your job back anyway—punishing stuff. I don't think that the vote was a big surprise; I think there's a case for saying that the strike would have eventually just collapsed by itself, so it was a way of going back with some dignity. But this was after a year. You look at yourself and think, "could I have kept that up for a year?" Being battered daily in the media, having no money, living off contributions. A lot of people felt really embarrassed about that because they had been on good money. I think they just thought, "thank goodness."

[body_image width='1200' height='785' path='images/content-images/2015/03/03/' crop='images/content-images-crops/2015/03/03/' filename='keith-pattison-photographs-the-miners-strike-342-body-image-1425381925.jpg' id='32390']

Corner of Ascot Street and Office Street. Debbie Stobbs, Carol Draine, Molly Johnson, Mrs. Fletcher, Marion Stobbs, Norman Walker, Terry Lee look on as the police seal off the village to get Paul Wilkinson, the first strike breaker into the pit.

In the wider context, what do you think the miners' strike came to symbolize, and how do you think it will be remembered in the future?
For capitalism, it was the overthrowing of the power of working people. It came part and parcel with the de-regulation of the financial industries. Suddenly this was the magic bullet that was going to turn the country around. But of course it hasn't worked out like that. What we have now is inequality on a massive scale, banks that have taken the country to the absolute brink, and we have a continually humiliated working class who are constantly pulverized and demonized.

[body_image width='791' height='1200' path='images/content-images/2015/03/03/' crop='images/content-images-crops/2015/03/03/' filename='keith-pattison-photographs-the-miners-strike-342-body-image-1425382179.jpg' id='32396']

Back Cuba Street looking towards pit yard railway sidings. Joanne, Gillian, and Kate Handy with Brenda Robinson.

Do you think it was the end of collectivism and of really large-scale political engagement from the working class?
Yes, but also pride in manual labour and being working class people. It's going to be difficult to collectivize those who serve coffee and make pizza. But one of the clever things that Thatcher did in disempowering trade unions was to remove the infrastructure that enabled working people to become politicized and get into politics through their workplace. It's opened up a space for political wannabes and careerist jerks who have no sense of what might be happening in working class communities. People don't feel that it's possible to be involved in politics; they're not offered those avenues.

[body_image width='1200' height='800' path='images/content-images/2015/03/03/' crop='images/content-images-crops/2015/03/03/' filename='keith-pattison-photographs-the-miners-strike-342-body-image-1425382288.jpg' id='32397']

Brian, Paul and Denise Gregory at home in Cuba Street, just around the corner from the pit gate.

Did Easington have any lasting personal affect on you?
Well my first son was born on the day the strike ended, so I got a bit distracted. I worked on and off for the NUM in the Durham coalfield afterwards, but I drifted away and it became an event that had passed. It wasn't until I read David Peace's book GB84 that I suddenly realized that I needed to go back to the pictures. This was in 2010 with a potential Tory government on the horizon and the pictures seemed to re-focus and swing into context again. Even after 13 years of New Labour, I realized what we'd lost.

Scroll down for more photos.


How a Hockey Enforcer Became a Drug Dealing Cop

$
0
0
How a Hockey Enforcer Became a Drug Dealing Cop

James Clapper: Kill the Patriot Act, but Don't Blame Me if Another 9/11 Happens

$
0
0
James Clapper: Kill the Patriot Act, but Don't Blame Me if Another 9/11 Happens

California Soul: DIY Guns

$
0
0

At what point does a gun become a gun? The difference between a firearm and an inanimate hunk of aluminum is just a matter of a few of holes drilled into an unfinished metal receiver.

For Dimitri Karras, who manufactures the raw materials that become AR15s, that difference is everything. Because it is legal for a hobbyist to make a gun in the comfort of their own home without going through a background check or registering it, negotiating the boundary between what is a gun and what isn't has become Karrass's passion. In this episode of California Soul, we delve into the world of do-it-yourself weapons to see what the future holds for gun control in America.

LIVE: Watch Benjamin Netanyahu’s Address to Congress

$
0
0

On Tuesday morning, Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu will address a joint session of the US Congress, delivering a controversial speech in which he is expected to warn lawmakers against what he thinks is a bad deal with Iran regarding that country's nuclear capabilities.

The speech has roiled US-Israeli relations in recent weeks, with the partisan debate threatening to overshadow Netanyahu's message. The problem is that Bibi wasn't invited by President Obama, but rather by Republican House Speaker John Boehner. In fact, the White House wasn't even aware that he was going to be invited until after the fact. This is an unusual, perhaps unprecedented, move by a sitting foreign head of state, and it looks like a big fuck-you to the White House as it enters the final stage of negotiations with Iran.

The Obama administration has, perhaps understandably, not been happy about all this. The President has declined to meet with Netanyahu while he is in Washington, citing the proximity of the visit to Israeli elections, set to take place later this month. Vice President Joe Biden and Secretary of State John Kerry are both conveniently out of town today—in fact, Kerry is in Switzerland resuming negotiations with Iran's foreign minister. Last week, Susan Rice, Obama's national security adviser, told PBS's Charlie Rose that Bibi's speech was "destructive of the fabric of the relationship."

Both Obama and Netanyahu tried to downplay the disagreements yesterday, with the latter telling a gathering of the American Israel Public Affairs Committee in Washington Monday that the speech was "not intended to show any disrespect to President Obama or the esteemed office he holds." Obama, meanwhile, told Reuters in an exclusive interview that while the administration has substantial disagreements with Israel over how to deal with Iran, it is not "permanently destructive" to the relationship.

Still, it's pretty clear there has been damage done. A sizable chunk of Democrats in Congress have decided to skip Bibi's speech this morning, and a number of others have said they will attend but won't be happy about it. And it's hard to see this as anything other than Netanyahu and Republicans conspiring to use each other for their own political advantage—Bibi seeking to gain an upper hand in his tight election contest this month, and Republicans looking to gain leverage in their fight against the Obama administration's deal with Iran.

Needless to say, it's going to be interesting. Watch the live video of the speech below:


[youtube src='//www.youtube.com/embed/HhqT1oT5xn0' width='853' height='480']

Everything Is Awesome with Camming, According to Cam Girlz Documentary

$
0
0

[vimeo src='//player.vimeo.com/video/87495067' width='1200' height='675']

On the "Reverse Peephole" episode of Seinfeld, Kramer and Newman ask for Jerry's pliers so they can reverse the peepholes on their apartment doors. "But then anyone can just look in and see you," cries Jerry. "Our policy is we're comfortable with our bodies," Kramer replies. "If somebody wants to help themselves to an eyeful, we say enjoy the show."

This sentiment is now echoed by the entire industry of "camming," a hybrid of chat room, peep show, and strip club that offers viewers a glimpse via webcam into the personal and often very naked spaces of women from across the web. Director Sean Dunne ( American Juggalo, Florida Man) has accomplished what many men who use these services could never imagine: he sat face to face with the women who use their bedroom as an office.

Within a profession that most people only see in pop-up ads, Dunne illuminates the many different personalities and motivations of these women, layering emotionally personal interviews over intimately captured footage of their daily shows. Based on the subjects he talked to, Dunne comes away understanding the profession as a place where cammers find gratification from their work, finding confidence amid the orgasms.

We caught up with Dunne to talk about the future of cyberporn, what's with all that spanking, and to bring you an exclusive teaser for the film.

VICE: What was your knowledge of camming before this?
Sean Dunne: I actually didn't have a lot of ideas about cam girls before. I thought of it as something maybe wilder than what's going on, and if I had any preconceived notions in my head, I think it probably had to do with some antiquated values. Like, "oh no, they shouldn't be doing this, somebody's got to save these girls. What's gone wrong?" The further I dug around, the further from the truth that sentiment could've been, 'cause they don't need help, they are empowered through this work and are gaining independence. My mind has changed about what these girls are up to.

What sparked the idea then? Did you think you were entering a seedier world?
Actually the exact opposite. We had just made a film called Oxyana which was very seedy. It was about a town that is hooked on Oxycontin and it was pretty dark. The idea with this one was to kind of come out of it and explore some people on the fringes that weren't so dangerous but were still threatening to societal values. So when I first went to take it on, it was as a reprieve from the darkness of my last subject. Just thinking maybe we could tell some stories about women and more specifically, women who are challenging the establishment.

What was your relationship with porn growing up? Did this world feel very foreign to you?
It did a little bit because I'm 33 and I remember the time before the internet when you had to figure out how to get a Playboy, Penthouse, or a Sports Illustrated swimsuit edition even. Then all of a sudden it became very easy to locate and find porn for free. And what it's evolved to since then is this highly interactive, highly-emotional thing that really surprised and would really surprise people who don't have a lot of experience with this stuff.

An exclusive clip of Cam Girlz

Well, it's so different; you could never have a connection with a magazine or porno video, and now you now see people having one with a live feed of it.
Yeah, that interactivity is really what the game changer was with camming. Adding it to the mix, you're turning the corner now into something that is really hard to define and almost transcends porn.

With the film, were you aware of how much sexual content you were showing? What prevented it from becoming artful pornography?
I think what prevented it from becoming that is we had this balance the whole time with these audio-only interviews, which serve as the audio for the entire film—those were done off-camera in intimate settings. We allowed their real voices to come out. Then the idea was to juxtapose [the interviews] with these visuals of them doing this amazing, creative, and entertaining work, and leaving it to the audience to decide how they feel about this—if they want to update their values or judgements towards these types of people.

How did you discover the women you featured?
We found a lot of them through Twitter. We got a really good connection with the community. A woman named Sophia Locke runs an event in Vegas called Cam Mansion where she just has a whole bunch of cam girls get together a couple times a year and cam in this big rental house. She got us in with the community and said, "Come out to Cam Mansion I'll have a whole bunch of girls here, you can interview them and kind of get a sense of things." So we took that opportunity to shoot a week's worth of footage, which we used to make a trailer and raise the money on Kickstarter. Once we had the Kickstarter out there, girls were lining up. Basically, we cast it through our Twitter.

It seems like a broad extension of social media and the culture of "likes" in that a lot of the girls featured enjoy the instant validation it provides.
I definitely think there were elements of that all throughout the film, and that's the kind of stuff I really hope the audience picks up on. These little gems that are hidden in there that are commentary on where we're going with all this technology—with this ability to connect, with this need for attention. Men seeking attention from the women, women seeking attention from them; there's a very strange and modern dynamic that goes on there. It's very mature. It's much more mature than you'd think. It doesn't dissolve into the types of conversations that you would assume hanging around in any of these rooms and seeing what goes on. The dynamic between the members and the cam girls is very fascinating. I saw the movie Her come out right when we were at the beginning of shooting this and I thought, "Man, there's so many similar qualities that are in our film that I feel like it's a prequel to Her." We're watching a whole bunch of people staring at their devices, but they're getting something truly fulfilling out of it. I'm curious to see where it's all going, maybe we're turning a corner with how we interact.

Did you see camming confusing people's perception of reality and fantasy?
I think it does, and I'm basing that solely on the interviews. I spoke to a handful of the guys that were on the other end of this, and I know more beyond the people we spoke to in the film. And I spoke to a lot of the women in the film and their one concern would be that rare circumstance where somebody gets the wrong idea and thinks that they're actually going to have a real-life relationship with them. What these girls are doing isn't necessarily what a stripper does, they're doing what a girlfriend does. They remember your dog's name, they are friendly with you, they're excited to see you. I could see how it could get very confusing for the members. It's not like they're inept or couldn't get girls otherwise; a lot of them work weird hours or are in long-distance relationships. There's so many reasons that people are on there doing this. But a lot of the time you could see how these guys could get ahead of themselves.

One girl in the film does mention being pursued beyond the camera. Did you encounter many stories like this or feel it was safer culture?
It's the safest form of sex work you could possibly do, and when I hear anyone speaking out against it I'm so confused—like, who's getting hurt here? It's people sitting in a room by themselves looking at a 2-D image. But there are a lot of emotions flying around. I think every girl we spoke to has a story like that, of an overzealous fan or an overzealous member who took it too far or misinterpreted it. I don't think it's something that controls these girls' world though. Part of what makes it so safe is the fact that they can control it, they can do regional blocking, they can block the whole town or the whole state that they're in. You can block members on the fly. A lot of girls are very empowered by this work, and I think it's because those tools are at their disposal and they don't have to put it up with it.

Did you look into male camming at all?
No, the only thing I've ever heard about it is it's less of a cottage industry and it's a little bit more niche. The guys can't make nearly as much money as women can on there. I'm not really sure why, if there's not much of a demand for it. Maybe in the gay community there is, but I don't know any straight women who want to go online and watch a guy jack off in their room. I think if I were making a film called Cam Boyz, the tone would be more different and decidedly more seedy.

What is with all the spanking?
(Laughs) It's something I realized too, no matter what background and how different every girls show was, every girl seems to incorporate spanks. I think it just says something about us as a culture, that it's a lot more ubiquitous than anyone expected. At least for me. I'm not big into it, but every cam girl was doing spanks, and had evidence that they'd been going hard! They just treated it like getting a cup of coffee while you're at work. The other things the guys really like is when girls are doing shows in public, and that goes along the same lines where you can't fake it, you're in a vulnerable position. That's real. That's what drew me to this whole community in the first place: the idea that this is really what we've been sold our whole lives, this idea of the girl next door, not Playboy. They're not porn stars: they're filmmakers as far as I'm concerned.

How do you see camming evolving?
A lot of the girls started to tell me that they think holograms are going to be a part of it, so you won't just be staring at your laptop, you'll actually be looking at this girl in your physical space. There are also devices you can hook up to your computer being tested where you can fuck your computer and feel like you're fucking one of these cam girls. With sexuality, if it can be done, it will be done. I think of it as the beginning of something—it's the democratization of pornography. It's a beautiful thing.

There's no concern about widening the gap between physical connectivity?
No, I'm an optimist when it comes to the future, I like embracing anything that's new and might be scary to people. I think it's inevitable, we're merging with the machines and I'm fine with it, we've been doing it for a long time and we're only going to be doing it more. I'll be exploring it more in movies for the rest of my career.

You're ready for Skynet to takeover then?
I embrace our new Skynet overlords.

Watch Cam Girlz online.

Viewing all 38002 articles
Browse latest View live




Latest Images