Quantcast
Channel: VICE CA
Viewing all 38002 articles
Browse latest View live

Why the Fuck Do the British Love Boat Racing?

$
0
0

At 12:30 PM on Easter Sunday, a block away from the starting line of the annual Oxford-Cambridge Boat Race, John Bevan pulls a tallboy of Fosters from the pocket of his jean jacket. Standing outside a pub on the north bank of the Thames, he discreetly pours the beer he's brought from home into a plastic cup. In a few hours, the women's and men's rowing squads from Oxford and Cambridge will tear past him. He eyes a 50-something-year-old man in his "best gear"—a shirt and tie, tight-fitting blue blazer, and pink, pastel chinos—as he waltzes past the pub.

"Best gear" guy, Bevan explains, is one of countless diehard Oxford or Cambridge alums at the race who's chosen to establish the fact that he's got a good reason to be here, by dressing like a jabroni. Bevan won't watch the race. He, like a majority of the 250,000 people who will eventually line both sides of the Thames today, is here to get drunk.

"They look down on us," Bevan says, nodding toward the man.

John Eagen, a young, bearded guy in a flannel shirt, smokes a cigarette and shrugs. "I'm not interested in anything the alums are interested in," he says. "And they're probably not interested in what I'm into. So there's no point in trying to find a common ground. Because you're not going to find one."

One of the Johns calls the pink-pants guy a "complete wench"—the most British insult I've ever heard. Fifteen minutes into my first time at the boat race, and three months into my first trip to London, I think I've figured out something big. Since the first race in 1829, a handful of posh boys have insisted on sticking to themselves while the rest of the city gets wasted somewhere else. Two worlds coexist, but don't collide. Like John number two says, there's no common ground. The boat race is a sort of microcosm of London itself: fragmented, stratified, defined by class. Right?

Abso-fucking-lutely wrong.

After a brief tour of the enticingly advertised but bleak "Boat Race in the Park Festival"—it's raining, I'm not allowed to ride the merry-go-round, and it's a muddy wasteland—I stumble into one of the many pubs along the portion of the Thames home to the boat race. And here I begin to change my mind about the iron divide between the Oxbridge crew—your British version of Ivy Leaguers—and us lowly plebs.

The Crabtree is packed wall-to-wall. Young pros in Oxford jackets and scarves stand shoulder to shoulder with greasy people like me, and everyone chain smokes cigs and eats cheap sausage rolls. It is, quite simply, fucking awesome. There's no weird class tension, no difficulty getting along with the jabronis, who in reality seem to care just as little about the actual race as we do.

I ask Allister Hudson-Kirkham, a kid in a dark blue suit jacket with two friends rowing today, why the boat race is such a big deal.

He pauses for a moment.

"Excuse for the blokes to get pissed," he says, and sips his beer.

I work my way toward Hammersmith, and shuffle into the Fulham Reach Boat Club, a rowing program run by an inordinately friendly dude named Steven O'Connor. He and a friend change my day drastically: They manage to make me care about the actual race.

"In a football team, you can have one star player that'll take the ball, run, and score, and the team wins," O'Connor says. "But in a rowing boat, if one person decides, 'Right, I'm gonna really go for it,' and goes on his own rhythm out of time with the rest of the group, the boat will stop dead in the water, and you'll lose the race. So it's the only sport where everybody in the crew has to be inch-perfect with one another."

I walk down the south bank to the Blue Anchor pub, and hop onto a rowing machine to see what the sport—or, at least, my weaker version of it—is really like. Sitting in the sliding seat, holding what the Brits call an "oar," I'm told I have 16 seconds to cover 300 cyber-meters.

I fall off the seat three, maybe four times. Apparently I'm not using my legs at all? Enough? I can't tell. The woman who helped strap my feet in is yelling at me, as are dozens of people surrounding the machine, and now I fall off again. And then, 25 seconds later, it's over. Like that.

I walk farther down the riverbank to watch the last race of the day. The big event. Eight massive dudes (and one tiny dude, the cox, who screams at his rowers to keep their strokes in sync) float on the freezing, choppy waters of the Thames in 60-foot-long boats barely wider than their bodies. It is 4:10 PM. The race should've started by now.

The flag waves. The cox screams. The boats surge forward.

At least a thousand people are gathered around a massive screen in Furnivall Gardens—yelling, chanting, clapping—and watching the boats from an aerial view, I start to see what O'Connor might have meant earlier: how a boat full of men move as one machine, almost. As the boats pass us on the river, the crowd pushes towards the bank, goes wild, and the cheers for Cambridge mount as they pull ahead.

In 18 minutes and 58 seconds, it's over. Cambridge glides across the finish line. As soon as they do, Luke Juckett, an American on their crew, stands up and screams: "This. Is. Cambridge."

And it may be the greatest moment of his life.

We will all forget it. We'll forget about him, about how many boats ahead his team was, how hard he worked to get there, the hours spent training for this moment. This race has gone on for more than a century, and his name, like those of so many years past, will fade. We will forget him.

Anyway, I've been drinking.

There will always be another boat race, for more first-timers to watch. The chance encounters, the temporary leveling out of London's social stratum, and the easy excuse for all-day booze.

Follow Drew Schwartz on Twitter.

Follow Christopher Bethell on Twitter.



American Obsessions: How 'Sailor Moon' Fandom Became a Refuge for 90s Queer Kids

$
0
0

Japanese cartoon Sailor Moon not only brought anime to the American mainstream in the early 90s, but it also inspired a cult following amongst people who identified with and appreciated the cartoon's progressive portrayal of LGBT characters.

On this episode of American Obsessions, VICE dives into the inclusive world of Sailor Moon fandom. We meet up with a few die-hard Moonies at the Los Angeles Anime Expo and New York's International Sailor Moon Day celebration to find out how these animated characters helped to create a sense of community and shape queer identities.

An Ontario Priest May Have Gambled Away $500,000 in Refugee Donations

$
0
0


Father Amer Saka, pictured above, allegedly confessed to gambling away half a million dollars in donations. Photo via Facebook

A priest from London, Ontario is being investigated for allegedly gambling away $500,000 in donations for refugees.

Father Amer Saka, a former priest of St. Joseph's Chaldean Catholic Church, is allegedly under investigation by London police after he told his bishop he had spent half a million dollars in money meant for refugee families who were part of a private sponsorship program.

Reverend Emanuel Shaleta, who became head of Canada's Chaldean eparchy last year, told VICE that Saka confessed to him over a phone call in February that he no longer had the money. That call happened after a woman who was involved with the sponsorship program asked Shaleta about it. Confused, Shaleta pressed Saka and found out he had been secretly accepting funds for refugee families for approximately three years.

"He was supposed to let me know as a new bishop when they arrived in Canada."

Shaleta says he acted "immediately" after finding out, putting Saka on indefinite sabbatical and sending him for help at Southdown Institute––a non-profit centre in Toronto that deals with the rehabilitation of priests and church officials for issues ranging from mental health to addiction. As of now, Shaleta says Saka is at an undisclosed monastery and plans to return to Southdown at a later point.

Shaleta told VICE that despite Saka's admission, he's skeptical that the money was actually gambled and is holding his conclusion until the police finish their investigation.

The London Police Service told VICE that an investigation into the situation is ongoing and that no specifics of the case could be confirmed.

With files from Tamara Khandaker.

Follow Jake Kivanc on Twitter.

'Planet Coaster' Takes the Theme Park Game to Even Greater Heights

$
0
0

All screens from the alpha of 'Planet Coaster'

Frontier Developments have form when it comes to simulation games. The Cambridge-based company's got the Elite series to its name, for one, and then there's 2013's Zoo Tycoon reboot for Xbox consoles. But amongst the sci-fi epics and zoological escapades there's a host of pleasure-filled theme park "builder" affairs, ranging from casual-appeal titles to those demanding a lot more concentration and commitment to get the most out of.

2004's RollerCoaster Tycoon 3 invited the player to build and manage every little aspect of a theme park as major as they wanted it to be. It featured a variety of customers, called "peeps," from children to teenagers to their parents, whose needs constantly required monitoring, and parks—or areas of them—that could be themed. Want a park with a pre-historic vibe, or a sci-fi day out for the family, or even both at the same location? Not a problem. Tycoon 3 was followed by a pair of expansions, Wild! (safaris and zoos) and Soaked! (water parks and aquariums), and Frontier went on to produce further theme park titles: the strategy-based Thrillville, Coaster Crazy for iOS, and the futuristic Screamride.

In 2016, Frontier is releasing its most detailed theme park creation and management sim yet, Planet Coaster. The full game is expected toward the end of the year, but an alpha version featuring a small selection of the tools available in the finished product (but no actual coaster building) was made available on March 22. Just ahead of the alpha's launch, I spent an hour beside the game's lead artist John Laws, playing around with the endless possibilities available—building up and flattening terrain to create new areas for commercial use (and yes, obviously, I made some cock-and-balls shaped hills), setting up ground-level rides and connecting them to existing thoroughfares, building burger joints and shake shacks to fit a pirate theme, and shifting the day/night cycle to see my creation lit up like so many Christmas trees.

The user interface is, like most management sims, a little fiddly at first, with several layers of options in each category of assets. But give it ten minutes, and it feels as natural as swinging a Wii controller to strike a virtual tennis ball. And after my very enjoyable, eye-opening hands-on preview with Planet Coaster, a game that takes the Tycoon formula and spins it out into far greater scope, I spoke to Frontier's creative director Jonny Watts.

VICE: So I've been having a lot of fun here, just making my park, making sure that all of my little peeps are happy. Is that the real intent here—to have fun with the tools, create a monster park, and then share it with others online?
Jonny Watts: Well, you can play it that way. We are going to have a campaign mode, which will have some traditional bits that unlock, depending on what you complete—like, there will be sets of puzzles within certain scenarios. But that's just one facet of the game. If you can't have fun in a coaster game, we're missing something. So if you just want to play with unadulterated creativity and simply build the park of your dreams, as crazy as you want it, that's what we're working hard on achieving.

And in terms of the alpha, you're giving people some of the tools, but far from the full set. What do you hope to achieve from running the alpha, when it comes to feedback?
There are two threads to the alpha. One, I'm hoping to see some amazing castles and shops built out of all the modular scenery pieces, like fountains the size of the Leaning Tower of Pisa, just really crazy stuff. But I'm also hoping to get information on telemetry, about the flow, how hard is it to place assets, where are the little stumbling blocks. We're so close to the project, and we've played it for so long that we sort of skirt over some things that may not be quite correct. Also, the alpha is important for our usability testing: What can you learn in half an hour? From first impressions? This is a game with lots of longevity, so I want to know what our community is thinking about the controls a week into playing it, two weeks into it. That's when those things that may seem a little longwinded are actually fairly liberating, and give you a lot of control.

'Planet Coaster,' alpha launch livestream, showing off a lot more of the game's features (skip to two minutes in)

Frontier's got its history with theme park titles. But why come back to the genre now?
Yeah, we like to think we know a little about rollercoaster games. I started off on the expansion packs to RollerCoaster Tycoon 2, a 2D game, a beautiful game. I got totally wrapped up in it, I loved it, and I think that helped when it came to pitching Tycoon 3. We did that, and then Thrillville took things away from the super-simulation; Coaster Crazy was improving our coaster rendering technology. We even did Kinect: Disneyland Adventures, in which you couldn't build any coasters in it, but it was still about the fluid dynamics of how a crowd goes around. With each one of those games, we learned more and more, so when we had the chance to do Planet Coaster, with the revival of the simulation genre, we could really do things that are expanding upon all the different areas of this sort of game.

How do you feel about the word "simulation," when it comes to pitching a new game to the public? Perhaps it's just me, but something about the word implies "work," and that's no way to have fun.
I think "simulation" did turn people off, from about 2000 to 2015. I don't think there were that many proper simulation games, and games in general got more dumbed down. But now we've got Cities: Skylines and Prison Architect proving that there is a market for these games. There are people like me, we still exist! But there are also younger players now who want to stretch their creativity. So yes, there's absolutely a market for simulation games now. We are working really hard on the user interface to ensure that its "nested complexity" is as simple as possible—in other words, that it's really easy to put things down. And the park will function, and the guests will go here and there. But if you spend a little extra time on customizing your shop, putting up signs, making sure the theming's correct, and its positioning is ideal, you'll extract more money. So it's all about depth and longevity.

And making money.
Well, that is one of the aims in the game, and a lot of players are very into maximizing their profits. I think it was John (Laws), actually, who said about this that what you're doing is trying to build this marvelous, mechanical machine full of coasters and rides and scenery, to extract the maximum amount of money out of pockets. And that's true to the simulation pitch—the game is so deep that everything you build feeds into this economic simulation.

Article continues after the video below

Related: Watch VICE's film on Guatemala's drunken horse race

And there must also be the appeal of making things that you just couldn't in real life, practically. I mean, a fountain the size of the Leaning Tower... that's doable, sure, but its cost effectiveness must be questionable, for real.
It's a mixture of reality and fantasy, for sure—a lot of the terraforming options, for example, are things you really cannot do in real life. But when it comes to the coasters themselves, we're really trying to make them believable, so that you have that connection with them. If we made them too fantastical, when people were being catapulted from here to there, players wouldn't feel it was real. Rollercoasters can be scary things, in the real world—you go on some of the really good ones, and you're really thinking that you're not going to make it.

Hands up, I am a total coward with these things. Which is why I'm happy to ride the Planet Coaster attractions, from the first-person perspective, and do my extreme coasting that way.
Some people really love riding the coasters; others just want to build them. But I like that this is a game with many different facets that you can hook into.

And after the alpha, what's the timeline like for Planet Coaster?
There will be another alpha, which will be interesting. We want to use these alphas to help us make the game better. I make this statement, and it sounds obvious, but it's true: You don't start off with a finished game. We start off with a blank canvas. We think we know how to make coasters. We've done our time there, so that's not a risk. That's why those are coming later. Right now, we're aiming to get the user interface right, and test our rendering of thousands of people. Can they navigate around these paths? We're doing things that really haven't been done before, and that's why this game is going to be great. The crowd is so important—they have to physically get onto that ride, or buy that burger. And when you see that number saying there are 2,000 people in your park, there really are—this isn't a cod-simulation guesstimation. It's done from first principles. You have to entice your guests to go to these areas of your park. And we needed to test this, to get this right. We will have thousands of individual figures moving around in your park. So you'd best make sure there are enough bins, and toilets. That balance is going to be a challenge.

Find more information about Planet Coaster at the game's official website.

Follow Mike Diver on Twitter.

The VICE Guide to Right Now: Georgia's Governor Says He'll Veto the State's Horrible Anti-LGBT Bill

$
0
0

Photo via Flickr user Ted Eytan

Read: How to Make Life Better for LGBT People in 2016

Georgia Governor Nathan Deal announced Monday that he will veto Bill 757, a controversial piece of legislation that would allow faith-based businesses to deny services and jobs to gay, lesbian, or transgender people.

Since the bill passed Georgia's Republican-dominated legislature it has inspired a torrent of criticism, not just from liberals but from many major business players in the state—Disney vowed to stop filming in Georgia if the measure became law, tech giant Salesforce threatened to avoid doing business in the state, and the NFL announced that it might jeopardize Atlanta's chances of hosting the Super Bowl.

Deal, a Republican, said the veto was not a reaction to pressure from religious groups, but rather to uphold the "character of our state and character of our people." He added during his press conference Monday, "I do not think we have to discriminate against anyone to protect the faith-based community in Georgia, of which I and my family have been a part of for all of our lives."

The announcement comes the same day that the ACLU, the LGBT group Equality North Carolina, and two trans men and a lesbian jointly filed a lawsuit against North Carolina officials over a law forcing trans people to use the bathroom that corresponds with the gender listed on their birth certificates. That law has been criticized by Charlotte's mayor as "literally the most anti-LGBT legislation in the country," and the suit's goal is to get it declared unconstitutional.

The VICE Guide to the 2016 Election: Why Bernie Sanders Needs the FBI's Help to Beat Hillary

$
0
0

Too bad for Bernie that birds can't vote. AP Photo/Steve Dykes

Every reality show hits that late-season slump when it becomes obvious who the real contenders are. You shared a sweet moment with the bachelor when you were riding horses through that field, but ultimately you're not hometown-visit material. You're the teenage karaoke queen of Anytown, Texas, but that and your crowd-pleasing, self-bedazzled outfits aren't going to be enough for you to crack the top five on Idol. And so here we are in the 2016 election, with months to go before the conventions but with Donald Trump and Hillary Clinton looking like inevitabilities.

Yes, Bernie Sanders swept Hawaii, Alaska, and Washington in Saturday's primaries, proof again that he can inspire a lot of enthusiasm among Democratic voters, especially young ones. And he reassured a crowd in Madison, Wisconsin, that he can win both the nomination and the general election. But if he does, it's going to be a comeback that would be unprecedented in contemporary US presidential politics. Here's how that could happen:

The Democratic race is complicated by the existence of "superdelegates," or delegates who aren't bound to a candidate through a primary or caucus. These party loyalists and elected officials currently favor Clinton, but the Sanders campaign believes that if he wins a majority of pledge delegates it will demonstrate that he's a more viable candidate than Clinton, and also put pressure on the superdelegates not to overturn the wishes of the majority of Democratic voters. Putting aside superdelegates, Sanders would have to win nearly 60 percent of the delegates in the remaining states, including big victories in places like California and New Jersey, according to NPR.

That would entail a major shift in the campaign. So far, states with a lot of voters of color have gone for Clinton, Western states have backed Sanders, and some contested states (like Iowa, Massachusetts, and Missouri) have been virtually tied. It would mean that close races would have to turn into landslides for Sanders, and that the polls would have to be proved dramatically wrong.

In New York, those polls are currently heavily in Clinton's favor, and same goes for California and Pennsylvania: All states where Clinton has more than a nine-point lead now, and all states Sanders would have to win. Sanders fans might argue that these numbers don't factor in his recent victories, and that by chipping away and Clinton's aura of invincibility (or at least inevitability) he'll change the narrative and convince people to switch.

But there are no new arguments that Clinton supporters haven't heard before. The next "Hillary Is a Bad Person and Not Even a Feminist" op-ed will not result in an outbreak of Bern; if voters haven't turned on Clinton because of her Wall Street ties, her support for the disastrous Libya intervention, or her link to the now-unpopular "tough on crime" policies of the 90s, what is it going to take for people to turn on her? What new dirt could possibly be unearthed?

That's why Sanders's last, best hope is the FBI.

All of the above is out the window if the FBI indicts her for mishandling classified information stored in her infamous private email server. It's unlikely, but if Clinton or her closest aides were charged with crimes, her electability—her best argument—would suddenly be in doubt. Voters and superdelegates would be spooked; party officials would be looking around for an alternative to Clinton, and their only option would be Sanders. Ironically, those "damn emails" that Sanders once said Americans were tired of hearing about would be the very thing making him the favorite by default.

In this dreamworld we're erecting here, the general election is a relative cakewalk for Sanders, because the only major-party alternative for voters in November is Trump. The GOP would run ads calling Sanders a socialist, a communist, a traitor to America. Some shady PACs would release ads taking dog-whistle shots at him because he's Jewish. Trump would paint him as an out-of-touch activist who never created a job in his life. It would be an ugly, ugly race. Michael Bloomberg, the billionaire perpetually on the cusp of running as a third-party candidate, might change his mind and jump in in an attempt to save America from itself.

But Bloomberg would have no national constituency, and the early polls that predicted a Sanders-over-Trump victory would prove correct. Voters might not agree with Sanders on everything, but many would vote for him just because he's not Trump—they'd vote for a ham sandwich over Trump, or a collection of knives, or any random teenager skateboarding behind a 7-Eleven. A Sanders presidency would be a strange outcome given that he's been in the political wilderness basically his entire career, but it wouldn't be as dangerous as a Trump administration. That's how Sanders winds up being sworn in on January 20. That's how he forces the Democratic Party leftward, and how the country's history is inexorably altered.

That's the kind of vision Sanders volunteers may have in their heads as they work the phones, lick envelopes, and knock on doors. But they should remember that victory isn't the only way Sanders could change history. If the predictable comes to pass and Sanders winds up back in Vermont, it won't be on him to remake the Democratic Party in his image—it'll be up to his former campaign workers. In the morning after he concedes the race, they could give up on politics and conclude it's a rigged game. Or they could look at the effect he had on the race, realize there's a demand out there for genuine populist leftist candidates, and get out their calendars. If 2016 isn't the year of the revolution, there's always 2018, and 2020, and 2022...

The US Capitol Went on Lockdown After a Shooting Monday

$
0
0

On Monday afternoon, a man was shot at the visitor center of the US Capitol building in Washington, DC, prior to being arrested by police. Earlier reports suggested an officer was shot and injured, albeit not seriously, after a man brandished a gun in the building.

The incident came at a tense moment in national and international politics, with a heated US presidential campaign underway and Western Europe still reeling from last week's bombings in Brussels, which killed 35 people. It's not clear what motivated the gunman, but Capitol Police seemed to quickly get the situation in DC under control.

Adding to the confusion Monday, Capitol Police had previously scheduled a shooting drill for the same morning.

Why Toronto Police Go Easy on Cops Who Drive Drunk

$
0
0


Photo by Jake Kivanc

If the Toronto Police Service (TPS) continues its slow march toward doling out stiff punishments for officers who drive drunk, it will be partly because of Enis Egeli, a local constable who swerved all over the Gardiner Expressway while a television cameraman looked on.

It was around 4 AM on December 2, 2013 when a City cameraman spotted Egeli, off-duty and heading east, driving erratically. Egeli struck a curb and continued driving, according to legal records, "swerving from lane to lane," and eventually pulling over.

The cameraman passed Egeli's car, noting that the front tires were flat and the airbags had gone off. He alerted police and doubled back, but Egeli was gone when he returned. The cameraman eventually found Egeli parked on Spadina Avenue and recalled that the constable was speaking on the phone and seemed "tired or impaired."

Responding officers noted that Egeli smelled of alcohol, and breath samples taken at 6:11 AM and 6:45 AM showed readings of 133 and 122 mg/100mL of blood, respectively. In Ontario, 80 mg/100mL of blood constitutes drunk driving.

Egeli was found guilty of operating a motor vehicle while impaired by alcohol and operating a motor vehicle with a blood alcohol level above the legal limit.

Egeli pled guilty to discreditable conduct at a Toronto police disciplinary tribunal last month, providing an opportunity for the force to solidify a new standard of punishment for officers who drive drunk.

Police disciplinary hearings proceed like a trial before a judge. A cop's lawyer and a high-ranking officer typically act as defence and prosecution. Another high-ranking officer usually oversees the proceedings as a hearing officer and renders a decision and written explanation.

It's these disciplinary decisions that the TPS says shape the punishments that a hearing officer can dole out. And while there has been a trend toward stricter penalties for drunk driving, according to police spokesperson Meaghan Gray, the process "doesn't happen overnight."

A 20-day forfeiture of pay is a common punishment for an officer who drives drunk and the maximum allowable forfeiture under the Police Services Act, Gray said.

Punishments for officers who've driven drunk caught the attention of the Toronto Star, whose investigative reporters analyzed disciplinary decisions from GTA forces and the OPP, and concluded last year that "Toronto police have doled out the most lenient penalties to officers caught drinking and driving—an average of about 20 days docked pay."

A 2006 OPP disciplinary decision in the case of a sergeant who drove drunk made a similar observation, noting that the provincial police force punished "alcohol-related driving allegations with demotion" while the TPS opted for "penalties from six days off to twelve days off," the decision read.

But as the hearings office considers Egeli's punishment, it has the chance to set a tougher precedent.

At a hearing last month, service prosecutor Insp. Peter Callaghan argued that Egeli's rank should be reduced from first- to second-class constable for a year, a punishment that would entail about $9,500 less pay.

"We are at a crossroad," Callaghan said. "It is open to this tribunal to raise the penalties."

Callaghan said an average of five officers a year had appeared at the tribunal for impaired driving convictions in recent years, and that warnings from former Toronto police chief Bill Blair "seem to have fallen on deaf ears."

The hearing officer in Egeli's case is Supt. Debra Preston,who authored a 2014 decision that saw Sgt. John Sievers forfeit 20 days' pay after he drove drunk while off-duty in Nova Scotia. Sievers was "involved in a single motor vehicle accident," according to tribunal records and was driving his damaged car when an RCMP officer stopped him.

Preston warned officers in her decision that "The Service is at a cross roads for cases of Impaired Driving and/or Drive over 80 mgs."

"This must be a general deterrent to members in and of itself that given the right set of circumstances, gradation, demotion and/or dismissal are likely penalties," Preston wrote.

Preston's message was clear, said Callaghan, who noted that he had "problems"with the Star's articles, but underscored the inconsistency the reporters had highlighted.

"Our current penalty range no longer makes any sense," he said.

Preston could now follow through on her warning, a rare opportunity in a system that proceeds according to the limits of precedent.

Insp. Charles Young of the OPP's Professional Standards Bureau knows the limits well and said they prevent the force from simply firing officers.

"If the organization could, we would dismiss you if you did it the first time, but the jurisprudence will not support that," he said.

Defence counsel Gary Clewley said Callaghan made" an alarmingly almost-persuasive argument, "but countered that because Egeli's offences predated Preston's warning, he should be exempt from this "new regime."

Clewley argued for a 20-day forfeiture.

"He couldn't have known because the notice hadn't been sent out," Clewley said.

As for any officers found to have driven drunk since the Sievers decision was issued, Clewley said in an interview that a demotion is "inevitable."

"I'm not cheering it on. But I'm saying that the writing's on the wall," he said.

Follow Stephen Spencer Davis on Twitter.


I’m Not ‘Credible’ but It Doesn’t Mean I Wasn’t Raped

$
0
0


Protesters hold signs outside of the Toronto courthouse as they await a verdict in the Jian Ghomeshi sexual assault trial. THE CANADIAN PRESS/Chris Young

Much of Canada is still talking about a verdict last week in which a famous man was acquitted of four counts of sexual assault and one of choking to overcome resistance. More than the question of whether or not Ghomeshi committed the crimes, people are talking about what this decision says about the system at large and what, if anything, to do about the fact that survivors are the ones on trial.

If you are triggered by explicit discussions of rape, and if the word Ghomeshi wasn't enough to deter you from reading, I would gently suggest you consider stopping now. If you have a lot of questions about why survivors respond the way they do following a sexual assault and you'd like to hear from someone with that lived experience, then I invite you to keep reading.

In 2011, I was raped. I was raped by a man with whom I'd had great consensual sex many times, and we were still lovers at the time I was raped. I told him, this one time, that I didn't want sex: a rarity with me. He had sex with me anyway. I was bruised afterwards. I didn't want the bruises there. In short, none of what happened was consensual.

Here's what I remember.

After he raped me, I yelled, "You just raped me!" I got up, grabbed all of his clothes and laptop bag off the floor and threw them out my front door. I pushed him out after them.

The laptop bag was blue.

The laptop bag was purple.

The laptop bag was black.

He wore jeans.

He wore khakis.

After he raped me, I stammered, "You just raped me." He looked horrified, and we had a long discussion about it.

After he raped me, I yelled, "You just raped me!" He said no he didn't, and we had a raging fight about it. He left and we didn't have sex again after that.

After he raped me, I yelled, "You just raped me!" He said no he didn't, and we had a raging fight about it. He left, and we didn't speak for three days. Then we talked about it and started having regular sex again a few days later.

After he raped me, I said nothing. We ate pizza in bed and watched Netflix.

After he raped me, I said nothing. We ate pizza in bed and streamed a show. From which site? I can't remember.

After he raped me, I said nothing. Later, we had sex.

After he raped me, I was bleeding.

After he raped me, I was not bleeding.

This is gruelling to read, I know. But I can't apologize or be any less blunt, because this is reality.

Any one of these things may have happened after I was raped. Or maybe none of them happened. I cannot remember, and I've never been able to remember. All I remember is the specific kind of pain I was in after, and the thoughts that went through my head during. That experience of incomplete memory is very common amongst survivors. As Dr. James Hopper and Dr. David Lisak wrote in Time after the infamous Rolling Stone rape story:

"Inevitably, at some point during a traumatic experience, fear kicks in. When it does, it is no longer the prefrontal cortex running the show, but the brain's fear circuitry—especially the amygdala. Once the fear circuitry takes over, it—not the prefrontal cortex—controls where attention goes."

Trauma affects memory. While I cannot remember what happened directly following this experience, I do remember why it never crossed my mind to report it to police. I had feelings for the man who raped me. I don't think he knew that what he did was rape. He didn't have the literacy to understand consent. And I was sure police wouldn't have done anything about it anyway, especially based on just how severely "uncredible" my claims would have seemed in court.

I chose to tell this story rather than write about Ghomeshi or the specifics of this case because, to me, this verdict is not about Ghomeshi or the specifics of this case. It is about the fact that survivors don't have a chance in hell of being believed by the so-called justice system. Within this system, men can do what they want to women and other survivors and expect to meet nothing in the way of consequences. Knowing what I know, I would never suggest that a person report their sexual assault to police. As Toronto's Jane Doe, who is covering the case for NOW magazine and who once sued police for negligence after catching her own serial rapist, said to me on the phone a few days before the verdict was announced: "Each time we support this system, we drive another nail through another woman's body."

What she means is we can encourage survivors to report to police, but what's likely to happen is they will be dragged through the system and humiliated, only to watch their abusers be let off because they are not "credible" or there's not enough evidence. The system isn't set up to recognize the reality of sex crimes.

I am the worst possible victim: I'm not quiet and I'm not ashamed and I'm an overtly sexual person and I have a horrible memory and I'm still friends with my rapist. I did not go to police. I did not go to police right away. I don't want him to be in jail. I don't cry about this incident all the time, and it didn't ruin my life. I am the worst possible victim.

But it doesn't mean I wasn't raped. I was raped in 2011.

Please believe me.

Follow Sarah Ratchford on Twitter.

VICE Shorts: This Guy Says He Can Make Anyone a Reality TV Star

$
0
0


Screenshot via Vimeo

The New York Reality TV School is a series of classes taught by Robert Galinsky out of an unassuming storefront in Manhattan. Galinsky, the "executive facilitator," has no experience in acting or reality television. He decided to start the school after a dog groomer asked him for advice on becoming a reality TV star. Fueled by ego and unbridled confidence, Galinsky opened the small space on Avenue C in 2008 and today shares what little, occasionally detrimental, knowledge he has with the city's aspiring reality TV personalities.

Filmmaker John Wilson took it upon himself to document Galinsky's school, approach, and students in his short film How to Act on Reality TV. Over the course of a one-day workshop, we are introduced to a new group of students including a legally blind singer, a male-revue dancer, and "a homeless guy who sleeps by the Bronx Zoo."

Wilson creates a bizarre cocktail of awkwardness, discomfort, and vulnerability in what quickly becomes a meta movie about truth and identity. He deftly captures those elusive moments that make reality TV great: ludicrous statements, stranger-than-fiction situations, and mind-melting reactions.

Part Nathan for You, part Waiting for Guffman, part informal PUA conference, How to Act on Reality TV is an uncomfortable, hilarious look at real people doing real things that you really can't believe are real—on camera.

Check out my interview with filmmaker John Wilson below to see his thoughts on Reality TV, the hidden truths behind the film, and other fun stuff.

VICE: How did you first meet Robert Galinksy?
John Wilson: I initially found Galinksy when I was surfing the web and stumbled across his website for the reality-TV school. I was fascinated by the entire concept and gave him a call to talk about making a show based on the program. After that we met up a few times and within a couple of months we shot a pilot episode.

The fact that Galinksy started a reality-TV acting school while having basically no industry connections or experience makes him, to me, authentically oblivious or accidentally gangster. What exactly is your take on his take on what he does?
I think Galinksy is an incredibly savvy guy and wants to live within the world of reality TV in one way or another. I genuinely feel that he has their best interests in mind, but unfortunately has to do a lot of role-playing in the program to prepare them for crass producers. There is a lot of weird profiling that happens in the casting process of any big production, and I don't think there's enough conversation surrounding that. I also feel that reality TV has a way of simultaneously insulting the intelligence of both the subjects and their audience, so if someone is really determined to enter that world, a program like this can educate them on how unnatural and manipulative reality-TV production can be.

The group of prospective reality stars are as diverse as they are wonderful. Which ones do you think have the most breakout potential and why?
They are all really interesting in different ways. I really like how talkative and unfiltered Shannon has this wild energy that's hard to predict. I actually had to hire half of them from Craigslist the day before we shot because turnout was going to be low that particular afternoon. Headlee, Ulachi, and Shannon were the first people to reply and they all showed up the next morning.

So how "real" is what we're seeing on screen? The people seem so genuine and earnest that it screams stranger than fiction, but some of the situations they find themselves in are beyond odd.
I basically told Galinksy that I was going to show up with my crew and shoot his introductory class from beginning to end. I knew he wanted to do some exterior field tests, but I mostly followed his lead as he improvised challenges based on the student's strengths/weaknesses. The only time we really intervened was when the pizza came for lunch.

Do you consider yourself a documentary filmmaker, and if so, what is your definition of "truth"?
I guess so. I like the term "nonfiction film" a bit better, but it doesn't really matter. It just bums me out when some people hear "documentary" and they think Blackfish. I showed this movie to a group of people I had no connection with and they all thought it was scripted. I guess the truth is always revealed somehow by your subject, whether it's staged or observed.

One of the nine commandments is to "groom hairy PITTS (Personal Issues to Tease)." Do you have any PITTS that would make you a great reality TV star?
I'm not sure. I usually display all of my personal issues in little memoir films.

Have you ever or would you consider being on reality TV yourself?
I thought it would be really funny to find my way onto The Bachelorette somehow and be the guy that is only there to make friends.

Watching this, I can't believe it's over. Have any of them made it? Is this ever going to be a real TV series? Is that something you're trying to do?
I'm not really sure where they are now. A handful of them actually left in the middle of our shoot to audition for the next season of The Real World. I'd really love to turn this into a TV series if we can find the right company. The bulk of programming for a lot of major networks is already reality TV, and a show like this may be pulling the curtain back a bit too far. I think it has enormous potential, but I also kind of like it as a self-contained piece.

What are you working on now?
I just finished a film about a recent court-TV appearance I had, but I'll never be able to put it online because CBS could sue me for a tremendous amount of money.

Jeffrey Bowers is a tall mustached guy from Ohio who's seen too many weird movies. He currently lives in Brooklyn, working as a film curator. He's the senior curator for Vimeo's On Demand platform. He has also programmed at Tribeca Film Festival, Rooftop Films, and the Hamptons International Film Festival.

The VICE Guide to Right Now: Being Lazy at Work Is Actually Good, Says Study

$
0
0

Flickr photo via Flickr user Laurence Simon

Read: The Future of Work Is Free Snacks, No Benefits, and Looking for Jobs from Your Bed

While employers might try to avoid hiring from the influx of "lazy" snapchatting millennials flooding the job market, a new study suggests lazy workers might not be entirely worthless.

That study comes via an NPR piece about the phenomenon of people who "don't seem to do much work at work"—the folks who browse Facebook, take multiple long bathroom breaks, or simply stare off into space rather than whatever task is providing them with their hourly wage. Some people interviewed by NPR talked about how it was important to think things through sometimes rather than merely blaze through assignments; others looked back on when they learned lessons by watching slow workers, but the truly interesting fact is that laziness isn't unique to humans.

In a new study published in February's issue of Nature, agriculture professor Eisuke Hasegawa found that widespread laziness in ant colonies can actually make the group stronger—the lazy ants act as reinforcements when the hard-working ants get burnt out.

The study found that 20 to 30 percent of ants in a colony spend their time grooming or just lying around, but under pressure they get shit done—a phenomenon mirrored by workplace procrastinators. So go ahead, take a longer lunch, go down a Reddit rabbit hole, or check up on your Tinder profile—it might just be the cure to your already boring job or essential to office camaraderie.

What Canadians’ Race-Specific Porn Searches Say About Us

$
0
0


Maps via Pornhub

Among the "creampies," "smoking," and "facesitting" featured in Pornhub's insights into Canadian search habits released earlier this month, a few of the results stuck out. When it came to most searched relative terms amongst Canadian provinces—meaning searches more popular in a single province compared to others—race-related words were rampant, including: "Asian" in BC, "Eskimo" in Nunavut, "Indian" in Ontario, and "Native" in Manitoba.

Is this just multicultural Canada looking for porn featuring performers who look like themselves? Pornhub's own release suggested race-specific searches comparatively came up most in provinces with significant non-white populations. In Manitoba, for example, First Nations people make up over 15 percent of the population.

But sexuality experts VICE spoke to say that the results are more complicated, and could actually show how common sexually fetishizing race may be in Canada.

"It wouldn't be surprising if the searches were coming from people outside the racial group in question," said Patricia Marino, a philosophy professor at University of Waterloo who has studied sexual ethics. "Racial categories reflect the influence of colonialism and imperialism, in which white Europeans created racial categories to justify their mistreatment of others."

In North American society, where most people still identify as white, Marino said, some people might see other races being portrayed in porn as "exciting are encountering more Asian-identified people than in other provinces," Callander said. "That then filters into their sexual fantasies, their experiences with other people in the sexual and dating world, and so then that becomes a part of their fantasy porn life as well."

However complex our sexual desires can be, and for that matter, how heated we can get when someone tries to critique them, it's undeniable that race is a bit more of a complex preference than eye or hair colour, height, or body type given the historical context of discrimination and wrongdoing against racialized peoples. Pornography is one place in our society where our preferences—potentially including how some of us feel about race—are magnified. In the porn industry, race is considered such a defining factor that a white female performer can get paid more simply to have sex with a black man.

Sexual inclinations may develop without significant conscious thought or consideration for some, but fetishes surrounding race could be more nuanced. When it comes to something as seemingly innocuous as what kind of porn we seek out, this could indicate how our country's colonial tendencies can bleed into so many parts of our society—even our personal sexual preferences.

Follow Allison Elkin on Twitter.

My Time with the Bangladeshi Bloggers Facing Terror and Machete Attacks

$
0
0

The killers walked along Shahbag Road, a wide, chaotic avenue in Dhaka, Bangladesh, bisected by a concrete divider, and entered Aziz Super Market, an indoor mall situated between the gaudy storefronts of Muslim Sweets and Juicy Fast Foods. The building's interior, three floors of ugly 70s concrete chic embittered by age, was little more than a series of poorly lit and dingy tunnels lined mostly with jeans and T-shirt shops.

It was around five in the afternoon, on October 31, 2015, when several men appeared. They ascended the staircase to the third floor, passing a row of brightly lit clothing stores with mannequins standing outside. At the far end of a secluded hallway, they reached the cramped office of Faisal Arefin Deepan's publishing house. Deepan was a handsome man with a boyish face, always well-dressed. At 43, he had made a name for himself by publishing both secular and religious works, including the works of Ajivit Roy, a prominent secular blogger who had been murdered earlier that year.

"The medical examiner's report said that he was 'murdered with the least possible pain,'" Deepan's father said. 'Those are the exact words: 'Murdered with the least possible pain.'"

That day, three men stood lookout in the hallways, while the other three entered the office, closing the door behind them. Once inside, they hacked Deepan to death with machetes. They focused on his face and neck, and left him in a pool of blood. Then they fled, padlocking the door behind them, apparently unnoticed by the other traders.

Deepan's father, Abul Kashem Fazlul Haq, an intellectual in his own right and professor of Bengali at the prestigious Dhaka University, found his body early that evening. He had rushed over when he heard of an attack that same day on another publisher with offices nearby and was unable to reach his son by phone. That publisher, Ahmedur Rashid Tutul, along with two writers who were also attacked that night, survived, though Tutul lost his hands.

"A few years ago, this couldn't have happened," Faruk Wasif, a local poet in his 30s, told me. We had met at the Dhaka Lit Fest, where I was an invited author, and he offered to take me personally to the market. Less than a month had passed since the killing, and he warned me it was unsafe for a foreigner to go alone. The building had once been a center for culture, filled with bookshops and publishers' offices, but in recent years, those businesses had shuttered. "Deepan's office would have been surrounded by students, by intellectuals, by people talking and discussing. Everyone knew one another then; there was a community here. That's all gone. Now no one knows anyone, and they all pretend they saw nothing."

"He died quickly," Deepan's father would tell me later as we sat together in an office at Dhaka University. "In less than five minutes." He wiped away a tear and continued. "The medical examiner's report said that he was 'murdered with the least possible pain.' Those are the exact words." He repeated it softly, " Murdered with the least possible pain."

It was November 2015, and I had been invited to Bangladesh to participate in Dhaka Lit Fest, a prominent international literary festival that had been, in one form or another, in existence since 2011. First impressions weren't promising. The road from the airport was a congested mess of stationary vehicles that, every ten or so minutes, would clear up, allowing cars to creep another hundred meters before clogging again amid a constant barrage of honking. The driver told me that this was normal. The scene looked like a post-apocalyptic New Delhi. Extreme privilege rubbed shoulders with extreme want more violently than anywhere I'd ever been. Half the vehicles, battered to the edge of extinction, could be pulled straight off these streets and used unaltered in the next Mad Max movie, while many of the others, polished to a high sheen by diligent servants, would fit in on a boulevard in Malibu.

In previous years, the event had been called the Hay Festival Dhaka, after the storied Hay Festival of Literature and Arts, set annually in the bucolic greenery of Hay-on-Wye in Wales. The Hay had become a franchise, with obscure cities around the world ponying up for a Hay festival to attract tourists and boost the local cultural life. Changing the name to Dhaka Lit Fest, and throwing off the shackles of a connection to the old colonizer, symbolized a kind of coming-out party for the city. But recent events had cast a pall over the gathering.

In 2015, four blogger/writers had been brutally murdered in Bangladesh, and less than three weeks before the festival was set to begin, the publisher Deepan was killed in his office. In response, a week before the festival, the US State Department issued a travel advisory for Bangladesh, warning foreigners to stay away from large gatherings and international hotels—exactly where attendees would be during their stay. The morning before opening day, the Supreme Court of Bangladesh upheld the death penalties for two opposition party leaders, Ali Ahsan Mohammad Mujahid and Salahuddin Quader Chowdhury, for their roles in organizing mass slaughter and rape during the 1971 War of Independence, when Bangladesh was formed out of what had previously been East Pakistan. The men were given 24 hours to publicly admit to the crimes they were convicted of and lodge an appeal, but failing that, they would be hanged almost immediately.

Within hours of the ruling, an Italian priest and aid worker, Piero Parolari, who had lived in the country for 35 years, was shot in the head while cycling just north of the capital city. That same afternoon, Jamaat-e-Islami, an Islamic fundamentalist organization aligned with the political opposition, called a hartal, a national strike, during which no cars would be allowed on the streets. This ban would coincide with the first day of the festival. Anyone found outside, especially foreigners I was warned, was subject to random attack.

All illustrations by Deshi Deng

As if to add insult to injury, the government shut down social media sites and messaging apps to discourage people from spreading rumors or organizing protests. "We've built our whole marketing plan around getting the word out through Facebook," festival co-director Sadaf Saaz Siddiqi said, "and now it gets shut down." A perfect storm had gathered, and it was quickly gaining enough force to sink the festival before it even began.

Many writers had already canceled, including the festival's headliners, Nobel Prize–winning Trinidadian-British writer V. S. Naipaul and American writer (and Naipaul biographer) Paul Theroux. The latter's son, Marcel Theroux, also a novelist, did arrive. He told me his father had spent his life traveling in many dangerous places, but at 74, and after reading the stream of alarming travel advisories, decided that it wasn't worth the chance. Even some local Bangladeshi writers, who lived in the city, chose to stay away. Anything might happen, a bomb or machete could be smuggled in, or the large contingent of police protecting the site might be overpowered by a mob. The series of coordinated terror attacks in Paris a week earlier only heightened the fear. In a country where free speech was being actively targeted by a minority of violent fundamentalists, the Dhaka Lit Fest was gleefully wearing a bull's-eye on its back.

Among those who accepted the invitation despite the climate was Dr. Harold Varmus, a Nobel laureate in medicine, who said the US State Department had pleaded with him not to go out of fear for his life. "I was already in New Delhi when I got the message," the 76-year-old scientist told me. "It seemed silly to turn back then." But the night before the festival opened, huddled in the armed camp that had become of the Pan Pacific Sonargaon, the luxurious five-star hotel where attendees were housed, none of us knew for sure whether the festival would even open the following morning.

Almost immediately after attacks on Faisal Deepan and Ahmedur Tutul in October, al Qaeda in the Indian subcontinent claimed responsibility "as vengeance for the honour of the messenger of Allah and the religion of Islam. These two publishers were worse than the writers of such books, as they helped to propagate those books and paid the blasphemers handsome amount of money for writing them."

The books they referred to were by Avijit Roy, the blogger who had been brutally murdered in February, one of the few attacks that was witnessed. An outspoken atheist and humanist, he wrote books with titles such as The Virus of Faith and The Philosophy of Disbelief , certain to enrage a dimwitted but violent segment among Bangladesh's ultra-religious.

Roy's name had originally appeared on a hit list of 84 so-called atheist bloggers that started circulating in 2013. It was the first of many such lists, and Faisal Deepan's name would appear on one later, but its exact origins remain murky. While almost certainly drawn up by fundamentalist Islamic organizations, it was originally handed to the pro-secular government as a list of names to investigate and arrest, and preferably hang, for what the compilers called "the crime of atheism." He was killed outside the grounds of the Bangla Academy, where the festival was also being held. In photographs from that night, his wife stands over his body, covered head to foot in blood. She pleads for help while onlookers, including police officers, surround her, watching impassively.

Who could possibly want to murder C? He wasn't a blogger, writer, or activist; rather, he lived a regular life in a provincial city where he was a professor in a highly uncontroversial subject, which under normal circumstances would never raise anyone's hackles. But these were hardly normal circumstances.

"For years, Islamists have been increasing their presence in the country," 45-year old K. Anis Ahmed, a prominent publisher and novelist and one of the co-directors of the festival, told me. "But you also have to remember that about forty percent of the country never wanted independence. That number hasn't changed much, and that's the reason the BNP continues to have the support it does." He was referring to the Bangladesh Nationalist Party, founded in 1978 by Ziaur Rahman, who reintroduced multi-party politics to the country after a 1975 military coup.

Since the nation's founding in 1971, Bangladeshi politics has been dominated by a tenuous compromise between a secular Bengali worldview, one shared by a majority of Bangladeshis, and the reactionary forces who opposed independence from Pakistan, favoring instead the creation of a fundamentalist Islamist state. To this day, those forces remain committed to some form of "Talibanizing" Bangladesh.

When Sheikh Mujibur Rahman, leader of the secular Awami League and the country's first prime minister, was assassinated in the 1975 coup, the new military regime amended the previously secular constitution to make Islam the state religion. In the years since, increasingly large amounts of foreign money have been funneled into the country. The money has come from wealthy and conservative Bangladeshis abroad and hardliners in Saudi Arabia, and has been used to fund extremist organizations like Ansarullah Bangla Team (ABT), a group that would claim responsibility for killing the blogger Avijit Roy.

Ever since parliamentary democracy was again re-established in 1991, the country has been led by two leaders: Khaleda Zia, the first woman president in the country's history, and Sheikh Hasina, the daughter of Sheikh Mujibur Rahman, the founding father and first president of Bangladesh. The two women have leapfrogged each other as prime minister twice each, with Hasina currently holding the top job and Zia leading the opposition.

Under the moderate Hasina, the country has maintained some of its secular roots, while Zia's tenures have been characterized by a mercenary alliance with Jamaat-e-Islami, South Asia's oldest and purest radical Islamist party with ties to extremist groups like ABT. As Bangladesh's desperately poor population continues to skyrocket, this battle for the country's soul continues to edge the country away from its heady, idealistic roots and into the arms of the ultra-conservative mullahs.

On the first morning of the festival, opening ceremonies were delayed an hour and several of the day's events canceled or rescheduled because of the hartal. I entered by walking through a phalanx of officers wielding 7.62mm SKS rifles. Once inside the heavily secured gates, someone tapped me on the shoulder. I turned and standing there was a friend of almost 20 years, and someone I hadn't seen in over a decade, not since he had returned to his native Bangladesh from the US. I'll call him C, as he asked that his name not be published. Three days before he had received a frightening phone call from a friend.

"He told me my name's just appeared on a death list," C, who was in his early 50s, said. "He recognized three names. My name, his name, and one other mutual friend." The friend refused to say how he found out or where he saw the list, at least not over the phone. "He told me to keep my head down and watch everywhere. I haven't been able to talk to him in person, so I don't know what's going on. He's connected to the security services, so if anyone would know our names are on a hit list, he would." We sat down in an outdoor lounge, sponsored by a major credit-card company, and were offered tea by jacketed waiters who afterward stood soundlessly by. "I'm fucking terrified," C turned to me and said when the waiters were out of earshot. "I don't know what to fucking do."

Suddenly, what had seemed an academic exercise in trying to understand what was happening to writers in Bangladesh had become very personal. C kept looking over his shoulder the whole way there, he said, and didn't know how he was going to get back home. It was hard to comprehend. Who could possibly want to murder C? He wasn't a blogger, writer, or activist; rather, he lived a regular life in a provincial city where he was a professor in what I can only describe as a highly uncontroversial subject, and which under normal circumstances would never raise anyone's hackles. But these were hardly normal circumstances. Even a Facebook post could get your name on a death list, as the New York Times recently reported, when Bangladeshi friends of the journalist Salil Tripathi asked him not to even tag them on posts mentioning the killings.

That was likely how C became targeted, though he couldn't be sure, and it brought home how effective the death lists had been in silencing a whole country. Few people in Bangladesh were writing about the killings anymore. And those so-called atheist bloggers who still championed their rights in what they hoped was still a secular democracy had gone into deep hiding, staying in their homes, not going to their jobs, and keeping as low a profile as they could. Many had fled the country, and many others were making plans to do the same.

The previous afternoon, I'd had an appointment to meet Mostafa Ahmed Kamal, a distinguished writer and professor who was on the original hit list of 84 names. When I asked Kamal what it felt like to have been singled out on a death list, he laughed. "There are so many lists now," he said, "at least ten by my count." He was a middle-aged man with gentle eyes and a soft mouth, and his response to being targeted was a mix of incredulity and amusement. He couldn't imagine why anyone would want to kill him. He wrote stories, had briefly authored a blog in which he (at most) championed free speech and a scientific outlook, and spent his days teaching physics at the Independent University, which was where I met him in his sparsely furnished office.

"But that first list, you have to understand," he told me, "was made by fundamentalists and handed to the government, and the government itself then made a second list—and this is important—because on that second list, which only included twenty-seven names, they researched everything about the writers. Where they lived, where they worked, who their friends were, where they spent their evenings. It was supposed to be secret, but someone leaked it, and it was this list that got into the hands of the killers. It's a how-to guide to finding someone if you want to kill him or her. My name is on both."

One of the organizations widely believed to have created that first list was Ansarullah Bangla Team. Founded in 2007 and originally called Jama'atul Muslemin, ABT was inspired by al Qaeda with the goal of founding an Islamic state in Bangladesh built around a narrow vision of Sharia law. In 2013, the organization set out on a campaign to attack and kill secular bloggers, a fact it announced on its website as well as its Facebook page, where it listed potential targets. Other than Avijit Roy, it claimed responsibility for the deaths of bloggers Oyasiqur Rahman Babun and Ananta Bijoy Das, the murder of Rajshahi University professor Dr. A. K. M. Shafiul Islam, as well as attacks on several other prominent secular figures.

"If I want to go anywhere else, I have to call the police a day before, and they send six officers to accompany me," Kamal said. "But if you're a young writer and you find yourself on one of those lists, they won't do anything for you."

It was the second list, the one drawn up by the government, that interested Kamal most, and indeed, four bloggers on this list had been arrested by Sheikh Hasina's government in April 2013 on the charge of defaming Islam. It was hardly the move of a fiercely secular administration.

The brand of Islam practiced in Bangladesh, Kamal told me, has never been the prohibitive and austere style that's trumpeted by oil-rich Saudi sheikhs. It was a different religion, having emerged out of the religious and intellectual tumult that characterized medieval India, and heavily influenced by mystical strands of Sufism and its long history living alongside Hinduism and indigenous Bengal religions. "We're a soft people," he said. "A musical people, a mystical people. Our religion is not the religion they practice in the Middle East. We're not extremists, and we never have been."

I walked him to his car, which was kept securely off the street. "I used to go out all the time, to cafes, sometimes to talk all night, to travel," he said. "That's all gone. I move from here to home and back again, and I never stop on the way. If I want to go anywhere else, I have to call the police a day before, and they send six officers to accompany me. They do this because I've got a name, and it'll be an embarrassment if I'm killed. But if you're a young writer and you find yourself on one of those lists, they won't do anything for you. All they tell you is leave the country and don't look back."

As the festival continued, I was surprised to hear little talk of the killings. Rather, the city's turbulence seemed to melt away as we passed through layers of security and walked along winding lanes that passed the quaint, neo-Victorian buildings of the Bangla Academy. It was a relief to listen, instead, to excited chatter over newly published books and the rising place of Bengali in world literature. Yoss, a Cuban rocker and sci-fi novelist who dressed every inch the part, caused a minor stir wherever he walked, along with a flurry of requests for selfies with him. We sat on a panel together discussing the state of contemporary sci-fi writing where I admitted to being a huge Doctor Who fan in my youth. Leaving the auditorium, whole classes of local schoolgirls in their pristine uniforms mobbed me, wanting to know who my favorite doctor was and pose with me for one group selfie after another. The prevailing atmosphere wasn't one of danger but of possibility. The air felt charged with an electric optimism, and no topic was off-limits, from atheism to the erotic. Bangladesh, not only as a literary force but as a nation, people kept telling me, was ready to take its place on the world stage.

I had little time to enjoy the festival, though. Usually within minutes of sitting down at a poetry reading or the launch of a novel, someone would come up to me and whisper that another of the bloggers from the list had agreed to meet and talk, but that we had to leave immediately. Soon I'd be in the other Dhaka again, the city under threat, in a car edging nervously through traffic on the way to meet another man who'd been handed a death sentence for writing that was far less damning than what was being openly discussed at the lit fest.

The contrast couldn't have been more dramatic. While ensconced on the grounds of the festival, I found it hard not to share the abiding optimism of attendees. Once outside again, however, I felt the chill of a nation unable, or unwilling, to come to terms with the demons of its own internal contradictions and strife. A few local writers asked me for my predictions for Bangladesh's future. I couldn't clearly answer because I was continually confronted with two very different countries: the hopeful, forward-looking nation represented at the festival, and the other, where writers like Avijit Roy were hacked to death right outside the very grounds I was sitting in as the investigation seemed to go nowhere. I doubted either vision for Bangladesh would triumph, and the nation's future would be characterized by an ongoing and messy compromise.

In the days after Faisal Deepan's murder, Avijit Roy's widow, Rafida Bonya, penned an open letter attacking the ruling Awami League and the country's leader, Sheikh Hasina, blasting their continued inaction and what she called their outright pandering for Islamist votes:

Our only request to them is please stop wasting your energy by constantly shouting 'We are the secular party.' ... Stay silent and go on oiling the fundamentalist cleavers, otherwise you might lose a few votes. You know very well that it is your silence that is allowing them to hone their weapons.

K. Anis Ahmed told me that I shouldn't necessarily judge Hasina's inaction as a retreat from the ideals of a secular Bangladesh. "These killings have been going on for years," Ahmed explained. "They've been part of the ugly background noise of building the nation. In 1971, during the war, Jamaat-e-Islami not only massacred ordinary people, they also singled out writers and artists and professors to kill. Yet it was only recently that the government decided to bring these killers to justice. Part of the compromise of modern Bangladesh has been living with the fact that much of its leadership, at least during certain regimes, not only did not want the nation created, but that they actively organized the rape or slaughter of hundreds of thousands of its citizens. These new killings, ever since 2013, are a direct response to the government's determination to prosecute these war criminals."

2013 was a watershed year in the recent history of Bangladesh. So many of the tensions that had been simmering under the surface since its founding erupted. And it all happened a block from Faisal Deepan's office. On February 5, 2013, Abdul Quader Molla, a leading member of the Islamist party Jamaat-e-Islami, was convicted of crimes against humanity related to the 1971 massacres and sentenced to life in prison, a sentence that many in the country found too lenient. Massive protests erupted demanding the death penalty for all war criminals and the banning of Jamaat. They were called the Shahbag protests because they were centered on that park-filled neighborhood in central Dhaka. Counter-protests, organized by Jamaat, soon rocked the city, but the government quickly acceded, in part, to the demands of the Shahbag protestors and instated the death penalty for war criminals along with a sharply truncated appeals process. Conviction and execution would be separated by only a few months. Molla was finally hanged on December 12, 2013, an act which Jamaat dismissed as a "political killing" and vowed revenge for "every drop" of Molla's blood.

The sudden rise in the killing of bloggers since 2013 can be directly linked to the demands of Shahbag protestors, Ahmed told me. Many of the people being tried for war crimes are leaders in Jamaat, and with Jamaat crippled, the Bangladesh Nationalist Party is also crippled.

"It's why they've been keen to seize any opportunity to paint the Awami League as anti-Islamic," he told me, "and they've done a good job painting bloggers as atheists or apostates. It's the problem Prime Minister Hasina faces. Any expression of support for free speech, especially that of bloggers, would be twisted into support for atheists or apostates. And this is still a ninety percent Muslim country. If she comes out strongly for the bloggers, she'll lose her electoral base, and if she does that, BNP and Jamaat will push Bangladesh back into the arms of the hardline Islamists."

When I met Faisal Deepan's father, Abul Haq, at Dhaka University, he greeted me with a disarming smile and led me into sitting room attached to the offices of the Bangla Language Department, where he has taught for years. The room overlooked a grassy quad, where in 1952 students gathered to protest the imposition of Urdu over Bengali and other regional languages in what was then still East Pakistan. The Language Movement that was born here would lead to the schisms that gave birth to Bangladesh, and, according to the Awami League argument, these were the same forces that ultimately propelled Deepan's assailants.

However, Haq disagreed. "They didn't kill my son, not anyone from Bangladesh," he said. Instead, he suspected the Islamic State (ISIS), or the Taliban. "But the government doesn't want to admit this. Then the US will want to send forces here," he smiled ruefully. He was adamant that his son never shared Avijit Roy's beliefs, and he seemed at times angry that after Roy's murder, his son had not more forcefully distanced himself from the outspoken atheist. "Deepan committed a mistake when he published these books. If he had gone on TV, if he had made a statement, that he was against these books, that he repudiated them and would never publish them again, then maybe he would be alive."

I took his criticism of Roy as part of a father's grieving process, and changed the subject to the Shahbag protests, which happened outside Deepan's office. "Yes, he was there," he said. "He wasn't an organizer, but he attended the meetings and protests. He believed in the cause." All the killed writers had either openly supported and helped organize the protests, or attended them, and it struck me that Deepan's death could have easily have been due to his own beliefs as to those of the people he published.

"It's about economic power, here in Bangladesh," Ahasan insisted. "It's about getting it. It's about keeping it. They didn't die for their ideas; they died so someone else could get rich!"

When I left, it was early afternoon and a soft golden light filtered through the bedraggled halls of Dhaka University. On a wall, a handwritten poster for a student group meeting discussing the murders proclaimed, "We Must Not Die Before We Are Killed."

That outside forces are increasingly involved in the unrest in Bangladesh, according to many people I spoke to in Dhaka, is an argument the US government has been putting forward, calling them "violent extremists"—which these days, and in the context of Bangladesh, they would tell me is diplo-speak for ISIS. But the term could equally refer to disaffected Islamists inside the country, perhaps without any specific political affiliation.

Two months after Roy's murder, al Qaeda in the Indian Subcontinent (AQIS) joined the party and claimed responsibility, as it later would for Deepan's murder. The killings of two foreigners in late September and early October were claimed by ISIS, and that same week, three men were arrested for putting up ISIS recruitment posters reading, "The call of the Middle East." After the attack on the Italian priest on the day before the Dhaka Lit Fest, ISIS published an article in its mouthpiece outlet Dabiq titled "The Revival of Jihad in Bengal," in which it condemned Jamaat-e-Islami as insufficiently Islamic along with other indigenous Islamist organizations and called for their followers to join ISIS in its pure war, which it planned to spread from Bangladesh to India.

Sheikh Hasina's government continues to scoff at such reports. "I can say surely," she claimed in early October when she invited a group of journalists to her home, "that ISIS or any such type of organization or their activities have not sprouted in Bangladesh." When I asked Ahmed, he laughed at the idea. "ISIS wouldn't be able to find its way through Dhaka traffic!" The case that the murderers are homegrown fundamentalists, and their motives relate to the government's newly found determination to bring the killers of 1971 to justice is indeed strong. It's not hard to send a tweet claiming responsibility, which is how ISIS stakes its claims, or publish an article outlining how you're going to conquer a nation. And at the heart of ISIS's media strategy and projection of power is its exploitation of our fears of its potential reach. Yet it seems equally unlikely that ISIS wouldn't be recruiting operatives in Bangladesh, if only to lay the groundwork for a future operation. Hasina's public denials of any foreign involvement are potentially as dangerous as American arguments, at least as locals characterized them to me, that these murders are the work of foreign infiltrators.

In the wake of 9/11, US foreign policy became heavily distorted, suspecting Islamic terrorists everywhere while ignoring other, dangerously real threats. Today, in the wake of the Paris attacks and the rise of ISIS in Syria and Iraq, a similar process may be unfolding, where shades of gray are lost, and all the US is interested in seeing is ISIS cells. In 1971, the US took sides with West Pakistan against the creation of Bangladesh, and by proxy supported the massacre of hundreds of thousands, if not millions, of ordinary Bangladeshis. That history is not forgotten here, and a distrust of US policy makers lingers, especially those who might attempt to narrow their vision of what's happening here to their own short-term needs.

But not everyone believed religion was at the heart of the dispute.

"The murders really have nothing to do with what these guys wrote," Robin Ahasan, a publisher who shared a floor with Faisal Deepan, told me. He had received his own death threat a few days earlier, slipped as a handwritten note under his door. "None of that's controversial. These are arguments in Islam that were decided a century ago." It was a cramped, poorly ventilated office, and where he sat, Robin Ahasan was surrounded by unruly stacks of paper and books. "It's about economic power, here in Bangladesh," he insisted. "It's about getting it. It's about keeping it. They didn't die for their ideas; they died so someone else could get rich!"

We were driving to the lit fest's closing night party at a sprawling private residence when we got the news. The driver had been listening to the radio and briefly turned around. "It's done," was all he said. Ali Ahsan Mohammad Mujahid, Jamaat's number-two man, and Salahuddin Quader Chowdhury, a BNP lawmaker and one of opposition leader Zia's top aides, had just been hanged, within days of their final appeal being rejected. US officials had seriously objected to what they called the lack of a fair trial, with many key defense witnesses barred from taking the stand. The Bangladeshi writer Ahmed Ikhtisad acknowledged the problems with the trial but rationalized the court's lack of due process. "The thing you have to understand is that these were horrific killers," he said. "It's been forty years, and we've been waiting, and most people just want this over with."

I would be leaving two days later, and in my brief time in Bangladesh, I had spent most of it either at the hotel or on the protected grounds of the Dhaka Lit Fest, or being shuttled somewhere, often with an armed police escort for protection. What surprised me most was how easily I'd become accustomed to what on my first night had felt like an apocalyptic landscape. Now it felt ordinary, and I could understand how people simply lived here. As to the question of who killed Faisal Deepan, I realized the answer was less important than untangling the web of Islam, fanaticism, political rivalry, history, and power that had dominated Bangladesh. I had started with a simple question and soon found myself plunged into a story as complex and ambiguous as any Graham Greene could write.

On my last afternoon, I sat with the distinguished 77-year old novelist Hasan Azizul Huq by the hotel pool. He too was recently threatened. "Let them come and kill me," he said, "but if they do, they'll kill a free man." We talked for an hour, but not about the killings, or the rising influence of fundamentalist Islam, or the failures of this party or that party, but about writers and art, and the people we admired and who had influenced us and taught us something vital and beautiful about the world. It felt necessary, on my last day here, to breathe a little of the giddy and romantic air that had called for freedom of thought, freedom of religion, or freedom to just be—those freedoms that inspired the independence struggle of 1971, when Bangladesh was born.

Ranbir Singh Sidhu's debut novel Deep Singh Blue is out this month from Unnamed Press.

The VICE Morning Bulletin

$
0
0

A cracked iPhone (Photo by Håkan Dahlström via)

Everything you need to know about the world this morning, curated by VICE.

US NEWS

  • FBI Hacks Gunman's iPhone
    The FBI says it has cracked the encryption of the San Bernardino shooter's iPhone, and now has no need for Apple's help. The Department of Justice is set to withdraw its legal action against the company after an "outside method to bypass the locking function" proved successful. —USA Today
  • Obama to Expand Opioid Treatment
    The Obama administration wants to double the number of patients a doctor can treat with an opioid addiction medication, and expand training at medical schools. The proposed changes coincide with the president's visit to Atlanta, where he will participate in a panel discussion on addiction. —The New York Times
  • Utah Passes Abortion Anesthesia Bill
    Utah Governor Gary Herbert signed into law a bill requiring doctors to give anesthesia to women having an abortion at least 20 weeks into pregnancy. The bill is based on the disputed idea a fetus can feel pain at 20 weeks, but some doctors say it increases risks to women through unnecessary sedation.—NBC News
  • Gunman Charged After Capitol Shooting
    Larry Russell Dawson has been charged with assault with a deadly weapon and assault on a police officer after allegedly pointing a gun at police inside the Capitol Visitors Center in Washington DC. Dawson, 66, is in stable but critical condition after being shot by police. —The Washington Post

INTERNATIONAL NEWS

  • Egyptair Plane Hijacked, Hostages Freed
    An Egyptair domestic flight from Alexandria to Cairo was hijacked early Tuesday morning and landed in Cyprus. Flight MS181, an Airbus carrying 81 passengers, was taken over after a man said he was wearing an explosives belt. All hostages have been freed and the hijacker is now on his own on the plane. —BBC News
  • Suicide Bomber Kills Three in Baghdad
    A suicide bomber blew himself up on Tuesday morning in central Baghdad, killing three people and wounding 27 others. The blast happened in Tayaran Square, about a mile from a sit-in held by supporters of Shi'ite cleric Moqtada al-Sadr. No organization has yet claimed responsibility for the attack. —Reuters
  • Worst Bleaching Yet for Great Barrier Reef
    Australia's Great Barrier Reef is suffering from the worst coral bleaching ever recorded. The National Coral Bleaching Taskforce says 95 percent of reefs are now severely bleached, turned white by the lack of algae due to rising water temperatures.—The Sydney Morning Herald
  • Fire Engulfs UAE Towers
    A large fire has engulfed two residential towers in Ajman in the United Arab Emirates, north of Dubai. All residents have been evacuated as firefighters tackle the blaze, but some minor injuries have been reported. It is the third tower fire in the UAE in little more than a year. —Al Jazeera


A man on his phone, potentially working outside of work hours (Photo: Pexels via)

EVERYTHING ELSE

  • Teen Arrested Over Roswell UFO Theft
    A 17-year-old boy has been arrested for the theft of a model spaceship from outside the UFO Museum at Roswell, New Mexico. The teen is one of three suspects caught by cameras hauling the flying saucer into a pickup truck. —The Huffington Post
  • French Consider Right to Switch Off Work Email
    A controversial new bill in France could give workers the "right to disconnect" from email during off hours and vacations. If passed, it would require companies to encourage employees to turn off devices after they leave work. —USA Today
  • Women in Jail Denied Tampons
    A New York City councilwoman has introduced a package of bills aiming to make menstrual products free and widely available to female prisoners. Julissa Ferreras-Copeland says scarcity of pads and tampons are a health risk. —Broadly
  • Being Lazy Is Good for You
    A new study suggests lazy workers might not be entirely worthless. Professor Eisuke Hasegawa found laziness in ant colonies makes the group stronger: the lazy ants are good under pressure when harder-working ants get burnt out. —VICE

Done with reading for today? That's OK—instead, watch our new documentary How 'Sailor Moon' Fandom Became a Refuge for 90s Queer Kids.

Narcomania: How Governments Have Used the War on Drugs to Oppress Their Enemies

$
0
0

Sailors dousing a fire set by narcotics smugglers who'd hoped to escape and destroy the evidence. Photo: US Navy via Wikipedia

Next month, UN members will take part in the biggest discussion of drugs policy this century. So the revelation last week that Richard Nixon's war on drugs was supposedly a political tool crafted to clamp down on "the anti-war left and black people" is a timely one.

It's the kind of villainous plan you'd find in a pulp novel: a weapon of oppression, candy-coated as a mission to save the world's children from the evil of narcotics. It's not too far-fetched, as far as conspiracy theories go, because as the Watergate scandal proved, Nixon did have a soft spot for KGB-style politics (and, as multiple recordings proved, he was a big old racist.)

However, Nixon didn't invent the racist war on drugs. Many of America's early drug laws were specifically aimed at immigrants, a class of people—it was alleged by those in charge of the fledgling war on drugs—more prone to drug abuse than white people.

Harry J. Anslinger, head of the US Narcotics Bureau during the 1930s, said at the time: "There are one hundred thousand total marijuana smokers in the US, and most are negroes, Hispanics, Filipinos, and entertainers. Their Satanic music, jazz and swing, result from marijuana usage. This marijuana causes white women to seek sexual relations with negroes, entertainers, and any others."

You get the impression this guy felt he was missing out a little.

Police leading a man to their car after finding drugs on him during a stop and search. Photo by Jake Lewis

It's accepted that the war on drugs in America has disproportionally targeted black people, who are searched, arrested, convicted, and jailed—mainly for possession—at far higher rates than their white counterparts. The same can be said in the UK, where black people are six times more likely to be stopped and searched than white people.

Oppression isn't just defined along racial lines, though. In the war on drugs—as we know from the case of the Rausings, the superrich couple with a $14 million Chelsea mansion who were let off with a police caution after being caught with a large stash of heroin, crack, and powder cocaine—the poor are also victimized by the drug laws. Research by the LSE found those in the highest socio-economic class—people like bankers, doctors, and lawyers—are three times more likely to be let off with a caution for drug offenses than the unemployed.

If you are a lowly drug user in Britain, you are fair game. A former undercover cop who disguised himself as a crack addict in order to gain access to top end dealers told me: "It made me realize how bad cops can be to drug addicts. I was abused, assaulted, and threatened with being fitted up by having drugs planted on me on a regular basis."

In Russia, home to the highest number of injecting drug users in the world, trumped up drug offenses are used by police as an excuse to beat, torture, and rape vulnerable drug users and sex workers.

In Thailand in 2003, thousands of "undesirables" (mainly the homeless, orphans, drug addicts, and petty dealers) were rounded up and locked in rehab centers or prisons up as part of a national war on drugs by Prime Minister Thaksin Shinawatra, who later had a spell as owner of Manchester City football club. During the purge, there were 2,800 extrajudicial killings, although half the victims had no connection to drugs.

In Iran, the war on drugs is used as a way to quietly bump off enemies of the state or helpless Afghani refugees by planting drugs on them and then hanging them. Research by human rights charity Reprieve found evidence in Iran—whose drug police are part funded by the UN—that "drug charges may be used as a pretext for persecuting and executing political dissidents." It said exiles and human rights monitors allege that "many persons supposedly executed for criminal offenses, such as narcotics trafficking, were political dissidents." In the first half of 2015, according to a report by drug charity Harm Reduction International, there were an estimated 570 executions in Iran, of which 394 people (69 percent) were allegedly drug offenders. After anti-government protests in 2009 and 2010, execution doubled, with most killed under the banner of being drug criminals.

A sisa user smoking the drug in Athens. Photo from 'Sisa–Cocaine of the Poor'

"The global drug enforcement system is disproportionately penalizing vulnerable and marginalized people," says Dan Dolan from Reprieve, which assists those facing the death penalty. "These people are never the drug barons or kingpins governments claim to be targeting. In most cases, they are low-level drug carriers or mules, selected for their expendability. In almost all cases, they suffer from intellectual disability, addiction, or severe economic disadvantage."

Considering the systematic failings of the war on the drugs, it's no surprise that some politicians feel they have become contaminated and need to confess their guilt, or their newfound opposition to it. There's been a steady stream of senior politicians who have admitted, after leaving office, that the drug laws they helped put into action are, on a human level, a disgrace.

Despite spending three years as Britain's senior minister in charge of drug policy between 2001 and 2003, the former Labour MP Bob Ainsworth surprised everyone in 2010 when, as a back bencher, he declared that the war on drugs was a failure and that we needed to legalize drugs instead. Labour officials quickly branded his comments "extremely irresponsible." When asked why he did not speak up when he was in a position of power, Ainsworth said: "As you can see from the reaction this morning, if I was now a shadow minister, Ed Miliband would be asking me to resign."

Once a politician drifts away from the seat of power towards the back benches, the symptoms of this strange form of drugs omertà—where senior ministers are banned from speaking out—appear to dissipate.

Mo Mowlam, a former Labour cabinet minister responsible for drugs policy, called for total global legalization in 2002. Labour Cabinet ministers Clare Short, Tony Banks, and Roy Jenkins turned. As did former Tory Cabinet ministers Michael Portillo, Alan Duncan, Ken Baker, Nigel Lawson, and Peter Lilley, who said: "The young, the ethnic minorities who come into contact with these laws, who know they are ridiculous, would look at us in a different light if we had the realism to do so."

Some, like David Cameron, have to rein in previously held liberal views when they gain power. However, former Liberal Democrat leader Nick Clegg, during his time as deputy prime minister in the last government, was able to speak out. So I asked Clegg—who has written a chapter, alongside Sir Richard Branson, calling for wholesale reform in a new book called Ending the War on Drugs—why most politicians in government feel they are unable to talk honestly about drug policy. "The basic dynamic is fear—of the tabloids, mainly," he said. "But I would say a bigger problem now is not fear, but complacency—ministers tend to feel there's no pressing need to change things."

Unsurprisingly, the most fervent anti-drug war campaigners on the global stage are former senior politicians from countries that have been ruined under prohibition, such as former Mexican President Vicente Fox, who has called for the legalization of drugs to end violence and corruption.

Sorry if I'm shattering any illusions here, but the global war on drugs has never really been a massive laser gun fight between Team America–style heroes and an army of evil-eyed, hairy monsters called Cocaine, Cannabis, and Heroin. The language of public discourse is that drugs are given beast-like qualities: They take over entire villages, creep into schools, and enslave the vulnerable. Their powers of persuasion are legendary, a living, breathing scourge.

Back in the real world, the war on drugs is—as those who have been beaten, jailed, oppressed, and executed as a result—a war on people. The decision makers at the UN's global drug policy discussion in New York next month would do well to have a little think about that before they—like the vast majority of the UK's politicians—agree that the status quo is a reasonable place to be.

Follow Narcomania on Twitter.


What It’s Like Inside an Eerie Children’s Psychiatric Hospital Turned ‘Opportunity Centre’

$
0
0


All photos by Kâté Braydon

The former Dr. William F. Roberts Hospital School in Saint John, N.B., like any slightly run-down former hospital from the mid-1960s, has a certain creepy, institutional vibe. Until the province shut it down in 1985, it housed hundreds of young wards of the province with mental and physical disabilities. But overcrowding, underfunding, and good-old-fashioned ignorance of how to treat such complex cases also made it a breeding ground for neglect and abuse. In the 90s, two ex-employees pled guilty to 14 sexual abuse charges involving former residents. Other allegations were settled out of court.

Given the former hospital's dark history, the cemetery across the street, and its view of the grey ocean, one can see why some people say it's haunted.

Others might wonder why a former children's psychiatric facility with a such tragic past hasn't been abandoned or torn down. Now, however, it's a commercial and retail space called the Maritime Opportunity Centre. Doug Leavitt, a maintenance man who's worked there for nearly 30 years, says he's heard of people seeing strange apparitions and hearing echoes in the halls of the 260,000-square-foot facility. "An engineer told me he saw a little girl walking up the hallway carrying a blanket. And she disappeared. She walked right through the wall," he says.

"Some people are scared to come in here," says Dave Biron, who now owns and leases out the space. Although many areas have been renovated and the place is kept clean, the centre looks "basically the same as it did when it was a hospital," according to Biron. The rooms formerly occupied by young patients—in wings A, C, and E—have been renovated and rented out. The auditorium and chapel were emptied long ago. Still, some swear there are unhappy spirits hanging around, making strange sounds late at night.

On our tour, we encounter the engineer who told Doug Leavitt he saw the ghost of a little girl roaming the halls. I ask him if he's ever seen anything creepy.

"Nothing you could explain," he says. Like what? He pauses at length.

"Kids."

Before I could ask more, he suddenly has to take an urgent phone call and disappears into the boiler room. Alrighty then.

The circuitous wings, metal grates on the doors, and institutional colour palette of weathered 1970s blue, brown, and beige all bear witness to the building's former life. Seemingly endless corridors stretch toward heavy, reinforced doorways. ("It's a lot of wasted space," says Biron.) One of the disused former "quiet rooms," a windowless brick cell that measures about ten feet by six feet, adjoins a bathroom outfitted in lurid pink and green tiles. Notable is the size of the bathtubs, sinks, and toilets, specifically designed for tiny physiques.

One former dormitory for residents has been converted into a doggie daycare. Barking echoes off the cement floors. Leavitt points to the white storage cubbies on the walls, which formerly stored the belongings of several dozen children who slept in this room. As we make our way down the hallways, he gestures to another door.

"This here's interesting. This used to be the morgue," he says. "I can't take you in there, though." Gotta wonder how the trade union renting the space feels about that.

After the hospital was closed in the 1980s, the provincial government "didn't want anything more to do with it," according to Biron. A group of engineers purchased it with plans to open a trade centre, but the project fizzled out. Repurposing the former hospital as a commercial and storage space has proven an innovative, if unusual, way of reversing what would likely have been an unremittingly sad story concluding with a wrecking ball. Saint John's even-more-famously-creepy psychiatric hospital, Centracare, as well as its Old General Hospital, were both acquired by private purchasers and subsequently demolished in the 1990s.

"I'm sure if we didn't take it on it would have been bulldozed years ago," says Biron.

This year, the Maritime Opportunity Centre is marking 30 years in business—which means that it's been a commercial and storage space longer than it was a hospital. "There are 40 businesses here now, all of them locally-owned," says leasing agent Gina Hooley, who refers to the eclectic cohort of tradespeople, chemical manufacturers, veterinary services, caterers, and artists who rent out the space as a "family." Plus, she says, "we have some of the lowest lease rates in town."

Still, walking through the long, empty hallways, one can sometimes catch weird echoes, or seem to detect the (almost certainly psychosomatic) scent of iodoform disinfectant. Despite the creep factor, Biron swears he's the only spectre haunting the place. "They think there are remnants of tortured people here—from when they had the crazy people locked up," he says with a laugh.

"I'm in here late all the time and I never heard nothin' roaming the halls."

Follow Julia Wright on Twitter.





I Got High at Jimi Hendrix's House to See if His Spirit Would Possess Me

$
0
0

The author in Hendrix's house. Photos by Sandi Hudson-Francis

I used to have long hair and wear bad jeans and had this extremely shitty red velvet jacket I basically lived in, so the uncomfortable question, "Are you into Hendrix, man?" has been asked of me a lot. And, of all those times I've been asked it, I don't think I've once answered the question honestly. It's an awkward thing: acknowledging the man as a legend but also being sort of completely unfamiliar with any of his oeuvre. On my first high school casual dress day, a German teacher mistook my bootcut jeans for Hendrix enthusiasm and I had to spend three years doing weak thumbs up and saying, "Yeah man, hot licks" while he cornered me in hallways to whisper excitedly about Purple Haze.

It's not just Hendrix, though. The truth is, if you own more than 12 albums and one of them isn't Dark Side of the Moon, Sgt Pepper's, or Led Zeppelin I, it's assumed you're either an idiot or a contrarian douchebag. But sometimes it's really difficult to love the things people tell you to, and I just never got Hendrix. Don't get me wrong: I tried. As a tubby 14-year-old I used to listen to Electric Ladyland in my bedroom thinking, 'Come on, this is important.' Ten years on, I'll hear a Hendrix record and still feel nothing.

To be honest I hadn't really thought about him for a while, but then I saw that a London apartment lived in by Hendrix was opening to the public. People would be able to visit the Brook Street abode he called "the first real home of his own," restored to the exact state he left it in i.e. lots of lava lamps and joss sticks. Stories of the streams of musicians, journalists, and artists like Ginger Baker and George Harrison flocking up its narrow staircases fossilized the year he spent there from '68–'69 in folklore, but the place was already part of music consciousness.

One of the reasons Hendrix went there in the first place was because the composer Handel called it home for 36 years in the 18th century, and he enjoyed his best years there: writing and performing his opus 'Messiah' and eventually dying in those same four walls. Despite 240 years separating the two, there's a story that brings them together. Brushing his teeth in the bathroom mirror one night before bed, Hendrix was visited by Handel's ghost. This didn't send him into hiding for a few days like it would most reasonable people, but inspired him. Brook Street gained a reputation as a sort of mecca for the creative spirit.

So I thought: why don't I go there with an acoustic guitar, pound out some hot licks, and see if it will finally make me 'get' Hendrix?

Here's how I saw it going: I pictured myself in a dressing gown, brushing my teeth and asking Jimi, Handel, Dr. Sam Beckett, and Nearly Headless Nick if they'd mind prizing open the crevices of my frazzled millennial brain then whispering the secrets of the creative spirit into it. I wanted to make the same pilgrimage into the depths of musical genius that they took, so with the vague hope of a tour, I emailed Hendrix's trust. After a little back-and-forth, I was served a plate of the frankly ridiculous: an invitation to spend over an hour, alone, inside. With just 24 hours to prepare, I got to recreating the same conditions that inspired Jimi's visions that day. This was my one shot at a face-to-face encounter with inspiration at its source, so I decided to make my body a temple.

As the old saying goes: if you want to think like a Hendrix, you've got to feel like a Hendrix. So after some extensive research (see above), I set some restrictions. A 14-year-old's diet of energy drinks and Airwaves gum gave me with the kind of sugared glaze needed to go through the rite of passage of staying up until 4 AM to play along to a Hendrix album many years too late. I awoke as a malnourished, tired man with sore fingers: Hendrix lives. Well, almost. A big part of him, his music, and that experience with Handel was all that acid. That felt a bit exotic for a Tuesday, so I dragged Hendrix's habit into 21st century London and swung by Boots for some diphenhydramine hydrochloride. Heavy-legged after nothing to eat for a day, very little sleep, and 250mg of that stuff, and I was ready.

I walked down a slight alleyway and up a set of steep stairs, until I found myself in the room for the first time. Before I knew it, the doors shut behind me and I was alone. Fuck, it's pretty small. Look how tiny the bed is! I don't know why, but I expected Jimi, a man who chose to have tens of naked women emblazoned on the gatefold of his most popular LP and whose penis cast recently appeared at an exhibition, to sleep on a 17ft long mattress shaped like a python.

I don't care what they say about carbon monoxide gas heaters and asbestos: apartments were curious, amazing places in the sixties. Built on a cross-hatching of blankets and rugs, distasteful statuettes hung from poorly vanished windowsills while a faux-fireplace precariously warmed the back of a television. Hidden behind Hendrix's custom made heavyset curtains, this place certainly felt like an oasis.

There's nothing normal about thumbing through a dead man's fully-reconstructed record collection and feeling his silent judgements over your shoulder. I slipped on a pair of headphones, lay down, and started blaring the English Chamber Orchestra's version of Handel's 'Messiah,' just like Hendrix used to. With their shivering gravity and groping movements, I felt those idiosyncratic chants like they would've resonated through these walls when conjured here hundreds of years ago. With the hard wood of the floor on my back, I sensed his presence cradling me. Standing up, I stared into the mirror.

But we all know that you can't summon the ghost of baroque composers on an empty stomach, so I dug out my Hendrix-themed packed lunch. While Jimi survived on chips, apples, cigarettes, and the odd sandwich, today it would have been a different story. Living in Mayfair, he'd have broken up his day with carrots and a side of apple, cucumber, celery, and lime juice from somewhere like Pret, probably. It's funny, really, because that happens to be my lunch too. Two bites of the carrot and, as if by magic, the atmosphere has dissipated. In a fit of frustration, I tossed the headphones on the bed.

Laying there, staring up at me as if it just crept in, was Jimi's Epiphone FT79. The very guitar on which Hendrix put together 'All Along The Watchtower'; what he wrote the likes of 'Room Full of Mirrors', 'Valleys of Neptune,' and 'Hey Baby' with; something that was, in the words of his girlfriend at the time, Kathy Etchingham, "always within an arm's reach, usually beside the bed." Something he would turn to in his hour of need, offering me a helping hand. Staring, the pulsating bars of 'Foxy Lady' throbbed in my head.

With its infectious rhythms cycling, I started up Garageband and liberated my fingers. Moments passed; elevated into the stratosphere, even. In this kick drum, snare, and cowbell sample, there was nothing but truth and emotion. This is what it means to be Hendrix. I felt his spirit coursing through my veins. If I didn't have eight months left on my contract and no insurance, I would've set my phone alight.

I reached for my guitar. Everything has led up to this point. And staring at the same fret board I've seen a million times, something came out of me... I start strumming out the opening chords to Turin Brakes' 'Painkiller.' I never imagined that what the spirit of Hendrix might conjure would be a song I've never known how to play, haven't heard in years, and don't even like.

Before long, my time was up and I had to leave. I walked out into the sore air of Mayfair, not exactly imbued with the spirit to run home and write the next 'Voodoo Child' or 'Messiah,' but still I sensed enlightenment. Do I feel closer to his work now? Of course. Imagine chilling out and listening to your own breath where an enigma used to brush their teeth, scratch their ass cheeks, and rest their head at night, and not feeling that way. But my prevailing feeling was the surprise that the apartment was not a relic or temple but a home, and the greatest gift it gave Hendrix was a rare sense of belonging. It is the perfect porthole to a moment that has never seemed less apposite than today; a sort of physical embodiment of Hendrix's music and legend. A monument to hot, hot licks.

Follow Oobah Butler on Twitter.

The Inventor of Cigarette Filters Just Invented Three-Dimensional Chess

$
0
0

Ramón Galindo with his latest invention. All images courtesy of Ramón Galindo.


This article was originally published on VICE Spain.

Who, you ask, invented the filter on your cigarette? Not, I'll tell you, some eccentric inventor who became a millionaire off of it, got remarried to a model who could have been his daughter, and subsequently tragically died in a drug-fueled freak accident on his yacht.

The inventor of the cigarette filter is a very nice elderly man from Barcelona, who sold his idea for the cigarette filter to the tobacco industry, in exchange for life-long employment for his entire family. Ramón Galindo, who is also responsible for the shape of the handles on ping pong paddles and a ton of other things, has spent the last 60 years inventing. His latest creation is a game of chess for more than two players at a time. We talked to him about stolen patents, the perks of getting a job instead of a pile of money, and how the world has changed since he came to it.

One of the first filters for cigarettes

VICE: How did you first come up with the idea for cigarette filters?
Ramón Galindo: In 1958, my then-girlfriend (who is now my wife) worked for a tobacconist, and in those days, there weren't any manufactured cigarettes. People would buy tobacco from her and roll them by hand. If they used filters, they'd be mouthpieces. Seeing that, I thought that an incorporated mouthpiece would be so much easier. I made different filters in different sizes, and presented the idea to Tabacos de Filipinas who had an office in Barcelona. They, in turn, presented it to Philip Morris in England. It was exactly the same filter used today, but made from cotton.

How old were you at the time?
I was nineteen and studying to become an electrician and mechanic. But at the same time, I was working for my father, who made table-tennis bats. In fact, the first idea I ever put into practice was when changing the straight handle for a wedge-shaped one, in 1956. That was to allow for a more powerful strike and to make the grip better.

Did you patent it?
No, those were different times. We had Franco in Spain, and patents weren't even considered because the country was so isolated from the world.

Did you get paid for your inventions?
Well, in the case of the cigarette filters, I didn't ask for money in exchange for the invention but a guarantee that my family and I would always have work in the tobacco sector. Tabacalera Española gave us that guarantee, and we still have family members working in the tobacco industry. My wife worked in the industry for forty years. One of our sons, three of my brothers, cousins, my wife's family, and myself worked in the sector for ten years, but later changed to technology and other areas.

So revolutionizing the tobacco industry didn't make you a millionaire?
I'm the kind of inventor that has to go knocking on doors in order to convince and negotiate. It's different when you work for the research and development department of the multinational company responsible for getting the product on the market. But it was a great deal—a patent only lasts twenty-five years, while we have had secure jobs since 1959. An invention like that doesn't make anyone a millionaire. In fact, if I invent something, it can easily be copied by making only a few alterations. That always happens to inventors in this country.

Has anyone ever copied one of your inventions?
I once made an improvement to hi-fi systems: There were two types of hi-fi systems at the time, and each system had fixed wattage. I made an improvement by adding a pre-amplifier, which still exists today, so that modules of twenty watts could be added continuously. That meant we could install a sound system in a football stadium. It was copied by a large telecom company. I reported it and sued them, so for a while I had to spend eight hours in court a day, and I had to ask for permission to take time off from work every time. I had to pay a lawyer to take on their legal department. In the end, we settled, but that did take a toll on me.

When I invented a way in which the lights on cars automatically turn on when you drive into a tunnel, and presented it at the International Exhibition of Inventions in Geneva I received an award. I also presented it to a car manufacturer, and after some time, it appeared in cars. I had taken on the telephone company, but I wasn't ready to go through that against a multinational again. I had no energy for it, so I left it.

Which one of your inventions are you most proud of?
Definitely those dedicated to special needs education or medicine. In 1965, I was part of a team that was responsible for the first kidney transplant performed in Spain. And in 1973, I worked on a project where I improved the lenses on endoscopes, so we were able to film inside the vaginal cavity of a pregnant woman with a tumor for the first time.

How do you work?
As an inventor, you'll notice something in everyday life that's not working as well of efficiently as it could, and it sticks with you. So three months later, you suddenly come up with a solution to what you saw lacking. I have a workshop where I develop my ideas. I usually work alone, or if a project is so complex I'll need to cooperate with a company, I'll work together with their employees.

Do you get nervous when you present prototypes?
Oh, I always get very nervous—but I've presented and won awards in places like Brussels, Taiwan, Kuwait, and more recently, Pittsburgh. I'm representing my country, and I'm presenting the prototypes to juries made up of people from all over the world. The last time I presented something—a game of three-dimensional chess—there were members of the WHO, WIPO, and UNESCO present.

What, exactly, is a three-dimensional chess game?
It's a type of chess that allows double games of two against two to be played. According to UNESCO, it is also an educational tool for the prevention of degenerative brain conditions. We are now looking to extend it to checkers, Chinese chess, and other board games traditionally played by two players. You could easily play it on your laptop or mobile, too. There are millions of people who play chess, so imagine the potential if only one percent of those people were to play our new style. But we haven't found an investor to help us get this on the market yet.

You've seen a lot of things change, over the years.
Technology moves so quickly. In a way, I understand why people my age don't adapt when everything changes so fast. There are people alive today who had to travel miles on horseback to get to a village, where you had to queue to be able to make a call. These days, you can be in the United States in a few hours and Facetime your loved ones to let them know you've arrived safely, the moment you get there. I don't know how long it'll take before flying cars are a thing, but getting on a car that'll just take you to your destination without you having to do anything is just around the corner.

Meet the Muslims Suing the Cops for Their Own Surveillance Records

$
0
0

On paper and sitting next to each other, Talib Abdur-Rashid and Samir Hashmi don't seem to have much in common. Abdur-Rashid is a 64-year-old black man, an imam at a Harlem mosque who wears a kufi and speaks passionately about social justice. Hashmi, 27, is a soft-spoken Pakistani grad student from New Jersey, a business major who dresses like one.

But both men have strong suspicions they were spied on by the New York Police Department's infamous "Demographics Unit"—a surveillance program set up after the 9/11 terrorist attacks that labeled entire mosques as terrorist organizations. Hashmi figures his involvement in the Muslim Student Association at Rutgers University placed him squarely in NYPD crosshairs, and as a prominent figure in the New York Muslim community who hasn't exactly been invisible politically, Abdur-Rashid can't help but suspect he's a target, too.

Now both men are suing the NYPD for surveillance records on themselves in what transparency advocates say is an unprecedented case about government secrecy. Public records experts believe the suit is pivotal because the cops will neither confirm nor deny whether the records Hashmi and Abdur-Rashid seek even exist—a response that's common among national security agencies but has never before been established by state or local law enforcement.

This is also the first time state courts in New York have weighed in on this kind of broad claim to secrecy. (The NYPD in January settled two federal lawsuits over the spying itself, as opposed to records of it.) A panel of judges in the appellate division of the New York Supreme Court heard oral arguments in both Hashmi and Abdur-Rashid's cases earlier this month. If the judges rule in favor of the NYPD, they will create a brick wall where none existed before. But advocates see a chance to check the drip of secrecy doctrines from the federal government down to the local level.

Of course, for Hashmi and Abdur-Rashid, the case is really just about the dignity of two United States citizens.

"I wanted to see exactly what . The fact that it has filtered out to local police is troubling, because Glomar leaves the public not even knowing what they don't know."

How Hashmi and Abdur-Rashid's cases play out could impact not just the news-gathering ability of investigative reporters, but the ability of regular citizens to keep their government in check. "For me, as a Pakistani, I felt singled out, but surveillance isn't just a Muslim issue," Hashmi says.

"It's an American issue now," he continues. "We see the NYPD has all types of surveillance and all types of powers, and they're going unchecked. They need to be questioned, and there needs to be a system in place to make sure they aren't abusing their powers."

Follow CJ Ciaramella on Twitter.

Convicted Pedophile and 'Jeepers Creepers' Creator Puts Out Disturbing Casting Call

$
0
0

Victor Salva's mugshot over a shot from 'Jeepers Creepers II'

Convicted pedophile and creator of the Jeepers Creepers films, 57-year-old Victor Salva, has been criticized after launching a casting call for an 18-year-old to play the part of a 13-year-old girl who flees her abusive grandfather.

After the Canadian Union of British Columbia Performers (UBCP), a local actors' union, released a notice detailing Salva's past, the advertisement for the role in the upcoming Jeepers Creepers III was removed from breakdownservices.com, the casting website it had been posted on.

In the message, the UBCP drew attention to Salva's conviction in 1988 for the molestation of 12-year-old Nathan Forrest Winters, an actor in two of his films. Winters was abused while shooting the 1989 film Clownhouse, and Salva filmed one of the encounters. He was sentenced to three years in state prison and served 15 months.

After the UBCP posted its message—which reminded members that "a performer has the right to refuse work if they believe the nature of the work is unsafe"—the website Salva's casting call was posted to removed the message and posted a statement:

"Upon learning of this notice and our own verification of the facts surrounding Salva's conviction, Breakdown Services has removed this project from its files... All submissions made by any agent on this project are no longer available to the casting director nor any member of the production staff."

Following his release and parole, Salva stayed away from Hollywood filmmaking for a couple of years, before returning in 1995 with Powder, the premiere of which was picketed by his victim, Nathan Winters. In 2001, he wrote and directed the horror movie Jeepers Creepers, which broke the record for the highest ever grossing Labor Day weekend release. Jeepers Creepers III will be Salva's first major studio film since Jeepers Creepers II in 2003.

In 2006, when promoting his film Peaceful Warrior, Salva made a statement in the LA Times seeking forgiveness:

"I pled guilty to a terrible crime, and I've spent the rest of my life trying to make up for it. For almost twenty years, I've been involved with helping others, I've been in therapy, and I've made movies. But I paid my debt to society and apologized to the young man. And all I can hope is that people will give me a chance to redeem myself."

Viewing all 38002 articles
Browse latest View live




Latest Images