Quantcast
Channel: VICE CA
Viewing all 38002 articles
Browse latest View live

Neckbeard: Nickelodeon's Slimy Nineties

$
0
0

[body_image width='1024' height='768' path='images/content-images/2014/11/11/' crop='images/content-images-crops/2014/11/11/' filename='remembering-sliming-on-nickelodeon-body-image-1415739859.jpg' id='3053']
​Photos courtesy of  ​Nick.com

Coolio. Danny Tamberelli. Jesse Camp. Lori Beth Denberg. Amanda Bynes. Richard Simmons... All of these people have something in common—they've all been slimed.

The  falling green goop was a defining characteristic of Nickelodeon from the 80s onward. The first official sliming, as far as I can tell, comes from the first episode of You Can't Do That on Television, which originally aired on CJOH-TV in Ottawa in 1979. During a skit where a kid is chained u​p for detention in a dungeon, he's told not to pull on his shackles. When he does, a toilet flushes and the signature green slime that has become so ubiquitous with Nickelodeon pours down on his head. It's a great gag that brought on two decades of slop.

An apocryphal story about that scene and the creation of the green slime comes from Mathew Klickstein's Slimed! An Oral History of Nickelodeon's Golden Age. Geoffrey Darby, producer of You Can't Do That on Television, explained that the slime was never meant to be slime. They'd prepared a bucket of food slop to dump on the kid's head. After waiting for a week due to unexpected delays, "...there were eight inches of green crud growing over the top of the bucket." But time was running too short to make a new bucket of refuse. "We had to get the scene. We couldn't get more slop... So we said, Dump it on the kid anyway."

[youtube src='//www.youtube.com/embed/PcawVlirj60' width='100%' height='315']

After seeing the scene, I'm dubious. The slime doesn't look like rotten and moldy food. And who would dump that on a kid? (I t's worth noting that Klickstein went on to give a career-killing​ racist and sexist interview while promoting his book.)

As You Can't Do That on Television grew in popularity, the show became one of the first major purchases of Nickelodeon. Unsure of who their target audience was, Nickelodeon ran syndicated episodes of the Canadian show all the time. It was a huge hit that helped define the early days of the channel. As the series progressed, one thing was abundantly clear—kids loved the slime.

The use of slime spread to other shows. In Double Dare, kids faced off against slime during many of the most memorable "physical challenges." Slipping and sliding around a sound stage, the knee-pad clad kids did everything from shoving their arms up giant noses to letting a Nickelodeon blimp dump slime on them—all in an effort to collect those elusive red flags and win the game. In Wild and Crazy Kids, a competition show for kids that encouraged playing outside, the three kid-hosts got slimed while announcing contests and awarding prizes. Slime became so synonymous with the network, the green stuff even flowed during commercial "bumps" and interstitial ads.

[youtube src='//www.youtube.com/embed/OR3PZTRxHDU' width='100%' height='315']

Eventually, the network cashed on slime and started hawking it to kids in various goofy spin-off products. Nickelodeon Slime Shampoo, by Fisher-Price, became all the rage when it pretty much invented the kids haircare market in the late 80s. And toy sales of a Nick-branded slimy substance, Gak, soared in the 1990s (and is ​still on sale today). As Erik Davis reported in t​he Village Vo​ice in 1993, "Last year, Gak was Mattel's best-selling product, and this year the company estimates it will sell 8 million 'splats'—the air-tight plastic containers that package Gak." 

From 1990 until the mid 2000s, the best place to get slimed was at Nickelodeon Studios in Orlando, Florida. It was a hybrid of a soundstage and a theme park, where they held tapings of shows like Double Dare, Clarissa Explains It All, Legends of the Hidden Temple, and much more. There was also a lot of slime. One attraction known as the "Slime Geyser" spewed the green stuff into the air, while the tapings of live shows that encouraged audience participation kept the kids soaked in it. 

Lori Beth Denberg is an expert on the green goop. By the time she joined the network in 1994, slime "was already an institution." She got drenched in the stuff during her tenure on All That and the slime-happy gameshow Figure It Out.

She poo-pooed Darby's account, telling me there was no rotten food in slime. "The party line that they would tell kids was that slime was mined from the center of the Earth... The true gloppy slime was oatmeal and applesauce and green food color. A good slime, if it was just oatmeal, would 'plop.' I haven't found whatever it was in there that made it loosen up and ooze."

The actress, who now officiates w​eddings and stars in​ indie films, explained that the slime they used to get doused in was a bit of a nuisance. "The green color would just stain your bras and underwear forever." According to her, your best bet was to, "Sit straight up or lean back a little bit... If you're gonna get slimed, get slimed. Don't curl up in a ball and let it run down your back... into your buttcrack."

Applesauce and slimy butts aside, it's still a wonder how sliming became such a phenomenon.  Heather Lappi, a school psychologist in Philadelphia, offered me an explanation for why young people were so obsessed with the green stuff. "In school and at home, children are accustomed to structure. From the moment they wake until bedtime each night, their day is planned down to the minute. Watching another child get slimed or messy and knowing that the child is not going to get grounded or have to clean up the mess is very alluring."

But it may not just be the wild nature of seeing a big mess that excites kids, added Lappi: "Some may argue that getting slimed is a sort of comedy that experts (all the way back to Plato and Aristotle) call the superiority theory of humor. We laugh about misfortunes of others (schadenfreude), because these misfortunes assert our superiority over their shortcomings. Although sliming is arguably less intense than what our great philosophers were eluding to, humans, even the ones with the best intentions, often instinctively laugh first and help second when another experiences misfortune."

[youtube src='//www.youtube.com/embed/fL2JbTwwfAY' width='100%' height='315']

Unfortunately, sliming ain't what it used to be.  With the so-called "Glory Days" of Nickelodeon waning (num​bers took a sharp downturn in 2012), slime has been relegated to award sho​ws and YouTu​be clips. The Nickelodeon Studios theme park, where kids could go to get slimed in real life, was shut down in 2004. The only place to get doused in green goo seems to be a N​ickelodeon-themed resort in Orlando where water-park games include the occasional sliming.

The kids who grew up in the 90s still have now become nostalgic for all things Nickelodeon—including the slime. There's a live-streaming website dedicated to Nick re​runs where you can watch countless hours of slimming. And there have been innumerable petitions to bring back Nickelodeon's original slime-laden 90s-era programming.

[youtube src='//www.youtube.com/embed/xErPI2MxIJc' width='100%' height='315']

This reverence among millennials for the slime era makes some sense. According to author Carl Wilson in his 2011 essay "My So-Called Adulthood," "... nostalgia is a glue that reinforces bonds of solidarity and shared experience. It's especially helpful if you're careful to recall that the time in question was hell as much as heaven."

Maybe if we think about Zubaz at the same time as we remember old episodes of Pete & Pete, we'll come out of our reverie with a clearer picture of our nascent years. Were the 1990s kind of slimy? Sure, but as Lori Beth Denberg told me on the phone, "Don't hide from the slime, embrace it." 

Follow Giaco Furino on ​Twitter


New York's Only Free Art School Held a Nacho-Filled Fundraiser

$
0
0


[body_image width='1000' height='1500' path='images/content-images/2014/11/11/' crop='images/content-images-crops/2014/11/11/' filename='how-the-bruce-high-quality-foundation-university-used-nachos-to-fund-its-fifth-year-body-image-1415748926.jpg' id='3075']

Last week, the Bruce High Quality Fou​ndation held a benefit to fund it's free ​art school, BHQFU. The bash was named Not for Profit, and it hosted a throng of New York art world denizens, both fancy and cool. Guests were treated to champagne and Belvedere vodka, alongside nachos served in a broken umbrella. Fresh layers of chips, beans, hot cheese, and sour cream were added on the spot, but the pristine hors d'oeuvre evolved into a more gestural artwork before the night was through. Think of it as action painting con queso.

[body_image width='1000' height='667' path='images/content-images/2014/11/11/' crop='images/content-images-crops/2014/11/11/' filename='how-the-bruce-high-quality-foundation-university-used-nachos-to-fund-its-fifth-year-body-image-1415749018.jpg' id='3076']

More than just a benefit, this party celebrated the BHQFU's new status as a 501(c)(3) nonprofit status, which means donations to the organization are tax-deductible. The fundraiser took place in Brooklyn, at BHQ's studio in Sunset Park. The space was peppered with original art by the collective, including screen prints, sculptures, and impressive doughy iterations of life-size Greek statues. Artist Dev Hynes headlined as Blood Orange, playing an intimate solo show with just his keyboard and electric guitar. Hynes recently became affiliated with the school after realizing that he lived fatefully close to it. Asked if he might teach a class, Hynes said, "Yeah, but I don't know what I'd teach. It may sound weird, but I have really crippling stage fright and the idea of getting up in front of a bunch of art kids and talking is terrifying to me." Of the school itself, Hynes told me, "It's pretty amazing that they've set up this whole university, and it's real. There's real people doing really cool things there, you know? It's so positive."

[body_image width='1000' height='667' path='images/content-images/2014/11/11/' crop='images/content-images-crops/2014/11/11/' filename='how-the-bruce-high-quality-foundation-university-used-nachos-to-fund-its-fifth-year-body-image-1415749047.jpg' id='3077']

The Bruce High Quality Foundation aims "to foster an alternative to everything."Created and managed entirely by an anonymous, rotating crew of Cooper Union grads, BHQ is an art collective named after deceased fictional artist Bruce High Quality (RIP). "The Bruces" create subversive and sometimes silly art that is a direct response to the self-serious pretentiousness of the art world. Right now they're in the process of recreating the Metropolitan Museum of Art's entire Greek and Roman collection in Play-Doh.

[body_image width='1000' height='667' path='images/content-images/2014/11/11/' crop='images/content-images-crops/2014/11/11/' filename='how-the-bruce-high-quality-foundation-university-used-nachos-to-fund-its-fifth-year-body-image-1415749068.jpg' id='3078']

[body_image width='1000' height='667' path='images/content-images/2014/11/11/' crop='images/content-images-crops/2014/11/11/' filename='how-the-bruce-high-quality-foundation-university-used-nachos-to-fund-its-fifth-year-body-image-1415749086.jpg' id='3079']

According to the artists, it's "a learning experiment, in the sense that we are trying out ways to learn from each other. We're evaluating the results as we go, and we're refining our approach. We don't expect to develop the perfect method. But we do intend to continually perfect our method." The informal university is completely free and volunteer-based. "Students are teachers are administrators are staff," as the group says, and everyone is there to learn with and from one another. 

[body_image width='1000' height='667' path='images/content-images/2014/11/11/' crop='images/content-images-crops/2014/11/11/' filename='how-the-bruce-high-quality-foundation-university-used-nachos-to-fund-its-fifth-year-body-image-1415749332.jpg' id='3080']

The last free art school in New York (since Cooper Union now charges ​tuit​ion), BHQFU started with next to nothing, and now holds nine crowded classes a semester. An ever-anonymous founding Bruce member who we can only refer to here as "The Bruces J" said of the classes, "To even call them classes doesn't really explain what is going on: They are community conversations about different aspects of art-making today. Every day of the week people are hashing out the realities of working with sculpture, painting, poetry, video, collage, comedy. We bring in some of the most established artists in the world and we bring in artists at the cusp of the paradigm. It's a level playing field for everyone to try to get a little honest about what it means to be making work today."

[body_image width='1000' height='667' path='images/content-images/2014/11/11/' crop='images/content-images-crops/2014/11/11/' filename='how-the-bruce-high-quality-foundation-university-used-nachos-to-fund-its-fifth-year-body-image-1415749347.jpg' id='3081']

Looking forward, BHQFU has plans for a university gallery, which will begin running public exhibitions based off of the curriculum of the school in the new year.

BHQFU is located at 34 Avenue A in the East Village. You can learn more about its mission here​, and about this semester's curriculum he​re

Working a Minimum Wage Job Should Be the UK's New National Service

$
0
0

[body_image width='1200' height='729' path='images/content-images/2014/11/12/' crop='images/content-images-crops/2014/11/12/' filename='national-service-minimum-wage-jobs-272-body-image-1415808465.jpg' id='3316']

Illustrations by ​Dan Evans

This post originally appeared in VICE UK​

I was at work a little over a week ago when a greasy-haired man walked in and transferred a substantial amount of his stomach contents onto and across the bar I was standing behind.

As I watched this river of vomit pour down into the ice tray and over the stacks of glasses I'd just finished shining, I thought a lot about everything that's wrong with Ed Miliband. Despite all the schooling and qualifications that led him to the top of the Labour party, he's never had to deal with this shit. He's never had to carry a platter of frothy sick out into the street and surreptitiously pour it down a drain while a group of his peers look on in disgust.

Like most of the country's political elite, Miliband hasn't ever really worked—and that's a huge problem. It's also probably why—as ​revealed today—he's the least popular leader of any political party among their own supporters in the entire 20 years that market research company Ipsos MORI has been recording that kind of data.

In February, I was made redundant from my bare-brick-walls agency job and thrown into the reality of post-recession Britain I'd somehow managed to avoid for so long. I spent a while searching for similar work, but—as anyone with a media degree and little-to-no real working experience could have told me—that goal was doomed from the start. And so, with rent due, anything that paid anything at all was good enough.

Since then, among freelance gigs as an incompetent PR, I've kept myself fed and sheltered with minimum-wage bar work, retail jobs, cycle couriering and literally anything that could help me keep my belligerent buy-to-let landlord at arm's length. Someone also offered me £20 to eat 20 sachets of assorted condiments in the Highbury Wetherspoon's, and I wish I could tell you I had the self-respect to turn him down.

It doesn't take long in this kind of situation to come to terms with the bleak Catch-22 of capitalism—that it's much easier to live frugally when you have money to spare. You can buy food in bulk and store it in your working freezer. You can spend twice as much on clothes that last four times as long. If you're lucky, you can even save a little each month and eventually be in a position to put down a deposit on a house. When you're one pay cheque away from losing your home—as a shocking one in three ar​e right now—you become locked into an oppressive cycle of financial despair that's near-impossible to break.

[body_image width='1200' height='729' path='images/content-images/2014/11/12/' crop='images/content-images-crops/2014/11/12/' filename='national-service-minimum-wage-jobs-272-body-image-1415808519.jpg' id='3317']

At the end of that night at the bar, our spirits worn by stomach bile, we sat around talking. One colleague, Rory, suggested a twist on national service: Rather than sending school leavers off to kill, every able person must spend a year working in some kind of retail or service industry, earning minimum wage for those 12 months.

We agreed on the reasoning: You gain a sense of empathy doing this work, you learn the correct way to treat people, you don't yell at people for fucking up your order, you don't become one of those constantly exasperated dickheads who complains about the price of a burger to the kid who clearly had no say in the matter. You become more polite, forgiving, grateful, understanding. 

Yes, it's a little totalitarian in principle—and would presumably come up against a certain level of opposition—but as a concept it's fairly flawless. Imagine it—all those who'd otherwise skate by on their parents' money until falling into financial security having to discover what the world is really like, and perhaps even learning some common decency when it comes to dealing with the dreaded underclasses.

It's one thing to empathize with the people you see in the society pages of whatever paper you read, but it goes without saying that you can never truly understand an existence—be it the life of a someone earning less than the UK living wage, or the CFO of an international media conglomerate—until you've lived it yourself. That right there is Westminster's problem; never in postwar Britain have politicians been more clueless about those they represent. You only need to look at Boris Johnson's definition of "affordable" housing—where the rent on a one-bed flat is more than a full-time minimum wage job pays—to see how blind to reality our leaders are.

"IF MILIBAND DOES WIN AT NEXT YEAR'S GENERAL ELECTION, IT'LL BE LABOUR'S HOLLOWEST VICTORY IN GENERATIONS"

What endeared me most to my current MP David Lammy was reading about his first job at ​KFC and how it prepared him for the world of politics. It reminded me that Labour does have a history of folk from working backgrounds (funny that, what with their name and everything), and in the likes of Lammy and Alan Johnson—the former Tesco shelf stacker and postman—I see a party fit to call itself an alternative to the Tories.

While they might be a party for the culturally regressive and financially fortunate, at least the Conservatives have never really attempted to disguise their position as such. Labour, on the other hand, have traditionally claimed to represent the working man, so their social ignorance is that little bit more insulting.

After five years of brutal austerity and betrayal at the hands of the Tory/Lib Dem coalition—in which the NHS has been totally gutted, university fees have been raised to an unsustainable level and thousands of working families have been forced to resort to food banks to survive—Labour, in theory, should be a shoo-in. But underlying Miliband's lack of coherent policy is a total absence of any recognisable human traits. If he does win in next year's general election, it'll be as the lesser of four evils; the party's hollowest victory in generations.

Ed Miliband is that most creepy of beings: a career politician. It sounds like an unfair thing to protest, but—as Wikipedia helpfully informs me—politics means "of, for, or relating to citizens." Miliband—like David Cameron—went straight from university into this world, his entire life as detached from that of a regular citizen as it's possible to get. He doesn't know what being a normal human feels like, and it's this that makes him such an unappealing prospect.

I firmly believe that doing low paid service work for part of your life makes you a better person. I got my first weekend job when I was 14, selling fruit and veg on a market stall in my hometown. It's a cliché, but it really did teach me more about the world than anything else I've done to date. While the vast majority of my regular customers were brilliant, it doesn't take long in any retail job to realize that no matter your personality or individual merits, there are people who will always treat you like shit because of their perceived superiority—because they've never had to do this work themselves. I'm not saying Ed Miliband would treat fast food workers like pieces of human detritus, but he has the same level of ignorance to that kind of life as those who do—and that's not a man you want leading the workers.

Here's the thing about jobs: jobs are shit. Not all of them and not all of the time, but most jobs are inherently, and objectively, completely fucking terrible. If the people running this country were forced to understand this—the fact that most people's lives are arduous enough without disastrous policies making everything even worse—perhaps they'd have a population happy to vote them into power.

Follow Jack Urwin on ​Twitter

Why Does a Campus Police Department Have Jurisdiction Over 65,000 Chicago Residents?

$
0
0

[body_image width='640' height='472' path='images/content-images/2014/11/12/' crop='images/content-images-crops/2014/11/12/' filename='why-does-a-campus-police-department-have-jurisdiction-over-65000-chicago-residents-1112-body-image-1415804453.jpg' id='3238']

The University of Chicago Police Department is one of the largest private security forces in the country. Photo via Flickr user ​Jamie Manley

Last month, an alderman, a former police chief, community members, and students gathered at the Experimental Station in Hyde Park to push for changes to the University of Chicago Police Department, which has come under fire lately for its culture of secrecy and alleged racial profiling of neighborhood residents. During the meeting, Jamel Triggs, who works at Blackstone Bicycle Works, t​ol​d the crowd, "I've been held up, handcuffed and put on the curb for no reason, just because I was there."

Also present were members of the Campaign for Equitable Policing (CEP), which was founded in 2012 and helped organize a series of events last month as part of "UChicago Week Against Police Oppression."

"I was hearing a lot of stuff about that from people of color on campus who felt pressure to dress like a student and were very anxious about having their ID on them at all times," says Ava Benezra, founder of CEP and a fourth-year student at the college.

The campaign emerged from the students' realization that they had no recourse to obtain information about stops made by the UCPD. Since it is a private police force, the department is not required to release those statistics, nor is it subject to the Freedom of Information Act (FOIA). The UCPD, one of the largest private security forces in America, has the legal status of a private police force and the powers of a public one.

Yet the majority of UofC students are not all that concerned with the daily goings-on of their private army. Tovia Siegel, a fourth-year student at the university and a member of CEP, told me, "In terms of the student response on campus, there have been times when we've been outside canvassing on the quad and they've said 'UCPD helps me' and 'I love UCPD.'" She explained that the UCPD has a good relationship with the students, almost never arresting them for underage drinking or smoking and often escorting inebriated kids back to their dorms.

The UCPD keeps an extensive log of daily incident rep​orts, and are very upfront about their crime-fighting abilities. By the Department's own estima​te, there was a 31 percent drop in violent crime in the Hyde Park-South Kenwood neighborhoods in the last five years. But the UCPD is far less clear about the number of stops its officers make and whether or not they are racially profiling. According to Census data, the population of Hyde Park, at 46 percent white and 30 percent black, is highly integrated for a Chicago neighborhood—though it should be noted that black people made up 37 percent of the population a decade ago.

This past summer, CEP representatives met members of the university administration for several hours to voice their concerns. During that meeting, according to Benezra, campus officials told her they didn't want to incite the anger of the broader Hyde Park community by releasing stop-and-frisk statistics. "In response to our asks, [the administration would say,] 'We understand why you think this is important but the truth of it is if we released these statistics the community would be outraged because these numbers show we treat students differently from the community,'" she told me.

Benezra and another member of CEP also claim that during the same meeting a campus administrator compared releasing UCPD stop-and-frisk statistics to releasing students' grades.

In a statement to VICE, the UCPD said that it "does not deploy tactics that support racial profiling... As a department, we often and openly discuss our policing strategies to ensure our officers are not engaging deliberately or inadvertently in bias-based policing."

The university has an Independent Review Committee—consisting of community members, students, faculty, and staff—that releases annual reports on their reviews of the UCPD, but it has no power to make changes. According to the IRC's most recent ​report, there have been 130 complaint cases against the UCPD since 2005. Of the 99 cases that weren't handled internally and went through the IRC, 77 of the complainants were black. The IRC has been adept at acknowledging a variety of kinds of complaints, including those that the UCPD dismissed as "unfounded" without conducting an investigation.

The UCPD jurisdiction extends fro​m 37th Street on the north to 64th Street on the south and Cottage Grove Avenue to Lake Michigan—around six square miles, all told. Within these bounds, 90 full-time and ten part-time officers (the university ​says "approximately 100") ​patrol the 65,000 residents, 50,000 of whom are not students. The UCPD has primary jurisdiction over the area and full policing powers, meaning they can search, ticket, arrest, and detain. (Of course, for more serious offenses, the Chicago Police Department remains the primary investigative agency in the jurisdiction.)

Roderick Sawyer, who's been a Hyde Park resident for the past 23 years, has been involved in local governance for a while, serving on the Hyde Park Chamber of Commerce and the 53rd Street TIF Council. But he says he didn't pay much attention to the UCPD until his daughter enrolled at the University of Chicago's Collegiate Scholars program a few years ago. In a meeting between heads of University of Chicago departments and parents that took place in the summer of 2013, Sawyer mentioned that he had noticed an increase in university police making traffic stops. He asked a UCPD sergeant who was present at the meeting whether their authority extended beyond that, to which she replied that it did not.

"In 2014, that's when people began to approach me regarding... African American males being stopped on the streets, being cuffed," Sawyer told me. He claims to have started keeping an eye on the issue after witnessing undercover UCPD officers talking to some students of Kenwood Academy High School, which falls within their jurisdiction, back in May.

Since Illinois adopted the Private College Campus Pol​ice Act in 19​92, the UCPD has enjoyed the powers of a municipal or county sheriff. Importantly, the purpose of the ordinance is not only to protect the "students, employees, visitors and their property," but also the "interests of the college or university, in the county where the college or university is located." The history is murky, but the UCPD's jurisdiction has expanded on at least two occasions as a result of this loosely worded ordinance. The university was able to expand the jurisdiction of its security force in 2005, in order for it to reach the first of its neighborhood charter schools. Jeremy Manier, a university spokesman, told me over email that there was also a smaller expansion in 2011, which was designed to further protect the areas around the charter schools and was part of a ​Memorandum of Understanding between the University and the City of Chicago. 

"There's probably a number of other things that happened," Sawyer says. "The city's dealing with a budget shortfall and there's always an issue, especially on the South Side, about enough police because the city is running into budgetary problems."

Sawyer also pointed out that the expansion of private police powers is not unique to the University of Chicago: "Private colleges and universities, their departments, across the state, have the same power. It's just that the University of Chicago has been much more aggressive and creative in using that law."

Nor are issues of transparency in campus police forces unique to Illinois. Harvard, for example, has refus​ed to release its private police force's crime logs, and the city of Cambridge is now requestin​g around $3,500 to fulfill a FOIA request to disclose email correspondences between university police and the Cambridge Police Department.

Over the course of the past decade, as Sawyer's experience suggests, it seems that there's been a shift in UCPD tactics as well, including increased reliance on traffic and foot stops.

This may have started in 2007, when a Senegalese graduate student at the University of Chicago named Amadou Cisse was shot to death just off campus. In response to this tragedy, the university wasted little time in consulting the Bratton Group (them helmed by William Bratton, the former LAPD commissioner who reassumed his old gig as the head of the NYPD in January) to help it devise a report on campus security.

Bratton is one of the chief proponents of Broken Windows ​policing, in which minor infractions are punished with greater severity and frequency to discourage violent crime. Hallmarks of this policing style include more officers, more stops, and criminalization of nonviolent activities such as loitering, vandalism, smoking pot, and ​dancing "reck​l​essly." This style of policing has been criticized for leaning on racial profiling.

The Bratton Group's findings were never released to the public, but it did inform a 2008 re​port issued by the university's Campus Safety and Security Committee. Recommendations included increased visibility of security officers on campus, email alerts about criminal activity in Hyde Park, the expansion of student transportation services, expanded use of security cameras, and safety education for students.

These tactics seem to have decreased rates of violent crime, but also increased student and community tension. During a march held by students and community members to protest the closing of the university hospital's trauma center, it was discovered that a UCPD detective was participating and posing​ as a protester. Two UCPD employees were placed on administrative leave as a result of the incident.

Today, when students first arrive on campus, they are bombarded with the message that the university has one of the largest private security forces in the world outside of the Vatican. This is obviously supposed to make the first-years feel protected, but some students have reported being harassed by the UCPD. In 2010, Mauriece Dawson, a black fourth-year student, was arrested by University police in the Regenstein Library for "unruly behavior" after he refused to show the officers his ID. Several witnesses told the Chicago Mar​oon, the university's student paper, that ​Dawson and his friends "were not unusually loud for the popular study area." 

But the complaint heard most often is that the UCPD is racially profiling young black and brown men in Hyde Park. Aerik Francis, who is black and Latino and graduated from the college in June, told me, "There are a lot of local residents who were between maybe ten and 18, and they would tell me that they grew up knowing that UChicago was a place that we couldn't go. Oftentimes police officers would come up to them and ask them what they were doing and throw them against the wall."

Francis told me that on his very first day at college, during orientation, his dad, who is black, was denied access to a campus building when he failed to produce ID for a UCPD officer while trying to find a bathroom.

"After that point, I've never been stopped, but walking around Hyde Park, I've had cop cars slow and watch me," Francis said. "I was always really persistent about making sure I presented myself as a student, wearing UChicago gear, my hoodie and stuff." Students of color frequently told Francis stories of being stopped by UCPD and asked for their ID. "It's a lot of harassment and profiling," says Francis. For him, Hyde Park "kind of has the vibe of a police state." 

Hannah K. Gold, a graduate of the University of Chicago, is a Brooklyn-based journalist writing about criminal justice, higher ed, and pop culture. She's written for the Nation, Al Jazeera America, The Youngist, and Rolling Stone. Follow her on ​Twitter.

The Kids Who Live and Work in Indonesian Graveyards

$
0
0

[body_image width='640' height='513' path='images/content-images/2014/11/13/' crop='images/content-images-crops/2014/11/13/' filename='these-kids-live-in-an-indonesian-graveyard-body-image-1415850345.jpg' id='3546']​

Photos by Lody Andrian

Over the last few years, wealthy Indonesians have started to decorate their graves in a lavish style that resembles Southern California's mid-century trend of "memorial parks," only more extreme. In Jakarta, San Diego Hills M​emorial Park, which opened in 2007, resembles a theme park for the wealthy and dead—it boasts a restaurant, swimming pool, campground, and paddle boats you can take out on "Lake Los Angeles." 

Another Jakarta burial ground,  Pondok Kelapa Public Cemetery, was in the local news recently because a body was dumped there after a gruesome murder, for which the killer was sentenced last month. The place is watched over by a band of kids as young as two who work and even and live there. The flip side of rich Indonesians tricking out their cemeteries is poor Indonesians ​living in them—which is perhaps understandable when you consider how economic growth in the country has given rise to ​skyrocketing income inequality.

One of the tiny caretakers at Pondok Kelapa is Riski, who doesn't know his age but looks about seven. He spends his days burying the dead and keeping the graves clean.

When my photographer and I found him he was with a friend named Putra, playing with a bag of lizards. Riski was wearing a pair of faux Crocs and a T-shirt that said "Slank Mo Drugs." When we asked the workers in the funeral shops in the area about him, they said he and his friend were the youngest cemetery caretakers they knew of and that Riski was the son of a plastic scavenger who had dumped them amidst the tombstones. 

When I asked him what he was up to, he said he was hunting geckos.  In the West, this would be like playing with a black cat. Geckos are unpopular in Indonesia because of some residual Hindu animism that still pervades the local folk wisdom. People here think geckos are evil spirits or bad luck, so it was almost Addams Family–esque these two kids wanted to play with them here in a graveyard, a paradise for superstitions. 

[body_image width='2000' height='1453' path='images/content-images/2014/11/12/' crop='images/content-images-crops/2014/11/12/' filename='these-kids-live-in-an-indonesian-graveyard-body-image-1415755923.jpg' id='3085']

"You live around here?" I asked.

"Yes, we live together," Riski replied, pointing to a shelter made of propped-up tin roofing.

I asked Riski about his parents, and instead of answering me he suddenly walked to his house, as if he wanted to take us on a tour. Inside was an elderly homeless woman they called "grandma" who apparently lived in the cemetery and looked after the orphans who lived there. She took care of the domestic duties while the kids looked after the graves.

She had, however, filled their heads with junk about school being a waste of money and told them to work here instead. By watching the old graves, plus digging and cleaning, Riski told me he could make about 1,000 rupiah (eight cents), and sometimes up to 5,000 (40 cents). The standard burial costs 20,000 ($1.64), but sometimes there are people who don't pay. I asked what happens when grievers stiff them. "We don't eat," he replied, but his attitude was relentlessly positive. "This has become a hobby," Riski said. "I just feel happy that when people are sad, I actually work. Putting people in the ground is nice. Especially when I do a good job."

[body_image width='2000' height='1205' path='images/content-images/2014/11/12/' crop='images/content-images-crops/2014/11/12/' filename='these-kids-live-in-an-indonesian-graveyard-body-image-1415755957.jpg' id='3086']

Riski runs the Islamic general cemetery area, meaning there are no coffins. It also means, according to custom, that mourners will perform the burial themselves, with the help of the cemetery caretakers. The corpses are bathed, wrapped in a white shroud, and then tied with a rope at the ankles, wrists, and head. The rope must be untied from around the head after the dead body is in the ground—if it isn't, the spirit of the departed is said to turn into a ghost called a  ​Pocong.

I asked Riski what the point of guarding a cemetery is. He told me there are "pranksters" who take skulls, soil, and headstones "for talismans and witchery,"referring to superstitious merchants and entrepreneurs who believe that stuff from cemeteries can bring them success in business

Riski told me he once saw a  Kuntilanak, the ghost of a pregnant woman who died before giving birth. Legend has if you're haunted by a Kuntilanak, she'll cry for her baby until her tears turn into blood. His description fit the legend: "A woman with long hair, and a long white dress, with blood under her eyes." He said he'd seen her by a big tree not far from his shelter. I could see the tree he meant. I asked him when he'd seen her, and he said, "She's there right now," maybe trying extra hard to freak us out. 

[body_image width='2000' height='1328' path='images/content-images/2014/11/12/' crop='images/content-images-crops/2014/11/12/' filename='these-kids-live-in-an-indonesian-graveyard-body-image-1415756119.jpg' id='3087']

Soon after, "Grandma" shooed the children away, saying there was work to be done. She introduced me to the third of her "grandsons," Alfian, who is two years old. asked her about whether she felt like she was exploiting them. "They're here of their own will," she said. "They say they do it for food, which I cook for them." I asked her if she kept their money, and she was upfront about the fact that she did. "They're still very young. They'll waste it on candy. I just want to help them."

Indonesia has a brand new Minister of Education with his work cut out for him. In addition to the income inequality that makes schooling for kids like Riski unfeasible, there's also the fact that ​one in three Indonesian schools is in some kind of conflict zone. Despite having the largest economy in Southeast Asia, the country's schools are the ​second worst in the regions. In short, despite the presence of new money in Indonesia that's making all those fancy mausoleums feasible, the future looks dismal for Riski's generation.

When I expressed some pessimism about her plight, Grandma said, "All I can do is pray." 

Follow Dennis Destryawan on ​Twitter.

Mike Pearl contributed to this story.

That Comet We Just Landed On Smells Like Ass

$
0
0

[body_image width='880' height='1200' path='images/content-images/2014/11/12/' crop='images/content-images-crops/2014/11/12/' filename='smell-a-comet-708-body-image-1415823470.jpg' id='3478']

Earlier today we landed a fucking spacecraft on a comet. The internet is freaking out about it, sharing dark, blurry images from outer-space at roughly the speed of light. What you can't tell from the photos, however, is that the comet, known as 67P/Churyumov-Gerasimenko, smells worse than the inside of an asshole. Using data collected from the Rosetta Orbiter Sensor for Ion and Neutral Analysis (ROSINA), a recent University of Bern study showed that comets smell like a combination of rotten eggs (hydrogen sulphide), horse stable (ammonia), along with alcohol, formaldehyde, almond, and vinegar.

It's remarkable, when you think about it, that those disgustingly familiar smells emanate from comets. Their cousins, meteors, are local—hanging around Mars and Jupiter—while comets could schlep these odors in from as far away as the ​Oort cloud, the outer limit of our solar system, which makes sense, since "Oort cloud" kind of sounds like a name for a fart.

To better understand what's going on up there, I decided to mix up a batch of comet funk and smell it. I reached out to Kathrin Altwegg, the principal investigator for ROSINA, to see if I'd be putting my life at risk in this noble pursuit of scientific truth. "I think it's fun to mix this, and we are actually doing something similar for the event we will have in our institute," she told me. With the blessing of a bona fide scientist in my pocket, I set to work collecting the ingredients I'd need as though I were taking part in the most idiotic RPG quest ever (although I skipped the formaldehyde since it was the one carcinogenic part of the formula).

First, I'd need to find some rotten eggs. A sign of smooth sailing ahead, a friend immediately responded to my online call for help saying she'd just left a dozen eggs out for a few days while she was out of town. I scooped those up first so as to let them age a bit more while I gathered everything else.

Some of the basic ingredients like almond extract and vinegar were easy to pick up. But I needed that horse stable smell to fully capture the stench the ROSINA crew had promised me. The closest thing to a horse stable I could find was the pony ride attraction in LA's Griffith Park. I sidled up to one of the employees manning the line of little kids waiting for rides and made my proposition: "Hey, man. This might sound weird, but is there any way I could scoop up some hay or dirt with pony pee on it?"

The guy was completely unfazed. He asked his superior if I could get in the cage to grab a sample, and the boss told me, "Sure, buddy. We get requests for this stuff all the time. You're not the first to ask." I made a mental note to look into that later, and scooped up some trampled turds that I'd just seen one of the ponies piss all over. 

Moving to a new area of the park (because fuck doing this in my apartment), I lined a waste bin with a garbage bag and started mixing the potion with a stick. The horse piss didn't have quite the ammonia punch I was hoping for, so in the interest of data-gathering, I added a big splash of regular cleaning ammonia to the mix.

Eggs were dropped in whole and broken with the stick. The other liquids were added. Finally, a bottle of water was poured in to help mix everything together. Ms. Altwegg herself had nudged me in the direction of H2O, pointing out that comets were mostly ice, after all.

I leaned in for my first whiff.  The odor was funky and a bit acrid, but never tipped the scale into downright wretch-inducing territory. There was an antiseptic tinge to the whole thing from the ammonia. Like the weird dirty-clean smell of a hospital but with the dial turned way up. It had a certain beer smell, though not a brewery as much as the bottom of your shoes after a night shuffling around a college bar. All in all, it smelled like science took a shit, but to me, not a nightmarishly stinky one. I'd need other opinions.

I ran to my car, grabbed a piece of paper and a Sharpie, and scrolled on it: "SMELL A COMET!!!" I taped the sign to my can in the hopes of luring in some adventurous park-goers. 

It worked. A couple girls stopped and I explained what was going on. "I'll tell you what's in it after you smell," I promised. "It's not anything that's going to cause you harm, but you probably won't like it." 

Surprisingly, the girls stuck their heads over the can and inhaled.

[body_image width='2000' height='1500' path='images/content-images/2014/11/11/' crop='images/content-images-crops/2014/11/11/' filename='smell-a-comet-708-body-image-1415729719.jpg' id='3009']

"I don't smell anything," the first said.

"You have to get deep in there."

She pushed her face farther into the can.

"Ugh. What is that? I'm going to vomit."

"It's a comet!"

The second took her sniff and I went through the grocery list with them and thanked them for their intrepid spirits. They went on their way and I flagged down a jogger who had started his walking break.

[body_image width='2000' height='1425' path='images/content-images/2014/11/11/' crop='images/content-images-crops/2014/11/11/' filename='smell-a-comet-708-body-image-1415730260.jpg' id='3013']

"Would you be interested in smelling a comet? I'm getting people's interpretations for a research project," I said, not exactly lying. We went through the same motions as with the girls, and he left a bit nonplussed, probably wishing he hadn't done the thing I asked him to do.

Another guy came by and wanted to know if he could pick up the bucket to get closer, see what the turds of space really smell like. By all means, friend. Get in there. He pulled his head out and made a scrunched up face and had a little dry heave.

"Uhh. Yeah. OK. Yeah. That was pretty unpleasant. Thank you."

Strangers were now thanking me for coercing them into smelling horse piss. I didn't even have a camera crew or anything remotely official-looking to lend me any credibility. All I had was bucket of dirt, horse pee, and rotten eggs with a hand-written sign taped onto it. You're incredibly trusting, Angelenos.

After an older man and a middle-aged woman had their turn with the comet bucket, I decided to pack it in. Maybe I wasn't going to change anyone's life for the better with my research—in fact, for a while there I was actively trying to make some people's days a teensy bit worse—but Professor Altwegg thought I was all right, and that was enough for me. I threw out the garbage bag of swill and left to go see Interstellar.

Follow Justin Caffier on ​Twitter.

Crooked Men: Crimine-Infinito: The Complex Structure of the Calabrian Mob

$
0
0

Antonio Pelle of the 'Ndrangheta crime family reportedly reached the rank of vangelo (gospel), a high-level official who is sworn in with his hand on the Bible. Illustration by Jacob Everett

In criminal organizations hierarchy is everything. A few years ago, the Italian government led an investigation called Crimine-Infinito that revealed the complex structure of the 'Ndrangheta, the Calabrian mob. Long considered a "horizontal Mafia," or a simple confederation of clans, the 'Ndrangheta was shown to have a secret hierarchical structure with a central leader, exactly like the better-known Cosa Nostra.

The governing body of the 'Ndrangheta is the Crimine (Crime), supervised by the capo crimine (head crime). His spokesperson, the mastro di giornata (master of the day), passes along his orders. Underneath them are the colonels: the mastro generale (general master), the capo società (head of the society), and the contabile (accountant).

At the base of the 'Ndrangheta are the 'ndrine, clans made up of members of the same family (often enlarged through arranged marriages). Each 'ndrina is in charge of a distinct territory called a locale (local), which does not always coincide with a geographic zone: It is possible to have numerous locals in the same city, or multiple cities in the same local. The Crimine controls every local in the world, and everyone there must obey its every command.

Each local has at least 49 members and answers to a capo locale (head local), also called a capo bastone (head crook) after the staff used by shepherds to round up sheep. He directs the criminal activity in his territory, calls meetings, decides on memberships and promotions, and resolves conflicts. Just like the capo crimine in the central organization of the 'Ndrangheta, every capo locale is flanked by a capo società, his chief manager; a mastro di giornata, who delivers his instructions to the underlings (in slang, "he passes the news"); and a contabile, who oversees the funds coming from illicit activities, the so-called valigetta (briefcase).

The locals have a double structure: the Società Minore (Minor Society), comprising the lowest-level members, and the Società Maggiore (Major Society), also called the Società Santa (Holy Society), composed of their superiors. There are many ranks (known as doti) in the 'Ndrangheta, and a member's position determines his tasks, responsibilities, and salary.

In the Società Minore, the lowest tier is occupied by the giovane d'onore (youth of honor), a descendant of a boss and an honorary member by blood right. Above him is the picciotto d'onore (boy of honor), the first role given to those who join the 'Ndrangheta. He'll carry out menial tasks, mostly manual labor, until he graduates to the position of camorrista (literally "someone who collects extortion money") and takes on more complicated jobs. The top brass in the Società Minore is known as the sgarrista (soldier).

One enters the upper house of the local, the Società Maggiore, as a santista (the name refers to his being part of the Società Santa). A rung above him is the vangelo (gospel), so called because he swore loyalty to the 'Ndrangheta with one hand on the Bible (a tattooed cross marks his left shoulder). Next is the trequartino (three quarters), who has privileged access to three quarters of the organization (he has a cross on his right shoulder and an emerald rose under his foot). The ranks continue ever upward: quartino (one quarter), padrino (godfather), crociata (crusade), stella (star), bartolo (the origins of this title are unknown), Mammasantissima (Most Holy Mother), and infinito (infinity). The Società Maggiore culminates in the figure of the Conte Agadino. The name is probably a reference to Count Ugolino, whom Dante depicts as eating his own children in the Inferno. The boss of the 'Ndrangheta may eat his children, sell them, sacrifice them without facing a vendetta. Arriving at the top of the 'Ndrangheta means acquiring the power to kill and betray one's own blood.

***

Up to a certain point in the 'Ndrangheta's hierarchy, each rank has a religious reference and is identified with a saint. (The picciotto is associated with St. Liberata, the camorrista with St. Nunzia, and the sgarrista with St. Elizabeth.)

It's important to keep in mind that the 'Ndrangheta's initiation ritual is known as a "baptism." The members position themselves in the shape of a horseshoe and receive the baptismal candidate from a "guarantor," a kind of godparent who vouches for the prospective member and the authenticity of his intentions to enter into the clan. A capo società officiates the rite, asking the initiate questions and reading him the honor codes that he will be required to maintain at the cost of his life. The Mafia baptism is a "blood baptism": The new member's finger is cut by a sharp knife so that a drop of his blood falls on the prayer-card image of St. Michael the Archangel-considered the patron saint of the 'Ndrangheta-which is then slightly burned on one corner. At the end of this ceremony, a new "man of honor" is created. (Every promotion to a higher rank requires its own ritual.)

It seems unbelievable, but even today, as I am writing this, young people are joining criminal organizations through archaic rituals. And not only in Italy but all over the world.

On the night of August 15, 2007, in the quiet town of Duisburg, Germany, the final act of a 16-year-old feud took place. The Nirta-Strangio and the Pelle-Vottari-the two most powerful clans in San Luca, the Calabrian village that is the stronghold of the 'Ndrangheta-had been warring since 1991. Everything had started with an ordinary Carnival prank: During the festivities, some guys from the Nirta-Strangio threw eggs and flour in front of a bar run by the Pelles, dirtying the car of a member of the Vottari family. This was immediately interpreted as an affront, since everyone knew that the Strangios were trying to expand their power over the area. So began a feud that caused more than a dozen deaths over the next decade and a half. The last set of murders happened on that night in Duisberg, when the Nirta-Strangio sought to avenge a death that had occurred a few months earlier. They killed six people linked to the Pelle-Vottari families, almost all of them very young, in front of an Italian restaurant called Da Bruno, where one of the victims had just celebrated his 18th birthday. A burned prayer card with St. Michael's image that was found in the pocket of the guest of honor led investigators to deduce that the restaurant had probably been the site of a rite of initiation of the 'Ndrangheta. Inside, there was a statue of St. Michael, and in a windowless room in the back numerous images of the Madonna di Polsi (Our Lady of Polsi, revered by members of the 'Ndrangheta) hung on the wall, watching over a long table with 12 chairs. The motivation for the murders and the ceremony that took place in Duisburg had originated more than 1,200 miles away, in the small town of San Luca. Rules, codes, and rituals travel from San Luca to Germany, to the rest of Europe, and to the United States-any place in the world where the 'Ndrangheta have extended their tentacles.

***

Being in a criminal organization means being a member of a structure that is part business, part religious order, and part ancient military (like the Roman army, which was organized in legions). Legends and codes abound in Mafias, which use them to construct a collective identity for their members. Rituals are useful because they provide rules in a world without rules: Italian crime families are considered the most trustworthy underground organizations in the world because they have regulations, which aren't the rules of jurisprudence-the law-but of behavior and discipline for illegal operations (which, by definition, have no rules).

It may seem paradoxical that a country known for its absolute lack of rules has the mob with the most rules in the world. Italian mafiosi are conservative, traditional-quite different from their modernized, emancipated Italian-American counterparts. Joe Pistone ("Donnie Brasco"), the FBI agent who infiltrated the New York Mafia, maintains that the more mafiosi become Americanized the more they become mere bullies, failing to understand that you don't commit a crime just to get rich, because if you break the Mafia's rules you also break its way of life.

In the 1970s Vincenzo Macrì, nephew and designated heir of Antonio Macrì, boss of the 'ndrina of Siderno (in Calabria), was "laid down"-that is, banned from the organization-because his behavior did not conform to that of a good 'Ndranghetista (member of the 'Ndrangheta). Vincenzo rode around on a Vespa, went out in a T-shirt and shorts, and was ultimately replaced. Even today a 'Ndranghetista must rigorously respect certain parameters: He must not be a playboy, and he must be careful not to cause trouble, avoiding fights and stupid stunts. In other words, he must not attract unnecessary attention.

I've always been struck by the spirit of absolute sacrifice exhibited by the bosses of criminal organizations. I've often wondered how a man can withstand the conditions of a maximum-security prison (where Italian law requires Mafia bosses to be held) for decades. You understand it when you see how bosses live as free men or, even worse, as fugitives: forced to stay closed up in tiny, windowless bunkers to avoid being discovered by law enforcement.

Italy has more bunkers than any other country in the world. There are places, such as the area around the town of Locri, in Calabria, where they are part of everyone's daily life. A household builds a bunker almost automatically, preparing for the worst: Hopefully it won't be necessary, but it's better to have it just in case. Bunkers are part of the blueprints of new homes. It's as though good parents think about their sons' futures by providing them with a safe place to spend their time as fugitives. Plus a relative, a brother-in-law, a cousin, or an uncle might need it. The mafioso knows that sooner or later his life on the outside will only be possible if he knows how to hide.

The bunker, however, is a mind-set more than a hideout-the mind-set of living with very little space, of never going out, of never seeing sunlight. It's like an animal den. It's a crawl space only made human by a scant collection of personal items: prayer cards, porn magazines, car and watch catalogues-things that prove the power of the mafioso is internal rather than external. The boss has to satisfy himself with the pictures of those watches and luxury cars, buying them with his eyes, because he will never be able to leave his spider hole.

This is the price someone pays when he wants real power, the power over life and death.

Translated from the Italian by Kim Ziegler

VICE After Dark with John Lurie - Episode 1

$
0
0
[youtube src='//www.youtube.com/embed/NGDW_lRCA7E' width='560' height='315']

It's the premiere episode of VICE After Dark with John Lurie, a live internet radio show hosted by cult icon John Lurie. You know John. He's the guy from Fishing with John, all those Jim Jarmusch movies, the band the Lounge Lizards, and the creator of the fictional musician Marvin Pontiac. John's priority for the last 12 years has been his paintings.

We gave him a nighttime talk show to chat about whatever he wants, because why not. Seemed like a good idea to us. Call in and talk to John at (347) 474-0415.

Make sure to tune in next Wednesday, November 19, at 9 PM EST for the second episode.

Follow John on ​Twitter.

​Subscribe to ​VICE YouTube.


As America Doubles Down on Climate Targets, Canada Stays Quiet

$
0
0

[body_image width='894' height='504' path='images/content-images/2014/11/13/' crop='images/content-images-crops/2014/11/13/' filename='as-america-doubles-down-on-climate-targets-canada-stays-quiet-932-body-image-1415892943.jpg' id='3651']​
Photo of Barack Obama and Stephen Harper, via WikiMedia Commons.

Can you hear the awkward silence? That's the sound of Environment Canada not releasing its annual report on national carbon emission trends, amid news that America and China have both made ambitious commitments to curb climate change.

Late last night, US President Barack Obama and Chinese President Xi Jinping announced a surprise agreement to reduce carbon pollution over the next few decades. America is aiming to get emissions 26 to 28 percent below 2005 levels by the year 2025. China intends to "peak" its carbon emissions before 2030, and acquire 20 percent of its total energy from zero-emission sources by the same deadline.

As the two biggest polluters in the world (producing 18 and 24 percent of global greenhouse gas emissions, respectively) the US-China deal has been branded a game-changer. America's pledge goes well beyond the 17 percent reduction by 2020 set by both Canada and the US, nearly doubling the pace of the country's pollution cutbacks.

Meanwhile, Canada has been pretty much ignoring its carbon targets, perhaps hoping nobody will notice. Our Prime Minister didn't attend the UN's climate summit in September, despite being in New York City at the time. Just last week, the president of France called us out for ignoring climate until the last possible minute:

"We would like to avoid what happened in Denmark, in Copenhagen, where the heads of state and governments thought they could reach an agreement in the very few, last few hours. This is not possible," said French President Francois Hollande in Canada's parliament last week, well ahead of final climate negotiations scheduled for Paris in 2015. "We have to find an agreement within the coming months."

On October 25 last year, Environment Canada released a report showing Canada is expected to miss its climate target of 17 percent less emissions, by a margin of 122 megatonnes in 2020. This year, October 25 came and went without a peep about climate from our environmental regulator, despite growing international concerns about how to regulate our massively-expanding oil sands industry. According to media relations officer Christine Roger, Environment Canada's carbon trend report "is currently being prepared and will be released in due course."

"There have been some gains in Canada—the coal phase-out in Ontario, the carbon tax in BC—some smaller provinces have made gains too, but all of that has been wiped out by growth in emissions in our oil sands sector," says Chris Severson-Baker, managing director of the Calgary-based Pembina Institute, an environmental group that works with big business. That same trend report from last year showed oil sands emissions are currently set to double from 55 megatonnes in 2011 to 101 megatonnes in 2020.

The federal government of Canada doesn't currently regulate oil sands emissions whatsoever. We literally have no nation-wide rules on this stuff. The province of Alberta has some rules (to reduce the "intensity" of production by 12 percent, more on that later) but for nearly eight years the feds have been tied up in closed-door consultations with industry, setting no targets, extending deadlines on and on to infinity. "There's always been a sense that oil and gas regulations are being discussed and will be announced," says Severson-Baker. "That's been going on between five and seven years."


​[body_image width='1600' height='1067' path='images/content-images/2014/11/13/' crop='images/content-images-crops/2014/11/13/' filename='as-america-doubles-down-on-climate-targets-canada-stays-quiet-932-body-image-1415892511.jpg' id='3645']
​Photo from the People's Climate March in September, when thousands of Canadians in Vancouver protested Canada's environmental policy in solidarity with over 300,000 in New York City, ​via Flickr user doucy.

​Alberta first started regulating oil sands emissions in 2007. It's regulated on an "intensity" program, which means if you produce and sell three times more bitumen, you're allowed to emit three times more carbon, as long as it's 12 percent more efficient. As of 2012, total emissions from Alberta have exceeded 249 megatonnes. The province is supposed to renew these regulations by the end of the year, but as in previous years, Severson-Baker says that deadline is likely to get pushed.

Of course, the latest United Nations intergovernmental report on climate change clearly states this is no time for extended deadlines, given that we're on the brink of irreversible damage and all:

"Our assessment finds that the atmosphere and oceans have warmed, the amount of snow and ice has diminished, sea level has risen and the concentration of carbon dioxide has increased to a level unprecedented in at least the last 800,000 years," writes IPCC research co-chair Thomas Stocker in a November 2 statement. "We have little time before the window of opportunity to stay within 2ºC of warming closes. To keep a good chance of staying below 2ºC, and at manageable costs, our emissions should drop by 40 to 70 percent globally between 2010 and 2050, falling to zero or below by 2100."

Environmentalists are hoping this US-China agreement will disrupt Canada's ignore-and-deflect strategy. "Every time the climate issue is raised, we say we can't do anything because of competitiveness," says Severson-Baker. "With this announcement, two of the biggest economies in the world are showing they're interested in taking leadership on climate change, which removes any excuses that Canada might have for failing to take the kind of steps that are necessary."

Having locked most of our recent climate commitments into US policy, Canada may have no choice but to follow along. At the UN climate summit in New York, in front of 125 world leaders minus Harper, Environment Minister Leona Aglukkaq pledged to at least match American vehicle-emissions standards. While Canada only accounts for 2 percent of global greenhouse gas emissions, we may not get away with being one of the worst per-capita emitters for much longer.

​​@sarah​berms

Trying to Make a Short Film in 48 Hours Made Me Feel Like an Idiot

$
0
0

This post originally appeared in VICE UK

This weekend, I entered the 48 Hour Film Project, an international challenge where each entrant has 48 hours to make a short film. Once you're done, your 4 to 7-minute masterpiece is screened in a cinema, to either adoration or complete and utter contempt.

I paid £110 to enter (even though the grand international prize is a paltry £3,160), so I thought I should probably take it seriously. I soon realized that, even while being very serious, I am not a good enough director, writer, or human organizer to make a decent film in 48 hours.

I kept a diary so you too can experience my ineptitude.

[body_image width='1200' height='800' path='images/content-images/2014/11/12/' crop='images/content-images-crops/2014/11/12/' filename='48-hour-film-project-220-body-image-1415820215.jpg' id='3468']

Our leading man during a psychotherapy scene. All photos by Nick Hilton unless otherwise stated.

FRIDAY

The Phoenix Artist Club—where the launch was being held—is situated on the Charing Cross Road, right in the heart of London's West End. This means the chances of finding any actual "artists" is pretty slim. Arriving there, my assumptions were proved correct: the basement bar was filled with an assortment of bewildered tourists and the kind of stubbly white men who look like they might identify as "visual poets" in their Twitter bios.

I hadn't expected the competition's launch event to be such a jubilant social gathering. All around me, teams of entrants were chugging preparatory pints while I sweated out the blistering inner body heat that follows a trip through rush hour London with three bags of film equipment.

Each team was asked to pick a genre out of a hat and then make a film that corresponded to those vague guidelines. These genres ranged from broad (comedy, horror) to specific ("fish out of water," "animal movie") to stuff you have to Google ("Film de Femme"). I picked "dark comedy," which was suitably middle-of-the-road.

As the bar's clock ticked down to 7 PM, the crowd assumed their positions like sprinters awaiting the starting gun. There was one team leader sporting both a dense beard and an elegant man bun. Another team's leader was wearing Google Glass and focusing intently on something. Another team, "Hot Chihuahua," couldn't be found, despite the persistent efforts of the compere.

My team was waiting for me at home—Ollie, Director of Photography; Tom, VFX artist; Lucy, first AD; and Joey, our Dutch leading man. With just a few hours to script the film, we were in a real race against time to mitigate the chance of it being completely shit. We did not win that race. Turns out you need at least a couple of days to write and edit a script that anyone might conceivably enjoy.

We also had to work around one of the challenges of the competition, which is to somehow shoehorn a mandatory prop  (in this case a greeting card) and character (a "coach" of some variety) into the script. In order to do this, the plot of our film saw a young man traveling from the Netherlands to a "confidence coach" in London. There, he is given an experimental confidence drug that sees his self-esteem rise and rise until he becomes a godlike figure, looking down on mortals with the crushing disdain of a Reddit atheist.

[body_image width='1200' height='800' path='images/content-images/2014/11/12/' crop='images/content-images-crops/2014/11/12/' filename='48-hour-film-project-220-body-image-1415820233.jpg' id='3470']

This is about as excited as anyone got all weekend.

SATURDAY

If you can count on anything in the early British winter, it's daylight coming to a close just as the 3 o'clock soccer match kicks off.

With the benefit of hindsight—that mortal enemy of spontaneous creativity—maybe it would have been sensible to factor the dying light into the script, or to have set some of the film at night. But, boldly, we had scripted the entire thing to take place during the bright sunshine hours. On Saturday morning, we waited until about 10 AM, when the sun confirmed its non-appearance via the BBC Weather website, and finally decided to start shooting.

The actual shooting bit was remarkably easy. We only had two actors—our strapping Dutchman, who looked like a young, shaved Khal Drogo—and our actress, who was the 2010 Ladies World Backgammon Champion. Neither had a huge amount of experience, but, you know, neither did I.

[body_image width='1200' height='800' path='images/content-images/2014/11/12/' crop='images/content-images-crops/2014/11/12/' filename='48-hour-film-project-220-body-image-1415820256.jpg' id='3472']

Amazingly, the weather held until just after we'd finished shooting everything we needed outdoors. We wrapped about 15 minutes before the heavens opened, safe and sound inside while we started editing the film with one eye and watching the Almería - Barcelona match with the other.

David, our editor, was plugged in for about four hours while the rest of us loitered around uselessly. When he finally showed us the cut of our film, it looked fine. That might sound like a damning adjective to use, but I'm no Kubrick, and where a more fastidious director might have micro-managed the edit until the timing and shot selection were perfect, I'm actually quite happy with "fine."

[body_image width='1200' height='675' path='images/content-images/2014/11/12/' crop='images/content-images-crops/2014/11/12/' filename='48-hour-film-project-220-body-image-1415829977.jpg' id='3486']

Our VFX money-shot, on which we blew about 90 percent of our talent. Image by Tom Coster.

SUNDAY

"Every action must have an equal and opposite reaction," said a man once. If Saturday was our day of smooth sailing, Sunday was our day of realizing that you can't polish a turd without several years of formal training.

I decided to sleep in until around 11 AM, because I figured we'd only need from around noon to get the film finished. I was wrong. First, the arrival of our ambitious VFX shots was delayed by a few hours, which, in turn, delayed locking the edit and starting the color grade. Simultaneously, without a locked edit, our sound editor couldn't start work on the sound design.

So we sat and waited. We bought some pizzas. I had a "vegorama," which was like 80 percent herbs. Still we waited. We played a co-operative iPhone game called Spaceteam, which involved a lot of distracting shouting. And then, after briefly discussing Tinder, we waited some more.

[body_image width='1200' height='800' path='images/content-images/2014/11/12/' crop='images/content-images-crops/2014/11/12/' filename='48-hour-film-project-220-body-image-1415820297.jpg' id='3475']

Tom, our VFX guy, arrived at around 3:30 PM with the VFX shots, meaning we should have then been able to start on the sound design. Unfortunately, our sound editor had forgotten the charger for his laptop, which we'd spent the past couple of hours using to keep track of the Newcastle—West Brom score, running the battery into the ground. So instead of using Pro Tools for the sound design, we had to tweak it in Premiere. Again, this is fine, bar the fact the film now makes you feel like you might have tinnitus after watching it through.

The 7:30 PM deadline edged closer (the challenge is actually 48-and-a-half hours, but I guess that's a less catchy name) while the edit rendered out with agonizingly glacial slowness. On top of that, it took 25 minutes to copy the file to a USB drive, which meant we had to do that part of the process while travelling back to the Phoenix Artist Club.

[body_image width='1200' height='900' path='images/content-images/2014/11/12/' crop='images/content-images-crops/2014/11/12/' filename='48-hour-film-project-220-body-image-1415820338.jpg' id='3476']

Rendering on our way through London. Photo by Ollie Craig.

There was very little ceremony to our arrival, just a few people in the bar—presumably about to head to a showing of Once at the theater above—and Graham, the challenge's organizer, collecting forms and DVDs. I handed him our film somewhat reluctantly—frankly, the idea of it being "judged" in any manner makes me feel sick—and that was that. There was nothing more to it: no party, no streamers, no ticker-tape parade. Just a man, sitting on his own in a corner booth, vaping and smiling at me.

Forty-eight hours is not enough time to create video "art." I think I can say that quite definitively.

It's a disappointingly non-profound conclusion, but I suspect we achieved little more than creating a short film, somewhere on the average-to-poor axis, quite quickly. However, perhaps the real challenge to be found in all of this is how fast you can realize the limit of your abilities. If so, I think we're in contention. 

Follow Nick Hilton on ​Twitter

I Thought Becoming Jack Kerouac Would Cure My Depression

$
0
0

[body_image width='1024' height='681' path='images/content-images/2014/11/13/' crop='images/content-images-crops/2014/11/13/' filename='i-thought-becoming-jack-kerouac-would-cure-my-depression-284-body-image-1415878441.jpg' id='3588']

Highway 138, California (Photo by Tiberiu Ana ​via)

This post originally appeared in VICE UK

​When Ford launched the Model T—the first ever mass-produced— in 1908, traveling not only got easier for the average American, but automobiles became expressions of their individuality. No longer did people need to cram onto trains with a ton of strangers; instead, they could travel alone or with whoever they wanted sitting in the passenger seat.

When the Great Depression hit in the 1920s, Americans began traveling more out of economic need than as a means to convey their individuality to strangers. John Steinbeck depicted this in The Grapes of Wrath, a novel telling the story of Tom Joad, a farmer journeying from Dust Bowl Oklahoma to California where, apparently, everything is fruitful.

Then, when the Depression ended after World War II, a generation of middle-class youth began rebelling against society, and the concept of "teenager" was born. Having been reared on the car, they started commandeering it as an instrument of their restlessness, driving not to any place in particular, but just anywhere away from Here.

I first fell in love with the myth of the road at 19, when I read—somewhat predictably—Jack Kerouac's On the Road. A member of this rebellious generation, Kerouac drove and hitchhiked around America until essentially the day he died, cataloguing a period of it in On the Road, a book of ecstatic revelations and wild, free-flowing prose.

It was a precarious point in my life: I was jobless, had no education—having dropped out of school because of depression—and was living through a horrendous time in my country's history (Ireland, the Celtic Tiger years) where almost everyone was making money—more money than I, with my vague ambitions, ever hoped to.

§

Naturally, Kerouac's kind of travel appealed to me. It offered not just the drug and sexual experiences I feared I was missing out on by not going to uni, but also—in allowing me to "find" myself—a cure for my depression. However, in the cold light of day, the thought of me hitchhiking felt ridiculous. Because I lived in Ireland—an island you can drive the length of in five hours—I'd at least have to get to mainland Europe first, and how could I do that without any money?

Applying for a job seemed impossible. Though the answer to their question would be simple—"I dropped out of school because of mental illness"—the idea of telling this to someone terrified me. I wasn't secure in my depression. Maybe, because I lived in a house where it wasn't really spoken about, I believed—deep down—it didn't actually exist. Often I wondered whether it was more weakness, rather than depression, that had fucked me up.

So I began searching for other stuff like On the Road: books and films that could be consumed from the comfort of my bedroom, but which depicted an outside world rife with the ecstatic revelations I required for when I did get to travel.

[youtube src='//www.youtube.com/embed/inIRtrZIvwU' width='640' height='480']

The trailer for Five Easy Pieces

Something pointed me to Five Easy Pieces, a road movie starring Jack Nicholson from 1970. In it, he plays a guy who drifts around a lot and boozes, but unlike Kerouac does so more to run from his past than towards a fulfilling future. In childhood, we learn, he was a piano prodigy—a calling he now regrets giving up on, judging by his frequent fits of rage.

Forty minutes into the film, he travels from California to Washington to visit his disapproving father. He seeks forgiveness but finds his father incapable of speech and movement after a stroke. So with no forgiveness coming he hitchhikes to Canada, leaving behind his pregnant girlfriend and everything he owns.

The tone of the film definitely doesn't match On the Road's, but I did identify with Nicholson's character immensely. Not that I'd been a prodigy at anything, but I'd certainly been destined for a better life than the one I ended up having. At least if I'd stayed in school—ignoring the immense blackness and continual need to hide—I could have had a future of meeting my parents' expectations, instead of one they only ever spoke about when I left the room, when my mum didn't think I could hear her crying.

And not that my parents were as disapproving as Nicholson's father: They were understanding in their own confused way. But they, too, couldn't transcend their shortcomings to get a grip on mine. Instead, they thought I was completely culpable in what was happening—that, if I really wanted to, I could "cheer up" and turn my life around.

[body_image width='1200' height='675' path='images/content-images/2014/11/13/' crop='images/content-images-crops/2014/11/13/' filename='i-thought-becoming-jack-kerouac-would-cure-my-depression-284-body-image-1415878555.jpg' id='3589']

The author, trying to find peace on the road 

Back then, though, these things felt less worrying than my perception of the road having been tainted. In Five Easy Pieces, the road wasn't really a place to find yourself or cure any depression. It was a place to get lost.

I began wondering if my understanding of On the Road was false, if—through weakness—I'd distorted it into something grossly one-dimensional. Years later, I read it again. Though rife with moments where Kerouac seems cured of his own depression (what he calls, in the book's opening lines, the "feeling that everything was dead"), the transience of these moments felt much more apparent second time around. Ultimately, I admit that On the Road and Five Easy Pieces essentially came to the same conclusion, one that Kerouac couldn't bring himself to express all that clearly when writing the book, but one he must have screamed from the rooftops while drinking himself to death at 47—that the road can't cure anyone.

At 19, though, I told myself that it could, that there were endless things capable of curing me if only I had the strength to master them. Surely—if I was weak—strength was the perfect antidote.

§

As time passed I began to live, making it to mainland Europe where I finally got a job. In the end, getting one was nothing. No one cared if I was depressed as long as I did what I was supposed to. Unfortunately, that was even more depressing, as—for years—I'd lingered on my illness, and then: nothing.

I travelled, too, but not like Kerouac—more three-star hotels than weed and fever dreams on a bed in a Mexican brothel. Eventually I had to confront the fact that I wasn't Kerouac, lacking the bravery to do things his pure, unprotected way.

As a result, travelling and living abroad frustrated me. I should have gone in two-footed, but, all over the world, I was too timid to talk to strangers, too shy to enter intimidating-looking bars, too weary to stay up past 4. Bullshit stuff, but for me, too-frequent reminders of the boy who'd spent years hiding from life.

Looking back, was I hiding? I think I was—but my limitations back then didn't allow for anything else. Really, if I'm honest, I didn't accept that these limitations even existed until recently, and it's only now that I can begin to judge myself against what I'm actually capable of, rather than against the myths given to me by books, films and the internet.

Yes, it would have been nice to have gone to uni, to have done tons of drugs and become Jack Kerouac, but I couldn't do what my body wouldn't allow me, couldn't be who my mind wouldn't let me to be.

[body_image width='1200' height='770' path='images/content-images/2014/11/13/' crop='images/content-images-crops/2014/11/13/' filename='i-thought-becoming-jack-kerouac-would-cure-my-depression-284-body-image-1415878644.jpg' id='3591']

The author, having a crack at the Kerouac experience

Now, at 27, I'm back in Ireland and the Celtic Tiger has been dead for almost a decade. Maybe it's because it is dead—or maybe because I now expect less from what's essentially just a mass of land—but the country does seem slightly less horrendous than it used to.

One thing which isn't dead, though, is my depression. Lately, in fact, it's become a good bit worse. I don't think this is the product of added stress—recently, life has been going pretty well. With writing, I've finally found the perfect outlet to talk about this stuff, earning a little money in the process. I'm now in the privileged position of being able to look back on my teenage traumas and say that maybe they were fate, that while others were raking it in during the Celtic Tiger, securing loans that they now can't afford to repay, I was learning how to live on almost nothing; and while others were going to uni, reading the same books I was reading but only talking about them in coffee shops, I was in my bedroom, alone, learning how to fucking write.

So, today, I wake in the middle of the night and worry about endless shit. My days, they blur together. Very few joyful experiences take place. Though I'm happy with my writing, satisfied with some other stuff, I'm afraid that these things will soon become unsustainable. I'm afraid that—like it did when I was a teenager—the cloud of depression that's forever on my horizon will again move in and envelop everything.

"IN THE END, MY OBSESSION WITH THE ROAD COMES FROM HOPE"

Something else which isn't dead, obviously, is my obsession with the road. So lately, maybe in desperation, I've been wondering if its benefits are as transient as everything suggests, if I could still travel in Kerouac's pure, unprotected way and cure this illness.

But I've wondered about this enough to know I'll never take that step. I think, at 27, I've tried all that I'm going to try: meditation, medication, religion, exercise, therapy, to name but a few things. That's not to say that I've tried everything there is, or that I've done all these things correctly, only that—after a decade of pushing myself to the brink, pouring time, money and my heart into different treatments, different methods and different doctors—something eventually has to give.

Did I think I needed the road at 19 because, actually—like Kerouac's generation—I wanted to rebel? Certainly, my vague ambitions did extend to not wanting to end up like my parents, eking out a living while taking shit from people who didn't deserve that power, ultimately being so racked with fear that, if my son came down with a serious mental illness, I could barely even speak about it, much less get him help.

But to say I truly wanted to rebel would be bullshit.

I think, in the end, my obsession with the road comes from hope—not hope that there's a cure to this depression, but that there's an easy answer. I think, if I hit the road, everything will be fine. I think, if I drink that shot, take that pill, see that therapist, I'll be a completely different person.

Over the years, it's been easier to stomach this—that there are endless things capable of curing me—rather than the more hopeless reality. Reality has never been my strong suit; even when Five Easy Pieces tainted my one-dimensional view of the road, even when I learned Kerouac had drunk himself to death, I still told myself that my initial, addled perception was correct.

It was at this point, I suspect, that the road became a punishment. I began beating myself over the head with it to atone not only for what I'd let happen in dropping out of school, but also for what I was letting happen every day of my life by being such a pussy. Also, I can't help but question whether my interest in America was real, if I wasn't just torturing myself by obsessing over a country which—lacking a university education—I'd never get a visa for. Why else did I know more about the Ford Model T than any car I'd ever actually driven? Why else do I know more about the Great Depression than any event in Irish history?

But despite all this—all the delusion and bullshit—I did always think I'd overcome it. Never did I see myself in old age still battling depression, having endured it for 30, 40, 50 more years. Soon, something would come along and save me.

§

Now, however, I feel I must resign myself to the possibility that such a future awaits. And though I tell myself to be stronger, to quit being such a pussy—because this is what I've always done—I've tried that enough times to know it doesn't work, either. Calling myself a pussy is just another easy answer—my whole life I've looked for easy answers and now it's time, finally, to face reality, stop hiding and let go of the fallacy that, with them, I can cure this complicated illness.

Can I let go, however, after all this time? I can certainly afford to. Though reality may be more hopeless than I'd like, I know I ultimately lack the bravery not just to hit the road in the pure, unprotected sense, but also to kill myself. Ironically, the fear that keeps me from becoming Jack Kerouac is probably the same fear that keeps me alive.

Mainly, though, I'm too tired not to let go, tired of being depressed but really fucking tired of having hope that—like a road not taken—doesn't lead anywhere.

Maybe I am weak. But I feel now like I need to accept the inevitable and admit that, whatever it is—weakness or depression—it'll probably be a part of me forever, and if a cure does exist, it won't be something I can force or even hold in my hands. It'll be time, or luck, or something I haven't thought of yet. I don't know—but I do know for sure it won't be a pill, calling myself a pussy, or the road. And for the first time in my life, that's kind of OK.

Follow James Nolan on ​Twitter

Wrestling Is Gay

$
0
0

Ben McNutt is a Baltimore-based artist who is engaged in an intensive study of his perspective on images of wrestling. His work combines depictions of wrestling throughout history with his own unique aesthetic. Below, you'll find an essay comprised of photos and words that he made for VICE, titled "Undying Homoeroticism in Wrestling." 

[body_image width='1000' height='754' path='images/content-images/2014/11/12/' crop='images/content-images-crops/2014/11/12/' filename='wrestling-is-gay-body-image-1415832256.jpg' id='3494']

These images depict men wrestling alongside men. 

[body_image width='1000' height='1251' path='images/content-images/2014/11/12/' crop='images/content-images-crops/2014/11/12/' filename='wrestling-is-gay-body-image-1415832267.jpg' id='3495']

These men wear tight-fitting singlets, garments, or nothing at all. 

[body_image width='1000' height='1222' path='images/content-images/2014/11/12/' crop='images/content-images-crops/2014/11/12/' filename='wrestling-is-gay-body-image-1415832305.jpg' id='3497']

If they do wear clothing, it is tight against their torsos, chest, and thighs, revealing the shapes of their often muscular bodies. 

[body_image width='1000' height='723' path='images/content-images/2014/11/12/' crop='images/content-images-crops/2014/11/12/' filename='wrestling-is-gay-body-image-1415832327.jpg' id='3498']

They fall, roll, dip, and jump onto the ground, which acts as a platform for each wrestler to pin their opponent against. 

[body_image width='1000' height='1505' path='images/content-images/2014/11/12/' crop='images/content-images-crops/2014/11/12/' filename='wrestling-is-gay-body-image-1415832341.jpg' id='3499']

They grab, touch, pull, and push one another. 

[body_image width='1000' height='671' path='images/content-images/2014/11/12/' crop='images/content-images-crops/2014/11/12/' filename='wrestling-is-gay-body-image-1415832356.jpg' id='3500']

These men are physically strong. 

[body_image width='1000' height='1163' path='images/content-images/2014/11/12/' crop='images/content-images-crops/2014/11/12/' filename='wrestling-is-gay-body-image-1415832376.jpg' id='3501']

Their muscles are on display for their opponents and viewers alike. 

[body_image width='1000' height='697' path='images/content-images/2014/11/12/' crop='images/content-images-crops/2014/11/12/' filename='wrestling-is-gay-body-image-1415832394.jpg' id='3502']

[body_image width='1000' height='1250' path='images/content-images/2014/11/12/' crop='images/content-images-crops/2014/11/12/' filename='wrestling-is-gay-body-image-1415832409.jpg' id='3503']

Neither member appears to have boundaries on where they will and won't go in order to gain dominance.

[body_image width='1000' height='1333' path='images/content-images/2014/11/12/' crop='images/content-images-crops/2014/11/12/' filename='wrestling-is-gay-body-image-1415832423.jpg' id='3504']

Their bodies are pushed up against one another as hard as they will go. 

[body_image width='1000' height='1651' path='images/content-images/2014/11/12/' crop='images/content-images-crops/2014/11/12/' filename='wrestling-is-gay-body-image-1415832437.jpg' id='3505']

[body_image width='1000' height='1203' path='images/content-images/2014/11/12/' crop='images/content-images-crops/2014/11/12/' filename='wrestling-is-gay-body-image-1415832449.jpg' id='3506']

They use their strength to exert control over their opponents' bodies. 

[body_image width='1000' height='1555' path='images/content-images/2014/11/12/' crop='images/content-images-crops/2014/11/12/' filename='wrestling-is-gay-body-image-1415832474.jpg' id='3507']

[body_image width='1000' height='1455' path='images/content-images/2014/11/12/' crop='images/content-images-crops/2014/11/12/' filename='wrestling-is-gay-body-image-1415832490.jpg' id='3508']

[body_image width='1000' height='1347' path='images/content-images/2014/11/12/' crop='images/content-images-crops/2014/11/12/' filename='wrestling-is-gay-body-image-1415832501.jpg' id='3509']

Sweat drips onto the floor, themselves, and one another. 

[body_image width='1000' height='1183' path='images/content-images/2014/11/12/' crop='images/content-images-crops/2014/11/12/' filename='wrestling-is-gay-body-image-1415832512.jpg' id='3510']

Each limb is entangled around another. Their arms are wrapped around thighs, biceps, and stomachs. 

[body_image width='1000' height='1217' path='images/content-images/2014/11/12/' crop='images/content-images-crops/2014/11/12/' filename='wrestling-is-gay-body-image-1415832525.jpg' id='3511']

The pace is fast and forceful. In a split second, anything can change. 

[body_image width='1000' height='729' path='images/content-images/2014/11/12/' crop='images/content-images-crops/2014/11/12/' filename='wrestling-is-gay-body-image-1415832706.jpg' id='3515']

Their hands grasp onto the other's body as tight as their strength will allow.

[body_image width='1000' height='613' path='images/content-images/2014/11/12/' crop='images/content-images-crops/2014/11/12/' filename='wrestling-is-gay-body-image-1415832606.jpg' id='3514']

One wins, and one loses.

See more of Ben's work on his ​website

I Spent Halloween in a Satanist's Crypt

$
0
0

[body_image width='1200' height='800' path='images/content-images/2014/11/13/' crop='images/content-images-crops/2014/11/13/' filename='i-spent-halloween-in-a-satanists-bungalow-crypt-666-body-image-1415888812.jpg' id='3630']

The author with Phil the Satanist

This post originally appeared in VICE UK​ 

I don't like Halloween. I never really have. So, at the end of last month—with October 31 and its accompanying monotony of drunk, bleeding faces fast approaching—I figured I should try to coax some enjoyment out of the experience for the first time in my life. The best way to do that, I decided, was to spend the evening with a Satanist.

While media coverage of Satanism tends to err on the horse-mutilation side of things, my Satanist friend Phil Mawson—who, granted, does work at a butcher shop—actually prefers devoting his time to revising the work of Anton LaVey, author of the Satanic Bible and founder of the Church of Satan. Still, I couldn't help but tread a little nervously as I approached the door of his crypt, a bungalow in Cornwall, England.

Inside, I immediately realized that I had no need to fret. Instead of trying to carve a pentagram into my shin, Phil kicked off our night together by explaining that he denies the existence of both God and the Devil. This is the LaVeyan brand of Satanism, where—in layman's terms—followers are atheists using Satan as a symbol for the self. If you're looking for full-blown Devil worshippers, you'd be better off visiting the website for the Order of Nine Angles, or hanging out in a graveyard in Whitby .

[body_image width='1200' height='800' path='images/content-images/2014/11/13/' crop='images/content-images-crops/2014/11/13/' filename='i-spent-halloween-in-a-satanists-bungalow-crypt-666-body-image-1415888873.jpg' id='3631']

I remarked that Phil has lots of spooky stuff in his single bedroom, and asked him exactly how much Satanic memorabilia he's collected over the years. "I wouldn't have a clue; it's beyond counting. Let's just count it as infinite," he said. "And it grows all the time—people say that I haven't got room for anything else in my place, but I tell them, 'Well, you make room.'"

Next to the seven-foot farm scythe in the corner of Phil's bedroom was a large sound system. It turns out that Anton LaVey not only wrote the Satanic Bible, but also released a studio album titled  ​Satan Takes a Holiday. This—a collection of melodic organ jams—was disc number one on our party playlist. After lighting some candles to round off the chamber vibes, Phil started to introduce me to his "familiars".

[body_image width='1200' height='1945' path='images/content-images/2014/11/13/' crop='images/content-images-crops/2014/11/13/' filename='i-spent-halloween-in-a-satanists-bungalow-crypt-666-body-image-1415888923.jpg' id='3632']

These were the seven real animal skulls dotted around his room, including those of a badger, a goat, a rabbit and a fox. He directed my gaze towards the largest—a cow's head hung on the wall, tattooed with the Star of David and dressed up in Satanic jewelery. "This one is a cow's head I found on Dartmoor," Phil explained. "I brought that home and cleaned it up, decorated it and, if you'll excuse the pun, gave it a new lease of life."

He went on to detail how he's only been living as a Satanist for just over ten years, spending most of his life studying theology and a small portion as a Jehovah's Witness.

"The Jehovah's Witnesses had a big influence on our family for several years—that was 30-odd years ago," he told me. "I managed to get all of my family out of that brainwashing cult. Then some Evangelicals approached us with a different message. I took a big interest in that and I did theology for two years. When I saw how it was all put together—the man-made dogmas and the shocking history of Christianity—I became disillusioned with that. I would've had to commit intellectual suicide to go along with it."

[body_image width='1200' height='1800' path='images/content-images/2014/11/13/' crop='images/content-images-crops/2014/11/13/' filename='i-spent-halloween-in-a-satanists-bungalow-crypt-666-body-image-1415888939.jpg' id='3633']

Interested by his negative opinion of the "cult", I asked what exactly it is—in Phil's mind—that sets Jehovah's Witnesses apart from other common faiths in the UK.

"Jehovah's Witnesses are classed as heretics by the church because they deny the trinity. Not only that, but they have quasi-religious beliefs," he said. "The blood transfusion issue—they have killed more people than David Koresh or Jim Jones. Jones caused around 930 people to die in the jungles of Guyana; Koresh, 80-odd people. Jehovah's Witnesses kill thousands upon thousands each year through their doctrine of non-blood transfusion, so they're a killer cult. They tried to turn my family against me, but fortunately they saw the light and abandoned the movement as well."

[body_image width='1200' height='1800' path='images/content-images/2014/11/13/' crop='images/content-images-crops/2014/11/13/' filename='i-spent-halloween-in-a-satanists-bungalow-crypt-666-body-image-1415889056.jpg' id='3634']

Phil went on to describe his discovery of Satanism as like walking out of a mist.

"When I first read the Satanic Bible, it was like looking in a mirror—it tells us what we are inside: don't be a hypocrite, don't deny ourselves like religion tells us to deny ourselves with all the, 'Thou shall nots...'" he said. "The Satanic Bible says celebrate your life, because this is not a dress rehearsal for something else. You must make this life count because you're not going to get another one. That is the freedom you get with the philosophy of Satanism.

"The Bible says, 'Do unto others as you would have them do unto you.' I think that's Matthew 7. Now, that leaves yourself open to being used or abused by people. The Satanic Bible, on the other hand, says, 'Do good to those who deserve it and do not waste it on ingrates.' The Bible says, 'Whoever slaps you on the left cheek, turn your right also onto him.' The Satanic Bible says, 'Whoever slaps you on the left cheek, you smash them on the right.'"

Besides the skull hoarding, Satanism actually seems like a pretty decent way to to live you life. I wasn't quite ready to convert by the end of our evening, but I had learned a couple of things I didn't know before, and—quietly, among it all—enjoyed Halloween for the first time ever. So there's the lesson: next year, when someone like me starts boring you with their Halloween complaints, send them to a Satanist.

Are British Conservatives Really Pro-LGBT or Just Pinkwashing the Vote?

$
0
0

This post originally appeared in VICE UK

"Just because a person is LGBT does not mean that they are always left-wing," claims th​is Conservative election flyer. It continues in a similar vein; lots of LGBT individuals have "a larger amount of disposable income," which makes them "naturally conservative."

Apparently, not all gays are wet, liberal paupers, and efforts should be made to secure their votes and money. Luckily, the LGBT​ories are on hand to guide prospective MPs through the daunting process of huckstering with those of an LGBT persuasion.

In 2010, to distance itself from historic homophobia (Section ​28, banning the "promotion" of homosexuality in schools, excluding homosexuals from the right adopt and failing to lower the age of consent) the Conservative party published its Contract for Equali​ties—a pre-election pledge to tackle prejudice against minorities, women and the disabled. "Make no mistake: the Conservative Party has changed," it claims. It's a dramatic departure from the previous Conservative government, a swing embodied by Cameron, who set about doggedly championing LGBT rights after a brief apo​logy for supporting Section 28 to its pitiful end.

Same-sex marriage might be the sparkly lip-gloss in this rainbow makeover, but wipe away the superficial make-up, look at the number of "out" Tory MPs, and there are signs that these profound gestures are, in fact, acts of pinkwashing.

Marriage hasn't halted the disproportional levels of violence, verbal abuse and institutional homophobia in the UK or further afield, and greater LGBT representation in parliament has done little to improve the specialist health services needed or reduce homophobic bullying in schools.

"I support gay marriage because I'm a Conservative," said Cameron. But more than half the Conservative party felt otherwise. 128 voted against the bi​ll, 117 for. From introduction to legislation the pledge faced devout opposition: Tory MPs called the move arrogant, pondered whether it would lead to inter-sibling marriage and demanded sincere apologies for its introduction. Donors threatened to join UKIP, while its Grassroots organization even called for a change in leadership.

Backing it was a brave and admirable decision from Cameron and other senior figures, but the reality is that it happened in spite of the Conservatives, not because of them. Using it to advocate their favorable LGBT record is questionable.

Foreign Policy
​Still, in terms of legislation Britain is now one of the most progressive countries in the world. Exporting this should be a priority for our government. "The Prime Minister publicly challenged the Qatar government on its attitude to LGBT freedom on a recent visit," states another LGBTory lea​flet; yet while simultaneously arming the despotic regime that persecutes them, it doesn't. No one expects the British government to obliterate homophobia worldwide, but some consistency and transparency wouldn't go amiss.

"There's no doubt that both successive Labour and Conservative governments have exhibited double standards when it comes to LGBTI human rights abuses in other countries"—Peter Tatchell

"There's no doubt that both successive labour and conservative governments have exhibited double standards when it comes to LGBTI human rights abuses in other countries," says human rights campaigner Peter Tatchell. "There's been a lot of vocal criticism of Uganda but virtually none against Saudi Arabia. I suspect the double standards are driven by economic interests. Saudi Arabia is, to my regret, one of Britain's major trading partners; they buy our weapons, we buy their oil. It seems like trade has trumped human rights, so far as the Saudi regime is concerned."

Giving oil rich allies a free pass while condemning others certainly waters down the message; human rights shouldn't be mud to tarnish reputations and score political points. Though it's not a stance exclusive to the current government, the message is clear: It doesn't matter if homosexuality is punishable by life imprisonment or death if you're a key trading partner.

"No British government has ever done enough," says Tatchell. "If racial persecution was on the same scale globally as homophobia you can bet the UK government and the whole international community would be making a much bigger fuss. So far the Commonwealth Heads of Government Meeting has never discussed LGBTI rights at any point in its entire history. For the last 30 years that I've been involved any such discussion has been vetoed. Successive British governments have not lobbied hard enough to get LGBTI rights on the commonwealth agenda."

Community Services
Inevitably, an area Conservatives have demonstrated a dogmatic commitment to equality is through austerity. Volunteer services are integral to LGBT community, providing everything from health advice to housing assistance, coming out guidance to support for victims of domestic abuse and hate crimes. A significant proportion of the sector's income stems from public funds and a T​UC report published earlier this year emphasizes the severity of cuts.

Public funding for some organizations interviewed had been cut by as much as 50 percent, while just under half had made redundancies. Across the sector there's been a perceived loss of specialists as they seek job security elsewhere, and the lingering climate of uncertainty and increasing workloads has led to higher stress levels in those who remain. For some, the cuts were so drastic and rapid they were able to successfully take public bodies to court, citing the 2010 Equality Act. Many suspect the worst cuts are still to come, that equality was now much lower on the political agenda.

GM​FA, a charity produced by gay men for gay men, is dedicated to providing sexual health information through its website and FS mag​azine, which receives about 105,000 visitors each month and 100,000 readers each issue. Its entire annual running expenditure of £360,000 is equivalent to the lifetime cost of treating one person living with HIV (estimated between £280,000 and £340,000). If GMFA prevents one person per year from HIV infection it effectively pays for itself.

As an indirect result of the Health and Social Care Act 2012, the charity lost the bulk of its funding and now relies on rapidly dwindling reserves, charitable giving and social media campaigns, like its current #Pant​s​2HIV mission, which has already raised £1,600 and cou​nting since the beginning of October. The black hole left by a complete withdrawal of statutory funding meant numerous redundancies and cuts to services.

"When we lost this money we had to streamline the organization," says chief executive Matthew Hodson. "We had to scale back some of the services we offered, like reducing the print run of our FS magazine by 10,000 per issue. We had to stop some completely, like our online service that enabled users to ask personalized sexual health questions. But there's no one else providing the same kind of frank, engaging sexual health information for gay men that we are, so we had to carry on."

"We've made every effort to get our running costs as low as possible while still providing useful and accessible information resources. Through the sale of our old office building, some of the small contracts we hold and fundraising efforts, we've got enough to keep delivering until early 2016 but we'll need substantial new funding to continue our HIV prevention work beyond then."

Schools
While the foreign office conducts its pro-LGBT crusades with inexplicable discretion, education secretaries Nicky Morgan and Michael Gove have been extremely vocal in their ambition to tackle homophobic bullying in schools, working closely with organisations like Stonewall and challenging head teachers to show stronger leadership.

"I think we've seen some really clear senior leadership from them which is fantastic"—Richard Lane, Media Manager at Stonewall

"I think we've seen some really clear senior leadership from them which is fantastic," says Richard Lane, Media Manager at Stonewall. "Under his [Gove's] leadership, Ofsted made it an absolutely explicit requirement that schools had to tackle homophobic bullying. Anyone who's been to a school or spoken to school governors knows the power that framework and inspections have in driving an agenda. The fact that homophobic bullying is so explicitly mentioned is very significant."

Looking at Stonewall's 2014 school rep​ort, though, suggests that this leadership and legislative change has yet to trickle down completely. Only 17 percent of secondary school teachers say they've received specific training for tackling LGBT bullying. 34 percent say they have not addressed issues of sexual orientation in the classroom at all and 45 percent say their schools still don't have any specific policies in place to deal with homophobia. More worryingly, "no real improvement" has been seen in the proportion of teachers who believe that heads and governors have shown clear leadership on the matter.

It's hoped that Nicky Morgan's recent £2 mi​llion pledge to creative anti-homophobic programmes will prove more successful in both training teachers and promoting LGBT issues. And while their top-down "lead by example" approach may have had limited impact, it has certainly helped banish the haunting stigma of Section 28.

"At Stonewall we judge people by how they perform when they're in office," says Lane. "Back in 2010, those who could recall the last Conservative government remembered one where section 28 was still in place, where gay people couldn't serve in the military, where there was no such thing as civil partnerships or adoption rights. There was huge scepticism. I don't think that's the case anymore."

Though there are probably fringe elements of homophobia in every major UK political party, the heavy backlash Cameron faced for introducing same-sex marriage is indicative. Any claim that the Conservatives are now an unequivocally pro-LGBT party is smoke and mirrors, though. It's pinkwashing. Look past the emblematic gestures and their policies have levelled savage cuts on community services and had minimal impact on homophobia in schools or abroad.

But for Colm Howard-Lloyd, chairman of the LGBTories, the current Conservative government has done enough to repair damage of the previous and appease a community they so badly ostracized. "It's not going to be repaired overnight and we're not converting [LGBT] people who vote Labour to vote Conservative," he says.

"But there's going to be a significant number of floating LGBT voters in the next election—more than before—who can now make a genuine choice based on their beliefs. Previously there were a lot of people who felt that, as an LGBT person, they had to vote Labour as they were the only party who supported them. I think we've now removed that barrier."

Whether these floating LGBT voters agree remains to be seen.

Follow Chris Godfrey on ​Twitter

Identifying 'Criminal' Genes Will Never Prevent Violence But Might Help Explain It

$
0
0

[body_image width='1200' height='800' path='images/content-images/2014/11/13/' crop='images/content-images-crops/2014/11/13/' filename='identifying-crime-genes-will-never-prevent-violence-but-might-help-explain-it-1113-body-image-1415882839.jpg' id='3606']​

Photo via Flickr user ​Ian Britton

The subjects of a new Finnish study who helped establish the link between two genes and violent crime were an especially savage bunch. The group of 78 prisoners had committed more than 1,500 of the most brutal offenses in the criminal landscape—murder, manslaughter, attempted murder, and battery, according to the study, released in Nature at ​the end of last month. They also shared variations of two genes: Monoamine oxidase A (MAOA, also known as the "Warrior Gene") and CDH13. Basically, the combination of these two genes was bad for the study's subjects, and even worse for their victims.

"No substantial signal was observed for either MAOA or CDH13 among non-violent offenders, indicating that findings were specific for violent offending," the authors wrote. The 78 most violent prisoners were part of a larger group in the study, but represented the most concrete connection between the two genes and heinous crimes.

MAOA metabolizes dopamine, that wonderful hormone we feel surging through our bodies when lighting up a cigarette or taking a sip of liquor. The most violent offenders in the study—that group of 78—likely had larger bursts of dopamine when alcohol, cocaine, or other drugs were introduced into their systems. Those subjects also had a larger amount of "dopaminergic activity" than the average person, even without the addition of drugs, which can lead to aggressive behavior. Meanwhile, CDH13—to avoid some wonky scientific language—is a gene that affects switches in the brain most often associated with ADHD.

Both genes are "rather common," one of the study's authors, Jari Tiihonen, wrote me in an email, and can be found in 20 percent of the world's population. And, while the combination of MAOA and CDH13 represents a "risk of about 13-fold compared with the 'usual' genotype combination" for committing violent crimes, the majority of people with the gene combo won't be hacking up their families any time soon. Despite our national fascination with the daily drudgery of crime stories, incidents of violence are relatively low in developed countries. In the US, crime rates have been falling steadily for years, including a 5.4 percent drop in violent crimes in the first six months of 2013 compared to the same period of 2012, ac​cording to the FBI.

Speculation runs rampant as to why crime has dropped. Everything from harsh prison sentences to concealed carry are cited as reasons for the trend. But, like the rationale for committing crimes in the first place, the real answer is much more complex. And it's probably safe to say that it's far more complicated than the science behind Tiihonen's study.

"This is not a system where everybody that has a certain gene turns out to be violent," said Lawrence Kobilinsky, a professor in the forensic sciences department at the John Jay College of Criminal Justice in New York.

Anyone with a minimal knowledge of criminology knows that, starting with the increased urbanization that went into overdrive with the Industrial Revolution, the causes of crime are many and varied. Living conditions, access to basic services, income level, education and housing all play large roles. In addition to these factors and Tiihonen's two genes is the overwhelmingly influential role of environment—your brain has something to do with it, but your block​ matt​ers a hell of a lot, too.

"It seems to me that one's environment plays at least as important of a role, if not more so, than genetics," Kobilinsky said. "Even if one has genes that predisposes people to certain behavior, there's so many other factors that I don't know how much credence to put into that."

Like most things, the majority of gene science research has to do with money. There are obvious profits to be had if someone can identify genes that lead to cancer, heart disease, or other conditions that reduce life expectancy. But the field of behavioral gene research is more dependent on curiosity outside the bounds of capitalism. For decades, scientists have worked to identify genes associated with certain behaviors—autism and ADD, for instance—and even sexual orientation. But as with all things done by  humans, the hardware inside our heads is only part of the equation. A person with the genes identified in the Finnish study may be more inclined to carrying out a brutal murder, but they're less likely to do so if they haven't undergone a litany of tragic experiences or been reared in a violent and poverty-stricken neighborhood.

In fact, Kobilinsky said, some people born with the Warrior Gene and others like it have done quite well for themselves.

"If you're on Wall Street, you want aggressive behavior because you want success," he told me. "But just because you have a certain gene doesn't mean you're going to have violent behavior."

The ruthlessness on display by those playing with absurd amounts of money is no different than street criminals deciding it's easier to off a competitor than to make a deal with him. Again, it all depends on perspective and environment. Making money is good. Making money through murder is bad, generally speaking.

"Twin studies," in which two people with identical genetics but dissimilar environments make different decisions, demonstrate this, according to Kobilinsky. In his analogy, the Wall Street banker with a dopamine deficiency—like the one found in Finnish study's subjects—would make decisions seen as more acceptable by society than his twin in the ghetto, where most would probably agree there are a different set of rules.

For those equipped with genes associated with violence, their identification might be more helpful at the tail-end of the criminal justice apparatus than the beginning. Unless we're going to start quarantining anyone with these genes at birth, and placing them in a padded room to ensure they don't kill anyone or ruin our economy with disastrous speculative lending practices, the study's results are just another piece of the puzzle.

"I think where this goes is, someone who commits a crime, they might raise this as a mitigating factor in their sentencing," Kobilinksy said. "That it wasn't a person's fault because they were genetically predisposed to violence."

If a defense attorney can cit​e "affluenza" as the reason why a rich kid from Texas got drunk and killed four people with his pickup truck, it stands to reason that actual science, in addition to environment, might explain why some crimes occur. 

Follow Justin Glawe on Twit​ter.


The Feral Cats of Disneyland

$
0
0

Photo via Flickr user Lo​ren Javier

The cats—former pets, strays, and other assorted felines roaming Southern California—have been in Disneyland basically since the amusement park opened in 1955. They m​ay have come originally to feast on bits of food left by visitors, but they probably stayed because there remain a limitless number of places to hide and hunt rats. Today you can spot them along the tracks near Main Street Station, or perched on the cliffs of Big Thunder Trail, or lounging around White Water Snacks. Disney didn't tell park visitors about the feral cat colony that came to inhabit the Happiest Place on Earth, but the company quietly instituted a policy of neutering, vaccinating, and tagging all the felines in the Magic Kingdom.

"They called us because they had some kitties that needed to be fixed," said Karn Myers, the co-founder of no-kill animal rescue organizations Best Friends Catnippers and FixNation. In 2001, Disney let Catnippers onto the park grounds to help run what's known as a trap-neuter-return (TNR) program, meaning the cats would be sterilized and monitored but not euthanized or evicted from the premises. The company wanted to keep it all under wraps, however. "We couldn't say a thing about the work we were doing there," Myers said. (Even today, Disney wouldn't comment about the cats for this article, though a spokesperson said there were about 100 currently roaming the Disneyland grounds.)

In 2007, the partnership ended, and today the cats are taken care of by the park's workers with help from local veterinary clinics. There are feeding stations and shelters where the cats receive routine veterinary care, including flea treatments, spaying and neutering, and vaccinations.

The cats were still unknown to the general public until 2010, when theLos Angeles Times published a re​port on what happens at the park after hours. It was an upbeat article that highlighted the hardworking efforts of Disney employees, but writer Hugo Martin said the company wasn't totally satisfied. "After my article appeared, [Disneyland representatives] said they got some positive feedback from animal rights groups but they wished it hadn't gotten so much attention," he told me. "As for talking to me on the record about this, they had no choice. I was walking around Disneyland at about 2 AM when I spotted cats walking around the theme park."

Photo via Flickr user Sam ​Howzit

Since then, the amusement park has drawn p​raise from cat-lovers, who say that TNR programs are a way to control feral populations without throwing the felines into shelters—where most of them will inevitably be euthanized. Disney's treatment of its cats stands in contrast to Universal Orlando's Loews Hotel, which found itself caught up in controversy a couple years ago after it removed its feral cats and sent them to an animal control center. TNR advocates condemned the move as"hypocritical and h​eartless,"but a hotel spokesperson told the Orlando Sentinel that according to Florida's Department of Health, "feral cats pose a continuous concern to communities due to the persistent threat of injury and disease," and that hotel's priority was "the health and safety of our guests and team members."

The problem with feral cats is that they can carry loads of bacteria, viruses, and parasites—nasty little critters that may cause rabies, toxoplasmosis, plague, tularemia, and murine typhus, among other illnesses. Even with TNR programs like Disneyland, some ​studies say, these packs of half-wild animals can still cause health problems in humans they come in contact with. And though they may kill some rats, they can also decimate local bird populations.

Photo via Flickr user Mere​dith P.

"They deserve to have a home," Teresa Chagrin, an animal care and control specialist at PETA, told me. "All of these resources should instead be put into preventing animal homelessness in the first place."

Though it obviously doesn't support euthanizing strays, the famously strident animal rights group also opposes TNR programs, which it refers to as "re-abandonment." Instead, Chagrin said, "PETA would want the socialized cats to be given the chance to find good, permanent, indoor homes."

Travis Longcore, the science director at the Urban Wildlands, a conservationist group based in Southern California, agrees that TNR isn't a solution. In 2008, the Urban Wildlands joined a collection of bird and wildlife groups to challenge Los Angeles's citywide feral cat policies; the coalition successfully petitioned for an injunction that barred city animal services from adopting trap-neuter-return programs pending environmental review. "TNR is about stopping euthanasia in shelters—it's not about animal control," said Longcore. "It goes to the moral determination that the lives of feral cats are more important than any of the consequences that may occur by leaving them outside."

Judging by the con​troversy ignited by that 2010 TNR court decision however, Longcore and PETA are in the minority. Most animal rights activists seem confident that TNR is a humane and safe way to handle feral cats, and Disney seems similarly sanguine about the situation. Most park visitors, of course, don't care about all this—if they spot the cats at all, they'll just wonder what movie franchise the adorable feral creatures stepped out of.

Follow Kyle Jaeger onT​witter.

VICE News: Libya: A Broken State

$
0
0

Three years after the Libyan revolution and the subsequent downfall of its dictator Muammar Qaddafi, the country has descended further into chaos and insecurity. Rebel militias, radical Islamists, and former Qaddafi commander Khalifa Haftar are among the different groups vying for power and oil wealth, creating a vacuum in which violence and militancy reign supreme.

VICE News filmmaker Medyan Dairieh was in Libya in 2011 to witness the revolution. This year, he returned to follow members of the 17th February battalion, a rebel group fighting against Haftar's forces. Dairieh witnessed first-hand how life after the Libyan revolution has devolved into lawlessness and Islamic State–linked extremism.

Meet the Radical Veterinarians Who Want to Dehorn Rhinos Before Poachers Can

How to Keep Kids off the Grass

$
0
0

In the heat of political debate, there's a tendency for supporters of cannabis legalization to deny that anything could go wrong. But even if many of the harms are either entirely imaginary or grossly exaggerated, plenty are real and important. As we move toward legalization, we should be alert to the problem of minimizing the risks.

For instance, it's foolish to deny that legalization will likely increase the number of teenagers who start using heavily and add to the pool of adults who have problems controlling their marijuana use. The RAND Corporation estimate​s that legalization—without extremely high taxes—could drop pre-tax cannabis prices to below 20 percent of current levels, and younger users—especially heavy smokers—are especially sensitive to prices. The number of marijuana users hasn't changed much over the past two decades, but the number of heavy consumers has soared up sevenfold from its low point in 1992.

Supporters and opponents of cannabis legalization agree on the importance of preventing an increase in underage use. The Department of Justice has asserted "preventing distribution to minors" as one of eight guideli​nes that states should follow in order to avoid federal intervention. But there's no reason to think that the policies proposed for keeping cannabis out of the hands of minors once it's legal for adults are up to the task.

Authorities in Washington and Colorado appear determined to make it much more difficult for minors to buy store cannabis than it currently is for them to buy tobacco or alcohol. Historically, the laws against selling alcohol and tobacco to minors have been enforced only sporadically​, and it turns out that enforcing them more aggressively—for example, by sending undercover youth buyers into stores to attempt purchase without identification—can succeed in reducing underage drinking and its attendant harms. Both Colorado and Washington propose to apply that model to cannabis with special force, with more frequent inspections and stiffer penalties.

But just enforcing the law against direct sales to minors can't meet the promises that governments have made to voters. When minors can't buy alcohol from stores, they "borrow" from their parents' supplies, find older friends or relatives willing to buy for them, or look for the drunk outside the liquor store willing to buy a case in return for keeping a couple of beers for himself. Store purchase accounts for only 10 percent of drinks consumed by minors; with tobacco, a bit more ​than half (53 percent) of past-month underage smokers bought from a store in that period. Why should we expect cannabis to be different?

Indeed, it could well be worse. A pack of cigarettes is worth $5 to $10 in most places and weighs about an ounce; an ounce of cannabis—the legal purchase limit in Colorado and Washington—is worth 50 times as much and supplies even a heavy user for a week or more, while for a regular smoker a pack of cigarettes lasts less than a day. There are about a million daily marijuana users between 21 and 25 with annual incomes below $20,000. How many of them would turn to cannabis reselling—buying from a licensed store and then selling it to the underage—to help pay for their own use? 

Of course, there are ways to control diversion, but they're difficult and costly. Informal cannabis transactions are harder to detect because they're usually executed discreetly: 80 percent indoors, and a similar percentage among friends or family. How comfortable should we be handing out severe punishments for supplying marijuana to underage users when the suppliers are themselves teenagers?

During the transition from illegal to legal marijuana markets, strictly illegal growers and sellers will be available as a back-up source of supply for underage users if leakage from the legal market is stopped. About a quarter of the $40 billion annual cannabis market involves sales to minors; that's a big chunk of revenue to leave in strictly illegal hands after legalization.

Given that minors will have access one way or another, it's probably safer that they get tested and labeled material from low-level and poorly-organized lawbreakers—the 22-year-old looming outside the dispensary, or maybe their friend's older brother—than to have them continue to be supplied by illegal growing organizations.

Overall, then, while we should try to erect barriers against underage purchase, we should also expect those barriers to leak.

So the key to preventing an upsurge in youth access with marijuana legalization is the same as the key to preventing an upsurge in substance use disorder among adults: keep the prices high. With production costs likely to plummet, that will require either very high taxes—based on THC content rather than on purchase price, as in Colorado or Washington, or on the weight of the plant material, as recently passed in Oregon—or tight production quotas.

You didn't really think this was going to be easy, did you?

Mark Kleiman is Professor of Public Policy at the UCLA Luskin School of Public Affairs. Steven Davenport is a graduate student at the Heinz School of Public Policy and Management at Carnegie Mellon University. Through BOTEC Analysis Corporation, they provided advice to the Washington State Liquor Control Board on the implementation of Washington's legal cannabis market.

The Top Ten Worst Beatles Songs

$
0
0

[body_image width='1024' height='723' path='images/content-images/2014/11/12/' crop='images/content-images-crops/2014/11/12/' filename='the-top-10-worst-beatles-songs-body-image-1415816892.jpg' id='3452']

Photo via ​Wikicommons

I've always despised the Beatles. They are the Backstreet Boys of the early 60s who decided to do drugs and become artists. It's like if one of the New Kids put out a shoegaze album. And I've given their music plenty of chances over the years. I can't count the number of times I've sat down with Abbey Road and tried to convince myself it's the masterpiece everyone claims it is. I've looked inward, asked myself if there's something wrong with me. Am I dead inside? But the answer I come up with is always the same: I am alive and the Beatles suck ass.

Some of my favorite music comes from bands I hated at first, but in the case of the Fab Four, the more I tried, the more each song somehow became even more cheesy and terrible. When I sat down to make this list of the Beatles songs that barf the hardest, I realized that I could have made a top 30, or top 100. 

Think of this as an opening of a discussion—the inauguration of a Hall of Anguish in the Rock 'n' Roll Hall of Fame. For a complete list of the worst songs by the Beatles, gather their discography into one long queue and press play.

[youtube src='//www.youtube.com/embed/Bj1AesMfIf8?rel=0' width='640' height='480']

10. "Here Comes the Sun"

The introduction melody to this song reminds me of waking up in a coffee commercial. A young man opens his eyes, stretches, puts on his slippers, and comes downstairs to find a steaming cup of cocoa, made by a magic elf. He laughs and shrugs at no one. He takes the cup and goes to stand at the window, sipping gently, watching robins frolic in the snow. For some reason, it is Christmas. It's always Christmas in Beatleland to me, because if Jesus existed and came down to earth he would probably listen to cheeky pop-dad bullshit like the Beatles. 

If you aren't getting your hair combed by an old man while drinking hot cocoa in your PJs when you listen to this song you aren't doing it right, and therefore I hate this song.

[youtube src='//www.youtube.com/embed/XW4-1IU9ycM?rel=0' width='640' height='480']

9. "Please Please Me"

WHY DOES THIS SONG SOUND LIKE IT IS CHRISTMAS AGAIN? Sorry, I didn't mean to type-yell. For some reason, within seconds of hearing most any Beatles song my blood goes cold and my skin starts screaming. In this case, it's because of the horrible harmonica at the beginning, which sounds like someone made an instrument out of a malfunctioning hard drive. 

Then come the lyrics about hanging out with "my girl." This whole song is an endless, lyrical spray of nursery rhyme emotion, patriarchal babbling, and rock 'n' roll turrets outbursts like "Come on, Come on, Come on!" 

Why does this guy's "girl" have to please him like he pleases her? Are the Beatles lyrics the origins of the date rape mindset? I vote yes.

[youtube src='//www.youtube.com/embed/BrxZhWCAuQw?rel=0' width='640' height='480']

8. "Blackbird"

This would be a great track to be buried alive to. The song is a little lullaby, though for some reason there's a guy tapping a little hammer against a wood block in the background. He's singing about a bird. How Portlandia.I guess the Beatles did influence the future. Thank you for including the sample of the bird chirping so at least there's something to distract me from the rest.

[youtube src='//www.youtube.com/embed/bS6B8zC2CNI?rel=0' width='640' height='480']

7. "Good Day Sunshine"

The first nine seconds of this song are tolerable because it's just a steady drum beat and piano pounding. I wish it'd stayed that way, but then the singing starts, and I can't help but think of hippies sharing loaves of bread with one another in large grass fields while listening to iPods.  There's something so Apple commercial whenever the Beatles do vocal harmonies. 

It's not that I can't get down with the overly optimistic and good-natured theme of a song about having a good day, it's that hearing people singing about having a good day usually makes me have a bad day.

[youtube src='//www.youtube.com/embed/VMxyK9azXR4?rel=0' width='640' height='480']

6. "Ticket to Ride"

I've always really hated any song that talks in third person, with lyrics like "he does what he needs / because he needs to / because he's a drifter" or something. That's not what this song says, but it might as well—it's just as hokey and makes just as little actual sense. 

Nonsensical lyrics are great when they are actually nonsensical, but lyrics that pretend to tell a story when they are actually just repeating themselves are the aural equivalent of a blowjob without anybody actually ejaculating.

[youtube src='//www.youtube.com/embed/mW6G3nh5S3I?rel=0' width='640' height='480']

5. "I Want You (She's So Heavy)"

I know it isn't fair to hold an era's slang against an artist, but I can't help wishing the subtitle of this song meant it was a love song for a big girl. In reality, it just means—again—that bro wants to do sex with a smoking hot chick. Surprise! 

The guitar line that opens this song sounds like what dozens of my friends in high school would play while trying to figure out some Smashing Pumpkins song. That could be cool or interesting in an ironic way, until the verse arrives and J-Lenny starts singing with all the vitality of your dad's favorite bar band. 

Sorry, I just don't believe the faux-earnestness in rock lyrics like "I want you" in any context. Saying "John was a genius, this was a commentary," doesn't change the fact that the song sounds like Creedence Clearwater Revival performed by deaf middle schoolers. Actually, that would be better than this song.

[youtube src='//www.youtube.com/embed/3cDG630-YGI?rel=0' width='640' height='480']

4. "Yellow Submarine"

Of all the Beatles songs I don't like (a.k.a. all), this one stands out for being so bad it's almost good. "Yellow Submarine" is one that even a lot of massive Beatles fans hate for its childish goober sing-song style. That makes me want to like it just on principle—the enemy of your enemy is your friend, right? 

But no, this track has one of the most obnoxious choruses of all time. It's the kind of chant I imagine they make child molesters sing in order to get supper delivered to their cell. Probably what most people don't like about this one is that who the fuck knows what it means. This could be a mark in its favor, if only it didn't sound like one of the Munchkins' work songs. "Yellow Submarine" should either become our national anthem or be deleted forever.

[youtube src='//www.youtube.com/embed/EDtK7xUIDxk?rel=0' width='640' height='360']

3. "The Fool on the Hill"

What happens when a heartthrob boy band does a shitload of drugs and become hippies? Poop on tape. This song has a kazoo solo, right? I'm pretty sure that this is what horses hear when they are killed.

[youtube src='//www.youtube.com/embed/d05rcD_hoQo?rel=0' width='640' height='480']

2. "Let It Be"

As much as I could say about this, I will instead defer to a comment left on the song's YouTube page by user Ninjastyle124:

"Da fact dat all kindsa muthafuckin books still name tha Beatlez 'the top billin or most dope or most influential' rock crew eva only drops some lyrics ta you how tha fuck far rock noize still is from becomin a straight-up art. Jazz muthafuckas have long recognized dat tha top billin jazz musical muthafuckaz of all times is Dude Ellington n' Jizzy Coltrane, whoz ass was not da most thugged-out hyped or richest or dopest sellaz of they times, let ridin' solo of all times. Classical muthafuckas rank tha highly controversial Beethoven over old-ass musical muthafuckas whoz ass was highly ghettofab up in courts round Europe. Rock muthafuckas is still blinded by commercial success: tha Beatlez sold mo' than any suckas (not true, by tha way), therefore they must done been tha top billin. Jazz muthafuckas grow up listenin ta a shitload of jazz noize of tha past, old-ass muthafuckas grow up listenin ta a shitload of old-ass noize of tha past. Rock muthafuckas is often straight-up all salty ta tha rock noize of tha past, they barely know tha dopest sellers. No wonder they is ghon be thinkin dat tha Beatlez did anythang worth of bein saved. Y'all KNOW dat shit, muthafucka!"

[youtube src='//www.youtube.com/embed/eDdI7GhZSQA?rel=0' width='640' height='480']

1. "Hey Jude"

No non-instrumental song ever should be more than seven minutes long unless it is black metal. This fact is even more true when half of the words are in do-do-wah-wah language. Even if this song were one minute long, I would still prefer to listen to a chorus of sickly babies crying on a plane without AC in Arizona. 

Hate-follow Blake on ​Twitter.

Viewing all 38002 articles
Browse latest View live




Latest Images