Quantcast
Channel: VICE CA
Viewing all 38002 articles
Browse latest View live

The VICE Guide to Right Now: Trump Has Tapped Rick Perry for Energy Secretary

$
0
0

Perry on 'Dancing with the Stars.' Thumbnail photo by Gage Skidmore

Donald Trump has picked ex-Texas governor and animal-science enthusiast Rick Perry to lead the Department of Energy, according to the president-elect's transition team.

Perry—who once called Trump a "cancer on conservatism"—famously forgot the name of the department he's now tapped to lead during a 2011 primary debate while listing off governmental agencies he would get rid of if he were president.

As energy secretary, Perry would be responsible for energy research and regulation, as well as overseeing the nation's nuclear weapon stockpile. Politico reports that Perry has been a favorite for conservatives for the role, seeing him as someone who will bring reform in the department that has focused on clean energy and reducing fossil fuel dependence under the Obama administration.

Trump has said that he wants to roll back fossil fuel regulations put in place by the Obama administration during his first 100 days in office, which Perry could play a key role in.

It's still unclear, though, if Perry will continue all the Department of Energy's top-secret investigations into the Upside-Down if he is confirmed by the Senate for the position.


Immortal Technique Tells Us What Really Happened Between Him and Lin-Manuel Miranda

$
0
0

Last month Hamilton's Lin-Manuel Miranda told the world that when he was in high school, he fell victim to the local bully—a bully who grew up to be rapper/activist Immortal Technique. To learn more about the story, VICELAND's Desus & Mero had Miranda's former classmate, MSNBC's Chris Hayes, onto the show to talk about it.

But now, the man himself, Immortal Technique, decided to stop on by and give Desus Nice and the Kid Mero the scoop on what really went down in high school.

Along with sharing his side of the bullying story, the rapper told Desus and Mero about his turbulent past, and how it's imperative that we change society's systemic issues with youth and violence.

Be sure to catch new episodes weeknights at 11:30 PM ET/PT on VICELAND.

After Mourning the Charleston Shooting Victims, White People Still Voted Trump

$
0
0

People pray outside Charleston's AME Emmanuel Church two days after Dylann Roof shot nine people. Photo by Mladen Antonov/AFP/Getty Images

Marjorie McIver said she didn't want to talk politics. She was mindful about how she would be perceived, how her words might be used, or misused, no matter how carefully she explained herself. I want to talk about her, though, because her story upends a central narrative surrounding Donald Trump's victory, that personal pain makes people susceptible to those, like our president-elect, willing their exploit anguish.

She deftly veered our discussion away from the 2016 election after I asked her about the possibility that Hillary Clinton could become this country's female president. This was in early February, two weeks before Trump won the Republican primary in our home state of South Carolina. He'd receive nearly 50 percent of the vote in Horry County, where we lived, home to tourist mecca Myrtle Beach.

We were sitting down at her kitchen eating the salad, fried pork chops, and beans she had cooked. I wasn't there to talk politics. As crazy as it sounds, I brought up the presidential campaign to lighten the mood because what we had been discussing felt so heavy. She had just explained why she was having trouble getting to sleep at night and getting out of bed every morning.

"I have visions of that night," she said.

That night was June 17, 2015, one day after Trump rode down an escalator and announced his candidacy by suggesting that Mexican immigrants were rapists and murderers. That night was when a young white supremacist named Dylann Roof sat inside Emanuel AME Church in Charleston listening to people study the Bible and praying, then shot nine people in cold blood, including Myra Thompson, McIver's sister.

"I could still see my sister bullet-ridden; that's not a good feeling," she told me while standing over a hot stove. "When it flashes in my mind that way, I ask God to take it, and I put it in his hands. Invariably, something weeks later might trigger that episode. It's a situation that saddens me, then I feel the hurt again and try to numb it out. I have to believe that she's in a place where she's at peace. I believe in a Heaven. I have to believe that's where she is."

We have spoken a few times since then, including the day I took my kids over to her house on the first anniversary of the shooting just to tell her we were still thinking about her. It's not quite right to say things have changed since then. They have simply revealed themselves in ways I know McIver hoped they wouldn't. Now she's spending time in a courtroom during a federal trial, where she'll contend with Roof's video confession and ugly images from the bloody crime scene. She'll wait to see whether Roof will be given a life sentence or the death penalty before possibly having to do it again when South Carolina tries him for the same crimes.

Since that night, though, McIver has begun to heal. She attended the "there are no words" performance in Charleston in which composer James Stephenson honored each victim individually with a special rendition of "Amazing Grace." (Thompson's piece was performed by a flutist, which was serendipity or a God-sent coincidence in McIver's eyes; her sister was a flute player.) There was the memorial service attended by President Barack Obama, South Carolina governor Nikki Haley, other major dignitaries, and thousands of everyday mourners.

Then came what had long seemed an impossibility in South Carolina: The Confederate flag was finally removed from the State House grounds. The state's white residents, for decades, had convinced themselves that the flag—a symbol of the enslavement of black people—wasn't about racism but the heritage and pride of the South. They thought attempts to have it removed were mere political correctness, even though it served as a slap in the face to the state's 30 percent black population.

Support for Trump has been rationalized as not being about race the same way support for the Confederate flag was long rationalized.

Though the flag is still down, that tension remains, and perhaps no one knows this better than McIver. Many of the people who had cried with her at public events went on to go to Trump's rallies and vote for him, even though Haley said that rhetoric like Trump's helped pave the way for the attack at Emmanuel. They participated in several public displays of unity, including a handholding exercise across the Ravenel bridge, spent weeks dropping off teddy bears and flowers and encouraging notes at a makeshift memorial in front of the church, an interracial public declaration that Roof's desire for a "race war" would get no traction in their city or state. Then they voted for Trump.

Marilyn Hemingway, a black Charleston resident, saw that duality firsthand, the ability some had to cry with black people over what Roof had done, then support a politician who had used the kind of language they all knew had contributed to what happened. She began a series of interracial dialogues in the aftermath of the shooting to try to help bridge the divide between black and white and to increase the level of trust between the police and communities of color. Weeks into her attempts, though, she got frustrated as it became apparent that many residents were willing to do the superficial work of handholding, exchanging prayers, and condemning bogeymen like Roof—but were unwilling to dig deeper to unearth and confront darker truths about how life was still being lived in the place where the Civil War began.

Support for Trump has been rationalized as not being about race the same way support for the Confederate flag was long rationalized. Trump votes were a stand against creeping political correctness, or a way to get a pro-life Supreme Court, or a desperate attempt to preserve a shrinking manufacturing industry that Trump vowed to save, or a cry from marginalized white people. It mattered little that fellow residents who happened to be black saw in Trump a man who rose to national political prominence on the bigotry of birtherism and had a history of discriminating against black and brown people in both his private business and public statements.

McIver knows pain that her white neighbors do not.

What the presidential campaign has made clear, above all else, is that the country is awash in pain—some of it real, some of it misplaced. In 2012, a coal power plant a few miles from McIver's house was closed because Santee Cooper, the company that operated it, decided not to spend the money needed to upgrade it to meet new federal regulations. That's just one data point in the long decline of an old economy where you didn't need a high school diploma—and sometimes you didn't even need to know how to read—to make ends meet. South Carolina is a poor, rural state with a growth that was stunted by the Civil War, then a century of Jim Crow laws and societal norms that made it impossible to fully develop its homegrown talent. The decline in the manufacturing industry just made it harder for residents harmed by an under-funded school system that was especially hard for black, brown, and poor white students.

Like many coastal states, South Carolina was hit hard by the real estate crash of 2008. While the market has begun to bounce back, a spate of foreclosures and devalued homes and properties remain. Historic-level floods in consecutive years exposed the state's infrastructure problems, with dozens of dams breached and dozens of roads shut down.

That's economic pain, the sort of pain nearly every American knows. But McIver knows pain that her white neighbors do not. She hurt in 1963—a year after the Confederate flag was thrown up the State House flagpole as a statement against the Civil Rights movement, the first time she was arrested in Charleston protesting Jim Crow. She hurt later, when she and other black kids in 60s Charleston had to abide by a curfew if they wanted to remain safe, when she watched white people in her city leave in droves at the thought of more integration.

She hurt when she got the news of the shooting, when she learned about Roof and heard the echoes of the racist rhetoric of the Ku Klux Klan back in the old days. She was hurt when she found out that Roof had received a meal from Burger King shortly after his arrest. She is hurt every time she hears about another young black man being lost to gun violence, which happens too frequently where we live, two hours north of Charleston, even though we had a black man succeed a black woman as police chief. She has reason to be hurt every time the police shoot a young black man, like they did to Julian Betton in Myrtle Beach about a 20-minute trip from where she lives two months before Roof killed her sister in Charleston. The cops paralyzed Betton, were caught in lies about what happened, and yet have not been charged with any crime.

"When you are on the outside looking in, you don't necessarily see the ills, the problems, the concerns all of the people in a particular community have. You don't see those things," she told me. "But if we who have to live it every day live it, then we know."

McIver, like most black South Carolinians, have had to spend decades ignoring their daily hurt, having to grin and bear the presence of monuments honoring slavery proponents, including a statue of Ben Tillman, a former governor who bragged about lynching black people to gain political power, that sits on the State House grounds. Those have remained even after the flag was removed.

McIver was hurt like the rest of us when video emerged of North Charleston police officer Michael Slager shooting a fleeing Walter Scott in the back just a dozen days after Betton was paralyzed in that Myrtle Beach raid—and when Slager's trial ended with the jury deadlocked over whether that amount of evidence was enough to believe a crime had been committed.

She hurts—but she also forgives.

"If I believe in the word as the scripture says, then I have to forgive," she said. "It still hurts. If we don't portray this front, knowing that forgiveness is the way, what message will we be sending to our children?"

McIver didn't want to talk about politics. But I can't help but compare to her example of choosing forgiveness instead of rage to the white people who turned to Trump in their time of pain. People here admired the selflessness of McIver and some other of the shooting victims' families. Then they turned around and decided to stand with, rather than against, the kind of rhetoric that led to the murder of her sister.

"In Charleston, after the tragedy, the forgiveness from some of the family members unfortunately resulted in white people making the tragedy about them," Marilyn Hemingway told me. "Holding hands across the bridge, painting memorial walls, donating money were means to deal with guilt and not really do the hard work it takes to change our society. The forgiveness statement allowed white people to grab it and use it to deflect blame and disallow real change. What will it take to make permanent, substantial societal change? I don't know."

Follow Issac J. Bailey on Twitter.

The VICE Guide to Right Now: Teens Don't Party Like They Used to, Study Says

$
0
0

Photo via Brooke Hoyer

Following the millennial trend of not taking part in anything fun anymore, teenagers are apparently getting drunk and high way less than previous generations, according to a new Monitoring the Future study from the University of Michigan.

Every year, researchers at the University of Michigan conduct a survey of about 45,000 eighth, tenth, and 12th grade students to understand teen drug use. This year, the study found that the number of teenagers using drugs, drinking, or smoking cigarettes is the lowest it's been since 1990.

Tobacco use specifically has declined sharply in the past two decades—from 11 percent smoking half a pack a day in 1991 to only 1.8 percent in 2016. E-cigarette use is down, too, from 16 percent in 2015 to just 12 percent this year.

Although annual use of marijuana has stayed pretty much the same for tenth and 12th graders, it's been steadily dropping for eighth graders from 11.8 percent in 2015 to 9.4 percent in 2016. Alcohol use and binge drinking have declined for all three grades surveyed, too.

It's not totally clear what's causing the decline, but some researchers think teens are just not going to parties as often as they were before—possibly spending more time on their viral promposal or perfecting their Instagram profile.

"There may be a protective effect brought about by the fact that they don't have so many occasions to get together where the use of drugs would be facilitated," Nora Volko, director of the National Institute of Drug Abuse, told USA Today. "It's wonderful to see, but understanding it will be very important because then we can try to emulate it, be proactive, and try to sustain it."

K-Money Is Here to Make Canadian Politics Great Again for Fuck’s Sake

$
0
0

K-money in his natural habitat. Photo via Twitter

Oh, Canada. It's finally happening. We are finally getting our own Donald Trump.

We have been wailing and gnashing our teeth for a proper homegrown equivalent to the thrillionaire New York supervillain who has stolen America's heart and/or future. Where is our rich asshole famous for playing a rich asshole on television? Where is our CanCon-friendly maverick businessman?

Turns out it's Kevin goddamn O'Leary. K-Money. He's getting ready to dive like Scrooge McDuck into the Conservative leadership race in February. Which means that 2017 is going to be off the chain.

For those of you who don't know him, Kevin O'Leary is a serious business man looking to make some serious business deals that will make some serious fucking money. Fat stacks of scratch. "You got to pay Daddy," he told the Business News Network in 2008. "I need dough and I need dough every month. You got to pay Daddy number one."

Even though he's lived in America forever, he has heard his people cry out from beneath the crushing weight of our totalitarian federal government and he's here to bust us out—with the power of deals.

Have you seen this guy on Dragon's Den? He's the most savvy one. The dude from Boston Pizza is always chucking money at randos with apps like "yeah let's see where this goes" but Kevin is just constantly shutting scrubs down. People with their bad business ideas are crying and Kevin is just sitting in his chair screaming "MONEY DOESN'T CARE ABOUT YOUR FEELINGS, YOUR TEARS ADD NO VALUE" because that's how good he is at deals and not being a sociopath.

Mr. Wonderful on the wonders of wealth inequality

Kevin O'Leary only cares about money. If we put him in charge of all our money, he will be so good with it. He will gently coo sweet lullabies to the money and stroke the money lovingly. Our money will grow up big and strong and self-assured thanks to Daddy.

It will be totally different from that time he tried to start his own mutual fund.

Canada is a sexy money-making machine, but Justin Trudeau doesn't know how to use it. Justin Trudeau has probably never even read Ayn Rand because he was too busy surfing or teaching and that is outrageous. Kevin O'Leary is outraged. Kevin O'Leary is throwing fistfuls of dollars at the wall and jumping up and down on expensive pillows like Yosemite Sam because that is the sort of thing Kevin O'Leary can afford to do when he is outraged.

O'Leary owning himself on 'Jeopardy

Kevin O'Leary is the true outsider that Canada's disenfranchised Conservatives are craving. Kellie Leitch is a phony and Chris Alexander is a coward and Maxime Bernier is a Frenchman. Only Mr. Wonderful can exorcise the evil spirit of Big Government using the TV charm he honed for years on the public broadcaster.

Lots of liberals and leftists will whine that being the prime minister is totally different from running a business or that Canadians are too smart to be taken for a ride by a man famous for yelling investment advice at people on television. These are the same people who said Brexit would never happen and that Trump would never be the president because they were both such transparently bad ideas. Ignore these people. They are out of touch with the new reality.

The declining middle class doesn't give a shit about eggheads or their moralizing. They care about cold, hard cash and sticking it to sanctimonious progressive assholes.

They care about style over substance. Trudeau's got an aristocratic poise but Kevin O'Leary has the raw, gaudy magnetism of new money, which is more compelling than all of the other Conservative candidates rolled together.

So buckle in baby. Daddy's going to get his dough. Let's see how the federal state does in the Shark Tank.

Follow Drew Brown on Twitter for fuck's sake.

The VICE Guide to Right Now: Trump Picks Exxon CEO Rex Tillerson to Be Secretary of State

$
0
0

Photo by Sasha Mordovets/Getty Images

President-elect Trump has named Exxon CEO Rex Tillerson—a guy with no prior government experience—to be the next secretary of state, Politico reports.

As Exxon's top exec, Tillerson seems to have gained the majority of his international experience making business deals abroad and developing close ties to Russia. In 2013, Vladimir Putin gave him the "Order of the Friendship" award, and Exxon currently has major deals in place in Russia that could move forward should the US loosen its sanctions, the New York Times reports.

The Senate still has to approve Tillerson for the top diplomat job and a number of top Republicans have been vocally critical of the pick. Senators John McCain and Marco Rubio have already expressed their concerns about Tillerson's lack of experience and coziness with Russia.

"When he gets the friendship award from a butcher, frankly, it's an issue that I think needs to be examined," McCain told FOX News on Sunday.

Trump and his allies, on the other hand, have defended placing America's foreign interests in the hands of a government outsider.

"It's not like Vladimir Putin and Rex Tillerson are pounding down vodka at the local bar," Kellyanne Conway, a top aide to Trump, told Good Morning America on Monday. So there's that.

Supervised Injection Sites Are on the Way. Here’s What They Look Like Now

$
0
0


Amy Wright. All photos by author

"I can't remember if it was me who was sick first, or if it was him," Amy Wright tells me, describing how she and Robert Quenville—the "one person" who she could rely on while homeless—had both caught a cold one winter. Depending on who was weaker on a given day, the two traded roles in nursing each other back to health.

For Quenville, however, it was not the common cold that would rob him of his health and eventually his life.

"I'm certain—90 percent sure, actually—if supervised injection sites were around when he was, he would not be dead."

The place Wright and I spoke at, an alleyway just a few hundred feet from the entrance of Toronto's St. Michael's Hospital, used to be where Quenneville would sleep and sometimes inject drugs. That day, the passageway was largely empty, kept in company by only the light patter of rain and a handful of restaurant employees on their smoke break.

At one point, both Wright and Quenville were heavily-addicted to opiate drugs. The two had met while on the streets of Vancouver's Downtown Eastside in the summer of 2009, and, due to proximity, were both regular users of Insite (the city's first and and at one point only supervised injection site). After Wright's brother died from an overdose, Wright moved back to Toronto in 2011 to help get herself clean. By the end of the year, Quenville had—like the drugs—disappeared from her life.

Yet Wright would run into him again, this time as an outreach worker. In Toronto, Quenville was still using, but he wasn't coping as well as he had in Vancouver. He spent most nights on the street, stuffed into that same alleyway. Due to the city's affordable housing crises and lack of access to shelter beds, Wright says this is a common problem for Toronto's homeless.

The exact spot where Wright says Quenville used to sleep.

On top of being unable to find a bed to sleep in, Quenville had zero access to supervised injection services like he had in Vancouver. Instead, like many of the city's opiate-using individuals, Quenville would inject drugs inside coffee shop bathrooms or in public, oftentimes being kicked out or harassed by people who felt uncomfortable with the sight.

On August 1st, 2015, Quenville collapsed from an overdose on the northwest corner of Queen St. E. and Jarvis St.—a five-second walk across the road from Fred Victor House. Aside from Wright's memory of him, the only public trace of Quenville's existence in Toronto is his name, which can be found on the unofficial memorial list for Toronto's homeless.

In June, Toronto's health officials and city councillors came together on a formal agreement to greenlight the proposal for three separate supervised injection sites in the downtown core. Without federal approval, however, the sites have sat in limbo.

On Monday, after months of deliberation and a report from medical experts on how to combat the opiate crisis, federal Minister of Health Jane Philpott announced Bill C-37: legislation slated to amend the Controlled Drugs and Substances Act so supervised injection sites can be opened with much greater ease.

Currently, under Bill C-2, the federal government—in conjunction with local and regional police, and numerous political agencies—must give a case-by-case exemption to any location trying to give drug-using individuals the ability to inject illegal drugs under the care of medical professionals.

"I've made it very clear to my department that there should be no unnecessary barriers for communities who want to open supervised consumption sites," Philpott said in a September question period in the House of Commons.

"Clearly, it's important that this is done right."

A vial of naloxone, the drug used to stop an opioid overdose. Naloxone is one of the main pillars that harm reduction workers use in helping prevent fatal overdose at safe injection centres.

Still, some say that by having it "done right," the process has been slow—too slow. In fact, debate over how to "properly" go forward with supervised injections sites stems back into the early 2000s, with Insite being a catalyst for much of the dialogue found in discussions about harm reduction today.

Even with the new law, safe injection sites will still need to obtain funding from their respective provincial health agencies—a process that could prove difficult in provinces that have, unlike BC, not yet tested a successful model that could be used as precedent.

As of December 2016, the only two supervised injection sites that are both federally and municipally-approved to operate are Vancouver's Insite and Dr. Peter Centre. The next proposed sites within striking range of federal approval are located in Montreal and Ottawa, but both have yet to get the final thumbs up.

In September, VICE reported on a back alley supervised injection site in Vancouver that was operating without the city's approval. Along with the few who defy federal law by working there, the site operates on a bare bones setup—a tent, some tables, clean injectable tools, and the overdose antidote naloxone.More recently,

By October, the City of Vancouver had formally acknowledged the site's presence and agreed to, with the guidance of police, "assess the risk of the unsanctioned overdose management site." Regardless of what that may mean for the future of the site, co-founder of the site Sarah Blyth told VICE that this is just the beginning of DIY sites in North America.

"Someone from Boston just contacted me," Blyth said. "They want to get a tent set up as soon as possible—they're having five to six people dying a day in Boston."

The three proposed supervised injection sites in Toronto.

Back in Toronto, Shaun Hopkins is the manager of The Works: the city's official needle exchange program and harm reduction agency. The Works' headquarters, located at the Toronto Public Health offices, which sit on the edge of the Ryerson University campus, is one of the three proposed spots that the city's board of health has designated as a space suitable for being a supervised injection site—the other two being in the Queen West-Central Toronto Community Health Centre, and South Riverdale Community Health Centre.

Hopkins, who's been working at the facility for 25 years, said she's happy there has been a shift in the attitude toward safe injection centres—especially now that Toronto's city council, which voted almost unanimously in favour of the sites.

Still, Hopkins notes that there has and continues to be a big price to pay in having to wait on Ottawa's blessing, and told me that whatever comes of that wait should be bigger in scope than just a series of one-off exemptions.

"I hope that these three initial places are just that—three initial places," Hopkins told me behind the curtains of a makeshift interview room at the Works. "There has to be a comprehensive strategy. I mean, that's why we're doing this—to save lives, and to have people inside where we are. That way, if they do overdose, there's help."

Across the country, there has been a steady and alarming rise in overdose deaths. In Alberta and British Columbia, the increasing presence of fentanyl has ravaged the opiate-using population, contributing to hundreds of deaths per year in each province. In Ontario, over 5,000 people died from opiate overdose between 2000 and 2013. Since then, fentanyl has now become the number one cause of opiate-related overdose death in Ontario—killing 162 in 2015, up from just 86 in 2010.

Yet, beyond federal limitations, there's even opposition to supervised injection sites being set up at a local level. During the debate to have Toronto's own locations greenlit, three city councilors opposed the recommendation to set up the sites put forward by the board of health.

"Using drugs is illegal and I don't know why we set up a facility where we allow that to happen under our supervision," said Coun. Stephen Holyday at the final council vote for the supervise injection plan, according to the Toronto Star. "n some ways, it's an enabler."

Coun. Giorgio Mammoliti, a local politician who is notorious for going on absurd tirades and pushing polarized issues city hall, took issue with the plan for Toronto's safe injection sites. He argued it would be inappropriate to have locations, like the Works, so close to businesses and schools, and told VICE that he would fight the establishment of supervised injection sites "tooth and nail."

In 2011, Wright's brother Brad died from an overdose. At the time, Wright was a regular opiate user and had been since she was prescribed percocets for a sports injury while in university. That habit eventually developed into heroin use, and she found herself homeless not long after. Unlike Wright, who overdosed on a number of occasions and managed to survive each time, it only took Brad three weeks of opiate use before he died from an overdose."

The experience "shook , more than anything had before." Within a week, she hopped on a Greyhound charted from Vancouver to Toronto, detoxed herself of drugs, and found a place to live in the city. 2016 marked her fifth year of sobriety, and now, Wright sits on Toronto's planning committee for the formulation of its supervised injection strategy. She says that her job is a reminder to what could have been.

"It's a definitely a reminder of where my life could be, where it could go again. I see the struggle that people who use heroin go through and I can feel it," she said. "I know my brother in a sense gave me a gift, and I know it could have taken me down a another road."

Follow Jake Kivanc on Twitter.

What It's Like to Photograph Everyone from MLK to Trump

$
0
0

Donald Trump at the Taj Mahal in 1990. Photo by Harry Benson. Courtesy of Magnolia Pictures

Harry Benson has enough photos of President-Elect Donald J. Trump that he could probably release a book on him. These images, some of which can be found in Matthew Miele and Justin Bare's new documentary, Harry Benson: Shoot First, are the product of a 40-year-working relationship between the legendary photographer and the soon-to-be president.

"I've known the bastard 40 years," the 87-year-old Benson recently told me, sitting in his artsy, light-filled Upper West Side apartment. "He's still the same show-off." Benson would know. In the film, Benson shoots Trump in 1990 holding a stack of a million dollars, pulled from his Atlantic City casinos. And Trump isn't the only important figure in American history to get the Harry Benson treatment; members of the Ku Klux Klan also feature in the photojournalist's work. "I was taken in by the Imperial Wizard, and that helps," Benson said, explaining how he became so deeply embedded in Carolina Klan country that he was able to shoot rallies. "It was a man by the name of Bobby Shelton."

KKK mother and child. Photo by Harry Benson. Courtesy of Magnolia Pictures

When I bring it up, the Glasgow, Scotland-born photographer tells me he has "no desire" to shoot the president-elect, which will make Trump the first president since Eisenhower that Benson hasn't shot while in office. Similarly, he's also had enough of shooting the Klan. "I don't have to be so ambitious anymore," he said. "I'm an old man."

Though outwardly self-depreciating, Benson was certainly ambitious in his younger days, having shot everyone from the Beatles to Muhammad Ali, Greta Garbo to Mike Tyson; he also embedded with the IRA and for wartime assignments in Bosnia and Iraq. A cover photo he shot of Ronald and Nancy Reagan dancing in a studio for Vanity Fair was even credited with saving the publication from the chopping block.

Benson shot the Beatles' first stateside trip, and he also shot Jack Nicholson on the side of the highway in Aspen with a bit of white powder still in his nose. His camera captured national tragedies, such as the 1968 assassination of Senator Robert F. Kennedy, and quieter moments like the famously reclusive Greta Garbo as she swam in Antigua. All of this is shown and given context in the film by the likes of Trump himself, RFK's daughter, Kerry Kennedy, Dan Rather, Sharon Stone, Piers Morgan, and more.

Ethel Kennedy, shortly after Robert F. Kennedy's assassination in 1968. Photo by Harry Benson. Courtesy of Magnolia Pictures

"I wasn't going to go to the Ambassador Hotel because I knew Bobby had won," Benson said of the post-assassination shots. "I go there, and Bobby makes a speech at the hotel. I try to leave, but it's a crowded ballroom, so I try to figure out which way to go. I'm accredited, so I get behind Bobby, and we're walking out through the kitchen. I turn to go one way and a girl screams—she was a Kennedy—and right away I knew what it was." That wasn't the only time Benson shot in the aftermath of a murder—he also shot Martin Luther King Jr.'s funeral, following his assassination that same year. "I had the ability to leave my emotions behind me," Benson explains in the film.

But for someone so comfortable behind the lens, Benson was hesitant about being the subject of a film: "I don't really think I'm that good at shooting photographs," Benson said. "It was awkward. I had to fight through it because I'm used to photographing people, and I can see sometimes how stupid and awkward I look."

Harry Benson. Photo courtesy of Magnolia Pictures

For Bare and Miele, the decision to make Shoot First came in the middle of another project: While working on a film for Tiffany and Company, the pair were put in touch with the photographer. "After about ten minutes, we realized this guy was off the charts in terms of who he is in terms of photography," Miele said. "He was being modest. He didn't mention much, but as you're talking to him in his apartment, there are all these images around you." Indeed: When I visited Benson's apartment, there was a room where every wall was covered with large-size photographs, the subjects ranging from Andy Warhol to two random lovers making out at a bar.

Many of these images make it into Shoot First, and piles more sit in oversize boxes. They're all organized by his wife, Gigi, who's also his business manager. Each time he unearthed a box of new photos during my visit, Gigi—either of her own volition or at Harry's request—would tidy up behind him when he was done.

Martin Luther King Jr. in Canton, Mississippi, in 1966. Photo by Harry Benson. Courtesy of Magnolia Pictures

"We wanted to represent every decade that he was working," Miele told me of the film's final edit, which took about a year to finish. The result is extensive, and wide-ranging: Images of Jacqueline Kennedy flash onscreen, along with a scene about photographing Michael Jackson and how Benson knew, upon entering his bedroom, that the resulting photos—which featured a life-size boy scout statue as well as an enormous gilded throne—would be "weird."

Michael Jackson at the Neverland Ranch in California in 1997. Photo by Harry Benson. Courtesy of Magnolia Pictures

The color and action with which Bare and Miele fill Shoot First are indicative of Benson's work, which will see him earn the 2017 Infinity Award for Lifetime Achievement from the International Center of Photography.

Kate Moss in Paris in 1993. Photo by Harry Benson. Courtesy of Magnolia Pictures

There isn't much that Harry Benson won't shoot, although he did admit to me that he would never take an assignment where animals were being harmed due to humans. For him, as long as he's on the assignment, he will shoot first and leave editing and deciding what to run to someone else.

"People ask me if I have nightmares for taking it," Benson said of those heart-wrenching shots of Kennedy's last moments, his wife, Ethel, holding up her hand to block the camera's view. "But I would have had nightmares if I hadn't have taken it."

Follow Mikelle Street on Twitter.

Harry Benson: Shoot First is now in theaters and available online.


The VICE Guide to Right Now: The Pizzagate Shooter Could Face Up to Ten Years in Prison

$
0
0

Edgar Maddison Welch surrenders to police in DC. Photo by Sathi Soma via AP

On Tuesday, federal prosecutors announced that the man behind the Comet Ping Pong shooting will be charged with interstate transportation of a firearm with intent to commit a crime, the AP reports.

Edgar Maddison Welch turned himself into police on December 4 after storming into the DC pizzeria with a military-grade assault rifle to investigate an online conspiracy theory known as "Pizzagate."

Since the WikiLeaks email hack of top Clinton aide John Podesta, fake news sites and chat forums have contributed to speculation that Comet Ping Pong was actually a front for a child sex ring associated with top Democrats. The 28-year-old reportedly told police that he drove six hours from his home in Salisbury, North Carolina, because "he had read online that the Comet restaurant was harboring child sex slaves and that he wanted to see for himself if they were there."

He then fired his gun inside, managing not to injure anyone, before leaving "when he found no evidence that underage children were being harbored in the restaurant," according to police.

The local charges against Welch have since been dropped, but he now could face a maximum prison sentence of ten years behind bars or have to pay a fine due to the federal charge. William Miller, a spokesperson for the US District Attorney's office in DC, told Politico that Welch's hearing could happen as soon as Tuesday afternoon.

My Year in Productivity While Microdosing

$
0
0


Photo via Flickr user R

Accomplishing things is hard and boring, and novel-writing, which is what I spend a lot of my time doing, is harder and more boring and more noble than any other human activity. So in 2016 I experimented with microdosing to try to make writing easier and less boring and less noble.

Why do I microdose? Well, microdosing in Silicon Valley is apparently a thing, a Dutch man said psychedelics are "like the coffee to wake up the mind-body connection," and artists apparently make breakthroughs while doing microdosing. LSD seems to be the most common drug to microdose, but I didn't have any, so this year experimented with 2C-B, mushrooms, Focalin (ADHD drug), weed, and Heineken.

There's a whole system for microdosing, as outlined by this guy James Fadiman, that basically comes down to doing the drug every four days, but I didn't know any of that, so I just winged it.

Here's what happened in my year of microdosing:

MUSHROOMS

I didn't measure quantities, but I was most systematic with psilocybin mushrooms. I started with a little twig of stem. It was about 10 PM. I started to feel good, got a little energy boost. I posted to Facebook that the government should make everyone do mushrooms and think about love. I did no work.

After that I did it while working in my friend's kitchen. I would go over there at noon and we would listen to Kanye for five minutes and then open our laptops. Whenever I felt like it, I would eat a small amount of stem and a little bit of cap, and then take a picture of it, to have a record.

In the beginning I barely felt high at all, which, I learned while researching this article, is how it's supposed to be. In fact, the Fadiman microdosing idea is to do so little you don't actually feel anything—you just notice, afterwards, that you've been extra productive.

My aim was different. I wanted the work itself to feel like a magic carpet ride through a hackerspace of green glowing numbers, so I kept upping the dose every day. Near the end of the first week, when my friend and I went out to get our mid-afternoon coffee, I found that, while I wasn't exactly hallucinating, light sources were notably compelling. Within another day or two, all objects—people's faces, the lettering on signs, my shoes—were extremely interesting, and the sum total of stimulus in a ten foot radius at any moment seemed like a miraculous and slightly holy amount of information. I was at about 0.3-0.4 grams a day at this point, and, though I wouldn't say my productivity had improved, it certainly hadn't degraded.

This became untrue when my dosage climbed to about 0.6-0.7 grams. (Again, these were eyeball estimates.) At this dosage the texture of reality started to subtly throb, and it was too distracting to work. The last day of the experiment, my friend was out of town. I ate the little chunks of scrotal bark and biked through everyone else's business day and wrote in a park. I got overwhelmed though by an impossibly nondescript couple sitting on a bench across from me, and the sun reflecting off the buildings was exceeding my capacity for beauty, and I felt hungrier than the time I fasted for two days. I biked to a pizza place and ate pizza for six hours and watched teenagers watch soccer on TV. I got no work done that day and that was the end of mushrooms.

Conclusion: Not sure if microdosing mushrooms helps productivity, but it doesn't seem to hurt it, and, in the 0.3-0.4 gram range, makes your day more fun.


2C-B

2C-B (2,5-dimethoxy-4-bromophenethylamine, a.k.a. "Nexus"), marketed as an aphrodisiac ("Erox"), is one of the many phenethylamines Alexander Shulgin synthesized for the first time in the 70s and, with his wife Ann, wrote about in a book called Phenethylamines I Have Known And Loved. 2C-B is described as a cross between acid and MDMA, because it is both a psychedelic (makes shit weird) and an empathogen-entactogen (makes you feel connected to people). It is also, according to sketchy-seeming butsubstantiated drug sites, an entheogen (makes you feel religious). I chose this drug to microdose because it seemed close enough to acid to possibly work the same way, and it was available. I did it three times.

I was not systematic with 2C-B. I ingested a tiny, random amount of the white powder when I first got the pills. I was in a bad, weird mood, and I tried to work, but instead I jogged around my neighbourhood shooting lasers at pedestrians with my eyes. I felt confused and upset and tweeted (since deleted) "breaking discovery: you can actually jog in a fetal position."

Second time was a slightly larger amount. I felt nothing and decided my first experience had been placebo. I worked normally although at one point I had a problem remembering what number comes after 11.

The third time I did it I did a "full" amount (about 20 mg) with a friend. Strictly speaking this was unrelated to the microdosing experiment, but, just FYI: 2C-B is a fascinating, unusual drug, in that you're high as shit (I'd rate my experience a "plus three" on the Shulgin Rating Scale), but you feel completely in control, and can talk about complicated things with an only slightly diminished capacity for nuance. My friend and I decided it was like being a sober person in a high person's body—or more specifically, having a sober person's consciousness with a high person's perceptions. I lost awareness of my body for a while, for example, but I felt calm about it.

Conclusion: Too few trials to know. Further research needed.

READ MORE: This Is What It Feels Like to Treat Depression with Magic Mushrooms

FOCALIN

Focalin (dexmethylphenidate—also, as it happens, a phenethylamine), is a central nervous system stimulant, like Ritalin or Adderall, and so is already good at helping you work. Tbh, it's a perfect productivity drug. I recently wrote a 4,000-word screenplay outline in a single sitting while on it, and at high doses it induces euphoria, so there's really nothing to not like about it. But I do worry it's turning my brain, liver, and kidneys into pink slime, so the purpose of microdosing Focalin was to see how little I could ingest while still getting its effects.

For this reason, I started with a full dose and gradually decreased. A 20 mg Focalin capsule contains about 100 tiny little white spheres, so you can adjust your dosage by only ingesting some of these spheres.

Long story short, there were no interesting effects of lower doses. With fewer spheres, I just got shittier at working. In fact, if you go too low, you get no productivity boost at all, and instead you just get the side effects, which in my experience are: irritability, flattening of the emotions, decreased empathy, incinerated sense of humour, wholesale destruction of social skills, and, sometimes, anhedonia (i.e. inability to feel pleasure).

Conclusion: Microdosing for the purpose of productivity a drug whose purpose at regular doses is productivity is as nonsensical as it sounds.

MARIJUANA

Mother Juan was actually the start of my "microdosing experience," back in January, although it didn't start off as a productivity thing—I thought it would help me sleep. Nah, though. Even though I was smoking tiny amounts—microdosing?—weed affects me super strongly, and instead of falling asleep, my mind would start racing, and I would write pages and pages of scattered thoughts on feelings regarding my family, nuanced regrets over a random classmate from high school, and, once, a 2,000-word exegesis on how a single page of a graphic novel mirrored my most recent breakup.

Conclusion: The drug had the desired effect of making me write, and in fact I wrote the most number of words on this drug, but total word count is not actually my goal. Due to the lack of control, marijuana seems bad as a productivity drug, although it seems possible that lack of control could be useful during some stages of some projects.

ALCOHOL

You may laugh, but Malcolm Gladwell wrote a compelling essay suggesting that, counterintuitively, alcohol's main effect is making you focus on what's in front you. So maybe, I thought, under the proper conditions, alcohol could be a productivity drug.

I bought two cases of those little 200 mL bottles of Heineken, and for about a month I downed one first thing in the morning (it was especially helpful for this experiment that I have absolutely no tendency toward addiction).

Now, alcohol and writing is a classic combination, but that may be more due to alcohol being a convenient painkiller for an anguish-stained lifestyle than with any literary-enhancing properties of the substance. In fact, I had positive experiences writing drunk—I could retain much more control than with weed, for example, and I often had access to a wider range of my own personality than I normally do.

However, writing things I didn't want to write while drunk didn't work so well. At one point I tried to work on a complicated essay I'd lost interest in, and I got melodramatic and self-pitying and rage-y and kicked my chair over like a trapped monkey.

Conclusion: Like marijuana, alcohol can be helpful in a very specific way, but overall is garbage as a productivity aide.

GENERAL CONCLUSION

My experiments were totally unsystematic and I have no real recommendations or conclusions. It was mainly fun to experiment with how different substances affected me independent of their traditional social contexts. If you're looking for more information on drugs actually intended for productivity, this is a pretty good overview.

What Do You Do with Your Grandfather’s Genuine Nazi Flag?

$
0
0


All photos courtesy of the author

Holding a Nazi flag in your hands for the first time is a surreal experience. The evil it represents and all the hate perpetrated under the banner of the swastika hits you like a punch to the gut.

The first time I saw and held one of these flags was the winter of 2008. My grandfather, who had been a paratrooper in the Second World War, had recently died and my father and I were going through some of his things, saving what we could from my grandmother's desire to throw everything she could into the wood furnace in the basement.

"Have you ever seen his Nazi flag?" my father asked abruptly as we were looking through some old photos. I guess there is no gentle lead up to such a loaded question.

No. I hadn't seen it. And yes, I wanted to.

We walked into the guest room and my dad opened the closet door, then reached up to the top shelf, moved a few boxes aside and grabbed an old grocery bag. He pulled out a red mass of fabric, then slowly unfolded it, revealing the now infamous red, white and black flag.

The author's grandfather sits in a Spitfire cockpit in England.

I studied history while at university and had seen countless images of the flag in old photographs, movies and newspaper articles. The distinctive black swastika on a white circle, centred on a red background is unmistakable.

Yet here it was, a symbol of fear and hatred, just spread out on the carpet.

What the hell?

In the spring of 1945, the Allied forces were squeezing Adolf Hitler and the Third Reich from all directions. The Russians were pushing from the east, while Britain and its allies moved in from the west. The 1st Canadian Parachute Battalion, an elite group of soldiers first created to help defend Canadian soil, but then deployed overseas to take part in the liberation of Europe starting on D-Day, led the spearhead into Germany.

Among them was Pvt. Thomas Jackson, my grandfather, just a few months short of his 22nd birthday.

The battalion was part of the 6th British Airborne Division and their mission was to march northeast to the port town of Wismar, on the Baltic Sea, and prevent German soldiers or officers from retreating into Norway and Denmark. They also had orders to reach the town before the Russians.

On May 2, 1945 at around 9AM, the battalion marched in Wismar, beating the Russians by just a few hours.

The Germans were actually somewhat pleased to see the British and Canadian forces. They knew the war was a lost cause and were worried what might happen to them if the Russians seized the town first.

An estimated 15,000 German soldiers and civilians surrendered to the British force over the next few days, and the pile of confiscated weapons allegedly grew to be 10 feet high and 25 feet long.

I can only imagine the relief young men like my grandfather must have felt to learn the war might soon be over after nearly six years of fighting. The official battalion war diary even states that on May 7, after the unconditional surrender of Germany, "the gin, whiskey, vodka, wine schnapps flowed, and everybody had a grand time acquiring the inevitable hangover."

As for the flag, the story goes that it was hanging inside the Rathaus (city hall) of Wismar and my grandfather was the first person inside the building after the city was captured. The swastika is only on one side of the flag, and there are metal loops at each corner, suggesting it was hung up on a wall.

No doubt grandpa took it as a memento of the war and the friends he lost overseas.

More than six decades have passed since that drunken night when they celebrated the end of the war in Europe, and with grandpa now gone, we're left asking ourselves what the rest of the family should do with an old Nazi flag.

At this point do I need to include the disclaimer that no one in my family is a Nazi? OK fine, none of my family members are Nazis.


The author's grandfather pictured on the far right side holding a glass and smiling at a pub in England just before June D-Day assault, 1944.

The flag itself is in poor condition and has an odd smell that's hard to describe—almost sour. It's also covered in stains and smears, and there's a tear in the material where a black liquid (motor oil perhaps?) was spilled and weakened the fabric.

My dad said the first time he saw it was when he was about 15 years old. He was rummaging through grandpa's drawer looking for a work shirt and found it, along with a dismantled German luger handgun he also brought home from the war. There's something fitting about the fact it spent years folded up so close to my grandpa's underwear and socks.

"I never really thought of it as a war prize," my dad said. "It was just always there, tucked away in a drawer.

"To me it is just something my dad found at an opportune moment and stuffed in his pack before the commanding officers, diplomats or diehard Nazis could claim it."

The way I see it is we're left with three options: A. Keep it in a drawer somewhere, B. sell it to a collector (or donate it to a museum), or C. destroy it.

READ MORE: Collecting Nazi Junk at German Flea Markets Made Me a Better Person

The first option of putting it in a drawer or on a shelf somewhere is perhaps the easiest, and it would be out of sight and out of mind. But then what's the point of keeping it at all? Just for the sake of having it? The arguments for keeping it (such as educating future generations about the horrors of Nazism) are moot if it just collects dust in the basement.

The second option of selling it is fraught with controversy and has generated strong debate among historians, scholars and the public. The range of Nazi-related items available for sale is astounding, from knives and raincoats to unopened rolls of toilet paper.

eBay has a lengthy list of Nazi-related items it will not allow to be sold (stamps, letters and currency = ok; uniforms, weapons or other items bearing Nazi symbols = banned. Not even Olympic medals from the 1936 Berlin games are allowed).

Over at Amazon, the online store has had a recurring issue with Nazi paraphernalia over the years. A quick search for the terms Nazi or swastika leads to plenty of results, including rings and coins.

B'nai B'rith, the oldest Jewish service organization in the world, has spent years asking Amazon to remove Nazi materials from their website. The Canadian branch of the organization even has an online petition with nearly 700 signatures, yet the materials remain relatively easy to find.

Even the small farming community of St. Jacobs, about an hour west of Toronto, was embroiled in some controversy in the summer of 2015 when the public complained about the sale of Nazi war antiques at a local consignment antique shop, including cuff links, flags and documents signed by Hitler himself.

Landlord Marcus Shantz told the local newspaper, the Waterloo Region Record, the store halted the sale of those items following the complaints.

"These artifacts are hateful symbols and we do not wish to encourage their sale," he said. "My personal view is that the only place this kind of item should be displayed is in a museum where they can be interpreted appropriately."

And that is the crux of the argument for why many believe Nazi items shouldn't be stuffed away in a closet somewhere and forgotten. They're a part of history, and if we bury them we risk forgetting those who died or, perhaps even worse, we risk repeating it.

Apply that logic to my family's flag, however, and the argument loses steam. I doubt any museum would be interested in it given the poor condition. Besides, I'm sure millions of flags were made throughout the 1930s and 40s, so do we really need one more Nazi flag in a museum?

In November, the Virginia Holocaust Museum reported a significant uptick in requests from families to donate Nazi-related memorabilia since the last US election, and the institution has reached a "saturation point" for Nazi artifacts.

That brings me to the third option—destroying it—and I'm surprisingly conflicted by this idea.

The crimes committed by the Nazis are indescribable and continue to horrify to this day. Millions were murdered, tortured, experimented on and starved. Yet, I'm reminded of the dangers of forgetting our past. If I destroy this flag, am I playing a small role in erasing the record of what Hitler did? It's an unsettling question.

And the harsh rhetoric that came out of the United States during this most recent presidential election has reminded the world that Nazis, white supremacists and other vile human beings still exist. And they've been emboldened by some of the race-baiting comments that became the norm over the past year or so.

Now more than ever we need to remind ourselves we're only 70 years removed from Hitler's tyranny. That's less than one lifetime.

So what are we to do?

"I think we should just roll it up in a cotton sheet and bring it out once in awhile when we tell our descendents about their family history," my dad said.

Maybe he's right. We still have grandpa's medals and photos from his time overseas, but the flag is different.

I have no doubt that taking the flag down from the wall filled him with some form of pride and I can just imagine a smile crossing his face as he did it, knowing the war with Germany was finally coming to a close.

And as the years turned into decades, whenever he reached into his drawer to grab a clean shirt and caught a glimpse of the red, white and black flag, I'm sure those memories came flooding back.

Perhaps we owe it to him to hold on to it for just a little bit longer.

How Web Series Have Widened TV's Talent Pool

$
0
0

In 2010, Comedy Central put Workaholics into development after executive Walter Newman saw a series of comedy videos posted on YouTube by Mail Order Comedy, a sketch group starring Adam DeVine, Blake Anderson, and Anders Holm. Drawing on the same fast and loose humor of their sketches, DeVine, Anderson, and Holm worked with Comedy Central to mold their comedy into the more structured and narrative form of Workaholics, now in its seventh and final season.

Three years later, Comedy Central brought the hilarious and strange Funny or Die web series Drunk History to television. Shortly after, Broad City premiered on Comedy Central. The scripted comedy about two best friends vaping and zig-zagging their way through life in New York City became a quick critical smash. But it didn't come out of nowhere. Co-creators and stars Abbi Jacobson and Ilana Glazer independently produced Broad City as a short-form web series from 2009 to 2011, working their connections in the improv world of Upright Citizens Brigade to land top-notch talent despite working on a shoestring budget.

"They were cajoling people to do that web series for nothing, unless you count bagels," Comedy Central president Kent Alterman joked. Amy Poehler appeared in the web series and then went on to become an executive producer of the TV series.

For networks, the appeal of picking up an existing web series seems obvious: The project comes with a built-in fan base. It's tested material. But at Comedy Central, that's not really the focus. As Alterman explained, it's less about views and more about the individuals. With Broad City, Glazer and Jacobson brought talent, ambition, and work ethic. "It's easy to take a risk with them," Alterman said. "Not only are they funny, but they're smart as shit. Their producorial minds were as compelling to us as their on-screen talent."

Original comedy made for the web has expanded Comedy Central's talent pool. In addition to looking for talent in live sketch and stand-up shows, the network set its sights on YouTube, Funny or Die, and other online video platforms for comedy that it could turn into something bigger. The decision to bring the oddball Funny or Die series Drunk History to the network was built on the same foundation as the Broad City pickup: talent and ideas. Jeremy Konner and Derek Waters had a clear vision for their show. Alterman said they not only seemed to have a strong grasp on how a pilot for the series would go but also what the show might look like in later seasons.

Alia Shawkat as Alexander Hamilton in 'Drunk History.' Courtesy of Comedy Central

As Derek Waters put it, Drunk History—a show in which people drunkenly attempt to retell stories from history that are then played out by reenactors lip-dubbing the drunken ramblings—would have been a tough concept to pitch without having anything to show for it. "I don't think I would have been able to sell the show if I didn't have it online," Waters told me on the phone. "It's not an idea that you can really explain. You have to show what the hell you're talking about." From the creator perspective, making a web series can provide a more tangible, developed pitch. When Waters started out making Drunk History for Funny or Die, he just went to his friends and asked them what story from history they think needs to be told. He let them choose their own stories and do their own research. Every episode featured just one retelling. At Comedy Central, Drunk History has a whole team of researchers, and Waters has to be more selective about the stories they tell, building three-act episodes around themes and places.

Now in its fourth season on Comedy Central, Drunk History has managed to evolve into something greater while maintaining the core elements that originally made it compelling. The show nabbed Lin-Manuel Miranda for a Hamilton-centric episode and added an onslaught of notable guests to its roster, including Taylor Schilling, Elizabeth Olsen, Billie Joe Armstrong, Ben Folds, and even pro-fighter-turned-actress Ronda Rousey.

Drunk History's transition from web to television, however, wasn't without its difficulties: "There were times when they didn't want the name to be Drunk History ," Waters said. "I still can't believe we got away with it, having the word 'drunk' on television, but I'm a stubborn comedy snob and refused to change the title, and I'm very thankful that they trusted it." But it kept its name, and it kept its signature look, too. The intentionally low-budget aesthetic of the reenactments didn't become more polished when the show jumped to television. If anything, a bigger budget just meant the show could build better bad set pieces, buy more bad wigs, and get trickier with the editing magic.

By focusing on creators who are writer-producer-actor triple threats, Comedy Central ensures that it's bringing in people who know their ideas inside out

Comedy Central's trust in its creators' visions allowed Drunk History, Workaholics, and Broad City to transition from web shorts into longer-form television series with bigger budgets—but without losing their initial appeal. By focusing on creators who are writer-producer-actor triple threats, Comedy Central ensures that it's bringing in people who know their ideas inside out. Broad City 's webisodes provided a clear and concise summary of what Glazer and Jacobson offered on and off camera; Drunk History 's online shorts showed off the subtle structure and organization Waters and Konner put behind their seemingly sloppy show; Mail Order Comedy sold the Workaholics team as the brash weirdos they are.

Since Broad City, Comedy Central has become a leading force in multi-platform development and online innovation. The network not only looks to the web for new talent, but also develops in-house projects online with the eventual goal of transitioning them to the "linear lineup," dressed-up network-speak for "television." Scripted buddy comedy series Idiotsitter and Ari Shaffir's storytelling show This Is Not Happening both premiered on the network's digital platform before moving to television.

Jillian Bell and Charlotte Newhouse in 'Idiotsitter. Courtesy of Comedy Central

Developed under CC: Studios (originally the network's separate digital production studio before all digital and multi-platform content was folded into the rest of Comedy Central's development team), Idiotsitter is created and written by its stars, Charlotte Newhouse and Workaholics' Jillian Bell. Like Glazer and Jacobson, they came up in the improv world together, and the show, which returns for its second season in 2017, thrives on their chemistry. Again, the network invested in the individuals. Newhouse and Bell admitted that one of the challenges in transitioning from making the Idiotsitter shorts on the web to making the more traditionally structured series was that it wasn't just the two of them anymore. "We had great writers for our first season, but also, Charlotte and I share a brain," Bell explained.

The transition from online to television meant more writers, a longer production period, and just overall more pieces to figure out. The internet remains a place for experimentation and risks, and both Newhouse and Bell noted that they were able to get away with a bit more on the web. Transitioning to television involved reeling in some of the show's wackiness and making sure that their story was more grounded. But as with Broad City, Comedy Central made it a priority to preserve what made the show great in the first place: the interplay between its leads. Even with changes to the creative process, Idiotsitter's new home in the linear lineup didn't radically change the show's core.

Some networks use social media to engage with viewers of their existing shows, but Comedy Central is taking its social media initiatives one step further by using social platforms to develop new series.

Social media also presents new avenues for web-to-television development. Some networks use social media to engage with viewers of their existing shows, but Comedy Central is taking its social media initiatives one step further by using social platforms to develop new series. A script deal born from a Snapchat series sounds like a bad joke about Peak TV gone too far, but Comedy Central has turned it into a reality, ordering a new TV show starring comedian James Davis, who is also creator and executive producer. The new series is based on Swag-A-Saurus, Davis's Snapchat series where he breaks down modern slang. We can expect more of that innovation soon, according to Alterman, who said Comedy Central is now focusing more on how to tailor content to specific platforms—like Snapchat and Instagram—and seeing where it goes from there.

Other networks are following suit and also looking to the web for new series and talent. The CW has used its separate streaming service, CW Seed, to debut web series like Husbands. The romantic comedy was independently produced for two seasons and aired via web syndication on YouTube, Roku, Blip, and other online platforms before CW Seed produced a six-episode third season. CW Seed has also debuted original digital series like I Ship It and the DC universe extension series Vixen. But so far, the network has kept CW Seed completely separate from CW proper, opting not to marry its online content with its linear lineup. The CW's Crazy Ex-Girlfriend, however, does have roots online: Rachel Bloom's musical shorts for YouTube are every bit as hilarious and biting as her series, an early glimpse at how well she meshes her musical talent with her specific sense of humor.

Hannibal Burress and Ben Sinclair in 'High Maintenance.' Courtesy of HBO

Another network, HBO, has taken the plunge into plucking series from the web. In 2015, HBO picked up High Maintenance, another weed-infused web series set in New York City. Created by Ben Sinclair and Katja Blichfeld, High Maintenance released 19 shorts on Vimeo from 2012 to 2015. Sinclair and Blichfeld mined the New York talent pool for impressive emerging actors and managed to make High Maintenance for less than $1,000 per episode. The six-episode season that aired on HBO this fall featured longer self-contained stories, but it held onto the show's dreamy, organic essence.

As with Comedy Central, at HBO, it's all about the talent. In fact, according to Nina Rosenstein, executive vice president of HBO Programming, HBO doesn't distinguish between web series and non-web series. "Like all our programming decisions, we are looking for a distinct point of view and a good story," Rosenstein explained in an email to me. "Though it originated as a web series, I feel High Maintenance delivers on HBO's implicit promise of giving our subscribers something you can't see anywhere else. The bet was really on Ben and Katja and that bet paid off."

Unlike Comedy Central, HBO has the benefit of being a premium-television network that doesn't have to adhere to strict time constraints to accommodate commercials. Whereas web series have to be reworked to fit a more fixed length at Comedy Central, HBO has more flexibility when it comes to time frame. "If the story you want to tell requires 33 minutes... great," Rosenstein wrote. "If next week it is 24 minutes... fine. That freedom is creatively liberating."

Yvonne Orji and Issa Rae in 'Insecure.' Courtesy of HBO

Sinclair and Blichfeld aren't the only online creators HBO has bet on in the past year. While not the same show as Awkward Black Girl, HBO's new scripted comedy Insecure is built on the early online success of its star and creator Issa Rae. Awkward Black Girl showed what Rae could do with very little money and resources. Now, with an HBO budget, she has crafted one of the best shows of 2016. Rae herself is a vocal proponent of creating for the web, which is in many ways a more accessible avenue for emerging creators trying to get their foot in the door.

Women, people of color, and LGBTQ people underrepresented by mainstream media are writing themselves in by creating web shows. Gente-fied, an upcoming web series executive produced by America Ferrera, will explore the lives of young Latinxs in the gentrifying LA neighborhood of Boyle Heights. The Emmy-nominated web series Her Story is co-written by and stars Jen Richards, a trans woman, and focuses on a group of queer and trans characters. Pharrell Williams's i am OTHER YouTube channel, which became the home of Awkward Black Girl during its second season, continues to be a hub for online content made by people of color.

Web series can be a calling card for new creators, and they also allow for more experimentation since they don't have to fit the more structured mold of television. The complicated, long process of pitching a television series means "untested" talent often gets left out. Networks keep taking bets on the same people, contributing to the overwhelming whiteness and maleness of the television creator landscape. In the 2015–2016 television season, one out of every five creator credits went to men. Self-produced web series have opened up the pitch door a little more. And it's a global movement, too. Web series made in India provide new opportunities for creators to tell women-centric stories. That risk-taking, experimental environment that allowed all these burgeoning creators with shows on big networks like Comedy Central and HBO to establish their voice and garner their initial followings continues to churn out new talent all the time. More networks should be tapping into this diverse talent pool for fresh and unconventional ideas and individuals.

Follow Kayla Kumari Upadhyaya on Twitter.

What I Learned While Trying to Become a Canadian Gun Lover

$
0
0

My first gun range. Photos via Armed and Reasonable.

When I was first asked to host a documentary about guns for VICE, I had no clue what to expect.

As a reporter and an unapologetic city girl, I only really hear about guns in a negative context i.e. when homicides and mass shootings take place. While I didn't know much about Canadian gun culture, I'll admit that I had an idea of what our gun nuts might be like. I pictured mostly older white guys, living in rural areas and hunting deer in their spare time—the fruits of which would be on display somewhere in their homes. I assumed that they would mostly lean right, politically.

But I decided to keep an open mind.

What I learned, through the process of becoming a firearms license holder, trying out several types of shooting sports, and—for the sake of comparison—joining the National Rifle Association in the US, is that Canadian gun culture is quieter and far more anal than American gun culture. And most Canadian gun owners seem to be just fine with that.

Here are a few takeaways from my journey to becoming a gun owner.

O’Leary Vs. Leitch: Who Is the Real Canadian Donald Trump?

$
0
0

All photos via Twitter or Facebook

Canada's media is salivating for a Trump.

We're dying for it. Our bodies are ready. Bring us our Daddy, we need it, we need it so, so bad.

It's not surprising, the marauding cheeto that is America's president-elect has been a ratings and viewership bonanza for our friends down south. We saw that and have been searching for our very own lil' xenophobic demagogue ever since. Canadian media is in dire straits, viewership is down, people aren't buying papers, and activist organizations masquerading as media have moved in.

There are two obvious candidates for the now-necessary role of the Canadian Donald Trump who revives a stagnant conservative party made up of elites. In the beginning, we had Dr. Kellie Leitch, a Conservative insider who wanted you to believe she was actually the ultimate outsider. Many fell for her Trumpian charms.

Then, by the grace of Saint Ayn Rand, we got Kevin O'Leary, who dipped his toe in the leadership race recently and called Trudeau a "surfer dude"—which is a pretty solid burn if you live in Alberta.

Read More: K-Money Is Here to Make Canadian Politics Great Again for Fuck's Sake

So with all that in mind, I decided to rank Canada's prospective Trumps in order of most Trumpiness. Here are the five scientific categories I'll be ranking them by:

Believability
Most photos eating fast food
Dumb things said by mouth
Actual terrifying threat to humanity and dignity
"Fuck you" money

Believability

We're starting off easy here. Since one of the people running is an honest to goodness rich person that doesn't seem to give a fuck—not a single one—and has made his name being a total dick on a reality show. The other is a red Tory wearing the skin of a drunk libertarian she found and smothered under a bridge (the skin doesn't even fit that well.)

This one goes to O'Leary. Edgar the alien gets no points.

O'Leary:

Leitch:

Most Photos Eating Fast Food

THIS IS WHAT A LEADER DOES!

For the life of me (the twenty minutes I spent looking, I HAVE A DEADLINE PEOPLE) I couldn't find photos of either of these people eating fast food, which, as we know, has been a staple of Trump. So, no points are awarded in this round and may god have mercy on Mr. O'Leary and Ms. Leitch's souls as this is a critical oversight for both of them.

I hope this haunts the two of you. Try harder. net worth of $300 million, which while not Trump level, is still a ton of cashola. Leitch, a surgeon and politician, certainly has a ton more money than the regular Canadian but nowhere in the ballpark of O'Leary. So while both are among Canada's elites, O'Leary is certainly the more, uh... elitier.

O'Leary:

Leitch:

Final Verdict:

O'Leary 16; Leitch 10

So, we have a solid winner here, Mr. Wonderful is Canada's most Trumpiest Trump! While Leitch had a massive edge over O'Leary in terms of xenophobia she just couldn't topple the personality that is O'Leary.

Congratulations on your win, bud. And Ms. Leitch, if you're reading this, don't be too sad about your loss, because if you look at it real close it's clear to see that, really, all of Canada is the loser here.

Follow Mack Lamoureux on Twitter.

What Would Happen if the EPA Stopped Working Altogether?

$
0
0

Workers clean up a chemical spill in Ohio in 1974. Photo via Wikipedia/the EPA

Last week, Donald Trump, America's climate changedoubting president-elect, picked Oklahoma Attorney General Scott Pruitt, another climate change skeptic, to run the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA), an organization Trump has mused about shutting down. Given the hostility of Republicans generally and Pruitt in particular to environmental regulations—Pruitt has spent a lot of time fighting the EPA in court on behalf of his state's oil and gas businesses—it's safe to assume that he's going take a Ron Swanson–esque approach to management and scale back operations.

But what would scaling back those operations look like? If you're like me, you're not completely sure what the EPA does day-to-day, apart from regulating CO2 emissions and interfering with important private-sector ghost-busting work. So to find out what we would all be missing if the EPA were to suddenly just stop doing stuff, I got in touch with Braden Allenby, a professor of civil and environmental engineering at Arizona State University and former senior environmental attorney for AT&T. He said environmental protection is a whole lot more than just regulation CO2 emissions, and that even hardcore capitalists can love some of what it does.

VICE: What would we notice if we all left our houses tomorrow and the EPA had stopped doing its job?
Braden Allenby: Immediately, you wouldn't. Practices are in place. There are a lot of citizen watchdog groups, so it would not have an immediate impact. Over time, you would find that the quality of air and water degraded, and that you would have more incidents involving toxic materials and inappropriate management of hazardous materials. So you wouldn't notice it immediately, but you would notice it over time.

Would killing or completely gutting the EPA have any upsides?
exist at the EPA. The EPA has to please a lot of different constituencies, and as a result, what ends up in the regulations may not make the best sense from a pure environmental science perspective, but that comes with the turf. The bottom line is, if the EPA didn't exist, you'd have to invent it, because the idea that the free market acting alone is going to manage environmental insults was disproven by the history of activity before EPA was enabled in the Nixon administration.

What's the main thing that would be missing from government without a functioning EPA?
Most of what the EPA does is focused on day-to-day compliance issues: clean air, clean water, management of hazardous waste, regulation of pesticides and hazardous chemicals, the kind of thing that needs to get done on a national scale, regardless of whether or not it's the EPA that does it.

Which of the EPA's functions would the public probably miss the most?
The EPA has very strong requirements concerning how you manage toxic and hazardous waste, and the bottom line for me is that because of those regulations, the American public is a lot safer than they were before the EPA was established, even though there are a lot of new and different materials that are getting into waste streams. So the adjustment of environmental regulation to meet modern manufacturing and product design has been essentially invisible to the American public, but it has protected them.

Can't other agencies take care of this kind of stuff, like Scott Pruitt said? The EPA doesn't have to show up and, say, clean toxic waste spills in my local park, right?
It's entirely appropriate to handle that at a local park level. Let's say you have an issue where a particular is important in a community, but is polluting a river that is damaging cities downstream: Well, now a state might be able to handle that. But let's say you're talking about trans-border pollution flow: You may need a national entity to handle that. Phoenix, where I live, gets a lot of air from Southern California. Frequently, we have ozone exceedances because of the air coming from LA. That's the kind of thing you need an EPA for. California may not have the incentive to move against LA in order to protect Phoenix.

Other than sheer regulatory power, is there anything unique to the EPA that would be lost?
When you're the EPA, you can identify areas where you don't have enough information to regulate effectively. You may be over-regulating, and imposing unnecessary cost, or you may be under-regulating. One thing the EPA does is support research and development within its own laboratories, and also in universities—and I don't take the EPA funding by the way. What that does is, the EPA is able over time to build a base of research that supports more efficient and more intelligent regulation. That's something that most people don't realize, because they aren't involved in any of the R&D activities.

What are some of those activities?
One example is what we call "life-cycle assessment," where you look at a product not just in its use phase, but also in its product in its end-of-use phase, so you're looking at the entire lifecycle. The EPA has developed competency in that area. That's not an area most people think of, but it helps the EPA make more intelligent decisions, and it means we can get a desirable environment at a lower cost because we're able to think about things in a more intelligent way.

Don't manufacturers do that?
Manufacturers are looking at life-cycle assessment as well. But able to look at things like—let's take tires. Let's figure out the impact of the demand for tires. Let's think about whether there are alternative materials that might work or might not work, and what those impacts might be in the production phase, and how do you balance that against benefits and costs across the life of a tire.

Would the public be glad the EPA was finally out of our hair?
When you take surveys, you find out that people are very supportive of local environmental initiatives—things that clean up their area, their air, their water, their parks, and that help manage materials that might otherwise be dangerous in their area. Where it gets much more difficult to engage the public is when you're dealing with broad issues that the public doesn't directly perceive, and they can become very politically contested: things like climate change and biodiversity.

This conversation has been edited for length and clarity.

Follow Mike Pearl on Twitter.


Canada’s Weed Industry Reacts to the Government’s Just-Announced Legalization Report

$
0
0

Marijuana dispensaries, lounges, and recreational smokers all have reasons to be optimistic following the release of a government report on how legalization in Canada should be shaped.

The Task Force on Cannabis Legalization and Regulation made 80 recommendations to the government Tuesday. They include allowing for pot to be sold in retail spaces (a.k.a. dispensaries) and to be smoked at indoor marijuana lounges and tasting rooms.

The task force also said the legal age to purchase and consume cannabis should be 18, and that Canadians smoking recreationally should be allowed to possess a maximum of 30 grams of weed.

As for criminalization, the task force called for illegal production, trafficking, and selling to minors to remain criminal offences, but for lesser offences to move towards a fining system.

VICE reached out to several stakeholders in the marijuana industry to get their reactions to the news.

Jodie Emery, owner, Cannabis Culture dispensaries

Emery owns a string of fully recreational dispensaries that are currently operating illegally in Vancouver, Toronto, and Montreal.

While she told VICE it's "encouraging" that the task force has given dispensaries a green light, she said the fact that growers operating outside of the legal system will be "hunted down" by police is a new form of prohibition.

"LPs on the stock market are no doubt seeing share values go up. Smaller growers will have to continue to hide from law enforcement, because they cannot get past the expensive and exclusionary requirements to become an LP."


Photo via Flickr user Dank Depot

Abi Roach, owner, Roach-O-Rama and Hot Box Cafe

Roach, who has been battling the Smoke-Free Ontario Amendment Act, which would effectively make vape lounges illegal, said she was "extremely happy" about the report.

"I'm just crying reading it," she said. "I think this will clear that little hurdle that we're facing."

Roach also said she's pleased that the recommendations allow for small businesses and craft growers to partake in the new regime.

"I was a little concerned and feeling downtrodden that it was all for the fat cats."

But she said the government needs to come up with a plan on how to deal with those currently operating in a grey market prior to legalization actually being implemented.

"The raids need to stop," she said. "If they're going to give licenses out to small business, why not start now... and let the city start getting ready."

Photo via Flickr user Dank Depot

Sarah Gillies, cofounder, Green Market Toronto edibles pop-up

Gillies co-founded the Green Market in May, just before Toronto's Project Claudia dispensary raids which saw hundreds of kilograms of edibles were seized.

She said the task force's report—which said edibles should be legal as long as they are not appealing to children—was surprising in a good way.

"I think we're all used to expecting the worst especially with craft cannabis and edibles. We often got put on the back burner," she said. "It was really nice to see that they touched on it."

The task force also recommended edibles be contained in opaque, childproof packaging and be labelled to include THC and CBD levels.

"I think making things not look like candy is a little difficult so I'm not sure how they want us to make the edibles look," said Gilles, who makes lollipops, gummies, brownies, and cookies under her label The Bakers Shop. "It will force people to construct a whole new business model."

In light of Project Claudia, many dispensaries removed edibles from their shelves. The Green Market has attempted to fill that gap; its 20-25 businesses gather regularly to sell a variety of edibles.

"You're creating jobs, you're creating small businesses... you're giving patients access," said Gilles.

Justin Loizos, patient

Loizos, who uses cannabis to treat his multiple sclerosis, also said he's pleasantly surprised by the report.

"It shows that they did actually listen to the impact statements that were submitted by various people and especially our community, the medical community." In particular, he said he's relieved that storefronts are being recognized as a necessary option as opposed to just mail order cannabis.

However, he said he's been frustrated at the number of dispensaries who have been claiming to sell to patients when they really just want to sell recreational weed. He's concerned that that will slow down the implementation of legalization.

"The faster we get into legalization, the sooner sick patients will be left alone and allowed to heal."

Jordan Sinclair, spokesperson, Tweed (licensed producer)

Sinclair said the recommendations are a promising start to the conversation on legalization, with a focus on public health and safety.

However he raised concerns about the points on packaging and promotion (the report calls for "comprehensive restrictions" on the advertising and promotion of cannabis, similar to rules around cigarettes).

"While we agree that promotion, especially to youth, is a serious topic, it's important to recognize that packaging and advertising restrictions are driven by public health concerns," Sinclair told VICE. "With that in mind, packaging and promotion rules should reflect the relative public health risk posed by cannabis."

Photo via Flickr user Neon Tommy

Paul Lewin, lawyer and regional director, National Organization for the Reform of Marijuana Laws (NORML)

Lewin told VICE he doesn't believe that anyone should be receiving criminal records for cannabis-related offences anymore.

"It should be treated administratively," he said. "Like if your signal light is not working you get a ticket for it... You're not going to get a criminal record for having a signal light not working."

He also pointed out the recommendations, which say that trafficking, possession for the purpose of trafficking, exporting, and illicit production should remain criminal, leave room for interpretation by local governments and law enforcement.

"There will be the discretion to proceed as a straight criminal matter at all times and discretion is always bad."

Lewin said he would like the government to acknowledge the harm that prohibition has done to Canadians with criminal records. He believes they should consider pardons for those who have only been convicted of nonviolent cannabis crimes.

Follow Manisha Krishnan on Twitter.

What Does the Future of War Look Like?

$
0
0

On an all new episode of CYBERWAR, we investigate the future of writing code for machines that can kill. We also talk to experts about the complications that accompany wars being fought with autonomous machines, drones, and weapons.

CYBERWAR airs Tuesdays at 10:30 PM ET/PT on VICELAND

Want to know if you get VICELAND? Head here to find out how to tune in.


Inside Outsider: How I Brewed My Own Booze and Became an Alcoholic in Jail

$
0
0

This article originally appeared on VICE Australia.

Australia is a place where refusing to have a drink with someone can be as insulting as swearing at them. For better or worse, it's part of our culture: Goon of Fortune is a rite of passage, and it feels like one of best things a politician can do for their approval ratings is skull a pint on camera. Recently, the National Drug and Alcohol Research Centre (NDARC) director Professor Michael Farrell told the ABC "more than a third of the population drink in a manner hazardous to health."

So what happens to Aussie communities when alcohol is banned? How do people cope when they're denied a drink? I heard through the grapevine that Chris, an inmate in one of Victoria's most notorious prisons, became an alcoholic behind bars. He then began distilling his own brand of boob-head brew.

Now a free man, I travelled to his home in St Albans for a lesson in "pruno," AKA "hooch," AKA "boob-brew."

VICE: Give me the low down on how you ended up inside man.
Chris: I went inside for summary offences bro. I didn't commit any serious crimes, but I got stung with 18 months because I kept failing my CCO (community correction order). While I was inside my dad died because he had a fucked liver. They wouldn't let me go to the funeral.

I'm so sorry to hear that man. I'm tipping he was a drinker.
Ha! Yeah he loved a drink. It really fucked me up, and I know it sounds messed up but I used to love having a drink with him. I was in a minimum-security open camp prison at the time and managed to get his favourite bottle of scotch smuggled in.

I drank it to piss away my shitty feelings and it kinda reminded me of him. It got me by. Eventually, I got carried away and the prison officers caught wind of what I was doing and transferred me to Port Phillip.

Maximum security prisons would make the smuggling a lot more difficult.
Yeah, it's easier to improvise and make your own. I was cell-mates with a biker from Geelong who'd done a bit of nick. More than ten years. He showed me the ropes and I was brewing my own hooch within a week.

What's it made from?
Basically, you need to stock up on your fruits; oranges and apples are usually the go.

What's the process?
You get a rubbish bag, sometimes you can line your pillow with or find a stash spot for. You cut up the apples, oranges and any other fruit you can muster up. Add loads of sugar, pour in your water. And if you're lucky and have access, add a cup of vegemite, the yeast in it helps get the batch cooking faster.

The tricky part is finding a warm enough place to hang the bag. It's got to be tied with enough of an opening to let it air out as the fruit rots and the hooch brews. You're lucky, the one I've made for you today has rotten strawberries and grapes in it too.

Exotic.
Oh it fucking reeks. I've seen blokes throw up as soon as they see it, let alone smell or drink the shit. It's pretty funny though, everyone is disgusted at first sight, but every cunt drinks it anyway. Even the prison officers gag when they confiscate it, ha! One of them said we put him off drinking for months.

Feels like too much effort for me.
Mate, we were drinking a lot. Blokes really needed the stuff after a while. Whenever I had a few days off I couldn't sleep, I was always nervous and couldn't control my shakes. I grew up in the outer suburbs and never really smashed drugs like some of the other inmates but I was just as bad on the piss.

I never encouraged others to do it, it just helped me with whatever bullshit I was going through at the time. I would lie to myself a lot. One minute I thought it reminded me of my old man and the next I was using it as an escape. But I'm getting there now, been at AA over a year now.

So you wont be necking any of this fine concoction you've prepared for me?
Fuck no! I'm definitely done with that shit!

I'll have mine on ice with a slice of lime, cheers bud.
You're a psychopath.

It didn't taste good. I had hoped I'd end up feeling like a prohibition-era mobster, but I was mistaken. It was like swallowing warm oysters that tasted like sour vomit, after you've drunk-devoured a train station Chiko roll. After hours of nauseous gagging, the thick smell was still choking me. I looked and felt like a Bukowski come-down.

BIG THURSDAY, LADS: London Takes More Cocaine Midweek Than Anywhere Else in Europe

$
0
0

(Photo via Cory Doctorow)

Ah, it is that time of year again, my favourite time of year: European wastewater-based drug epidemiology study time! This is important because someone from science has to go through all of Europe's piss, shit and wastewater – in 50 cities, across 18 countries – trying to find drugs, and that idea amuses me.

Just imagine it, though. Say, for instance, you just did a really great rail of coke. Like: a just superbly chunky line, my dude. And then you go and dance and tap your two front numb teeth and go wide-eyed and tell everyone that, like, yeah, I totally actually had something like that happen to me no way fuck that's so cool, and then you go and do a big gakky piss, and then that piss gurgles down the toilet and swirls through water pipes and ends up clunking around, the piss and piss particles, in the sewers, and wefts and wends its way downstream towards a water treatment plant, where some nerd in a lab coat scoops up a test tube of it and dab-tests it for cocaine. What a world! What a way to live your life! That you – little old you – that you and your gak piss can end up in a study, a European study! Truly, science is magic.

So, anyway, although you can read the whole thing here you won't, and so the main takeaways here are:

— Oh No: London is no longer the cocaine capital of Europe, losing out just about to Antwerp, in Belgium, which has bigger weekends than us that tip up the weekly average usage (1,042mg per 1,000 people per day in Antwerp, versus 999.3mg per day in London);

— Hooray, though: London is now the European leader for midweek coke binges, with 790.5mg of cocaine per 1,000 people per day found in wastewater between Tuesday and Thursday.

The science does not define whether we1 are such big midweek cocaine users because we just, on the whole, love toot, or whether there is something else there, and I would like to pitch to science a deep study of a concept called "Big Thursdays" – a concept I am overly familiar with.

A Big Thursday, for those who don't know, is a Thursday that is exceptionally Big. You go into Big Thursday knowing it is going to be Big: you know that this is not a Friday, or a Saturday; you know it is a Thursday; you know you have work tomorrow, that getting in at 4AM is ill-advised. But you plough on ahead with it anyway because you are enraptured by the sesh. Friday You – the tomorrow morning version of you – Friday You is going to hate you: nursing a Lucozade at your desk, taking an eye-stinging nap in a quiet room somewhere, knocking off an hour early and getting in an hour late, pizza for lunch, entire thing of Dinky Deckers.

But for now you are alive: in a club, with other people pushing their cares away deep down inside them, away from them, away from where they can see; in the toilets, bathed in halcyon light; dancing; sweating; Uber home and a kebab for after. Big Thursday is a WhatsApp group, is plans in advance. Big Thursday is so Big you're not going to feel better until Monday. Big Thursday is an ethos, a state of mind. Sometimes we just need it – a massive, massive Thursday. And for one lowly midweek night, there you are, the King or Queen of it: railed up to the eyeballs, gak piss seeping out of your body, young, twinkling, perfect, alive. Here's to Big Thursdays, and here's to being the midweek coke capital of Europe. Here's to science trawling our piss and shit for drugs.

1. I am using the 'London we', here, the little-used capital-ist plural form: readers in the north are advised to avert their gaze lest they get offended by it. Here is a soothing photo they can look at instead.

@joelgolby

More stuff about ~~drugs~~

My Year in Productivity While Microdosing

How People Smuggled Drugs Into This Summer's Music Festivals

There's a Show About Building IKEA Furniture on Drugs

Looking Back On Christmas 20 Years Ago to See if the World Really Was a Better Place

$
0
0

Source and thumbnail image - BBC

Christmas is a nostalgic time of year. As a child, the excitement comes from your indoctrination into your parents' traditions: what time you open presents, how long you cook the roast potatoes and how much Baileys you drink with breakfast. Then, as an adult, you spend the rest of your life trying to replicate those traditions in the hope that you will somehow recapture that overwhelming mixture of sickness and excitement you used to get in the pit of your stomach – back when Christmas meant more than just a chance to sit in a chair for an entire day without having to look at a spreadsheet.

Yet, as much as we repeat these rituals, it's never quite the same. We wake up on Christmas morning with aching joints; we eat too much in the first 40 minutes of the day; we're given exactly £15 worth of iTunes vouchers; and before long we are pinging pistachio shells anywhere within a five-mile radius of the waste-paper basket while the Strictly special blares away in the background. None of this is to adopt some Grumpy Old Men "isn't Christmas shit" approach – it isn't. Christmas is a solid 8/10 experience. But there's no ignoring the strangely melancholic truth that, deep down, we all wish we were five years old again. We all wish Father Christmas was still real and we could still pull off a little flashing Rudolph bowtie.

That said, was Christmas actually better back then? Back before James Corden sang over Sainsbury's adverts and your mum spent the entire day trying to set up her new iPad with all the information from the old one. Or does it just feel that way now that you get a hangover after eating one too many chocolate liqueurs? Well, we can't actually travel back in time, but what we can do is travel back 20 years via the power of the internet, revisit what was on television and make grand, spurious claims based on that.

So let's do it:

CHRISTMAS NUMBER 1: SPICE GIRLS – "2 BECOME 1"

The Spice Girls here with the first of their three consecutive Christmas Number 1s, and with a video that in retrospect looks an awful lot like a Littlewoods advert. I like this song a lot; it's familiar and cosy – a love song that says: "Tonight we're going to have some really nice, mutually enjoyable sex, and then we'll sling on a pair of big roll-neck sweaters and eat a box of Maltesers beside a roaring fire." The Spice Girls were a more consistent band than Blur, so as far as revisiting 1990s pop culture goes this is an exceptionally welcome memory. Oh, and the chances are Christmas number 1 this year is going to be Honey G, or some military-doctors covering "You Raise Me Up", or whatever sad-lad piano-cover soundtracked the John Lewis Christmas advert. So far, Christmas 1996 is looking empirically better.

THE NEWS

What wouldn't you give – what wouldn't you fucking give – to turn on the 6PM news and hear the newsreader say, "In London, a light dusting of snow at 5 o'clock this morning was the first in 20 years"? What wouldn't you give to enjoy a delightful little story about "weather obsessed gamblers" getting one over the pesky bookmakers by enjoying the first white Christmas in the capital since 1970? What wouldn't you give to return to a time when snow was even possible – before every Christmas day was "the warmest on record"? What wouldn't you give to see this bloke...

Screen Shot 2016-12-12 at 14.04.56.png

...making headlines instead of Donald Trump, Nigel Farage, Theresa May and every other poached, white, wrinkly face currently stretched across each and every news channel?

'EASTENDERS'

It's no secret that, on Christmas Day, the residents of Albert Square can't enjoy any turkey until they've fucked, killed and psychologically destroyed their loved ones, and 1996 was no different. Grant – despite being married to a pregnant Tiffany – is bonking Lorraine Wicks in a bedroom above the Queen Vic. Not only that, but apparently Phil Mitchell spent the entirety of 1996 drunk. Anyway, as you can imagine, the whole thing ends with about 12 Mitchells shouting "you're aat of order" and "shat up you cow" at each other, until Peggy flips her lid and kicks them all out. I'd wager, given that the most exciting thing Eastenders has done in recent years was briefly reuniting the Mitchell brothers, that it's safe to say these halcyon days back in 1996 were superior – even if the idea of two bald siblings shagging their way around every available 20-something woman in their neighbourhood remains as implausible as the existence of Father Christmas.

'CORONATION STREET'

I can't find any clips of this, but apparently Curly – the one who sort of looked like Harry Potter if he'd never found out he was a wizard and instead ended up living alone in Bradford – snogged someone, or something. I've only ever watched bits of Coronation Street in passing at Christmas, so I sort of find it similar to the very long ongoing conversation I have with my mum's friend Keith every single year on Christmas Eve about what he's up to now he's retired. Whatever happens to the rest of the world, however much I tune in or out, Coronation Street will be meandering through sequences of suffocating, suburban nothingness, and Keith will be mumbling about Airfix.

'NOEL'S CHRISTMAS PRESENTS 1996'

Noel's Christmas Presents was a mixture between the Pride of Britain awards and a pagan ritual. The setup seems to be that Noel surprises some deserving person shortly before Christmas by knocking on their door and revealing that he knows everything about their personal life, including a recent hardship they have undergone, before giving them a gift they'll never forget. Trouble is, in true Edmonds style, everything he says sounds so serious that he constantly comes across like he's arrived at their house to inform them that their children have been involved in a traffic collision, which sort of takes the Christmassy sparkle out of the whole thing. Still, though, better than Text Santa.

'DES O'CONNOR – CHRISTMAS WITH THE STARS'

Okay, there is a lot to process and explain here, so let's try and deal with this 29-second trailer for Des O'Connor's Christmas with the Stars piece by piece.

  1. Joe Pasquale here with a camel. How did he get famous in the first place? Why did he sound like a dying old lady? What happened to Joe Pasquale? Has anyone done a check to find out where he is? Maybe we should do a quick check just to make sure he isn't trapped in a lift somewhere in the old Granada studios or something, squeaking up the vent, trying to get someone to help him out.
  2. The Two Fat Ladies were a pair of TV cooks who I seem to remember were pretty big in the 1990s. They are both dead now.
  3. Lily Savage was a very popular female comedian who transitioned into Paul O'Grady sometime in 2003, I believe. Her main schtick was saying stuff like "Oooh, I'd let Julio Iglesias stuff my turkey." Popular with my mum.
  4. Julio Iglesias and Diana Ross sharing a sofa here – a gentle reminder of a time before every Christmas musical guest was contractually obliged to be Michael Buble.
  5. Des O'Connor, for those who don't remember, was a comedian and presenter with a big syrupy, biscuit-like head. He often hosted big "an evening with" type shows on ITV, just like this one, until more recently he was given a breakfast show with Melanie Sykes.

If Des' Christmas extravaganza teaches us anything about the Christmas of 1996, it's that we had fewer options open to us. In a time before everyone had their own screen, and every screen hosted a thousand different channels, it was up to shows like this to try and aggregate an hour's worth of entertainment that the whole family would enjoy. Or at least that the whole family would pretend to enjoy. The TV might not have been better, but the point is it was all we had. Maybe now, with all the options at our disposal, we've lost sight of what it's really all about?

Sure, if you don't like what's on TV you go spend the whole day staring at your phone, but the true meaning – the meaning that Noel and Des spent years trying to get across to us – is being together, regardless of whether or not you are enjoying the television. A group of people, sat in silence, half asleep, half willing Doctor Who to finish.

@a_n_g_u_s

More on VICE:


What It's Actually Like to be a Shopping Centre Santa

Let's Ruin Christmas by Turning It into an Economics Lesson

An Investigation: Which Is the Best Quality Street in the Quality Street Tub?

Viewing all 38002 articles
Browse latest View live


Latest Images