Quantcast
Channel: VICE CA
Viewing all 38002 articles
Browse latest View live

The Serial 'Dine-and-Dash Dater' Is Back, Again

$
0
0

Los Angeles singles, look out— the infamous "dine-and-dash dater" is still on the hungry hunt.

In his latest alleged food heist, scumbag scammer Paul Gonzales reportedly returned to one of his favorite dining spots, ordered multiple expensive dishes, then dipped before the bill. During Thursday's episode of Desus & Mero , the VICELAND hosts roasted Gonzales and brainstormed ways for local restaurants to deal with his antics.

You can watch the latest episode of DESUS & MERO for free, online, right now. New episodes Monday to Thursday at 11PM on VICELAND.COM.

To stay up-to-date on all things VICELAND Canada, sign up for our newsletter.

This article originally appeared on VICE US.


The First People to See 'Solo' Say It's Actually Awesome

$
0
0

It's been hard to know exactly what to think about Disney's upcoming stand-alone Star Wars film, Solo. For every tiny bit of Donald Glover brilliance that might make you think the movie could be solid, there's a massive onslaught of weird, bad, and wholly bizarre news about the film's production to prove otherwise. Will it suck or rule? Can Alden Ehrenreich actually pull off a passable approximation of Harrison Ford? Is Ron Howard just going to narrate the whole thing like an episode of Arrested Development?

We're still a few weeks away from finding out for ourselves when the film hits theaters, but on Thursday, the first audience sat down to watch the movie at its premiere in Los Angeles. And the reactions are, uh, wait—they're actually really good!

It sounds like Alden Ehrenreich's secret Han lessons with Harrison Ford paid off, too.

Not everyone who saw the movie was totally sold on it. Some felt like it got off to a rough start—though things apparently fall into place once the main story gets rolling.

Well, shit. If Solo is as good as this early buzz makes it seem, then maybe a Lando movie about Donald Glover hanging out with Lobot and dicking around Cloud City will actually become a reality after all. Get on it, Disney. Until then, Solo is set to hit theaters on May 25.

Sign up for our newsletter to get the best of VICE delivered to your inbox daily.

Follow VICE on Twitter.

This article originally appeared on VICE US.

Pauly D Got Invited to the Party, and He's Never Leaving

$
0
0

The day after my senior prom, I arrived in Seaside Heights to see a car plowed through the lobby of a motel where my friend, who I'd given a ride, had a room booked. My class had come to drink after the dance, as well as sever relationships we would abandon anyway, when some of us left for college in a month. We'd come from my Central New Jersey suburb to Exit 82, 70 miles down the Parkway in standstill traffic, amid blaring horns, electronic music, and arms flailing from open windows. I idled in the parking lot, as we debated whether or not he wanted to stay in this crumbling structure. There was a man outside, presumably the manager, talking to guests, and we watched people going in and out of their rooms. It was safe enough, we rationalized, and, at the time, this beach town was known for its general atmosphere of lawlessness. He decided to risk it. Twenty minutes later, he would get thrown out—for dealing pot with his door wide open—but this anecdote became one of those I always told about the Jersey Shore, when someone asked if the so-often-hyped debauchery was real. This was in the early summer of 2009, the same month eight “guidos” first came here for MTV and changed reality TV forever.

“I remember that,” Paul DelVecchio, known throughout the world as simply Pauly D, says, laughing, when I tell him the entire tale of vehicular carnage. “Was the guy drunk?”

“I don’t know,” I say. “We never asked anyone.”

He hadn’t either, he says, and now, nine years later, DJ Pauly D and I are in Viacom’s headquarters in Times Square on a Wednesday afternoon, reminiscing about all the worst things we’ve witnessed down the shore. Most of the worst things we’ve witnessed involve fighting: someone getting knocked out on the street, someone getting knocked out at the bar, someone getting knocked out on the boardwalk. In the room where we’re talking, there’s a full dinner set up at the end of the table for some reason, as if an English king had just been here eating a feast, and Pauly catches me glancing at it in the middle of our conversation.

“I was taking pictures,” he explains, as if that explained it.

“For Instagram?” I ask.

“Nah,” he says. “For fun.”

We suddenly share a kinship, it feels. This, after all, is the power of the shore—the intoxicated brotherhood you have with strangers; the emotional, and sometimes violent, ups-and-downs; the shared, sloppy, almost mythical past. The place is an orgy of contradictions—goofy and obnoxious, terrifying and joyous, loud and serene. It is a never-ending bash, and though Pauly D may have left the Garden State for the moment, he certainly hasn’t left the party. It’s followed him—and he’s staying, clearly, for as long as he can. In his own words: “Yeah, buddy.”

In fact, he seems to keep getting bestowed with more and more party favors. He is, objectively speaking, the most successful of his tanned brethren. By far. According to Cosmopolitan, he is currently worth $20 million, $16 million more than the second-richest housemate, Snooki; in a 2012 profile, Forbes cited him as making $11 million that year alone, placing him, then, number 7 on its “top-earning DJs list.” He has DJ residencies all year long and all across the country, in Las Vegas, Chicago, and Atlantic City. He wears gold chains I’m not certain I could bench press. His mansion, outside Sin City (“away from the madness,” he clarifies), is Cribs-level in its ostentatiousness. He owns a tanning bed and high-end cars with personalized plates, and, at my request, quantifies a couple of these possessions.

“I have, like, 20 motorcycles,” he says. “Some of them are so nice, I don’t want to ride them.” He has one, designed by Orange County Choppers, next to his fireplace.

Pauly’s evolved into a caricature of himself, and he happily revels in it. He tends to speak quickly and in catch phrases—“I was born a guido”—and he sounds equally shocked and grateful for how his life has turned out. His origins, as the Pauly D we all know, are biblical in their simplicity and miraculous in their unwarranted level of outside intervention: A former used car salesman for almost ten years, he was DJing local Providence clubs at night for $100 a pop and studying to become a fireman during the day (“I could have been a firefighting DJ,” he says, cracking himself up), when he got a MySpace message from a production company out of nowhere. They informed him that he had the right “look” for a pilot they were going to shoot. They came by, shadowed him for a day—gym, tan, laundry, DJing—and months later, he received a call to go to Seaside, having no clear idea what was happening. A native of Rhode Island, he had never even been to the Jersey Shore until shooting the initial season. He’s learned, however, to relish being in the spotlight—even if, he says, TV wasn’t ever something he felt worth pursuing, had cameras not literally shown up at his doorstep.

“It was eerie, when I first saw myself on TV,” he says. “It was [in] a commercial, and I was doing my hair. My TV was on, while I was doing my hair. So I was watching myself do my hair, as I was doing my hair. It was like The Twilight Zone.”

Now, of course, he’s used to it, and after half a decade, the series has returned. The premiere of its newest iteration, Jersey Shore: Family Vacation, has brought in almost 3 million viewers an episode, and even if it’s not the ratings bonanza of the original—at its peak that was attracting 8 million viewers per episode, to the chagrin of Chris Christie, Dominos, and national Italian American organizations—it’s still a win for MTV. (And, really, who gives a shit about the old governor’s opinion of the beach?) The second season of Family Vacation was renewed before the first episode of the reboot even aired, and although its destination is currently unknown, Pauly says it'll have more of a documentary feel, with longer segments about all of their outside lives.

"I want it to be in Vegas," he says.

This time around, the network has reunited almost all of the cast, now as (nearly) fully formed adults in Miami: Both Nicole LaValle and Jennifer Farley, “Snooki” and “JWoww” in common parlance, have tied the knot with men they met on the show and had children; Vinny Guadagnino has moved out of his mom’s, even if she lives a convenient-enough distance away to pick up and drop off his clothes; Deena Cortese got married and lost her father; Mike Sorrentino, a.k.a. “The Situation,” is soberly awaiting sentencing for tax fraud; and Ronnie Ortiz-Magro became a father shortly after shooting, though not to Sammi Giancola’s kid. (It also appears he’s single again.) As they all repeatedly say: In the end, they’ve changed, and they haven’t changed. (Pauly’s now a dad.) The only one who’s missing is Sammi “Sweetheart,” Ronnie’s former seven-year-long flame, who declined to fly to South Beach, saying in a statement that she’s “currently extremely happy in every aspect of [her] life and want[s] to avoid potentially toxic situations.” (Pauly did, in a running gag throughout the season, replace her with a sex doll that, he insists, “weighs as much as an actual human being.”)

“I think she might regret not doing it,” Pauly says, when I ask. “This, it’s just a fraction of your life.” Fans, he believes, could create their own narrative for her absence—and, he continues, “I would live in a house with all my exes.”

It’s not necessarily difficult to understand why Sammi wouldn’t want to be under the same roof as Ronnie—if your memory’s hazy, just watch him belligerently redecorate their bedroom—but it’s also not hard to acknowledge Pauly’s line of reasoning: They were given an unheard of opportunity to promote themselves, and now, after only five years off the reality circuit (not counting the numerous spinoffs), it's knocking once more.

This logic, I come to realize, is the epitome of Pauly D: He’s business-minded, transparently aware of how lucky he got. His dreams, quite literally, slid into his DMs, propelling him from a local New England DJ to a frequent guest on Ellen. He hasn’t forgotten it, and no one even questions his rise any longer. He’s Kardashian-esque, famous in the most modern of ways: famous because he’s famous.

I wonder, however, who he ultimately appeals to.

“Ninety-eight percent female” he says, laughing, before citing the actual analytics. “Seventy-three percent, though, according to Instagram—I always tell the fellas, they got to come.”

Two days later, he refreshes me on this exact point in front of a live audience. I’ve been invited to observe him in action. It’s 2 AM on Saturday, when Pauly D ushers me onstage during his performance at Lavo, a club in Midtown Manhattan. I’m sitting at a table with Pauly’s friends and agents. They have “table service,” which I discover is a euphemism for having to mix cranberry juice with overpriced vodka for yourself. Meanwhile, Pauly’s drinking Dom Perignon out of glow-in-the-dark bottle and pulling a truck horn. He’s playing the hits, all the ones you’d expect, one after the other, on a laptop that has multiple stickers of his face. When it’s my turn in the lineup of people Pauly has to say “hello” to in the midst of his set, he gestures toward the crowd.

“See,” he says. “All girls.”

“Are they the only ones who come?” I respond. “Or are they the only ones you let inside?”

He smiles, and shrugs.

I finally stare out at the dance floor. I hadn’t really been paying much attention. There are a lot of girls. It looks like a Sweet 16 party being held for a host of 20-somethings. At one point, Pauly plays Lil John’s “Get Low.”

“That’s the wall,” he says, pointing to a wall. “And that’s the window.” He points to another wall. (This is a key demonstration of his improvisational skills, as there are no windows.) He then proceeds to shout out more people than I’ve ever met in my entire life—among them, his label boss 50 Cent, fellow cast member Vinny, and the owner of the nightclub. He hopes, wherever Avicii is, that he’s resting in peace.

When I leave around 3 in the morning, DJ Pauly D is still spinning. Men and women are still waving their arms to the repeated sounds of a truck horn. Bodies block my path. I weave my way around them, settling into a lane. It reminds me of a congested highway, going down the shore.

Eventually, I find my exit.

Sign up for our newsletter to get the best of VICE delivered to your inbox daily.

Follow Alex Norcia on Twitter.

Follow Caroline Tompkins on Instagram.

Scroll down to see more photos of Pauly D performing at Lavo.

This article originally appeared on VICE US.

Moms, Ranked

$
0
0

Moms—what is there is to say? They let us live rent-free inside of their bodies for nine months, then (usually) let us live rent-free inside their homes for the next 18 or so years. For better or worse, they make us who we are. To celebrate them, we've ranked some of history's most notable moms, from least good to best. Enjoy!

Norma Bates

Not the best mom, as evidenced by the premise of Psycho, but nevertheless, a famous and important mommy.

Your mom

You know, the lady who's so fat she uses the equator as a belt? Perhaps you know her better as the woman who's so stupid she brought a spoon to the Superbowl? Just kidding, she's great, tell her I said I had a great time last night.

Allison Janney in I, Tonya

Another mom who SPOILER ALERT wasn't the best.

Stifler's mom

From Wikipedia: "The concept of the MILF predates the term itself, as exemplified by Mrs. Robinson in the movie The Graduate (1967). The term itself was first documented in Internet newsgroups during the 1990s. It was popularized by the film American Pie (1999), where John Cho's character (simply credited as 'MILF Guy No. 2') used the term to refer to Jennifer Coolidge's character Jeanine Stifler. [citation needed]."

Stacy's mom

We actually don't know much about Stacy's mom, aside from the fact that she's "got it goin' on." Still, that's great. Congrats, mother of Stacy!

Allison Janney in The West Wing

In the last episode of the show, there is a flash-forward which reveals that SPOILER ALERT Allison Janney's iconic West Wing character, CJ Cregg, becomes a mom. Motherhood is great, so I hear. Good for you CJ!

Amy Poehler in Mean Girls

She's not a regular mom.

Amy Poehler in real life

via Wikimedia Commons

She's also not a regular mom! She's a famous actress who is also a mom.

Allison Janney in Juno

I don't remember the plot of this movie very well, but the girl doesn't get an abortion, and we get to see sweet Allison play yet another mommy.

Mary, Mother of Jesus

Another famous girl who did not get an abortion.

Meryl Streep in Sophie's Choice

What would you do if you had to kill one of your kids to save the other one? That's the question SPOILER ALERT Mommy Streep grapples with in Sophie's Choice. Sometimes motherhood is hard!

Allison Janney in Mom

Allison Janney, the best mom in television and film, doesn't have any children of her own. But on screen, she is the Mom.

Leslie Horn

If you don't know who Leslie Horn is I feel bad for you. She's the managing editor of Noisey, and she's a very nice lady. Moreover, she's currently carrying a little baby in her tummy. (Can you imagine how heavy that'd get?) The baby hasn't even been born yet and she's killin' it.

Michelle Obama

Remember the years 2009–2017? Better times when this lady was mommy to our nation. Now Sasha and Malia are the only ones who get mom'd by her, and I'm jealous.

Chrissy Teigen

Do I even need to explain this one? The most likable person on the internet is also a mom. What more could you monsters want?

Mother Earth

via Wikimedia Commons

Also known as Mrs. Earth and Earth-Mommy, she is dying and we must save her.

Fiona the Ogre

Shrek is love, Shrek is life, but the woman who helps him achieve his ultimate Shrek-ness continues to be underappreciated.

Amber Rose

Every one of Amber Rose's Instagram videos of her son, Sebastian, deserves an Oscar.

Linda Belcher of Bob's Burgers

via FOX

Encouraging, happy, loving. What more could you want in a mom? To not be an animated fictional character? Picky, picky...

Serena Williams

The best tennis player in the world—and a pretty great mommy to Alexis Olympia Ohanian Jr.— Serena deserves credit for not giving her daughter a weird celebrity name and also for the cutest Instagram account she made for her baby. God bless this woman.

Kris Jenner

Not only is Kris Jenner the mother of Kourtney, Kim, Khloe, Kendall, and Kylie, but she is also the mother of Rob. She's changed the American cultural landscape forever, and we owe her everything.

Ruth Peyser, my mom

My mom's the best! Sorry haters, that statement is logically irrefutable.

Sign up for our newsletter to get the best of VICE delivered to your inbox daily.

Follow Eve Peyser on Twitter and Instagram.

This article originally appeared on VICE US.

The 15 Best YouTube Videos to Watch When You're Stoned

$
0
0

Potential sources of existential dread lurk around every corner on the internet. One moment you could be dancing with cyber goths, the next getting screamed at, the next narrowly avoiding being hit by a train. You could probably use some help navigating. Especially if you're high. Previously, we've compiled the best movies and tv shows on Netflix to watch when you're stoned—and even what to watch when you're tripping balls. No Netflix? No problem: Here’s a list of the best videos on YouTube to watch when you’re stoned.

Alantutorial

No one really knew who “alantutorial” was when the first video, how to leak on a piece of paper, appeared in 2011. It’s still not completely clear whether its underground success was even intentional; what we do know is that artist Alan Resnick’s 65-video creepypasta-meets- series centers around an obsessive young man, played by Resnick, who may or may not have been kidnapped and forced to make tutorials. Although alantutorial’s transmissions concluded in 2014, as with Resnick’s other works (Unedited Footage of a Bear, This House Has People In It) people are still looking for answers.

AlmazanKitchen

One of the strangest phenomenons of the internet age involves a networked “return to nature” that’s facilitated by technology. Basically for every 1,000 people hunched over an overheating laptop, one or two go into the woods with camera gear and advocate that we “turn back to main ingredients that have been neglected, such as fire, different biosystems of microbial cultures, [and] ancient techniques of food preparation.” Basically this is that as a cooking channel with ASMR triggers.

Chicken Connoisseur

You could say this YouTube review show for London’s fried chicken spots has a host who is also a debonair sneaker enthusiast, or you could say “The Chicken Connoisseur is a food critic for mandem who care to know what the finest chicken restaurants in London are and where to find them. And a crep fiend too." It would mean the same thing, basically. A hybrid food, travel, style show couched in a sociological study, it’s everything you want.

Colin Furze

Every era needs its own science guy; the YouTube generation’s Bill Nye is a British former plumber in Etnies and an Office Space short sleeve with the power to build a fucking hoverbike.

David Firth

I was in middle school when I first discovered Salad Fingers during the same pre-problematic early internet video show-and-tell that also included The Super Bowl is Gay, Rejected Cartoons, and Fredryk Phox. British animator, artist, and musician David Firth is an unsung hero of grisly, nihilistic art-comedy in a world where David Lynch is all enlightened now or something. See also: Burnt Face Man, The News Hasn’t Happened Yet, The World Within a Sock.

EVERYTHING IS TERRIBLE!

The internet’s closest approximation to a clip show, the EVERYTHINGlSTERRIBLE channel collects lost and forgotten children’s tv, PSAs, and employee training videos, all edited and decontextualized in a way that definitively shows why we, not octopi, are the weirdest species.

The Existential Horror of Logan Paul

Critical theory, even if contradicts your #posigoals for 2018, is the only compass for navigating the post-ironic, post-meme landscape terrorized by Grusk and Lil Tay. Here, YouTuber Big Joel unpacks the meta-phenomenon that is Logan Paul in an elegant video essay that also serves as a masterclass in avoiding ad hominem attacks. If I could wish one vlog into existence, it would be Logan Paul’s reaction/reply to The Existential Horror of Logan Paul. My guess is it would be something like Jude Law’s breakdown in I Heart Huckabees.

Every Spongebob Time Cards

Nothing in SpongeBob Squarepants is anchored by any sense of reality whatsoever, so the consistently inconsistent appearances of the show's Jacques Cousteau-inspired narrator are a treat for fans whenever they occur. If you're really stoned, check out the moment at 4:45, where things get extra fourth-wall breaking.

La Blogothèque’s A Take Away Show

A throwback to the DIY days of DV cameras, French filmmaker Vincent Moon’s live performance series captures hipster music at its most adoring. Highlights include Beirut on the sidewalk, The Dø outdørs, and Grizzly Bear in a bathtub.

lofi hip hop radio - beats to relax/study to

Noisey Italy called this online radio phenomenon the “appropriate soundtrack for a paralyzed generation,” and I think they’re right: this 24/7 music station is tailor-made for people who have seen through Netflix’s illusion of choice and just want someone else to choose the songs.

Primitive Technology

Did you know that you can turn snail shells into a solid brick of lime using fire, water, and some clay pots? Queensland, Australia’s John Plant does. When the lights finally go out, he’ll be the guy to find.

Red Bull extreme sports videos

So what if Red Bull is mining subculture while floating corruption to sell an energy drink that increases some people’s risk of a heart attack? There’s nothing cooler to watch than a well-shot extreme sports video, and Red Bull is a wellspring of them.

SSION videos

So there’s this artist guy from Lewisport, Kentucky, Cody Critcheloe, whose queercore savior alter ego, SSION, is going to become the most-important thing in pop with the release of his new album, O, this Friday. On the internet, you can find work from Critcheloe dating back to the early 2000s that’s as good or better than most of the art and music coming out today. He’s also one of the most talented young directors around.

Vine compilations

A globalist Parent Teacher Association has to be responsible for the fact that the internet’s best short video platform isn’t coming back anytime soon, otherwise there’s no reason hyper-popular videos like RIP vine compilation, vines that cured my depression, and vines that cared for me when no one else did would be the ruins of a bygone era.

Will It Blend?

The answer is always yes. PS: Don’t breathe this!

Sign up for our newsletter to get the best of VICE delivered to your inbox daily.

Follow Emerson Rosenthal on Instagram.

This article originally appeared on VICE US.

These BC Liberal Politicians Attended an Anti-Abortion Rally

$
0
0

In the same week that Alberta’s United Conservative Party voted in favour of a motion that would make it more difficult for young people to access abortions, two BC Liberal politicians showed their support for anti-abortion causes on the steps of the Victoria legislature.

Former deputy premier and MLA for Langley East Rich Coleman attended a rainy “March for Life” rally on Thursday with Hope-Chilliwack MLA Laurie Throness.

“I’m pro-life because it’s a matter of faith and natural law, that life is sacred from conception until natural death,” Throness told a crowd of about 100 people. “I’m pro-life because there’s no more positive position, no more loving perspective than the pro-life perspective.”

Throness was followed by event organizer Alissa Golob, who somehow tried to position limits on abortion access as a feminist cause.

“Women in this country have been fed a lie for over a generation now,” she said. “We’ve been told that in order to be equal to men, we must somehow become more like men. And the only way to become more like men is through abortion. We’ve been told the only way to achieve true equality is to abort our children.”

One can be forgiven for thinking the abortion debate was settled in Canada back in the 1980s, when a landmark court case found a woman’s right to access safe and legal abortion is protected under the constitution. It seems Alberta politicians, who also walked out of a vote to increase the size of “safe zones” around abortion clinics on Wednesday, weren’t the only ones to miss this memo.

With Alberta’s Conservative leader and former pro-life campaigner Jason Kenney even declaring he won’t touch anti-abortion causes, it’s not clear what these two powerful men elected in one of Canada’s most progressive provinces were hoping to achieve. Earlier this year British Columbia became the latest province to cover the abortion pill at no cost.

Throness has a history of getting behind socially conservative causes. When the BC Liberal leadership race was announced last year, he released a list of 65 policy priorities that included a call for the full participation of “people of good conscience who may disagree with changing sexual mores and concepts of gender.”

Throness has attended rallies opposing more trans-inclusive teacher resources, and has thrown his support behind a school trustee who is the subject of two human rights tribunal complaints because of his anti-LGBTQ stance.

Follow Sarah on Twitter.

Sign up for the VICE Canada Newsletter to get the best of VICE Canada delivered to your inbox daily.

Kanye Wants to Chill with 'Rick and Morty' Creator Justin Roiland Because Nothing Makes Sense

$
0
0

Rick and Morty co-creator Justin Roiland has had a hell of a week. After months of uncertainty, Adult Swim finally ordered 70 new episodes of his show, and Roiland finally made his way out of Dan Harmon's shower. On Thursday, things got even wilder when "free thought" champion and Donald Trump admirer Kanye West tweeted that—more than Keeping up with the Kardashians—Rick and Morty is his favourite thing on TV.

Apparently psyched by the news, Roiland asked Kanye to hang out on Twitter—and now it looks like that's actually happening.

You can only imagine what kind of beautiful, dark, twisted gloopity glorp the two creators might come up with together. Animation has been part of Kanye's identity since the infamous Graduation listening party where he screened anime porn while playing his album for the first time. (His Takashi Murakami-directed music video for "Good Morning" is also a classic.) Roiland, on the other hand, shot into the Billboard Hot 100 for the first time last year with "Terryfold." Maybe it won't be Roiland's last hit, if West gives in to fan demand for a "Get Schwifty" sample on one of his next projects.

For their part, followers who stan for Kanye and Roiland didn't waste any time in guessing what they might get up to when they meet.

Other's weren't so psyched on the collaboration—whether they were liberal Rick and Morty fans who can't stand the rapper's ties to Trump, or Kanye stans who are afraid of running into Szechuan Sauce-crazed Redditors on the next tour.

Whether Roiland joins Kid Cudi, Pusha T, and Teyana Taylor on Kanye's long list of upcoming collaborators, or Kanye one-ups Logic's performance with an animated concert on Rick and Morty remains to be seen, but one thing's for sure: Shit's about to get weird.

Sign up for our newsletter to get the best of VICE delivered to your inbox daily.

Follow Beckett Mufson on Twitter and Instagram.

This article originally appeared on VICE US.

This Is What It's Like to Treat an Incel as a Sex Therapist

$
0
0

Jason is a 30-year-old who grew up in a big city in India but now lives in Gothenburg, Sweden. He gets lonely there, what with being a cultural outsider and living alone—something he has long hoped to fix by getting a girlfriend. He doesn't identify as "incel" per se, although he certainly meets the baseline qualification of being involuntarily celibate, which is how he found himself asking the braincels community for advice. Despite Reddit banning the main "incel" community in November for its violently misogynistic rhetoric, adherents have found new homes elsewhere on the site that effectively serve the same purpose: providing a sense of belonging for guys whose identity is constructed around the fact that they aren't sexually active.

Although Jason is reluctant to align himself—however tangentially—with a subculture that recently made headlines after a self-described member was charged with killing ten people in a Toronto van attack, he posts on braincels in between publishing personal ads for women to talk to on the phone. "I'm unsure if it's actually helping," Jason, who did not reveal his real name, told me via Reddit. "But at least there is a group which acknowledges that it is unlikely for some people to get into longterm relationships due to some traits, be it looks or personality or body language, which one may find very hard to change if at all possible and which may force one to question their identity."

When Jason asked braincels for advice on seeking therapy as an incel, however, the responses he received were, in a word, discouraging. Still, Jason told me he was determined to continue trying to understand social norms and gain some perspective on how people perceive and respond to his body language.

If he does, he might do well to link up with someone like Sam Louie—a psychotherapist near Seattle who helps people with relationship issues. While the idea of sex therapy often conjures up images of men compulsively seeking gratification a la Michael Fassbender in Shame, Louie also treats the opposite—those who aren't having sex at all. Typically, Louie said, these people don't say right off the bat that they want to work on getting laid, but it becomes obvious after a number of sessions that's what they're really after.

"A lot of young boys don't have a male role model telling them it's OK to be a virgin, there's nothing wrong with that," he told me. "There's not enough of a buffer between peers and society telling them that if they've graduated high school and are still a virgin, then they're really screwed up."

I called the marriage and family therapist (MFT) up to discuss a current patient of his, and what it's like to try to help a virgin in his early 30s learn to attract women while simultaneously dismantling the idea that having a sexual relationship is the end-all-be-all of human existence.

VICE: I'm interested in the process of validating some of your lonely patients' frustration but also helping them realize their lack of romantic success is at least partly their own fault. Can you walk me through what that looks like?
Sam Louie: I have one current client who comes to mind at this point. When he first came in, he mentioned really struggling with being in relationships. But then when this incel thing happened in Toronto, he started talking more about it. He said that was him a number of years ago when he was in college, that he had the same level of vitriol and hate. By the time I saw him, he had a lot of rigid, black-and-white thinking that a lot of women were a certain way. His own definition of masculinity, or hyper-masculinity as he described it, had been shaped because he had spent a lot of time in Reddit groups that had catered to the incel community. He realized it was toxic, but the mentality was difficult to break. A lot times he would blame not being white, not being blond, not being strong, not being tall. So that obviously put him, he thought, in an unwanted category.

Well, how do you help someone work through that when they're blaming these immutable characteristics, some of which actually do face prejudice?
I wish there was a one-size-fits-all solution, but for him a lot of it is asking what his strengths are, what he's good at, and what he values in himself. What does he feel competent in that he can lean on for some measure of feeling affirmed? One thing was that he had a girlfriend, but they were never sexual, which he blamed on his ethnicity because she ended up ditching him and dating a more stereotypical white guy. That made him feel more inadequate.

What made it difficult in that relationship was that he was often shamed for the things that he liked—video games, art, drawing manga. His girlfriend thought it was stupid and corny. Even in therapy, I asked him what he liked [and] he said it wasn't what most people like, and it took time for him to even trust me that I wouldn't ridicule or dismiss his interests.

How important is building that kind of trust and rapport?
Once he saw me he was already out of it and he was trying to put her out of his mind. Once I did inquire a little bit more, it came to seem like he wanted a relationship more than he actually liked the other person.

So what do you do in those situations? A pick-up artist, for instance, might encourage some more traditionally masculine activities, like going to the gym. Does a therapist do any of that, or just press finding a more suitable partner?
So he was starting to go to the gym, and I said it was fine if he was going to do it for his own health or benefit, but if he was going to do it to try and attract another woman, then it could continue the cycle of inadequacy. I think one major shift that he needed a little bit of changing was his wardrobe, body language, and hairstyle. In the beginning, he didn't even comb his hair. After a few months, I did say, "Have you ever considered that your presentation can affect that?"—in the most diplomatic way possible.

How did he react?
Finally, he was like, "OK, maybe I should care for myself." I said, "Hey listen, when I go out there and a woman just doesn't care for herself, like you, and doesn't brush her teeth, and doesn't comb her hair, everything is mismatched, and there isn't a clean appearance, I'm going to think that she doesn't care about herself. If she doesn't have enough self-respect to care about herself, that's going to be a very hard person for me to date, and what I want to ask about you, is your lack of self care a sign of lack of self-respect?" I used an example and said, "I have some friends who are married, and they look married. And I have some friends who are divorced and are trying to date, and I've had to tell them that they still look married." And finally he put two and two together and agreed.

That sounds like you're kind of toeing the line with what a PUA would say minus the misogyny. How much of your advice is practical, versus attempting to dismantle the ideology he had been steeping in on Reddit?
I mean, I just told him to buy a pair of jeans—he had only ever worn slacks. Jeans are important in this age. He should at least own one pair.

I think maybe a third at the most is just practical stuff, like coaching. He was also on dating apps and talking to three women for a few weeks, and I had to ask if he had asked any of them out yet. I told him that if he wanted to get somewhere he couldn't spend hours on end exchanging messages. The sooner you meet the better, so you can assess if you like them in real life. So he's working on that.

The other practical piece is body language. I had to explain that eye contact means a lot. But then as part of dismantling the ideology, he began to think the opposite of the incel ideology and that he didn't want to make a woman feel intimidated by eye contact. But it still comes up in terms of the black-and-white thinking. He'll say things about needing to be super buff, or that nobody likes Asian men according to statistics from Match.com, so no one will ever date him. That's a lot of generalizations—no one will ever date him?

Are the guys who come to see you for being involuntarily celibate overtly angry?
There's a lot of self-anger and self-rage about what they did wrong. It did externalize before because [the same patient] liked a girl he met online, and went to see her out of state, but then she got back together with an ex. Now there's a lot of hatred—not necessarily toward her, but toward the ex. Just a boiling over hatred. I have to say, "You've never met him. This is a reflection of her, not a reflection of you." So a lot of cognitive-behavioral therapy about how thoughts impact feelings. He also gets [upset] because virgin-shaming is very big online. But mainly, these people, if they're really entrenched in this ideology, like my patient was, need to get out of that toxic environment on their own before they can even think about getting help.

This interview has been lightly edited and condensed for clarity.

Follow Allie Conti on Twitter.

This article originally appeared on VICE US.


Meet the Fetishists Empowering Themselves with 'Kitten Play'

$
0
0

A community of feline fetishists has created its own paradise in the Colorado countryside. Founded by UK-born kitten Isabella Antoinette, Cat Girl Manor is a Victorian mansion turned oasis for women who practice kitten play, a BDSM subset that involves dressing up and role-playing as cats. Antoinette says men often link the Manor, also known as the Cat Chateau, to the Playboy Mansion, but she finds the comparison inaccurate.

"I say no, it's different," she told the crew in the debut episode of our new series, The VICE Guide to Sex. "Hugh Hefner created Playboy with the bunnies to sell a men's magazine for men. Whereas with the chateau, it was made by girls for girls, for our lifestyle." Half a dozen women who feel empowered by kitten play live in the chateau, which is decked with paintings of anthropomorphic cats, furry BDSM toys, and Victorian decór. Even more women congregate online at Antoinette's website, TheChateau.org, and attend glamorous events she organizes. Kittens are usually submissive to doms, who are referred to as "gents." Together, they've carved out a safe space to live out their fantasies.

Meet the self-described Persian house cats and feral kitties of the Cat Girl Manor in the behind-the-scenes photographs of The VICE Guide to Sex: Cat Chateau below.


Click here to watch the full video for The VICE Guide to Sex: Cat Chateau.

Sign up for our newsletter to get the best of VICE delivered to your inbox daily.

This article originally appeared on VICE US.

Netflix's 'Evil Genius' Explores a Case Straight Out of Your Nightmares

$
0
0

This article contains mild spoilers for Evil Genius: The True Story of America’s Most Diabolical Bank Heist.

August 28, 2003 was supposed to be just another summer’s day in Erie, Pennsylvania. This average American city, however, transformed into the set of a twisted horror movie the moment a middle-aged pizza delivery man walked into a bank with a homemade explosive locked around his neck.

The man was Brian Wells, whose name will forever be synonymous for what is known as one of the most heinous and chill-inducing robbery plots in recent history: a morbid scavenger hunt “gone wrong.” But he was only one of many characters who made this multiple murder case into something you think you'd only see in theaters.

One month after the deadly attempted robbery, Bill Rothstein, who lived near the radio tower where Brian Wells’s fate was sealed on one final delivery, made a call to the police that would forever change the life of Marjorie Diehl-Armstrong. Labeled everything from a femme fatale to a mentally ill convict to a victim of her own crime, Diehl-Armstrong died in prison in 2017. This is where the new docu-series, Evil Genius: The True Story of America’s Most Diabolical Bank Heist comes in to play.

Myriad podcasts, primetime specials, and even in-depth articles made the high-profile pizza bombing heist something true crime junkies know well. However, in the Duplass Brothers' newest Netflix Original—which follows their recent success Wild Wild Country—we see these victims and conspirators in a new light thanks to filmmaker Trey Borzillieri, who formed a journalistic relationship with the late Diehl-Armstrong that would be the foundation of this documentary, more than ten years in the making.

VICE talked to Borzillieri along with Evil Genius co-director Barbara Schroeder in the days leading to the release of their new docuseries, which is now on the service:

VICE: There are so many twists in this case that I assume it must have been insane to be so immersed in it from the near beginning.
Trey Borzillieri: Right? An interesting, unique thing about [Evil Genius] is that because someone like Marjorie can participate in it, we could go inside of the conspiracy, if you will, and hear firsthand on the deeper truths.
Barbara Schroeder: When Trey first came to me with all this information, I was like, “Wait a minute. This is a very layered case, but there’s also a dark love story behind it.” Then I was really interested. The mastermind might be this woman who had a string of dead lovers. It’s a one-of-a-kind case. That’s the best way to describe it.

It’s so interesting to see Marjorie in a way we never will again, because she’s passed on. What exactly was your relationship with her like, maybe in a way we didn’t see in the series?
Borzillieri: Well, she just was an endless energy. Because I reached out to her before she was publicly labelled a suspect in this case, I became a sounding board for her. To be honest, it was grueling because of everything she was. She was obviously a sociopath, intimidating because she had killed before. And she was a really good liar. So trying to ferret it out and capture truths from her was challenging. For many years I developed this relationship hoping that someday it would all be worthwhile.
Schroeder: The verbal abuse that Trey put up with and dealt with was astonishing. At one point, she said she would “sue his fucking balls off.” She was a handful, and he hung in there.

One thing that really stuck with me, Trey, was the creepy scene when you tried to talk to Bill Rothstein. Now knowing the information that’s come out and subsequent bone-chilling theories revolving around him, when you look back on that moment, what do you see?
Borzillieri:
It was scary. He had been deemed not a suspect at that point by the FBI, and so I had faith and thought that I would be approaching a man that was going to clear his conscience about being falsely accused. What I got was just the opposite. That experience wreaked of guilt for me. I felt something there. Looking back on it pretty quickly afterward I thought, Wow, that was a close call. Getting the courage to walk up to where the body [of James Roden] was placed and just the bizarre nature of him and the situation, it could have ended very tragically. I feel like I was definitely story plot in that moment, because I just had no business approaching him at that time.
Schroeder: But we’re glad you did!

This story is not only interesting to people who are into true crime, but also fans of horror movies. Even if not completely related, films like Saw III, 30 Minutes or Less, and even that Black Mirror episode “Shut Up and Dance” parallel this case. Even ones that are not about the case similarly include deadly scavenger hunts, not-so-innocent victims, criminal masterminds, major twists, femme fatales, and the demonization of mental illness. When you were making this docuseries, did you relate it to film and feel that same terror?
Borzillieri: Absolutely. I grew up on horror movies. They influenced me in odd ways. Being young in the 80s, it was everywhere. Stepping into this, I read that there was a remote television tower where Brian Wells would deliver that final delivery. It just reminded me so much of the movie Se7en. Then to read that there was a body right next to that dirt road in a freezer. That was like Fargo. They all come together in this. Believe it or not, they were filming Saw when this story broke. So it sort of preceded that. Saw was not a byproduct of this.

Really? I always thought the filmmakers read about the case and thought it was a good idea. That’s how much of a terrifying story this is. The minds behind the Saw franchise came up with something so similar. But that’s also why the Black Mirror came to mind, which is crazy to me because it seems no one associated it with the case.
Schroeder: I saw it and was like, “wait a minute.” I called my husband and said, “Watch this. This is like Evil Genius.”
Borzillieri: I mean, with 30 Minutes or Less, no one was imagining a black comedy coming out on this case. Marjorie was pissed off about it for sure. [Laughs] She was, she was. She was saying it had bad effects on her publicity. Negative publicity for her. But she loved attention, so I’m sure she was chuckling over it.

How have you seen cases like this effect pop culture?
This was very shocking. Obviously it was intended for being in the media. That was part of the whole scheme. I think that it has just grown from there. These bizarre cases, whether they be massacres or unusual crimes, are covered up every day now. But when this came out, the memory was that Brian Wells’s death was captured on video. When that happened, there was a viral email that was spread around that showed the explosion. You could go on dark web websites and watch it. This was sort of the beginning of these type of death viral videos. Then obviously what was to come was the rash of beheadings and all the videos that went along with that. It’s gruesome stuff, but it was the beginning of where we are now.

You used the footage in the documentary.
Schroeder: We did, but I hope you noticed we blurred the actual explosion at the end, and then we blurred quite a lot of the last shot too. Families could be watching this, who knows? We didn’t want to use it gratuitously. We only used it to reinforce how heinous it is that this poor guy was blown up. It was a public execution, and no one was ever charged with his murder.

Sign up for our newsletter to get the best of VICE delivered to your inbox daily.

Follow Sarah Bellman on Twitter.

This article originally appeared on VICE US.

Prosecutors Are Still Trying to Send Trump Inauguration Protesters to Prison

$
0
0

Prosecutor Jennifer Kerkhoff owns a singular distinction: She’s the only Assistant United States Attorney to have a punk album named for her—Now That's What I Call Kerkhophony V.1.

Kerkhoff earned that distinction from being the prosecutor in charge of the J20 trials—the series of proceedings that will decide the fate of dozens of demonstrators arrested during protests of Trump’s inauguration on January 20, 2017. Nearly 200 people were charged with felony riot and destruction of property, charges that carried up to 60 years of prison time—even though in many cases, there seemed to be no evidence that individual protesters had actually damaged any property. As The Nation put it last year, “merely being at the protest was a crime.”

In December, the first batch of defendants was acquitted, but 58 defendants remain charged and will face a judge and jury in at least nine more trials; jury selection for the next of these is scheduled to begin Monday.

The defendants’ supporters are concerned that each trial is a platform for the prosecution, in effect using the court to stack the odds against the later defendants.

“Theirs is the most nefarious narrative,” said Jude Ortiz, chair of the National Lawyers Guild’s Mass Defense Committee, which trained many of the legal observers who were in DC on January 20 to witness law enforcement’s engagement with the protesters. “In their press releases, all their filings and statements in court—the defendants were all in a conspiracy to riot and destroy property, everyone’s involved and equally responsible, and everything about political protest is criminal activity.”

Denver civil rights attorney Jason Flores-Williams was a legal observer at the demonstration, but was disqualified from representing arrested protesters because the court saw this as a conflict of interest. In his view the prosecution means to send an even more pernicious message, which is that protest of the sort that the defendants engaged in is prohibited full stop. “You can engage in the veneer of dissent,” said Flores-Williams, “or in the facade, but if you engage in actual dissent, and say no to business as usual, then we’re going to crush you and send a crushing message to others so they don’t follow your lead.”



Flores-Willians thinks the fact that the defendants are facing conspiracy charges is telling, and could have a chilling effect on speech. “The important aspect here is that they’re going after fundamental associative rights. They implant the idea in the minds of the citizenry that even to discuss dissent or even 'like' a dissenting comment on Facebook can lead to prosecution. When that happens, democracy dies.”

But unlike the first trial, where the government admitted that none of the defendants had personally destroyed property or planned to do so, some of these defendants have been specifically named as window-breakers at Starbucks and the Bank of America.

“These defendants are in a different posture,” explained Brett E. Cohen, defense attorney for one of the acquitted defendants from the first trial. “Their attorneys are going to have a different challenge. I don’t know if the government has enough to make the jump between what’s on the videos and the people who were kettled and arrested. But we know from talking to the jury, even though they didn’t buy the government’s arguments, they were impressed with the production; it was very well done.”

Kerkhoff’s office declined to comment for this article.

At the same time the J20 trial is going on, the DC branch of the ACLU is bringing a lawsuit on behalf of six plaintiffs, including two J20 defendants, that alleges police misconduct including “manual rectal jabbing” and other excessive force in the chaos of Inauguration Day. One plaintiff, a ten-year-old boy, was allegedly knocked down when a policeman charged without warning; the crowd, including the boy and his mother, also a plaintiff, was pepper-sprayed as they fled the melee.

In March, the government moved for dismissal of the suit, a motion the ACLU must answer in the next two weeks.

“They’ve thrown the kitchen sink at us and we’re responding as necessary,” Scott Michelman, lead counsel on the suit, told me. “We don’t do things lightly, and we’re prepared to defend our legal theory.”

When Kerkhoff dropped the charges against 129 people in January, a month after the first jury rejected her collective guilt argument, she announced that she would focus on charging people who had personally committed crimes.

But Michelman and others doubt all 58 of the remaining defendants were involved in property destruction. One of those defendants is Elizabeth Lagesse, who is also a plaintiff in the ACLU suit; her lawyers have requested charges be dropped against her. “In their motion they raised the possibility that she’s being put through the wringer of a criminal prosecution as retribution for being a plaintiff in our suit,” Michelman explained.

Months ago prosecutors offered her a plea deal to collapse her felonies into a single misdemeanor. Unwilling to plead guilty to something she did not do, she refused and is prepared to face trial on June 25 if her motion to dismiss is not granted.

Flores-Williams likens the trials to the witch hunts of the McCarthy show trials in the 1950s and the Chicago 8 trial in 1969, where the defendants were charged with conspiracy to cross state lines to incite a riot at the Democratic National Convention.

“Conspiracy charges are antithetical to the core values of the first amendment,” Flores-Williams said. “The judges should have said ‘no, we’re not going to allow you to prosecute citizens in a time when protest is critical to our country. Go back, do your work, bring these charges in a responsible way.’”

Sign up for our newsletter to get the best of VICE delivered to your inbox daily.

This article originally appeared on VICE US.

How to Join a Biker Gang

$
0
0

The following is an excerpt from The Secret Life of Bikers by Jerry Langton, available May 15.

After moving to a new town for construction work, Mitch went to a gym to work out. On his first visit, he was approached by a “large, tattooed guy”—it should be noted that Mitch is also a large, tattooed guy—who offered to spot for him. The two started working out together and, after about six weeks, the guy, Ben, invited him to a bar he hung out at.

Mitch was delighted to see a lineup of Harleys outside as he too liked riding. Inside, he was even more impressed. Ben and his friends never paid for any drinks and always seemed to be having a great time. They were all friendly to him, patting him on the back, shaking his hand, laughing at his jokes and making sure he always had a full beer.

“I didn’t even know they were Bandidos then,” he told me. He thought they were “just guys who liked to have a good time.” He enjoyed himself so much that he ended up returning to the bar week after week. He found out the guys were Bandidos, but it didn’t bother him. “I thought they were cool,” he said. “And I never saw them break any laws or anything—just little stuff, like anyone would do.”

Before long, there was talk of Mitch riding with the Bandidos. He went on a couple of runs with them, riding in the back. They teased him about his Kawasaki and said he’d have to trade it for a Harley if he ever wanted to get serious.

He admired them, and he didn’t see much difference between the way they lived and how he wanted to live. He was, however, “creeped out” by how much they knew about him—like his parents’ names and what school he went to.

It was only after weeks of partying and riding with the Bandidos that Ben told him he could become a hangaround, conditional on his changing his motorcycle. While that title meant that the club recognized him as an acceptable candidate for potential membership and that the individual members of the club would back him up in a fight, it also meant that the club owed him nothing else, that he was not a representative of the club and that he could not speak for, or even of, the club to others. It also meant that he was forbidden to associate with any other club without the Bandidos’ approval.

Mitch agreed and started shopping for a used Harley.

You can’t just apply to be a 1-percenter biker. The official statement from the Hells Angels is “If you have to ask, you probably will not understand the answer.” Though awkwardly worded, its meaning is clear—you can’t just join a biker club. And all the other big clubs say basically the same thing.

It’s an understatement to say that the clubs are extremely picky about who they accept for membership. The official word is that the clubs are looking for just the right kind of people without much more in the way of specifics, while law enforcement says that because such clubs are involved in so much illegal activity, they live in constant fear that sensitive information will be leaked and want only those candidates who won’t spill their secrets.

No successful 1-percenter club has ever accepted candidates who approached them for membership. But new bikers have to come from somewhere, of course, so clubs actively recruit men they think check all of their boxes.

Often, that means clubs will lean heavily on relatives and old friends, but they also reach out into the community for new recruits. Three criteria stand out in an ideal recruit: the ability to take care of himself in a fight, the ability to make himself, or the club, money and the ability to keep his mouth shut.

Typically, clubs will go to gyms, especially those that feature mixed martial arts, to find guys they know can fight. Similarly, they might look at bodybuilders, wrestlers, men recently discharged from the military, doormen and bouncers from nightclubs and strip joints, and men with careers in personal security and experience serving as bodyguards. Those are all guys who are usually valuable to have around in a scrap.

Jail can be a fertile recruiting ground, as imprisoned bikers frequently make connections and alliances behind bars. And it’s very easy to assess a man’s fighting ability, or his reputation as a fighter at least, in prison.

Clubs also prize guys who have successful businesses, especially if they deal in cash or provide a service considered valuable to the club. That means that clubs go out of their way to recruit tattoo artists, gun shop owners and employees, strip joint and nightclub owners, talent agents (especially those who handle strippers), importers and exporters, motorcycle mechanics and people who work with leather. Cash-intensive businesses, of course, provide an excellent way to launder money. And they’d never admit it, but the big clubs also target pimps, drug dealers, marijuana growers and meth cooks.

The best way to become a biker, I have been told repeatedly, is simply to hang out where bikers do and act like one. If you’re good at it and show an aptitude for the values they hold, they will eventually approach you. Several bikers have told me that the best way to become a 1-percenter is to put on a vest with a 1-percenter patch and fight anyone who tries to take it off you.

Of course, it’s also important that the candidate own and ride a motorcycle. The bikers themselves say that their clubs really are organizations dedicated to riding, while their critics contend that that’s a convenient fiction they maintain to prevent them from being busted up by anti-gangster laws. Either way, you can’t be a biker unless you own and operate a bike.

At least in theory. There have been many instances of that rule being fudged. When the Hells Angels created their Niagara Falls chapter, they had to teach several members—including president Gerald “Skinny” Ward—how to ride, and the Quebec Biker War was kicked off when the Hells Angels wrote a note to the leadership of the Rock Machine asking them to stop calling themselves a motorcycle club because (and they were right) only a few of them actually owned motorcycles. Even now, many overseas chapters of the big clubs infuriate domestic leadership by accepting members who ride small motorcycles, even scooters, if they even ride at all.

Although it varies from club to club and nation to nation, most 1-percenter organizations limit their members to Harley-Davidson or, at least, American-made motorcycles. That also includes Indian, a smaller-output manufacturer owned by Polaris Industries, and Victory, which was also owned by Polaris and was discontinued in 2017. That’s been a bit of a problem for many bikers, as all but the most jingoistic motorcycle enthusiasts will agree that all Japanese and some European bikes represent better quality, performance and, especially, value for dollar than Harleys. In 2017, Consumer Reports wrote that over a span of four years, the average failure rate for Harley-Davidson products was more than double that of Yamaha, Suzuki and Honda and nearly double that of Kawasaki. “It’s always been important for Hells Angels to ride American-made machines,” wrote Sonny Barger in his memoir. “In terms of pure workmanship, personally I don’t like Harleys. I ride them because I’m in the club, and that’s the image, but if I could, I would seriously consider riding a Honda ST1100 or a BMW. We really missed the boat not switching over to the Japanese models when they began building bigger bikes. I’ll usually say, fuck Harley-Davidson.” Barger later switched from a Harley-Davidson to a Victory for his primary ride.

In the case of heavily customized motorcycles, some clubs will specify that at least the engine has to have been manufactured in the US.

Some overseas chapters of the big clubs allow their members to ride Triumphs—British bikes that were popular with American bikers in the 1950s and early 1960s and were the type ridden by Marlon Brando in The Wild One—or BMWs.

Japanese and Korean bikes, despite their reputation for durability and performance, are frowned upon by 1-percenters around the world and derisively called “rice,” “rice burners” or “rice rockets.”

Most clubs have a minimum size limit for bikes, measured by their engine displacement. The Outlaws constitution says that they will take bikes with engines as small as 605 cubic centimeters, while Bandidos cut off at 750, the Warlocks at 883 and the Pagan’s at 900. These rules originated in the 1970s when the Harley-Davidson brand hit its lowest point.

The candidate also has to be male. You might see women in cut-off denim vests with patches riding Harleys, but they are not members of the major clubs.

In the 1970s, a few women tried to sue the Hells Angels for denying them membership, but they didn’t get far. Since the Hells Angels are a private club, receive no funding from any government and aren’t officially an employer, they can use any criteria they want to accept or deny members. Even if they had been legally compelled to accept women, Hells Angels leader Ralph “Sonny” Barger was quoted as saying, “We wouldn’t do it anyway.”

And the candidate, not surprisingly, has to be an adult. According to the Pagan’s Motorcycle Club constitution, candidates must be eighteen, while other big clubs specify they must be twenty-one. But those numbers are just the bare minimum and are not put to the test very often. Because clubs are looking for candidates they know they can trust and who can potentially help the club in a fight or, and this is increasingly important, financially, they aren’t looking for kids as members. Certainly, they wouldn’t want someone who is not old enough to drink legally. Serving alcohol to minors is exactly the kind of legal problem clubs want to avoid. Law enforcement can frequently build bigger cases out of small infractions, and evidence of underage drinking in a clubhouse or member’s home could easily lead to a search warrant.

Although not expressly worded in their constitutions, the major 1-percenter clubs do not admit openly gay men as members. There have been several cases of covertly gay men in these clubs—like Dany Kane and Aimé Simard, members of the Rockers support club and contract killers for two different Hells Angels members—whose orientation has come out after their arrest or death.

After a 1968 murder in the clubhouse of the Satan’s Angels— a Vancouver club that would later become Hells Angels—local police wiretapped their phone. One remark they heard—“We got a new butler”—caused them some alarm. After some investigation, police learned that the “butler” in question was a young man who had been kidnapped by members of the Satan’s Angels and sodomized and tortured for no reason other than they found it entertaining.

As the LGBT community has gained more widespread acceptance and has become more visible, bikers have distanced themselves from it. Most 1-percenters display animosity toward the LGBT community, and some have even taken to disrupting pride marches and other events.

Interestingly, before LGBT rights became a major cultural issue, bikers (and there are records of both Hells Angels and Outlaws doing this) used to have a habit of passionately tongue-kissing each other for “shock value” and to “express brotherhood.” In his 1965 book Hells Angels: A Strange and Terrible Saga, Hunter S. Thompson wrote that such kissing “is a guaranteed square-jolter, and the Angels are gleefully aware of the reaction it gets. The sight of a photographer invariably whips the Angels into a kissing frenzy.”

Some years later, things had changed. Chuck Zito wrote in his memoir that he had been part of a group that in 1985 had the authority to set up a chapter in Japan, but he called it off because he saw two men on a street corner holding hands. “In Japanese culture, we were told, that sort of display of affection is perfectly normal, acceptable behavior and is not seen as a reflection on one’s sexuality,” he wrote. “Well, that may be, but I have to tell you: there is no way that any Hells Angel is ever going to prance hand-in-hand with another guy. Call it homophobic; call it narrowminded, call it whatever the hell you want to call it. It simply is not going to happen. Case closed. End of story.”

And then there’s the race question, which is a huge deal in the biker community. Over the years, readers have told me that I’m wrong to say that there are no black members of the big 1-percenter clubs, even including the Hells Angels. But if there have been any, I have found no solid evidence of them, just rumors. There have been, however, several notable Americans and Canadians of African descent in the 1-percenter orbit, but never as members of big clubs.

Sometimes, existing clubs with black members will have to expel them when patching over to a bigger club. That happened in 1977 in Hamilton, Ontario. The dominant club at the time was Satan’s Choice, which had three black members, and it frequently referred to itself, tongue in cheek, as the Good-Looking Guys Club. One of the conditions of the patch-over to the Outlaws was that they get rid of those three guys. The expelled bikers started their own club, the Not-So-Good-Looking Guys Club, but it ended when they were convicted of disposing bodies for the local Cosa Nostra boss. Later incarnations of Satan’s Choice were all white, and they patched over to the Hells Angels.

On other occasions, black bikers are simply barred from being members, no matter how qualified. Haitian-born Greg “Picasso” Wooley beat guys up, allegedly killed people and sold drugs for the Montreal Hells Angels over the years and was a close friend of Maurice “Mom” Boucher—a Hells Angel sometimes referred to as Canada’s Pablo Escobar—but was never a Hells Angel himself. Barred from wearing the winged skull because of his skin color, Wooley instead wore the patch of the Rockers, a support club.

The reality is that the major 1-percenter clubs do not accept black members. In fact, the Hells Angels issued a bylaw in 1986 that simply states, “No n-----s in the club,” and the Outlaws constitution also puts it plainly: “All members must be white.” Undercover US Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms and Explosives (ATF) agent Jay Dobyns noted in his memoir many instances of racial bias by the Hells Angels, some as petty as members being greatly offended that the ringtone on his cell phone was a Nelly song.

Jerry Langton is one of Canada’s leading writers on organized crime and the author of several national bestsellers. The Secret Life of Bikers is available on May 15. It is published by HarperCollins.

Sign up for the VICE Canada Newsletter to get the best of VICE Canada delivered to your inbox daily.

Mads Mikkelsen Starved Himself to Exhaustion for His Latest Role

$
0
0

In his new survival movie, Arctic, Danish actor Mads Mikkelsen plays Overgård, an explorer stranded in the titular wilderness. He finds a glimmer of hope when a rescue helicopter crashes nearby. Though the pilot is dead, saving the life of the accident's lone survivor (Maria Thelma Smáradóttir) compels him to face the elements and rescue them both.

The first feature film from Brazilian YouTuber and music video director Joe Penna, which premiered last week at the Cannes Film Festival, Arctic is a standout for its commitment to naturalism and to braving the elements. Its grueling, 19-day production on location in Iceland was at turns the most "difficult" and "challenging" shoot the Hannibal, "Bitch Better Have My Money," and Rogue One: A Star Wars Story actor says he's ever done.

At the Cannes Film Festival, VICE sat down with Mikkelsen to discuss surviving the film, his preparation (or lack thereof), and why it's important to take roles on for yourself and no one else.

VICE: How did you get involved with the project? It’s such a strange film!
Mads Mikkelsen: It was actually thanks to Martha De Laurentiis, one of the producers on the show Hannibal. She was in this project, and she recommended that he [director Joe Penna] should maybe think about me. Then she called me and she said, “Do you have the script?” and it was down in the pile because I have a lot to read! So I pulled it out and I loved everything. I knew it was a survival film, but I was very much in love with the simplicity of the story: the difference between surviving and being alive, and not being alone in the world, not being able to give up and die because somebody is holding your hand. I thought that was very beautiful. Every genre film needs to have a strong story, and that story was really beautiful.

How did you feel about working with a first time director?
I felt good about it! It’s not the first time I’ve done that, I think I’ve done it [for] maybe half of my films!

Is it a conscious decision to work with first-time directors?
It’s not a completely conscious decision, but it turns out that we have something in common. I like it when people are radical, and they have no compromises. This is their first [film]—they’re like, “This is my shot! This what I’m gonna do!” You can find that in more seasoned directors as well, but you often find it in first-time directors. They’re just like, “Fuck the world, I know what I want!” you know? And I love that.

So when you choose projects, is it always just based on reading scripts?
Yep. I’ll never, NEVER do anything I haven’t read. And I’ll never do anything for which I haven’t met the director. I have to really love the story, and if there’s something I don’t understand, if the director and I disagree, but I think that she or he has a flame, I might say, “Well, I don’t agree, but it’s interesting, it’s cool!” So there has to be the combination of those two. And then thirdly comes my part, and then whoever [else] is in the film. But those are the two main things for me.

When you read the script for Arctic, you knew that the conditions were gonna be intense, right?
I had a hunch! But I didn’t really focus on it, so I realized what we were doing when we were there…

Didn't you prepare at all?
No, I didn’t prepare because the character didn’t prepare! He was just on his way home, and he crashed! And then, so did I! I didn’t prepare physically, but I prepared, obviously, story-wise. Joe and I went through everything. We were on the same page, and we might have agreed on my character’s backstory, but we didn’t want to show it.

It’s more about her backstory than his.
Yeah, but for him it is enormously important as well, and that indicates a little thing about him. But we didn’t want to go down that memory lane. I liked that we didn’t fall down that... I call it a trap. Other people love it, but I think if it was like, OK, he had a fight with his father and this long journey was all about learning how to love your father, no. No! This is about fucking being not-alone in the world! And I think that’s a bigger story.

Yeah, it’s just a guy who happened to fall.
Yeah! And with any luck, it could be you! So we can all go, “OK, I see you, I get it.”

Did you also pick that role because it was gonna be difficult?
No… And I say that a little too fast, because there is a tendency, when I look at a lot of my films! But that’s not what catches me. As I often say, if I wanted a challenge, I would just get naked and walk up Mount Everest, right? It turns that my films often are challenging, but it’s not what intrigues me... I think? Maybe it is, I don’t know! It’s funny—with limits, it’s interesting to see where they are! But I would never have done it if it was just that. It has to be a beautiful story first.

What was the hardest scene to shoot?
They were all very difficult in different ways, some were just physically hard. I kept losing weight, getting thinner and thinner, I had no energy at all, and I forgot to eat. I had to do extreme physical things that I would have had a hard time doing when I was fit! So I was drained [but] my emotions were like, right there. And for that reason, some of the scenes also became a little more emotional! I kind of broke down a few times, because the character would have done it. But we were still in control, I was still aware. It was just like, “OK, let’s use that!” You have to go with the tiredness. You have to go with the weather.

Doesn't physicality distract you from your acting? Or does it help?
It’s a mix… When it’s just difficult, then man is free. You don’t have to act it. It’s there, right? At the same time, we also still have to focus on what we’re acting in that sequence, but with this fatigue, it will come out a little different. The conditions were our biggest enemy but also our biggest friend.

You’ve done also some really big blockbusters. Do you find it hard, once you’ve done a really big film, to then do small films?
No, on the contrary. I miss out. I wanna go and do that! And then when I’ve done a few of those, I wanna go and do a flying kung-fu film in Hong Kong! So I find that it’s a lucky situation because you can drain yourself in both worlds, and what they have in common is that they have to be honest to what they do. There is a frame, there is a goal for what we wanna do, and you gotta be honest on that process. So I’m really comfortable in both places.

I always wonder, when actors work on franchises like The Avengers, if it stops them from doing anything else.
I guess it can. Maybe if you start in that and then there’s a tendency for other people not to see you as anything else… But then again, some actors who do that can get an enormous career from it, so… That’s a typical European question! Americans are not that worried, you know? I think that it’s also [the fact] that other people want to write us up into auteur films, or American acting films. They wanna put us in boxes. But very few actors belong in those boxes and I’m very, very grateful that I’ve been able to go back and forth. I don’t think I’ve lost any of my credibility here, or any of my… whatever they call it, there. Everything inspires each other.

It’s just I guess a bit scary sometimes when you see an actor getting into a project that’s like five films long.
You have to be brave sometimes and pick other things not for your career, but for yourself. Oh, it’s good for me to do a Lars von Trier film, or, I’m this American actor, it would be good to be loved in France as well. I mean, that’s also a thing, right? But that’s not the way to do it. You’ll do a Lars von Trier film because you love him—that’s the good reason. Not because it’s good for your career.

It’s like people who do Woody Allen movies just because they're by Woody Allen.
Yeah. But what if it’s a bad film? Don’t do it!

Sign up for our newsletter to get the best of VICE delivered to your inbox daily.

Follow Manuela Lazic on Twitter.

This article originally appeared on VICE US.

This White Comedian’s Rip-off of 'This Is America' Is a Pile of Garbage

$
0
0

It’s only been a week since Childish Gambino aka Donald Glover dropped the incredible music video for “This Is America” and already a white woman has attempted to steal his concept and piss all over it.

I say “attempted” because Canadian YouTube star Nicole Arbour’s “women’s edit” of "This Is America" is a failure in every possible way. I’m annoyed that I even had to watch all three minutes and 54 seconds of it in order to write this piece.

Backing up for a minute, the real version of “This Is America,” directed by Hiro Murai, is chock-full of symbolism and offers a searing commentary on racism, gun violence, police brutality, and society’s willingness to focus on viral videos while ignoring the pain and death evident all around us. It is a creative feat that requires several viewings (and thinkpieces) to unpack everything that’s going on.

Arbour’s video, which she posted to YouTube this weekend, is a fucking mess. It opens with her mumbling something like “We just wanna be pretty, pretty that’s the goal, we just wanna smile, get a mammy home” as a black woman nursing a baby in a chair gets dragged offscreen by two men.

I guess Arbour is attempting to address (white) women’s issues in the video—while totally oblivious to the fact that she is appropriating a black man’s work that specifically highlights the black American experience. But where Glover was clever and imaginative in his messaging, Arbour’s piece is embarrassingly literal. She holds an actual lightbulb over her head when she sings about having an idea. Her lyrics include, “This is America, got rape in my area, you got a drink, the roofies got into ya,” and this nonsensical stanza “Look how I’m spitting truth out, I’m so trendy, I wear Fendi, I’m so sexy, Imma get it, watch me move, these my titties, that’s my tool.”

When she rightfully got dragged on Twitter, Arbour responded by characterizing her video as an homage to Glover’s.

“His video hit me hard. Real hard. Best art I’ve seen in years. Finally felt it, and was hoping u can feel me now too,” she tweeted. She is clearly defensive about the criticism, as she also tweeted, “Trying to paint someone as racist for making a female positive/ empowerment video makes as much sense as betting on the Celtics.” (For the record, the Celtics are up 1-0 in their series against the Cavaliers).

Then again, we probably can’t expect much from someone who previously said she’s “sick of people mad at slavery” and has made videos fat shaming people in the name of “satire.”

I’m mortified for anyone associated with this project.

Follow Manisha Krishnan on Twitter.

Tomi Lahren Got Owned with a History Lesson About Her Immigrant Ancestors

$
0
0

Tomi Lahren has built her career, in no small part, by saying terrible shit about immigrants, from coining the term "rapeugees" to generalizing undocumented Americans as murderers. So perhaps it was inevitable that a genealogist would troll the conservative commentator with a look at her own origin—unearthing historical records suggesting Lahren's ancestors weren't exactly Mayflower demigods, as the Hill reported.

Over the weekend, the noted hip-hop villain popped up on Fox News to back up John Kelly's controversial claim that most undocumented immigrants coming into the US "don't integrate well" and "don't have skills."

"You don’t just come into this country with low skills, low education, not understanding the language, and come into our country because someone says it makes them feel nice," Lahren told Watters’ World host Jesse Watters on Saturday. "These people need to understand that it’s a privilege to be an American and it’s a privilege that you work toward—it’s not a right."

After hearing Lahren's tirade, writer and genealogist Jennifer Mendelsohn decided to do a little digging into Lahren's family tree. Turns out Lahren's great-great-grandfather didn't "work toward" the "privilege" of becoming a citizen quite the way she might have hoped. In fact, according to Mendelsohn's research, he was indicted (albeit ultimately acquitted) for forging his immigration papers in order to get US citizenship.

Lahren's complaint about immigrants "not understanding the language" came back to bite her, too. According to Mendelsohn's research, after 41 years in America, Lahren's great-grandmother still spoke German. After ten years here, her great-great-grandmother still spoke no English.

"This is not about playing gotcha," Mendelsohn wrote in a separate tweet. "But as long as people like Lahren continue to push a specious agenda that suggests today's immigrants are somehow wholly different from previous ones, I'll keep showing just how alike they really are."

Lahren did not immediately respond to Mendelsohn, but all blatant hypocrisy aside, she should just be happy she scored some genealogy results, free of charge—Ancestry.com costs a goddamn fortune.

Sign up for our newsletter to get the best of VICE delivered to your inbox daily.

Follow VICE on Twitter.

This article originally appeared on VICE US.


Trump's Rampant Corruption Will Actually Hurt Him Soon

$
0
0

Of all the racist, cruel, and generally unhinged utterances delivered by Donald Trump throughout his nightmare of a presidential campaign, one that broke through the clutter and continues to resonate well over a year into his presidency was a hypothetical: "I could stand in the middle of Fifth Avenue and shoot somebody and I wouldn't lose voters," the then-candidate said to devotees in Iowa in January 2016.

Beyond that trademark Trumpian hyperbole lurked some truth. After winning the election despite too many scandals to count, it really did seem like he could get away with anything without losing meaningful support. Even Special Counsel Robert Mueller's probe, which has already made convicted felons out of multiple former Trump associates, has failed to put much of a dent in his support, according to a multitude of public surveys. Liberals might indulge fantasies of impeachment, but so long as over 40 percent of the country either doesn't mind or actively approves of the president's conduct, none of that matters, right?

Nowhere is Trump's scandal-proof teflon more apparent than the shocking number of cases of clear-cut, old-school corruption that have gone almost entirely unpunished. The president's personal lawyer–slash–consigliere extracting millions of dollars from major corporations with business before the government and depositing it into a slush fund that he used to pay women who apparently had affairs with Trump. The president's budget chief being placed in charge of the nation's most promising consumer protection agency only to dismantle it from within and coach bankers on how to corrupt it from the outside. The head of the EPA meeting constantly with lobbyists for oil and coal companies so he can help kill regulations and make them richer while spending bizarre amounts on travel and security, among other goodies. The head of Housing and Urban Development allegedly using his position to benefit his son's business interests.



The most recently exposed bit of self-dealing centers on Secretary of Education Betsy DeVos. As the New York Times reported this weekend, DeVos appears to have effectively dismantled the team of investigators that was probing shady for-profit colleges accused of preying on desperate students. Not only does that look awful given several of DeVos's own hires at the federal agency worked at the same worthless degree mills under scrutiny, but also because Trump himself agreed in 2016 to pay out a massive settlement over allegations of systemic fraud at his own since-shuttered racket, Trump University. It sometimes seems like there's a staffer in the White House whose sole job is to make sure we don't go more than week or two without some comical bit of unethical behavior spilling out into the open.

And as Jamelle Bouie wrote at Slate recently, it's not just the Republicans in Congress looking the other way on all this stuff—the indifference has filtered down to the crowds that sometimes still yell "Lock Her Up" about Hillary Clinton. He cited one West Virginia voter who was planning to support convicted mining magnate Don Blankenship, a guy who went to prison after an accident in one of his mines killed 29 workers, in a US Senate primary: "I want an honest crook, and that’s Blankenship," the voter told ABC News. The convicted felon lost (after Trump told people to vote against him), but if so much of the country expects so little from the political system and its elites—if everyone is shady, and Trump is just seen as the honest crook—is there any act that would inspire Republicans in Congress to oppose Trump? Or can administration officials simply do whatever they want and take money from whoever offers it to them? (A VICE News Tonight mini-survey of Trump voters last fall found that yes, in fact, some would stand by their man if he actually shot someone in the street.)

There is still something resembling a bridge too far in this era—Trump's first Health Secretary Tom Price was forced to resign after his own penchant for taxpayer-funded air travel, among other indulgences, spilled into the open. But rather than centering on any kind of ethical standard or neutral arbiter, those whose corruption goes unpunished under Trump often seem to survive solely based on how much negative press they generate, whether their boss happens to catch wind of it, and whether an ideologically suitable replacement is waiting in the wings.

That's left liberals across America to look to the Robert Mueller on one hand, and the midterms on the other, as potential sources of salvation. But even if Mueller ultimately were to conclude the president personally committed crimes, it's hard to imagine the current Congress doing anything about it.

That means the real action is in the midterms, where the hope for Democrats—the thing they actually need to be yelling about nonstop between now and November—is, as with most things in life, all about money. At least one recent CNN poll has suggested support for Mueller has sagged—Republicans seem to buy the idea that he's just targeting the president for partisan reasons, and the Russia investigation is not voters' number one concern. But even if Democrats only won the House, they'd be able to investigate cases of shameless financial corruption—and opining about it could help put them there in the first place. After all, one of Trump's major messages was that he'd "drain the swamp," a promise that he hasn't even attempted to follow through on.

"He is in the process of building the biggest swamp in decades—if not longer—in Washington," Fred Wertheimer, president and founder of Democracy 21, a nonpartisan good government group, told me of Trump.

Wertheimer, who has been advocating for campaign finance reform since before I was born, noted that even as recent polls suggested the president's approval rating had ticked upward despite the deluge of apparent corruption, the public hasn't given up on the idea of good government. A Pew survey conducted over the first few months of this year found that 77 percent of Americans supported limits on donations to politicians and issues—and that some 65 percent actually thought new laws might help rein in corruption.

Winning an election with corruption issues at the forefront would send a message. Yes, Americans elected a maniac, power-drunk narcissist to the presidency, in the process ignoring his obvious authoritarian impulses. But Trump isn't immune to scandal, even if he seems to bathe in it with aplomb. If it looks an awful lot like the president and his friends are using the American presidency to get richer (and make their pals in industry richer, too), history suggests voters will punish them for it. That's what happened in 2006 with the Jack Abramoff-Tom DeLay lobbying scandal—Democrats romped that November—and back in the 1974 Watergate midterms, when an entire generation of reform-minded lawmakers were swept into power just two years after Richard Nixon won one of the largest electoral landslides ever.

Matt Canter, a senior vice president at political polling and consulting firm Global Strategy group and former top official at the Democratic Senatorial Campaign Committee, pointed out in an interview that the kind of corruption on display these days actually does tend to resonate with the public. That is, we're not just seeing lobbyists or donors get special access and influencing policy—we're also seeing people around the president (and perhaps the president himself) personally enrich themselves along the way.

"Trump is certainly a different animal, there's no doubt about that," Canter told me of the challenge in breaking through the postmodern media maelstrom to focus attention on ethics issues. "But I think there's a compelling case to be made about corruption in this administration—even to supporters of Donald Trump."

He cited Democratic midterm challengers, some of whom his own firm is working with, who have put the issue front and center in their TV ads early in the midterm election season. Like Abigail Spanberger, who's challenging incumbent Dave Brat in the Richmond, Virginia, suburbs. Or Max Rose, the Democrat running for the House seat in Staten Island and Brooklyn that could be represented on the Republican side by convicted fraudster Michael Grimm, perhaps most famous for threatening to throw a reporter off a balcony and "break" him "in half... like a boy."

If and when Democrats do win Congress, they'll have the power to subpoena key administration officials and hold constant hearings harassing the White House and executive branch agencies for wrongdoing. That might not lead to resignations, but it would at least ensure that stories of officials ignoring or straight-up sabotaging their duties remained in the public eye, and could create a feedback loop for future accountability.

Donald Trump and the people around him have long demonstrated they don't have much of a sense of shame. But the whole point of elections is that voters have the chance, occasionally, to be the conscience politicians might lack. If Democrats campaign and win on an anti-corruption message, it will be a powerful sign that yes, Americans still reject the kind of amoral looting practiced by Trump and his ilk. It will be a sign that it's not just journalists at outlets like ProPublica and the New York Times and staffers at good-government groups who care about this stuff, but all of America, too.

Sign up for our newsletter to get the best of VICE delivered to your inbox daily.

Follow Matt Taylor on Twitter.

This article originally appeared on VICE US.

We Took a Wild and Weird Ride on the Weeble Wobble

$
0
0

Performance artist David Henry Nobody Jr. finally brought his years-long project The Human Weeble Wobble to the masses after it went viral on Instagram last year. "It's a metaphor for one of the core things of being human," he told us. "There's a hope that when you get knocked on your ass, you stand back up."

We followed Nobody Jr. as he transported his giant two-ton creation to a warehouse-gallery space in Brooklyn and watched people get their chance to get wild and weird on the Weeble Wobble.

Sign up for our newsletter to get the best of VICE delivered to your inbox daily.

This article originally appeared on VICE US.

Uni Lecturer Was 'Unaware' Rape Is Wrong, Court Told

$
0
0

Former Canberra University law lecturer Arthur Marshall Hoyle is currently serving a four-year prison sentence for the rape of a student, making unwanted advances towards two others, and showing a fourth student a pornographic PowerPoint slide.

He was found guilty in 2017 for the crimes, which occurred in 2015 when Hoyle invited the women, all international students, into his office to discuss allegations of plagiarism.

However, according to 9 News, Hoyle's lawyers launched an appeal today at the ACT Supreme Court, claiming Hoyle wasn't aware at the time that his actions were wrong.

They submitted reports that discuss Hoyle's mental capacity, including one report by Neurology professor Bruce Brew, which says Hoyle was "more likely than not" experiencing brain damage.

This would mean a reduction in Hoyle's impulse control and in his recognition of social-cues, Brew's report explains. Brew also claims Hoyle has frontal lobe damage following three traumatic brain injuries, on top of a neurodegenerative disease.

Hoyle still claims that the sexual intercourse with the student who accused him of rape never occurred.

"He seemed to have some idea that maybe he'd done something wrong," Brew told ACT Supreme Court today, 9 News reports. "In his [Hoyle's] world," Brew added, the actions for which he was convicted might have seemed admissible.

The hearing continues.

This article originally appeared on VICE AU.

The Trailer for Spike Lee and Jordan Peele's 'BlacKkKlansman' Is Incredible

$
0
0

On Monday, Focus Features dropped the first trailer for Spike Lee's upcoming 70s KKK movie, BlacKkKlansman, produced by Jordan Peele—and it looks just as brilliant as you'd expect a Lee and Peele team-up to be.

The upcoming film is based on the true story of a black undercover cop named Ron Stallworth who, in 1978, infiltrated a Colorado chapter of the Ku Klux Klan all the way to the top and sabotaged the organization from the inside. From the looks of the trailer, Lee's adaptation brings some serious buddy-cop vibes to the story, with John David Washington starring as Stallworth and Adam Driver as his partner, Flip, who serves as Stallworth's body double. It also stars Laura Harrier, Ryan Eggold, and a smarmy-ass Topher Grace as KKK head David Duke.

"We'll establish contact over the phone," Stallworth explains to his police chief in the trailer. "We'll need a white officer to play me when they meet face-to-face, so there becomes a combined Ron Stallworth."

"Can you do that?" the chief asks.

"With the right white man, you can do anything," Stallworth grins.

BlacKkKlansman is produced by Peele's production company Monkeypaw alongside Jason Blum of Blumhouse, who previously worked with Peele on Get Out. David Rabinowitz and Charlie Wachtel penned the script—adapted from Stallworth's 2014 memoir of the same name—alongside Spike Lee and Kevin Willimont. The movie is scheduled to hit theaters on August 10, the one-year anniversary of the alt-right rally in Charlottesville. Until then, give the trailer a watch above.

Sign up for our newsletter to get the best of VICE delivered to your inbox daily.

Follow VICE on Twitter.

This article originally appeared on VICE US.

I Got Arrested Today While Praying the US Finally Confronts Poverty

$
0
0

One might not expect getting arrested to be in the work plan for someone elected to lead a major religious association in the US, but that is exactly how I am closing out my first year as president of the Unitarian Universalist Association.

Alongside the Rev. Dr. William Barber of the Poor People’s Campaign and dozens of other faith leaders, I was arrested near the US Capitol on Monday as I prayed that our society reconnects with the moral soul of our humanity and to ignite what will be 40 days of similar direct action protests across the country before we return to Washington at the end of next month.

Fifty years ago Martin Luther King, Jr. articulated the interrelatedness between what he called the three evils of racism, economic exploitation, and militarism. At the time, this larger economic and military critique lost him much of the liberal support that had amassed for his campaigns when they were targeted narrowly on Southern discrimination.

But if there is anything that this past year has confirmed, it is that we need not just a continuation of the interconnected justice work Dr. King named but an escalation of it.

The hard truth is that the United States has lost ground.

For the 20 percent of Americans who live economically secure lives and see shiny development in our metropolises, it may be difficult to reconcile, but it is true. The other 80 percent of Americans are not doing well.

There is an illusion of progress that must be pulled back. Schools today are more segregated than they were 40 years ago. Despite all our narratives of forward motion, more than half of the country lives paycheck to paycheck with less than $1,000 to their name. And if we continue as-is, it is estimated that the median wealth of black people in the US will effectively be reduced to zero in the coming decades with losses for Latinos trailing not far behind.



It isn’t because we are poor as a nation. It is because our abundant wealth is held in the hands of the few and spent on war and militarism. As Rev. Barber observed regarding the most recent spending bill Congress passed, “The Republicans are bragging about doing right by the military and the Democrats are bragging about doing right by the middle class and no one is talking about the poor.” Dr. King said that “a country that spends more year after year on the military than it does on programs of social uplift is approaching spiritual death.”

I believe that our country, in more ways than one, is on life support. The heart of our nation has been hardened to the cries of the poor, the vulnerable.

It isn’t a question of we as a country being broke. It is our priorities and our sense of interconnectedness that are broken. We spend 53 cents of every dollar on the military but a fraction of that on social services. We are forced to fight to save Meals on Wheels at the same time we watch the wealthiest CEOs build new mansions with the profits they gained from not paying taxes.

The fact that Martin Luther King has a national holiday and Rosa Parks has a medal of honor might give us the feeling of progress, but what the Poor People’s Campaign has shown me, like #BlackLivesMatter in recent years, is that the civil rights movement is not over and never ended—nor did opposition to it.

I saw that opposition clearly and painfully in the streets of Charlottesville, Virginia, last August. During the nazi events there, law enforcement and police abdicated their responsibility and stood down while white supremacists armed with shields, bats, helmets, guns, and fiery torches brought terror and intimidation to a town and attacked people of color and nonviolent faith leaders such as myself.

In the face of these hard facts and dangerous times, the Poor People’s campaign is called a moral revival. Because 50 years after King warned that we were becoming a "thing-based society," we’re seeking not just material and policy changes for economic and racial justice. We desperately require a recommitment and reconnection to the human dignity each of us is robbed of when every aspect of our life is commodified and measured by market values.

My faith teaches me that salvation is collective, that any "kingdom" is what we make here on earth. In Arizona, where I was minister for some time, I marched with workers in the Fight for 15 campaign who’s modest demand was a raise to $25,000 per year for full-time work. As we marched through one of the wealthiest neighborhoods in the US, on our way to Walton family estate, we could see through the grandiose gates to copper-domed homes. It made me and fellow church leaders wonder, How much is enough? How could you not want to pay your workers what they ask, what they need to survive, when you have so much?

Without an answer to that question, it becomes obvious why a faith leader would be in handcuffs outside the Capitol in 2018. The work is not yet finished.

The challenges we face have solutions. The resources are available. Investments in programs of social uplift in education, housing, healthcare are possible—and we know they work, we’ve seen it before. But it will require a radical shift in our values. It will take nothing less than a moral revival.

In the absence of the money to buy speech or politicians, we still have the power of faith and of the force of agape love that Dr. King spoke of as the force that could save us as a nation and recover the goodness and possibility that lives in us all. My hope is that this time, we not pull away from the fullness of the revolution in values that it requires.

Sign up for our newsletter to get the best of VICE delivered to your inbox daily.

Rev. Susan Frederick-Gray is President of the Unitarian Universalist Association. Follow her on Twitter.

This article originally appeared on VICE US.

Viewing all 38002 articles
Browse latest View live