Quantcast
Channel: VICE CA
Viewing all 38002 articles
Browse latest View live

Beheadings, Prison Riots, and Graft: How a Cartel War Is Tearing Brazil Apart

$
0
0

Ultraviolent prison rebellions in northern Brazil have escalated a cartel war in one of the world's most profitable corridors for cocaine trafficking. The massacre of at least 140 inmates so far this year—many tortured, beheaded, or dismembered by rivals—has naturally grabbed international headlines. But as someone who's covered the Amazon during its latest boom and bust, I've seen that the carnage within the prison walls is a consequence of a more insidious crisis in the world's largest forest: narco-corruption that blurs the line between cops and hitmen, governors and kingpins.

For decades, Brazilian prisons have been nerve centers for organized crime where cartel bosses direct drug traffic, order murders, and use torture and extortion to dominate the overcrowded system. On New Year's Day in Manaus, a sprawling port city on the banks of the Amazon River, the homegrown syndicate Familia do Norte (FDN) executed 56 inmates at a privately managed prison outside town. The FDN targeted rival members of the Primeiro Comando da Capital (PCC), Brazil's most powerful criminal organization, rooted in São Paulo. Four nights later at a state prison in neighboring Roraima state, PCC members butchered 31 inmates in an apparent reprisal. To quarantine the violence, authorities in Manaus have been shuttling high risk inmates to other prisons, but four more inmates were killed at an alternate facility within days, and uprisings are spreading elsewhere in the region despite a security crackdown.

The recent prison unrest is the most violent in Brazil since more than 100 prisoners were killed by military police during the notorious Carandiru massacre in São Paulo in 1992. Now cell phone images from the dungeon-like prisons have shocked a nation already reeling from the nationwide Lava Jato (car wash) graft scandal that saw dozens of corrupt politicians and businessmen sentenced to time in the spacious, air-conditioned facilities reserved for white-collar offenders. Security and intelligence officials are convening in Brasilia to test the winds of the gathering storm, but they are at least years—and arguably decades—behind the crisis. In mid-2016, as the world celebrated the Olympic games in Rio de Janeiro, a fragile alliance between the PCC and Rio's dominant Comando Vermelho (CV) began to fall apart. Up north, the Comando Vermelho has formed their own alliance with the Familia do Norte to extinguish any competition in the Amazon.

Relatives of inmates ask for information at the main gate of the Anisio Jobim Penitentiary Complex after a riot left at least 60 people killed and several injured, in Manaus, Amazonia state, Brazil on January 2, 2017. At least 60 people were killed in a prison riot in Brazil's Amazon region when fighting broke out between rival gangs. Photo by MARCIO SILVA/AFP/Getty Images

A city of two million people surrounded by millions of square miles of rain forest, Manaus has historically been defined by isolation, but a turn of the century commodities boom in Brazil helped finance billions in development in the Amazon. In 2014 and 2016, Manaus hosted World Cup and Olympic soccer matches in an urban center transformed by an influx of capital. Yet the uneven investments, catering to the tastes of a rarefied consumer class, only magnified inequality in the region. Now wealthy elites luxuriate in gleaming condos and frigid sushi bars while thousands of working-class residents live without running water or electricity along the city's maze of igarapés—polluted little rivers that rise and fall with the seasonal ebb and flow of the Amazon.

A tax-free port makes Manaus a manufacturing hub for home electronics, appliances, cars, and motorcycles, but the international waterway also makes the Amazon a lucrative channel for the distribution of narcotics and firearms to Brazil's largest cities and the open waters of the Atlantic. The volatile local economy makes the streets especiallyripe for recruitment by one ofBrazil's fastest growing cartels. In labyrinthine low-income neighborhoods across the city, kids stand watch on street corners, their fanny packs stocked with cash and cocaine cut and weighed in nearby houses. At trendy bars in the city's wealthier districts—some just blocks away from the poorest streets—patrons place orders by phone, and grams getdelivered with a slap out the window of passing cars. Homicides areoverwhelming the city's detectives and morgues, with bodies routinely found ripening on the outskirts of the city, where streetlights and telephone poles end in jungle.

All of that drug trafficking takes its toll. Thirty-four percent of inmates in the state prison system are there on drug-related crimes. Many wait behind bars for a year before trial. In 2015 and 2016, I visited a prison for pre-trial detainees, the Instituto Penal Antȏnio Trindade (IPAT), one of three private facilities on a road north of the city limits, past the newly renovated international airport, past the golf resort, past the landfill where vultures stir at the commotion of passing logging trucks. Out of sight, out of mind—until something goes wrong. The massacre on New Year's Day this year began when dozens of inmates escaped from IPAT to create a diversion for their brothers at another complex up the road for convicted prisoners.

What I saw during my visit to IPAT was an institution clinging to the illusion of security, a weary staff going through motions—ID checks and pat downs, metal detectors and X-rays—that everyone knew were no match for the will of the crime bosses inside. If the bosses wanted a gun, or a girl, or a precision scale inside these walls, they could find a way. If they wanted someone dead outside these walls, they could place a call.

I was there to investigate the July 2015 hit of a detainee whose beheading sparked a weekend of reprisal killings in Manaus that would come to be known as the Bloody Weekend. More than 38 homicides in 72 hours, some victims shot by cartel rivals, others shot by police in retaliation for the death of a beloved sergeant. To quell the violence, government officials visited one of the state prisons to negotiate for peace with FDN leaders, offering dominion of a prison cell block in exchange for a cease fire in the streets.

Negotiating with the state is the magnitude of power the FDN can exercise when it controls traffic onthe Solimões River, the murky waterway that links Manaus to Peru and Colombia, two of the largest cocaine-producing countries in the world.

A Brazilian federal police agent scans the banks of the Solimies River from a speed boat during Operation Cobra May 6, 2003 near the border of Brazil, Peru and Colombia. Agents were looking for a boat on the river carrying a large shipment of cocaine from Colombia. Photo by Andre Vieira/Getty Images

In December 2015, I took a boat 36 hours up the Solimões River to Tabatinga, a sleepy town that shares the riverine tri-border between with Brazil, Peru, and Colombia. What I saw was an impossible front for a drug war—a landscape where interwoven cultures and rivers make borders difficult to navigate, and poverty and exploitation warp the rule of law.

The frontier between Tabatinga and Leticia—capital of the Colombian Amazon—amounts to a speed bump on the main avenue where a yawning guard watches scooter traffic, a machine gun slung over his shoulder. Santa Rosa, Peru, is only accessible by boat, a twinkling village across the river channel where European cruise ships moor and tourists disembark for jungle tours. You wouldn't know it by day, but an estimated 300 tons of cocaine enter Brazil via Tabatinga each year, according to the federal police agent I interviewed there in 2015.

Cocaine and the raw materials used to process it cross the border year-round, primarily by boat. Traffic peaks during the wet season, when the heavy rains open channels in the flooded forest, allowing smugglers to navigate past checkpoints on the main river. Federal inspectors routinely stop boats, but just as in the region's prisons, the search and seizure efforts on the river intercept only a fraction a tiny fraction of contraband. Colombian and Peruvian syndicates are experts at disguising their products in almost any form, from hair gel to plastic toys and book pages. While the big cartels command the attention of international law enforcement, micro-traffickers try to exploit the overwhelmed system. The week I visited, inspectors at the Tabatinga airport—which has one flight a day—arrested a woman crossing through security with a belt of cocaine bricks taped under her blouse. It seemed like an absurd attempt at smuggling, but if some bricks didn't get through that way, there'd be no use in trying.

Infrastructure development in Manaus has aided the Familia do Norte as much as it has benefited international corporations like Samsung and Harley Davidson, connecting legal and illicit business alike to meet the demand of Brazil's growing domestic markets for durable goods, narcotics and firearms.

The scourge of drug traffic has ravaged Upper Solimões indigenous communities, which suffer from disproportionate rates of addiction, domestic violence and suicide. Cartels extort indigenous men to cross their shipments; authorities recruit indigenous agents to go undercover; in Tabatinga and Leticia, urbanized, detribalized Indians wander alleyways by night, scrounging up liquor or cocoa paste.

"The cartels build houses right on the borderline," an officer of the Colombian National Police told me in Leticia last April. "If we bust in, they just move to the other side of the house. We can't fire a shot unless we have Brazilian or Peruvian forces with us."

International cooperation has its limitations when sovereignty is the top priority—and when the drug business complicates regional politics. According to the Brazilian federal prosecutor, the FDN is bolstered by Colombia's FARC rebel group, which sells the cartel drugs, assault rifles and grenades, among other tools of the trade.

A 2015 international investigation of the FDN uncovered evidence that their operations are becoming more sophisticated. Legal teams. International wire transfers. Newfound efforts to influence politics back in the capital, where the real money flows. Meanwhile, development in Manaus has aided the Familia do Norte as much as it has benefited international corporations like Samsung and Harley Davidson, connecting legal and illicit business alike to meet the demand of Brazil's growing domestic markets for durable goods, narcotics, and firearms.

One of Brayayn Mota's posts after his escape from IPAT. Photo via Facebook

Many of the city's residents have gone from sporadic electricity to Instagram in less than a decade. Brayan Mota, one of the IPAT escapees, posted a selfie on New Year's Day as he and his friends scampered through the forest. Within hours, they were online folk heroes, photoshopped onto a movie poster of Shawshank Redemption. Within a week, the kid was the hero in a side-scrolling mobile game. During the massacre, prisoners grabbed photos and cell phone videos that circulated nationwide on social and traditional media in what some analysts describe as a propaganda campaign not unlike the tactics used by ISIS to spread fear and intimidation.

Days after the catastrophe in Manaus, members of the PCC seemed tocondemn the attack: "Our goal was always to fight against the State and not against our brothers, even of other organizations," wrote one alleged member of the PCC's High Council of the North Region, asking partner organizations for donations to support the victim's families. "Know that you declare war not only to the PCC, but to all those who fight against the corrupt Brazilian State."

Agents of the troubled Brazilian state have responded with their own condemnations.

"There were no saints," said Amazonas Governor José Melo of the FDN's victims. "These were murderers, rapists."

Yet the same federal investigation that revealed the Amazon government was negotiating for peace in the prisons also revealed that state officials may have traded favors for votes. A 2014 recording allegedly captured State Subsecretary of Justice and Human Rights Major Carliomar Barros Brandão assuring the cartel legal protection in exchange for votes from FDN loyalists: "Nobody will touch you," he apparently told FDN leader José Roberto Fernandes Barbosa.

It was a chance for the FDN to flex its new political muscle: "He will have more than 100,000 votes," Barbosa said, touting his sway in a certain quarter of the city. "You imagine every prisoner who has family there: If we give an order, they will comply."

Chris Feliciano Arnold is the author of "The Third Bank of the River: Blood, Power and Survival in the Twenty-First Century Amazon," forthcoming from Picador USA.


The 50 Most Common Questions Asked About America from Abroad

$
0
0

Every day, a whole bunch of people use Google's search engine to help answer all manner of questions, from important life-changing decisions like what to eat for lunch, to trivial queries about how many albums the band Hoobastank has put out (five).

Though America may now be an empire in decline, a decent number of these global inquiries are about the USA. With help from the Google team, we collected and answered the 50 most common questions about America from the rest of the world. Turns out that people have heard about our military prowess.

What time is it in America?

At time of press: 7:43 AM, 8:43 AM, 9:43 AM, 10:43, 11:43 AM, and 12:43 PM, depending on where you're standing. We're a pretty big country and we often have to ask this question of ourselves when coordinating communications with friends, family, and colleagues thousands of miles away. Best to tailor your query to a specific city for future time inquiries.

How many states are in the USA?

This is an easy one. There are 50 states. That said, we also have Washington D.C. and 16 island territories like Puerto Rico that are like states, but the citizens have fewer rights. It's kinda fucked up.

How many people are in the US?

The most recent census has us at 324,406,583 citizens and we have a net gain of one person every 17 seconds so… "medium a lot?"

How old is America?

We were officially founded in 1776, so that has us at a relatively spry 238 years young, but you could be pedantic and argue older based on when colonists got here. All you need to know is that we're old enough. ;)

When was America discovered?

I'm sure you didn't mean to open such a can of worms with this question, my inquisitive foreign friend, but this is a highly contested subject. Columbus got here in 1492, but we're starting to collectively realize that he was a genocidal piece of shit and, since there were humans already living here when he came through, maybe he shouldn't get so much praise for his "discovery."

Who won the 2016 Election?

A lot of people won their respective Senate, House, and Gubernatorial races, but if you just mean the presidency, Donald Trump won.

What is the capital of America?

Washington, D.C.

Who discovered America?

As noted above, this is all a matter of perspective and how you define discovery. Columbus is the go-to answer, but there might have been some other Europeans who beat him, or this Islamist scholar who figured out it was there using math. And then, of course, there are the Clovis people who walked across the land bridge from Asia.

What percentage of Americans vote?

In the November general election, only 59.7 percent of those eligible voted.

Who is the president of America?

As of Friday, Donald J. Trump is the POTUS. Most of us are just as confused about how that happened as you are.

When was slavery abolished in USA?

The 13th amendment, which abolished slavery, was ratified on December 6th, 1865. Of course, that doesn't mean every slave was suddenly unshackled that day like at the end of The Wiz. We were terrible enough to find ways to keep quasi-slavery going for quite a while after that.

How many Americans died in WW2?

Calculating war death is tricky, but we lost around 405,000 military and civilian lives with another 30,000 who went missing. Russia lost 24 million in the same conflict, so you could say we got off easy.

Who found America?

Knock it off.

Is Puerto Rico part of the United States?

Yes, PR is a territory and likely to remain one (i.e. not become a state).

How many gold medals does USA have?

We have earned 1,118 gold medals over the 49 Olympic games we've participated in. This puts us in first place for all time totals, well ahead of the Soviet Union's paltry 473 golds. We get a gold medal in gold-medal-having. USA! USA! USA!

How to move to America?

You could sneak in, marry someone, fill out a bunch of paperwork and wait forever, visit and then defect if your homeland sucks. There's a bunch of ways to pull this off but, honestly, with the new president, ongoing economic slump, and half the country hating immigrants, now might not be the best time to come over.

Is America a county?

Yes? I mean, officially it's "The United States of America" but "America" has become acceptable shorthand, whether or not South America likes it.

When was America great?

Good question. The answer depends on what color your skin is and the inherent subjectivity of "greatness," of course.

Is America a democracy?

Another one where I wish I could give you a clear cut answer but, alas, this is also up for debate. We are a representative democracy in that we elect officials to act on our behalf, but that rarely pans out as we'd like it to.

As many point out, we're also a republic. There's overlap between democracies and republics. It's like the square and rectangle classification thing in geometry.

How many registered voters are in the US?

Over 200 million were registered to vote in the November election. Only 138 million voted, in the end, so I guess 60 million people had somewhere better to be that day.

How many aircraft carriers does the US have?

We currently have ten active carriers and thee more buns in the oven.

We probably don't need that many but, let's be real, aircraft carriers are pretty sick. You get the best of land, air, and sea all scrunched up into one.

How many Americans are there?

I just told you. I'll look again. Ok, we're at 324,406,913 now. Not that drastic a change. Don't ask again.

Where is America?

Don't you see? America was in your heart the whole time.

But also, we're on planet Earth smushed between Canada and Mexico with the Pacific and Atlantic Oceans bookending our west and east coasts respectively.

How many illegal immigrants are in the US?

As of 2014, we had 11.1 million undocumented immigrants living in the United States, but that's really just us spit-balling. Turns out, people trying to live under the radar are somewhat hard to keep data on.

When did the US enter WW2?

We took some potshots from the sidelines going all the way back to 1940, but we officially clicked "going" on WW2's Facebook event invite on December 7th, 1941, after the Japanese attacked Pearl Harbor.

How many Americans died in Vietnam?

Assuming you're just asking about the war and not including the tourists who choked on Banh Mis last year, 58,209 Americans died in Vietnam.

Why did the US enter WW1?

A German U-boat torpedoed and sank the British vessel Lusitania, killing (among others) 129 Americans who were aboard. Soon after, a telegraph was intercepted wherein Germany was promising Mexico a bunch of (formerly Mexican) US land if they joined sides with the Huns.

Congress was like "talk shit, get hit" and voted to join the Great War on April 6th, 1917.

How to move to Canada from US?

Why are you, someone who isn't in the US, asking how to move to Canada from the US?

Anyway, if you want to do things by the books, you're going to need to fill out a ton of paperwork, spend more than you probably have saved, and wait for a while to be allowed it. Even if you try to marry a Canadian, you're still looking at a wait time of 14 months.

It might just be easier to sneak across the border and pray Trudeau's softer on illegal immigrants than Trump.

Who really discovered America?

No! Fuck off.

What is the country code for USA?

We're #1. No, literally, it's just +1.

How to watch US Netflix?

Well, I hope you watch it on a large screen so you can really take in all the visuals. And comfortably, maybe with a friend or a loved one.

If you're talking about skirting regional restrictions, you could download a VPN.

How much is a US stamp?

Our stamps cost $0.47. Be sure to buy "forever stamps" though. They still count, even if the regular stamp price goes up! There is zero reason not to get these inflation-proof bad boys.

How to get job in USA?

According to baby boomers it's as easy as walking into a store, demanding to speak to the manager, and asking if they're hiring.

How many guns in America?

Somewhere in the ballpark of 300 million guns are floating around America. That's almost one for every man, woman, and child. And if you haven't seen a child popping off rounds at the gun range, you ain't lived, brother.

What is Thanksgiving in USA?

Thanksgiving is an annual holiday where extended families come together to argue over politics and eat a meal that nobody is particularly jazzed about. Nobody has actually been thankful for something at a Thanksgiving meal since 2003.

How to apply for US visa?

Business or pleasure? Once you know which of the 20 US visas you're applying for, just fill out some paperwork online and busy yourself for a few weeks while you wait for it to be processed.

How many people are in the US military?

We've got 1,281,900 people in active duty military and another 801,200 junior varsity troops spread out across our reserve forces. Don't mess with us, buster.

What percentage of America is white?

Obligatory "race is a social construct" aside, the self-identified non-Hispanic white population was at 63 percent in the 2012 census, but that number has likely shrunk a bit since.

Is United States a country?

For the time being, yes, United States is still a country.

What does America mean?

People have been trying to figure that out since the country's inception. Best guess: capitalism.

If you mean the word itself, it's just named after some dude, Amerigo Vespucci, who sailed around the world a bunch during the Renaissance.

How many nukes does the US have?

We're sitting on a war chest of 4,760 nuclear weapons with varying degrees of BOOM-power.

That might sound like a huge number but, in fact, we've decommissioned a fuck-ton since the 60s and 70s, when you couldn't leave the house without tripping over a Fat Man.

Is Canada a part of the US?

Nah. It ain't like that between us and Canada.

How to call US from Mexico?

You can either use the +1 trick from above when dialing, or speak into the tin can and string set up we have over by Juarez.

How many Indians are in the USA?

As of 2010, there were 2,843,391 Indian-Americans living in the United States.

How many millionaires are in the US?

We've got millions of millionaires here in the USA—10.4 million American households bootstrapped themselves up to a net worth of over $1,000,000.

But we only have one Chamillionaire.

When did America become a country?

We might've been founded on July 4th, 1776, but most historians agree that America truly became a country the following weekend when the founders all went out to Joshua Tree to shroom and bond.

Is today a holiday in the US?

Probably. We love boring filler holidays here. Even if there isn't an A-list calendar holiday happening on a given date, you can bet some state legislature has deemed it "Crème brûlée appreciation day" or some bullshit.

Where is weed legal in the US?

I'm going to direct you to this map because neither you nor I want a list of 28 state names here.

How many time zones are in the US?

It's been so long since your first question about time that I'll forgive you for forgetting. There are six time zones in the US, my dear.

How many Syrian refugees in USA?

Ending on a chipper note, I see. With 4 million Syrians fleeing their homes and ISIS and desperate for a place to turn, the US has graciously agreed to take in... (drumroll)… 16,000, give or take.

Brexit Will Force Us to Face Up to the Grizzly Truth About Empire

$
0
0

Just some great mates hanging out. 'The 78th Highlanders at the taking of Sucunderabagh, Siege of Lucknow', by Orlando Norie. 1857. The Anne S. K. Brown Military Collection, Brown University Library. (Image via Victorian Web)

Who are Theresa May's "old friends"? In the speech last week in which she announced Britain will be leaving the single market, the prime minister made reference to "old friends" three times when outlining her post-Brexit orientation to the world. Britain will "reach out", "build new relationships" and "reach new trade agreements" with these absent buddies when it's free from the shackles of European-wide trade agreements.

Since there hasn't been any clarity on her choice of words, we can only assume that "old friends" is a euphemism for the former the British Empire, later the Commonwealth of Nations, now simply The Commonwealth – a pointless institution headed up by the Queen that no one pays attention to, apart from athletes every four years.

These "old friends" are former colonial subjects – vast territories of the world, around 50 independent countries, that were dominated and exploited by the "great, global trading nation" that was the United Kingdom. I wonder if the hundreds of Kenyans tortured – even castrated – by the British for fighting for independence are old friends. How about the five million Indians starved to death in the Bengal Famine at Churchill's behest (an event conspicuously absent from Boris Johnson's biography of the man)?

No one talks about Empire in Britain. It's what gave this country the resources to industrialise and become the preeminent capitalist hegemon in the 18th and 19th century; it's what allowed it to establish trading routes and military bases in key strategic centres around the world; it's where Britain experimented with the use of aerial bombardment and concentration camps as a means of controlling populations well before they were used in World War Two; it's what gave the post-war Labour Party the resources to build the welfare state and, later, the labour to come and service the NHS. The Empire gave Britain its very identity, and wasn't built through the reciprocal nature of "friendship" but through a monopoly of violence established by sheer force.

One of the many things Brexit has revealed is this unprocessed legacy of Empire. To think that Britain's dominions, many of which are economically outpacing their former master, can be referred to as "old friends" is a delusion. It wasn't just May's speech that signalled this return of the repressed. Another example was the "Britannia Rules the Waves" nostalgia of the Telegraph-led campaign to bring back the Royal Yacht. Foreign Secretary Boris Johnson expressed a desire to revive the rotting corpse of Empire, too, saying, "We used to run the biggest empire the world has ever seen, with a much smaller domestic population and a relatively tiny civil service… Are we really unable to do trade deals?"

Leaving the many crimes against humanity aside, the trading relationships with the Commonwealth weren't exactly those of besties. Well into the 1950s Britain used the Sterling Area – the dominions forcibly pegged to the Sterling currency – to buy stuff in the colonies for less than market value. For instance, "Colonial marketing boards" obliged West African countries to sell their palm oil to Britain for much less than they could have got selling them at the global market rate. When Harold Wilson was thinking of ways of make up for Britain's trade deficit, he pointed out that no one in the House of Commons could "deny that the answer to all our problems may be well found 200 or 1,000 feet below the soil in the Colonial areas".

Theresa May (Photo: Policy Exchange, via)

Ironically, it was Britain's decline as an Empire as those dominions secured independence that encouraged the Conservative Party and capitalist class to turn towards economic integration with Europe. But 50 years later, now that much of that same class feels stifled and neutered by Brussels, what sort of relationship with Africa – where 18 out of 53 Commonwealth countries are found – can Britain expect?

An article published on the LSE blog by academic Peg Murray-Evans makes the case that, contra to the desires of Commonwealth-fetishising Brexiteers, "there will likely be no reinvigoration of trade relations with Africa". The European Union, not Britain, is by far the largest market for African exporters, and throughout the past few decades Africa has been further integrated into free market deals with Europe that allow "unilateral duty free access to the EU market". (It's worth pointing out that others claim EU tariffs in general constitute a considerable barrier to African development.) Murray-Evans' point is that a post-Brexit Britain would basically need to go about reproducing the agreements it already has with Africa by virtue of being in the EU. Although some more ambitious and individualised trade agreements could be hashed out, this would take a lot of time, approval from the World Trade Organisation and is practically impossible given the "severe constraints on trade negotiation capacity after Brexit".

Well... if Africa, home to some of the fastest growing economies and markets in the world isn't looking good, then what about the jewel in the crown, India? The country suffered calamitous de-industrialisation under the Raj, but now under control of the right-wing BJP is fast-becoming a neoliberal paradise – surely the Indian elite would be happy to draw up deals with a "tax haven Britain"?

Again, it's unlikely. When Theresa May donned a sari and went on a trade delegation trip to India last November, Brexit put a question mark over everything. It's true that Indian companies "invest more in the UK than anywhere else in Europe", but the objective reality that underlines this relationship is, according to tycoon Lord Bilimoria, that "they see it as being a bridge to the EU". Now that the bridge has been well and truly burned, Indian-owned companies like Jaguar Land Rover have said they will "realign their thinking" on UK investments.

But Brexit isn't just a set of economic agreements. It's a cultural agreement between the government and the people, a nativist-turn against the Other, which has worried many in India too. Theresa May's crackdown on foreign students when she was home secretary was received poorly in India. Just last week, the Times of India reported that her refusal to relax visa restrictions for Indian students and skilled workers is putting any post-Brexit trade agreement at risk. A senior Indian official has been reported as saying, "We cannot separate free movement of people from the free flow of goods and services." Sound familiar? It's much the same as every European bureaucrat pointing out that Britain can't cherrypick its terms for accessing the single market.

For centuries Britain has repressed the truth about its Empire, obscuring the violence that allowed it to function. Brexit is bringing these truths to the fore. The post-imperial delusion of "old friendships" is going to shatter in the coming months, revealing a relationship of coercion that no longer holds. Britain is a bully going to a school reunion, only to find his victims now have better jobs and better lives than him. It needs to stand in the corner, alone, listening to the others dance to "Crazy Frog", and have a serious think about what it's done.

@YohannK

Previously:

Will Brexit Turn Britain Into a Corporate Tax Haven?

Theresa May's Fantasy Brexit 'Plan'

The Psychoactive Substances Act Is Mostly Helping London Police Arrest NOS Sellers

$
0
0

When the Psychoactive Substances Act came into force last May there was one question on the lips of everyone from Premier League footballers to campus shotters: what will become of our beloved balloons? Now, almost eight months on, new figures released to VICE under the Freedom of Information Act reveal that nitrous oxide is by far the main target of London police's efforts to clamp down on "new psychoactive substances".

For the uninitiated, the bill – introduced on the 26th of May – was overseen by then-Home Secretary Theresa May and banned an array of substances previously known as legal highs, including salvia, Spice and nitrous oxide, as well as potentially anything capable of "stimulating or depressing the person's central nervous system" and affecting "the person's mental functioning or emotional state". Crucially, though, only the supply, distribution, production and sale of the drugs were criminalised, meaning possession for personal use remained legal.

While some praised this aspect of the Act as a modern, Portuguese-style compromise, most criticised it as another moralising, unenforceable and poorly thought out piece of legislation. Whichever side you came down on, though, nobody really knew what the post-PSA landscape would look like, aside from the fact you'd no longer be able to buy the substances over the counter in high street head shops. And that first part happened quickly, with over 300 shops ceasing to sell legal highs inside three months of the ban. Now, new data released by the Metropolitan Police offers an insight into the first six months of the bill.

Between the 26th of May and the 30th of November last year, 160 people were detained by the Met under the Psychoactive Substances Act, equating to just under one arrest a day in London since the law was passed. The stats reveal that NoS has borne the brunt of the police crackdown, accounting for at least 114 – or 71 percent – of all arrests, in comparison to 33 for unspecified substances and 13 relating to synthetic cannabinoids like Spice.

So while there's no need to worry if you just plan on doing a couple of balloons, the consequences could be a little more serious if you're caught with a clinking sports bag full of canisters, shouting "doubles for £4". A seven-year prison sentence serious, in fact.

To make sense of the numbers I spoke to Danny Kushlick, founder of Bristol's Transform Drug Policy Foundation. "The intent of the Act was to stop the high street sale of the drugs, and it's done that," he said. "The question is: what are the unintended consequences? What's now happened is that people are being arrested for the sale of [nitrous oxide], a relatively benign substance, where they weren't before – and each of these cases is a travesty of justice."

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

WATCH: 'Spice Boys', our short documentary about young men in Manchester addicted to synthetic cannabinoids.

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

When I asked Danny about Spice, a synthetic cannabinoid currently causing chaos in Britain's prisons, and with links to psychosis, he was unconvinced that banning the substance would bring about long-term harm reduction. "We know that there's been a reduction in opportunistic purchases of new psychoactive substances, but overall have we gained in terms of social outcomes?" he asked. "If you look at the use of Spice in prison and among homeless people, the gains are really low."

According to Westminster councillor Nickie Aiken, speaking to the Guardian late last year, almost a quarter of the borough's street homeless use the drug and are being targeted by dealers selling Spice spliffs for as little as 50p. Meanwhile, the problems in UK prisons show no sign of slowing down. Which is no huge surprise: as anyone who's spent more than ten seconds looking into drug prohibition could have pointed out before the act came in, banning a substance simply pushes the trade underground rather than stopping people using it.

Responding to the figures, the Metropolitan Police said they were pleased with the progress made under the new legislation. "[It] has assisted greatly in reducing the availability and accessibility of many harmful substances to persons who were not aware of the associated dangers," a representative stated. "The powers provided by the act allow us to deal with persons who seek to profit from the trading of untested and dangerous products. It has also helped us to address anti-social behaviour driven by the consumption of such substances."

When asked about the amount of nitrous oxide-related arrests, the Met pointed to London's apparently still thriving party scene. "London hosts more festivals and carnivals than any other region within the United Kingdom. Nitrous oxide is a psychoactive substance and its use is strongly associated with the music/dance scene. It is of no surprise, therefore, that there were seizures throughout the busy festival period."

"Prohibition is primarily there to protect the government's reputation," said Kushlick. "That's what the closure of the head shops was about. The question is whether the government will shift its priorities to actually doing its job, which is looking after public health. If it doesn't do that it'll carry on producing lousy legislation which has lousy outcomes."

@JackHarry

More on VICE:

Why Were Devon and Cornwall Police Selling Laughing Gas On eBay?

2016 Was the Year the Tabloids Won the War on Drugs

Laugh a Minute: We Spent a Night with Sheffield's Busiest NOS Salesman

'There's No Perfect BJ Technique' – Realistic Sex Advice You Need to Know

$
0
0

(Top photo: Flickr user Michelle, via)

Over-consumption of crap sex advice has a tendency to make you feel like a well-trained circus animal, flipping nervously from position to position in the hope of a reward, mind skimming through your repertoire of tricks, eyes on your audience. Am I impressive? Am I doing this right? Will I get a round of applause?

But it doesn't have to be like this, says academic and psychotherapist Meg-John Barker and sex educator Justin Hancock, authors of Enjoy Sex: (How, when and if you want to): A Practical and Inclusive Guide, a new book that promises to contain not a single sex position.

VICE: Your book slates mainstream sex advice, suggesting that, by taking such a normative view, it actually creates the problems it claims to fix. Without naming anyone, can you give an example of terrible sex advice?
Meg John: What I noticed – after going through 62 sex advice books – is that the mainstream ones all assume that penis-in-vagina (PIV) sex is what sex is, so most books are about different positions for PIV. But the way people's sexuality works, I don't think a list of positions covers it.
Justin: And because we have such a narrow view of what "sex" means, almost half the population reports having a sexual difficulty, and 10 percent are distressed about their sex lives. That's because we have this very narrow idea which excludes anyone who isn't able to have what's seen as "normal" sex.

I was disappointed to hear there's no such thing as the perfect BJ technique. But you say the idea that there are failsafe activities which everyone enjoys is dangerous as it means we're less likely to ask for consent. An example of that would be the "surprise your partner" trope for spicing up your sex life. A bad idea, you reckon?
MJ: Oh god, I read a whole "surprise your partner" book. It was divided into "for him" and "for her". It suggested that as soon as your partner gets home you push them into a chair and tie them up, or drop to your knees and get their cock out. I mean, how easy is it for that to stray into non-consent? Like really easy!
J: It also perpetuates the idea that men like one thing and women like another. It's very 50 Shades – pretty much assuming that men are active and women are passive. There are so many myths in sex advice books: that women want love and men want sex. And actually, what a lot of this advice is saying is that women need to perform great sex or they'll lose their man.

Older people, or trans people, or people with disabilities are often talked about as special cases and given their own chapter, or own book, when it comes to sexuality. You make the point that everybody is different, physically, psychologically and socially.
MJ: What's really brought this up for me recently is all these trans documentaries that are saying "here's this tiny group of people who are trans; should we be letting them have all these special things they need?" And I'm like, to the documentary-makers, just make a programme about gender. Loads of cis people have surgeries – like labiaplasty, breast augmentation, breast reduction, facial surgery. Loads of cis people take hormones – hormone replacement therapy, the pill. If you want to make a documentary about people who make various decisions about how they express their gender, follow a diverse range. And it's same with the book, really. Rather than taking a normative body and representing it in a million different positions, and assuming it works in these particular ways, let's talk about the diversity of bodies. Even if you took a cis man and a cis woman who are young and white and don't have any disabilities, you'd still find a huge diversity in terms of how their bodies work and what they enjoy sexually.

(Photo: Robert Ashworth, via)

Your book has a really nuanced discussion of consent, and you talk about how being horny may only account for part of reason we have sex. People have sex for all kinds of reasons.
MJ: I like the idea that we're learning from people on the edges. If you think about kinksters, you might have a scene that's about one person dominating another and there's no PIV, maybe no genital touching, and you think, 'What are those two people getting out of it?' Well, they're getting a really different thing. They're getting the experience of submission, the feeling of being out of control and able to let go; and the other person is getting the experience of feeling powerful and calling the shots and being able to read their partner. Those are legitimate things to want to get out of sex. Acknowledging that we have sex for different reasons can take the pressure off the idea that everyone should orgasm. To use a more normative example, you might just be up for being next to your partner when they orgasm because that would make you feel really close to them.

The idea that people with a penis will always want to penetrate and people with vaginas will always want to be penetrated just isn't accurate. How could we start talking about this in schools?
J: I'm working on a project called dosreforschools.com, which MJ was an adviser on. We worked on the assumption that sex isn't just PIV. We're saying, "Here's how to find out what you enjoy and here's how to communicate that; here's how to make that safer; here's how you can practice self-care; here's how to negotiate that in relationships; and here's how to deal with all the messages we get from society." So we've kind of done a version of Enjoy Sex for schools.
MJ: You can teach consent from a very young age. It doesn't need to be taught specifically in relation to sex. The whole point is that everything should be consensual, not just sex.

So go on then, what's your top sex tip?
J: Learn to be present to everything that's happening, rather than going into it with some kind of end goal. If we constantly think that sex is like this ride we can't get off, that one thing inevitably leads to another, and that the goal is always PIV, then quite frankly we can be on the ride having rubbish sex and not even enjoying it. And being present – paying attention to what's going on with you and your partner – stands close to consent. We want to present the idea that "consent" and "enjoyable" are the same things.
MJ: I'm aware these tips don't sound very sexy, but I think that self-consent and being present to yourself is extremely sexy. What it's about is really letting yourself find sexy what you find sexy, asking yourself, 'What is it that really excites me?' rather than pretending it's this thing that you think is "proper" sex or "normal" sex.

@frankiemullin

Enjoy Sex: (How, when and if you want to): A Practical and Inclusive Guide is available now on Amazon.

All the Best Stuff You Missed This Week

$
0
0

Listen, you're busy – you've got things to do, places to be, plans to cancel with your friends by texting "so sorry!!!!! work crazy right now. another time? x" only to go home and watch an entire Archer season on Netflix – and as such you might have missed some of the juicier morsels from the extended VICE network this week. So, thankfully for you, we've curated a nice little list for you to spend the weekend catching up on. Save all these to your iPad and dive in:

Does Anyone Care That Camden's Dying?

The grotty alternative capital of London is being Shoreditchified, but it's not like anything good has happened there for decades.

Read on VICE.

We Asked the Experts to Predict the Biggest Music Trends of 2017

Meet the tastemakers and gurus who take a shit on boundaries, tequila-shot your perceptions and painfully birth the future.

Read on Noisey.

I Inaugurated My Uterus With an IUD Because Trump Is President

"While much of our health coverage is still in the hands of the state and our employers, anything can happen in four years. If I took the incoming president at his word, my safety net was in danger of disappearing."

Read on Motherboard.

Game Developers Speak Up in the Face of Obamacare Repeal

What will happen to the game industry when so many developers depend on the Affordable Care Act?

Read on Waypoint.

The People Who 'Sex Detox' to Help Them Fuck with Pure Hearts

There's nothing inherently bad about sex, but the societal shit that surrounds it can cause a lot of problems. The benefits of a period of abstinence include clarity, peace and a fruitful relationship with a vibrator.

Read on Broadly.

You Have No Idea How Much Butter It Takes to Make a Croissant

To say there is a lot of butter in croissants is not just an understatement, it's a complete misunderstanding of what a croissant is. "Croissant" is the name given to a shitload of butter, to which a small amount of pastry has been added and twisted into a crescent shape.

Read on Munchies.

In Fond Memory of the Greatest Football Vines

The looping video app, supposedly beloved by internet people everywhere, was terminated on behalf of general neglect and underuse. Lovers of Dapper Laughs, Brian Limond and animals doing the funniest things™ will be devastated, and football fans are gutted too.

Read on VICE Sports.

The Mothers and Daughters Who Marched on Washington Together

$
0
0

The day after Donald Trump—who was elected on a platform of divisiveness and bigotry—was inaugurated as president of the United States, millions of women and men throughout the country and the world gathered in protest. In Washington, DC, hundreds of thousands of protesters swarmed the streets; among them were women of all generations.

Among them were countless mothers who had brought their daughters, wanting to share the historical moment and ensure a better future for their children. Broadly has compiled quotes from some of the families in attendance on the significance of the march and the reasons they traveled to the capital.

Read the whole story on Broadly.

We Made Our Health Editor Eat Like Trump for a Week and She Felt Terrible

$
0
0

I am VICE's resident healthy person. As the editor in chief of the health vertical Tonic, I am on the receiving end of sheepish looks from my smoking coworkers (good lord why haven't you quit yet?) and sent questions about oral herpes (it's probably just a pimple but if it's actual herpes, chill—everyone has it). I have a healthy relationship with what I eat. I love food, and it loves me. Rarely a day goes by that I don't grace my digestive system with things green and fibrous, omega-3-rich, lousy with phytonutrients. My friends have labeled my proclivities "monastic." So when some of my coworkers cooked up the evil little idea that someone should eat like Donald Trump for a whole work week, I was the obvious person for the job.

So what does Trump eat? Mainly, he loves fast food chains because, he says, they can be counted on for their cleanliness. They have to hold themselves to "a certain standard," as he once told CNN. He's mentioned loving Burger King, KFC, and McDonald's. He also likes Popeye's Chicken and Biscuits, which I enjoy so much I served it at my wedding. So there was at least one thing we could agree on.

Every story about Trump's food intake indicates that he doesn't much care what he eats. "It's always whatever he is craving, which is more often than not McDonald's," is how one of his aides phrased it when talking to the New York Times. He loves the Filet of Fish, which he calls the "Fish Delight." Big Macs. Quarter pounders with cheese. He loves their fries. There is some dispute over whether or not he removes the buns from his burgers. When he eats pizza, he scrapes the toppings off and doesn't eat the dough, believing this saves him precious calories. Would you still call that "eating pizza"?

He drinks Diet Coke, and eats See's Candies. He loves cherry vanilla ice cream. (I hate cherry vanilla anything, haven't had any kind of soda since college, and the thought of See's makes my teeth hurt.) His least favorite meal is breakfast (my favorite), but if he eats it he has eggs, bacon or cornflakes, though the latter was something he said as a cheap ploy to get votes in Iowa. He is a diehard fan of meatloaf. He likes his steak so well done "it would rock on the plate," as his butler at Mar-a-Lago once famously said. He likes spaghetti with meat sauce.

Trump does not appear to eat fruits or vegetables. He does not drink alcohol. He also doesn't drink coffee or tea. These were the details that were truly alarming to me; I can say with confidence that I have never gone a week without these things.

I was going to spend five days walking in the shoes—walking with the stomach?—of the new president, learning what makes him burp, and maybe why he looks like that. I'd get to eat all the junk food I wanted, in the name of journalism. This was going to be fun. It was going to be the greatest, most incredible diet I had ever been on. Yuge. I was going to be yuge.

DAY ONE

10 AM

Channeling Trump's distaste for breakfast and dislike of planned meals, I spring for a bag of sour cream and onion potato chips from the office kitchen. They're fucking delicious; why had I not eaten these for breakfast before?

Lunch, Day One. A fried chicken sandwich.

2 PM

Since the Brooklyn VICE office is in a fast-food desert and I don't want to pay $47.50 for Postmates to deliver a $7 Popeye's meal, I Seamless a fried chicken sandwich from tried and true Williamsburg comfort food staple Pies n' Thighs. My cursor hovers over the side salad option, a little bit longingly, before I remember myself and click on the side of fries. I select "hold the bacon" and then unselect when I remember I should probably eat the bacon too. To reach the delivery minimum I add in an order of hush puppies; I'm vague on what those are but I figure channeling Trump means grabbing this diet by the puppy, so I order them.

Once the food arrives I scarf it down alongside a cold Diet Pepsi (the office kitchen is out of Diet Cokes and I figure the Pepsi will have the same ill effects on my metabolism and gut bacteria anyway, so cool). I'm shocked by how horrendous fake sugar tastes after years of not touching the stuff. I'm lightheaded almost instantly. Is this what power feels like?

8 PM

For dinner, Day One, a meat pile.

My friends, who are at my apartment for dinner, convince me that the sausage and pork-belly choucroute, a pile of meat that my husband made, is Trumpy as hell. So I agree to skip the trip to Taco Bell, with poor meal planning and impulsivity as my spirit animals.

DAY TWO

8 AM

OK so for some reason I feel intensely hungover this morning even though my friends drank last night and I abstained, true to Trump's ways. I'm queasy, and my brain feels like it's been slammed into submission by a meat tenderizer.

10 AM

For breakfast, Day Two, hush puppies

At work, I know I'm not supposed to have coffee but the brain fog is too much to bear. Cutting one little corner feels kind of right, kind of Donaldesque. When my coworker points out my cheat I tell him he's a nasty person.

Also: Hush puppies, leftover from yesterday, appear to be some kind of fried cornmeal that are great with coffee, even though the coffee turns out to do nothing for my fucked up meat-hangover brain. If Trump were to eat breakfast he would definitely eat hush puppies. He also wouldn't eat anything for the rest of the work day, because they sink like rocks.

8 PM

The first couple bites of my Popeye's dinner are tasty, redolent of Americana, something that seemed innocent enough only a few months ago. But then I hit some kind of wall and can't keep eating. I go to bed with the sweats, starting to doubt my hardiness.

DAY THREE

7 AM

I wake up from a dream in which I'm eating the most tantalizingly fragrant, juicy pear, to face the reality of another meaty day in Trump hell. I'm sluggish and spacey, and leave the house having forgotten to brush my teeth for the first time in my adult life. I get winded climbing the stairs to the subway. I hate life. I am loping and irritable. The fruit in the office kitchen is taunting me.

2 PM

The friend I'm supposed to have lunch with flatly refuses to join me at McDonald's, so I go bougie-junk again and order chicken and waffles at a local restaurant, figuring Trump would do this, take a picture of himself with it, and then claim to love black people. I'm not hungry at all; it's as though all the meat and grease have permanently stolen my appetite. So I grimace through the meal and practically cry over my lunch date's arugula salad, which looks so crisp and refreshing.

8 PM

I plan to go to the gym after work, since the rules didn't mention exercise, but instead I collapse on the couch, floored by my exhaustion. I rant at my husband, who is gleefully serving me leftover sausages from the other night. Mid-speech I realize this is precisely how Trump gets exercise—emphatic speaking is a workout, he feels—and now, schvitzing from the exertion, I understand that if you subsist on the Trump Diet, it is.

DAY FOUR

Noon

Every time I burp I get a mayonnaise-y Whopper taste and worry my coworkers can smell it. The words on my laptop screen have no meaning. I read and reread a story about psychedelic integration three times before giving up and sending some half-assed notes to the writer. I save all my emails as unread because I don't have the will to reply to any of them. I muddle my way through two meetings, barely keeping up with what we're talking about. The only thing I really have the mental strength for is social media, so I tap out a few work-related Tweets and call it a day. Huh.

8 PM

A burger cooked to Trump's liking, so well done "it rocks on the plate."

For dinner, at a Manhattan restaurant with friends who laugh off my Trump Grille suggestion, I order a burger well-done since there's no taco bowl on the menu. I can hardly gag the dry bites down my sad esophagus, and I don't hear much of the conversation over my furious internal monologue, which is mostly about whether the Trumpish authenticity of cheating would be canceled out by the inauthenticity of drinking a beer on the Trump Diet.

DAY FIVE

10 AM

Fuck this. Fuck fucking Trump. My husband delights in snapping photos as I barfily nibble at a McDonald's hash brown and an Egg McMuffin. We're on our way to my mom's in Massachusetts for Christmas, and all I want to do is cheat and then lie about it. I impulsively grab a grapefruit out of my husband's bag and sink my teeth into it like a feral animal (what? That's how you peel it). He raises an eyebrow at my transgression and I call him crooked. I spend the rest of the afternoon breaking the rules. "I heard you were on the Trump diet," my mom's partner says as I snack on a banana.

"That is a tremendous lie," I reply, explaining that there's a global conspiracy out to get me. "I never, ever said that."

6 PM

Holiday dinner, Trump style.

Over dinner, which is vegetable soup for everyone but me, I tell my family I'm seriously considering going vegetarian in 2017. As I chew my last bites of Fish Filet (gotta say, that bun is delightfully pillowy), I get some exercise (by pontificating, obvs): Sure, I've been put up to this, but my five days of Trump have served as an excuse for skipping the gym, my reason for being snippy, my justification for availing myself of irresponsibly raised meat. I can't resist the larger analogy: Trump had been an excuse for all my basest behaviors, just as his approaching presidency has inspired America's grossest recent acts of racism, misogyny, and xenophobia.

I now have the most visceral sense of this dark force, and also know that the sheen we often see on his orange brow is the fucking meat sweats. These five days have given me a focused taste of Trump—and of the next four years, and it makes me want to puke.

Follow Kate Lowenstein on Twitter.


Trump Officially Won't Release His Tax Returns So Now WikiLeaks Is After Them

$
0
0

Just three days after he was sworn in as president, White House counselor Kellyanne Conway has announced that Donald Trump will not be releasing his tax returns. In an ABC interview Sunday, Conway said: "People didn't care…They voted for him, and let me make this very clear: Most Americans…are very focused on what their tax returns will look like while President Trump is in office, not what his look like."

This latest announcement seems to have angered WikiLeaks. The whistleblowing site is now calling on people to help it publish the US president's tax returns.

WikiLeaks was largely viewed as an ally of Trump during his presidential run, given its publication of leaked Democratic emails which were hugely damaging to Hillary Clinton's campaign. Julian Assange has denied this, saying: "This is not due to a personal desire to influence the outcome of the election. The Democratic and Republican candidates have both expressed hostility towards whistleblowers."

However on Sunday, when the White House made the announcement that it would not be releasing Trump's tax returns—breaking with 40 years of precedent but not the law—the group made clear that they found this unacceptable.

Read more on VICE News

Is Romaphobia the Last 'Acceptable' Form of Racism?

$
0
0

(Top photo: Roma dancers in Romania, by Tare Gheorghe, via)

The Roma people were Europe's last legal slaves, still breaking their backs in the fields of Romanian landowners until the mid-19th century. Today, they may not be enslaved, but they are still ostracised, marginalised and impoverished: one in four European Roma live without piped water, and 90 percent live below the poverty line. Only 54 percent of Europeans would be happy to work with a Roma person, while far-right paramilitaries and armed mobs stalk them across Eastern Europe.

As they are expelled en masse from European countries like France, forced to live in poverty in camps, an attitude prevails that Roma are legitimate targets – that they are travellers by choice who have opted out of society and refused to integrate. In his book Romaphobia: The Last Acceptable Form of Racism, Dr Aidan McGarry, Principal Lecturer in Politics at the University of Brighton, asks how this came to be, and looks at how a younger generation of Roma are starting to fight back.

VICE: In your book Romaphobia you say Roma are stigmatised because they're seen as being opposed to our "modern values". What are these, and how are they excluded from them?
Aidan McGarry: Employment, education, civic life and the ability to pay taxes. Their culture is thought to undermine core European values like democracy, capitalism and neoliberalism. Roma are used by nation-builders to create ideas of solidarity and belonging for the majority at the expense of Roma themselves. They're constructed as a threat, a necessary aberration, supposedly undermining the values and principles the European nation holds so dear.

So European nations need an enemy to prove how progressive they themselves are?
In contemporary western Europe, it's generally Muslims. In eastern Europe it's Roma. For example, Hungary has been a totalitarian regime for a few years. The third largest party there, Jobbik, is a far-right group that bases its electoral support on vilifying Roma and equating them with criminality. The biggest recent change is the so-called "refugee crisis". Suddenly, Roma are no longer in the crosshairs: it's refugees. The Roma I know in Hungary do a lot of work with refugees, going down to the border and providing shelter and help. They face very similar issues.

Are there similarities between historic Romaphobia and the current anti-refugee mood in Europe?
In 2000, Roma leaders declared a Roma nation – a nation without a state. They don't want their own territory. Where would it be? They left India 1,000 years ago, arrived in Europe in the 14th century, and they've contributed so much and suffered hugely since then. There's 10 to 12 million of them, more than the population of Greece. Neo-Nazis helpfully suggest they should all go somewhere in Africa.

Now, most are settled across Eastern Europe, and those that move are simply migrating. Here in Brighton we have a lot of young Spanish people studying. Roma coming from Slovakia are just the same. They want the same things you and I want: they want their kid to be happy, a nice job in a good area, good friends and neighbours. Almost all Roma are EU citizens. By moving across borders they're performing their belonging to the European dream.

"When Nicolas Sarkozy's government started evicting Roma, there was a real sense of rage. French citizens were appalled. Press at the time drew comparisons to World War Two – are we really going to stand by and let this happen again?"

Does this hostility towards Roma expose the limits of this "European dream"?
If you're not able to move and work and access education freely, you are a second-class citizen. In 2010, Roma were getting deported from France in big numbers – thousands and thousands getting sent back to Romania and Bulgaria. This was targeting an ethnic group for special treatment – highly, highly illegal because of what happened in the Holocaust [an estimated 500,000 Roma were murdered by the Nazis] – when Nicolas Sarkozy's government started evicting Roma in large numbers, but many lacked the agency to do anything about it. There was a real sense of rage. The evictions were resisted by French citizens, who were appalled that this could happen in this day and age. Press at the time drew comparisons to World War Two – are we really going to stand by and let this happen again?

Was the opposition to those French evictions a moment like the Stonewall riots, when the LGBT community fought back against persecution? Did it inspire resistance to Romaphobia?
It's more about advocacy. Within the Roma movement there's a real drive to challenge misrepresentations and orthodoxies, and emphasise the voice of Roma themselves. This is very important in terms of long-term emancipation. Roma Pride [which started in 2011] is a part of that. At Bucharest Pride I met university students in T-shirts saying, "I'm Roma and I'm studying to become a doctor or a sociologist." It clearly styles itself on Gay Pride, but it's much more about reclaiming public space, showing you exist, you're visible, you belong.

Your book talks a lot about space, arguing that neoliberal political agendas see Roma as a surplus population to be evicted from valuable land, driving them into impoverished, ghettoised communities.
Originally Roma pursued professions which meant they weren't reliant on the state, like horse trading, scrap trading or training animals. Under communism, the Roma were forced to become sedentary: they were seen as a project proving communism was better than capitalism. Their position has deteriorated a lot since 1989 [and the fall of communism in Eastern Europe]. They're at the bottom of the heap in terms of literacy, teenage pregnancy, prison population, infant mortality… their life expectancy can be 20 years lower than their neighbours in the same town. There's mass unemployment, sometimes at virtually 100 percent.

Lunik IX, in Slovakia. Photo: Wikimedia.

What were the Roma communities you visited like?
Lunik IX, in Slovakia, is an abject, horrible place. There's 5,000 people sharing outdoor, communal taps, switched on for a couple of hours a day. It's –10°C now and there's no heating, so the walls are blackened as people build fires in their apartments and suffer respiratory illnesses. This is in Košice, the 2013 European City of Culture. These are EU citizens. If the state's not helping you tend to see people coalescing together, but in Lunik IX that wasn't there; there's no community organisations. It's the most desolate place I've ever been. Neighbouring communities build walls around it.

Šuto Orizari in Romania is the largest Roma settlement in the world. [The Skopje municipality has a population of 30,000 to 40,000]. Of course it has its own problems, but it has its own mayor, there's commerce, people felt invested: it's much more like a community, whereas Lunik IX felt like a place people were trying to get out of. So I don't want to caricature all Roma as dredging on the margins of society: many Roma have wonderfully mundane lives. My book seeks to understand why Romaphobia exists, the role of the state in bringing it about and how it can be challenged.

'Romaphobia: the last acceptable form of racism' is being published by Zed Books in February of 2017, and is available to pre-order here . Aidan McGarry is a principal lecturer in politics at the University of Brighton.

The VICE Morning Bulletin

$
0
0

Everything you need to know about the world this morning, curated by VICE.

US News

Ethics Group Launches First Major Lawsuit Against President Trump
A group of prominent ethics lawyers were set to file a lawsuit against President Trump this morning, accusing him of violating a clause in the Constitution that forbids accepting payments from foreign powers. The suit by Citizens for Responsibility and Ethics in Washington, or CREW, will ask a federal judge to order Trump's hotels, golf courses, and other businesses to stop taking payments from foreign governments, citing the Emoluments Clause.—The New York Times

At Least 19 Dead as Tornadoes Devastate Southern United States
19 people have been killed in violent storms sweeping across states in the southeast US in the past 48 hours. At least 15 died in Georgia when tornadoes hit the state early Sunday morning, and at least 23 others were injured. At least four died in the Hattiesburg area of Mississippi when tornadoes struck on Saturday.—ABC News

Trump Moves to Renegotiate NAFTA with Canada and Mexico
President Trump on Sunday said he has organized talks with the leaders of Canada and Mexico aimed at renegotiating the North American Free Trade Agreement (NAFTA). Trump set meetings with Prime Minister Justin Trudeau and President Enrique Peña Nieto, with the White House confirming he will meet Nieto on January 31.—CNN

Two in Custody After San Antonio Mall Shooting
A mall robbery in San Antonio, Texas, on Sunday left one dead and two in custody. Several others were wounded as robbery suspects fled a Kay Jewelers store. Police Chief William McManus described it as a robbery "gone really, really bad." The two suspects face preliminary charges of capital murder and aggravated assault with a deadly weapon.—CBS News

International News

Syria Peace Talks to Begin in Kazakhstan
Syria peace talks brokered by Russia and Turkey were set to begin in the Kazakhstan capital of Astana today, but faced doubt after it became clear the two sides would speak only via intermediary, rather than face-to-face. Both the Syrian government and the rebel opposition delegation have at least claimed they would like to focus on bolstering ceasefire agreements.—Al Jazeera

Exiled Ex-Leader Accused of Stealing $11 Million in Gambia
More than $11 million has been reproted missing from state funds after Gambia's former leader Yahya Jammeh fled the country, according to an advisor to the new president. Jammeh reportedly flew to Equatorial Guinea on Saturday after West African leaders persuaded him to give up power. Mai Ahmad Fatty, advisor to new President Adama Barrow, says $11 million had been withdrawn in the past two weeks.—BBC News

Netanyahu Lifts Restrictions on Settlement-Building in East Jerusalem
Israeli PM Benjamin Netanyahu said he is removing restrictions on the building of settlements in East Jerusalem, an area Palestinians consider part of their own potential state. "We can build where we want and as much as we want," Netanyahu reportedly told senior ministers..—Reuters

German Police Arrest 21-Year-Old Terror Suspect
A 21-year-old man has been arrested by German police in the city of Neuss on suspicion of planning a terrorist attack. The man is suspected of plotting bomb attacks on Germany's armed forces, possibly in collaboration with an Austrian teenager who was detained in Vienna on Friday.—Deutsche Welle

Everything Else

Madonna Insists She Does Not Promote Violence
Madonna has clarified her speech at the Women's March in Washington, DC, after the singer referred to thoughts of "blowing up the White House." Insisting she was taken out of context, Madonna explained: "I am not a violent person, I do not promote violence."—Rolling Stone

WikiLeaks Wants to Publish President Trump's Tax Returns
WikiLeaks has called on someone—anyone—to leak President Trump's tax returns after advisor Kellyanne Conway made clear they would not be released despite his inauguration. The group said Trump's refusal to disclose was "even more gratuitous than Clinton concealing her Goldman Sachs speech transcripts."—VICE News

Battery at Fault for Galaxy Note 7 Problems, Says Samsung
Samsung says battery issues were to blame for the overheating problems that led to the recall of millions of Galaxy Note 7 phones. A company investigation revealed the battery's casing was apparently too small.—The Guardian

M.I.A. Releases Alternative Version of Track 'A.M.P'
M.I.A. has released an alternative version of her track "A.M.P (All My People)." She said the version had been requested by fans. "Don't be a dick and remove it," she appealed on Twitter, referring to her record label.—Noisey

Dallas Stars Troll Trump with Wild Attendance Figure
The Dallas Stars trolled President Trump and his press secretary by flashing a wild attendance count on the scoreboard for the NHL game against the Washington Capitals. An estimated attendance of 1.5 million appeared on the Jumbotron.—VICE Sports

Drone Programmed to Do Anti-Trump Graffiti
Graffiti artist KATSU has programmed a DJI quadcopter drone to use its articulating arm to spray anti-Trump messages. Asked if it was difficult to program, the artist said: "Not as difficult as stomaching Trump as the president of the United States."—Motherboard

The Women’s March Proves Solidarity Can’t Exist in a Bubble

$
0
0

Early Saturday I was standing knee deep in snow, listening in awe as The Daily Show's Jessica Williams gave one of the most powerful speeches of the morning, at the Park City Women's March at Sundance. She recounted an emotional story about getting average grades in high school one semester and having her mother tell her in no uncertain terms that as a black woman she could never afford to "be average." There was a particular irony in hearing that story in front of thousands of wealthy/middle-class white women. But the most important part of her speech came at the end when Williams, shortly after shouting out "Black Lives Matter," noted that she was proud to stand with all the women that morning and hoped that when she needed these women to stand with her, she could expect the same turnout. It's a sentiment I've been thinking about since the March on Washington and its many, and successful sister marches around the world.

There's no question that seeing that many women gathered together in solidarity, marching for their daughters, mothers, sisters and friends, was powerful. I spent the morning slightly detached because I was there to work, but I gave into my emotions talking to other women, allowing myself to tear up alongside them because there is nothing more important than expressing our humanity together. Protests are not new for me, I've been marching since I was a child, from Take Back the Night vigils to anti-war demonstrations, and I believe completely in the power of public unity. But since the announcement of the Women's March I have been asking myself why I couldn't quite see myself there. The historical absence of women of colour from the frontlines of the feminist movement have kept many of us from participating actively in what can often seem like exclusionary politics. It's hard to reconcile the notion of solidarity of all women against this president when we know that 53 percent of white women voters cast their ballot for Donald Trump. Though this march had the promise of unity, after looking at the many Instagrams and media coverage from the weekend, I'm still left feeling like we're being excluded from the conversation.

Protestors hold up signs at the Women's March in Toronto. Photo by Jake Kivanc

And it's not because we physically weren't there—I know many women of colour who attended across North America. But the face of this movement, in many cases the only voices of this movement, have been middle-class, able-bodied white women whose echo chamber grew to millions on Saturday. And in the end it still feels like they're just talking to each other. Intersectionality was mentioned, but the images of the overwhelmingly white frontlines and the "pussy power" chants quickly proved that, for now, intersectionality is a lovely buzzword that lets you feel better about your pink hat. Jessica Valenti, a Guardian columnist and founder of Feministing, posted, then deleted a very telling tweet that pointed out there were no arrests on Saturday, ignoring the racialized police response at most demonstrations. It was a glaring blindspot, but one that she shares with many women whose political action is usually relegated to 140 characters. In Vancouver, the Women's March didn't even bother to contact the local Black Lives Matter chapter.  

It's not a surprise that Jessica Williams feels compelled to ask the women present on Saturday to stand with her next time there is a Black Lives Matter protest, because they have historically not shown up in the past. While the Women's March on Washington felt like the beginning of a movement for many, the undercurrents of resistance have been alive and well in Ferguson, Flint, North Dakota, and North Carolina to name just a few. So do we really stand in solidarity? I was given a bit of an answer to that question the afternoon before at another, less visible demonstration in Park City.

On Friday afternoon, frontline Indigenous leaders who continue to fight for clean water in North Dakota took to historic Main Street with NoDAPL signs.

Protestors at the Park City Women's March at Sundance (photo by the author)

Despite declaring victory at Standing Rock in December, the reality on the ground is far from celebratory. I spoke with activists whose friends had been hit at close range with rubber bullets just days earlier. Bobbi Jean Three Legs, from the Oceti Sakowin camp in North Dakota, was front and centre at Friday's protest and has been battling the pipeline since the beginning. Her declaration about the status of the fight was much clearer. "It's not over," she told me.

There was a lot of celebrity presence at Standing Rock, actor Shailene Woodley even spent an afternoon in jail. There was no such presence here on Main Street this past weekend. Dozens of protesters walked up the festival's hub calling for support and other than a few curious photo-takers and some grumbling about blocking the sidewalk, they ended their march with the same numbers as they started with. There was no solidarity that afternoon. Curiously though, Shailene Woodley is scheduled to speak at a sold out "Standing Rock" meets Sundance event Monday afternoon. None of the Indigenous women from Friday's protest are on the bill.

What happened on Saturday was important and it was powerful. But it can't happen in a bubble. What will be inconvenient for the majority of the marchers for the next four years, will be life-threatening for black, brown, and trans women. If our activism happens in an echo chamber, however large, if we erase the people we're "fighting for" from the fight, then we risk repeating the mistakes of the people we're marching against. We stood with you on Saturday, will you stand with us today?

Follow Amil Niazi on Twitter.

The Plan to Test Cities’ Sewage for Drugs Is a New Form of Mass Surveillance

$
0
0

Nearly every drug you snort, inject, smoke, butt-plug, vaporize or freebase eventually ends up back in the water supply via your excrement. The fish love it—well, maybe not the ones mutating from it. But apparently crabs and trout aren't the only ones sifting through your waste.

Across the globe, researchers at wastewater treatment plants are testing for psychoactive substances passed by drug users through their feces and urine. The data can be incredibly valuable, letting scientists and law enforcement quickly track drug use trends and identify new substances on the market. It can also measure the impact of drug policy strategies, even highlight which days of the week drug use spikes (cocaine on the weekends, anyone?).

But with this research comes some ethical entanglements. Testing waste could help anticipate the sharp rise in carfentanil or fentanyl overdoses, for example, by detecting the drug in sewage. But the same strategies can be used to stigmatize against certain populations, and as we've seen with the War on Drugs in the US, this could have lasting consequences for those communities.

Read more on Motherboard

How Hip-Hop Connected the Iranian Diaspora and Taught Me to Swear in Farsi

$
0
0

The early 2000s were a vastly important time for cultural events: Michael Jackson died, YouTube and the iPod were founded, reality television became a thing, and Top of the Pops aired its final episode. And, at the same time in Iran, a significant underground music movement was beginning to blossom: Persian hip hop.

What started as a few Tehran based young artists imitating US hip hop—first rapping in English, then rapping in Farsi over US beats—eventually moved on to creating their own tracks and spitting in Farsi. For teenagers who lived in Iran, and for those who made up part of the roughly 80,000-deep Iranian diaspora in the UK, this phenomenon was massive. And for me, the genre gave me a deeper grasp of my mother tongue, even if only in the sense that I learned how to call someone a ho and talk about the universal phenomenon that is coke dick.

The two front-runners of the scene were arguably Hichkas, often called the Godfather of Iranian rap, and a group named Zedbazi, which formed in 2002. Hichkas combined hip-hop with elements from classical Iranian music: lyrically, he focused on social issues in Iran, steeped in nationalist tradition – and while his flow sounded aggressive, he avoided profanity. Zedbazi took the opposite approach and pioneered Iranian gangsta rap; becoming the first in a wave of musicians to swear and explicitly rap about sex and drugs, quickly achieving huge popularity among Iran's exceptionally young population (60 percent of the nation are thought to be under 30).

"Hip-hop is without a doubt the most popular genre for the young generation in Iran," says Mahdyar, Persian hip-hop's first and most iconic producer, speaking to me from Paris. "If you're out on the street you don't hear rock, you don't hear electronic—you hear hip-hop and pop—it's the biggest genre that's been created by the post-revolution generation."

Read more on Noisey

On Being Blocked by Donald Trump on Twitter, and Disbelief

$
0
0

I had nothing but bosses. There was no one in the office who did not outrank me, or deserve it; I did not even know what my job even was, really, beyond picking up food from a nearby restaurant and then walking it back to the office for some of my bosses to enjoy in meetings with other people who were probably also my bosses. Occasionally the bosses would give me screenplays to read, some of them already in production and some of them clearly never ever ever destined to be produced, and I would write a "coverage." This was basically a memo to my bosses, telling them either "I, someone whose entire salary amounts to whatever bagels are left over and gasoline reimbursements, kind of dug this screenplay" or "this Die Hard But Also It's On A Large Hot-Air Balloon Now screenplay does not really deliver on that promising concept." Otherwise I sat wherever there was space, waiting to be given a task and periodically checking to see if there were leftover bagels. I was doing that when one of my many bosses found me. There was something he wanted me to watch.

I was joined in a room by the other people who had only bosses. We were shown an early trailer for a film that the production company would be releasing months later; this was the first version, and unfinished. The idea, I guess, was to show it to a bunch of young white people who did not have anything more important to do, presumably because those people were the target audience for that film, and also for all other films. A boss turned the light off, and another boss pressed play, and a screen lit up with the trailer for a movie called End Of Days, which starred Arnold Schwarzenegger as a hard-bitten atheist cop named Jericho Cane. It was set in the last days of 1999, and had to do with the apocalypse. Gabriel Byrne played Satan.

Read more on VICE Sports


Sundance 2017, Day Two: The Search for Feel-Good Entertainment

$
0
0

I watched the 45th president of the United States take the oath of office in the lobby of a Hampton Inn & Suites some 7 miles outside Park City. It's not how I envisioned my Inauguration Day going—I had visions of weeping over Bloody Marys in some overcrowded brewpub, publicists and journalists hugging and consoling one another in the middle of Main Street as the snow fell poetically around us. Instead it was among six or so other guests who, having just finished their complimentary waffle breakfast, gazed up at the TV with amused smiles plastered across their faces. I don't presume to know their political affiliations, but the ability to smile, even sardonically, was beyond me at that moment. The first thing I did in Trump's America was take a banana from the breakfast bar and call an Uber.

Inauguration Day at Sundance was one of the most boring days I've ever experienced at this festival. Day Two is usually when the flood of people truly descends, jamming traffic and filling up every available seat at the restaurants, but the overpriced sushi restaurant on Main that I stopped at for lunch was strangely deserted. (This was puzzling, because as my newly single Uber driver had informed me the night before, "Everyone on Tinder in Park City lists two interests: the outdoors and sushi.") I attended a SundanceTV panel about protest and patriotism hours after the inauguration that felt muted and lacking in candor despite the timing and subject matter. I passed by Jason Segel on my way to my next venue; he was looking at the ground and scowling, like pretty much everyone else. This might have been an emotional reaction to the day's events, but it also was snowing heavily all day, which has the same effect on one's face.

You had to feel a little bad for any Sundance film having its premiere on Friday. I wasn't in the room for the first screening of Dustin Guy Defa's Person to Person, but I caught a pre-festival screening, and I can't imagine it felt like much of anything. A shambling, grainy New York set ensemble piece that recalls Cassavetes with none of the peaks (you can now fill in your "recalls Cassavetes" square in Sundance Bingo) it has an unfortunate "welp, better use up this film stock" vibe to it. Its ensemble is Sundance-perfect (Michael Cera, Tavi Gevinson, Philip Baker Hall, and Abbi Jacobson, who is the runaway best of the bunch) and wants to charm you hard with its old-school, jazz-scored, ultimately feather-light feel. But Defa, who has been making well-received short films for more than a decade, doesn't quite rise to the demands of the feature format, stringing together a few short-film-scale stories that don't seem to really speak to one another, much less pay off.

The relentlessness of the snowstorm and the abundance of dramedies about life in New York were running into a numbing blur, blinding me with whiteness. Meanwhile, on the other side of the country, someone punched Richard Spencer in the face.

Because I failed to get into the overbooked premiere of Gillian Robespierre's Obvious Child follow-up Landline, I had two hours to burn, during which time I caught up with everything happening in Washington. All jokes aside, I was really starting to wonder: Was a 45-second clip of an alt-right asshole getting a fist in his mouth really going to be the most invigorating moment of my filmgoing day? It was close, but as it turns out, that honor would go to Holly Hunter, launching herself at a racist frat boy in The Big Sick.

The Big Sick was directed by The State alum Michael Showalter and written by Silicon Valley's Kumail Najiani and his wife and frequent collaborator, Emily V. Gordon, and it appears to be a more or less faithful adaptation of an early chapter in their relationship. (Gordon detailed the circumstances that the movie covers in this piece for Lenny Letter; it could be considered a spoiler.) It follows Kumail, a stand-up comedian/Uber driver, and Emily, a psychology grad student, who embark on a slowly blossoming romance despite the hurdles of their cultural differences. It sounds like a tired premise, but it's sold by the specificity and warmth of the script, and Showalter's now signature empathetic comedic direction, which lets characters be both ridiculous and fully human, by turns and often simultaneously.

The film takes a big left turn around halfway through, and Kumail ends up spending a lot of bonding time with Emily's parents, played wonderfully by Ray Romano and the aforementioned Hunter. All of these people feel knowable, and their relationships are constantly in a state of evolution. It makes a strong case for the autobiographical narrative film, a genre I'm usually not a fan of, if only because Nanjiani and Gordon are so clearly tapped in to what makes the people in their lives special and funny. The transition from the script to the direction appears to be seamless.

When Hunter lunges at that frat boy, it's in defense of Kumail—the bro's racist heckling interrupts Kumail's stand-up set. It's a moment of release for Hunter's character, who's been pinched and dazed and deeply sad up until that point. I wanted it to represent a shift in my festival experience as well—at the end of a long day, I'd gone and let the feel-good comedy make me feel good. There was nothing escapist about it; I left wanting to root for the people who made this film and all they represent. In what already is starting to feel like a down year for the festival, one has to hang onto those experiences for all they're worth.

Follow Emily Yoshida on Twitter .

Hundreds of Sick Toronto College Students Are Vomiting, Shitting Their Brains Out

$
0
0

A suspected norovirus outbreak at a college residence building in Toronto has left hundreds of students sick with symptoms of vomiting, digestive issues, and severe abdominal pain, reports say.

According to an official news release from Humber College, the campus will remain open while Toronto Public Health (TPH) investigates the source of an outbreak that has left approximately 215 students sick in its North Campus student residence building since Thursday.

The cause of the outbreak has not yet been determined, according to CBC, but TPH officials are looking at everything from a norovirus outbreak to a case of mass food contamination, which could have been spread through one of the school's eateries. Neither scenarios have been ruled out.

While symptoms of both ailments are similar—vomiting, abdominal cramping,diarrhea, fever, etc.—the distinction is that norovirus is a viral infection, and is much more elusive than typical food-based bacteria like E. coli. Instead, norovirus is transmitted when microscopic pieces of vomit or fecal matter of a person infected with the virus reaches food, or an object/surface that would allow the virus to reach the mouth of another person.

The US Centers for Disease Control and Prevention's (CDC) guide to getting norovirus.

Initial cases saw 70 students from the North Campus residence report extreme abdominal pain and vomiting. Since then, 135 more have reported feeling sick, 55 students have been to the emergency room, and one has been hospitalized. That person has since been released.

Recommendations have been made by the school as to how to prevent further contamination, as well as for students who are already sick. According to a note published Sunday, students who feel at all ill are to stay away from school and seek medical help, and those that are ill or have recovered are recommended to still avoid campus for at least 48 hours.

"We encourage all our students and faculty to make the best decisions for them in terms of their attendance to campus. But if there are students who are away from class because they have been unwell or they are isolating themselves after feeling better, we'll make sure they don't see any academic disadvantage because of that," Jen McMillen, dean of Humber College, told CBC.

Video of students being led into a nearby hospital by authorities was captured by CTV, and shows some students throwing up into bags and holding their abdomens as they stumble into an emergency room.

Follow Jake Kivanc on Twitter.

Lead image via Flickr.

Disney Just Unveiled the Title of the Next Star Wars Movie

$
0
0

Strap into your X-Wing, call up your Wookie friends, and try not to step on BB-8: the title of the next installment in the main timeline of the Star Wars franchise has been revealed on StarWars.com, and if you saw The Force Awakens, it'll make a ton of sense.

Episode VIII will be called Star Wars: The Last Jedi and will see release on December 15, 2017—nearly two years after The Force Awakens came out. Considering we had to wait three years between 1999's The Phantom Menace and 2002's Attack of the Clones, that's not bad turnaround time.

While J.J. Abrams was behind the camera for The Force Awakens, the writer and director of The Last Jedi is none other than Rian Johnson, the onetime indie wünderkind who first broke out on the scene with 2005's moody high-school noir flick Brick.

Between then and now, Johnson's helmed the 2008 lyrical heist film The Brothers Bloom and 2012's trippy, blood-soaked sci-fi actioner Looper. He also directed several episodes of Breaking Bad, including one of the series' finest moments, "Ozymandias." Obviously, Rian Johnson's got the juice, and given that he's previously mixed grit with a sense of wonder in a satisfying way, we very may well be in for a treat.

Follow Larry Fitzmaurice on Twitter.

Why the Rest of the World Cares So Much About American Politics

$
0
0

All photos from protests in London against Trump's inauguration on Friday by Chris Bethell

This post originally appeared on VICE UK.

An estimated 2 million people across the globe took to the streets this weekend for the women's marches in opposition to the Trump presidency. It was a compelling example of America's enduring importance on the world stage: Donald Trump is not the only bad dude with a terrifying fighting force at his disposal, but as president of a country that remains—just about—the most powerful and influential in the world, his election really matters.

America—still the world's imperial power, still the driver of a largely anodyne global culture dominated by big brands, pop behemoths, and Hollywood—continues to hold the world's attention more than any other nation. During the inauguration last Friday, the BBC flashed through headline news reports from around the world: Trump was the top story everywhere.

This fixation on the US isn't always helpful. Across the world, we may find ourselves knowing more about President Trump than we do about what our local government is doing. In Britain, it may well have done us all some good to have known a little bit about the history and function of the European Union, to better understand how decisions made in Brussels actually affected us—but for reasons of language, culture, and history, we have always tended to look to the US.

This is an attitude that sits at the heart of government in Britain. Theresa May becomes the first foreign leader to meet with Trump in person, later this week. It seems as though, no matter who the American president is, Britain will be there to play lapdog, to help with the drone strikes, free trade deals, and rendition sites. "Every time I wrap up a meeting at the British foreign office," a Syrian negotiator told me recently, "they tell me they'll speak to the Americans then get back to me."

Simon Tate, author of A Special Relationship? British Foreign Policy in the Era of American Hegemony, tells me that it is important to remember Cold War history here: "The rest of the world was rightly interested in US elections as the US provided the security guarantee for the West. Lives depended on the words the president said and what he did."

Today, Tate says, being worried about what the American president does—particularly when that president is President Trump—is a key part of why people seem to care more about American politics than the politics of other nations or regions: "Will Trump withdraw the US from NATO? What will he do about ISIS and climate change? Will there be a post-Brexit Anglo American trade deal? His answers these questions will affect us all."

Tate also points out that the eyes of the world are fixed on American politics right now because of how "the non-Western parts of the world—and much of the Western world—now think about America not as Uncle Sam, but as egotistical, materialistic, bombastic, arrogant, imperialistic, and racist. In their minds, Trump personifies that caricature of the US and reinforces it, which is a problem for the US in terms of its global standing and global relations."

A Trump effigy

Vijay Prashad, an Indian historian, journalist, and professor at Trinity College in Connecticut, adds that "there is also the realization that the US—with its vast military footprint—has an impact on matters elsewhere. So too on US decisions on trade… China, India, Brazil, South Africa—all must relish the thought of the suicide of the Western Bloc."

As Washington's intelligence community howled about Russian interference in the American election, the rest of the world remembered the countless elections America has seen fit to meddle in, often with disastrous, tragic, and ongoing consequences. In this way, too, what happens in America is important for the rest of the world.

Away from geo-politics, there is the circus. In the last year, American politics has turned into the greatest, darkest show on Earth, with Trump the largest, angriest bear turning increasingly bizarre and dangerous tricks, his audience recoiling but unable to look away. Trump, the brand, the reality TV star, the tweeter, the divisive, outrageous rabble-rouser, has turned American politics into even more of a reality TV show than it was before. Even people who hate him can't help but give him airtime—and now that he's president, he gets airtime whether we like it or not.

The US Embassy in London

"There's something about US politics at the moment which makes it weirdly hypnotic, even if you aren't that interested in politics," says Tate. "In part, it's the expectation of waiting for Trump's next gaffe, outrageous comment, or revelation—like when you get a bad contestant on The X Factor or Britain's Got Talent, you know it's going to end in some sort of disaster, but you still want to watch it. And given the really important issues in Trump's inbox, that's a tragedy, really."

Vijay Prashad agrees that "there is a desperate fascination with the US elections and the new president," but points out that there is more to it than that. "Recall the great prevalence of the US media," he says, "which frames stories not only on what should matter—TRUMP—but also on how to understand conflicts Syria, for instance." The American media, with its resources and reach, can fill the world's screens with its programming.

Yes, we should all know more about what is happening in our own country and in the rest of the world, but with President Trump in power, knowing as much as we can about American politics is certainly worthwhile.

Follow Oscar Rickett on Twitter.

Vancouver Dirt Now Earns Twice as Much as All of the City’s Workers Combined

$
0
0

Not that deep down, renters in Vancouver know we've been given a raw deal. The city has once again been ranked third least affordable in the world—behind Hong Kong and Sydney, Australia—which means the average cost of housing is way beyond average income.

What we don't usually get is a clear sense of the scale of this gap—especially when it comes to the massive fortunes being made in the process.

Data analyst Jens von Bergmann is at least making an effort, and the results are equal parts absurd and enraging. His latest breakdown of land values found that dirt in Vancouver earned twice as much as all of the city's working humans combined.

This isn't the first time Jens has run these numbers. Last year, Jens added up the accumulated land value of all the city's single detached homes between 2015 and 2016. This excludes the value of any buildings—so you could essentially call it the total annual earnings of about 80,000 patches of dirt.

"It came out to a huge number," he recalled to VICE. (At the time it was $24 billion.) "I looked for a comparable one, and it turned out to be just slightly more than the entire income of the population of the city of Vancouver." In other words, no amount of shifts at your local coffee shop would have made you as wealthy as signed papers and land.

But that was last year. In 2017, new numbers from the BC housing assessment office show something even worse. It turns out those same patches of dirt managed to earn twice as much as working humans the following year, a cool $46.7 billion all told.

"The comparison doesn't work that well anymore, because now it's about double," Jens told VICE. "So single family home land values in the city of Vancouver went up twice as much as the amount of money the entire population brought home working."

Read More: How Foreign Investors Are Using Drug Cartel Tactics in the Canadian Real Estate Market

According to Jens, it's becoming harder and harder to illustrate how out-of-proportion Vancouver's freakshow real estate bubble has become. Over the last decade, the city has seen the most housing market deterioration out of any city in the world. An average property made $239 per hour, up from $126 the previous year. (That's more than twenty times the minimum wage, for those keeping score.)

Jens has tried a few new methods to give a sense of scale to the ridiculous, unfathomable numbers, with varied success. He recently decided to find out which lots accumulated over a million in wealth just by virtue of being located in Vancouver. Looking only at the land—who cares about the inside parts where the people go, tbh—about 10,000 houses cleared this line.

"Clearly it was an extraordinary year," he said—something we probably won't see repeated in 2017. Since the numbers run from July to July, Jens' calculations don't account for the tax on foreign investors that was brought in later in the summer, or the slight dip in prices that finally came in the winter.

Even with the beginnings of a correction, Jens says that barely makes a dent in the "extreme growth" of the last two years.

"Last year it was mostly single family homes that picked up tremendously, with condos gaining only half that rate. This time was different—condos appreciated at almost the same rate as single family homes."

"I found that amazing," he said, "it really highlights the pressures the housing market is facing."

"I'm just trying to highlight how extreme things have gone," he told VICE. "Maybe it's time to go beyond the small steps that have been taken."

Follow Sarah on Twitter.

Viewing all 38002 articles
Browse latest View live




Latest Images