Quantcast
Channel: VICE CA
Viewing all 38002 articles
Browse latest View live

Success Sucks

$
0
0


Our guy Chris fronting the 2010 Comedy Central sitcom, Big Lake.

Young dudes have a fantasy that someday they might get famous, and if they do they’ll have all sorts of money and get tons of pussy. As someone who once flirted with fame, I want to let all of you young men know that it’s completely true.           

In 2010, I was the star of a sitcom. It came and went pretty fast. But in the months from when I was cast in the sitcom through when it was done airing, my life did change remarkably.

I had more money than I’d ever had before. It was pretty awesome to not have to stress about eating at restaurants and taking cabs. Also, a weird thing about finally having money is that once you have it, people want to give you shit for free now that you can actually afford it. Food, clothes, shoes, people just want you liking their shit since maybe you’ll like it on a talk show and other people will get to know about it. It gets weird. Once while in the dressing room of my show, I heard a knock on my door and a man entered and silently handed me a box with a brand new HD flip cam inside. He turned and walked away. I have no idea who he was or who sent me the camera.           

Everything with women changed as well. I quickly found out that when you are on television, you somehow become more physically attractive. For some reason, when I wasn’t on TV, things like having a giant head and a joint deformity that gives me shitty little claw hands were often deal breakers with women of a certain caliber. But once I was on TV, those problems faded into the background and very attractive women were not only willing to date me, they were the ones asking me out. The only work I had to put in was “have a Facebook account.” When my TV show was in production, dozens of women asked me out on Facebook. Some were shy about it; some were blatant. Some I knew, some were total strangers. But they went for it. And many of these women were admittedly way out of my fucking league.

It was fun to hang out with really pretty ladies, and it was fun to indulge in the rock star fantasy. Even though I had less time then I’d ever had, I spent more time on dates with hot girls than I ever imagined I’d get to when I was a shy, depressed kid growing up from the age of birth until the moment I got a TV show. One memorable lady from this stretch of life was super beautiful and so sexually aggressive that one time we had sex and I immediately had to go to a store to buy cleaning products that would get my own blood out of a carpet. As a child, if you told me that someday a beautiful girl in her early 20s with the elusive dark hair/blue eyes combo, a great body and a sadistic side would have blood sex with me, I never would have believed you.

I got to do things I’d never done before and haven’t done since: I attended a party on a roof that Eva Mendes was at. I got flown first class all over the country to do shit like go to Comic Con. I was in magazines and on radio shows and living the whole life.           

So I found out that the stuff I assumed about the rock star lifestyle—the money and women and free stuff and access to shit you don’t usually have—they’re all real. That fantasy does exist. It can be a reality. I’ve seen it, and I’ve lived it.

But I don’t have a drive to see it again. I got my taste of it, and then it dried up. I didn’t run off to Los Angeles to try to get on another show and get more of it. I didn’t feel panic that I was being sent back to my regular life of being poor and not having hot girls ask me out via impersonal cybernetic communication. It didn’t feel like the end of Flowers for Algernon, like I was slipping back into a less desirable life and felt cold terror at the prospect. I didn’t clamor to recreate that stretch. Why?

The trappings of that fantasy are attainable. It was easy to get the money and girls and access and stuff. But the pre-supposition we all have about that fantasy when we’re young is that those things will come to us, and living that way will make us happy.          

And it didn’t do that at all.           

No aspect of my brief and mild fame actually made me happier. I had no idea what to do with all the money I made. Upon getting my first paycheck, I bought a new pair of pants, two shirts, and for the first time in my life splurged on prescription sunglasses. That’s not exactly making it rain. I wish I was the type of person who popped bottles at clubs and took private jets and shit. The bottom line is I’m not. Having money didn’t make me less of a socially incapable loser; it just made me a socially incapable loser who wasn’t in debt.           

And the women… it was fun, don’t get me wrong. Having sex is a healthy and fun thing. Feeling desired is a great feeling. Dating people whom, months prior, you would have viewed as out of your league is exciting. But it got old fast.           

Luckily for me, this isn’t even something I’ve had to tell myself to rationalize the failure of my sitcom and the huge career hit that was. I realized that along the way. A few weeks into my flirtations with fame, I was very well aware that fame wasn’t going to transform my life. The lingering feelings that this didn’t feel right began immediately; and God handed me a specific incident that smacked me back to reality and allowed me to see my newfound fame for what it really was – gilded, hollow, and about my circumstances – but never really about me.           

Here’s the type of thing that life will hand you just so you are totally clear that you are who you are and no amount of money or sex or photo shoots will change you at your core:           

One afternoon, I was scheduled to go on a press blitz. A limo was being sent to my house in Queens. I was told to wear a whole bunch of fancy clothes. It was some glitzy ass shit, and I was going to be pampered all day. A team of publicists would be shuttling me from location to location. I was going to have my picture taken. I was going to give cute quotes to magazines. I was going to sit with an earpiece in and do a series of quick interviews for various television programs that pretend they are news shows when they deal solely with entertainment. It was going to be a fancy fucking day. I was going to be pampered. It was to be the type of day only famous people get to have.           

I got a text from my limo driver saying he was outside my apartment. I checked myself in the mirror. Form fitting suit jacket I would have made fun of someone else for wearing three months ago? Check. Haircut that looked like any other haircut I’d ever had but cost 90 more dollars? Check. I was ready to roll around in that limo to live as the rock star I had always known in my heart I could be.

I headed to my front door, took a deep breath and turned the knob so I could exit the apartment I shared with my roommate in Queens (and believe me, my rock star plans included finding my own place in a cooler neighborhood immediately). Only, the knob didn’t turn. In fact, it broke off in my hand.

I tried to re-attach it; no dice. I tried to turn the screw that was hanging out of my door; also a no-go. I pushed the door, tried to get a grip and pull it, but there was no getting around the reality that I was trapped within my own house.

I received another text from my limo driver, now asking where I was. I knew that we were on a tight schedule, and this guy was probably being asked why I wasn’t in his car already. I wrote back that I was trying to get downstairs. He wrote back “Trying?”

So while wearing my fancy clothes, and about to get into my fancy car, while living a life of wealth and women, I was faced with the grim prospect that I had to escape my own shitty apartment in Woodside. I’m not sure if I believe in God or not, but it certainly feels like a moment in my life where a higher power went out of its way to say “DON’T FORGET WHO YOU ARE. YOU ARE A GUY WHO LIVES IN QUEENS. LET THAT DOOR KNOB IN YOUR HAND REMIND YOU OF THE TRUTH ABOUT THE LIFE YOU LEAD.”

After one last desperate attempt to get the knob back on the door, I ran to my room and opened the window. I crawled onto my fire escape, hoping the dirt and rust on it wasn’t going to stain my fancy-boy clothes. I pulled the cord to drop the ladder down and climbed.         

There was a four-foot drop at the bottom of my climb. Luckily, I knew that I wasn’t going to hurt myself, because directly beneath my fire escape was the area that my entire building threw their garbage into. A pile of garbage about three bags thick was waiting to gently catch me once I let go.           

I had no other option, so I dropped legs first into the garbage of nine apartments. I waded out of it into the alley alongside my building. I stopped and brushed off the flecks of food matter that had stuck to my shoes and the lower half of my pants.           

I climbed into the back seat of the limo and the driver immediately looked into his rear view mirror and made a face—while I could flick away the garbage itself, I could only wait for the smell to dissipate on its own.           

I spent a day doing interviews talking about being on a television show with a series of interviewers who were playing their part in the weird fantasy life that is the entertainment industry. The whole day, as I spoke about the work and the life and the surprise of being at the center of a TV show, I never stopped hearing my own thoughts rattling around the back of my own brain: A few hours ago you were thigh deep in garbage. Don’t forget who you are.

These days I host a public access television show and do stand up and write essays and really enjoy my life. My previous success exposed how misguided my priorities and expectations had been. It exposed a part of myself I wound up really not liking. These days, I have no idea if success awaits me in the future. I work hard and believe in the work I do, but I don’t bank on it. But I don’t fear that success will bring out the same unlikable sides of me, because I know that it won’t change me. Not because I don’t want it to, or because I’m punk rock and want to avoid it. I just know from previous experience that success won’t change me because it can’t change me. It can change the size of the house I live in. It can change the type of car I drive. It can increase the amount of Facebook solicitations I receive and the amount of free technology handed to me by mysterious strangers. But it can’t change the fact that I dwell in the garbage pile. From my earliest days in New Jersey to now, I’m most comfortable with a broken door knob in my hand while standing knee deep in a big pile of other peoples’ trash. That’s who I am and who I’ve always been. Like it or not, it’s who I’ll always be, so I might as well like it.

@ChrisGethard
 

Previously - Why I Love My Meds


The 40-Year-Old Pot Virgin

$
0
0



Jamen Shively only started smoking herb a-year-and a-half ago, but he's been making up for lost time ever since. Now an aspiring marijuana mogul, as well as a dedicated cannabis connoisseur, the 45-year-old former Microsoft executive even credits the very conception of his latest high-profile start-up venture to the enlightening influence of some top grade ganja. Specifically, a powerful sativa strain he broke out at an exploratory business meeting last November, just days after Washington state voters overwhelmingly approved pot legalization.

“I pulled out my stash, the dankest of the dank,” he recalls of that fateful occasion. “We fired up, and the concepts we generated were just incredible. Off the charts. Until the idea started to flow into creating a global juggernaut in what's going to be a trillion dollar market. We brainstormed so many different aspects of it, including the supply chain, financing, geopolitics, lobbying, genetics, even greenhouses. And it quickly became clear that we were sitting on an absolute gold mine.”

An evangelical admirer of the business book The 22 Immutable Laws of Marketing, Shively firmly believes it's better to be first to mind, than first to market. So before legalization even had a chance to take root, he began telling the press he was creating America's seminal national marijuana brand, and that his fledgling new enterprise would soon employ 10,000 people, while “minting more millionaires than Microsoft.”

“It actually becomes a virtuous cycle,” he explains to me over the phone, “the more outrageous claims I make—true claims—the more mindshare I get, and the bigger platform I have to discuss my plans. After all, what weed company is everybody talking about these days? The one run by an ex-Microsoft crackpot whose making all these outrageous claims.”

So let's take a closer look at just three claims Shively's made while promoting the Diego Pellicer brand, which he named after his great-grandfather, a 19th century hemp farmer.          

“Diego Pellicer cannabis will retail for $50 per gram.”

This is like Shively saying he wants to create the Starbucks of marijuana (which he actually has said), only his national coffee chain charges about three times as much as the country's most expensive boutique roasters. When I ask if this tremendous mark-up will be attributable to some kind of high-end shopping experience, he says no way.

“Look, dude. This isn't taking a Big Mac and wrapping it in gold foil. We're talking about value based on the inherent quality of the cannabis itself. Because when I get high, I don't want it to be a so-so high. I want an experience that's going to last several hours... We live in a country where even middle class people won't settle for anything less than the best that they can get. And what's considered top quality in the available marijuana market is nothing compared to what we're creating.”

To which, all I can say is: I really look forward to sampling some cannabis that's three times better than the best I've ever had. (And Jamen, I'll in be in Seattle mid-September.)

Marijuana will be legal, on a federal level, in all 50 states, in two years, tops.”

I first heard Shively make this prediction during an appearance on Huffington Post Live. He even promised the show's incredulous host that if proven wrong, “I will fly you [to Seattle] first class and put you up in my home. And we will get stoned. And you will enjoy it.”

Honestly, I'm struggling for a metaphor to properly explain how unlikely it is that his prediction will come true. How about this: If President Obama held a press conference first thing tomorrow morning, and wore a weed leaf button on his lapel instead of the American flag, while introducing Willie Nelson as the new head of the DEA, I'd still have 50-state pot legalization by June 2015 as an 18-1 underdog.


(Photo by David Mesford)

We're not going to appeal to pot smokers. Our price is too high. Which makes our target market the law abiding citizens who will be first time users.”

This particular statement only ventures into the realm of the truly absurd when coupled with the companion claim that Diego Pellicer will be the largest distributor of cannabis nationwide, by securing a 40 percent market share of both recreational and medicinal marijuana sales in every state where it's legal. All by catering to high-end customers who've never smoked pot before in their lives, but have shitloads of cash to spend on it.

Now, I'm no expert on how demographic market research is supposed to work, but it sounds to me like Jamen Shively identified his ideal customer by simply looking in the mirror. Also, I sort of doubt Starbucks built their empire by focusing on first-time coffee drinkers.

The Mexican Connection

Most recently, in search of mind share, Shively held a joint press conference with former Mexican president Vicente Fox, who eloquently expressed his hope that marijuana legalization in the United States will help diminish the prohibition-fueled violence of the international drug cartels. Though Fox has no direct stake in Diego Pellicer or any other aspect of the cannabis industry, his high profile appearance before the press only fueled speculation that the brand might eventually look to import its product from south of the border.

“The whole topic of trade with Mexico got so far overblown it's kind of funny,” Shively says now that the smoke's cleared. “My whole point from the beginning was simply that we've got this big, hemispheric problem that may require a big, hemispheric solution. So we need to keep an open mind about things we might otherwise have a knee jerk reaction against.”

An interesting and even worthwhile thought experiment, no doubt. But perhaps one best kept to a smoky back room until the Feds finally call off their War on Weed.

“He's waiving a red flag at a bull,” UCLA Professor of Public Policy Mark A. R. Kleiman responds when I ask if Shively's plans might be seen as provocative by the US Department of Justice. Colloquially known as Washington's “pot czar,” Kleiman advises the state's Liquor Control Board on how to best implement the will of the people when it comes to recreational marijuana cultivation and sales, including by creating a system that adequately addresses the federal government's frequently voiced interest in preventing the rise of large-scale, multi-state marijuana enterprises.

“So going on TV to announce the creation of your large-scale, multi-state marijuana enterprise is certainly not helpful to the cause,” he says. “Nor is it consistent with any sane business strategy. The people entering this industry will be in a very equivocal position, and I suggest they keep their heads down. Not hold a press conference with Vicente Fox.”

After stressing that he's speaking with me not as an official of the state of Washington, but strictly in his role as an academic, a blogger, and an “all around nice guy who's single and looking,” the so-called pot czar wraps our call up by saying some less than nice things about the Diego Pellicer business model .

“The only thing I can imagine is that the goal is not to sell cannabis, but to sell stock,” Kleiman speculates. “I don't have any evidence, but that would make perfect sense. But even if this is a stock promotion, somebody's either crazy or stupid. Because this guy sounds like he'd sell you the Brooklyn Bridge, while taking the Verrazano as a trade-in.”

No Risk, High Reward

Perhaps the central selling point Shively's been using to attract potential investors is that his brand offers a “risk mitigated” way to get in on the ground floor of the sure to be lucrative marijuana production and distribution market without running afoul of the authorities.

“We've taken jail out of the equation,” he says. When I ask how that's possible, given federal law, Shively describes spending a ton of money in legal fees to come up with a proprietary “deal structure” that allows him to acquire medical marijuana dispensaries and recreational pot stores across the country without creating any criminal liability.

“When it's sufficiently legal to own them outright, we will. Until then, there's a whole different way we're going to operate.”

Diego Pellicer's first such acquisition was a Seattle medical marijuana access point called the North West Patient's Resource Center that maintains a stellar reputation within the industry and among lawmakers in Washington State. CEO John Davis has been a dedicated drug law reform advocate for decades. In 2008, he shared NORML's Cannabis Activist of the Year award for his role in helping to organize Seattle Hempfest, and he currently serves as Executive Director of the Coalition for Cannabis Standards and Ethics.

When I ask about his relationship with Jamen Shively, he says they're “married,” in the business sense, just three months after meeting for the first time.

“We each had what the other needed,” Davis explains. “I know the law, policy, procedures, the political landscape, and how to properly bring to market this particular product. While Jamen can access the financing I need to build infrastructure.”

Meanwhile, Shively says he's already looking to acquire additional retail outlets in Colorado and California, as soon as he completes an ongoing $10 million round of fundraising. The head of Diego Pellicer expects absolutely no problem reaching that initial eight-figure goal, though the current state of his coffers remains confidential, right alongside the risk mitigating details of his proprietary deal structure.

Ultimately, he's looking to raise $100 million to fully fund the company. Or perhaps to buy 200,000 grams of whatever he's been smoking.


David Bienenstock is the author of Legalized It!


More about weed:

Get Rich or High Trying

High Country - Part 1

North Korea Is Stoned All the Time, Which Explains a Lot



 

The Mercy Rule: The Least Important Important Thing

$
0
0


Photo via Flickr user Dustin

This is David Roth’s last column for VICE. He’s leaving after accepting an offer to work for SB Nation. We’re bummed he’s leaving, but also excited to see what he does at his new home. Since he’s on his way out, we asked him why he thought writing about sports was worthwhile in the first place, and this is what he said.

There are problems in this world—massive, brutal institutionalized avarice; a widening and increasingly ill-tempered distance from each other and the uglinesses that follow from that; the very concept of Food Network's yowling linen-encased butter-beast Paula Deen. One problem that we do not have, though, is an insufficient amount of talking about sports. For all our individual and collective failings here on Earth, we’ve had unparalleled success in creating opportunities for ourselves and others to project and identify and parse and seethe and yell and read and cheer and boo about sports-y things. There are more than enough media venues on which one can watch strident over-enunciators pretend to be outraged about NBA players and their tattoos; there are more than enough Quease and the Gristle Man sports talk radio duos teasing the fetid, sudsy ids of their audiences. The oceans rise and the deserts creep in on us and various vital pillars wobble and fissure, but we will not starve for lack of supremely confident buttheads who’ll have ready-made, surprisingly heated answers at hand when asked whether LeBron James is a True Winner.

All this does not exactly suggest that we're capable of the sort of reasonable conversations we'd need to have in order to address the dual problems of global climate change and Paula Deen's line of signature butters. But while the conversations themselves aren't always worth savoring, caring and talking about sports are basically good things. The problem is that though sports are basically great, what's great about them are the aspects least easily argued about. If all you knew about sports was what you read or heard or saw on television, you'd have a vague sense that sports are What Brings Us Together and inherently virtuous, but also infuriating and under assault from various familiar threats—entitled youth, millionaire thugs, any number of other grumpy-uncle mutterings you can fill in yourself. There would be a sense, from watching the various pleather-y squeakers that play-fight about sports for a living on TV, that all this is Very Important. There'd be no sense of what's fun about sports, let alone worthy of exalting, or why anyone would ever want to watch.

Which is strange, actually, because convincing people to watch is not just the reason why sports media exists, but the only thing it’s there to do. I would not and should not be writing about sports if I didn't think they were a way to better understand and enjoy a complicated moment-to-moment existence—not to mention a pretty righteous excuse to tell that existence to fuck off for a couple hours, because you are watching the NBA Finals and drinking a beer. For sportswriting to mean anything, it has to be grounded in that most important thing, which is that both the writer and the reader agree that this is something worth caring about.

And when it doesn't work—when some ulcerous heel over-enunciates through some ghoulish race-trolling or some clammy disciplinarian issues a high-altitude scolding or a fatuous Human Sports Entertainment Brand vapidly reaches into the bag o’ catchphrases—it's fundamentally because the sportswriter in question has broken faith with that central agreement to not just care about this stuff, but love it at least a little, and at least enough to know that it's more complex and more interesting than any individual take on it.

You can feel the importance of that mutual appreciation and affection most acutely and unmistakably in their absence. This is where all that poker-faced kidulty partisanship and dim pomp and the other various varieties of bloat come from—a forgetting that the thing itself is engrosing enough without all the high-definition lily-gilding or raised voices, and a lack of trust that the people on the other side of the equation are smart enough to know that. Sports can work in the same way that art or music or film can—evoke the same big feelings, hint at the same big things—but they function as a business, with all the cynicism and condescension that come with that.

This is part of what makes the worst aspects of the sports discourse simultaneously so painful and so deadening: the sense that we are being sold something by someone who thinks we’re foolish, and that we need to be tricked or bullied or dazzled into buying it. The curmudgeons and partisans and bias-milkers try to bring us together around sports as our smallest and angriest selves; the leagues can only understand the real and lovely communal aspect of sports fandom as an American flag the size of a football field, with a sponsor's logo placed tastefully in the corner. The sports-centric media generally dedicates itself to telling us how important all this is, how big and buyable it is. But of course we already know that what's really great about sports is smaller, freer, truer, and more open. It's why we're there, together, in the first place, watching. We wouldn't come back if we weren't already in love.

@david_j_roth

Previously: The Joyless Joys of Bad Baseball

GMOs Aren't That Bad, But Monsanto Is the Worst

$
0
0


The March Against Monsanto march in Vancouver. via.

If you’ve been keeping up on your current food injustices, you’ve likely heard about the recent Marches Against Monsanto—the worldwide rallies against the production and selling of Monsanto’s Genetically Engineered foods.

The ever-growing concerns with food technology and the questionable direction it has taken is spreading across the world—especially in younger, more progressive circles, and as rallies like these popularize themselves so does the back and forth conversations about the legitimacy of these agricultural concerns.

One of the biggest questions in the air right now is in regards to the legitimacy of the negative claims and soiled reputation of GMO products. Are they safe? Who are they harming? Could they potentially help the world in some way?

Until protesters and corporate opposition can confidently answer those questions with reliable means of information, it will be hard for most to distinguish between right and wrong on the specific topic of GMO technology and products.

However, what has become blatantly obvious to most concerned citizens is the questionable character of the big companies that currently have GMO technologies at their disposal.

Let’s take a look at where the true argument should begin, focus on the aspects we know right now, and delve into the creepy rabbit hole that is the Monsanto Corporation.
 

Confusing Technology with Evil.

By far the biggest error that these well meaning protestorsmake when organizing, attending, and voicing their concerns is making GMO food production an issue of science instead of an issue of corporate morality. Most fail to see the big picture—and that is the possibility that the actual technology behind GMO production could potentially be used for great things in our agricultural age, but just isn’t. 

Just like guns can be used to protect or destroy, and fences can be used to preserve or detain, GMO technology can be used to serve the people or the man. Currently the man is winning that battle—but please don’t make technology guilty by association.
 

Monsanto: The Real Issue

Monsanto is your typical long-standing super corporation: Incredibly intelligent, incredibly rich, and incredibly fucked. One of their most notorious product creations was a chemical by the name of ‘Agent Orange’, which was used for chemical warfare in Vietnam—killing and disfiguring what is estimated to be millions of Vietnamese people.


Some Vietnamese people would argue that Agent Orange was a bad thing. via.

Since that time they began to use that same knack for helpful technology for food production and agricultural domination. Monsanto is most notorious for their “round up ready” products (seeds that grow their own pesticides for instance) as well as creating seeds that can’t reproduce after their first growth—forcing farmers who buy the seeds to continue buying year after year. Monsanto routinely sues farmers who have the opportunity to ‘save seeds’ for use in future crops for breach of contract. That’s right; Monsanto has a clause built right into their sales contracts that gives them the right to sue any farmer who reproduces food from the previous years’ crops. Sustainability obviously isn’t a big priority in Monsanto’s business plan—but their financial strategies are quite clever. 

You may be asking yourself why farmers would continue buying these seeds knowing that they can only use them once and risk being sued for doubling up on crop production—and the answer is strictly based on finances. Monsanto (being as intelligent as they are) have completely dominated the seed market to the point where they control the price. If you want non-Monsanto/GMO seeds, you are going to pay out the ass for them.  Monsanto also has a hand in all the major subsidized foods in Canada and the US (Corn, Soy etc.) which means if a farmer wants a break on the cost of his food production he is likely going to receive those savings on a Monsanto brand product. Again, Monsanto knows what’s up and they’ve put themselves in a very dominant position in North American agriculture.


How can a company get away with such a monopoly?

As we’ve already established, Monsanto is a company that moves in well-strategized directions. They aren’t likely to push a product or make any corporate moves that aren’t already pre-determined successes. A big part of their ability to ensure submissive attitudes from government organizations that could potentially shut them down is to hire influential government employees and pay them, or get their current employees influential government jobs. This is called the “revolving door” and can be found between many corporate interest groups and government branches.

If all else fails they’ve recently passed legislation known as the Monsanto Protection Act. This was a bill passed through the US government (cleverly stuck between a bunch of funding projects that required approval in order to release funds to government members) that removes all liability of negative environmental and human repercussions that could come from the production and use of Monsanto products. 

This sort of bill is essential for a company like Monsanto that performs all of their own safety testing, and has never conducted extensive long term studies related to the possible long term side effects of their genetically engineered products.

Monsanto has all of their angles covered, and as much as you want to hate them you have to respect how incredibly intricate and progressive they were in their agricultural evolution.
 

So what do we do about this shitty, shitty company?


Some protestors just can’t seem to get it right. via.

I can start by telling you what you shouldn’t do. Stop blaming technology for a problem that corrupt companies abuse. You not only take away form the actual issue, but you lose the support and interest of the scientific community when you make it out as if they are somehow responsible for the decisions and intents of a massive super-corp. Although there are a handful of scientists responsible for GMO tech abuse—the rest of the scientific community is a sensitive bunch, and if you blame science for the issue you lose sciences support of your concerns.

Secondly, showing up to the front lines of street level protests can be a respectable first step, but without taking any real action on a personal level it could be all for naught. A far more effective strategy to implement in addition to the march is taking direct action through your own personal consumer choices; ensuring that you don’t support Monsanto. Grow your own fruit and vegetable garden, support local, organic farmers, and educate yourself on the sub-companies and products that Monsanto creates or has a hand in. The less money that makes its way into their greedy pockets, the less power they have.

It’s nice to be around like-minded people and feel as though you are making a difference, but the fact of the matter is far too often the feeling of making a difference prevents people from actually taking steps that truly make the change occur.

Know the facts, determine the root cause of the problems you are trying to solve, and start with yourself—the rest is just lip service.

 

Follow Tommy on Twitter: @hybridtraining

Previously:

Agent Orange Kids

Fashion Is Destroying the Earth

This Man Thinks He Never Has to Eat Again

This Is What Quebec Separatism Looks Like in 2013

$
0
0

Quebec’s separatist movement has always hit home for me. Like tens of thousands of other English speakers (known as Anglophones in these parts), my parents moved away from la belle province in the 1980s because they were afraid Quebec would separate and their freedom to speak, get good service at restaurants, and to send my older brother to an English-speaking school would be lost forever. It might sound irrational now, but the situation was serious then. A terrorist group called the FLQ kidnapped Federalist politicians, the Federal government called in martial law, and in 1995 Quebec came within just 1% of separating from the rest of Canada.

Today, the Canadian government and mainstream dailies treat separatism like a “when pigs fly…” argument or something that could only happen in outer space. It’s no surprise that 61% of Canadians think Quebec has enough sovereignty within Canada and that number is only so low because 42% of Quebecers want to separate according to an Angus Reid poll. What’s more, the Clarity Act of 2000 essentially eliminates the possibility of legal separation now that the Federal government must approve any referendum question beforehand.

But separatists still exist. They won the 2012 provincial election; they are immigrants, activists, young people, academics and even Anglophones. I talked to a few of them to get their opinion on why leaving Canada makes sense.


Jean-Claude Sylvain Guay, 40, ran for leadership of the Bloc Québecois in 2011 and is an elected member of the PQ Executive Committee in the Mercier riding.

VICE: What’s the difference between separatism now and in 1960?
Jean-Claude: The sovereignty of 1960 was very left wing and progressive. It was a dream of the Quebecer who wanted to take back their territory, economy, politics and culture. It was a youthful nationalism. Today, it’s a more mature independence; more economic, with a rhetoric more focused on rational and logical economic ideas. The people want to know if it is viable, they don’t care about the cultural sentiment as much. We are now thinking more liberally and neo-liberally.

Would you create your own currency?
Economic questions like this are complex. There are things we can expect, but at this moment, we can’t expect to change the money immediately. We would keep the Canadian money simply to keep economic stability. There is certainly a risk in Quebec. We would have to take out loans. Investors are very interested in Quebec.

Despite the risks could Quebec survive economically?
The economic situation in Quebec is extremely favourable. In terms of income per capita we are less indebted than other countries. Our economic performance is surprising and we’re doing pretty well. Right now we are just a province without control over all our means, but if we had a sovereign state that would be a complete other thing. Quebec’s capacity to innovate and transform from our geniuses here is great. Think Cirque de Soleil, think about Quebecers in Las Vegas, Bombardier, software - the creators here are numerous.

How would the Anglophones fit in to a separate Quebec?
The Anglophones are also Quebecers, what’s important is that they feel Quebecois. There are people that feel Canadian and that’s fine. I feel that many Anglophones are feeling less and less Canadian. We can’t force people to love Quebec. There’s a lot of Anglophone media that are using fear. They say an independent Quebec is racist, xenophobic and wants to exterminate the English. There are people that compare us to Nazis, but that’s completely false.


Melanie Hotchkiss, 27, is an Anglophone who moved to Quebec in 1998 from Maryland, USA. She works as a Labour Union Organizer for the Public Service Alliance of Canada and voted for Québec Solidaire in 2012.

VICE: Why does Quebec need to separate?
Melanie:
When you look at the politics in Quebec and the people here, I think we’re just so different than the rest of Canada. You see the last federal elections the way that Quebec voted completely different than the rest of Canada and I think that’s a huge indicator of that.

But you’re an Anglophone.
I don’t see it as much as me as an Anglophone, but as somebody who immigrated here. Quebec is who welcomed me. When I got here I didn’t speak a word of French and because of Bill 101 they just threw me in school and were like “learn French.” But I had a positive experience with Bill 101 because honestly I’m a fluent speaker in French and I wouldn’t have it any other way. It’s not like I moved here and was like: “Hey I wanna move to Canada because I want to be Canadian.” I moved to Canada because my mom met her new husband on the Internet and he was a French-Quebecer so we came to Quebec. I didn’t even know people spoke French in Canada. So I got here and people were told me I had to learn French, I was like: “What! Where am I!?”

What about the Natives up north and the other Anglophones, how do they fit in to a separate Quebec?
I think that if they are already against sovereignty it could cause problems if people are not content with the result of separation occurring. I think it’s a myth if people think that Anglos are going to massively leave the province. That’s more fear mongering than anything else. There will be some that choose to leave, but I don’t think it will be a mass majority of people. 

What is one of the biggest misconceptions about separatism?
You normally correlate sovereignty to the Parti Québécois, and the PQ is seen as the ones who want to kill the English language and that’s why they are seen as so evil and sovereignty is so bad. I think the problem is that there’s a double standard where a lot of Anglos here are like: “But we’re a minority, and therefore people need to take that into account.” But it’s funny because, within Canada, the Francophone population is the minority and that's hard to reconcile. It’s kind of shitty when you think about it, because since “The Quiet Revolution” being Quebecer is a very Francophone sovereigntist thing and there are Quebecers who are born and raised in Montreal and have spoken English all their lives and they feel a bit like “well, I’m a Quebecer too.”


Leo Bureau-Blouin, 21, is an elected Member of Provincial Parliament for Laval-des-Rapides. At 20 he was the youngest person to be elected to the Quebec National Assembly in history. Last year he was President of the Quebec Federation of College Students and one of the three primary negotiators with the government during the student strike.

VICE: What’s the difference between separatism now and in 1960?
Leo:
I think the main difference between now and let’s say thirty years ago is that people in Quebec are more proud of who they are, they have the conviction that we can do our things and be a powerful nation. Just to give you an example, if Quebec was a country we would be the 19th wealthiest OECD country out of 35 and we’d be the 27th largest nation according to GDP out of 235 countries and regions. We now have powerful corporations like CGI, like Cirque de Soleil, like Bombardier that work in nations across the world. And I think we have more conviction in ourselves.

Even with those businesses how could you make up the $17.8 billion dollars of transfer payments given by the Federal government this year?
First of all, it’s a very interesting debate because often it’s one of the first arguments that people say. A few years ago people from Alberta even said that it was because of the equalization payments that Quebec pays for so many social services. That’s not exactly true because even wealthy provinces like Ontario receive equalization payments and there are six provinces that receive equalization payments. Ontario receives the least amount of equalization payments per citizen and after it’s Quebec as the second least. And it’s also important to mention that yes we receive equalization payments, but we are penalized by many Federal programs.


Nicolas Moran, 23, is studying law at UQAM. He graduated from the University of Sherbrooke with a Bachelor of Arts in Political Science and was an activist and anarchist on campus who participated in direct actions and mobilizations throughout his time there, as well as during the student strike.

VICE: Why are you a separatist?
Nicolas:
I don’t feel that the people who live in Quebec are part of the Canadian people. We are definitely different. And the thing that’s really sad about it is we’re gonna lose. The people who speak French in Canada are a minority and faced to a language like English we will disappear. Immigrants who come here see it as being way more advantageous to learn English rather than French and you know what, they know that we will comply with them. We will eventually serve them in English, even though we pretend that we’re tough and we only want to speak French we eventually always fold.

What’s different about separatism today?
The difference today is that we’re still a minority, but the thing is, our will to fight has disappeared with the fact that some Francophones have integrated the bourgeoisie and they agree with the fact that (whether they try to lie or not) English is the international language and that personal human rights must be placed before group rights. For example, the right for parents to send their kids to an English school. Obviously if these kids go to an English school they won’t learn French as well as if they would go in a French school. And what’s going to happen is that it’s going to become the language that they’re going to use every day and they’re going to become Anglophones. In Rome, do as the Romans do and that’s exactly what I expect from people coming to Quebec. Just please try to learn the language. They don’t! They don’t try, they’re not passionate, they don’t care about it and then they act as victims when we try to put measures in place to defend our rights. It’s a n’importe quoi esti.


Catherine Dorion, 30, co-founded the Option Nationale party with leader Jean-Martin Aussant. She ran as a candidate in the Taschereau riding in Quebec City in the 2012 election.

VICE: Is Quebec separatism popular right now?
Catherine:
It’s not popular, but it is changing really fast. I really feel that something is happening now because when I started being an activist five years ago it was so not fashionable. People wouldn’t even talk about it when they were sovereigntist. We still have this number that is 40% of Quebecers want sovereignty [Ed: 37% according to Léger Marketing poll, 42% Angus Reid poll], but what is changing is that the most influential people in society like the educated, the youth, influential journalists and bloggers, so this idea is becoming fashionable again.

People have said the Quebec separatism movement has been racist since the 1995 referendum when Jacques Parizeau blamed “money and the ethnic vote” for the referendum loss. Is it?
What Parizeau said was really sad, but it was true. But, it just means that some communities publically decided to say that they sided with the no side and they invited their communities to vote no. It’s not because of that that we exclude them. On the contrary, I even think that if we can convince more immigrants to come with us, it will help convince Quebecers that are not sure because Quebecers are so afraid to look like racist like people or not nice. We’re just so afraid to harm people; it’s a collective trait of Quebecers. 

 

Follow Joel on Twitter: @JoelBalsam
 

More on Quebec Separatism:

Shut Up and Learn French

Boulechite-101

Question of the Day: Should Quebec Separate from Canada

Unicode Is the New Internet Gold Mine

$
0
0


Pim Roes with his cat.

There’s a saying among expats in Hanoi: “Vietnam is the best party in the world, so long as you don’t question the party.” The threat of the hardline communist government raining down upon you with its iron fists is enough to ensure that most just keep their heads down and continue with their office jobs, sex tourism, animal abuse, or whatever it is that they're there to do.

So when the country's leading lights made an ambitious and arguably misguided $100 million bid to oust Google as the country's primary search engine with a new company called "Cốc Cốc," expats might have felt it wise to stay out of the way. When Dutch expat Pim Roes heard about the plans, however, he didn't stand aside for these captains of Vietnamese industry. Instead, he put himself right in their way, registering the domain name www.cốccốc.com, which, unlike the official www.coccoc.com website, contains the company name with its full Vietnamese characters.

That might not mean too much quite yet, but Pim has been quick to recognize the potential for grabbing websites and domain names using Unicode (those country-specific accents and characters, to you and me). So that when Unicodes inevitably take off (as Pim is adamant they will) and these companies want to register their domains with the characters they actually use in their names, they'll have to go through Pim first.

I caught up with him to find out a little more about his domain-grabbing and how he plans to proceed with his squatting of the multi-million dollar juggernaut aiming to boot Google out of Southeast Asia. 


The homepage of Cốc Cốc, the site whose domain Pim has squatted. 

VICE: Hi, Pim. So how did this all come about?
Pim Roes: Normally, if I read anything in the news about Google launching a new service or a new movie coming out, the first thing I’ll check is if the domain name is still available. I've done it before, too. When I heard that the new James Cameron film is going to be called The Informationist, I quickly snapped up www.the-informationist.com.

Why?
Sometimes I do it for money, but it’s certain that if I don’t do it someone else will, and it’s likely to be lucrative. Sometimes they’ll threaten to sue you and then you have to decide if you want to ask for money or hand it over for free and avoid any legal trouble, so there isn’t much to lose. With Cốc Cốc, I heard about the company, checked if the domain name was available and then registered it for $8. In this case I didn’t really do it for money, I just saw that it was there and realized this would be potentially valuable—not necessarily in financial terms—so I took it.

That sounds either very clever or very stupid. Rebels haven’t done too well in Vietnam in the past…
I didn’t intend to hijack their brand name, I just recognized the significance of this particular address. I’m not really afraid of lawyers as I can always just give it back for free—I’ve had threats in the past, but I’ve always cooperated. In terms of the countries involved, I have to be careful what I say as I’m very much aware this is being recorded. With this, I’m not really standing in their way too much as most users will still go to coccoc.com, without the Unicode. But if they want to become as big as Google then they need to consider elements like this. 

So were they careless to push ahead with this huge project without safeguarding the domain name?
I wouldn’t necessarily say they were careless, as Unicodes as domain names are still a relatively new concept and only came into use in 2010. You wouldn’t expect your typical developer to know too much about them, but with the level of staff Cốc Cốc has, you’d hope the people in charge of choosing the domain name would have knowledge on the subject. It’s my prediction that in ten years' time Unicodes are going to be the innovation people will be kicking themselves for not getting involved with in the early stages, in much the same way that people regret not registering domains like pizza.com and insurance.com in the days before the internet boom. All money made from the internet comes from discovering the small improvements and ideas that people are not yet doing, so small insights can become very lucrative.


Insurance.com, AKA the only insurance domain that doesn't need opera singers or meerkats to remain popular.

Have you had any contact from Cốc Cốc so far?
I met one guy who works for them at a house party and he was pretty cool, but other than that, nothing. It’s strange, because with so many people working for them in Hanoi, I’d expect to have encountered a few more. I actually emailed them to say I was surprised to find that cốccốc.com hadn’t been registered and asked whether they’d heard of Unicodes. I told them I paid $8 for the domain name, but they could have it back for free once the transfer lock of 60 days had passed, so we’ll have to see what they say.

Right... If you don’t want money, then why did you do it?
I just did it as a small thing for a laugh, really. I shared it with my friends on Facebook to show them what I’d done and see their response. Hopefully Cốc Cốc might like me for it and thank me for the tip. I once hacked the website of a major political party and then emailed to let them know of the weak point in their site. They were really grateful and sent me a T-shirt with that country’s prime minister on it. With Cốc Cốc, I partly did it because I’d like to meet their developers and share ideas. I used to work as a developer in Dublin and there were loads of like-minded people to talk to, but there don’t seem to be many of those in Hanoi, so it would just be nice to start a dialogue.

What’s the moral position in developer circles on using other sites’ intended traffic to make money?
Lots of traffic comes through search engines rather than direct visits, so most of the sites I make focus on ensuring high rankings in search engines. People are unbelievably reliant on search engines; for a long time, the top search term on Google was actually "Google," as well as being the top term on Bing. People are so drilled in getting to search engines that they don’t actually realize they’re already on one. By that same token, it means hijacking domain names (registering sites with accents or familiar typing mistakes, "like facebookk.com," for example) isn’t too damaging to big sites, as the bulk of their visits come from search engines. 

Can you make a lot of money out of it?
Yeah, if you have enough domain names in the right places, you can make a killing. I know one guy who made it his business—he bought thousands of domain names similar to popular sites and became rich very quickly just through Adsense and affiliate marketing. I think it’s a legitimate way to make money, just as long as you don’t misuse that site by tricking the user into thinking they’re actually on Facebook and stealing their data.

What kind of sites have you created in the past?
All sorts. I’ve currently got around 50 sites, which in total attract 2.5 million visitors per month. Some of my celebrity sites listing stars’ heights or showing pictures of them without make-up are pretty popular. And then I’ve got others, such as websites listing popular baby names, which is a great one for running in multiple languages as it’s of universal interest and unlikely to attract anything controversial that might piss off advertisers. There are also the funny ones, like kick-a-ginger-day.com, which started as a joke on South Park and then gained media attention, so I bought the domain name and knocked up a website. I’ve actually sold quite a bit of merchandise on there as well.

So what advice can you give me for making internet millions?
The thing with the internet is that if you get the right domain name, you can make easy money for doing nothing. But you generally need to have years of experience in programming, as well as studying user behavior, advertising, and marketing. The people I know who are good at making money online were interested in the industry from a very young age, whereas those who study it may learn techniques but won’t necessarily have the great ideas. Money-making ideas are usually very simple, but you have to be the first person to have ever come up with them. Being first and having no competition is the best situation, then when more players come into the market you have to be the best. Be first, then be best.

Great. Thanks, Pim!

Follow Jak on Twitter: @JakPhillips

More stuff about the internet:

What the Fuck Is the Internet?

Girls and the Internet

Internet Psychonauts Try All the Drugs You Don't Want to Try 

I Made a Searchable Database of Comments from Toronto's Casino Survey

$
0
0


The No Casino Toronto logo, from their Facebook page, that has over 16,000 fans.

After an online survey was conducted in January to gauge the public's views on a Toronto casino, as part of a process that cost taxpayers $370,000, the results show that most Torontonians never wanted a casino in the first place. In fact, over 70 percent of the 18,000 Torontonians who responded to the online survey opposed the building of a casino in the city's downtown core.

$370,000 is a big number (apparently that’s what it costs to debate the existence of a hypothetical casino in Canada’s largest city for 14 months) that was only revealed yesterday following a formal inquiry by Councillor Mary Fragedakis.

City manager Joe Pennachetti unveiled the $370,000 figure on Monday in a letter to council. This figure did not include the cost of the hours that dozens of city employees devoted to the casino file – costs which would have increased the total significantly.

Of the $370,000, $313,000 went to consultants: $135,000 to Ernst and Young for a study; $155,000 to DPRA to assist with the public consultation process including the online survey; and $22,000 to Environics for a poll on the issue.

Considering the overwhelming negative reaction by the public to the casino plans, the cost of these discussions—which just reaffirmed what many already knew—only serves to rub salt into this fiscal wound.

So, I decided that it was only right that considering the survey cost the Toronto taxpayer thousands of dollars, they should be made aware of, and have access to, the collected data in the form of a searchable database.

How did I do this? Well, getting the raw data was the easy part.

Thankfully, I didn’t have to submit any time-sapping Freedom of Information requests to the City of Toronto—the survey data was published as an Excel spreadsheet as part of the City’s Open Data catalogue.

But most Torontonians wouldn’t have known about this wonderful resource—until now.

I downloaded the large spreadsheet that had over 1.2 million cells of data to sift through.

The data within corresponds to responses given by the public to 11 questions concerning the casino. I decided to only use answers given to the first two-part question in the survey, namely “Please indicate on the scale below how you feel about having a new casino in Toronto” and “What are your main reasons for this rating?”

Respondents could enter up to three reasons for their feelings towards the casino—and this explains why there are over 40,000 comments in the database from 18,000 respondents.

With 70% of Torontonians in opposition to the casino, there are a ton of angry comments in here. Some of the more notable ones include:

“I know what happens to cities who fall for this shit statistically.”

“A casino is just making money off peoples addictions, It is no different then selling drugs.”

You're asking for the mafia to get deeper roots in this city”

“crappy jobs (pardon the pun), rather than high skill jobs”

“my mother lost 1 million dollars+ to a gambling addiction after my fathers death”

But anyway, to complete the database I deleted the extraneous columns of data and uploaded them as a new online spreadsheet on Google Drive. Using Google’s Visualization API and PHPI created a basic form that queries this Google document.

Easy, right?

Using a pivot table within the spreadsheet I also uncovered some telling statistics:

12,654 - or 71 percent - of respondents opposed a casino in downtown Toronto

12,179 - or 69 percent - of respondents felt a casino did not fit their image of Toronto

So for the first time, you can search the database of these online survey comments below, and see what Torontonians had to say about the casino.

Manually enter a search phrase like "small business", "crime," or "gambling" in the text field to search the database.

Unsure what to search for? Use the Rob Ford shaped word cloud above for tips.

As you’ll see the overwhelming response was a resounding (casi)no – it’s just a shame most taxpayers had to pay for something they already knew.

 

Previously:

The Facebook Comments Rob Ford's Staffers Don't Want You to See

Edward Snowden and the PRISM Leak: A Comic

$
0
0

You might remember Claire Milbrath from the freakily quaint sex comics she drew for us a while ago, or maybe you even recall that gallery we ran of her photography? Either way, Claire runs Editorial Magazine out in Montreal and has apparently became quite interested in the Edward Snowden story because last night she sent us this comic about how, according to her imagination, the leak went down.

Edward has left his hotel in Hong Kong and is presumably now seeking refuge. No one knows where he is, but we know that he has left his luxurious life in the sun behind. Enjoy this comic for now and we'll keep you posted on the next development in this incredibly fucked up story.


More on Edward Snowden and PRISM:

Canadians Should Be Concerned About the NSA and PRISM

The United States Is Wiretapping Our Internet


America’s Not-So-Secret Paranoid Underbelly

$
0
0

The question of whether you believe in conspiracy theories is surprisingly tricky. You may not think that the moon landing or Beyoncé’s pregnancy was fake, you may not imagine lizards lurking behind Donald Rumsfield and Dick Cheney’s faces, but by now you probably know that the US government is operating a massive secret surveillance apparatus, which would sound like a paranoid fantasy if it weren’t true. And many, many Americans profess some level of credulity when it comes to some conspiracies, which at times can seem less crazy than believing that there’s never, ever, a man behind the curtain pulling strings.  

Free-floating fear and half-baked ideas about what’s really going on have been a more significant part of American history than is generally accepted, according to Jesse Walker’s thorough, meticulously researched book, The United States of Paranoia. “Pundits tend to write off political paranoia as a feature of the fringe,” he writes in his introduction. “They’re wrong. The fear of conspiracies has been a potent force across the political spectrum, from the colonial era to the present, in the establishment as well as the extremes.” He then goes on to explore what amounts to an alternate history of the US—from the Puritans’ panic over witches and colonial Americans' panics about Indians plotting in the wilderness or slaves concocting murderous rebellions to Watergate and the FBI’s often bizarre, occasionally illegal COINTELPRO operations to batshit (and sometimes ironic) theories about UFOs and the Illuminati to the fear of Satanists in the 80s to the militia movement to 9/11 Truthers to people who are paranoid about paranoid conspiracy theorists. Along the way there are fascinating tangents about now-mostly-forgotten fringe figures like John Todd, who traveled around the country in the 70s spinning insane tales to church congregations of how witches and the Illuminati controlled everything from the military to rock music. (Todd had a long history of coercing underage girls into sex, and he was finally sent to prison in 1988 for rape.)

If that sounds at all interesting, you should read the book when it comes out on August 20. I recently chatted with Jesse about conspiracies, rumor, and how people come to believe the things they do.   

VICE: You take a long historical view of conspiracy theories in America. Do you think we’re more paranoid than we used to be?
Jesse Walker: I don’t think so. I’m not quite sure how I would even measure that, given what the baseline of paranoia is. What I do think happens is that the direction of the paranoia shifts. One thing I mentioned in the book was how a lot of people started saying after Obama got elected, “Ooh, the right wing has suddenly gotten very paranoid.” In fact, in the Bush era, there were tons of right-wing conspiracy theories, it’s just that they weren’t about the government. They were aimed mostly at people outside America’s borders. With another party in power, [the right] has rediscovered some of its libertarian impulses. A lot of discussions about the United States becoming more paranoid or less paranoid just has to do with what kind of paranoia people are paying attention to.

The recent revelations about the NSA and FBI’s monitoring of cell phone metadata and internet communications make me wonder if it’s possible that the government itself is paranoid.
I can’t get into the head of the average NSA bureaucrat enacting a program. But I think that the creation of that sort of system obviously has to do with fear and paranoia. I should stress I’m using the word paranoid in a colloquial way. I should just be saying “fear.” Another problem has to do with the way “conspiracy theory” gets used, because people who use the phrase conspiracy theory disparagingly believe in all sorts of conspiracies, it’s just that they say, “Well those are true, so they don’t count.” What they really mean when they say “conspiracy theory” is, at best, “nutty conspiracy theory,” and, at worst, “conspiracy theory that feeds into an ideology that I don’t share, which I will therefore think of as nutty.” But I’ve forgotten your original question.

I wanted to know whether you thought that this surveillance was a result of institutional paranoia on the government’s part.
I wrote about moral panics in the book, and one way that sociologists distinguish moral panics from other phenomena is the residue that a moral panic leaves. A lot of times, there’s the residue of a new law, a new bureaucracy, which then have momentum of their own. The story of the growth of the FBI is the story of J. Edgar Hoover finding one wave of fear to ride after another. First it’s white slavery, then it’s Communists, then he’s told to back off the political surveillance, but when FDR is afraid of the far right he leaps onto that, and he moves into the far left. And then in the early 60s he uses the fear of the Ku Klux Klan to get liberals to sign off on things that he uses against the New Left. It’s masterful. Hoover clearly was an adept bureaucratic warrior. But he was also clearly paranoid. He imagined all sorts of conspiracies that in many cases weren’t there, and in many cases were, in his imagination, much larger and more powerful than they were in real life.

In the process of researching this book, did you get any insight into how people wind up believing what most of us would regard as really extreme, nonsensical conspiracy theories?
I hate to generalize about these kinds of things. When people talk about looking for what are the common patterns of people becoming, we’ll say for sake of a phrase, “extreme conspiracy theorists,” what they’re really looking at is how people adopt belief systems in general. There’s all sorts of conversion experiences people have that can lead them to embracing a worldview, whether it’s religious, or political, or whatever. That said, conspiracy theories have to do with our ability to see patterns. [Paranoia is] where our drive to find patterns and create narratives meets our capacity for fear, especially fear of people who, one way or another, are removed from us—whether they’re from another culture or higher or lower in the social hierarchy or they just have different politics. I find that people grab onto compelling narratives and they don’t always know how to weigh evidence very well. And I don’t just mean that in the context of conspiracy theories. I just mean that there are people who, once they’ve adopted a worldview, find it very easy to accept claims without examining them thoroughly. Everybody can fall into this.

Do you think it’s ever a good thing to be paranoid?
I don’t want to tell people to be paranoid. There are certainly plenty of times when it makes sense to be suspicious. My own framework of dealing with the world is to distrust narratives in general, because I know how easy it is to construct one. Conspiracy theorists, at large, are most compelling when they are finding holes in narratives that everyone else automatically believes without looking too carefully at them. And they’re least compelling when they’re building narratives of their own.

You have a long chapter about what you call the “ironic style” of conspiracy theorists, which refers to people who appreciate conspiracies for their own sake. Do you consider yourself one of those ironists?
I think in many ways the book is covertly, or maybe not so covertly, a case for the ironic style. It’s not just a matter of appreciating [conspiracy theories] as jokes. It’s appreciating them as world views, appreciating them as creations, appreciating them in the same way that someone who doesn’t necessarily believe in a religious faith can still enjoy the products of that faith. There are people who are like, “I want to read about conspiracy theories” in this ironic, distanced way and laugh at them. There are people who see a conspiracy tract as science fiction written by someone who didn’t realize he was writing science fiction. Then there are ironists who risk falling into paranoia. In the book, I talk about a couple people who fall down the rabbit hole because they started taking their own creations too seriously. The ironic style isn't just about humor. It's about finding metaphors and insights in the conspiracy stories people come up with whether or not those stories are true. And that's what my book is trying to do too: to go beyond just accepting or debunking a conspiracy theory and see what we can learn about America by exploring the stories that caught on.

A point I try to stress in the book is that even a conspiracy theory that says absolutely nothing true about the external world does say something true about the anxieties and experiences of the people who believe it. One example that I mention in the book is the claim that white doctors were deliberately injecting black babies with AIDS. There’s no evidence for that. But while investigating that theory, you can’t stop there. You have to go on to ask, “Why did people believe this was true?” And in fact, there is this long history of the secretive medical mistreatment of black people, which includes the Tuskegee experiment and all sorts of other things. There were these rumors about night doctors [who would supposedly secretly experiment on African Americans] and it’s really unclear to what extent those were true. Historians who look at this are very cautious, because it’s entirely possible that hospitals were seriously abusing the rights of people from the underclass. We’re trying to piece it together from such incomplete evidence that there’s always going to be question marks. There’s a spectrum that on one end has stuff that’s accepted as historical fact and on the other contains weird fantasies. But these aren’t completely separate categories because there’s this whole realm of possibilities in between.

Jesse Walker’s The United States of Paranoia will hit stores on August 20, but you can pre-order a copy on Amazon here.

@HCheadle

More on conspiracies and those who believe them:

Conspiracy Theorists Are Dangerous Enemies to Make

The Frenzied Conspiracy Theories of Jeff Boss

In Defense of Paranoia

We Dug Up Chance the Rapper's Pre-'Acid Rap' Material

$
0
0
We Dug Up Chance the Rapper's Pre-'Acid Rap' Material

We Watched Anti-Capitalists Try to Bring Chaos to London Yesterday

$
0
0

This weekend, leaders of the eight richest countries in the world are converging in Northern Ireland. There, they will pose for the cameras, make idle chit-chat about wishing they were in Dublin so they could visit the Guinness factory, keep schtum about those pesky, enduring remnants of the Troubles and discuss capitalism's continued dominance of the Earth.

Unsurprisingly, it’s that last bit of the annual G8 summit that tends to wind up anyone who labels themselves an anti-capitalist. And yesterday, a load of them got together in central London to publicly air their grievances ahead of the meeting.

While there will also be protests held in Northern Ireland itself, many protesters weren't sure they wanted to travel all the way to a rural golf resort just to fight a sea of cops in the only part of the UK where they're allowed to use water cannons. As well as that, extra police and judges have been drafted in to help the authorities in County Fermanagh cope with the expected increase in the number of arrests, which is only going to act as more of a turn-off.

So, to keep the flame burning, activists have called for a week of protests in London – where a lot of the companies getting rich off the misery of the poor actually operate – in the lead-up to the G8 summit proper. We headed to the West End yesterday in the hope of watching some anti-capitalists kick the arses of blood-diamond magnates up and down Piccadilly. Or at least smash a few windows. 

We arrived in Soho to find the police evicting a disused former police station that had been squatted by a group of activists, some of whom had arrived from locales far outside of London. The group were using the building as their HQ, presumably because it was the most brazen fuck you to The Man they could muster. And, predictably, it was a fuck you that the police responded to by sending a ridiculous number of officers down to kick the 40 or so activists out.    

Cops forced their way in with angle grinders and reportedly smacked one activist in the mouth, splitting his lip. It all got too much for one guy up on the roof who nearly martyred himself, only to be tackled by cops before he could leap to his death.

Behind the cordon, one of the activists’ friends told any of the passing tourists and bike couriers who'd listen that this was an illegal eviction engineered to crack down on political dissent. But the lorry driver next to him didn't seem concerned with state oppression, he was just a bit furious that the whole thing was blocking the road. In his opinion, the activists should all have been arrested.

"You shouldn’t be allowed to protest these days!” he reasoned. By "these days", I assume he meant any time his route involved driving down Beak Street. Unless he was making a wider condemnation on the state of activism in 2013.

Up the road at Oxford Circus, 300 or so anti-capitalist protesters were determined to go about their day’s business despite the plight of their squatter friends. In preparation for the big day, a map of the West End's most reprehensible capitalists had been prepared, including banks, hedge funds, oil companies, corporate PR agencies, weapons manufacturers and nightclubs that charge you £10 for a Pepsi. The map made me wonder if an anarchist group had been infiltrated by someone who makes infographics for the Guardian.

Anyway, the plan, as usual, was to go to these dens of fatcat inequity and try to disrupt them in some way. The march set off, but before anybody had a chance to even grimace in the direction of a city slicker, the police started pulling people out of the crowd to stop and search them.

The biggest crime anybody had committed so far was to walk menacingly down a street and, generally speaking, anarchists tend not to be the biggest fans of getting stopped and searched. So things got pretty chaotic very quickly.

The black bloc protesters broke into a sprint as they tried to put a safe distance between themselves and the police, causing a stampede in the process. Cops and activists played a human tug of war, using as their rope those activists who'd been trampled and caught – police trying to grapple them into their wagons, their mates trying to haul them to safety.  

People were knocked to the ground and I saw one woman faint into someone’s arms for a couple of seconds, before shouting that she'd just been, “Punched by a fucking pig,” as she came to.

Heavy-handed policing of the 2009 G20 protests in London infamously resulted in the death of Ian Tomlinson, a newspaper vendor who hadn't even been involved in the protest. That memory didn’t seem to be playing too heavily on the minds of the riot cops, as they took protesters out like bowling pins, slamming their heads into the pavement.

Those who didn’t end up eating tarmac took the opportunity to lead the police on a wild goose chase around the West End. Being at the less violent end of the activism scale, following this group mostly involved being surrounded by comedy wigs, righteous whistle-blowing (as in actual whistles, not the Ed Snowden type) and Marks & Spencer quinoa salads.

After a while, things started to die down, but then we came to a halt outside BP – one of the biggest targets on the protesters' capitalist pig map. However, everyone was a little bit tired from all the running. It was time to chillax for a sec and have a rest. You know how it is: sometimes it's better to just let the oligarchs and slum lords off with a warning and have a chat about how bad they are.

People stood around catching their breath and looking a little frustrated, listening to this guy and taking photos of him on their camera-phones as he made a quick speech about why he was opposing the G8; corporations using sweat-shop labour, destroying the environment, etc, etc.

And then we were off again, running through the streets to nowhere in particular. It was as if today’s anti-capitalist activists spent last summer glued to Mo Farah at the Olympics rather than studying Noam Chomsky in darkened New Cross squats.

Tourists looked on, shocked and appalled. Or maybe that's just the face you instinctively pull as soon as you realise you've paid £7 for tea and a croissant.

After some more running around, everyone eventually congregated at Piccadilly Circus, to bask in the glow of the huge illuminated adverts for global corporations while they held their anti-capitalist street party. Which basically involved standing around, being knackered, chatting and listening to music.

Oh, and some awful comedy routines. This master ironist started telling everyone that his very rich boss was paying him a few grand to be there and tried to goad the protesters by telling them how poor they all are. When a couple of people thought he was being serious and shouted at him to "fuck off", I decided it was time to leave.

By the end of the day, 32 people had been arrested in a fully-formed example of extreme police overkill. Of course, that overkill was most likely calculated to kick an already limping protest movement in the balls as it continually fails to galvanise support, even as those on the bottom rung of society wallow in austerity gloom.

A financial journalist I spoke to told me the markets had continued to do what they do unhindered. The police weren’t willing to put up with any fucking about yesterday, or even the hint that you might be the kind of person who could maybe be up for some fucking about. They’ll probably be even less fun in Northern Ireland in a few days' time, when a meeting between some of the world's most powerful people needs to be policed, rather than some nonviolent activists waving placards around and having discussions in empty buildings.

Follow Simon (@simonchilds13) and Tom (@tomjohnsonuk) on Twitter, and see more of Tom's work here.

More stuff about the G8 summit and anti-capitalists:

Loads of People in the UK's 'City of Culture' Really Hate the UK

This Guy Took Out a Gigantic Loan to Destroy the Financial System

The People of Hastings Still Do May Day the Traditional Way

The NSA's Data Collection Habits Are Trickling Down to Cops

$
0
0
The NSA's Data Collection Habits Are Trickling Down to Cops

A Ghost Story

$
0
0


All illustrations courtesy of the Naruyama Gallery.

I am sure if I had accepted a certain marriage proposal, my life might have continued in an ordinary way, but I refused that humiliation. Later when I would have accepted it, the suitor had passed away. It was of natural causes. 

My father disowned me, and for a while I lived in a women’s dormitory. When my resources were exhausted, I spent several years doing the things that I needed to do. It was at this time that I began to see black ghosts.

My mother received a report of my circumstances from my aunt, and she begged my father to send me to the city, where he owned several apartment buildings. Seven years had passed, and his temper had subsided. He agreed on the condition that my mother join me in the city and supervise his properties.

When I was growing up, my mother had enjoyed an active social life, but that had changed since she began to have eczema. It covered her shoulders, arms, legs, stomach, and face. She bathed in a potassium-permanganate solution, but it only reduced the itching and dyed our bathtub indigo. 

She had become a shut-in and then an intellectual. In the city, she watched silent movies at night. She saw poetry in her old ghost movies, and watched them over and over again. I don’t like ghost movies, even from the silent era. She watched them late at night, in her room, on her laptop computer and in the morning, she talked to me about the actors.

“Ichikawa Danjũrõ IX was opposed to appearing on-screen, but he was convinced that to do so was a gift to posterity. He is said to have channeled Tokinoriki very well. A few years ago I read Tokinoriki again. I was forced to read excerpts in school, but I could not get past the intricacies of court protocol, and the opacity of Taira’s diction. I don’t know what has happened, but the text has opened up for me and now it is like I am speaking to a friend.” 

“That is fascinating,” I said. A gust of wind blew through the tree outside, and petals landed on the dining table. Ghosts are not all bad.

***

I earned significant sums of money irregularly doing translation for foreign speakers. I had an office south of the old palace. Every year after 25, a woman diminishes in value. After 31, time is up. It was different in my case because I was in communication with the black ghosts.  

Edward was introduced to me by email through Murata’s press agent. I was surprised and even confused by his note. I read and then reread it. Yes, I thought. He is flirting.

He took a place in my thoughts, and I formed an impression that he was desperate and insane, like most lonely people. It is ordinary to keep the translator in the loop when laying out the brochure, in case of misunderstandings. In fact, some clients ask me to handle this and other organizational matters, but I suspected Edward was different. When he sent his picture to the graphics department, I thought, He is handsome. But anyone can appear that way.

During our first telephone conversation we spoke about the logistics of his visit. Due to the time change, I spoke to him from my bed. My mother was watching a movie with a piano soundtrack turned up very loud, and I heard something new in Edward’s voice. It was a precise intelligence. I explained to him that, depending on the duration of his stay, it would be customary for me to provide some guidance to the city. 

***

Edward called frequently after that. Due to the time change, I always received his calls at night. The third or fourth time we spoke I had been drinking, and we began to speak personally. He told me about his history of drinking, and his recovery. I told him that I lived with my mother in an apartment, and I didn’t speak to my father. 

He said, “Why do I always fall in love with unusual women?” 

“What do you mean?”

Murata had placed Edward in the outlying areas for one week and in the city for four days. Although Murata had recommended a country-based English-language translator, he and Edward did not get along. Also, Edward said, the other translator’s English was good, but he was unable to understand subtleties, such as humor and tone. We agreed it would make more sense for me to come to the country. He said that he would speak to the press agent at Murata and arrange for us to stay at different hotels, but I told him that would not be necessary. 

It’s hard to lie to my mother, because she is an expert liar. I told her that I was going to the country for work, to translate for a Murata guest speaker for the cotton panel. I said, “She is supposed to be quite an influential business lady.”

My mother said, “If you want to go and meet a man, I am happy for you. By all means, do what is necessary to change your situation.”

***

Since the incident, I did not drink, due to a court order. Occasionally, however, I drank with my mother in small amounts, or alone at a place around the corner. I confessed this to Edward. I said, “Earlier tonight I had wine with my mother. Generally I don’t enjoy drinking wine, but sometimes we share a bottle. My mother likes white wines.” 

“One bottle between two people is not a lot of wine.”

“I take more than my share, and besides, I am not supposed to drink at all.”

“Why aren’t you supposed to?”

“The courts have said I can never drink. I wore a monitoring anklet for one year. However, there are other opinions on the matter. I would like to talk about it, but I am not permitted to do so. It’s the culture.”

He said, “I like the way you talk after you’ve had a glass or two of wine. You should have one before we meet. We are all human.”

“But I can’t.”

“Why?”

“Because you do not drink. I think it is healthier if we both do not drink when we are together.”

“That’s true. I do think it’s healthier in the long run, for me, if you don’t drink, but the first night we meet, I want you to be happy and relaxed. I think that would be good for us.”

***

I took the train to the country. The train was full and I had to stand. A boy in his school blazer was eating chips and drinking a large can of beer. He had frizzy hair and pockmarked skin. The bar in the dining car was crowded with men in black suits. I ordered a mixed drink, but my adrenaline overrode the alcohol, and I had to order two more to feel any effect. Then I had a fourth, but I didn’t drink it all. I have always had a temper. At 23 I was in a relationship with a man. It seemed like a good relationship, but I always had a funny feeling. Sometimes he would text message on his side, with his back directed to block his screen. He often went for appointments and came back vague about what had passed. When I was suspicious, he was accusing. It went on like this for two years. I always had a strange feeling, like he could give me something that I wanted, but I did not know what it was. He had scratches on his back one night and when I asked him why, he said we should see his psychologist. She was an old lady and he had her completely fooled. He lied to her about his symptoms to receive certain medications. When I told her my fears, she said they stemmed from my bad relationship with my father. Then I came home early one day from work and found him in bed with a girl I had known a long time. She was a girl who didn’t have any thoughts of her own. She was always a little bit poorer and a little bit uglier, but she would show off to me.

I said, “At least I know the truth.”

He said, “And what is the truth?”

Isn’t it funny that this simple conversation would lead to manslaughter? Once two old men who guarded my father’s building fought over a game of chess. They had worked together for seven years and were best friends, but their words turned to blows and—with no premeditation or intent—one killed the other. Something similar happened between me and my friend. Since that night, she has been a vegetable.

***

Edward was taller than me by two inches. He had eyes like a boy who had ridiculed me when I was a child. That boy was an only child. Once his mother tried to start a riot on the soccer field. She broke a piece off the barrier fence and stormed onto the playing field. If you ever said that to the boy who had ridiculed me, he turned red and shouted, “Lies!” That was a lot of fun. Another fun thing, his stepsister had a disability, and she talked with a funny voice. It was fun in the afternoons to call her, and ask for her on the phone. Her father was one of those adults who is intimidated by young children, so for a long time when we asked, he put her on the phone. Then you could imitate her voice. But after a while, the father refused to put her on the phone, so then we tormented him. We imitated his voice, and that was even better.

“I think I know you,” Edward said. I shook his hand. He put an arm around my waist and took my hip. He said, “I am glad you are so small.”

I said, “We should go to baggage claim.”

Suitcases were coming off the ramp. People stood in a crowd around the chute.

“I was worried,” he said. “I got so lucky. My previous wife was not fat, exactly.”

He got his hand under my shirt and squeezed my side. He stuck his fingers into my ribs. “I was thinking, ‘What am I going to do if she’s fat?’”

I slipped out of his arm and said, “Which one is your bag?”

“It’s that one.” He pointed to a beat-up suitcase. He picked it up. It looked heavy, and I noticed that he was strong.

***

I had explained previously that it was not possible for me to sleep with a man before marriage, and getting into his hotel bed, I reminded him of this. I said, “I will only be able to rest beside you.”

He said, “Of course,” and a couple minutes later I was shouting. I realized after that I had shouted something profane. It was something I did a couple of times that night. 

Later, I was on top of him. Our hotel room overlooked an athletic center. The center was closed after nine o’clock, but two black people were there. They were walking on an asphalt track. They were walking in the particular way, slowly and without looking around. They did not bounce up and down with each step. It almost looked as if they were floating above the ground. One wore a hooded coat made of satin. Edward said, “Why are you staring out the window?”

Toward dawn he asked, “Do you like me?”

“I’m not sure.”

“Well, you shouldn’t fuck someone unless you like them. You should at least wait until you’re sure.”

I didn’t answer. 

“I’m sorry,” he said. “I think I deserved that.”

***

His presentation the following morning was at TEC conference center. He opened it with a long and complicated joke. It would not translate to the audience, and so I said, “The businessman has made a joke, so everyone please laugh now.” 

Since we were not drinking, we ate at restaurants and we saw movies. One movie was in 3D, and as a joke we put our glasses on before the previews, which made us seem foolish to the other people in the theater. 

“I’m not seeing the effects at all,” Edward said.

“I can see them,” I said, looking at my hand.

“Wait, maybe now I see,” Edward said. Then he whispered, “They are worried we’re going to be like this the whole movie.”

We had not ordered popcorn. The man beside us was fat, and he had a big bucket of popcorn. Edward saw me looking at it and said, “We’ll just ask that fella there.” My ghosts took care of it. About 15 minutes into the movie, the fat man walked out. He left his popcorn in his chair.

I said, “Take it,” and Edward did.

It was a midnight showing. It let out after 2 AM. A strange figure stood on the landing of the movie theater, a black woman. She stood one or two flights up, against the stucco exterior of the theater. She was maybe 40 years old. She wore a shapeless black dress. She might have been homeless. She watched us.

“Look,” I said. “Look at that strange woman.”

“She looks like the women who come to you in dreams.”

“It’s funny that you say that.”

“I think she is a man.”

I didn’t say, “That is not a human at all.”

The woman moved, and I saw it was a teenage boy. He wore a black shirt and black shorts that reached his knees. I said, “Let’s hurry and get to the hotel. Let’s take a car.”

By chance one passed, and I flagged it down. Edward followed me into the backseat. But our driver got onto a one-way going the wrong way, then took an inappropriate turn and took us onto an express lane. I wanted to tell Edward things that should not ever be spoken. Some things should not ever be spoken, and so I just said again and again, “This is strange.”

In the lane of opposing traffic, a Camaro pulled up beside us. It was driving backward, against the flow of traffic in its own lane, so that it drove parallel to Edward and me. Inside were two young black men, who both turned to regard us. 

I said, “I think I better stop.” And Edward said, “I feel like I have been sucked into your universe.” 

I said, “Don’t talk about it.”

In five days we saw all the good movies. I tried to take him to a strange eel bar I’d heard of, owned by a Japanese poet, but I got lost and couldn’t find it, and so I pretended it was my intent to show him the inaugural tower. 

***

On the third day in the city, after we agreed to marry, when Edward was going to meet my mother, we began to drink. 

“I don’t want to go to the hotel bar,” I said. “It’s depressing. It’s the afternoon. There are other places. We should take a taxi to Rub A Dub. Tonight is reggae.”

It was raining.

“I want to buy you a nice bottle of wine,” Edward said. “I can’t do that here. Maybe we could try the hotel.”

“My mother will be expecting us soon. We have already had a bottle, in four glasses.” 

After finishing a bottle of nice wine, it was time to go. I wrote a text message to my mother that said, “We have had wine.”

“There’s wine in the house,” my mother answered. “I bought it for the two of you. It’s in the cabinet under the trash bags.”

My mother had completely rearranged the furniture, and half-dismantled the shrine. She had vacuumed and cleaned. She is a very neat woman under ordinary circumstances, but now—down to the finest detail—the apartment was immaculate. I could see she had stood on the table, taken down the crystals of the chandelier, and dipped each one in solution. She was tossing the salad. The meal was arranged on the counter, along with as some smaller dishes. I introduced her to Edward.

I said, “My mother said she is honored to meet you.”

“Please tell her that the honor is mine. Tell her she is even more beautiful than her daughter.”

“My mother said you are flattering an old lady very well, and please continue. She also asked if you would like a glass of wine.”

“Please tell her yes, and thank you very much for going to all this unnecessary trouble.”

“My mother said houseguests are a great pleasure. She said she used to have them quite often, and she preferred, whenever it was possible, to do all of the cooking and service herself. She said that is traditional here, but she has heard not in America.” 

My mother went to the kitchen. She had bought a $40 thing to aerate the wine. It came in a glossy box that showed American models drinking wine. 

“Wine needs to breathe,” my mother said.

I brought Edward a glass and he drank it. Then he said, “Bring me more wine.”

He drank a little, and then he said, “Eddie Murphy was so brilliant in his prime. He’s just brilliant. He’s a brilliant comedian.”

I told my mother what Edward had said. She said, “It’s true.”

“They don’t have them like this now—just ask your daughter. She would know.”

His tone made his meaning clear, but my mother did not understand. She said, smiling, “What does he mean?” 

I said, “He means I slept with a lot of men when I was alone, and you and dad would not take my calls. He means I am a whore.”

My mother stood up and went to her room. She closed the door behind her. 

“See,” I said, “you’re very drunk and you embarrassed everyone. You made her angry.”

“I see that.”

“I think it would be best for us to go.” 

I called a car. While we waited for it, I put up the leftovers from dinner and cleaned the plates and bowls. My mother had already cleaned the kitchen, so there was very little to do. When I was done, I said, “What are you thinking?” 

“I am trying to decide if I will go back to the country.”

“Oh.”

“You would send my things in the morning.”

“Yes.”

“Now you’re making it worse.”

I looked out the window.

“You embarrassed me,” he said.

“You called me a whore.”

“You’ve had sex with hundreds of guys.”

“Not hundreds. Something like 30. Many women have.”

“Maybe they have the sense to lie.”

I got up and went to lie on my bed. All the pillows as well as the duvet were gone; my mother must have borrowed them. I put a towel under my head. Half an hour later Edward came in and lay beside me and said, “What are you doing?”

We held each other like children. I said, “You smell like Chex Mix.” It was only 9 PM. At one o’clock, my eyes opened. I nudged Edward and said, “Let’s go back to the hotel.”

“What?”

“Let’s go back.”

But he turned over. He had drunk a lot, and so I went back to sleep. 

***

“Are you going to come out and practice with me and Patience, or are you going to stay in your room with that ma-a-an?”

It was a little after seven, and Edward and I were in the missionary position, because we thought it would be more quiet.

I said, “I think I’m going to stay.”

“OK,” my mother said. Her tone was clear.

Edward rolled to the side and we stared at each other.

“She knew,” I said.

“How?”

“The sound of my voice.”

“No, she didn’t.”

Edward cleared his throat.

“What do you want to do?” I said. “What if we get dressed and go and have coffee?”

We went down to the bay. We sat on a park bench facing the ocean. He said he understood my definition of desire. He used the names of philosophers I didn’t recognize, and he made a definition that was not mine. It was analogous, or a part—but not mine. 

He started insulting me. I made the kind of remarks he had made to me. He said, “I left my first wife because I couldn’t make her happy. The woman I left her for was not special in any particular way; I loved her because I made her so happy. My psychology is much simpler than yours: I want to be loved. If I am not, then—” he made a gesture of tossing away garbage with one hand. 

I said, “I am going to go back up and read.”

“OK. I think I will sit here a while.”

I didn’t move. He got up. He sat on the ground and stretched out stomach up on the grass, making a pillow out of his shoes.

“You are hurting my feelings,” I said. “I understood everything you said, and I feel nauseated. In case you didn’t know.”

“Then you feel like I do.”

I said, “Let’s go walking.”

We walked a ways. A baby seagull stood beside a bench. We tried to see how close he would let us come. The seagull was nervous and felt our gaze immediately. He looked at us like predators. Then—almost like a human—he tried to look away, as though convincing himself he was being paranoid. We took another step forward and waited. The seagull did not move. We took another step. The bird eyed us again. He fluffed his feathers. We waited. He made a motion, considering flight, then stayed. We waited, waited, took a step, and he flew away.

Edward said, “Why do you think people get married?”

“Different reasons.”

***

Edward sneaked drinks all day. We did not end up going back to the hotel. By nighttime, he was loose on his feet and moving strangely. He insisted on carrying my purse. It fell off his shoulder and it dragged, caught under a chair, and nearly tipped him over. 

“Let me carry it,” I said.

“No,” he put the purse back on his shoulder. The purse slipped again, caught on a chair, and was dragged along the floor, out the door, along the sidewalk to the corner, where he went out into the street and waved for a cab.

In the cab, he played some racist music on his phone. I asked him to please turn it off. He played the song to its end, singing along, and scolding me for my rude choice to play such racist music. 

I said, “You think I am 36 years old and unmarried because I accept any man who comes along? You think I don’t know how to be alone?”

“You just proved it,” he said. “You just proved it, because when you said that it hurt my feelings.”

“Hm.”

“You are desperate for a man and would take the first one to come along. You don’t love me, you just agreed to marry me because you want a baby. You know that I am fertile.”

I lay down across his lap. It was after midnight. I was afraid to be alone with Edward. I was very angry. I asked him again to be quiet, and he said, “I’m perfectly within my rights to play music.” I sat up and directed the cab driver back to my mother’s building. Edward—hearing from my tone and gesture—said, “Just look for the one that looks like a motel that has been taken over by homeless people.”

***

My mother was asleep. I made Edward hot milk. When he was out cold, I noticed his phone. I looked at the screen. He was in touch with a woman named Sandra Williams. She had written to him earlier that day: “I dreamed you married a psychiatrist who was 45 years old.” 

I wrote to her, “That is funny. I wonder why you were dreaming that! :D”

I waited, but I guess she was asleep. I wrote, “I guess u r passed out, or having sex with your little dog.”

“Next time he cums suffocate him like autoerotic asphyxiation and grind the dog-dick meat into momos. :D”

A number, with no name, had written, “This is crazy, just so you know.”

I wrote, “Who is this?”

“Are you kidding me?”

“No.”

“Are you OK?”

“Yes. :D”

“It’s the person you’ve been engaged to for a year!!”

“What’s crazy about that?” I wrote.

“Call me when you can talk.”

“Is it crazy that I love you?”

“Why do you say those things?”

I went to the bathroom. I found the small box of potassium-permanganate crystals. I woke Edward up and said, “Electrolytes.”

“Huh?” He was sobering in his sleep. He wanted to be held. He reached up to take me into his arms.

I said, “Electrolytes, for a hangover. Tastes terrible, but makes you feel great the next day.”

“Mm.”

“Only thing is you have to swallow it all. This much,” I showed him the handful. 

I said, “Put them in your mouth, and before you can taste it, swallow them with this,” I handed him a jug of water.

He did as I asked. In the morning, he was dead. You will want to know how I went on after. My black ghosts were helpful and happy. I think it was harder for Edward’s ghosts. For a little while, before news of his death reached America, I had a good time, toying with them on his phone.

More fiction on VICE:

Gaudifingers

The Number

The Poet

A Few Impressions: The Parallel Structure in 'Strangers on a Train'

$
0
0



Image by Courtney Nicholas

One of the strategies that Patricia Highsmith employs in her first novel, Strangers on a Train, is to bounce the narrative between two characters. As the title suggests, these two strangers, Guy and Bruno, meet on a train at the beginning of the book and discuss killing people in each other’s lives in order to duck suspicions based on motives. Guy doesn’t take Bruno’s suggestion seriously, but after Bruno kills Guy’s wife, Bruno pressures Guy to murder his father. The structure of the book allows Highsmith to jump from one character to another and put them in completely different parts of the country, but because of their relationship and the vacillation between the two storylines, they feel as if they are very close to each other. It is almost a split screen effect, where they are living their separate lives distinct from each other, but the parallel structure brings them close together. It feels as if they’re in the same frame.

The linear form of the book prevents the stories from being played at the exact same time as a split screen might in a film (although split screens are rarely used this way in movies). But the two threads are woven in such a way that causes the reader to experience the stories as if they were happening simultaneously, at least that is the understanding conveyed. This technique causes the reader to go through one thread at a time, injecting a force of energy into the narrative. When each section is taken up again, it is resumed in the midst of the most crucial moments for that character. The back-and-forth transitions trim the fat and streamline the storytelling.

The book, which was published in 1950 and adapted into a film by Alfred Hitchcock the following year, begins with Guy’s perspective. Guy is the moral and stable character. It retains his point of view in the opening section in order to establish that Bruno is a madman. Highsmith writes about sociopaths often (the Ripley novels all follow the acts of a murderous psychopath), but she is able to keep readers engaged because these characters either have sympathetic human desires. In the case of Tom Ripley, he wants to be on the inside, to be liked (less so in the book than in the movie), and not to be lower class. In Strangers on a Train, we are able to endure Bruno because he is mediated through Guy, or in the very least we aren’t forced to stay with him for too long before we are shifted back to a Guy’s perspective. The filtering lens of Guy’s point of view in the beginning highlights how crazy Bruno is. And because we are in close proximity to Guy at the beginning, it causes us to align ourselves with him. Guy is the protagonist, but Highsmith often cuts away to Bruno to show what he’s up to behind Guy’s back. When she does this, we are not really aligned with Bruno even though we have been brought much closer to his thoughts and actions. We aren’t seeing him through another character’s perspective, but we still retain our allegiance to Guy.

Guy is the sane one (relatively) in the book. So when we follow Bruno as he starts on his self-motivated mission to kill Guy’s wife, we are still seeing him from Guy’s  standpoint. It is an ironic perspective because the close third-person relationship with Guy has been defied. Guy isn’t in these scenes and would have no way of knowing the subtleties of what happened during Bruno’s pursuit and execution of murder. But because Guy has been established as the protagonist, we see Bruno as an evil and distant agent acting against Guy. We in no way connect or feel sympathy with Bruno because he acts in such an extreme way, and his reasons for killing Guy’s wife are so crazy and are bound up in his desires to solve his own problems. He wants his father dead because his father controls his money and because he is cruel. So, Bruno’s emotional connection to his violent act against Guy’s wife is rooted in his own desire to have his father offed and a subtle attraction to Guy. Because the motive for his actions are so distant from the murder of Guys’ wife, and because his desire for murder doesn’t fit the wrongs he feels his father has inflicted, we have no sympathy for Bruno. But we are engaged with his sections, not because of an emotional connection, but because his actions will have such a big affect on our hero, Guy.

If we stayed with either of the characters for too long and didn’t switch between the two, the book might get bogged down in shoe leather. But because it alternates between them (favoring Guy) it can be implied that much of the shoe leather happened during the transitions. We don’t have to stay with Guy as he goes about his architecture career and plans his next marriage and then experience the murder of his estranged wife through his limited perspective. We are made privy to Bruno’s actions in close third person proximity, and thus have more knowledge than Guy. And because the reader is given that privileged ironic perspective, much time can be saved watching Guy figure out what happened. The story is propelled forward because it doesn’t need to time showing how Guy is caught up to speed about Bruno’s involvement with his wife’s death. Ultimately, the book is telling a story for the audience. It is told through segments that would take much longer in real life, but here, because the reader is aware of everything, the same rules don’t apply and things can be truncated and sped up. The sections compliment one another and allow the pace to be maintained because we don’t have to wait for the characters to figure things out. We get to see what happens on both sides at once.

Follow James on Twitter: @JamesFrancoTV

Previously - 'American Psycho': Ten Years Later/Twenty Years Later

More film stuff from VICE:

North Korean Film Madness

I Was an Accidental Nigerian Film Star

Behind the Debauchery

Italica: The VICE Guide to the Venice Biennale - Part 1

$
0
0

Every two years since 1895, Venice has hosted the most important contemporary art exhibition in the world. Over a period of six months, the Biennale welcomes over 375,000 visitors and raises millions of Euros in sponsorships. In 2013, 88 nations were represented.

But while everyone was talking about the art at the Biennale, we went to Venice few months before the official opening to meet artists, curators, and producers, and to understand how such a massive art event is made, as well as its impact on the city and its citizens.


Yaz and Yasmin Birth Control Pills May Have Killed 23 Canadians

$
0
0


Yasmin birth control pills. via.

I’ve been on birth control for about a decade now, and when I heard that 23 women are suspected to have died from using Yasmin and Yaz pills, I was shocked.

Health Canada documents revealed doctors and pharmacists believe most of the women suffered from blood clots caused by the use of the pills manufactured by Bayer Pharmaceuticals. One of the victims, B.C. resident Miranda Scott, had been using Yasmin for only five weeks before she collapsed and died.

The controversy around Yasmin and Yaz is nothing new, with Bayer having already paid over $1 billion in lawsuit settlements in the U.S. In 2011, Health Canada also issued a warning saying that the risks of developing blood clots were 1.5 to 3 times higher with Yasmin and Yaz than with other birth control pills.

Now, Ontario lawyer Matthew Baer has decided to represent hundreds of Ontario women in a class-action lawsuit again Bayer pharmaceuticals, alleging that Yasmin and Yaz have increased risks of harmful side-effects.

I called up Matthew to talk about the side effects of Yaz and Yazmin, how potentially harmful drugs make it onto the Canadian market, and why they’re still getting prescribed to young women across the country.

VICE: How did you get involved with the case?
Matthew:
After a whole bunch of people called saying that they’ve been injured by Yasmin and Yaz, we looked into it further and saw that there were real issues in the science and we started a case.

What are the main problems caused by Yaz and Yasmin?
The issue with Yasmin and Yaz, is that because they contain a chemical called drospirenone, there’s been increased risks for these side effects. The warning, until recently, didn’t make mention of any of those increased risks. Now, everybody knows that drospirenonecauses these side effects.

How did Bayer not find out about the risks beforehand? Don’t they do tests?
They would’ve known that it would cause problems, but they wouldn’t have known it was at a greater rate than the other ones. Often times you don’t find out until the drug is on the market and is distributed to a broader population. They still deny that it’s at a greater rate.

With all this evidence of problems, why are doctors still prescribing it?
Some doctors have changed their prescribing habits, some haven’t. They have to go by what information is out there and Bayer is continuing to say that there is no increased risk. I think they have a hard time trying to figure out who to believe. There’s a lot of studies saying there’s increased risks, but other than the media putting that information out there, I don’t know how people are going to find out about it.

Is there any possibility that Yasmin and Yaz could be banned by Health Canada?
It’s possible, but I don’t think so. They haven’t shown any indication of wanting to do that. Health Canada just did a safety review and they put out a warning that the risks [of blood clots] are 1.5 to 3 times higher than with other ones.

Who’s benefiting from having Yasmin and Yaz on the market?
There’s a lot of competition out there for the birth control market. The more each of the Bayer company can sell their product, the better for them.

What are you trying to accomplish with the class-action lawsuit?
There’s two main things that we are trying to accomplish.  One, we are trying to get compensation for those who have been injured. Second, just as important if not more, we want to make sure that there’s a proper warning so that women and their doctors know the true risks and can make an informed decision whether they want to use this product or a different one.

For a different look at the problems within the pharmaceutical industry that cause epidemics like this to occur, I called up Dr. Elliot Jacobson from the Montreal Centre for Integrative Medicine. We chatted about the bigger problems within the health community that can lead to such massive complications.

VICE: How can this happen? How can something like this result in 23 deaths and other major problems?
Elliot:
The pharmaceutical companies do testings on small amounts of people. When you’re only testing on 100-200 people, if you’re looking for rare complications, you’re not going to find many. But then, you get 600,000 people and even if 0.01 per cent of those people have side effects, well that’s still 60 people, a significant number.

What’s the process behind drug approval?
New drugs have to go through different trials. In terms of oral contraceptives, newer contraceptives get approved based on studies of older oral contraceptives, even if they don't have the same type of progestin in it. Health Canada bases a lot of its decisions on studies that are generally done through the FDA. There was an interesting article that I read, specifically on Yasmin and those 4th generation contraceptive, that when they got approved, that those people [FDA advisors] had ties to the drug companies. It’s a really murky industry.

Yeah, apparently last year it was discovered that 4 of the 26 FDA drug approval advisors had financial links to Bayer. Is there a way to stop things like this from happening?

There’s no easy way, I don’t think. There have been rules put in place. In the past, drug companies were allowed to do a lot of things they’re not allowed to do now: give gifts and trips to doctors who are in charge of prescribing the drugs. But that kind of stuff has now been made illegal. When you go to a conference now, people have to disclose whether they receive an honorarium from a drug company. A lot of it is trying to teach medical students and doctors how to appraise the studies that they’re reading and how to decide how to make that decision of whether or not they feel that this is unbiased information. It’s pretty insidious and it’s not always clear-cut, but I think that this relationship eventually has to change if you really want to get big pharma out of the medical field. It’s going to take generations and I think it will also take public pressure.

Do you think the government should somehow get involved to protect the public?
The government recognizes that a lot of medication has the potential to do harm. You know you’re taking a chance with any drug that has side effects. Same thing goes for birth control, you’re taking a medication for a purpose, and ideally the person that is prescribing that medication to you should be warning you about the possible risks and side effects. The government, rightly or wrongly, has decided to say that they give people warnings that these are the possible risks and that people have to make those decisions for themselves.

Would doctors who know about these side effects still prescribe Yasmin and Yaz?
They tend to downplay the negative side effects. Most doctors hopefully are paying attention to what’s going on. And certainly negative news like this generally will get most people to say “I’m gonna stay away from this for a while, until I can find more about it.”

How do you explain that Yasmin and Yaz are still on the market?
I think it has to do with the process of how a drug gets on the market and how a drug gets pulled. The government has to prove without a doubt that the risks outweigh the possible benefits. If they pull a drug off the market and the drug companies decide that they did it without enough evidence, they can sue the government.

Do you think a possible class-action lawsuit would have an impact?
I think it depends whether or not the lawsuit is fought or if they just settle. I think Health Canada needs to listen to the public, but they also need to look at the facts.

Who benefits from having a potentially harmful drug on the market?
The question is: are there people benefiting from that drug? Are the majority of people benefitting without having any side effects? There are other things on the market that would do the job, but they all have a certain risk. This is one example of a much bigger issue.

What’s the bigger issue?
In my eyes, the bigger issue is the relationship between the pharmaceutical industry and health care. The government spends tons of money in funding drugs. We are spending billions of healthcare dollars to fund pharmaceutical companies that are marketing drugs, marketing a product. There are always new drugs coming out on the market because the old drugs come off patent, become generic, and are no longer profitable. A lot of these drugs are not better and sometimes more dangerous than the drugs that they replace. They’re way more profitable. More profit for the drug companies means higher costs for the government. We are talking about public dollars. Where should the money be going? We are not putting money into prevention and talking to people about diet, exercise and stress. We are putting money into treating people. We don’t spend much money at all promoting health. I think that’s the bigger question.

 

Follow Stephanie on Twitter: @smvoyer


Previously:

Diluted Chemotherapy Medication Is Killing Canadian Cancer Patients

Uncovering the "Truth" Among the Conspiracy Theorists at the 2013 Bilderberg Fringe Festival

$
0
0

Every year, the Bilderberg Group—a collection of some of the world's most powerful people—gets together to discuss how to keep on being powerful. Now, considering that the past couple weeks haven't been great ones for democracy (shouts to Turkey and the NSA!), I don't blame you if the prospect of powerful government officials holding a closed-door meeting with the financial elite gets your goat a little. Especially since while the big swinging dicks gathered in Watford, England, last weekend, unemployment in the UK continued to rise, cities in Turkey kept on burning, and the war in Syria remained the stuff of nightmares.

While you might look at these worldwide messes and see a lot of basic human weakness and error, conspiracy theorists read the news, see the word Bilderberg, and immediately start connecting the dots: the puppet masters are poisoning the water supply, they're enslaving your mind—bad events aren't the result of human weakness or error at all, but a malicious plan being orchestrated against humans by a New World Order of aliens from space. You can argue that with a guestlist that includes David Cameron, IMF chief Christine Lagarde (one of 14 women among 134 delegates), David Petraeus, and the heads of BP, Goldman Sachs and Shell, the Bilderberg Group should make its high-level discussions open to the public. Unfortunately, the legitimate demand for allowing media inside the conference gets discredited by the swarms of conspiracy theorists who show up at the event each year to stand outside the gate and scream stuff about secret occult societies.

Sure enough, when the Bilderbergers arrived at the five-star Grove hotel in Watford, they were joined by the biggest crowd of conspiracists to date. In fact, the protesters had decided to create an official event and so the inaugural Bilderberg Fringe Festival was born, complete with a campsite, makeshift press tent, security, and the biggest names in the conspiracy world, including David Icke and Alex Jones. So what's the latest in secret truths dreamt up by the powerful to fuck us? I went down to the Grove to test the (fluoride-saturated) waters.



When I arrived, the police had put a one-in, one-out policy in place. "The event has already exceeded capacity," they shouted. "We intended to have 1,000 people there; there are now 2,000. Please keep off the grass."

"Keep off the grass? Is that what we're paying our taxes for?" one guy shouted, to whoops and cheers from the crowd. I waited patiently for my turn to get closer to the fringe festival, along with a bunch of totally legit media organisations, like InfoWars, WeAreChange, and Truthjuice. Everyone seemed nervous and the air smelled of Cannabis Cup-winning weed. I wondered whether these two phenomena might be connected in some way. 


Indie Meds, who "put the pieces together" himself.

After watching journalists who figured it wasn't worth the wait to get inside peel off all around me, I finally got through. Alex Jones, the keynote speaker, hadn't begun his speech yet, so I started making friends.

"What’s your name?" I asked a guy in a brown robe.

"Indie Meds. That’s my enlightened name since I started to wake up."

"When did you wake up?"

"I started to wake up about a year ago, when I had a stroke on the left side of my brain. Afterwards, my aware side woke up and I started to notice that the news was a load of rubbish. I started doing my own research into Egyptian pyramids, the Mayans, sacred geometry, the whole package—and aliens. They all sort of came together in a package and I put the pieces together myself."

"What ties all those things together?"

"The message is the same—back to the Mayans, back to the Egyptians and back to the Atlantians even before that: you are God; you are one."


At the back of this photo, past the security, is the Grove, where the Bilderberg Group was meeting.

"What does this have to do with Bilderberg?"

"Bilderberg’s just part of the power game," Indie Meds told me. "All the wars, all the media, all the politics, all the religions. I’m sure they’re tied in with the Vatican, too. Once you start doing research, you find you can link everything together, and once you’ve linked it together it changes your outlook on life."

"OK. What’s the costume for?"

"Because I like dressing up as a Jedi."

After speaking to Indie Meds, I was still confused. What did it mean to be "awake"? Do I need to have a stroke in order to wake up? And how did sacred geometry have anything to do with a load of powerful people who meet once a year without any cameras present? I asked some more people for help.


Philis (left) and Jud Charlton.

Maybe Jud Charlton and his ventriloquist dummy, Philis, could help me wake up.

“The idea with Ventriloquism Against Conspiracy (VAC) is that we come together," Jud said.

"If I came on my own, it’d be no good," chuckled Phillis.

"Fair enough," I replied. "What's the conspiracy?"

“It's all about: let’s get the information out. Let’s get all the stuff that they’re doing out.”


Many of the "awake" people seemed to spend a lot of time sleeping.

"What are they doing?"

“Well, that’s the issue, isn’t it?"

I stared blankly at him for a few seconds. "Yes. Wait—what's the issue again?"

Before I could ask any more questions, a wave of hollers and people shouting the Star Wars "Imperial March" song told me that Alex Jones had taken to the podium. The main event was about to begin.

 
Alex Jones before his admiring audience.

I'm sure you know who Alex Jones is. If you're not, he can best be explained as kind of like a WWE wrestler who adopts the persona of an extremely paranoid person every time he enters the ring. He seems to have mastered the debating technique of overwhelming you with such a torrent of falsehoods that you couldn't possibly address them all in real time.

"If you think hundreds of raped children and necrophilia is anything, that again is only the surface," he began, gently feeling his way into the swing of things.


There was a lot of weird electrode shit going on.

"They might kill me for getting up here and telling you this, but they have been putting out cancer viruses—that’s why there are hundreds of new bizarre cancers that never existed," Jones continued. "That’s why, 30 years ago—I've talked to medical doctors—doctors would fly across the country to see a child with cancer. Now I can walk out my front door and see children with cancer playing in the playground any time I go there, with their chemotherapy roach poison injectors hooked up to them!"

The crowd cheered.

"These cops. Every one of these cops. Within six years, 40 percent of them will have cancer."

The crowd laughed and cheered. Haha! Cancer.


A little girl breaks through the security line, presumably to join the Illuminati.

"Seriously. By 2030, it'll be more like 70 percent, so these cops will remember when they're burying their young child of cancer and they'll say, 'Oh, this cancer never existed 20 years ago, but all the kids are getting it. Now, let's not discuss why it’s happening, let’s discuss donating money to find the cure.' It's like if Jack the Ripper was stabbing people and we looked for a way to heal them instead of finding Jack the Ripper!"

In case you didn't understand that, which is excusable because it makes literally no sense, what Jones is essentially advocating is, "Instead of giving money to cancer research to find out where new cancers come from and how to treat them, let's stop that and start accusing businessmen and politicians of inventing new, impossibly secretive ways to mutate our genes." It's unclear what exactly the Bilderbergers are getting out of giving everyone cancer.

He then led the crowd in a chant of, “We know you are killers!” Presumably this was aimed towards the Grove Hotel, a good 650 yards away.

Towards the end of the speech, a lone provocateur jumped up and began accusing Jones of being part of the New World Order himself, infuriating the loyal crowd, who yelled, “Police! Arrest him!” The level of irony in the air was suffocating me. I couldn't help but imagine the provocateur preaching to his own devoted legion of bedraggled conspiracy theorists: The Bilderberg Fringe Festival Fringe Festival.

At the BFFFF, you can be sure there will be yet another provocateur who will interrupt the first one’s speech with passionate cries for the truth (the real truth). Hundreds of years from now, when everything is exposed to history, it will come to surface that that guy—the conspiracy theorist who dared to doubt the conspiracy theorists who in turn doubted the mainstream conspiracy theorists like Jones, who dared to doubt the Bilderberg New World Order—was right.


Trevor, a.k.a. Noisy Parrot.

Despite being buried beneath an avalanche of new information, I still didn't really come away from Jones's speech with any proper understanding of what was going on. So I asked some people if they could dumb it down for me.

"What do you think the main point of Alex’s speech was?" I asked Trevor, who goes by the name Noisy Parrot.

"Trying to enlighten us to what’s going on behind the scenes."

"What is going on behind the scenes?"

"Well, it’s the Bilderberg meeting."

I sighed. "Why do you have elf ears on?"

"Oh, they’re actually fairy ears. I roll with a group of fairies."


Janet (left) and Valerie.

I turned to two of those fairies, Janet and Valerie, to ask, "What do you guys think the main point of Alex’s speech was?"

"Just to spread awareness, I think," said Janet. "To see so many like-minded people come together, it makes me think that there is a shift happening."

"Yeah," Valerie agreed.

"A shift in what?" I asked. "Please can you explain to me what I'm supposed to be aware of?"

"So many people I know are finding things so incredibly different in the past few years. I think people are starting to wake up," said Janet, before prancing away with Valerie. I'm guessing they were off in search of better vibes and people who weren't asking them questions about why they were asking questions.

But I had every right to be frustrated. I'd come here to figure out what was going on inside Bilderberg—or, at least, what these people thought was going on inside Bilderberg—and no one could give me a straight answer. It was around this time that I began to notice a worrying number of children playing around the "spiritual healing zone" that had apparently been set up to counteract whatever dark ceremonies were going on at Bilderberg. I couldn't help but wonder how many of these kids were being ushered into a life of paranoia and strange looks every time they tried to strike up conversations about what "really matters" during history classes.

But maybe I was just being cynical. Maybe they regularly contribute much-lauded op-eds to InfoWars and were here of their own accord? Maybe, with their naive, uncomplicated take on the event, they could help me to finally wake up?

I asked a little girl what she thought about the Bilderberg Conference.

"Ummm. Very fun!" she said, to my surprise. Very fun? Did she have a part to play in the New World Order, too? Was this all some kind of game to her?

"What do you think is going on over in that hotel?" I probed.

"I’m not sure," she said. I wasn't convinced.

"Is it where the New World Order meets to discuss eugenics programs?"

"Yeah!"

I got out of there as fast as I could before she injected cancer into my blood.


This lady's shirt reads, "I went to Bilderberg 2013 and all I got was this lousy New World Order."

By now, I'd met lots of very opinionated people who didn't seem to want to disclose any opinions other than the fact that the Bilderbergers were the guys behind cancer. But I didn't quite feel awake yet. Now, I've been to enough of these type of events to know that you can always find hot girls at the hula hoop circle, and I thought that maybe the hot girls could help wake me up.


Francesca.

Francesca had a killer smile. If auras are real, she definitely had one, and I could totally feel its energy. I think she could feel mine, too.

"What brings you here today?" I asked.

"I’ve come here to spread as much unconditional love as I can. To everyone. And I think it’s working—I can feel it."

"Me too, I think it’s working. What do you think was the main point of Alex’s speech?"


Fringe Festival security guards escort someone away.

"They’re just making people aware, which is great. I love the fact that they’re here doing the right thing and speaking the truth."

"What are they making people aware of, specifically?"

"Of what exactly is going on in the world. We’re not listening to the media and all that. This is actual, y'know, important stuff."

I was a little upset that Francesca didn't have any answers for me, either, until she told me that she loved me and hugged me goodbye.  


Bryony.

"What brings you here today?" I asked a girl named Bryony.

"People, everyone, connecting and information," she replied.

"What information, specifically?"

"Uh, about the… people in there. What are they called?"

"Bilderberg?"

"The Bilderberg, yes. We shall not surrender to these people who are trying to control us and oppress us. And poison us."

"How are they poisoning us?"

"They’re poisoning us by putting fluoride in the water and genetically modifying nature."

"So does everyone in there support water fluoridation?"

"Like, here’s the thing—I came here with an open mind. I know there are people in there who are trying to do the right thing. I came here to connect with people and to love."



I had expected conspiracy theorists to jump me from every angle while they tried to explain the "truth," but the people at the Bilderberg Fringe Festival I spoke to got flustered and couldn't really tell me what they believed, at least not in a way that I could understand. The only thing everyone seemed to agree on was that Bilderberg is somehow controlling/killing us through water fluoridation. I can't help but thnk that if that was the case, they wouldn't really need to meet for more than five minutes to discuss how to do that. ("Let's put some more fluoride in the water supply!")

It's no wonder that in times of economic hardship people want someone to blame, but if the hippies and shock jocks at the BFF can't channel their anger into something useful, it discredits everyone else who's genuinely fighting for change. We all know that when you take drugs everything seems connected in some giant cosmic conspiracy, but the solutions to the world's problems aren't as simple as trying to expose a secret cabal of lizard people intent on ruling the world. Solving the world's problems takes a lot more hard work and dedication than that, and less scapegoating of non-existent entities.

Follow Matt on Twitter: @Matt_A_Shea

More on conspiracy theorists:

Conspiracy Theorists Are Dangerous Enemies To Make

America's Not-So-Secret Paranoid Underbelly

The Frenzied Conspiracy Theories of Jeff Boss

Tao Lin's iPhone Photos of Taipei: Taipei Metro

$
0
0

For the past couple of months, in celebration of last week's release of Tao Lin's latest novel, Taipei, we have been featuring a weekly selection of photos taken by the author during his recent trip to Taipei, Taiwan. While there, he took thousands of pictures with his iPhone, pictures which he has divided into albums titled things like "Taipei fashion," "Taipei carbs," "Taipei babies," and "Taipei signs," among others. In the final installment, Tao takes us inside Taipei's extensive subway system.

Taipei is out now from Vintage and you can buy it here. To read an excerpt from the novel that we published a while back, click here.


"Evolution of the Taipei Metro, 1987-2015" (via)

Previously - Taipei Public Art

Follow Tao on Twitter @tao_lin

What Is it Like To Be Tear-Gassed in Istanbul?

$
0
0


Photos by Devan Wells.

So I feel kind of bad. Last month, before anything went down, I came back from Istanbul all full of good news: “It’s great! Totally interesting! Cute little breakfast places!” Life in the shallow end, I guess. Fun stuff. Naïve stuff.

You may remember this particular bout of exuberance from my “Death to the LCBO” article, in which I gloried in the relative liberalism of Istanbul’s liquor laws, in comparison to those in Canada, and generally went on a tear about the place.

Like a lot of my bouts of exuberance, this one proved ill-timed—and not just for me.

While I was in the Turkish capital doing things like eating thinly-sliced eel and making little comments about what it tasted like, I was also spreading the word. In particular, I was exhorting my friend, L.A.-based photographer and blogger Devan Wells, to check the place out.

“It’s great!” I said. “You need a week at least—ten days probably.”

“Try the eel!”

So he went. And as soon as he arrived on May 31st, it all changed. The liberal liquor laws reversed themselves. There were riot police on the streets of Nisantasi, and he got tear-gassed seven times.

There are an enormous number of excellent reporters covering the ins-and-outs of the situation in Turkey, with shaky cameras right in the heart of the conflict, trying to figure out what’s going to happen; what this means; what the Erdogan government is going to do. But this isn’t that. For that, check out Tim Pool’s extraordinary live stream right here on VICE or “Istanbul Rising” the VICE documentary hosted by Milene Larsson.

To learn about what it actually feels like to get tear-gassed however, read on.

VICE: So what the fuck happened?
Devan Wells
: I had an early morning flight from Tbilisi, which meant that I boarded without any sort of update or beforehand information about the protests. I had no clue that there were ongoing protests until later on that day, when I learned the hard way.

When did you become aware that they were using tear gas?
I walked up the hill from Cihangir to try and change my Georgian Lari at one of the exchange booths along Taksim Square. As I approached the square, I felt a strange, queasy sensation. Shortly after, I inexplicably began crying. Like, pouring tears. Initially, I felt as if I was the victim of an elaborate street crime. However, as I looked around, seeing all of these panicking people, I realized that we had all been gassed. By then, I still hadn’t seen any riot police or law enforcement, so I figured that the gas emanated from a sewer pipe or whatever. At that point, I would have never guessed that protesters and police were having full-on, Tahrir Square-style battles.

What does it smell like? Taste like? Does it have a physical presence?
You don’t notice the smell as much as this distinct, stinging pain. Before swelling up with tears, I would always smell a foul, rancid-smelling odor. It smelled like a spent firework canister. It burned right through the typical Istanbul fragrances: gasoline, kebab stands, the sea, throngs of chain-smoking Turks. Tear gas is light and airy, but it’s also contagious. If you rub your eyes, you get it on your hands, spreading and prolonging the effect. It’s a nightmare.

Tell us about when you got gassed.
In total, I was gassed seven times. Twice outside of my apartment in Cihangir, three times in the (unavoidable) vicinity of Taksim Square, and twice in Sisli—a well-off neighborhood far from the initial unrest.

The worst incidents, by far, were the two times I was gassed after (literally) stepping outside of my apartment. Though I had heard helicopters and clashes going on through the evening, and had been woken up twice by pepper spray wafting into my apartment, it seemed for a moment that things were dying down. I decided to walk downhill to Karakoy to see if the main tram line was running, since I had planned to pick my girlfriend up from the airport that afternoon.

I figured that whatever was still going on, was uphill at Taksim. I was wrong.

As soon as I heard the door close behind me, I was greeted by a huge, drawn-out battle between young, hip-looking students—many wearing surgical gas masks and live-tweeting on their iPhones—and riot police equipped with tear gas, pepper spray, and pressurized water cannons. Before I could make it down the hill, the police fired several tear gas rounds in our direction. Moments later, dizzy and covered in tears, I stumbled onto the cobblestones.

After a few moments, maybe in response to the spectacle of a lost, stumbling foreigner, a few protesters appeared. These guys produced a crumpled-up water bottle full of a water-and-Novocaine solution. Due to their kindness, I was able to fend off the worst of the gas’ effects.

I then bolted towards the nearest pharmacy, where I bought the kind of gas mask preferred by coroners, Palestinians, and people wielding dust-blowers. Though I would be gassed one more time before the day would end, the mask saved me from the worst of it.

What does it feel like to have this stuff in your lungs?
The name is spot-on. You begin to cry—and cry a lot—soon after initial contact.

During the process, you feel as if your throat and lungs are burning. It felt like how I imagine it would feel to have my throat and lungs doused with acid. Also, your nose is running, with snot and tears mixing together to form this especially foul-tasting product. Once your face dries, you have to scrape dried-up tears from your cheeks and the corners of your eyes. You are temporarily blinded, which makes you panic and feel like you have to stand still. You feel like, if you’re exposed to it a few more times, maybe you could go blind forever. None of it is any fun.

What do you think about the fact that the Turkish police are using this stuff?
Even though Los Angeles has had its share of disorder, I had always considered riot police as a “last line of defense”: defending the City Hall, police stations, the airport, and key locations of commerce and trade. Stuff like that. I had never seen them actively engaging protesters, at least not violently. I had never seen them turned against their own people, charging down streets in armored vehicles that wouldn’t seem out of place in Afghanistan, or randomly firing tear gas into pedestrian-heavy areas; hosing crowds of non-violent protesters with pressurized water cannons.

And that is not to mention the people who have been arrested or run into hiding for tweet, or groups created on Facebook. That is something altogether more sinister.

 

For breaking updates on the situation in Istanbul, check out Tim Pool’s Live Stream on Vice.com.

HTC Downtown Sound: Eating Burgers and Riding a Ferry with Cold Warps

$
0
0

It's a bittersweet thing to say that this is the very last video of our Downtown Sound series, co-presented by our good friends over at HTC Canada. We went all around the country, ate a whole bunch of food, saw a whole bunch of bands, and did a whole lot of partying. Now, for the final chapter we went to hang out with Cold Warps. These classy gentlemen took us on a ferry ride and showed us why they love Ace Burger Co.

Enjoy!

Viewing all 38002 articles
Browse latest View live




Latest Images