Quantcast
Channel: VICE CA
Viewing all 38002 articles
Browse latest View live

Why True-Crime Fans Are Still So Obsessed with the Gottis

$
0
0

Almost 16 years after his 2002 death due to complications caused by throat cancer, John Gotti remains a Mafia icon. From Growing Up Gotti in the mid 2000s to the upcoming John Travolta biopic to A&E’s Gotti: Godfather and Son docu-series, which premieres May 8 at the IFC Center in New York City, true-crime fans simply can’t get enough of the real-life godfather.

“Anything that has to do with Gotti or his family or his associates will be consumed like a mound of coke on Scarface’s desk,” Christian Cipollini, author of Murder Inc., says. “Just when you think the world’s had its fill, the interest, hype, and consumerism skyrockets again.” Credit goes to Gotti's particular charm and panache; his outsized personality and equally imposing figure, paired with the government's very-public efforts toward nailing him, made him a modern-day Billy the Kid.

“American culture has always been fascinated with the outlaw character,” Richard Stratton, the writer/director of Gotti: Godfather and Son, explains. “When you're a criminal, when you're a wise guy, the power of just taking a gun and walking in, holding somebody up, shaking them down, doing something illegal, and making lots of money, holds a kind of fascination for people who would never themselves want to do something like that.”

In 2009, Stratton was contracted by Playboy Magazine to cover Gotti's son, John Gotti Jr.’s fourth racketeering trial in New York City. After racking up three hung juries in federal court, pretty much unheard of in criminal proceedings, the US Attorney’s office was determined to get a conviction. Gotti Jr. stuck to his withdrawal defense, maintaining his assertion that he left the life of crime. Stratton had his doubts, but during the course of the trial, got to know the family, including Junior's mother, Victoria DiGiorgio, and brother, Peter. But he didn't get to know Junior himself, then 45, until after the trial. During the proceedings, Stratton kept hearing the government mention a 1999 recording of the last visit between John and Junior. (The senior Gotti was such a high-priority prisoner in the Federal Bureau of Prisons that every visit he had was videotaped.)

“This was a visit between the father and son, the last time they would see each other,” Stratton says. “Senior was in Springfield, Missouri, at the medical facility, dying of throat cancer, and Junior had gone to him to ask his permission to leave the mob, to quit, and focus on his blood family—his wife and kids—and leave the Gambino crime family.”

Without the 90-minute tape of the meeting, Stratton says, he doesn’t think he’d have the story that he does in Gotti: Godfather and Son. It's the ultimate father-son confrontation where the father is just lording it over the son and saying, "This is who I am. This is everything I stand for.” The father is just who he is—defiant to the end.

Gotti's dying, but he's like, "Listen, John, they could accuse me of robbing a church, and I could have the steeple sticking out of my ass. I'm still going to deny it. You've got to be a man, John. Where's your dignity? Where's your manhood?” But then there's a moment where it changes and Gotti Sr. goes from being boss of the Gambino crime family to being a father.

“I thought, Oh my God. This is Shakespeare. This is Hamlet meets Julius Cesar. This is 'to be or not to be a gangster,'” Stratton says. “Gotti Sr. looks at his son and says, ‘You're your own man, John.’ That was how it ended, with Gotti Sr. saying, ‘Take the plea, but they'll never leave you alone.’” And lo and behold, in 1999 Junior took the plea, did six and a half years in the feds—much of it at FCI Ray Brook—and just weeks before he was about to be released, the feds indicted him again.

“I think that fans are obsessed with the Gotti name because of who John Gotti Sr. was,” Stratton says. “When he walked into a room, all eyes were on that man. There was just something about him. He was glamorous. He had movie-star good looks, but he was also very outgoing, friendly, and funny. He was constantly telling jokes, but he was very charismatic.”

Stratton speaks from personal experience. He met Gotti Sr. at Metropolitan Correctional Center New York in the late 80s while doing his own bid for smuggling tons of weed. He was working as a clerk in the Nine South unit when Gotti was ushered over from Nine North, the maximum-security lockdown unit, to talk to some of his guys before he was bailed out. According to Stratton, in prison, Gotti got preferential treatment. His legend outsized among both criminals and law enforcement.

“We used to call it the Criminal Hilton,” Stratton says. “Anybody who's ever met John Sr. never forgets. He was what he was. He was a gangster, but he was no hypocrite. He played that role, he played it to the hilt, and he was defiant to the end. He loved the life. He loved being that guy, and he lived up to it. When he walked into a restaurant, he'd hand out $100 bills to everybody on the way to his table. He was that kind of guy.”

Courtroom sketch of John Gotti Sr. courtesy of A&E Network

In the 1970s, The Godfather trilogy solidified the mythology of the Mob-as-secret society, and showed the public what it meant to be part of an organization that defied the norms and government of this country. When Gotti usurped the Gambino crime family throne in the 1980s, he epitomized the type of gangster who succeeded by breaking all the rules. The flashy, unforgiving, and high-profile mobster has been a legend ever since.

“He represents the rebellious lawbreaker that secretly resides in all of us,” Louis Ferrante, a former mobster and host of Inside the Gangsters’ Code, tells VICE. Ferrante served nearly a decade in jail for running a heist crew within the Gambino family, got out, and started writing books. He left the mob without turning on his comrades.

That's unlike, of course, Sammy “The Bull” Gravano, who altered the underworld landscape forever by ratting on the Teflon Don. Notwithstanding the media frenzy already created by Gotti’s notoriety, Gravano’s role in the larger drama as a Judas figure further put the clandestine Mafia underworld culture on blast. These days, it’s almost commonplace to take a plea deal, and wise guys are becoming informants with a seemingly higher frequency.

“I’m not sure why anyone would truly want to be the boss of a family,” Cipollini says. “Considering how you essentially become the most recognized by colleagues and cops alike, not to mention the risk of being number one target for enemy conspirators.”

John Gotti, Jr. Photo courtesy of A&E Network

That’s what happened to Gotti Jr. when his dad went away for life and he subsequently assumed the mantle. The feds were determined to bring him down—he had to deal with everything from keeping the cops at bay to smoothing over feuds to protecting his own family. It was a volatile time for the young mobster, who had been groomed to take over the family, but was looking for a way out that didn’t involve Witsec, the Federal Witness Protection Program.

Today, the Gotti name lives on, casting a long shadow over the son and remaining Gotti family members. Walking away from the criminal enterprise his father stood for proved no easy task for Junior.

“I fought three separate cases at once,” Ferrante tells VICE. “And unless people have faced life sentences and endured seemingly endless years in court as both John and I have, they cannot understand the pressure to walk away from that world.

“In a strange way, Junior lived up to his father's sense of honor by leaving the life in silence after assessing all of the mob's degenerative issues," Ferrante continues. "No easy thing to do as anyone can see by simply counting the increasing number of snitches who choose a different way out.” Omertà—the Mafia code of silence—doesn’t hold the same weight it once did.

“The legacy of John Jr. is that you can be your own man,” says Stratton. “You don't have to be who your father wanted you to be. You can be brave and bold and make a statement about who you as a person are. As a result of his decision, other guys have walked away from it, too. Now, John could've done just the opposite. He could've embraced it and stayed the boss. Money, power, all of that, but he chose not to. He chose his blood family—his wife and children—over the Gambino crime family.”

On some levels, it's just as intriguing, if not more so, than the criminal exploits of the father.

Gotti: Godfather and Son premieres May 8 at the IFC Center, and on A&E on June 9, 2018.

Sign up for our newsletter to get the best of VICE delivered to your inbox daily.

Follow Seth Ferranti on Twitter.

This article originally appeared on VICE US.


'The Simpsons' Apu Response Was 'Petty and Sad,' Hari Kondabolu Says

$
0
0

The Problem with Apu filmmaker Hari Kondabolu has been pretty active on Twitter following The Simpsons' recent weak-ass attempt to address the character's controversy. But on Tuesday, the comedian opened up to the Daily Beast about the show's treatment of the Kwik-E-Mart manager, saying the whole thing was "petty and sad," signaling "the downfall of a show I loved for so long."

"It was a punch to the gut," Kondabolu told the Daily Beast. "And the punch to the gut was not to the Indian American part of me, oddly enough, it was to the Simpsons fan part. You just sacrificed Lisa? Lisa's me, man."

He added, "The level of white fragility is kind of shocking. Like, really? Some kid makes a movie on a cable network and you’re the biggest comedy of all time, and you get criticized really for the first time ever and you can’t handle it? We get made fun of three decades and I get this film out and you’ve been king for three decades and one criticism and you fold."

Last month, The Simpsons finally acknowledged the long-standing criticism that Apu, the heavily-accented South Asian character voiced by Hank Azaria—a white dude—was little more than a caricature playing on racist stereotypes. Unfortunately, that mediocre episode mostly just involved Lisa Simpson shrugging off the whole issue: "Something that started decades ago and was applauded and inoffensive is now politically incorrect," Lisa says directly to the audience. "What can you do?"

After the episode aired, Simpsons creator Matt Groening echoed the show's sentiments, dismissing the controversy as people who "love to pretend they’re offended" and refusing to discuss the issue further. "We'll let the show speak for itself," he told USA Today.

"It was really confusing, because I had read all these great things about Matt Groening, that he would keep notes in the margins of scripts like, 'That’s mean-spirited, that’s not what the show is about, we’re not doing that. We’re not making fun of people that way,'" Kondabolu said. He added, "It’s a response that made me think he didn’t see the film. The Simpsons’ writers’ response is a response of people who didn’t see the film."

The only member of The Simpsons' cast and crew who seemed to actually sympathize with Kondabolu's documentary and actively engage with the criticism was Azaria himself, who recently offered to "step aside" and hand the role of Apu off to someone else, if necessary. And while Kondabolu has thanked Azaria for his comments, he said it's probably "too late" for that.

"I don’t think you do a different voice, what’s the point? The show is 29 years old. What good does that do? The thing that would benefit all parties would be for the show to be more creative," he told the Daily Beast.

For now, at least, it doesn't seem like anyone in The Simpsons' writers' room is particularly willing to find a more creative solution—but some outside of it, like producer Adi Shankar, are actively looking at ways to address the problem with Apu, once and for all.

Sign up for our newsletter to get the best of VICE delivered to your inbox daily.

Follow VICE on Twitter.

This article originally appeared on VICE US.

The Six Stages of Learning Grimes Is Dating Elon Musk

$
0
0

I realize this may ruin my chances to get evacuated to Mars if/when humans destroy the Earth, but I don’t like Elon Musk very much. On no grounds other than my innate distrust of rich, white Silicon Valley “disrupters,” he’s always given me Batman villain-in-waiting vibes (and his embrace of union-busing tactics at his car factories doesn't do him any favors).

Which is why, when I learned on Monday that he’s dating Claire Boucher, a.k.a. Grimes, I felt totally betrayed—in my mind, she’s a bastion of smart feminism, one of the good ones. The first time I saw her perform, I filled an iCloud note with slightly stoned ruminations about how cool she looked up there, flanked by fierce female backup dancers dressed like kawaii monster girls. Even her embrace of mainstream pop came off as a sort of fame-based thought experiment. Shouldn’t someone so intelligent be impervious to the charms of a billionaire who strapped a Tesla to a rocket ship for funsies? Is she really as susceptible to social media courtship as I was at 22, when I let a stupid boy who had really “good” taste in music seduce me on Spotify?

As we all come to terms with Grimes and Elon Musk's merger, let's go through the six stages of learning about the relationship together:

1. Shock

Someone posted a link to the Page Six article announcing they’re “quietly dating” in Slack, and I’m screaming. This may be the most incongruous couple of all time. What does she see in him? Isn’t Elon like 46 years old? How the heck did they meet? And they’re going to the Met Gala together? How long has this been going on??

2. Denial

Hold on, Page Six has no idea what they’re talking about. They refer to Boucher as “hip musician Grimes” which makes them sound like old fuddy-duddies, so clearly they’re not a reputable publication. And who is this "source" for this bizarre meet-cute?

A source tells us the pair met around a month ago online, of course, through a joke Musk had planned to tweet but discovered Grimes had already made, dealing with the complications of artificial intelligence.

I’m not buying it. Fake news!

3. Anger

Oh my God, does this mean Elon googles all his jokes before he tweets them? And since he tweeted about the video for “Venus Fly,” a song from 2015, in March of 2018, does this mean he’d never heard of Grimes before googling his punny AI joke? I’m picturing Elon tooling around California in his souped-up Tesla blasting Grimes’s discography and later Wikipedia-ing everything about her and thinking to himself, “Wow, she’s pretty hot.” BARF.

And here’s another thing: when Elon googled his super-intellectual joke and found out a much smarter woman had already made it three years earlier, he wasn’t humbled? He decided to slide into her DMs instead of getting her number from a friend and asking her out to coffee or taking her for a ride in his helicopter or something? Are men honestly this emotionally stunted, that they can be wildly rich and successful and still inclined to flirt in the least vulnerable way possible—by tweeting at a woman? This feels like the 2018 equivalent of throwing rocks at girls on the playground. Or poking someone on Facebook.



4. Bargaining

Maybe Grimes is smarter than we all thought. Maybe she has some celebrity insider information about the state of our planet, and she’s just doing this for the guaranteed ticket to Mars. She can't... like him, right? Right?

5. Grief

Or maybe I was wrong about Grimes being this icon of wokeness. Maybe she’s just human, like the rest of us and bowled over by Elon’s outsize fame and influence. Maybe she’s in it for the unfathomable riches. Maybe she wants to be the Poison Ivy to his Mr. Freeze.

Now I’m scrolling through Elon’s Twitter feed, trying to find the OG “Rococo Basilisk” banter, but I’m getting distracted by the sheer breadth of things the dude seems to be working on. He’s over here tweeting about Willy Wonka cosplay and starting a candy company with Warren Buffet. And building cyborg dragons. And selling flamethrowers. And starting an intergalactic media company called Thud! staffed by former Onion writers. And digging tunnels for super fast car-trains. And launching more rockets than NASA or Pyongyang. I realize a lot of these are jokes. But I'm not sure which ones.

6. Acceptance

Shoot, the flamethrower looks pretty cool. Dangerous, yes. But cool. I could see how Grimes might see him goofing off with a flamethrower on Instagram and be like, “Aw, look at this quirky billionaire joking about torching zombies!”

Aside from having the same sense of humor, he seems to appreciate her music. And they’re both into nerd culture, like anime and sci-fi. Maybe Grimes actually believes in the work he’s doing. I mean, making renewable energy more accessible is a noble endeavor, any way you slice it. Also Grimes hates flying and doesn’t really drive, so I could see her being very pro-tunnel transit.

Shoot… Grimes and Elon Musk are starting to seem like a pretty good match. I still think Boucher looks a little shocked that they’re an item (same, girl) in all their photos together, but I’m beginning to make peace with it. Grimes, Elon—you have my blessing. You're welcome.

Sign up for our newsletter to get the best of VICE delivered to your inbox daily.

Follow Kara Weisenstein on Twitter.

This article originally appeared on VICE US.

Doug Ford’s Plan For Selling Weed Could Be Worse Than Kathleen Wynne’s

$
0
0

It looks like Ontario Progressive Conservative leader Doug Ford has changed his mind about being open to a “free market” for selling legal weed in the province.

In a provincial debate last night, Ford attacked Premier Kathleen Wynne for placing one of the province's first legal pot shops near a school.

Just after he won the PC leadership race in March, Ford implied he might favour private pot shops.

“I'm open to a free market and I'm going to consult with our caucus,” he said on CBC Radio’s Ottawa Morning at the time. “I don't believe in the government sticking their hands in our lives all the time. I believe in letting the market dictate.”

In response, Wynne called Ford’s comments “reckless” and said, “I think that a lot of parents would have concerns about cannabis being available beside candy bars in corner stores.”

Wynne is in the midst of establishing her scheme for selling recreational pot in the province via a government monopoly controlled by the LCBO. Weed will be sold in standalone shops called Ontario Cannabis Stores, with 40 opening this year, followed by another 40 in 2019, with a total of 150 by 2020. But when the two leaders discussed the issue at last night’s debate, Ford seemed to backtrack on his earlier position, noting that he too would go with an LCBO rollout.

“We don’t want cannabis sold in corner stores, we want to make sure there’s a controlled rollout. Kids’ safety is the top priority and undercutting the black market,” Wynne said.

Ford replied, “I won’t put it besides schools like you did,” a reference to the location of one of the first provincial weed stores, which was slated to be 450 metres from a local school.

Wynne responded that Ford was “going to have it in corner stores.”

“No actually I said LCBOs… it was beside a school on your watch,” he said, adding he will have “zero tolerance” for drug impaired driving.

Wynne noted that selling cannabis in a liquor store is a bad idea, while NDP leader Andrea Horwath said her party’s plan was the only one that would get rid of the criminal element in drug sales. (The NDP has been relatively quiet on weed other than to criticize the Liberals’ planned rollout as too slow to impact the black market.)

VICE reached out to the Ford campaign for clarity on his position on weed sales and whether or not he wants weed to be sold in LCBO stores or in stores controlled by the LCBO i.e. what Wynne is already doing. We have not yet heard back.

If the former is true, there are several issues with what Ford said last night.

First off, there are lots of LCBOs that are close to schools, particularly in dense urban areas—the one closest to my house is only 300 metres from the nearest high school. So Ford isn’t going to avoid the school proximity issue simply by selling weed in liquor stores.

(As a side note, unless we are worried that the province’s own employees aren’t going to be able to properly ID people and avoid selling weed to minors, is this really such a huge issue? There are a lot of schools in Toronto, so requiring a 450 metre buffer is going to be quite a challenge. Vancouver pot shops only need to be 300 metres from schools.)

Secondly, Wynne is right that selling weed in liquor stores is considered a bad idea by health officials. This is because mixing weed and liquor can make a person extremely intoxicated, and is especially dangerous when it comes to driving. And selling weed in liquor stores could encourage people who may otherwise not be interested to try it. Flipping that last point on its head, there are people who use cannabis instead of other substances, and requiring them to go into a liquor store to purchase weed seems unfair and unwise.

There’s only a few more weeks until Ontario’s provincial election, but when it comes to selling weed it seems the nanny state will be intact regardless of who wins.

Follow Manisha Krishnan on Twitter.

Blue Jays’ Roberto Osuna Placed on Leave After Allegedly Assaulting a Woman

$
0
0

Toronto Police have confirmed that Roberto Osuna, the Toronto Blue Jays star closer, has been arrested and charged with one count of assault.

The assault is alleged to have taken place over night, the victim is a woman, and the 23-year-old was arrested Tuesday morning. Not much more is known about the incident and TPS is not releasing more info out of respect for the victim. In a statement the MLB said they take "all allegations of this nature very seriously."

"We are investigating the circumstances and have placed Roberto Osuna on Administrative Leave in accordance with the Joint MLB-MLBPA Domestic Violence Policy.”

Osuna is in his fourth season in the majors and has established himself as one of the top young closers in baseball. The Blue Jays, in a statement, said they supported the league's decision.

“We are aware of the incident involving Roberto and fully support the decision by the Commissioner’s Office to place him on administrative leave," it reads. "We are taking the matter extremely seriously, as the type of conduct associated with this incident is not reflective of our values as an organization. As this remains an ongoing investigation by Toronto Police, the Club will not comment further on the matter.”

In 2015, the MLB and the MLBPA came to an agreement regarding a domestic violence policy. In it the MLB Commissioner's Office will investigate allegations of domestic abuse and “decide on appropriate discipline, with no minimum or maximum penalty under the policy.”

"Players are husbands, fathers, sons and boyfriends,” said MLBPA executive director Tony Clark in 2015. “And as such want to set an example that makes clear that there is no place for domestic abuse in our society.”

A handful of star MLB players have been charged with domestic assault over the past few years. As first pointed out by Sportsnet, four MLB players—Jose Reyes, Aroldis Chapman, Jeurys Familia, and Steven Wright—all received suspensions when being charged with domestic assault under the new policy.

Reyes received 51 games, Chapman 30 games, and Wright and Familia both received 15 games. None of the players were ever found guilty of the charge.

Osuna will be appearing in court on June 18.

Follow Mack Lamoureux on Twitter

Party On, Dudes! Bill & Ted 3 Is Officially Happening

$
0
0

Four score and a quarter-century ago, two San Dimas High School stoners set forth upon a most excellent adventure in a phone booth time machine to pass History, save the world, and party on, dudes. Now, it looks like Wyld Stallyns are going to do it all again. On Tuesday, Hollywood Reporter confirmed that Keanu Reeves and Alex Winter are officially onboard to bring Bill S. Preston, Esq. and Ted "Theodore" Logan back for a brand-new Bill & Ted movie, 26 years after Bill & Ted's Bogus Journey hit theaters.

The upcoming movie, currently titled Bill & Ted Face the Music, is based on a script by the franchise's original creators, Chris Matheson and Ed Solomon. Dean Parisot, who helmed the criminally underrated Galaxy Quest, is onboard to direct. It sounds, in the immortal words of the film's heroes, most bodacious.

The sequel will reportedly pick up a few decades later, with Bill and Ted squarely in middle age and still struggling to live up to Rufus's prophecy. They have yet to write a hit song, yet to unite the world with the power of rock or whatever, and yet to usher in a glorious future full of wrap-around sunglasses and Clarence Clemons—and the pressure of that unfinished business is weighing on them.

"At 16, you're told you're going to save the world, and now you're 50, and you haven't done it," Matheson explained in an interview with People last month, before the film had officially gotten the green light. "It affects their marriages and it affects their relationships with their kids and it affects their everything. And then the future actually shows up and is like, 'You've got to do it right now.'"

"It's kind of like A Christmas Carol with Bill and Ted," Solomon said.

"We couldn’t be more excited to get the whole band back together again," Reeves and Winter said in a statement. "Chris and Ed wrote an amazing script, and with Dean at the helm, we’ve got a dream team!"

The announcement didn't say who else from the original cast is set to return, but it looks like Bill Sadler might be dusting off the board games to reprise his role as Death. No word yet on whether we'll see Station again, though. The film is still in pre-production and probably a couple years away from hitting theaters so until then, please: Be excellent to each other.

Sign up for our newsletter to get the best of VICE delivered to your inbox daily.

Follow VICE on Twitter.

This article originally appeared on VICE US.

Don’t Mistake ‘This Sounds Serious’ for a Real True Crime Podcast

$
0
0

Type “true crime” into any podcast app’s search bar and you may be faced with an uncomfortable reality: there are more recorded hours of strangers reciting serial killer Wikipedia pages than there are hours left in this year. That means you could theoretically listen to true crime podcasts every waking second of every day until 2019, and you’d still only be getting a slice of what’s already out there.

While we’ve certainly been blessed with parodies like Netflix’s American Vandal, there hasn’t been nearly enough jokes to keep up with this constant stream of earnest and terrifying crime podcasts. As someone who mainlines true crime as part of my job, I know the genre can warp one's sense of reality. (To give you an idea, I’ve recently been talked out of writing a trend story on “something sex-culty floating in the zeitgeist.”)

For some reason This Is That writers Pat Kelly and Peter Oldring seem to be on my surreal, crime-obsessed level. Along with podcast veterans Dave Shumka and Chris Kelly, as well as cast members Carly Pope, Lauren Ash and Paul F. Tompkins, the This Sounds Serious crew has blended absurd and believable in their own strange and Canadian way.

VICE caught up with Pat Kelly to talk about fooling listeners, satisfying endings, and maybe something culty in their future.

VICE: I’m curious about where you guys were coming from on this podcast. Was it an appreciation of the genre, or were you ripping on these tropes we’ve become so saturated in?
Pat Kelly: When we started jamming on the idea originally months ago, we were going to approach by fully attacking the tropes. We thought this needs to be made fun of, because there’s just so much of it. Then The Onion came out with A Very Fatal Murder, which was just a parade of jokes, basically doing all the work you’d need to do to make fun of the genre.

So we stepped back and asked ourselves: what do we like about this? We were attracted to the challenge of telling a story of a weird crime. Like, creating a story that’s a nice backdrop for odd characters, and using that structure as a backdrop for comedy. That hadn’t really been done in podcasting. As it advances, I don’t want to give too much away, but we’ll be going beyond the true crime podcasting trend, making fun of true crime television—that was such a big thing, basically what podcasting is now—and we’ll do a thing on cults, too. We’re trying to throw a bunch of things we see happening in podcasting, but our fundamental goal to tell a story that’s compelling, but also hilarious.

Do you think we’ve reached peak true crime podcast? Is the end near?
I don’t think we’ve reached the end. What has happened is we've totally revealed that it’s a type of story that is built for podcasting. The truth is, the whodunnit-kinda-thing has been around for a long time. I always equate it to 90s TV, when every channel was true crime, true crime, true crime. They're easy stories to find, so podcasters are finding them, and they don’t ever necessarily need to be closed—they're just using the dramatic device of an unsolved crime to string you along. I think the popularity of these is actually showing you what people’s taste are. A lot of people's tastes are these stories. We're hoping people who are honest-to-god true crime fans will give us a chance because they're like, I know it’s fake but I know enough of these shows, I might get a good laugh out of it.

I admit, I may have reached a personal saturation point. I feel lonely in not loving Serial or S-Town, but I still love a satisfying ending like in The Jinx. Can you tell me about your influences there?
I think The Jinx played a huge inspiration with ours, I absolutely loved it, mostly because of the complexity of the character, and this obviously looming thing that he may be guilty, which is something we were riffing on. In S-town I felt like it was less about dissecting a crime, more of a character study. We took a bit of that too—maybe it’s OK to create a character and spend eight or nine episodes with them. I think the average true crime podcast you find in whatever app—every week there’s a new one right at the top—a lot of them are kinda lazy, where they’re just reading a Wikipedia page about a murder. You’re basically getting a bedtime story. But the reason why people like them is they’re true, and there’s built-in drama. It just sucks when you get to episode ten and they say, ‘We don’t know anymore than we did in episode one, the killer’s still out there… bye!’

Given This Is That’ s history of fooling the average Canadian news consumer, do you think this one will “pass” as a real true crime story?
I think ultimately even with This Is That, we don’t necessarily set out to trick people, it’s just our own deadpan nature. It’s a similar thing, we’re not setting out to make people think it’s real, but I guarantee some portion of the listeners will reach out when all said and done, and say ‘I thought it was real up until the end.’ When you give people a story, they have something to invest in. We go out of our way to create everything, to make all that stuff, and the attention to detail make everything feel as believable as possible. So our goal is not to trick people but if we do, it means we’re doing a good job.

You’ve probably learned by now people don’t like to be fooled.
No, they don’t! (laughs) We would be just as happy if everyone knew it was fake, but if we get discovered by a few fans searching out their latest true crime binge, they might assume it’s real. Hopefully they think it’s a fun story for when I’m on the bus or whatever—they may get invested and get a good laugh out of it anyway.

Interview has been edited for length and clarity.

Follow Sarah Berman on Twitter.

The Golden State Killer Case Shows a 'Path' to Finally Catch the Zodiac

$
0
0

In early June 1963, 18-year-old Robert Domingos and 17-year-old Linda Edwards both dipped out of class at Lompoc High School for Senior Skip Day, a local tradition that came shortly before graduation. But instead of hanging with classmates, the couple went to the beach on their own.

Days later, their bullet-riddled bodies were found on a remote stretch of Gaviota Beach in Santa Barbara County. Nine years after the murders, in 1972, county police investigators attributed their murders to be the work of the so-called Zodiac Killer, even though no one appeared to have taken credit for the killings.



The serial killer who went by the notorious handle operated in the San Francisco Bay area from roughly 1968-69, and police conclusively linked him to at least the murders of five people—David Faraday, Betty Lou Jensen, Darlene Ferrin, Cecelia Shepard, and Paul Stine—although he appeared to claim 37 bodies in a cryptic letter mailed to the San Francisco Chronicle in 1974. After data from a consumer genealogy website helped nab 72-year-old Joseph James DeAngelo, who is accused of being the Golden State Killer, police are hoping the same method can identify one of America's most notorious serial killers after 50 years. (The renewed push for Zodiac DNA began months ago, before the arrest of DeAngelo, Vallejo Police Detective told the Associated Press.)

Tom Voigt, an amateur sleuth based in Portland, has investigated—so much as any lay citizen can—the Zodiac case for the last 20 years, as catalogued on his website, zodiackiller.com. The odd quest has essentially become Voigt’s day job—he accepts donations through his website—and the 51-year-old has described receiving exclusive access to police evidence vaults and maintaining a network of confidential sources in the law enforcement community. One of those sources, he said, even gave him never-before-seen autopsy photos of Domingos and Edwards.

While Voigt hasn’t received access to evidence maintained by the Santa Barbara County Sheriff’s Office, he told me late Monday it’s time they released more information to the public—or else closed the door for good on the killer ever being brought to justice. We chatted at length about why an outsider like him is worth hearing on a case as serious as this one, and where this saga goes from here.

VICE: Numerous law enforcement agencies have worked on this since the Zodiac emerged decades ago. Why should people trust you or your website as an authoritative source for information on such a case?
Tom Voigt:
Well, it was about six months after launching that America's Most Wanted and John Walsh featured my site. I was able to get into the San Francisco Police Department evidence room, I was able to get into the Napa County Sheriff's Department evidence room, and I got access to materials that nobody else have ever been given access to. My knowledge of everything Zodiac behind the scenes, stuff that no one else has ever seen, is something that I think is displayed throughout zodiackiller.com. You're going to see information from all the jurisdictions that no one's ever seen before. And just most recently in September, I don't know if you saw that update, but I was invited down by the Vallejo Police Department to help them with their Zodiac evidence. That's ultimately what people want to know.

Given your prolonged exposure to the saga, what’s your sense of what it would take to catch the Zodiac Killer at this point?
The only thing that hurts cold cases is when it's a police department that is involved and they have limited funding. A typical city police department is always struggling with their budgets and cold cases are expensive to solve because often times they're going to involve forensic testing and so forth to try to find a DNA match of the culprit. They're focused on current crime. That's where all their resources have to go. They just really don't have much manpower or budget left to try to solve 40- or 50-year-old cases that were cold within three days. So it's considered a long-shot and they're gambling with taxpayer money.

If the state of California would get behind the Zodiac case like they did with the Golden State Killer and put state money into the investigation, they could collect whatever evidence that they don't already have from San Francisco and Vallejo, they can test it all, get a full DNA profile with the state crime lab and then just copy the formula that was used to catch the Golden State Killer suspect. There's a proven formula. There's a path—before there was no path through the wilderness. Now there's a path that's been laid out. The hard part's over.

About the DNA sample: When I last talked to you, you said the sample that has made the press recently was collected on top of a stamp on a letter apparently sent from the Zodiac, meaning it could be basically anybody's. Are you skeptical that the police have a viable DNA sample?
They don't have a viable DNA sample. Let me clarify: The DNA from 2002 was taken from the top of the stamp and some people have a hard time understanding why DNA would have been collected outside and not underneath. There wasn't [enough] underneath to pull even a partial profile. The outside of the Zodiac stamp is just as much evidence as the inside. And the job of Cydne Holt, her job [as featured on an ABC News story] was to try to get DNA from the Zodiac evidence that was given to her and that is what she did. She tested all of the evidence inside and out and that's what she should've done. And it just turns out that the only DNA she could get was only a partial profile [and] just happened to be from the outside of the stamp.

Now, that doesn't automatically mean it's the mailman's. I think that once Zodiac dropped that letter in the mailbox, not more than ten or 15 people would've touched it over time until it was determined to be evidence and sealed properly. So, there's a one-in-ten or one-in-fifteen chance that that DNA could be the Zodiac's, but it's still only a partial profile. So, luckily Detective Terry Poyser of the Vallejo Police Department submitted some evidence, the Zodiac letters, to a lab sometime ago and it's expected that the results will be back [as soon as] next month.

Do you really think the Zodiac Killer is still alive?
Well, I hope the Zodiac is still alive because then he can be prosecuted. I used to say that the odds were that he was dead, but it used to be so funny because when I started researching the Zodiac case I read a lot of other types of books about other cases and it was always said by the FBI, their behavioral experts and profilers, oh, you know, serial killers can't stop on their own—they keep going and they keep going. So if a series of murders stopped, it's because the guy got caught for another crime, unrelated. Or because he died or he's in a mental hospital—they can't stop on their own. Oh boy, did that turn out to be bullshit. The Green River Killer stopped on his own, Gary Ridgway, and he was eventually caught decades later. The same with Dennis Rader, the BTK Strangler, and now you have another example with the Golden State Killer suspect DeAngelo. If he's the guy, apparently he stopped a long time ago.

Why is this case still important and worthy of, as you note, finite resources? It's been 50 years.
The worst of the worst always have to be pursued until they're caught. The Zodiac is the last one. His last claim was he killed 37 people. I don't know if he really killed 37 people but, you know, he sure killed five. And he deserves to be apprehended, if possible, and prosecuted for those crimes. And that's why people are still interested. It's always been about the victims.

Is there any stuff that you saw in the evidence room that you didn't publish on your website?
I ended up seeing two or three written items that I felt like definitely could've been from the Zodiac. I don't know if they were from the Zodiac but they could be and I want to get another shot at them—I want to see them again. I do know for sure that there were some items in those boxes that should have been considered evidence. There's a lot of material to go through.

The funny thing is, that a lot of what Vallejo has in those kook—I call them kook boxes because a lot of stuff is just kooky, sent by people who think they know who the Zodiac is or think they've solved the code. I've been sent stuff by the same people. I'd open a package and it would be dirty Q-tips in a Ziplock bag. Someone thinks they know who the Zodiac is and they got his dirty Q-tips so that the DNA—so that they can prove he's the Zodiac and they sent it to me for some reason.

You mentioned in your post that you saw some newer suspects that weren't previously or publicly mentioned.
Virtually everything in those boxes was all sent by people who figured they knew who the Zodiac was or figured they solved one of the cyphers. But I get emails multiple times a day from people who think they know who the Zodiac is. I didn't really waste too much time reading that stuff when I was in Vallejo because I'm already used to it and 99 percent of what I get sent about possible suspects is just garbage. People tend to want to be right—they want their neighbor or their dad or their grandpa or their elementary school teacher [to be] the Zodiac. They just jump to conclusions. A lot of the reasoning behind why someone things they know who the Zodiac is just not substantial at all. And also, a lot of people, their knowledge about the Zodiac is limited to a paperback book that they read 30 years ago, which is inaccurate, or an inaccurate movie, or an inaccurate TV recreation. They're basing why they think who they know the Zodiac is on falsehoods. I'm very quick to spot that stuff because I've been dealing with that for so long. It's very rare when I see something about a suspect that's really very compelling at all.

Going back to the autopsy photos of Robert Domingos and Linda Edwards, you obtained these from a source inside the Santa Barbara County Sheriff's Office?
That's correct and I've had that information for awhile now. I don't like to post photos like that unless I think there's something that might benefit the case overall. If I don't see any real possibility that it can benefit the case in the long run, which ultimately is to solve the case, then I don't really want to be known as someone who posts gruesome photos. So I've always tried to avoid it. But in the case of Domingos and Edwards, it's the 55th anniversary coming up. I don't know what the Santa Barbara County Sheriff's Office is doing, but it's been 55 fucking years. Do something—anything.

This interview has been lightly edited for length and clarity.

Sign up for our newsletter to get the best of VICE delivered to your inbox daily.

Follow Dave Minsky on Twitter.

This article originally appeared on VICE US.


Who Is Lil Tay and Are We OK with the Internet Hating Her?

$
0
0

Sitting in the driver’s seat of a blue sports car as an engine revs in the background, Lil Tay counts a healthy stack of American cash while licking her lips. Suddenly, she hops out, slams the door, and exclaims while pointing off camera, “Bitch, I just bought a Lamborghini! Y’all bitches can’t afford this shit, OK? I’m only nine years old, but I’m the youngest flexer of the century!”

The apparent nine-year-old girl with partially bleached shoulder-length hair continues her monologue as YouTuber Jake Paul and her throw a purported $500,000 on the floor of a garage. “Y’all be hating on me because y’all broke and jealous!” Tay says before turning away from the camera and kicking the cash on the floor with her clean white sneakers.

The Instagram video described above has over 4 million views.

Over the past month, Lil Tay’s profile has grown exponentially online. She and her supposed mother were the subject of a recent Babe.net investigation that revealed a detail we at VICE Canada continuously get too excited about: Despite her posts often being tagged in Hollywood and her affinity for blue hundreds, Lil Tay may be secretly Canadian.

And her mother? Babe.net claims to have identified her in one of Lil Tay’s videos: In quintessential Vancouverite style, she’s reportedly a real estate agent.

Lil Tay, whose tagline is “youngest flexer of the century,” exhaustively claims over and over to be nine years old, to have luxury vehicles, and to wear designer clothing. She’s been seen in Instagram posts with rappers Chief Keef and Lil Pump; her IG bio claims she is getting a “GUCCI GANG FACE TATT @ 10 MILL.” She talks about “moving bricks,” swears often and with vigor, and, we regret to inform you, has used the N word. (Side note: Lil Tay said in a December 2017 YouTube video “Bitch, I’m partially black. Y’all, like, you don’t even know anything about me, so why you just making assumptions?”)

Tay’s existence online and her followers—1.6 million on Instagram, over 143,000 on YouTube—may just be a harbinger of the new reality of child stardom. Though child stars are nothing new, this particular new-era brand of them brings up uncomfortable questions.

Lil Tay’s appeal lies in juxtaposition: a child doing and saying outrageous things that society would not expect said child to say and do. But her appeal also lies, in part, in hatred.

I’m still haunted from the “interview” I had with another child star, Danielle Bregoli, aka "Cash Me Ousside” Girl. Memes of Bregoli, who was 13 at the time, were eagerly shared at the onset of her fame following a Dr. Phil episode. But once the collective internet sober thought kicked in, questions about cultural appropriation were unavoidable. Amidst all of this, Bregoli rebranded to “Bhad Bhabie” and started her career as a rapper. In Fader, an interviewer asked Bregoli about why she thinks people hate on her so much: “People are going to hit that dislike button, but there are more people who are going to hit that like button, that’s all that matters to me,” she said.

As it happens, Lil Tay appears to have beef with Bregoli. The two, along with another Instagram-famous youth, Woah Vicky, can be seen getting into an altercation in an April 18 video posted to Tay’s Instagram. The caption reads: “Really be talkin all that but paid and brought 2 body guards to fight 😂😂 Big L You double my age but the same height 😂😂"

If Tay’s Instagram comments are any indication, she has already been facing the wrath of online hatred as well.

“This is why parents these days need to abort,” one commenter says on the video of Tay and Bregoli. In a video of Tay standing on a balcony in Beverly Hills, the comments section is flooded with people suggesting she should fall off the balcony or be pushed off of it. Some simply say “jump.”

In her most recent Instagram video, Tay seems to egg the haters on, insulting them for being “grown-ass men” hating on her. The caption in part, says, “Like this if you hate Lil Tay.”

“Stop giving her attention, this is why she gets so much clout. If you hate her so much just ignore her,” one commenter suggests.

Hate undoubtedly can be part of the equation for fame, though here it seems integral to the appeal rather than being background noise. And when the subject of said hatred is a supposed elementary-aged child, are we really OK with accepting this as a form of entertainment?

Unlike Bregoli, who rose to fame after a meme-able appearance on Dr Phil, Lil Tay appears, at least on the surface, more homegrown. That said, mingling on-camera with other influencers like Jake Paul and Woah Vicky, as well as supposed “fights” with Bregoli and YouTuber RiceGum, have served to propel Tay’s fame.

Lil Tay delivered a teary-eyed message to her haters while admitting to the RiceGum "beef" being fake, a response apparently brought on by people reporting her videos. “I’m trying to accomplish my dreams—if you don’t like that, just block me,” she says in the video.

Like Bregoli, Lil Tay also apparently has ambitions in the music industry. In an interview with Jezebel, Alex Goller Gelbard (aka Loyalty G.), who is described as working with Lil Tay (but, apparently, not as her manager), discloses “music plans” for the girl:

“Tay currently does have music plans in development… We are not yet ready to comment publicly on any deals or offers that have been received or confirmed,” he told Jezebel. “There are records Tay has put together that have not yet been released, however full projects are in planning and developmental stages.”

You can listen to a song of Lil Tay’s below, “Money Way.” (For what it’s worth, Bhad Bhabie’s “Gucci Flip Flops” autoplayed right after I watched this.)

It’s possible these young shit-starters are simply testing out a new formula for music industry stardom. But if this is in fact now the reality of how some children get famous, should we consider the ethics of continuing to support this, hatred included? How can we possibly know what impact this will have as these kids become adults?

Considering Lil Tay apparently won’t even start high school for another half decade, we won’t have satisfying answers to these questions anytime soon.

I Dressed Like Keanu Reeves for a Week and Became a Living Meme

$
0
0

I've never been an exceptional dresser. It's not for lack of effort. I just get so overwhelmed trying to make a decision sometimes that I end up wearing a bizarre medley of clothing. Unlike many of my friends who have either given up on dressing stylishly or achieved it long ago, I exist in a vague middle ground, eliciting looks that ask, "Is that what you're wearing?" and "Why wear this?" or the most frequent, “Opheli, what?”

In that respect, Keanu Reeves makes me feel less alone. He's a successful Hollywood actor who's been spotted barefoot in public more than once and has been seen in cargo capris. No one really knows if Keanu dresses the way he does because he doesn't care, or if he's trying and failing at some kind of "effortless" style. I would argue, based off of his most recent look, we're reaching new levels of apathy fashion either way.

I decided to spend a week dressing like Keanu to see if true apathy would bring me closer to a personal sense of my own fashion. To my dismay and surprise, I already owned all the items I would need for this experiment. By the end of the week, this would prompt me to max my credit card out trying desperately to distance myself from a look that I quickly realized was just “men who put minimal effort in to their outward appearance because their value is not inherently tied to their presentation.”

No shade to Keanu Reeves––who was certainly wearing the designer version of the stuff I own, which was mostly sourced from sale bins and thrift shops –– but these were terrible looks. They mostly rendered me not a subject of ridicule or weird stares, but instead just totally unspectacular in any way. As a Sagittarius with her moon in Taurus, I hated that.

After my week dressing as Keanu, I realized I looked a lot like professors walking in and out of NYU buildings, and that men can dress like shit and it’s fine. And this isn’t just limited to men who dress apathetically. Even the male style icons we’ve established as a culture dress, by and large, like fucking idiots. There’s whatever is going on here with Justin Bieber and his “got lost in Florida gift shop for maybe six years” look. And whatever the hell is going on with these dopes. I wanted to know what that kind of freedom felt like. Here's how...

Photo of Keanu via Getty

Monday

For my first day, I decided to go with the look I had dubbed “Chimney Sweep, but 2004.” After pulling on a pair a of jeans, a T-shirt that I turned inside out (I own no plain T-shirts), a black cap, a scarf draped around my neck, and the only blazer I own, I walked to my kitchen, Keanu look complete.

My roommates were already there, making coffee. Upon seeing me, they both burst out laughing. “What are you, a small French boy?” they asked. I did look like a small French boy. Later in the day, another friend asked if I was going to be performing slam poetry. I wasn’t.

On my train to class, I spilled hot coffee all over my lap. I pondered what Keanu would do in this scenario. I believe he’d keep the jeans on, not giving a second thought to the coffee stain that looked like a rorschach test covering most of his thigh. So on I went.

An afternoon meeting with a professor elicited an “Are you feeling tired?” I was tired. Was it the ragged, exhausted spirit of Keanu, seeping through my blazer and baggy T-shirt and coffee-stained pants, or was it that I was a week away from graduating college and in a fuck ton of student loan debt? Probably a bit of both.

Photo of Keanu via Bauer-Griffin

Tuesday

This was by far the worst look for me. It was pretty warm outside, so I was sweating uncontrollably. I began fantasizing about wearing shorts or tying up my shirt. Throughout the day I couldn’t stop thinking about how maybe the outfit could have looked cute with my shirt cropped. I went to my work study job on campus, to a doctor’s appointment, and to Crate & Barrel to look at furniture that costs more than my rent. I asked my friend to take photos of me on the streets of SoHo, because if I was going to submit myself to this style disaster, I was going to do it in one of the hottest fashion spots of the world.

I walked past tres chic clothier Kith multiple times during my week, and felt more judgement than I ever have in my life. People emerging from the boutique where you can buy sweatshirts for upward of $200 seemed to hate what I was wearing. I also hated what I was wearing. But as I felt their looks of disapproval, I felt good about how bad I looked. At least none of my ugly clothes cost much.

I’d like to make a particular note about the sunglasses: Never in my life have I worn a pair of sunglasses that were so tremendously unflattering. The man I bought them from seemed moderately horrified by my decision to purchase them, and I wasn’t too pleased either. But in the name of Keanu, I wore them for exactly 20 minutes before I decided I’d rather have my retinas burned to ash than wear these nose framing monstrosities for another second.

Photo of Keanu via the Image Direct

Wednesday

This was my least convincing look in that it is impossible to find army green cargo capris because it is not 2003, and I don’t have access to the Ann Taylor Loft outlet mall that’s off of a major interstate somewhere in Central Florida. I tried my best, though. I would argue this was the least susceptible outfit. I couldn’t carry around the helmet all day, but I like to think that Keanu didn’t carry around his either.

I didn’t wear the jacket because it was the first true warm day in New York City, and I wanted to feel the sun on my arms.

No one really commented on my appearance, except for a guy on my block who cat called me. One girl I know, who is decidedly cooler and better dressed than me, complimented my look. This left me confused for the rest of the day. But as I looked around, I realized that many of today’s “hottest trends” were kind of silly.

I continued to feel extremely schlubby, despite the compliment, because I think that the exact ratio of ankle Keanu and I exposed was the absolute most unflattering ––somehow showing two to four inches of ankle is currently on trend. You’d be hard pressed to find a pair of pants at Urban Outfitters that aren’t high waters right now. Even still, the four inches I was sporting made me want to die. That much pale unshaved lower leg was like a poorly placed em dash on my body.

Thursday

Any other day that felt like the worst, was quickly overtaken by Thursday, the actual worst day. I realized all of the sweatshirts I owned are cropped. So it was harder to pull off the bonnet style that Keanu was sporting in the photos, until I borrowed a co-worker’s normal-lengthed one. I spent all day at VICE HQ, and at one point I got caught trying to snap a mirror selfie in my full Keanu outfit––I darted quickly into a bathroom stall and didn’t emerge for at least ten minutes.

This made me realize the audacity one must have to not only make the decision to wear a sweatshirt on your head at all but to do so in public. Has Keanu Reeves reached a level of fame or success where looking ridiculous no longer matters? Was this look meant to conceal the fact that he is Keanu Reeves? Protect him from the rain? There’s absolutely no answer to this question that could possibly satisfy me. Maybe that's not Keanu at all? I see the resemblance, but how sure are we it's actually him?

Either way, I wore this all black, layered outfit on the first 90-degree day in New York City. I couldn’t keep my blazer on for too long because there was a real possibility I’d pass out. Taking a closer look at the photo of Keanu, it seems it wasn’t that hot out, based on the apparel worn by everyone else in frame: light layers, three-quarter length sleeves, opened aired patios. So again, it begs the question, Keanu, why in God’s name did you put that sweatshirt on your head like that? Why? Why did you (assuming that's you) do that?

Photo of Keanu via the Mega Agency

Friday

For my last day as a VICE intern, I came dressed in Keanu’s most infamous look, the barefoot, red trucker hat, scraggly mess that he was famously photographed in last week. He looked like he'd been watching Nascar for three weeks with no access to a shower or bed.

According to some sleuthing I did on various Keanu fan pages (they exist!), he was likely wearing this outfit while filming or training for some of John Wick 3, so it’s less insane than the cargo pants or sweatshirt tied to his head, in that this may have been required work wear. An old waitressing job I had required me to dress like a sailor, so I get it.

For lunch, I went to a popular Brooklyn spot that seemed to be composed entirely of people who were too wealthy to work on a Friday. So my “Keanu look” of sweatpants, oversize T-shirt, bad hair, trucker hat, and plastic slides wasn’t leaving anyone starstruck. I like to think people assumed I was so wealthy that I felt no obligation to dress decently for the public, but based off the grim look of a woman wearing what looked like a $300 skirt, I think they could detect the sale-rack quality of my clothing.

After a week of dressing in clothes that did not flatter me and were largely uncomfortable, I cared a little less about these judgey glares from people I’d never want to hang out with. But also, I like feeling good about how I look, and because of that, I clearly will be burning everything I wore this week. Especially the red trucker hat. RIP to that, and long live Keanu.

Sign up for our newsletter to get the best of VICE delivered to your inbox daily.

Follow Opheli Garcia Lawler on Twitter.

This article originally appeared on VICE US.

Deadly Lava from Hawaii's Volcano Is Still Swallowing Everything in Its Path

$
0
0

Five days after Hawaii's Kilauea volcano blew its top, the flow of lava continued to spew from fissures that snaked through surrounding neighborhoods. Roughly 1,700 locals in nearby residential areas were forced forced to evacuate as molten rock barreled through the area, engulfing at least 26 homes in its path, CNN reports.

As fountains of lava shot up 300 feet out of cracks in the ground, waves of the dense, smoldering rock swallowed up cars, devoured trees, decimated houses, and blanketed entire roads. Locals brave enough to stick around have managed to catch some of the worst of the destruction on camera, unable to do anything but wait and document the damage.

The surreal footage has captured lava completely swallowing everything in its path, reducing cars to burning metal husks, taking down power lines, and setting homes aflame.

At one point, a stream forced its way straight through a locked gate, popping the metal fence from its hinge and spilling onto the road behind it.

Others captured devastating fires engulfing homes after rivers of molten rock flowed through the neighborhood.

Luckily, it's not like lava is cascading through town like some powerful molten tsunami. As one resident put it, the flow is just slightly "faster than a turtle," allowing locals to retreat to safer ground.

First responders are reportedly ready to evacuate even more residents as fissures continue to crack open in the areas surrounding the volcano, releasing toxic gases and threatening to spew even more lava. According to Hawaii civic defense administrator Talmadge Magno, the Big Island's evacuation zone could soon grow wider.

"If things get dicey, you got to get out,” Magno said. "If you live in the surrounding communities... be prepared. Evacuation could come at any time."

Sign up for our newsletter to get the best of VICE delivered to your inbox daily.

Follow Drew Schwartz on Twitter.

Related: Volcanoes Are Erupting Across the Pacific Ring of Fire

This article originally appeared on VICE US.

For the Love of God, Don’t Meme Childish Gambino’s ‘This Is America’ Music Video

$
0
0

Childish Gambino's work has always been easy fodder for the web. His career was built on early YouTube stardom. His Billboard Top 20 hit “Redbone” became a meme by virtue of its catchiness alone. And hell, his sophomore album was literally titled Because the Internet. But what of his latest, the new Hiro Murai–directed video for “This Is America,” which the Atlantic has already hailed as, “extending a tradition spanning 'The Revolution Will Not Be Televised' to Get Out,” and which the New Yorker acknowledged as, “a powerful portrait of black-American existentialism"? Surely, given the video's serious tone and capital "I" Importance, it would be spared, right? Wrong.

The internet is the internet, after all, and it took one look at "This Is America"—the faces! the mix of laid-back gospel choirs and trap skrrts! the shock-and-awe imagery!—and got to work. On one hand, it's easy to understand why the internet immediately isolated the video’s most jarring moments and transformed them into jokes about the new Avengers movie and seasonal allergies. One second, Donald Glover is doing some weird Troy Barnes-from- Community faces, and the next he’s shooting up a gospel choir. It's surprising and elicits an immediate emotional reaction. Memes thrive on both.

On the other, had the meme economy paused for a second and thought about the meaning behind the video, it might have realized that memeing its most brutal moments proves the exact point Glover is trying to make. At a rapid-fire pace, he exposes viewers to a violent scene reminiscent of Dylann Roof’s mass shooting at a church in Charleston, then moves on, smiling, into a dance party. The symbolism of the video has been endlessly unpacked in a torrent of thinkpieces, most of which praise Glover for his indictment not only of gun violence, but of the way the entertainment industry distracts America from its problems.

While Reddit is attempting to beat this horse to death before it’s even born, Twitter is having none of the “This Is America” meme.

It’s not that memes can’t address macabre subject matter. Just look at the surprisingly dark Evil Patrick Star meme, which reveals the shittiest things friends do to one another. The Who Killed Hannibal? meme even uses guns, albeit in a way that’s built on the Eric Andre Show’s surreal and specific use of violence. Making a meme from "This Is America" isn't dumb just because of the violent imagery. It's dumb because the source material literally symbolizes the short attention span of the internet. Any meme made from "This Is America" misses its point entirely.

Even critics of the meme can fall into the trap of using it:

In summary:

Sign up for our newsletter to get the best of VICE delivered to your inbox daily.

Follow Beckett Mufson on Twitter and Instagram.

This article originally appeared on VICE US.

The Man Who Lives Inside His Dreams

$
0
0

Every morning, Stephen Wright gets up at around 4.30AM, makes a cup of tea, sits beneath the oak tree in his back garden and pretends he's the first person awake in the world. There are no sounds of passing traffic or nearby building sites, only the birds and the smell of bluebells. Whenever he sees a robin, he thinks of Donald. Then he finishes his tea and walks into his House of Dreams.

Stephen is an artist. In the late-1990s he made the decision to turn his semi-detached south London home into a work of art called The House of Dreams. It started out in just one room, but over two decades spread everywhere. He created sculptures, mosaics, paintings, writings and collages, and gathered thousands of recycled objects. The house has become a reflection of his memories, dreams and reflections, no matter how painful or personal. It’s his greatest work, and also where he eats, sleeps and lives.

When visitors come, they often cry. Others are overwhelmed by inspiration, or a sudden feeling that everything makes sense and they know just what they need to do. By the end of their visit, they want to speak to, confide in or be counselled by Stephen. It feels like there is a magnetic air of wisdom around him that you can’t help but want to feel close to. Stephen listens and hugs, he understands.

He could never have imagined that people would react like this. In fact, he could never have imagined any of the events that would happen to him during the creation of the House of Dreams; events that would shape who he is and, in turn, the appearance and meaning of his house.

The House of Dreams sits on a quaint and leafy residential street in East Dulwich, south London. The front gate is painted turquoise and features the house number (45), a letterbox and a small sign that reads "House of Dreams". Stephen was expecting me, so the latch is off. Tinsel hangs from trees, as well as teapots, coloured bleach bottles and broken dolls. On my left, the false teeth of Stephen’s parents are cemented into the step – he says hello to them every morning.

"Hello!" he says, I assume to me and not the dentures, before I step through a door covered in hundreds of coloured bottle caps and wander into his universe.

Stephen was born in Nantwich, Cheshire, in 1954. His parents lost their baby before him, and he would be their only child. His dad was a fitters mate on the railways, while his mum was a machinist and a cleaner. Despite the intense labour of his work, his dad had a gentle artistic flair and would make decorative collages to put around the house.

Stephen moved to London in the 1980s after finishing his Masters in Fine Art Textiles at Manchester University. He began renting the house he still lives in today, from a Mr Twist, a kind old man who eventually left London to retire in Somerset, selling the house to Stephen for £49,000.

Stephen made his name in the fashion world, creating what he called "wearable art pieces" – large pieces of fabric with designs printed on them. Soon he became disillusioned with the fashion industry and decided to turn his designs into a stationery business, transforming the house into a messy and pungent one-man factory for gift wrap and notebooks. These sold well; almost too well. One year, he printed over 100,000 sheets of wrapping paper by hand, and his shoulders never really recovered.

Stephen met Donald in a way strangers don't really meet anymore: on the street, during the day. Stephen was on his way to an antique fair and Donald was on his way to buy materials. They caught each other's eyes across the passing traffic as they walked in opposite directions, then turned and walked towards each other. It was a warm day. They both wore shirts: Stephen in red, Donald in check. They cycled through pleasantries: who are you, what do you do? Donald was a costume maker.

"Would you like a cup of tea back at mine?" asked Stephen. It wasn't a euphemism; they didn't have sex that day. They just talked about life, art and the West End show Cats, which Donald was working on, then made plans to meet again a week later.

Stephen was 19 years younger than Donald, but that didn't bother him. He liked the way Donald’s mind worked. He was an old soul oozing with life experience. They developed a special relationship: lovers and friends, but also teacher and student.

February 16, 1999 was a cold night in south London. When Stephen's phone rang, he knew it was Donald. He has a habit of knowing who is calling him. "There's something you should watch that’s about to come on Channel Four," said Donald. "Have you ever heard of outsider art?" Stephen hadn't. He stopped what he was doing and sat down.

The show was called Journeys Into the Outside and was presented by Pulp frontman Jarvis Cocker. In it, Cocker posited the theory that most art was completely divorced from the reality of everyday life, apart from one specific area of art: outsider art, i.e. art made by people with no art education or training, who create stuff because they simply feel compelled to do so. On his travels through France, Cocker met a milkman who had spent 50 years creating mosaics over every surface in his house with sea shells and broken crockery, and saw Le Palais idéal, a fantasy kingdom made from stone by a local postman.

When the show ended, Stephen rang Donald back immediately. "What the fuck was that about?" he beamed. "It was amazing!" They were excited, more than excited. The pair of them had been at a crossroads – Donald wanted to move on from making costumes, and Stephen had just sold his stationery business. The show felt like a sign post. Stephen would never be an outsider artist, but he was fascinated by the instincts that fuelled it. He wanted to unlearn everything.

Some of Donald and Stephen's happiest memories together are just of them talking. In one such moment, sat by the fire with a glass of wine at Stephen's house, they conceived The House of Dreams. It would be their baby, something they’d create and cherish, fuelled by their love for each other and their passion for outsider art.

In the beginning, it was more of a decorative project than anything else. Those early days were documented on video by the couple’s friend, Diane. One hot afternoon in July, she films them taking a breather in the back garden, on big wooden chairs, surrounded by bags of stuff yet to be mosaiced.

"I mean, it's really going to take the rest of our lives," Stephen says to the camera. Donald coughs. He comes across as gentle, quiet and calm, happy to let Stephen do the talking.

Donald's health had never been great. He suffered from an extremely rare autoimmune disease called Evans Syndrome, in which the body mistakenly destroys red blood cells, white blood cells and platelets. Any minimal trauma to his body was like a butterfly effect: a common cold would lead to pneumonia, a scratch from a cat would lead to a week in hospital with blood poisoning. "It was cruel," says Stephen.

They tried to not let that stop them from doing the things they wanted to do. They began visiting France frequently for supplies and inspiration: meeting outsider artists and exploring the many galleries that celebrated them. One day, they landed on the doorstep of Bodan Litnianski, a former WWII prisoner of war, turned outsider artist. He'd created a forest of giant towers in the land around his home, made from the rubbish he’d found in the tips and junkyards of the region.

Stephen had brought a fancy cake, hoping it would coax Litnianski into letting them in. When the old man came to the gate he spoke only French, and they spoke none, but it soon became clear that he wanted the cake, and they were allowed to wander around. Stephen thought the whole thing was magical. "Even at his age, he was still driven, a force of nature," he says. "I admired his single-mindedness. It’s very hard to be single-minded in this world. To just stick to your guns. I took a bit of him away with me that day and I have held it ever since. I always will."

For much of 2004, Stephen had to care for Donald and his worsening health, and their work on the House of Dreams decelerated. That Christmas, as they prepared for the train journey to Stephen's parents' house in Cheshire, it became obvious that Donald didn’t have the strength. He began coughing heavily. Stephen took him to the nearest hospital, where he was put on the ward. It was the day before Christmas Eve.

"What should I do?" said Stephen.

"Go home," said Donald.

Reluctantly, Stephen got the train to Cheshire. At 3AM he woke to the sound of the house phone ringing. It was Barbara, Donald's sister. "I think you need to come back," she said, "he’s asking for you."

When Stephen arrived at the hospital the following morning, Donald had been moved to the high dependency unit. He couldn’t breath and was only semi-conscious, surrounded by monitors, tubes and bleeps. Donald acknowledged him with small waves of the hand, little glimpses, finger taps.

Evans Syndrome was a medical conundrum, and while attempts were made to keep Donald stable, his situation only deteriorated. Days passed. Last resorts were resorted to. A decision was made to stop his medication. There was no more that could be done. Donald kept breathing.

A phone call came for Stephen at the front desk of the hospital. It was the lady who checked in on his parents. Nobody was answering their door. She couldn’t get in. Something didn’t seem right. "I'm sorry," replied Stephen, "you might just have to break down the door."

'Mum and dad have each other,' he thought. He needed to be here for Donald – he would only ever get one chance to do this.

Donald’s kidneys stopped functioning and he was no longer able to pass water. Stephen felt helpless. An intensive care nurse came in and touched Donald’s feet – his toes moved.

"I love you and I’m proud of you," said Stephen.

"Hold his hand," said the nurse, "he might be frightened."

Stephen felt like he could smell death approaching. The bleeps slowed. Donald drew three weak breaths and stopped breathing. The veins in his neck throbbed for a further minute. Then everything ceased. Donald was dead.

When a nurse entered the room to wash Donald's body, Stephen felt an urge to be involved. He put on a pink plastic apron, some rubber gloves, and filled a bowl with warm water. He never imagined he would ever find himself washing the dead body of another human being.

"When you love someone," he tells me, "you want everything to be right for them, at the end as well." That night, alone at home, he wailed screams of anguish from the pit of his stomach.

The call about Stephen's parents had been regarding his dad. He had become ill. They struggled on, but soon his mum wasn’t able to look after him and he had to go into a home. A few months later, he died. Stephen’s mum, in her late-eighties, was left alone.

Stephen started to visit her every weekend to keep her company. One day, while he was teaching in Brighton, he tried to call but it repeatedly rang out. He phoned the neighbour to go and check on her. She found his mum dead. Heart attack. It was 18 months since the death of Donald.

Stephen headed to Cheshire to empty his family home, which had always been a place filled with love – but nobody was there anymore. His dad’s shed was rammed full of bike parts and old dolls. His mum’s possessions were full of evidence of a halted life. In her handbag, he found a handwritten note on a small bit of paper that read, "Memories of the past will be our keep-safe forever, Charles Madges Stephen." He thought about her writing that, reflecting on a time when all three of them were together.

"I sifted through clothes that still had their hairs in them," he tells me. "It felt like a connection. I needed that. I needed to find my mum's hairs in her clothes, because she wasn't there anymore, only in a box."

Stephen felt abandoned, like a victim, like the three most important people in his life had just upped and left him. Back home, the House of Dreams lay in an incomplete state. He didn't look at it. It didn't interest him anymore. That was Stephen and Donald's baby, and Donald was gone.

He kept lots of their possessions. He wasn’t quite sure why, he just knew he wanted to do something with them. One day, he began to work on a set of sculptures, which he called "comfort sculptures". "I needed something to hug, because I am a huggy person," he tells me, "and it was just me in the world."

One sculpture was dressed in his mum’s cardigan, old hair curlers for a nose and yellow rubber gloves for hands. Another, titled "Bridal Spirit", was a white creature with a long curled nose wearing a wedding dress and holding a blood-stained knife. Its face had a chalky, coarse and lumpy texture.

When Donald was ill Stephen would massage camomile lotion onto his face to ease the pain. It seemed like such a beautiful thing to have been able to do for someone in their time of need. He wanted the texture to recapture that feeling.

Stephen met Michael in a way quite a few strangers do these days: via Guardian Soulmates. This was back when the dating service was a phone number you rang to leave voice messages describing yourself, and hear those left by others.

"What did you like about him?" I ask Michael.

"He was quirky, an artist," he says. "I had done three years at art school in my youth, so that grabbed me. And his tone of voice: it's a real window into someone's personality." Michael was an actor, so this kind of thing mattered.

It was two years since everyone had died, and Stephen was still grieving. The first time he and Michael met, they spoke for three hours about the experience of losing their mums. When Michael finally entered Stephen's house it was a fortress. Nobody had entered, not the postman, gas man or electrician. There were grills on the windows, bags full of flea market discoveries everywhere, and finished pieces of Stephen’s art hidden away in boxes. Michael couldn’t stand up in some rooms, and there was nowhere for him to sit down either.

When he saw the House of Dreams project lying forsaken, he encouraged Stephen to resume it. "This is really important, what you are doing," Michael said. "You need to carry on with this." Stephen rested on the idea for a few weeks.

"Then, one morning," Stephen tells me, "I decided I need to do the House of Dreams for me. For Steve. It's an important part of who I am, and I needed to say something. I needed to say it."

For the next nine years, Stephen worked secretly on the project, channeling the full force of his bereavement into it. He worked 15-hour days, and often lived on a makeshift diet of sandwiches, cakes and Bombay mix.

The purely decorative aspect of the House of Dreams fell away and powerful subtexts flooded in. Objects were still chosen for their colours, but also for the memory or symbolism attached to them. Stephen wanted things that were chipped or smelled or sticky or stained. He wanted things that were unwashed. A trace of DNA was important to him. He wanted jackets with mess spilled down them, shoes with a stench, combs with hair in – materials that had life in them. These objects quickly began to fill the walls throughout the house. When he walked from room to room, he could sometimes smell a complete stranger. He liked that.

He cried as he created, but the physical grind of the work itself became a source of solace: the birthing of a sculpture, the mixing of cement, the tedium of mosaicing, the endless sorting of objects. He fed off it. Working with his hands felt like a connection to his parents. He wanted to feel exhausted at the end of each day, he wanted to be hardly able to get into bed.

Objects that were damaged fascinated him. Dolls he brought back from flea markets were never collector's items; they were the kind that a child once loved, but then moved on and left behind. In south Paris he bought a huge box of them with no heads, covered in pigeon shit. His favourite doll in the entire house was one he found in Deptford market that had been run over by a car and left with its face caved in. "Stephen," Michael said to him one morning, "42 dolls just watched me eat a bowl of muesli."

Stephen and Michael, both in their fifties, began to fall in love. Michael helped Stephen take the grills off the windows, rip walls down to make room for the House of Dreams to expand, and encouraged him to appreciate his work more. Together they built 20 solid wood frames so Stephen's collages and paintings could be mounted on the walls.

Stephen’s dreams were vivid and intense. One night he found himself walking down a street. (As often happens in dreams, though this information was never explicitly expressed, he knew it was 1882 and he was in Oaxaca, Mexico.) The street was lined with buckets, overflowing with orange gladiolus and arum lilies. He passed some cemetery gates and walked towards a set of houses painted in vibrant turquoise, yellows and reds. His name was written above the door of a turquoise house. He entered, and in the corner of the room was a shrine, filled with photographs, candles and trinkets. That’s when he woke up.

"Quite an intense dream," I say.

"A vision," Stephen corrects me. "I had been shown myself in a former life."

"I see. What did you do?" I ask.

"Well, I just had to find this house," says Stephen.

He flew to Mexico alone, travelled to Oaxaca and found a scene that appeared, to Stephen, to be identical to that which he saw in his dream. He wasn’t going to come all this way without getting inside, he thought, so he knocked on the door of the turquoise house.

"A little lady answered," he explains. "She smiled. Probably in her forties. I tried to explain to her that I wanted to get into the house to see where I was born. She didn’t understand – why would she? But she invited me in. Her husband and child were there in the back room. She made me a sweet drink, which was not very nice, but I drank it to be polite. And, believe it or not, she left me alone. I looked around and there was the shrine. Photographs, candles and things on this little table. I cried, because I'd seen this before. I knew this house."

In Mexico, Stephen had found a new way of looking at death. There it was, open and explored, celebrated in expressions of colour, art and humour. It spoke to Stephen. He returned to England with materials for the house: cases full of religious ornaments, glass eyeballs, handcrafted figurines, dolls' heads, discarded family photos and many other things in startling colours.

He became increasingly influenced by cultures that dealt with loss in much more visceral and spiritual ways than Britain. Places where the burden of bereavement was explored and expressed; where people didn't dress in black and avert their eyes; where grief was not expected to be kept behind closed doors.

He went back to Mexico. He studied Haitian vodou and began to incorporate some of its exuberance into his art. He went to India with Michael, to Varanasi, and to the banks of the Ganges, where they both watched as families publicly bathed their lost loved ones, wrapped them in linen and then cremated them on a wooden pyre.

"Watching someone burn was a privilege," says Stephen. "It was so hands-on. In our society, everything is taken out of our hands. If it's a loved one, why would you want to hand them over to a stranger? England is in denial in so many ways. Everything is private, not spoken about, black, tight, controlled. It's fucked up, really."

Throughout the passing of Donald and his parents, Stephen had kept diaries. One day he put some thin wooden boards on the floor of his living room and began transcribing onto them with a paintbrush. The diary entries he chose were graphic and honest. One huge board focused in detail on the day Donald died. It seemed important to him not to block anything and just allow the work to come through. The boards would eventually line the corridor of the House of Dreams.

"I felt the bereavement go through my arm, into the brush and into the paint, and onto the board, and I'd leave a bit of it over there," he says. "Then I’d do it again and leave a bit more. The act of making was a way of getting rid of it. I learned that. I didn't know that. But it's true."

"Cathartic?" I say.

"Completely and utterly," says Stephen. "What a wonderful thing to learn. What an awful way to learn it."

"It's quite beautiful that something you created together helped you overcome his death. Do you think the House of Dreams would exist if you’d never met him?" I ask.

"Good question," says Stephen. A word tries to escape his mouth, but he pulls it back in and pauses. Whenever I’ve made assumptions or put words into Stephen’s mouth, he pauses, thinks and re-moulds it into something precise that he can agree or disagree with. He never simply nods or shrugs.

"Probably not," he says.

Stephen doesn’t really know why he opened the House of Dreams to the public, but he likes the idea of not really understanding the things he does. At first, he opened it for six days a year. On those days, around 20 visitors would arrive. That was fine: he had no desire to advertise it anywhere, and the intention was never to make money.

Strangers started tossing stuff over his wall. One day it was a bin-bag full of manky wigs. Another time it was the head of a decapitated ceramic leopard. Once it was a deer skull with antlers and a note that said "For you". It seemed the house had become known as a place where unwanted objects could be given a new life or purpose.

Stephen loved it. He put the deer skull above the fireplace in his living room. The leopard became the head of a mosaic goddess. When the manky wigs came, he and Michael spent the day trying them on. Then he glued them all to a door in the house. Hair door. It looked interesting, very interesting, but it was an impractical covering for a door. I mean, you couldn't see the handle at all. So, rather reluctantly, he removed them.

But as word of mouth spread about the House of Dreams, a demand began to swell. Six open days a year became one day a month. Twenty people a day became 100 per day, which became selling out in advance. As I write this, the house is fully booked until July, and is receiving bookings up until October. In June, the Royal Academy will be doing an exclusive excursion for its members.

"Is there anyone that doesn't enjoy the house?" I ask Stephen.

"It's very rare," says Stephen. "But I have to say, straight men are threatened by the House of Dreams. They come with their wife or their partner, they stand on the doorstep, gasp and say, 'This is not for me,' and go to the pub."

One day, a visitor called Elizabeth came. It was her second time, and she wanted to speak to Stephen. Her mother had died. It had been completely unexpected. While clearing her mum's house she kept coming across pairs of spectacles of various styles, shades and shapes.

Elizabeth: "The glasses were part of her being."
Stephen: "I understand that."
Elizabeth: "And that’s why it feels like they belong somewhere like here."

Stephen took her downstairs, and they picked a spot together. About a metre-and-a-half up the wall in Stephen's corridor, surrounded by felt tip pens and a pillar made of Coca-Cola bottle tops, there sits a shrine to Elizabeth's mum, a woman Stephen never met. It's a spiral made from all the spectacles, with her name written in the centre.

I find myself staring at this shrine for a while one afternoon while Stephen potters in his studio. For the first time in years, I think of my aunty Angela's bookcase. She died before I was born, killed in a car crash at 21 years old. She had been a pillar of the family, the oldest of five, and had helped my grandma raise the others. When grandma got up in the night to bottle-feed the newborn twins (my uncles), Angela got up with her to feed the other.

There has always been a bookcase of Angela's books in grandma's house, exactly how she left them. As I grew up, and got old enough to read, these books became how I got to know Angela, and I learned things about her nobody could ever tell me. Spike Milligan's Puckoon showed me she had a goofy sense of humour, Margaret Drabble’s Jerusalem the Golden showed me she thought deeply about what it is to be a woman, Jean-Paul Sartre's Nausea showed me she had a dark side and was probably way more intelligent than me.

The spines were crinkled, pages were marked with spilled tea, margins were filled with annotations around lines she found interesting. In my own books, I still mimic the messy and cartoonish way she always wrote her name in the inside cover. For me, Angela’s spirit didn’t live in the gravestone we visited at the village cemetery, it lived in the bookcase. In the same way Elizabeth's mum's personality beams at me as I stare at her eccentric and excessive spectacles collection.

I join Stephen in his studio at the back of the house. His laptop is playing "The Gate" by Bjork. The choral harmonies mix eerily with the drumming sound of rain against the corrugated plastic sheeting on the studio roof.

"I love this song," says Stephen softly, "it feels... medieval." He pulls out a huge cardboard box and places it very carefully onto his desk. "We get three or four of these a week now," he says.

I open it. The box is full of objects: cuddly toys, jewellery, ornaments, a photo of someone holding an elderly person’s hand. They were all sent to Stephen by past visitors; possessions of their deceased loved ones. They want them to be part of the House of Dreams.

I pick up a photo of a smiling woman called Penny, who looks to be in her late thirties. She had been a children's author until she died of cancer. Her husband visited a few months ago, and left the toy of a character she’d created. Stephen turns Bjork up a little.

"Do you feel, like, does this move you when you listen to it? It sort of goes there, doesn't it," he says, pointing to his chest. "What is going on there then? I love it."

"Where will you put Penny?" I ask.

"I'm not sure yet. I’m working on a new room in secret and I think she might go there," he replies.

"The house is becoming a public shrine," I say.

"It was never my intention," says Stephen, "but I don't mind being someone who listens, hears people's stories. It's about being human. We are all here to support each other in some way. So it's not a problem. My heart is big enough to do that."

Last summer, Stephen had a meltdown. He found himself, in the living room, screaming, "I’m sick of feeling like a fucking victim!" He could feel himself losing it. Thirteen years later, the trauma still stalked him like a pack of wolves – this felt like their last stand. He phoned his counsellor, who he hadn’t seen in years. He phoned Michael, and also his friend Ted. Within half an hour, all three of them converged on his doorstep. He talked through everything with them: Donald, his dad, his mother.

"I realised that I wasn't a victim," says Stephen. "They didn't choose to go. Life and death made them go. They didn’t walk away from me. That was a turning point, really. Ever since then, I've felt completely different about everything. It's like a cloud has gone. I am healed. Have you ever heard the Stephen Sondheim song, 'I'm Still Here'?"

I shake my head.

"Well, that's how I feel," he says. "It shows me I'm quite strong. If I can get through that, then I am strong. I like to be strong on my own. It's important to me."

You don't need to spend long with Stephen to notice that he has a sort of unspoken philosophy guiding him, that I imagine has grown organically through his experiences. When we talk about the most painful moments in his life, he always describes them as "interesting". Going to his parents' empty house was interesting, watching Donald die was interesting, having a breakdown was interesting. It's like he's found a way to see everything that’s happened to him as a lesson he can absorb and learn from.

The irony of the House of Dreams is that as it is soaring in popularity, Stephen’s attention to it is now winding down a little. Where once it was his main focus, it now shares his attention with multiple new projects: a book about alter-egos, new paintings, and an art fair in 2019. He can see a time approaching when he won’t want to do this anymore.

"When?" I ask.

"Not quite yet," he says, "but I can see a point when I will have said what I wanted to say with this. I don't know, I'm very fickle. You never know what life will throw at you."

For now, he has bequeathed the house to the National Trust, who will manage it once he isn’t around. Downstairs, his studio is filling up with new work: a series of black-and-white paintings of various monsters and creatures. Where once he used black-and-white to depict his mourning, now he does it to challenge himself.

"You can hide behind colour," he tells me, "but black-and-white is very exposing and basic. I like that about it."

"And the monsters?" I ask.

"I feel like they exist somewhere else," he says, "and I am just making them real through the process of working. I never know what they are going to be, but I do think they have a sprinkling of all of the past in them."

On our final day together, Stephen and I sit down to run through some fact-checking. He's stressed and distracted. The builders are in and the house is covered in scaffolding. They are converting the unused loft into a new space for him to live and work in – the House of Dreams is chasing him into the skies. We sit with tea in hand-painted china cups, and listen to Michael and the builders stomping around above us.

There's a commotion near the skylight and we both look up expecting a foot or a backside to come through the ceiling. Michael comes scampering down the ladder to relay some information in hushed tones before heading back up, and it reminds me of some sort of French resistance comedy sketch. A call comes down, Stephen is needed. I ask if I can look through the House of Dreams guest books while he's gone.

There are messages from all over the world. Some are amazed by the fact that Stephen kept working on something so strange and unique for such a long period of time, without ever being derailed by self-doubt or criticism. Another writes: "You have opened my eyes and made me believe in myself." Others thank him for creating what feels like a shelter from the monotony of the outside world. One guy has just written "DOPE HOUSE!"

But then there are hundreds of messages from those who seem to have connected with it on a deeper level.

"Words cannot convey how much you gave me today," Emer.

"Coming in here has reminded me I’m not alone in the world," Kesley.

"I struggle with so many demons. I think what I have learned from you may help me survive," Dasha.

As Stephen has overcome his grief, so has the house. Death still lurks, he doesn’t hide that, but now it is joined by an overwhelming sense of joy. He’s created new memory boards that capture funny moments from his childhood. There’s a framed picture of Michael, smiling, "partner and loyal friend" written beneath. There’s a vibrant sculpture about his sexual energies, with huge breasts and two shiny Christmas baubles as testicles.

People don’t connect with this strange and illogical place because it symbolises the day someone’s world fell apart. They connect because it symbolises what happens the day after your world falls apart. In every object, from the dentures on the doorstep to the doll with the caved in face, the message from Stephen is clear: Your life can and will go on, no matter how awful it gets.

@joe_zadeh / @cbethell_photo

This article originally appeared on VICE UK.

Saudi Arabia Premieres Its First Cinema in 35 Years

$
0
0

This article originally appeared on VICE Arabia

"It's an unbelievable feeling," says Mohamed, 28, as he steps into the first cinema opened in Saudi Arabia in 35 years to see Marvel's hit Black Panther. "My love of films has always been a big part of my life, but this feels different. To be honest, I never thought this day would come."

In the early 1980s, Saudi Arabia banned cinemas under pressure from religious groups who wanted to restrict all public forms of entertainment where men and women could mix. But it was announced last year that the ban would be lifted as part of the government's Saudi 2030 vision – an initiative that aims to reduce the country's dependence on oil by promoting other sectors, such as the entertainment industry. The programme, led by the Deputy Prime Minister, Crown Prince Mohammed bin Salman, also hopes to soften Saudi Arabia's social image across the globe.

"I feel like we're now equal to other film buffs around the world," Mariam, 25, tells me. "We can now watch movies at their release rather than having to wait months to see it on TV or download it online. For so long, so many people have been passionately opposed to this idea that I genuinely never thought it would actually happen." But it did. And on the 28th of April – after ten days of private, VIP screenings – Black Panther opened to the general public.

The theatre is located in the King Abdullah district in the capital city, Riyadh, where there was a real buzz in the days leading up to the cinema's opening. "Tickets for the entire opening week sold out in minutes," explains film blogger, Abdel Aziz Zamel. "In spite of the fact that we haven't had a cinema here in 35 years, I'd say that, compared to the rest of the Arab region, we are the most passionate about film. I've seen studies that show more than 90 percent of cinema-goers in Bahrain, for example, are Saudis."

Every year, the government estimates hundreds of thousands of Saudis travel abroad to watch films and indulge in activities that are banned in their own country. This is exactly what Prince bin Salman is trying to reverse, hoping to claw back some of the $22 billion Saudis spend abroad annually on the global entertainment industry. "Like many of my friends, I would spend days in Bahrain alone just watching films, but now I don't need to waste all that money on travelling to another country," says Abdel.

The country's influential clerics seem to accept the government's view that this can be done while maintaining the country's traditions. "We need to make sure that we still respect the culture of our society and the fact that it is a conservative one, just like what happens in other Gulf countries," Abdel says. "That's why I support censorship and the need to restrict certain inappropriate content."


WATCH: A Saudi Prince Created a Comic-Book Heroine Who Wears a Veil


The Ministry of Culture and Information awarded the licence to run the Riyadh theatre to American cinema chain AMC – which operates around 1,000 theatres around the world. Over the next five years, AMC plan to open 40 more cinemas in 15 cities across Saudi Arabia.

With the majority of Saudi Arabia's 32 million person population under the age of 30, the government expects that peak demand will eventually lead to around 350 cinemas being built, offering more than 2,000 screens by 2030.

At 75 riyals (£15) a ticket, however, many people are hoping that the eventual expansion will lead to far cheaper tickets prices. "Whenever something is rare, it's expensive," Abdel tells me. "Because there is only one cinema in Saudi Arabia, they think it's OK to charge that much. But I'm sure the prices will drop as more cinemas open up."

But, until then, many young people like Sana, a 20-year-old university student, are reluctant to spend that much money, especially considering "the theatre is just a converted concert hall, which hasn't even been modified that well [...] As things stand, it's just not good enough in terms of comfort and service, yet AMC are still exploiting the situation by charging us so much."

It's hard to disagree with Sana's view, considering AMC's chief executive, Adam Aaron, confirmed at CinemaCon that ticket prices could even rise to as high as £25 in the next few months due to the demand. "Honestly, [the price] is too low," he said. "Pent up demand is so high that at the moment price is not a barrier."

Yet people remain supportive, not least because this new investment will hopefully create a bigger platform for locally-produced Arabic films. "Saudi movies are unique and wonderful – they deserve to be showcased in cinemas, and I'm sure that when they are, people will love them," Abdel tells me. "With the increase in investment, I can't wait to watch our own films on the big screen and see them spread to other countries as a way of introducing Saudi culture to the world."

This article originally appeared on VICE AR.

A Far Right Albertan Militia Tried to Open a Chain of Addiction Recovery Homes

$
0
0

In December, I received a rather unexpected phone call from a notorious far-right figure.

"What's shaking, man?" asked Beau Welling, the leader of the armed patriot group III% Alberta, before launching into what can only be described as a sales pitch. "There’s a huge, huge opportunity to help thousands and thousands of lives... this is a massive, massive thing, this is a huge program.... It could be a huge story. It'll go national in an instant."

Welling had heard that I was looking into a housing project his group was attempting to get off the ground. I had gotten word the group planned to launch a recovery home system in Edmonton called the The Freedom House Canada Recovery Homes. The leader of the anti-Muslim militia told me that he expected this project to turn around the public's perception of the group.

You can read an in-depth profile of the group below.

Using charitable actions as a public-relations exercise is not new to the threepers, other far-right groups in Canada, or really any other extremist group. Dr. Barbara Perry, one of Canada’s leading researchers on the domestic far-right, said that this strategy has been around forever.

"I don't know if we've seen too much of that here in Canada but it's always been a part of the strategy associated with folks in the US. It's sort of this rebranding, it's in line with their broader philosophy,” Dr. Perry told VICE.

“Normally their rhetoric would be enhancing the community by getting rid of people who weren't like us, but this in this sense it's about building community to strengthen it to presumably better resist the incursions of all those immigrants and Muslims and all those people they fear."

One of the images created by the threepers for the recover homes. Photo via Facebook.

A recovery home is a privately-owned group home for residents recovering from drug addiction. Less regulated than government-run rehab or detox centres, recovery homes aim to offer shelter, food, stability, and usually abstinence-based counselling. With overdose deaths in western Canada showing no signs of slowing, the recovery industry has been under a closer microscope.

After several months, the threepers’ recovery home plan seemed to fizzle out—but after a significant effort. The group consulted with existing recovery homes—VICE spoke with one that was contacted by the threepers for consulting work but did not want to go on the record. Inside their closed Facebook page, the threepers held auctions among themselves—selling bikes, knives, and whatnot—with the money going to the group homes. Welling and the other members leading on this project also had a entire proposal drafted to transfer “43 rental properties” over to the threepers for “a systematic recovery program managed by III% Alberta under the supervision of Beau Welling.” You can read the document in full below.

The threepers claimed they offered homes; required a 30-day, 60-day, or 90-day commitment; have 24/7 security; offered camps that included survivalist training; and charged $500 to $1,200 a month. As Welling didn’t answer follow up questions, how much of this is real and how much of it just bullshit is not clear (Welling is known to exaggerate). During its initial push though, it’s clear from posts in a closed Facebook group that while Welling talked a lot about helping people, positive media attention for his group was very important to him.

“This is a great huge project to get involved in and will put us huge into the public’s eye and media as the great awesome helpful never standing alone citizens we are,” Welling wrote. “...Guys this is huge, and will definitely put us into the media and public spotlight on a huge, huge positive nite [sic.]”

One of the images created by the threepers for the recover homes. Photo via Facebook.

The tactic of using charitable action like this is pretty straightforward: organizations that hold extremist views use it as an attempt to water down or cleanse their image. A clear example comes from the Soldiers of Odin, who, in 2016, were doing street clean ups and raising money for food banks while also spreading anti-Muslim rhetoric and marching the streets. The actions garnered the SOO positive media attention from some outlets, many of which failed to mention that the group was founded by a self-described Finnish white supremacist. In late 2017, La Meute, a far-right group in Quebec, attempted to work with a Montreal foundation that raises money for at-risk kids but were turned down.

European groups are far more explicitly racist than their Canadian counterparts, but this is something we see more and more across the pond as well. The neo-Nazi group National Action (working with the Polish Narodowe Odrodzenie Polski) formed a white-only homeless shelter. Looking back several years you can find that even the KKK did this type of action in the 1960s. As recently as 2012 the KKK attempted (and failed) to adopt a highway.

Three threepers pose at a meeting. Photo via Facebook.

These types of “charitable” endeavors also work as a recruiting tool; in particular, allowing them access to people from vulnerable communities. The idea of a far-right group running a recovery home, working with recovering drug users, and recruiting out of it was described as “frightening” by Laurie de Grace, the executive director of Our House Addiction Recovery in Edmonton.

"I don't know if you've heard this but they always say with addiction that people stop developing their emotional age at the time they start using,” de Grace told VICE. “If people start using drugs at 12 or 13, emotionally they're very young. So when you think the adult brain isn't fully developed until the early 20s most people with addictions they started using young, so think about how vulnerable and impressionable they are."

On the phone, Welling told me they’d already acquired numerous homes and had been given millions of dollars in funding. Welling did not respond when asked to prove these assertions and VICE was unable to find any documentation suggesting this was true. But while it would be difficult for them to pull this off, recovery home systems in Canada are notoriously lax, so it’s not completely out of reason.

While the recovery homes plan was an ongoing point of conversation for months in their closed Facebook groups throughout 2017, the project was last mentioned in January 2018. Beau also stopped returning my calls and messages requesting comment. The death blow to the idea seemingly came when the group launched a GoFundMe page asking for $150,000 but only three people donated to the cause to the tune of only $300.

This paltry 0.02 percent of money raised indicates that Canadians still aren’t latching onto far-right groups in the way the organizations are hoping, said Perry.

"They failed in their crowdfunding efforts, quite spectacularly, and I think that is an indication that it is no more palatable,” she told VICE. “That Canadians are able to see through their disingenuousness of their attempts."

It seems that this time Canadians didn’t “drink the kool-aid” but it’s only a matter of time until the far-right groups hand us another cup.

Sign up for the VICE Canada Newsletter to get the best of VICE Canada delivered to your inbox daily.

Follow Mack Lamoureux on Twitter


15-Year-Old Girl Charged With Trying to Kill ‘Animal Whisperer’ Cop

$
0
0

A 15-year-old girl has been charged with the attempted murder of a cop following a stabbing in Halifax, Nova Scotia. The girl and a 15-year-old boy were arrested Tuesday morning and are both facing multiple charges following an incident, Global News reports.

The incident occurred after police located a stolen truck at 5:49 AM Tuesday. One officer approached two people seen fleeing the truck and found them nearby a golf course, according to Halifax police. When the cop tried to talk to the suspects, one allegedly stabbed him. According to police, both suspects then tried to flee. The two teens were located soon after and arrested.

Most recent reports say the girl who allegedly stabbed the officer is in hospital with non-life-threatening injuries. Police say that “her injuries were not as a result of the arrest of any police action.”

The cop she allegedly tried to kill, Constable Andrew Gordon, had surgery after being taken to the ER following the incident. Reportedly, he is in stable condition.

Gordon has been referred to as the “Animal Whisperer” in Halifax due to animal rescues he conducted in the past as a police officer. He has rescued ducklings, a dog, and a seal pup, according to Halifax Regional Police’s Facebook page. Gordon has been with the force for eight years, CBC News reports.

Both teenagers allegedly involved in the incident are reportedly from the town of Truro, Nova Scotia. Halifax is about an hour’s drive from Truro.

The 15-year-old girl, in addition to the attempted murder charge, is facing charges of resisting arrest, possession of a weapon, two counts of theft under $5,000, break and enter, theft of a vehicle, possession of a stolen vehicle, dangerous driving, and mischief over $5,000.

The boy is facing charges for possession of a weapon, two counts of theft under $5,000, break and enter, theft of a vehicle, possession of a stolen vehicle, and joy riding.

Not all of the above charges are related to the incident in Halifax; some of the alleged crimes occurred in the teens’ hometown.

Police recovered the stolen truck and four knives in the investigation.

The girl is set to appear in court upon her release from hospital.

Jordan Peele's 'New Nightmare' Is Coming and the Rumored Cast Is Insane

$
0
0

Oscar-award winning screenwriter Jordan Peele is currently working on a show about Nazi hunters in the 1970s, rebooting The Twilight Zone, producing a series based on Lovecraft County, and even pulling an unofficial Key & Peele reunion in an upcoming kid's movie. And, because apparently the guy isn't a mere mortal who needs food and rest or whatever, he's also found time to get moving on his next horror film, too.

On Tuesday night, Peele took to Twitter to announce the title of his anticipated follow-up to Get Out—it's called Us, and the rumored cast list sounds incredible.

Lupita Nyong’o is in talks to star in the upcoming film alongside Elisabeth Moss, who Peele is also eyeing for a main role, Variety reports. Winston Duke, who starred alongside Nyong'o in Black Panther, is also rumored to be coming onboard. At this point, none of the cast list is set in stone, but let's hope these aren't just rumors—a Lupita Nyong’o and Elisabeth Moss vehicle written and directed by Jordan Peele sounds incredible.

According to the Hollywood Reporter, the upcoming film will focus on "two couples, one white, one black" and the poster promises a "new nightmare" from Peele, but don't expect him to just redo Get Out again. This one, Peele has promised, is a whole new thing—though it'll likely still be a genre-bender.

"One thing I know is that this is genre; and playing around with the thriller, horror, action, fun genre of intrigue is my favorite. That’s my sweet spot," Peele said, speaking about the then-untitled film back in February. "So I think tonally [Us] should resemble Get Out. That said, I want to make a completely different movie. I want to address something different than race in the next one."

Us is due out in March 15, 2019, so we have a long wait until it actually hits theaters—luckily, Peele will probably have cranked out another billion projects to tide us over in the meantime.

Sign up for our newsletter to get the best of VICE delivered to your inbox daily.

Follow VICE on Twitter.

This article originally appeared on VICE US.

Jonathan Cheban's 24-Karat Gold Chicken Wings Are Way Too Extra

$
0
0

Do you like wings? How about wasting money? Then, boy, do we have the perfect dish for you!

Kim Kardashian's bestie Jonathan Cheban, AKA Foodgōd, apparently helped create a new type of chicken wings for a New York restaurant that are literally covered in gold. During Tuesday's episode of Desus & Mero , the VICELAND hosts discussed the ridiculously lavish dish and how much they hate it.

You can watch the latest episode of DESUS & MERO for free, online, right now. New episodes Monday to Thursday at 11PM on VICELAND.COM.

To stay up-to-date on all things VICELAND Canada, sign up for our newsletter.

This article originally appeared on VICE US.

Watch These Men Calmly Respond to Woman’s Racist Tirade at an Alberta Denny’s

$
0
0

A viral video showing a woman hurling racist remarks at a table of men at a Lethbridge, Alberta Denny’s is being condemned by the city’s mayor.

The video, which was posted on Facebook and Twitter, shows a woman sitting next to a man at a booth inside the restaurant; however she is facing a group of at least three men at the next table and berating them, seemingly because she doesn’t believe they are Canadian.

“Shut your fucking mouth then, ‘cause you know what? You’re dealing with a Canadian woman right now and I will leap across this table and punch you right in your fucking mouth,” the woman says as the video starts.

“You’re a fucking ignorant prick, is what you are,” she continues, as one of the men laughs.

“Ahahaha, yeah you’re fucking funny. Go back to your fucking country,” the woman says.

In response, one of the men, seen on camera calmly drinking what appears to be water, says “Don’t say that... Just respect, don’t say like that.”

The man seated with the angry woman instructs the table of men to “relax.”

The woman goes on to repeat that she is Canadian, to which one of the men says “We’re all Canadians. We’re all the same, you’re a human being, I’m a human being, there’s nothing special about you.”

The woman insists the men are not Canadian and asks if they pay taxes. One of the men responds, “fucking of course I pay taxes.”

“Oh everybody pays taxes really? You do? You were born and raised here? Not all your friends pay taxes here,” the woman retorts.

Near the end of the clip, she climbs up in her booth to fully turn around and face them.

“You’re not dealing with one of your Syrian bitches right now. You’re dealing with a Canadian woman and I’m not going to be talked down to by you,” she says. “You laugh all you want. That’s a prime example of why we don’t want you here.”

Although social media posts indicate the incident happened last night, a manager at the Lethbridge Denny’s location told VICE it took place earlier than that. Lethbridge police also told VICE the incident didn’t happen last night, but they said they would provide more details later today. The man who posted the video, Monir Omerzai, indicated on Facebook that he was one of the men being attacked and that cops and restaurant staff asked his group to leave before asking the woman to leave.

The Denny’s manager, who hung up before giving his name, said his staff called police and he believes police escorted both parties out of the restaurant, however he said he was not working at the time.

Lethbridge Mayor Chris Spearman described the incident as racist and embarrassing in a Facebook post.

“We are working hard to address racism and bigotry but can not prevent ignorance and the hostile behaviour of individuals. Most Lethbridge citizens are proud of our reputation as a city that welcomes immigrants and refugees,” Spearman wrote, going on to name several local initiatives that support immigrants, including a newly expanded Lethbridge Family Services, an Islamic Centre, and a multi-cultural centre.

Denny’s head office has not yet responded to VICE’s request for comment.

Follow Manisha Krishnan on Twitter.

Richard Spencer's Credit Card Was Apparently Declined for a $4.25 Drink

$
0
0

Things don't appear to be going too well for Richard Spencer. It seems that his time in the spotlight as that racist in a suit who helped legitimize the alt-right and put Donald Trump in office is coming to an end. His marriage dissolved due to the stress of being a white nationalist propagandist, and he's been begging for money on crowdfunding sites ever since his lawyer dropped him after he was sued for participating in the deadly Unite the Right rally in Charlottesville.

And, apparently, he needs the money. Like—really needs it. According to a Facebook post from the co-owner of a bar in Spencer's hometown of Whitefish, Montana, the guy who popularized the euphemistic term "alt-right" couldn't even afford a $4.25 Bourbon over the weekend.

Spencer isn't the only alt-right figurehead who's been having a hard time visiting local watering holes as of late. In April, a judge ruled that bars have every right to kick out people wearing MAGA hats if they want. That same month, fellow fallen asshole Milo Yiannopoulos and his sidekick Chadwick Moore were chanted out of a Manhattan pub by a local Democratic Socialists of America chapter. But rather than kick Spencer out of the Great Northern Bar and cause a scene for the rest of his patrons, co-owner Doug Rommereim chose another shaming tactic, he explained to AM station KGVO.

"I would never put someone's credit card up like that because they got declined, I would never do that," he said. "Except in this one instance where I thought it was kind of funny."

Unlike other celebrities who have had their receipts posted online for stiffing local establishments, Spencer didn't just forget to tip his bartender—it seems like he might be completely out of money. Of course, there are other reasons a card could get declined other than lack of funds—as one Redditor suggested, it's possible he has more than one bank account and just uses a card attached to the empty one when he feels like being a dick to his server.

But if the legal tactic he once used to bully his way onto university campuses isn't working, and he's actually broker than a college student like Rommereim's Facebook post suggests, that doesn't bode well for the alt-right movement in general.

"I am under attack," Spencer said in April when he begged for $25,000 to fight his Charlottesville lawsuit. "Losing this case would be catastrophic for our movement, for everyone engaged is dissident politics, to be honest."

Sign up for our newsletter to get the best of VICE delivered to your inbox daily.

Follow Allie Conti on Twitter.

This article originally appeared on VICE US.

Viewing all 38002 articles
Browse latest View live




Latest Images