Quantcast
Channel: VICE CA
Viewing all 38002 articles
Browse latest View live

My Landlord Mom Refuses to Cash in on San Francisco's Insane Housing Market

$
0
0

Photo via Flickr user Alex Guerrero

This article originally appeared on VICE US

"Are you sure you really want to live here? This place is so dark and ugly!" my mom told the prospective tenants, a young couple, viewing the apartment in her San Francisco house that she was ostensibly trying to rent out. I sucked my teeth. I'd worried about this happening, that my mom would feel so guilty for the high price she was asking that she'd try to scare off potential renters by openly disparaging the one bedroom in-law. The young couple looked confused. "Um, I actually like this wood paneling, it's so vintage," the young man said, running his hand against the wall. I began to tell the couple what the terms of the lease would be, but my mom cut me off. "This thing is ugly," she said with a look of repulsion, pointing to the bedroom door, a brown vinyl relic of the 70s that pulled closed like an accordion and was, objectively, ugly. My mom spoke as if she were the prospective tenant, trying to convince a landlord to lower the price by highlighting all of the apartment's flaws.

The national headlines emerging from San Francisco's current rental crisis paint a picture of wealthy landlords pushing old ladies out of units they've inhabited for decades in order to quadruple their profits housing techies. While that happens, a sizable portion of the city's rental stock exists in landlord-occupied buildings like the one I grew up in. In many cases, these landlords are like my mom: teachers, carpenters, small business owners, etc., who bought their homes before prices exploded. Now, they're suddenly presented with the opportunity to make a profit on their homes' extra units. For my mom, like many of my friends' parents, this opportunity presents an ethical quandary: is it right to charge what the market will bear, even if that price seems absurd?

For years, my mom's answer to that question was no. She rented to friends of friends, charging between $500-$1000 a month below the market rate. So while San Francisco had become the most expensive rental market in the country, my mom had delayed retiring from work as a preschool teacher in order to keep up with her mortgage payments. It was time for her to cash in. No more of these sweetheart deals she'd given previous tenants due to their stations in life. There'd been the renter who was a single mom with a young daughter. Of course the rent had to remain low for her, my mom argued. Then there was the Central American immigrant couple who occasionally shared the dinner they'd cooked with my mom. Being a Guatemalan immigrant herself, my mom sympathized with them. And their grilled pork chops. So the rent couldn't be too high for them, either. "I like to give people a chance," she'd say to me about the low rent she'd charge.

In my mom's eyes, there was a morality that existed independently of what the market allowed.

However, this time I was determined. When the previous tenant announced his departure, I insisted that my mom charge $1500 for the apartment. She begrudgingly agreed, but then immediately started spending money trying to improve the place. She installed a new set of curtains. She patched a hole in the ceiling. She applied a fresh coat of paint (or my older brother did at her behest). My brother told her to leave things the way they were, that in San Francisco's rental market, the place would rent as it was. My mom replied indignantly, "I'm decent and I won't do that to people. Period." In my mom's eyes, there was a morality that existed independently of what the market allowed. Just as there had been in 1990, when our elderly landlord, who'd kept our rent low, died and her son inherited the house we lived in. He raised our monthly rent to a then-incomprehensible $1000, forcing my mom, my brother, and me to move out of the apartment I'd grown up in. That had been wrong. Period.

Even though my mom had agreed to let me list her in-law on Craigslist (a major step itself for a woman who worried about the 'crazy people on the internet'), she retained guilt for charging what she deemed an unethical and unwarranted rate. It didn't help that the first people to see the place, the young couple, were so sympathetic. These weren't the affluent Twitter or Google bros I'd hoped for, the ones you actually wanted to overcharge. Instead, the prospective tenants were Arkansas transplants in their mid-20s, he a math tutor at San Francisco State, she a manager at a Starbucks downtown. They were obviously in love and seemingly at the beginning of a life together. In short, they were exactly the kind of people my mom would want to "give a chance."

"It flooded in here last year during a big storm," my mom said to no one in particular while the couple toured the space. "The carpet got stinky. The last tenant had to move in with his mom for a week." Then, perhaps sensing the unease her statement had provoked, my mom pointed to the sandbags just outside the sliding glass door that led to the backyard. "But those should help if there's another big storm. Probably."

In spite of the veracity of my mom's criticisms, there was nothing she could've said to the the young couple that would have curbed their interest in the apartment. She could've told them that the walls bulged with asbestos, that the carpet crawled with roaches, that at night the roaches crawled through the walls and loudly gnawed the asbestos. These tenants wouldn't have cared. According to them, they were paying almost $2000 a month to live in a studio half the size of the in-law's living room. In Daly City. My mom heard them say this and flinched. I knew what she thought: if there was ever an ugly place that deserved to be painted over, that could use a new set of curtains, it was Daly City. I hoped that the reality of the rental market I'd attempted to impress upon her had finally sunk in. Instead, she said, "But still, why would you want to live here?"

The young couple submitted their application for the apartment and said goodbye. After they'd left, I chewed out my mom. She sheepishly apologized. "I'm no good at business stuff, mijo," she said, though she seemed ready to admit that the price they were paying wasn't highway robbery. "I guess I am giving them a pretty good deal," my mom said to me with a smile.

Follow Jesse on Twitter.


How Much Can One-Off Protests Change People's Minds About Abortion?

$
0
0

(Illustration by Joel Benjamin)

You'd hardly call live-tweeting an abortion a fun time. But when you're from a country like Ireland, with some of the most restrictive abortion laws in the world, it can become a form of protest – the question is, just how effective could it be in the long-term?

Two weekends ago, a pair of Irish friends gained more than 26,000 followers as they embarked on a 28-tweet trip that at least 70 others would make that week. Abortion is criminal in almost all situations in Ireland – including cases involving rape, incest, or fatal foetal abnormality – so travelling across the border becomes some women's only option.

Sinead – not her real name – tells VICE she'd never even used Twitter before this journey but "if it helps people to see abortion in a less sensationalist perspective, that's fucking great." While her main role was as a supporter for her friend, Sinead says she was inspired to use the platform by Grainne Maguire, an Irish comedian who launched a social media campaign last November encouraging women to send details of their periods to Irish Taoiseach – head of government – Enda Kenny, in protest against the current law.

This time, the use of social media felt riskier. "I was very nervous for my friend that our anonymity would be compromised. Like if we clicked the wrong button." The pair took precautions, splitting up going through passport control. In total their trip, including flights, taxis, dingy hotel, and the abortion itself, cost about 2,000 euros.

"Every time another woman dies in gruesome circumstances we think it will be the defining moment," Sinead says, adding that the overwhelmingly supportive response to her stunt shows how much Ireland's government needs to address the dysfunctional law. "It's very encouraging to think that maybe we can maintain a consistent dialogue now."

Young Irish pro-choice activists are resorting to more guerilla-style actions in a bid to keep the topic in the public discourse, but with decades of governments adopting an unspoken "out of sight, out of mind" attitude, it's difficult to see what might provide the catalyst for change. As it stands, the country would need a referendum to change its constitution – the right to life of an unborn child is protected in its eighth amendment.

In practice, this legal provision means that women whose babies won't survive outside the womb can't terminate their pregnancies in-country, so they go to England. For those who can't travel, the implications of the law can be much more painful: A woman is currently suing the state after she was force-fed and forced to undergo a caesarean after she was raped; she couldn't travel to the UK because of her immigration status.

This seemingly disparate cluster of protests isn't all based online. Over the summer, "Repeal the 8th" graffiti sprung up across Dublin – a late July removal order by authorities only generated more murals. In early July, a pop-up selling 25-euro black jumpers emblazoned with the word REPEAL filled with customers and ran out of stock in hours. The project's founder Anna Cosgrave calls her work a "micro contribution to a movement spanning decades".

Meanwhile, last week, Brianna Parkins, who represented Sydney at the bizarrely traditional "lovely girls"-style Rose of Tralee competition, used her televised interview on state broadcaster RTE to call for an eighth amendment repeal. While she didn't think her small act of rebellion would "change the world", Parkins says she hoped it helped spark debate: "I think they're up against a hard wall but Irish women and Irish men, they get stuff done."

But will any of this have a likely impact on the government? "They have been very effective kind of stunts," says Brian Hanley, a member of the Irish Association of Professional Historians, "but in the longer run I don't know how many of those things you can do before their value declines. Unfortunately I think you still have to rely on old-fashioned campaigning – particularly face-to-face."

Hanley remembers the 1990s wave of demonstrations around another case, known only as "X", when a pregnant and suicidal 14-year-old was refused an abortion. "That felt hugely transformative," he says. "People used to spray the number of the abortion services numbers on the walls – we used to write them on placards deliberately to get them on television."

WATCH: The Debate Over an Abortion Ban Rages on in Ireland

But ultimately, even traditional and confrontational forms of protests slammed into obstacles. "What the mainstream politicians were quite adept at doing was fobbing it off," Hanley says, "making small gestures that made it look like they were paying attention but no actual changes."

Notably more dismissive of the new wave of activism is renowned Irish journalist and feminist campaigner Nell McCafferty, 72. She suggests campaigners were ignorant about the specifics of what they were pushing for. "People need to be aware of the various stages of pregnancy – which one of these young activists even knows what a zygote is?" she asks, sharply.

In her opinion, a referendum would take at least another three years, and everyone needs to get educated in the meantime. "If you repeal it what are you going to replace it with? Anyone at all, even the most rightwing people can agree to repeal the eighth so it's not a question of that, it's what happens after... It's all very vague and unsatisfactory."

Ultimately, it's hard to tell whether public opinion would support a change, as we saw with the historic 2015 referendum on marriage equality. "I think the ground has shifted, and the anti-abortion or extreme have been marginalised to some extent," Hanley says, his voice trailing off. He adds, somewhat uncertainly, that while it would take longer to convince the majority of Irish citizens, "there are politicians who are hedging their bets. They will realise it's not a political death sentence. In the 1980s it effectively was, now it's a credible argument."

@sallyhayd

More on VICE:

Why Do Women In London Have More Abortions Than the Rest of England?

The Women Forced to Perform DIY Medical Abortions in Ireland

Did a Woman Really Have to Die While Having a Miscarriage, Ireland?

What It's Like to Be an Atheist in Prison When Only God Forgives

$
0
0

Photo by Chaddy Fynn via

This article originally appeared on VICE UK

Prison might be a grim place, but it's a holy one too. We've all heard the stories: hardened criminal commits heinous act, gets locked up for decades, and, after spending his first few years brawling and taking drugs, meets another inmate who quotes just the right bible passage so that our guy ends up finding God.

There's some truth to the narrative, too. While the UK as a whole is becoming less religious, there's been a significant increase in the number of religious people currently held in the UK's prison system. More than 42,000 Christians live behind bars, up from around 40,000 in 2004, while the number of Muslims has nearly doubled from 6,571 to just over 12,000. As a result, many prisons have adapted to help inmates on their journeys with God, providing prayer rooms, more access to chaplains, and facilitating special dietary requirements.

Which is all well and good, unless you're an atheist. No one quite knows how many prisoners could be classified as such, in part because the question isn't asked specifically, but over 25,000 prisoners were recorded to "not have a religion" in 2014.

I meet Alan (whose identity I've concealed as per his solicitor's request) in central London. Last year, he finished his eight-and-a-half-year sentence for robbery and assault, and during his incarceration moved between various prisons across the country. Having grown up in a semi-devout Catholic family, Alan's now a committed atheist. Several times in our conversation he refers to religion—all religion—as "total fucking bollocks." It's a bit awkward when I tell him I'm a Muslim, but he laughs it off, saying he hopes one day I'll "wake up and see some sense."

"Religion was a huge thing in prison; they were all mad for it," Alan tells me. "Part of it was the survival instinct: some of the boys who were associated with the prison gangs converted to Islam, and that was more to be part of the pack than driven by any sincere belief. They wanted to be part of a group, and I don't blame them—prison's a fucking lonely place."

Zealots aside, Alan says that the mix of free time, an abundance of Christian literature, and frequent conversations with chaplains from faith groups often led people to embrace religion again. For some prisoners, he says it was opportunistic—"they didn't care about religion, but also didn't want to be holed up all day. So they'd put on a bit of an act, convince the boss they wanted to change their lives in prison. Really that was just so they could go out and do group activities: sports, art, shit like that."

When I ask Alan why he didn't simply pretend to be religious, he shrugs. "I'm not a good actor. I'd have the opportunity to speak to the prison chaplain if I wanted, but I didn't see much use, and I wasn't willing to pretend I was religious to get fairly mundane privileges." Few people chose that path. As a result, most of Alan's prison life was lonely, with his time spent exercising, watching TV, and sleeping.

Nearly all prisons in the UK have at least one in-house chaplain to provide pastoral care and support, according to the Ministry of Justice. And while the care provided is supposed to be for all inmates, the historic role of the chaplain has nearly always been a religious one. "Spiritual issues are rife in prison—the sense of abandonment, loneliness, shame is palpable," says Ben Ryan, a researcher at Christian think tank Theos. "Faith-based chaplains can help formulate answers to these questions. They are trusted figures who have a different status to other prison employees. They're often used in official or unofficial brokerage roles, for example getting prisoners to end dirty protests, while the faith-specific element allows prisoners to fulfill their right to practice their religion."

Ben tells me that while chaplains are useful in the rehabilitation process for prisoners—providing literal "safe spaces" by the way of chapels—"more could be done to support the non-religious. There's definitely a shortage of alternative pastoral and welfare support."

It's a sentiment Alan would agree with, as he says the dominance of faith in the UK prison system meant there were few options available to him during the tougher parts of his sentence. He went through serious periods of depression, but says he "just didn't feel comfortable talking to the chaplain; he was a nice guy, but I felt when I was explaining things to him, he didn't really get it. Everything would go back to how I 'felt spiritually' and what I needed to do to boost my spirit. I told him I didn't believe in God, which he said was fine—but five minutes later, he'd go on about God loving everyone. It just made me more angry."

There's this idea that prisoners go in bad, and come out good—that's why I think religion is so powerful there. It's the whole idea of being 'forgiven' — atheist and former inmate, Alan

According to the British Humanist Association, cases like Alan's are more common than you'd think. For nearly a decade, the BHA has provided copies of the Young Atheist's Handbook to prisons around the country, and has lobbied the government to provide more resources for non-believers behind bars.

"'Chaplain' is a wholly Christian term and research shows that it often acts as a barrier for non-religious people in accessing support in times of crisis," says Simon O' Donoghue, BHA head of pastoral support. "Our pastoral carers provide a very similar service to religious chaplains, in that they provide a listening ear at times of crisis in order to tend to the pastoral needs of prisoners."

O'Donoghue tells me that while most 'rehabilitation' services in prisons are run by 'secular' organizations—namely the probation service and psychology departments—they still contain faith-based element. Just take "recognizing the need for a higher power" in the 12-step RAPt drugs program. "So if you have a drug or alcohol problems and you are an atheist," he says, "your choice is rather narrow compared to your religious counterparts."

Providing more choice in prisons will be difficult, though. According to the majority of voluntary chaplaincy organizations I spoke to, cuts to the prison service have hit prisoners the most, particularly in areas like welfare and support. Volunteers fill the gap, and, not surprisingly, most come from religious groups. You end up in a sort of catch-22, where the very types of people more likely to want to help—"because of the kind of redemptive narrative that exists in there," according to Matthew Wells, the national secretary of the Community Chaplaincy Association—might be the most alienating to atheist inmates.

"There's this idea that prisoners go in bad, and come out good—that's why I think religion is so powerful there," says Alan. "It's the whole idea of being 'forgiven.'" Instead, he suggests, prison should be a place with more emphasis on learning, "with all the free time, people could be using to look at their own opinions and decide for themselves who they want to be when their time is up—that's going to require more than some bloke telling you that God loves you."

Follow Hussein on Twitter.


We Asked People in Long-Term Relationships About Their Fantasies of Being Single

$
0
0

Double bed for one, please. Photo via pixabay

Admit it, folks in long-term relationships: you've thought about it.

Whether you've been together two years or 10, whether it's been after a fight, a few pints, or just some casual soul-searching, there's been a moment where you imagined what your life could be if you were suddenly single. Some of us have even gone a step further, and have a full-fledged post-breakup fantasy; a crush from our past we'd get in touch with, a trip we'd take, a motorcycle we'd buy, a moustache we'd grow, a clumsy threesome we'd try and coordinate.

But like the Death Star plans in Star Wars, they're the sort of thing usually kept under heavy guard (for the record, my girlfriend's is frighteningly detailed). So with that in mind, we decided to shamelessly exploit a bunch of folks in committed relationships, and extract the intimate details of their secret breakup contingency plans.

Bryan
Relationship status: dating for five years

I know exactly what I'd do. I'd go hook up with my old high school crush. No question. She's a girl I never got with. I had an opportunity last time I was single and I totally choked. And even worse, I didn't really realize how into it she was until much later (once I'd started dating my current girlfriend). If I was suddenly single today, even though I'm not sure I find that girl amazingly attractive anymore, that would be very high on my to-do list.

Jackie
Relationship status: engaged, dating for two years

The first thing I would do if I was newly single would be to bask in the sweet freedom of starfishing in the open prairie of a double bed for one. God, I love sleeping alone. I'm an anxious insomniac and basically the worst bedmate ever: a too-light sleeper, a frequent toss-and-turner, and a sometime-snorer. My partner, on the other hand, falls into a deep, snuffly sleep seconds after switching off the light. These days, my best, most REM-filled moments of sleep take place on weekday mornings between 6 and 7:30 AM, when my partner gets up early for work and I have the bed to myself for a while.

I would also be so curious to try online dating. I'm one of those annoying people who is almost constantly in some kind of serious relationship, and for this reason I've missed the good ship Tinder by a country mile (by the time online dating was a thing, I was ensconced in seemingly-interminable cohabitation). I'd rekindle my love of dining out, attending concerts, and going to movies alone. You can always find a spot near the stage when you're at a concert by yourself, and going to movies alone means you can acceptably take up two seats just for you: one for me, one for my jacket, Nibs, and enormous bag of popcorn-dinner I'll have no shame about digesting strangely later, ideally in my own apartment where I live alone.

Pete
Relationship status: dating over five years

If I suddenly found myself single, the first thing I would do is get out of my girlfriend's social circle, to avoid fucking all (or most) of her friends. That way it would be okay if I fucked, like, one of her friends. Then I would reclaim my artistic passions. Make loud music, make an obscene collage, and go on a road trip to nowhere by myself at high speeds.

Peyton
Relationship status: dating three years

I'd head out of town and hook up with my last ex. It sounds weird, but I think he'd be good for rebound sex. I don't care about him anymore, and when I was with him, I was a bit of a mouse—in sex and in life. I only ever had two orgasms with him. And now that I've been in a relationship where I've actually been having regular orgasms, I'd like to go back in a context where I could say, "Um. Actually, you did it wrong for all those years, and you need to do this instead." It would feel a bit like scoring a win for my younger self. I find that when I'm single, I'm more likely to try new things. If I don't have something to occupy me, I can get pretty depressed. The last time I was single, I tried slam poetry. Maybe I'd do pottery. Find a new hobby that isn't a boy.

Jason
Relationship status: dating three years

I'd throw out my earplugs and enjoy the first night of not being woken up by snoring in years. Also, I'd give the dog her side of the bed; it's not big enough for the three of us as it is.

I've had this dream for years of a Golden Summer—this time when I ride my bike everywhere, work rarely, and have just a shit-ton of very casual sex with a small stable of people who are on the same page (I used to have a good idea of who those people would be, but all of them are in their own relationships now). I'd probably also grow a beard and spend some time living in a sweet camper van, both things I'd like to have done, but aren't super popular with the current administration.

Josie
Relationship status: dating three years

My partner and I already have a trip booked through Southeast Asia, and if I were single, I just wouldn't come home. I didn't originally want to have a return date, but when you have somebody else involved, you have to make decisions that work for the both of you. If we were suddenly not together, I'd go, and just stay until my money ran out.

Beyond that, I'd explore dating other genders. I mean, I have the opportunity to do that now, but as a single person, there'd be more opportunity to do it on my own terms. And I'd start drinking again... So I'd probably end up going on a really slutty, drunken tear through Asia. That's essentially what would happen. Just a promiscuous mess through another country. Or multiple countries. Or maybe I'd only get through one, and then die or something. It's hard to say.

Jesse Donaldson is a Vancouver writer.

​What a Worst-Case Scenario Earthquake Would Look Like in Vancouver

$
0
0

Illustration by Adam Waito

If you live on the West Coast, you likely already know there's about a 37 percent chance we'll see a massive quake in the next 50 years. Here in Vancouver, we know vaguely that the ground will shake, that glass will shatter, that we should probably have some water and food saved up—but for many of us it's still hard to imagine what the city will feel like in the hours and weeks after the shaking stops. Should we head for high ground? Will our toilets still flush? Hypothetically, where do you take your dead roommate? We reached out to some geological and disaster planning experts to paint a more vivid picture of what to expect in a worst-case scenario earthquake. They told us we could potentially find ourselves camping out of backyards waiting for help that may never come, while as many as 10,000 dead could be stored in the most Canadian place possible: an ice rink.

The first thing to know about Vancouver is that it's actually 100 kilometres from the fault line that has torn open the Pacific Northwest coast roughly every 500 years for the last ten millennia (the last one was in 1700). That means the shaking will be in longer, less violent waves than in Portland or Seattle, and tsunami waves likely won't make it much further than Olympic Peninsula and Vancouver Island. "For a person on the ground, it would feel as if you were at sea," says John Clague, seismic researcher at Simon Fraser University.

Clague says he's worried about older buildings in the West End, about landslides across the major highways in North Vancouver and Fraser Canyon, and the bridges that haven't been seismically upgraded in over 60 years (shout out to Pattullo bridge that connects New Westminster and Surrey). Low-lying areas like Richmond, Delta, Surrey and White Rock will be most susceptible to liquefaction, which will absorb building foundations like quicksand and damage airport and ferry terminals.

What emergency planners say will actually be more deadly is a lower intensity earthquake right beneath the city. Using a software used by the United States' Federal Emergency Management Association called Hazus, British Columbia has built its worst case scenario around a 7.3 quake that could be as short as 10 to 20 seconds. That scenario predicts resulting fires, floods and collapsed structures will kill 10,000 and injure 128,000. Shifts underground could cause pipes carrying natural gas, water and sewage to break and burst, leaving many of us without power or flushing toilets.

Read More: After the Big One

Christine Callihoo, a volunteer emergency responder, says not to bother calling 911 when the big one hits. "It could be days," she said of response times. "We really need to drill home to folks—you are on your own. We are on our own. We need to act as a collective, as if we were completely unaided, because we will be completely unaided."

Most of us will rush to check in on friends and family. But because phone towers are usually overloaded after a disaster, experts suggest posting updates to social media or sending text messages—which is perhaps an upside for younger generations who find actual phone calls excruciating.

Condo and apartment dwellers take note: "Your backyard may truly become your home," says earthquake safety consultant Lisa Matthew, explaining that structural damage to homes could mean it's unsafe to sleep inside. Vancouver's latest earthquake plan, released earlier this year, breaks the city into six zones, each with an emergency response centre capable of housing thousands of displaced and injured from apartment buildings and condos.

Matthew, along with other earthquake experts recommends we have enough supplies to feed, clothe and bathe ourselves for a week or more. But the majority of residents aren't prepared.

For example, the best place to take a dump could be in a plastic bag or a two-foot deep hole that you dig in your backyard. Or perhaps you'll end up using a communal outhouse that someone will have built at the park down the street. Unless of course you've purchased an emergency earthquake kit that includes a "honey bucket"—a large bucket with a toilet seat that snaps on top, and lined with plastic bags.

Local radio stations will provide updates to the public so experts recommend having a "crank" radio (these have a handle that you wind up to power) and say that a solar charger for our short-lived phone batteries will come in handy.

Laurie Pearce, who sits on the Disaster Psychosocial Services Council of BC, explains that neither the provincial or federal government have a dedicated emergency service they can deploy. It won't be like you see on the news after a disaster in the United States where FEMA and the National Guard arrive on the scene immediately.

Pearce reminds us that Canada's military is small with very little presence in B.C. They'd have to deploy from Alberta and land in Abbotsford where, fingers crossed, the airport tarmacs are still intact.

The Red Cross and Salvation Army will be helping she says, but they won't have enough volunteers to respond to everyone's needs. "The government will not be there to help you. It just cannot be there," says Pearce.

In terms of emergency response, Pearce says coordination is something both the federal and provincial governments will be able to help with, but providing direct services will be up to non-governmental organizations. Basically, we'll be on our own and given how well the city copes with a light snowfall it will be a rough few weeks and months.

"Our (government's) response mechanism is to look at volunteers going to open up reception centres for people that can't go back to their homes. But then after that, there is no real plan."

VICE contacted Public Safety Canada but they declined interview requests.

Callihoo will be ready to spring into action when the big one hits. After making sure her daughters are safe, Callihoo says she'll head to Trout Lake Community Centre. As the leader for Vancouver's Zone C volunteer emergency response team, Callihoo will help set up a check-in centre, command centre, a designated room for young families, a room where people can stay with their pets, and a medical area. According to Vancouver's response plan, the community centre's ice-rink will also serve as a temporary morgue.

Once the muster station is set-up volunteers will start in on the "neighbourhood sweep." Callihoo estimates the sweeps will begin within six hours of the first impact.

During the sweeps, volunteers will go house by house to assess damage and flag homes where people are trapped. "We are there to observe, to listen, to record and report. Really what it does is it saves a number of steps for the EMS (Emergency Medical Services) folks," she says, adding that they'll be able tell firefighters and paramedics what areas are most desperate for help.

Callihoo's team currently has seven people on it, but she imagines needing over 100 people to cover her zone. She's wants to grow her team of pre-trained volunteers, but says day-of volunteers will be welcomed."I'd quickly train them and get their asses out there," she says.

If you're trapped under furniture in your house, you should make sure that people can hear you calling for help. Callihoo says she's been trained not to enter homes because of liability issues, but she'll probably go inside and help people anyway.

At that point, Callihoo says she would put a coloured sticker on the door saying immediate help is needed and then phone 911 to report an injured person.

"'Standby,' is what they would tell us. That's as far as it goes," she says.

If you're sick or dying, it's likely your friends, family or neighbours will be the ones to transport you to your neighbourhood's medical station or a makeshift morgue.

"Most of the people who get brought to hospitals in disasters are not brought by ambulances. They're brought by neighbours and friends and those around them," Pearce says.

Pearce says that in a disaster, communities come together and crime rates actually drop. "Most people do not panic. That's a myth. Most people act purposefully. They check themselves, they check their family and friends...and most people go to help others where they possibly can," she says.

Once the life-or-death emergencies of the first 72 hours slow down, Clague says our attention over the next weeks and months will turn to billions in financial losses. Deltaport, one of western Canada's biggest ports, could be one of the biggest source of losses, putting hundreds of people out of work if out of commission.

"Deltaport is built out on tidal flats of the Fraser River delta—there's a roadway and a rail line that transports bulk cargo out to the edge where the the deep water starts," says Clague. "There's a fair chance in a worst-case earthquake that the terminus would be damaged, and you wouldn't be able to get ships in or out. Until that could be repaired, you have a major problem for economic recovery."

A recent Globe and Mail report found the whole country would feel the economic shockwaves for years to come. "In the extreme scenario that I'm concerned about," CEO Charles Brindamour of one of Canada's biggest property insurance companies told the Globe, "I think that it is not a stretch of the imagination to think that an economic area could lose a decade rebuilding."

How to Pay Off Your Student Loans When You're Young and Broke

$
0
0

Photo by Will Standish

Most people think they don't know how the student loans system works, but the truth is, the system doesn't really work at all. Over 40 percent of borrowers no longer make payments, and the rest of us have sold our futures to pay for our groceries.

But if Donald Trump has taught me anything, it's this: Debt is always negotiable, and sometimes even optional. You just have to know the rules.

"President Obama passed many wonderful loan programs to assist student borrowers with their federal student loans," Stephen Dunne, a Philadelphia-based debt attorney, told VICE. These loans allow a graduated student loan borrower to pay a percentage of their income for approximately 20 years. Then, all the loans get erased."

Federal loans account for the vast majority of student debt. After the Great Recession destroyed all our futures, Obama decided to make up for it by creating programs that would encourage college grads to not just default.

"The most popular one is Income-Based Repayment," said Dunne. "Another one is called Pay As You Earn."

What these programs do is charge you a low monthly fee based on your discretionary income (the amount of your paycheck leftover after paying taxes and necessities like rent and food), and forgive the debt if it hasn't been paid off in 20 to 25 years. If you're really broke, you could be paying monthly payments of zero for 20 years until the debt is gone. And that's without fucking up your credit.

The thing is, according to Dunne, "about 99 percent of students that are eligible have no idea this exists."

Before these laws were passed, Helena Haze (who asked that VICE not print her real name) spent 15 years on "forbearance," meaning her payment was delayed while her student debt accumulated in interest, from about $48,000 to $68,000.

"So much interest," Haze told VICE. "But I chose not to care, because I thought I'd never pay, and because for a long time making payments wasn't really in my budget anyway. So 'Hey, I don't have any cash, my rent costs this much, I gotta eat, what can we do?' And they will usually find a payment plan."

Even if you can't pay, as long as you have an arrangement, your credit won't suffer.

"Don't try to be the hero who picks up five extra shifts so you can pay that loan; be the negotiator who calls Sallie Mae and says, 'Hey, I need some help,'" Haze advised. "Once they sell your paper to the debt collectors, it's out of their hands. And that's when you get into wrecking your credit."

There are also programs like the Public Service Loan Forgiveness Program, which excuses debt for people working in public service. Say you graduated and started teaching urban youths to rap about Shakespeare, or got a government job. As long as you're working for a nonprofit with a 503(c)(3) tax designation—with some exceptions—you can have your loan forgiven after ten years of monthly payments.

But these programs only apply to federal loans. Private lenders like Wells Fargo and Sallie Mae don't give a rat's ass whether you're teaching Liberian children or not. The downside to private loans is they tend to have higher interest rates, but the upside is they're easier to ditch.

According to Dunne, there are two main options with private loans: "First, what you can do with private loans is deal with them directly. Basically tell them what your income expenses are and try to strike a deal to get a monthly payment."

When a loan lender representative calls you, it's actually in their interests to do exactly that.

"If they get me on a plan, they did their job," said Haze, who after 15 years of negotiating developed quite a flare. "If I can't pay and they can't get me on a plan, it's not good for the person on the phone either. Because when they sell that debt to collections they get pennies on the dollar, so even partial payment from me is better than nothing."

Haze recommended being pushy, but polite.

"Notice the person's name when they answer the phone and call them by it. Be super nice and say things like, 'Gosh, I am so hoping you can help me!' and they'll help. And if they won't help, hang up and call back," said Haze. "It's a call center, you'll get a different person."

If negotiation fails, though, Dunne says you can try ignoring them, since there's a statute of limitations on private debt. If, say, you took out a loan in Pennsylvania, where the statute of limitations is four years, and the lender sued, you could get the case dismissed if four years had passed.

"I would basically plead the statute of limitations, and the judge would simply dismiss the case," said Dunne. "And now you're free of private student loans."

I asked Bruce McClary, a former student loan lender who now works in PR for the National Foundation for Credit Counseling, if there were any consequences to doing exactly that.

"The one consequence there is that they would have to rebuild their damaged credit," McClary told VICE. "If they cannot find you in order to serve you, then you can't be served."

Lenders use a process called "skiptracing" to track down debtors, whereby people are tracked down through credit card records or even magazine subscriptions. But if, say, you moved abroad and waited for the statute of limitations to expire, you'd be in the clear.

And in certain states—Pennsylvania, North Carolina, South Carolina, and Texas—private debt collectors aren't legally allowed to garnish your wages. So the sole consequence would be destroyed credit.

"I'm pretty sure it fucked my credit 'cause my credit's fucked," said Loreta Gomez (not her real name), who defaulted on her loans in 2011. "But I don't have the strong desire to go into debt and buy things."

Gomez makes much of her income as a contractor, buying things with cash and finding apartments through personal relationships. She described student debt as a "paper tiger."

"I don't actually feel limited in any capacity," Gomez told VICE. "I'm just operating within a different set of rules."

Each choice comes with its own risk: Paying nothing on your federal loans now means that interest will accumulate, which could force you to pay through the nose if you get a decent job in the next 25 years. Damaging your credit could compromise your ability to get a mortgage on a house. But the worst possibility is probably already happening, which is suffering in a terrible job and forking over too much of your paycheck to pay back your loans.

As for Haze, her plan is to just renegotiate her growing debt every year until she dies.

"That, or win the lottery," said Haze. "I'll totally pay off my loans if I win the lottery."

Follow Michaela Cross on Twitter.

Is Lying to Get Laid a Form of Sexual Assault?

$
0
0

Illustration by Stephanie Santillan

Joyce Short was young and single, enjoying a thriving career on Wall Street, when she went out with some friends to a bar after work. She met a "very handsome, debonair young man" who seemed perfect for her: Jewish, single, with a degree in accounting from NYU. She would learn much later, after they had begun dating, that none of this was true. Now, she has a mission: she wants to show people the seriousness of what she calls "rape by fraud."

"I am going to shout it from every rooftop," Short told VICE. "All lies that undermine a person's self-determination regarding their reproductive organs are a form of assault."

Most of us have played with the truth or held back information about ourselves to impress someone—white lies, like "Yeah, I thought Interstellar was brilliant too!" or "What a coincidence, I also love winter hiking!" Short is not alone, however, in thinking that such lies can sometimes cross a line. And as the law stands in America, cases like Joyce's—in which someone deceives their partner to get them into bed—are not illegal.

In 2013, Tom Dougherty, a philosophy professor at Cambridge University, published a paper arguing that if you lie or withhold information about anything that would be considered a deal-breaker by your partner—anything that, had they known it, would have changed their mind about sleeping with you—you have sexually assaulted them. The logic is simple: If your partner had known the truth beforehand, they wouldn't have consented, and the sex wouldn't have happened. Therefore, there was no consent. And sex without consent is assault. Fiona Elvines, of the UK national charity Rape Crisis, put this view bluntly to the Telegraph in 2014: "If you need to trick someone into having sex with you, you're a perpetrator."

The deal-breaker view is based on the powerful idea that free and open consent is an absolute requirement for all sexual activity. President Obama has, for instance, launched the "It's On Us" campaign, aimed at teaching people that all non-consensual sex is assault. But for consent to be free and open, it seems that it should also be fully informed. That's the standard we hold people to in medicine and business—why not sex? As the Anti Violence Project at the University of Victoria explained, "Informed consent means that someone who is being asked for their consent has full information about what they are being asked to consent to." In other words, we should have all the information that we consider relevant before getting into bed with someone.

Joyce Short wants us to go further than moral condemnation. "Lying to induce sex is not seduction, it's a crime," she told VICE. After her experience, Short has become vocal about the need to reclassify lying to one's sexual partner as a form of criminal sexual assault. Jed Rubenfeld, a professor at Yale, recently argued in the Yale Law Journal that this view is the logical outcome of the importance we now place on fully-autonomous consent as a precondition to sexual activity.

Some lawmakers agree. Today, American laws generally make two kinds of sexual deception illegal: cases where someone impersonates a person's partner (by sneaking into their bedroom at night, for instance), and cases where someone such as a doctor tricks a patient into thinking a sex act is actually some sort of medical procedure. Legislators in two states have proposed broadening the law to make it illegal, as Short thinks it should be, to deceive someone to get them into bed: An assemblyman in Massachusetts proposed such a law in 2008, as did a New Jersey legislator in 2014. Both proposals were defeated. However, as the national dialogue around sexual assault continues, there may well be similar attempts in the future.

But others have concerns over the push to criminalize sexual deception. First, if we do make sexual deception criminal, it would give enormous power to police and prosecutors to regulate our sexual lives—for example, to draw the line when it comes to determining exactly what separates a white lie from true deception. "If we are going to invite the criminal justice system to adjudicate relationships, I don't think the result is going to be a good one," Kim Buchanan, a criminal justice researcher in Connecticut who has spoken publicly on the issue, told VICE.

Second, if we move to prosecute sexual deception, those targeted will likely be people who are already vulnerable or stigmatized. It is revealing that in the United States, one very specific, additional form of sexual deception is aggressively criminalized and prosecuted: the failure to disclose one's HIV status to your partner. As the Center for HIV Law and Policy has documented, nearly every state has prosecuted people for HIV non-disclosure. No equivalent laws criminalize the failure to disclose diseases that are much easier to transmit, such as herpes. "There are no public health reasons to single out this particular deception," said Buchanan, who published a paper last May documenting the history of HIV prosecutions in the US.

There have also been cases of people prosecuted for so-called "gender fraud"—lying about, or failing to disclose, their birth gender to sexual partners. Sean O'Neill was convicted of this in Colorado in 1996, and, while his case proved an isolated one in the US, there has been an upsurge of such prosecutions in the UK, with five people convicted since 2012.

Consent must continue to be at the forefront of all discussions about right and wrong when it comes to sex. But as the problem of sexual deception—and the ire of victims like Short—shows, for American courts, many thorny problems remain to be solved when it comes to self-disclosure and sexual ethics.

Neil McArthur is the director of the Centre for Professional and Applied Ethics at University of Manitoba, where his work focuses on sexual ethics and the philosophy of sexuality. Follow him on Twitter.

What It's Like to Finally Sleep with Your Long-Term Crush

$
0
0

The skateboarder and the rollerblader. Illustration by Sophie Wolfson

The sad truth about existence is that you don't get to sleep with most of the people you fancy. Unless you're a professional athlete or Drake, most of your crushes will stay unfulfilled.

Every now and again, though, the universe does you a solid and you get to hook up with the person you've been secretly in love with for months, years, maybe even your whole life. But how does it actually feel when you're finally with someone you've fantasised about having sex with for longer than you can remember? Is it the best feeling in the world, or the ultimate disappointment? I spoke to some lucky (and also unlucky) people who managed to sleep with a long-term crush, with varying degrees of success.

HUGO, 27

VICE: So who was she?
Hugo: Basically where I grew up there were the skateboarders and the rollerbladers; I was a skateboarder and she was a rollerblader.

Like Romeo and Juliet?
Well, we were friends, but I had always fancied her; however she was obviously going out with a rollerblader.

When did you get your lucky break?
I moved away for a while, and when I came back she called me out of the blue and was like "I've run away from home, can I stay with you tonight?" I was home alone and obviously just said, "fuck yes." She came round and we were just lying in the same bed and chatting. Eventually I decided to kiss her – as soon as I did that she just went full turbo and we started fucking pretty soon after. It was actually my first time but she didn't know that.

What was it like being naked with someone you've known for ages?
It was dark and I didn't get to see much to be honest. However I had always thought she had the best backside ever and that night I realised I was right. I guess rollerblading is good for your glutes.

How did you feel afterwards?
I was literally over the moon, both because I was finally losing my virginity and also because I had wanted to have sex with this girl forever and now I was actually doing it. Also in my teenage naivety I thought it meant that she actually liked me, I soon found out I was wrong.

What happened the next morning?
We got dressed and started heading out, and as we were walking down the stairs she turns to me and says, "Sorry about last night, obviously it meant nothing to me and I don't like you but I was just lonely, you know? But thanks for the fuck." It's been over 10 years but I'm pretty sure that's word for word.

Oof, that's rough. How was your self-esteem after that?
Yeah I was just diminished to nothing. Then I spent the whole day hanging out with her while she hit on my friend. I tried to tell him what had happened but he didn't even believe me.

I'm guessing there was not round two?
I haven't spoken to her again since that day. But it was a good introduction to the world of sex. I had sex for the second time ever a week later with someone else.

ALICE, 26

VICE: How did you meet?
Alice: We worked together, sort of. I work in HR so he's technically my employee and so it's not really the done thing. But there's no actual rule against it.

You're in HR and you slept with your employee? Scandalous. How did you end up getting together?
When I first met him, I was in a long-term relationship that wasn't in a good place. This guy was extremely good-looking and charming. He knew I was in a relationship but didn't really care and had been trying to coax me into bed for a while. When I broke up with my boyfriend a few months later, I thought he would be the perfect rebound so texted him just telling him that I would go over to his after work.

Bold.
Yeah. When I got there he'd cooked dinner and got a nice bottle of red. We started hooking up but I left after about an hour of heavy making-out because I didn't want him to think I was too easy.

So when did it actually happen?
About a month later I decided to just go for it. I went to his and this time there is no dinner, no wine, nothing. We went upstairs to his room and he laid on his front and asked me to give him a massage. This dude's back is about the same size as my whole body but I gave it a go. After an hour of foreplay just for him we started having sex and he came after two minutes. He barely even touched me.

Did you stay?
I was so disappointed – especially after how hot the first night had been. I texted my friend who lived close by and pretended I had to leave due to an emergency.

Did it ever happen again?
He texted me like a week later and was like, "How could you leave me in the middle of the night, I want to be with you." Even though I shouldn't have, I gave it another go about two months after. He was more attentive but I just wasn't really that into him by this point. I kicked him to the curb and got back with my ex soon after.

CHARLIE, 28

VICE: How long had you been crushing?
Charlie: I met her at university. I was told she had a crush on me but we were both in "serious relationships" so nothing ever really developed. But there was always something there and our paths would cross from time to time. Five years later I got a totally trivial message from her out of the blue while I was at work, one thing led to another and we ended up going for drinks the same evening. I was so fucking stoked, I'd had a secret crush on her for what seemed like forever and she was pretty much everything I look for in a girl: looks, personality, music taste, the whole package.

Did you go home together that night?
We went on a few more dates before we eventually slept together. When it happened it was amazing. I felt like I'd won the gold medal in long-term crushing or some shit.

How did it finally happen?
We went to a Vietnamese place near my house, had a cheap date and then went back to mine where we had that awkward "time on the bed before shit goes down" time. Then shit went down.

Was the sex weird or just great?
It wasn't weird at all. I felt like Joseph Gordon Levitt in that scene from 500 Days of Summer.

Did it work out between you two?
We dated for a few months and then one night she told me over Facebook chat that she wasn't looking for anything serious. A romance that spanned half a decade and it was killed in an instant over FB Messenger.

MONICA, 24

VICE: Tell me about your slow-burning romance.
Monica: He was a good friend's ex. A couple of years after their relationship ended he starting hanging around with my extended group of friends and I had the biggest crush on him for about a year. In the last couple of months there had been so much tension between us: secret winks, holding hands and just general flirting, but I had also been hooking up with his oldest friend about a year before, so it was so complicated.

Who finally made the move?
One night, about a week before I was going to Thailand for two months, I bumped into him at a club. We were dancing together and he was complimenting me and buying me drinks, the full works. After that he disappeared for hours, then towards the end of the night he walked straight up to me and started kissing me and it was literally electric. Turned out the reason he had disappeared was because he'd been frantically trying to get through to his friend to bless the situation – he even called his brother!

Committed. Did you head straight back to yours when the club closed?
Yeah. We banged non-stop all night long, until it was daylight and beyond. We went to sleep for like an hour but I couldn't sleep because I couldn't believe he was in my bed. The next day I had to sneak him out of my house while my dad was in the shower so he just took my number and bolted.

How is it different to sleeping with someone new?
It's so much more intense because there was such a build-up of tension, and also so much physical and mental attraction that it was just explosive.

Did you hook up again?
He waited for me to return from my two-month trip away and we were together and madly in love for two years. He's still the only person I've really properly fancied.

BOBBY, 30

VICE: How did you meet?
Bobby: She was a famous actress – well, she still is. We met through mutual friends, first at a dinner and then like six months later at a party. I'd had a crush on her ever since I'd seen her in a movie a few years back.

How did you end up hooking up?
We were out partying and I was drunk so I told her that I saw her in a movie and thought she was stunning. She liked it and we ended up having a long chat and then she asked me to leave with her. We made out in the cab all the way back to hers and it was so good.

What happened when you got back to hers?
We continued drinking and finished off a bottle of champagne between us, then started to have sex.

It was the worst sex of my life, I was so disappointed...

How was the sex?
We started to have sex on the couch but it was small and leather so it didn't go very well – I kept getting stuck to it. We tried to go to the bedroom but we were both wasted and on the way she bumped into a lamp and broke it – then she got really sad and weird because it had belonged to her dead grandma. Me and my boner did not give a shit about the lamp but I could tell that she was thinking about it while we were fucking so the sex was so bad. We tried a few different things but nothing was really working and she left the bed to go and collect the lamp pieces off the floor halfway through. After that we smoked a joint and then I left. It was the worst sex of my life, I was so disappointed.

How did you feel afterwards?
So bad, I actually had a girlfriend at the time so I felt fucking terrible.

Did you ever see her again?
She texted me a few days later and we arranged to go on a date but the vibe was so weird. I decided it wouldn't be a good idea to try again. Now I just see her on movie posters everywhere.

STEPHANIE, 23

VICE: Where did you meet?
Stephanie: I met her at a NYE party years ago and fell in love instantly but she had a girlfriend who hated me and stared at me all night from across the room. The magnetism was insane, I'd never seen this girl before and until this point I considered myself to be straight. I'd never really thought about fucking a girl but as soon as I saw her I bounded over like a lovestruck puppy and introduced myself.

How much time passed before it went down?
Honestly I thought about her for years. I added her on Facebook and every time she popped up I'd spend like 20 minutes looking at her profile like a creep. I was obsessed. After about three years, I posted that I needed a driver for an advert I was directing and she replied. I had a total meltdown about what to wear and spent three days unashamedly flirting with her instead of working. On the last night of the shoot I got her super drunk and we snogged.

It was like losing my virginity again


Did you sleep together the same night?
It then took us another eight months. We happened to be in NYC at the same time and decided to stay in the same apartment. After a night out, we both came back to the apartment super-drunk. She climbed in the shower and I just stripped off and jumped in after her. We were just kind of fucking around and washing each other's hair and stuff – it was kind of bound to happen but we were both being cautious I think because she knew I hadn't been with a girl before and I was scared. Then we started kissing and I was losing my shit – I wanted to lose myself in a moment of passion but I was being so calculated because I didn't want to fuck up. All those years of build-up to this explosive moment and then I'm just thinking, 'Err okay lol I guess I'll put my hand HERE.' We spent the rest of the night banging, or in my case, working out how to bang. It was like losing my virginity again.

How did it feel to finally be with her?
It was like rediscovering your entire sexual identity in your 20s. Everything I knew about the male body and sex and pleasure was suddenly irrelevant and it was all really strange. Even though I'm incredibly liberal, the years it took me to overcome whatever strange fear or bizarre perception I had about my sexuality made it really intense when it finally clicked.

Did you have sex with her again?
Multiple times, for years. We're still incredibly close, but just as friends.

SYLVIE, 23

VICE: Who were you crushing on?
Sylvie: My friend was doing an art foundation course and I met this guy through him. I was into him immediately, he had curly hair and an air of mystery about him. I tried my usual tricks and made an effort to go to any art school party I thought he'd be at, but nothing worked. I was a lot younger than him at the time.

Was he waiting until you were older?
I don't know, he always gave off a vibe that I wasn't cool or "art school" enough for him. But two years later another friend of mine was having a house party and it turned out he was coming. I was thinking 'this is my time!' so I put on an all-black outfit and decided to try my luck one last time.

We were fully mid-fuck when suddenly he jumped up and ran to be sick

How did it go?
We talked a lot at the party but I don't remember the details. He told me he'd got some nice weed in and invited me back to his. I was basically jumping for joy inside at the prospect of finally fucking my crush while stoned. The dream.

How was the sex?
We were smoking and things started to get steamy – we were fully mid-fuck when suddenly he jumped up and ran to be sick. He spent a good hour in there while I lay there thinking 'oh god he won't wanna finish now.' He then returned looking more sorry than embarrassed. He passed out next to me, and I smoked his weed until I passed out too.

Was it good before he puked?
I think it was only good because I'd fantasised about him so much previously. I was so caught up in this fantasy while fucking him I probably convinced myself it was good, when actually it was really fucking shit.

What happened in the morning?
He didn't offer me breakfast, just walked me to the door. We both stood there in awkward silence until he said "should I take your number?" I told him there was no need. All in all, a complete let-down. I never saw him again.

More on VICE:

We Asked People in Long-Term Relationships About Their Fantasies of Being Single

Is Porn Really Turning Us into Craven Sexless Zombies?

What It Feels Like When Your Partner Cheats On You With Someone You Know



NSFW Photos of the Secretive Orgies in Manchester's $60 Hotel Rooms

$
0
0

Joseph Finegan is keen for everyone to know he's just a normal guy who works at a nightclub and takes photographs in his spare time. It's just that those photographs happen to be of guys having secretive sex parties, arranged through Craigslist and held in Manchester's cheap hotels.

Last year, we asked Joe to write about his experience of taking the photos, and he got back in touch recently to let us know he's releasing a book of his work. That book – Do Not Disturb – is out today, and Joe's holding a pop-up exhibition at Doomed Gallery in Dalston tonight to celebrate its launch.

To see what's changed in the year since we last heard from him, I gave him a call for a catch-up.

VICE: Hi Joseph. So you wrote about your project for us last year. Why turn it into a book now?
Joseph Finegan: I think if I didn't make a book I'd just keep doing it – there would be no end result. So I thought, 'If I make a book, maybe I can just stop. I can put it to bed.' It's something I can take a hold of and know it's done; it's been documented.

So you want to stop taking these kinds of photos?
I maybe want to take it down a different route. It's funny – I had this conversation with a friend, who was saying that, to me, it might be the end, but to a lot of other people who haven't seen my images before it is just the beginning. So maybe I should carry on a bit longer because I've spent two years basically trying to tap into a community – to find my way into a group of real people. It would probably be a waste to throw that away.

What will you take photos of instead?
Before I started, I just wanted to go down a route no one had done before. I did do cam-girls for a little while, and then I wanted to maybe get into photographing swingers or dogging. Then again, I don't really want to just make it all about sex. I might just do something really nice – take photos of flowers, or something. But to be honest it'll probably end up being predominantly sex based. It's just interesting to show something people don't see everyday.

One thing that occurred to me when looking at the photos: is it hard, or a bit awkward at least, getting your film developed?
Yeah, once I went in to pick my film up and the guy was like, "We couldn't develop this," and gave it straight back to me. I left, half-walked into Boots, and was like, 'That's not even worth a try.' Luckily there's this lovely old lady who I've been seeing for the past two years. She obviously sees the photos I do, but is still so innocent, like, "I've got them funny pictures for you!" and I'm just like, "Oh, what am I like!" Ninety-nine percent of people wouldn't develop them – she's great.

Has your method changed much since you started?
I used to just post "does anyone want their photograph taken" on Craigslist, and then turn up to people's houses – how dangerous is that? I've been doing it for two years, but when I first started I was really naive. I just wanted that one fucking crazy shot. But then I started going to a hotel instead. It's funny, because my friend worked at the hotel for a short period of time, and it's so dated – it's like going back in time. There's also loads of prostitution and there have been a couple of suicides, too, so not a very nice place to actually stay in. I wouldn't sleep over at the end of my shoot, put it that way.

What's the vibe like in the room? Are the guys not wary about you being there?
What's in the book now, that's two years of trial and error. You learn to be a certain way in that situation to get the picture right. The main thing for me is eye contact – if someone is looking back at you, it really stands out. But trying to get in for that shot; let's say it lasts for like an hour – you just have to take a back seat and wait for them to get lost in their own little world, and then step in. It's usually me just hovering around the edges of the room. The whole process took a long time to get right.

Does anything ever go wrong?
There have been a few times when I've turned up and I've ran out of film, or my camera runs out of battery, and then I just have to hang out and wait for them all to finish, literally. Or the amount of times I've booked a room and no one's turned up, or even worse when just one person's turned up. They're like, 'Is anyone else coming?' Or someone will turn up, I'll be like, "Y'alright?" and they'll just run off. But over time you get regulars. There's one lovely guy who emails me all the time, and every time he turns up he buys me a crate of beers, which is nice. But there's not many other nice experiences, really. I don't make any friends out of it.

Do you think your experiences have changed your own attitude towards sex?
Well, I'm so removed from it in the sense that I don't ever get involved. The amount of times a close friend will be like, "Have you ever just done..." and I'm like, "No!" It's not something I ever bring into my own personal life. But maybe it has changed me over the years. I guess I'm desensitised because I've seen it all. But I don't think there's a personal reason for me to do this – no personal expression of any kind. It's more of a document – something I've worked really hard towards – to show something completely unseen.

What do the people in your life think about what you do?
I remember showing my parents, who didn't really understand it – they just think it's what the young kids are all doing these days, I guess. I think I understand that it's a bit weird. Like, the last VICE headline – "Photographing Britain's Anonymous Sex Parties" – made me sound like all I do is travel around doing this. I sort of wanted it to say at the end, "By the way, he just works at a nightclub and has a couple of mates."

We'll let people know this time, Joseph. Thanks!

@josephfinegan__

More on VICE:

Meet the Man Behind London's Biggest 'Elite' Sex Parties

Savile Row Sex Parties: Inside One of London's Suit Fetish Nights

The Very Worst Sex You've Ever Had

The VICE Guide to the 2016 Election: The Myth of Donald Trump’s Black Voter Outreach

$
0
0

So Donald Trump is polling with a favorability rating of zero percent among African Americans in the latest national survey from Public Policy Polling, which should come as a surprise to exactly no one. The man has exhibited racist behavior for a long, long time, from systematically discriminating against blacks in housing rentals and at Trump casinos, to inciting hatred in the racially-charged rape case of the Central Park jogger, to his more recent embrace of birtherism and disparaging remarks about Mexican immigrants made during the current presidential campaign. And we all know he loves to tweet, and has been known to recirculate messages from white nationalists and Nazi sympathizers.

Now Trump has seemingly come to the realization that he's actually turning off a significant portion of white voters with all of this racial animus, and has started to make token efforts to reach out and engage black people—mostly in all white neighborhoods. His motivation, as some have argued, is only to gain more white votes.

"You're living in poverty, your schools are no good, you have no jobs, 58 percent of your youth is unemployed. What the hell do you have to lose?" he asked in a recent speech, ostensibly addressing black voters while speaking in the lily-white suburb of Dimondale, Michigan.

But as with almost everything related to Trump, his self-serving diatribes are rooted more in fiction than in fact. While poverty and inadequate education remain a concern among many black voters, the unemployment rate among black youth, though still too high, is less than half of the figure Trump cites.

"Look, it is a disaster the way African Americans are living," Trump continued. "We'll get rid of the crime. You'll be able to walk down the street without getting shot. Right now, you walk down the street, you get shot." But again, his caricatures of crime in black communities are little more than lies intended to fire up anger and mobilize those whites currently on the fence about supporting a Republican candidate that they see as racist.

Indeed, in spite of his supposed efforts to engage black voters, Trump lately seems to be doing all he can to continue to push racial buttons and stoke the coals of racist white resentment, from suggesting that NFL quarterback Colin Kaepernick "find a country that works better for him"—a comment that contains shades of "go back to Africa"—to interjecting his opinion about black crime in the wake of the tragic murder of NBA star Dwyane Wade's cousin.

The most disturbing aspect of all this is not that Trump has become an enemy to the non-white electorate, but that his candidacy serves to all but guarantee black and Latino support for the Democratic Party, further allowing that party to take us for granted, taking away any reason they might have to need to address the issues that we are concerned about.

The only silver lining to this mess is perhaps that the counter-accusations of racism Trump has leveled against Democrats may force them to at least marginally deal with the issues of race upon which the party has been silent for far too long. Criminal justice reform, for instance, has finally become a concern for the party this election cycle, but there is still much room for debate on issues like police terrorism, mass incarceration, affordable housing, education, and the need for better job opportunities in poor and minority communities.

It seems that Trump's approach is now to not only insult, but to divide and conquer the very communities that he has never seemed to concerned with in the first place. He has anchored this strategy around the issue of immigration—the ultimate political dog whistle. We hear it often, and it's always ugly: His call to "Make America Great Again" has come to exemplify the thinly veiled racism embedded in the nationalist rhetoric and anger that has come to define his presidential campaign. Since the start of his campaign, Trump has relentlessly trumpeted that unauthorized immigration is increasing, that it yields upticks in violent crime, that it causes undue stress on our healthcare system, and that it unfairly increases job competition.

Of course, none of this is true. Illegal immigration is not increasing. A report released by the Pew Research Center last fall revealed that the unauthorized immigrant population in the United States had remained essentially stable for five years, and the number of Mexican immigrants—who make up 49 percent of those here illegally—has actually declined in recent years.

And, contrary to common right-wing lore, illegal immigration does not result in an increase in the violent crime rate. In October 2015, Newsweek reported that, "even though the number of undocumented immigrants doubled from 1994 to the record level of 12 million in 2007, the violent crime rate in America dropped 34 percent, and the property crime rate fell 26 percent." The Newsweek story went on to detail that Mexican immigrants, regardless of their legal status, had an incarceration rate equal to one-eighth of those born in the US, and maintained a rate "lower than that of American-born whites and blacks of similar socioeconomic status and education."

An analysis of the impact of unauthorized immigration on the US healthcare system yielded similar results. A report published by the Journal of General Internal Medicine last year detailed that undocumented immigrants contributed a surplus of $35.1 billion to a Medicare program known as the Hospital Insurance Trust fund (HITF) between 2000 and 2011, and that "unauthorized immigrants generated an average surplus of $316 per capita to the Trust Fund, while other Americans generated a deficit of $106 per capita."

The study further concluded that had unauthorized immigrants "not contributed to nor drawn HITF funds from 2000 to 2011, the HITF would become insolvent in 2029–1 year earlier than is currently predicted by Medicare's Trustees based on their intermediate cost assumptions."

The final, and perhaps most common myth—that illegal immigrants harm American workers—has also been rebuked, including by a recent Forbes article, which noted that "illegal immigrants actually raise wages for documented/native workers" by freeing up "low-skill American workers who can then specialize in tasks that require better English."

Given that all of this information is readily available from reputable sources, it can be rationalized that ongoing misconceptions about undocumented immigrants persist either as a result of blatant racism, or by a laziness of some to look beyond their comfort zone and get a real sense of the facts.

The focus I've put on Trump is not intended to give Hillary Clinton a pass—the Democratic nominee has clearly had her own issues with African Americans. It is intended, however, to rebuff the boogeyman narrative about non-whites that Trump willingly and repeatedly embraces. The reality is that both parties seem to only view minority concerns as inconvenient obstacles that need to be "managed" in an election year. So it's easy to see why many voters remain disillusioned with the current political system and the choices it offers.

Paris is a hip-hop artist and activist from the Bay Area. He's owned several businesses that never went bankrupt. Follow him on Twitter.

Hey Kids, Here's Why You Shouldn't Do Your Dream Job for a Living

$
0
0

Via KieranCVlogs

It would appear, readers, that in typical millennial fashion, our young people don't want to be doctors and teachers anymore. The sprogs of today don't want to grow up to split the atom or impart knowledge, no sir, they want computery jobs based around computers and such. This comes from Currys PC World – a suspect group to conduct a study whose conclusion is essentially 'your children desire gadgets and, who knows, maybe those gadgets will make them millionaires' – who commissioned a poll of 12-to-25-year-olds. Exactly 92 percent of them didn't want to follow in their parents' footsteps, which is not surprising because who wants to be an irate half-blind plumber living off milky tea and the promise of a Ram and Bitter.

But these jobs... Children, take it from me, you don't want these jobs. The job you think you want? You really don't. Unless you're going to be in the top one percent of people who do that job, in which case you should definitely go for it because you'll be rich as fuck. Otherwise, I think you should leave it out. I'm now going to explain to you why your occupation of choice is a bad fucking idea. I beg of you, heed these words! They will be in the order of desirability according to this poll. And, inexplicably, at number one is...

WRITER

This is a little ambiguous as a job title. Do the kids mean they want to be novelists, weaving tapestries of great tales and committing them to paper to be shared and passed down through the ages so those in the future can know what lays in your heart as intimately as your best friend? Or do they mean rewriting news stories and ad copy for a pernicious content farm that bases its entire business model on 'page engagements' and 'clickthroughs'? Or, perhaps, they want to be the intrepid tabloid journalist, breaking into the homes of murdered children to steal photos of them for scoops? Maybe they want to get into being a music writer, officially the world's most pointless job? Or blogging, the equivalent of flicking a Smartie into a swimming pool full of Smarties and asking the general public to pick yours out and call it delicious. It's a low-paid, low-rent, low-satisfaction job where the only currency is a couple of retweets every few weeks to stave off the inevitable move into marketing and advertising, where you will be treated like a genius and get loads more money, and spend the rest of your life wondering why you didn't just start off doing that in the first place.

YOUTUBE SENSATION

There are two reasons why all the most famous vloggers are famous right now and here they are: 1. They were in the right place at the right time, and 2. They pump out video after video after video until by the law of averages people will have to start watching them. You have to be massively industrious for this to work, and also have to offer something that all the other pricks haven't done yet. A Primark haul won't cut it in 2016; a makeup vlog or a trip to Thorpe Park is not going to make you famous like it used to. If you want to give it a go, your best bet is to catch one of the new trendy waves, like mental health or gender or something. Or you could routinely hurt yourself by eating chilli peppers and gluing your hand to your dick and that sort of thing. Also, why would you want to be one of those guys? They fucking suck.

ARTIST

Art doesn't mean what it used to any more guys, I hate to break it to you. You might think art is painting, or sculpture, or something more abstract, or, you know, art! But no, I'm afraid art has changed. Now art is a drawing of a character from Rick and Morty with a giant monster cock in their mouth and arse done on a cheap Wacom tablet. Now art is selfies, books full of them. It's a digital 3D Roman pillar on a wavy background with an ASCII Sonic the Hedgehog winking at you. It's impossible to be anything without it being picked apart a thousand times in the minutes after it's produced, by people like me AKA wankers.

The sort of photography you'll end up doing. Photo by Daniel Case via Wikipedia

PHOTOGRAPHER

Being a photographer can be pretty neat. You spend a lot of time with a subject of your choosing, develop your own style, learn a craft and then compile your work in the form a quirky photobook that only about 17 weirdos will care about. But let's face it, you're probably not creative or #cool enough for that. Your black-and-white photos of kebab shops in your small town aren't going to be as edgy as the black-and-white photos of the off license of your rival's small town. Being a photographer is essentially a battle to see who can take the most edgy black-and-white photo of grimy provincial life as possible. Ten points if you can capture a fat shirtless man drinking a can of Tennents on a curb, 100 points if you get a child looking down the lens smoking a fag.

CLOTHES DESIGNER

This is actually the most viable one on the list. The fashion industry is still ridiculous enough for anyone to be anyone, that's why it's pretty cool, apart from all the anorexia and addiction issues imbued in its many silken fabrics. But you, millennial of choice, are best off finding a job for a high street chain where you can routinely trawl the internet for the hot fashions and trends du jour and then blithely rip them off just inside the rules of trading standards. Leave the thinking to everyone else, kid.

@joe_bish

More from VICE:

Activists Plastered the Tube with Posters Telling People Their Jobs Are Bullshit

We Asked People With the Most Right-Swiped Jobs on Tinder Why Their Job Makes Them So Fit

Every Job Could Be a Casualty of the Robot Revolution – Even Yours

Ava DuVernay's 'Queen Sugar' Is a Stunning Show About Black Lives on the Bayou

$
0
0

I remember seeing the first narrative feature film by Ava DuVernay, 2011's I Will Follow. I was a film student at CalArts, excited to drive down to LA to support a black female filmmaker I'd heard so much about. When I arrived, a long line overflowed from the Egyptian Theatre. I watched as DuVernay greeted friends and family in the line, glowing. That movie, about a successful black woman returning home to care for her cancer-ridden aunt, was personal, intimate, and unconcerned with mainstream film conventions. I couldn't remember the last time I'd seen a movie so attuned to the internal desires of a black woman, without falling back on sensationalism.

Premiering commercial-free on September 6, the new OWN TV series Queen Sugar brings back the work of DuVernay in novel and stunning ways, infusing it with strikingly personal rendering of story and image. Though adapted from a preexisting book, the first two episodes echo DuVernay's previous work in I Will Follow and 2012's Middle of Nowhere, films about black women who take on the loss of loved ones while also navigating complicated dynamics related to illness, incarceration, and familial discord.

In an era of endless displacement and redevelopment of urban cities and New Orleans itself, it's fascinating to watch a show about farmland owned by black people.

Queen Sugar is based on the novel of the same name by Donna Baszile, and DuVernay and her writing team have taken liberties with the source material to create a rich black family drama about three siblings— self-assured Charley (Dawn-Lyen Gardner), brooding Nova (Rutina Wesley), and troubled Ralph Angel Bordelon (Kofi Siriboe)—who inherit an 800-acre sugarcane farm in the wake of their father's death from a stroke. Each sibling is at a turning point in his or her own life—Ralph Angel, a formerly incarcerated father of a young son, Blue (Ethan Hutchinson), and Nova (who doesn't appear in the novel), a journalist having an affair with a married white detective.

Set against the sprawling fields and murky back-bayous of the New Orleans–surrounding parish Saint Josephine, Queen Sugar is also about land and about legacy. In an era of endless displacement and redevelopment of urban cities and New Orleans itself, it's fascinating to watch a show about land owned by black people. What does it mean to be a black landowner? How does this ownership inform one's identity? My father is from Louisiana, where his family also owned land. His stories of growing up, raising chickens, and running through fields are special to me because I've come of age in big cities, where people who look like me don't usually own much. This is the crux of the show: how to tend, how to preserve and love this land, which serves as a metaphor for the fragile familial bonds surrounding it. In a later episode, when a wealthy white farmer attempts to buy the land for less than it's worth, the Bordelons must decide if their family history is worth the sale, or if they will tend to it in their fractured state.

The pilot first shuttles between Louisiana and Los Angeles, where we are introduced to Charley, a beautiful, smart wife who manages her husband's basketball career, while being recruited for a popular reality TV series. When a scandal involving her husband erupts, her once pristine image is compromised. This storyline will strike a chord for many as it touches on sexual assault and consent, mirroring the recent Nate Parker headlines in an almost eerie fashion. Its addition into the narrative also allows DuVernay to work her magic with public and personal moments of betrayal, which she does so well in Middle of Nowhere.

In one of the pilot's most heightened scenes, Charley learns something about her husband during one of his games—the same husband who romanced her by their mansion pool the night before—and her reaction to this discovery is performed with a level of intensity that helps form the emotional core of the show. I was reminded of a similar scene in Middle of Nowhere, in which a med student learns that her incarcerated husband had an affair with a female prison guard. She learns this publicly, while sitting at his court hearing, beside her sister. DuVernay finds a way to fashion public revelations into daggers that cut at the soul of main characters, pushing them toward growth, discovery, and, occasionally, further destruction.

Nova, played with a calm, measured intensity by Wesley, appears to be the most grounded of the siblings, but her activism and ancestral traditions run counter to the impossibility of being the mistress of a white man. Ralph Angel, on the other hand, struggles to make a way for himself as a parolee, and as the father to a son of a recovering addict, Darla (Bianca Lawson), whom he still has a painful love for. Cast in blue light over the Alabama Shakes' "Gemini," he stands outside of her small trailer, drinking a can of beer before knocking on the door. She opens it, they stare at each other, and she unbuckles his pants. The sexual tension in this scene, and others, is lush, palpable. Ralph Angel is a troubled, pensive character whose pulsing interaction with two white men in the third episode will have viewers on the edge of their seats.

Although high-octane scenes like that one inject a needed urgency, the series favors a more cinematic, sensuous approach. Characters are often framed in shots with extra headroom, their environments looming large over their heads, like the history they dare to dig up after their father's death. DuVernay is a master of moments, of details, of the way light dances on brown skin, or the way three generations of black men embrace in a hospital room, their faces layered in natural light. These personal touches, which have been present in her work from the beginning, make this series distinct and well-timed for our current moment.

We are in a black artistic renaissance, and DuVernay and her team are leading a movement toward films and television that privilege black women's lives and innermost desires.

Follow Nijla Mu'min on Twitter.

Queen Sugar premieres on Tuesday, September 6 on OWN TV.

​The September Issue of VICE Magazine Is Now Online

$
0
0

Cover image by Stefanie Moshammer

Inside the September issue of VICE Magazine, you'll find stories about a ragtag group of reporters documenting the destruction of Cambodia's forests and being murdered for their efforts; a profile of Phoebe Robinson from 2 Dope Queens ; and a Q&A with Thomas Drake, an NSA whistleblower. We also have some fiction by Paul Maliszewski and the first story printed by JT Leroy—the author who scandalized the literary world. They're alongside Bruce Gilden's portraits from the Republican National Convention, Stefanie Moshammer's beautifully bright photos from Rio de Janeiro (she also shot our cover photo), and Michael Lundgren's portfolio of dark, supernatural landscapes from across the Midwest.

Meanwhile, Erika Eichelberger profiles Nicholas Heyward Sr., a man who became a mentor to the Black Lives Matter movement after a cop killed his 13-year-old son while he was playing cops and robbers in a public housing project in Gowanus, Brooklyn.

We report, too, on the effort to clear millions of Vietnam-era cluster bombs from the jungles the jungles of Laos, spend time in Nepal hunting for hallucinogenic honey, and break down alternative energy by the numbers.

There's much more... And don't forget: You can get the magazine (100-plus glossy pages) delivered to your doorstep each month by subscribing.

Get the VICE App on iOS and Android

The VICE Morning Bulletin

$
0
0

Everything you need to know about the world this morning, curated by VICE.

Philippines President Rodrigo Duterte. Photo by Jeoffrey Maitem/NurPhoto via Getty Images

US News

Obama Cancels Meeting with Duterte After Insult
President Obama has canceled a meeting with Philippines President Rodrigo Duterte after Duterte described him as a "son of a bitch." In a speech on Monday, the Philippines leader said: "Who does he think he is? I am no American puppet... Son of a bitch, I will swear at you." A Duterte spokesman said Tuesday morning he regretted that "it came across as a personal attack." —CNN

Clinton Turns Down Mexico Trip Invite
Hillary Clinton said she will not take up an invitation from Mexican president Enrique Peña Nieto to visit Mexico, describing Donald Trump's recent visit to the country as a "diplomatic incident." "We understand and respect her decision to propose the time to hold a meeting," said Mexican foreign minister Claudia Ruiz Massieu in a tweet. —Reuters

Cincinnati Overdose Spike Caused by Carfentanil
Police officials believe an unprecedented spike in overdoses in Cincinnati has been caused by synthetic drug carfentanil. More than 200 people in the area have overdosed in the past two weeks. Law enforcement is worried enough about this new danger that they've begun carrying overdose-reversing naloxone sprays in case they accidentally inhale some of the drug. —The New York Times

Black Lives Matter Forms Financial Partnership
The Black Lives Matter movement has established a legal and financial partnership with a California charity. The San Francisco–based International Development Exchange, also known as IDEX, now acts as the financial arm of the Black Lives Matter network, with the ability to receive grants and donations on the group's behalf. —ABC News

International News

Kabul Charity Hit by Gun Attack
Afghan security forces have ended an 11-hour siege at the offices of an aid group, Care International, in Kabul, killing all three attackers. The gunmen launched the attack late Monday night, just hours after a Taliban double-suicide bombing near the defense ministry building killed 35 people and a car bomb exploded in a different neighborhood. —Reuters

Protestors Block Calais Access Over Migrant Camp
French demonstrators blocked access to the port of Calais in France throughout Monday, protesting the government's failure to close the migrant camp known as the "Jungle." A blockade of 40 trucks, 50 tractors, and several hundred people forming a human chain across the roads came to an end on Monday night. —The Guardian

Ethiopia Prison Fire Leaves 23 Dead
At least 23 people died when a fire broke out at a prison in the Ethiopian capital of Addis Ababa. The blaze erupted at the high-security Qilinto prison, where many anti-government activists are held. According to a government statement, 21 died of suffocation in a stampede, while two others were killed as they tried to escape. —Al Jazeera

El Salvador Refuses Bribe to Fix World Cup Match
El Salvador's national football team claims to have refused a bribe ahead of Tuesday's World Cup 2018 qualifying game against Canada. The team members played an audio recording of the alleged match-fixer making the indecent proposal at a press conference. —BBC News

Everything Else

Beyoncé Postpones NJ Show to Rest Her Voice
The singer has been forced to postpone the next stop on her Formation World Tour after being told to rest her voice by a doctor. Wednesday's show at New Jersey's Metlife Stadium is now scheduled for October 7. —TIME

San Francisco 49ers Fire Bruce Miller After Arrest
The San Francisco 49ers have released fullback Bruce Miller after he was arrested on suspicion of assault. Miller was detained in connection with an alleged attack on a 70-year-old man and his son at a hotel in San Francisco on Sunday. —USA Today

Lost Robot Found on Comet
The European Space Agency has discovered Philae, the lost robot that landed on a comet two years ago before its batteries ran out. Images from a space probe camera have revealed the exact location of the Philae lander on comet 67P. —The Guardian

Italy Pulls Fertility Campaign After Outrage
The Italian government was forced to pull a poster campaign that encouraged women in Italy to keep an eye on their biological clock after it sparked outrage online. Featuring an anxious-looking woman holding an hourglass, the campaign was intended to encourage people to procreate in order to drive up the birth rate. —Broadly

Asteroid Named After Freddie Mercury
The International Astronomical Union (IAU) has officially changed named the name of Asteroid 17473, located in the asteroid belt between Mars and Jupiter, to "Freddiemercury." The former Queen frontman would have turned 70 this week. —Motherboard

Don't Ban Ketamine, Say Anesthesiologists
The World Federation of Societies of Anesthesiologists has demanded that ketamine is not placed under UN illicit drug restrictions. WFSA president Dr. Jannicke Mellin-Olsen said ketamine remains an essential anesthetic in countries "with limited options." — VICE


Get the VICE App on iOS and Android

Cambodian Journalists Are Dying Trying to Save the Country's Forests

$
0
0


Photos by Claire Eggers

This story appeared in the September issue of VICE magazine. Click HERE to subscribe.

By the time his wife worked up the courage to ask him to stay, Taing Try was almost asleep. The two were lying together on a mattress beneath the mosquito nets in their one-room stilt house in the bottomlands of eastern Cambodia. Across the room, they could hear their young daughter turning in her sleep, the sound of their water buffalos breathing beneath the house, the lumber trucks speeding down National Highway 7 and carrying their clandestine cargo to Vietnam.

Taing, 49, was a journalist who covered the logging of Cambodia's forests, a black market much like the international arms or drug trades. Cheam Mom, his wife, had watched with increasing unease as he left time after time, heading out to range the woods with camera and cellphone, looking for caches of illegal logs and the loggers who felled them. That night, in mid October 2014, she finally found her voice.

"I said, 'Sweetie, I'm very concerned about what you're doing,'" she later remembered. "'The work you do—you don't carry a gun. You can't protect yourself. Those businessmen you write about do have money. They do have guns. If they get mad at you, what are you going to do?'"

In Cambodia and across the remote forests of the world, a rising boom in the illegal sale of wood, land, and minerals has turned the environmental beat into a new sort of conflict journalism.

Taing said he wasn't worried, and that she shouldn't be either. His job, he said, was just another job. He wasn't going to get close enough to anyone to "touch" him or her. Cheam kept talking. Quit reporting, she begged. Come home. Work with me in our rice field. Help raise our daughter. After a while, she looked over and saw that Taing was asleep. The next day, Cheam woke relieved and unburdened. She went to the fields filled with a strange sense of peace.

But Taing had not been strictly honest with her. He left the house that morning and drove east toward the Province of Kratie, on the border of what remained of Cambodia's eastern forests. He headed for a place awash in money from the illegal sale of land, gems, and wood, a place where dirty cops and soldiers ran shadowy, heavily armed logging networks. Out there, in the dark, something went wrong. Two days after Taing left home, local peasants found his body facedown in the muck of a logging road, a bullet in the back of his head.

Taing's death, while tragic, was not unique. In Cambodia and in remote forests elsewhere, a rising boom in the illegal sale of wood, land, and minerals has turned the environmental beat into a new sort of conflict journalism. Since 2005, 40 journalists around the world have died while reporting these stories, more than all of the journalists killed covering America's war in Afghanistan. The dead have overwhelmingly been local reporters, like Taing, covering illegal mining or logging. They are largely independent, poorly educated, untrained, and despised by their nations' Establishment Media. Reporting on a violent, corrupt frontier, they are never sure when they'll cross a line and end up dead. Their lives in their hands, they head into the woods.

Taing Try's widow, Cheam Mom, holds her husband's press credential. Taing was murdered on October 12, 2014, while reporting on illegal logging operations in Kratie Province, Cambodia.

***

Two weeks after Taing's death, I headed into the forests of Kratie with my translator, Sinary Sany. She was a tiny firecracker of a woman in her early 30s who spoke a sublime and singular English that forced me to work through a process of double interpretation—Khmer to Sinary's English, Sinary's English to mine—that gave all of the interviews we did a level of the surreal, as though I were reporting from underwater. She was a land activist who had worked as a journalist at the English-language Cambodia Daily. The prospect of her being a reporter had so terrified her mother that eventually she had taken a transfer to the paper's business department. "Were you threatened?" I asked when she told me this. "No," she said, shrugging. "They only beat me once. It was nothing."

If you head east on National Highway 7 away from Tbong Khmum, the village where Taing lived, and toward the forests where he died, you cross a land in the middle of a great transformation. It was October, but the weather was scorching. The sun beat down on peasants sucking water from irrigation canals to pour over their rice paddies, or bringing crops out on the backs of bicycles. Without the water buffalos and the conical hats, it could have been Faulkner's Mississippi: a region dotted with settlements of rough-cut wooden houses, where kids tended scrawny livestock on the banks of wide, lazy rivers. And, increasingly, foreign-owned plantations: As we ventured in the direction of Snuol, the highway passed rubber and cassava plantations so large that the lines of crops converged at the horizon.

A driver traveling down this same road 40 years ago—rattling over mud and stones—would have passed a very different scene. As recently as the early 1970s, three-quarters of Cambodia was covered in dense primary forest that stretched across most of Southeast Asia, from the mountains of Papua New Guinea to Burma. The country was still shaded then by a canopy of acacia and mahogany, broken here and there by the tops of rosewood trees.

But rosewood—like the rich soil it grows in—is valuable, part of a suite of tropical hardwoods known in Cambodia as "luxury wood," used to make fine furniture and musical instruments. As Cambodia's neighbors, like China and Vietnam, have risen into major regional or global powers, their demand for expensive hardwoods and farmland for plantation agriculture has skyrocketed. By ax and chainsaw, by motorbike and transport truck, by broad daylight and cover of night, Cambodia's forests have been disappearing, vanishing into clandestine sawmills and warehouses, speeding across the border into Vietnam. More than 85 percent of Cambodia's hardwoods, according to the environmental and human rights NGO Global Witness, ends up as four-poster beds and fancy end tables in China.

The origins of Cambodia's current boom in illegal lumber can be traced to 1978, when a Vietnamese army crossed the border and routed the armies of the Khmer Rouge, the hardcore Communist rebels who had spent the previous four years in a fantastically bloody attempt to re-create Cambodian society from top to bottom. The Khmer Rouge fell back from the Cambodian heartland to the forested mountains by the Thai border, a region rich in gems and rare lumber. As the Vietnamese exercised power in the capital of Phnom Penh through Hun Sen, a one-eyed Khmer Rouge defector, the remaining Khmer Rouge commanders retired to the mountains, where they grew fat off illegal mining and logging.

But in 1994, the UN brokered a peace treaty between the two sides. The new state, largely built and financed by the UN, was a model of both progressive legislation and environmental protection. In 2001, the UN even succeeded in pressuring the Cambodian government to declare a nationwide ban on all industrial logging. Peasants and forest communities could still forage for materials for houses and tools, but it would now be a criminal act to log Cambodian rosewood to decorate the homes of rich foreigners.

Two men ride a motorcycle near Snuol.

And yet since then, neither logging nor land clearing has stopped. The forests that covered 75 percent of Cambodia's surface in 1970 now cover barely half. Much of Cambodia's old-growth primary forest is irretrievably gone. National Highway 7 passes fewer trees and many rougher frontier farms. And in every village, over the stilt houses and the middens of plastic water bottles melting, gazes the beneficent face of Hun Sen, still head of the Cambodian People's Party and de facto dictator. Hun Sen's face, across Cambodia's frontiers, looks down on a logging trade that operates with a staggering openness. Drive the border roads at night, and you see tree trunks piled in the backs of Korean transport trucks. In what's left of the northern forests, blocks of ruby wood go to market beneath the legs of peasant boys on motorbikes. Chinese-made passenger vans speed between Cambodia's cities with rosewood hidden under passengers' seats.

The van driver who took us east, a fine-featured, soul-patched young Khmer man who worked the route between the capital and Taing's hometown, explained the way this black market worked. He had driven the route for years when a friend passed him on to a businessman—a politician, the driver thought—who needed to move wood from the eastern forests down to his warehouses in Phnom Penh. For two years, the driver ran logs through a gauntlet of forestry police.

"How was the money?" I asked. He grimaced. Each forestry cop, looking over his load, demanded a bribe. "I eventually realized that I was just making enough money to pay my gas," he explained. So he quit: He gave the "businessman" to a friend and stopped taking his calls. Asked if he had ever been scared of being arrested by honest cops, he sniffed. "No one in Cambodia," he said, "wants to stop the logging."

But some do, or say they do. At the end of the spine-rattling ride from Tbong Khmum, we arrived in Snuol, a bustling district capital 12 miles from the Vietnamese border. Snuol is the last major town before Highway 7 crosses into Vietnam, Cambodia's richer, more powerful neighbor, and Snuol's main trading partner. Chinese toys, Vietnamese tools, and Cambodian textiles filled the town's markets. People dodged tuk-tuks and motorcycle taxis as they picked their way from restaurant to restaurant along the main drag. The rest of the streets, packed with red muck and pockmarked with puddles, turned shoes and pant cuffs the color of rust.

Snuol was also the last town that Taing had visited before he died. The place has become a hotbed of environmental reporting, as a group of self-taught and deeply compromised journalists wage a lonely war against the logging campaign. Outside the market, a middle-aged man in dusty clothes rode up on a motorbike, a weathered briefcase clutched between his feet. He was Sa Piseth, a close friend and reporting partner of Taing's. Sa rode shotgun on Taing's last expedition, which made him the last person to have seen Taing alive, aside from whoever was responsible for his death. As a couple of soldiers in camouflage eyed him, he stepped down from his bike and ushered us toward his house.

Sa Piseth, a journalist who accompanied Taing into the forest on the day he was murdered

***

Sa was a rangy, baby-faced 42-year-old in dusty business clothes. He had a gold tooth that flashed when he smiled, which was often, and lived in a well-kept split-level town house, behind which one often heard the sounds of dogs fighting. Sa rummaged around and pulled out a stack of Khmer-language broadsheets on the bed. Their title read Klommel ("watchdog"). On the yellowing paper, he pointed at grainy photos showing logs stacked on roadsides or in the backs of trucks. Sa shuffled through them while his son sat on his lap, babbling happily at us, pointing at pictures. "He wants you to know," my translator said of the little boy, "that this truck is full of trees, not vegetables."

There were more signs of the land conversion: Sa showed me photos of villages burning in advance of new agribusiness developments. He didn't have any recent pictures, he said, apologizing, because his camera had been smashed by police while he was covering a land conflict: the burning of a village in the Province of Kampong Cham, ordered by the provincial vice president. The police had tried to arrest him, he said, but the villagers had protected him, so eventually the cops let him go under the promise that he wouldn't write about it. He smiled. He hadn't kept his promise.

Like Taing, Sa was a veteran of the Royal Cambodian Armed Forces. In fact, he had gotten his start in journalism as a radio propagandist—a "soldier journalist"—in the army in the early 1990s, as the war against the Khmer Rouge was winding down. He produced radio spots to be broadcast to the rebel camps, urging their fighters to come down from the hills and go back home. He left the army in disgrace after an argument with his commander—a recurring theme in Sa's stories seemed to be how much smarter he felt he was than everyone around him and how much that annoyed them—and went back to civilian life. Like many rural Cambodians, Sa watched Phnom Penh become the sort of rapacious kleptocracy that had originally fueled the war. Though Hun Sen's UN-backed government established a fine network of progressive laws, it soon became clear that these were little more than a mask for violence and hypocrisy at the highest levels.

Even when it doesn't result in prison time, a reliance on hustling to pay the bills also leads journalists to put themselves in dangerous situations for very little money.

Take Cambodia's 2001 logging ban, for example. The same year the Hun Sen government banned logging, it created "economic land concessions," or ELCs, which leased land for rubber, cassava, or palm-oil plantations. ELCs granted leaseholders the right to sell any wood they cleared, which meant that they almost immediately became de facto logging concessions, often in primary forest that had been fraudulently certified as wasteland. When the government finally prohibited ELCs under international pressure, it simultaneously created a loophole that obviated the entire ban. And the loggers themselves, Global Witness found in a 2006 investigation, were the very people whose job it was to protect the forests: the police and the Royal Cambodian Armed Forces. In fact, cutting down valuable trees and moving them across the border was one of the army's main jobs. In 2005, Yash Ghai, then the UN's special rapporteur on Cambodia, looked over the nation's government and delivered a damning verdict: that the country's lawlessness was not a matter of state weakness or accident but intentional policy. "The deliberate rejection of the concept of a state governed by the rule of law has been central to hold on power."

Sa observed all this. And as the lands and forests of the east disappeared to loggers and encroaching plantations, he threw his support behind the political opposition of Sam Rainsy and the Cambodian National Rescue Party. But he felt this was not enough. Like many other Cambodian journalists who spoke with me, he said that it did no good to warn the authorities about illegal logging or land grabs in his area—not, after all, if they were in on it.

And then, in 2008, he hit on a solution: He would let the world know. He didn't have a gun, he said, "but I have the news. I can fight with the news." He began to hang out with a local crowd of journalists, and he would drive the backwoods with a camera and Chinese cellphone, taking pictures of land clearings. "In those days," he explained through Sinary, "most of my articles were about land grabbing. I'd criticize how it works for the powerful, who pressure people with no power. They'd present a threat to the people and take their land." But then, around 2012, he met Taing in Snuol and fell under the spell of the older, more serious man. Taing was quiet, except when drunk, when he'd rail about the loss of Cambodia's forests. And when Taing said he'd do something, Sa said, he did it.

Sa, Taing, and their fellow journalists worked as freelancers or stringers. They made a living by selling stories or tips to the regional or national Khmer dailies. They also self-published and wrote for one another's newspapers. Both were members of a loose reporting collective called Pride of the Khmer, run by a swaggering former daily reporter named Chea Lyhieng. "Other people run away from danger," Chea bragged over a chili mango and sweating glasses of iced coffee in a cafe by National Highway 7. "We run toward it." He had gotten sick of his daily newspaper, which didn't let him cover the stories he wanted, so he went freelance. Pride of the Khmer took donations from its journalists to print limited runs of broadsheets to end up on local officials' desks: a means of saying, "We are watching."


Chea Lyhieng, head of the reporting collective Pride of the Khmer

Chea and Sa's was not a media like the New York Times, or even the English-language professional Phnom Penh dailies like Cambodia Daily News or Phnom Penh Post. Cambodian media is roughly divided between the capital press—English, Khmer, government, opposition—and the anarchic network of "upcountry" journalists like Sa and Taing. Despite their camera phones, the rural journalists seem in some ways like a throwback to the early American press—or the zine movement—in which anyone with the urge and some printing money could put out his or her own newspaper.

There are about 300 newspapers registered with the government, according to the Cambodian Institute for Media Studies. The vast majority of these are published irregularly: Many are what Cambodians call "ghost newspapers," which publish infrequently or not at all. Many journalists, including Taing, were barely literate: When they worked as stringers for larger entities like Radio Free Asia or the Cambodia Democracy Foundation, they'd submit their stories as SMS tips or cameraphone pictures. While unorthodox, these reporters were at one end of a pipeline that can deliver real results. Though the laws are widely ignored and loggers are almost never arrested for logging, said Mathieu Pellerin of the Cambodian League for the Promotion and Defense of Human Rights, that doesn't mean loggers want publicity. "If it gets published," he said, "maybe he gets in trouble with his superiors. Maybe they knew he was logging but not how much he was taking—or maybe he was taking from someone he wasn't supposed to." There are consequences too, he said, to public embarrassment. "Maybe if he gets named as an illegal logger, his daughter doesn't get to go study abroad in Australia."

Throughout the developing world, environmental journalists, using the same methods as Sa and Taing, are confronting similar problems, issues that can be traced at least in part to the early 1990s, when the tropical world was caught up in a pair of revolutions. The first was political. Beginning in the early 1980s, dictatorships fell like dominos: Brazil, 1985; Guatemala, 1985; the Philippines, 1986; Paraguay, 1989; Thailand, 1992; Cambodia, 1994; Indonesia, 1998. Information ministries were abolished and licensing restrictions trashed. As newly democratic countries fought over things like the role of the judiciary or how to set up a congress, papers were launching and folding, reveling in their newfound freedom to criticize the powers that be.

One subject of their criticism, as it happened, was the second revolution: a vast transformation in land use. Virtually all of the countries listed above saw a spike in development and its dark sides: deforestation, communities chased off their land to make way for mining developments or agribusiness plantations. Over the past 20 years, this has played out in diverse yet parallel ways across the globe: Colombian paramilitaries or Malay oligarchs seizing peasant land for palm-oil plantations; Paraguayan narcos clearing forests for cattle and soy; Chinese-funded nickel mines polluting farmland in the rural Philippines.

In these new democracies—driven by internal divisions, without strong judiciaries or rule of law—local press can be, as some journalism advocates describe it, "a court of last resort." Though Cambodia's democracy is deeply flawed, it is still susceptible to both bad press and the accompanying pressure from the international community, which still pays half the country's budget—a fact that gives it great sway in Cambodia, when it can be bothered to use it. In 2011, for example, local press led to public outcry and protests over the eviction of thousands of peasants from a lake near Phnom Penh in order to build a Chinese-funded luxury housing complex—a project owned by a Cambodian senator with close links to Hun Sen. The protests—and the ensuing violent police crackdown—led the World Bank to freeze all new loans to the country for years.

Cnhaya Angkor News, a so-called ghost newspaper, known for its investigative journalism and sporadic publication schedule

***

But power, in the absence of the protection offered by true rule of law, is a dangerous thing to have. Here is just a sampling of the death count of environmental journalists in the two years before Taing's final ride: Suon Chan, a Cambodian covering illegal fishing, beaten to death; Mikhail Beketov, a Russian journalist who publicized the destruction of the Khimki Forest for the Moscow–St. Petersburg Freeway, died of injuries sustained years earlier after unknown men crushed his skull, broke his legs, and left him mangled in his front yard; Chandrika Rai, an Indian reporter who covered illegal coal mining, beaten to death in his home along with his family.

To keep themselves safe, the Snuol journalists said, they had to hustle, confronting the loggers with a mix of double-dealing and deception. Sometimes, said Sa, they would find themselves alone, deep in the woods, looking for logging camps, surrounded by armed men—soldiers—in the process of logging. When that happened, Sa said, there was a way of doing things: The soldiers would offer them money, maybe $10, a little more than they could make for an article. The deal, Sa said, was obvious: Take the money, and keep your mouth shut. This was the unspoken compact of the woods, he and others told me: A journalist could be tolerated if he or she was discrete enough to take the money and walk away.

"They don't always say anything , but they have guns," Sa said. "We don't take the money, what happens?" Taing, he said, often found himself lobbied by businessmen and soldiers not to publish, so he had a workaround: He would accept the bribe, and he would keep his promise not to publish the story. Instead, to maintain deniability, he would pass it to Sa, or another fellow journalist. Sa showed us a few stories that, he said, had originally been Taing's but had gone out under another journalist's byline. "Army Chief Gian N Jiaam Destroys the Forest," the headline read.

These journalists also said they take bribes because they simply need the money. Unlike a salaried reporter in Phnom Penh or Washington, DC, these men and women were largely working-class, poorly educated, and unsupported. Taing's wife, after all, worked in a rice farm while he was reporting. "Sometimes I have to take money from my wife to do my work," one ex-journalist had told me, explaining why he'd quit, a complaint that should resonate with freelancers everywhere. "Let us make even $500 a month," another Snuol journalist said, "and we will work 20 hours every day and not take money from anyone."

But accepting bribes, they emphasized, comes with dangers. A journalist who accepts a bribe—even under duress—leaves himself open to later charges of extortion, which means that the offer of a bribe functions as both carrot and stick. The journalist, once bought, is presumed to remain bought. According to Chea, the head of Pride of the Khmer, after Taing had reported some villagers to the forest ministry for logging, the villagers reported him for extorting "about 10,000 or 20,000 riel," or about $2 to $5, for which he spent six months in prison.

And even when it doesn't result in prison time, a reliance on hustling to pay the bills also leads journalists to put themselves in dangerous situations for very little money. One journalist, Coy Saveuth, lived a few miles from Snuol, up the muddy logging road where Taing, Sa, and the others would drive looking for the shipment of logs. That road was a major artery, journalists said, for the trade between the district chief of police, Chhonn Khoeun, and a police chief from the neighboring province, who had done well enough off the trade to buy himself a sleek black Lexus SUV.

Coy was a wiry man with a weathered brown face. When I met him, he wore dusty old slacks and a powder-blue work shirt. He lived deep in Chhonn's territory, barely scraping by within sight of the imposing two-story wooden warehouse where Chhonn was said to store shipments of valuable illegal logs in the cutting season.

On the same road where Taing was killed, a van prepares to haul away a load of illegally logged wood.

"We need to eat; we need to pay for gas," he explained. So one day he decided to take his cut. He and some friends had gone into the woods where Chief Chhonn had a cache of logs. They took pictures of it on their cellphones and went to ask him for money. Chhonn, Coy said, asked if $10 would be enough to make them go away. Coy held out for $15. Chhonn turned to his brother, there in the office with them. "He said, 'Maybe we should kill a few of them who are working here on reporting.'" Coy got mad and ratted Chhonn out to the Royal Cambodian Armed Forces, whom he led out on motorcycles to the stash of logs, Chhonn's angry brother riding alongside. At the log cache, the brother pulled a gun on Coy in front of the soldiers who had been sent to seize the lumber.

"I said, 'If you kill me, you better do it in one shot, or you're going to be in trouble,'" Coy recalled. In the end, the brother backed down, and according to Coy, in what struck me as an incredible touch, Chhonn had offered to put him on retainer—$50 a month to keep his mouth shut. "He said, 'Forgive my brother, he gets a little crazy,'" Coy said. "'Come work for me.' But I figured if I take that money, I'm working for him, and I have to protect him. So I told him no. Now when the goods arrive, he'll call and negotiate."

Sinary, my fixer, managed to talk to Chhonn only briefly, but his take on the morals of the journalists suggested that he saw them as breaking faith. "They have very bad behavior," Chhonn complained about Sa, Taing, and company. "We used to treat one another as godbrothers, and now they turn on me. To my mind, those journalists only work for their own interests; they just do it as a business."

He's not the only one who feels that way. In the capital, especially among the professional English-language journalists and Cambodian law enforcement, it is more or less dogma that the economy of the Cambodian forests has now become so full of violence and black money that everyone who works there—from loggers to cops to park guards to journalists—has been corrupted. Many believe that rural journalists like Sa and Taing are little more than extortionists, using their journalistic credentials as an excuse to blackmail loggers. The Cambodia Daily publishes frequent pieces on journalists arrested for extortion, and it is widely accepted among capital literati that the only reason that rural journalists bother to register "ghost newspapers" at all is to have a credible reason why someone should pay him or her not to publish.

Ironically, according to Marcus Hardtke, a German forestry expert who has spent decades in the country, one of the few checks on illegal logging is journalism—legitimate and corrupt alike. Reporting on the timber tycoon Try Pheap by the Phnom Penh Post and others has forced the Cambodian government to cancel a few dirty contracts. Hardtke would write later that extortion by Khmer-language journalists like Coy has reached such epidemic levels that it has actually begun to deter logging. Hardtke pointed to a plan to move a large shipment of timber from Kratie to the border, which caused "a pilgrimage of government officials and, reportedly, more than 50 journalists, all trying to get in on the deal. In the end, the transport didn't happen." Extortion of logging truck drivers by reporters has reached such a level that the Cambodian government has begun cracking down on extortionate journalists while turning a blind eye to the timber transporters themselves.

Cheam, Taing's widow

According to Bob Dietz, who monitors Asia for the Committee to Protect Journalists, which keeps a record of reporters killed in the line of duty, a corrupt journalist can still do good. "The dirty secret is that journalism practice in a lot of developing countries is abysmal," Dietz said. And, as Dietz and other internationaljournalism advocates told me, bribes can function around the world as part of the same spectrum of press coercion as arrests, beatings, and murders: a way to keep journalists quiet and wedded to the power structure. If journalists refuse to be bought off, Dietz added, "then another recourse is to shoot them."

The journalists in Snuol, however, thought they had developed a system that would keep them safe. Before their last mission, Sa explained, Taing had come to him with an idea. Taing cultivated a wide network of contacts around eastern Cambodia, paying for tips on illegal logging shipments with $2 cellphone cards. Down that logging road, his sources had said, was supposed to come a shipment of logs—23 oxcarts' worth. One journalist estimated this as more than $200,000 of wood, part of a dirty deal between Chhonn and the police chief on the other side of the river. On the night of October 13, 2014, after gathering a group of fellow journalists for safety, they drove into the woods to find it.

It was an ill-starred trip from the start. Taing and Sa rode together in Taing's car. They turned down the logging road that led to the ferry crossing at the Preak Chhlong River, passing the rice farming village and the tile-roofed storehouse where Chhonn and his brother kept their wood. Things began to go wrong almost immediately. The road was in dismal condition. Recent rains had turned it into a morass of muck and potholes. The villagers in the logging community on the far side of the river were menacing. The drunken ferryman refused them service.

And then across the river, Taing's phone rang. It was Chhonn. Sa listened to Taing talk—listened to Chhonn say that it was his wood they were after and demand that they get back now. Back in his own car on the other side of the river, Chea got the same warning, with a chilling postscript. "He said, 'I've warned you, now. That's my good deed. I'm not responsible for what happens if you stay.'"

By the time they got back across the river on another ferry, it was dark, with just enough of a moon to see by. They drove back to the small village where Coy, the journalist who had previously made a deal with Chhonn, lived in a local general store. When they pulled over to confer about what to do next, there was Coy. He was talking on his phone—to Chhonn. He looked at the journalists and rattled off their names into the phone.

Coy Saveuth, a reporter, shows a photo he took of illegal lumber.

That settled it. The journalists decided to head back. Taing's car brought up the rear. He drove carelessly, Sa said, making call after call on his cell, talking excitedly about the conversation with Chhonn, about how they now knew whose wood it was. Distracted, Taing drove the car into one of the deep potholes in the road and got stuck. The other cars continued on without them, their taillights disappearing in the dark.

As Sa and Taing struggled to free the vehicle, they saw headlights approaching. Taing stepped out to ask for help, but the car didn't stop; and in the glare of the headlights, Sa saw a black Lexus, an LX 470 SUV, with the windows open. Sa could just make out the men inside. "They looked very angry at us," he said. "Taing Try said the car belonged to the chief of police across the river. I don't know how he knew that. But everyone knew one another there. They were famous for shooting and killing, and he was famous for reporting on luxury wood."

Sa didn't want to stay there. He tried to get Taing to come with him, but Taing wouldn't leave his car. Taing asked Sa to go to the nearest village and get help. Sa refused. "I told him that I'll check and see if anyone is there. But if I don't get back, get your hammock out of the trunk and sleep in the shed by the side of the road." Telling the story, he turned to Sinary. "I really OK out there." Around midnight, Sa walked into the village where he'd left his motorbike. He got into town just in time to see the black Lexus heading toward Taing.

As he sat in his car, Taing was calling the other journalists, asking them to come tow him out of the mud, but they wouldn't do it. "He calls me just after midnight," said Chea, "but I tell him I'm almost home, and I'm not coming back. And then he said that he saw a truck with the wood about 30 yards from him. And then he turned off his phone. At about 5:30 AM, I got a call from Chhonn... that Taing Try got shot in the head."

***

There were no two ways about it: Taing's friends had left him in the woods to die. When my translator asked Sa if he regretted leaving, he was pensive. "If I was with him, I am not sure what's going to happen—if he is still alive, or we both get killed." He really had believed, he emphasized, that they were safe. "I wasn't afraid then." Recounting the story in his house in Snuol, he teared up. "Now, thinking back, I am so afraid."

The morning after Taing's death, provincial homicide police found the Lexus flipped over a little ways down the road from Taing's corpse. They arrested Ben Hieng, police chief from across the river, as well as a military policeman and a soldier. According to news accounts, all three confessed: They said they had been drinking all night, had run into Taing early in the morning, and there had been an altercation. When Sinary called Py Khum Pao, a Kratie homicide detective, he refused to speculate on whether Taing was killed for reporting on timber. "I do not know if the suspects are timber traders or not. On that day, they were driving in the area, and they did not have any business being there."

Coy points to the location where police found Taing's body. Photo by the author

The journalists, of course, say that it was precisely business that Ben and Chhonn had going on that night. Sinary pressed Detective Py on whether the murder had been related to Taing's work. Perhaps, he said, it had been a personal matter that had brought them together on that road. "Maybe the victim and the suspects know one another before. The area was so quiet and dangerous during the night—why would the victim want to go there, and why wasn't he scared of any robber?" Was it possible, Sinary pressed, that Taing had threatened to report the three for logging? Py wouldn't play that game. "As the victim was killed, we cannot confirm this." Dead men, in other words, tell no tales.

Two weeks after his death, I rode with the journalists to check out the scene of the crime. We drove down the logging track, past a pile of ruby logs loaded into the back of a van, to the ferry crossing. All the way, the journalists complained about how it didn't matter what they did: The authorities themselves were too interested in harvesting wood to want to stop anyone else. And yet there was a strange ecstasy in their stories. "We're like a barb in the eyes of the authorities and the businessmen," said Chea. Coy, the extortionist, was even more emphatic. "I love for my ideals," he said. "If someone is logging illegally we'll report on them, and we don't care how powerful or important they are." And at that moment, beside the river, the adrenaline coursing through my own veins, I could see the joy on Coy's face as he recounted the time he had faced down the district's top gunman. Perhaps that was what it came down to for them: Like deep-sea fishing in Alaska or logging itself in the Pacific Northwest, the rural Cambodian logging beat is the kind of job that seduces men, that brings you to life precisely because it may kill you. That, perhaps, and because in a society as unequal as rural Cambodia's, it gave men like Sa and Coy a way to have the warlords take them seriously.

Out there by the river, Coy's phone rang. Chhonn. We all froze, in the manner of monkeys who have seen a tiger, as Coy argued in Khmer, a strange light in his eyes. At last he spat something into the phone and hung up. "He's threatening me," he said. He walked down to the Preak Chhlong and dipped his feet in the muddy water. "But if I'm going to die one day like Taing Try," he said, "I'd be proud of myself and what I'm doing as a journalist here. I'd be famous outside my country." He saddled up his motorbike, and we headed back.

As we neared the road, splashing through the mud puddles, the van full of logs closed in behind us. For a sickening second, I thought it would run us off the narrow logging road, but it swerved wide of us and turned right at the highway, heading toward Vietnam. We turned the other way, en route to Snuol. On the other side of the highway, I watched a skinny dog trying to time a dash to the other side. He bet wrong, sprinting directly under the wheels of a big transport truck heading down one of the lanes. I watched as he disappeared under the truck, turning over and over. And then the truck was gone, and he was up and running, yelping, for the cover of the trees.

This story appeared in the September issue of VICE magazine. Click HERE to subscribe.


A Definitive Ranking of US Presidents from Lamest to Coolest

$
0
0

In January, a new president will be inaugurated, and Barack Obama will step down, ending one of the most remarkable runs in American history: For eight years, the US had a cool president.

Now, by "cool," I don't necessary mean "good"—a big part of growing up is learning to tell the difference. Sometimes good people are cool, like Jesus Christ. Sometimes, though, good people are uncool, like most of the dads in old sitcoms. Most confusingly, bad people are sometimes cool, like most characters in Mafia movies.

So without saying anything about Barack Obama's policies, we should be able to say that he is, in fact, cool, the kind of guy who can be a relaxed and natural guest on a late-night show and who kills flies with his bare hands. In fact, he was attacked by a Karl Rove–backed group for being too cool before the 2012 election. That's how cool he is.

But was Obama the coolest president? Who was the least cool president? Who was the 27th coolest president? To answer these questions and more, I made a very scientific list. These rankings don't necessarily reflect their policies or the horrible, racist things they may have done—these are just about coolness, and coolness doesn't care about right and wrong.

43. John Tyler, 1841–1845

John Tyler was a slaveholder who sided with the Confederacy in the Civil War. His name lives on in John Tyler High School in Tyler, Texas, where 40 percent of the students are black. Being the victim of historical irony is never, ever cool.

42. Franklin Pierce, 1853–1857

Franklin Pierce's whole life seems like a bummer. His wife was always sick with tuberculosis, he saw his son get crushed to death and nearly decapitated by a train, he was on the wrong side of everything (for example, he hated Lincoln), and he drank himself to death.

Rutherford B. Hayes, in case anyone cares what he looks like

41. Rutherford B Hayes, 1877–1881

Rutherford B Hayes banned alcohol from the White House because he wanted Prohibitionists to like him.

40. James Buchanan, 1857–1861

James Buchanan is most famous for being the only president to never get married (sorta cool?), and for failing to prevent the Civil War (not cool).

39. Andrew Johnson, 1865–1869

Lincoln's second VP was supposed to be killed in the plot that ended Lincoln's life, but his assassin got drunk instead of killing him. Johnson, like most presidents from the mid-19th century not named Lincoln, is barely remembered today. He stands out for making his own suits, feeding mice that he found, and showing up at random church services. Huh.

38. Chester A Arthur, 1881–1885

There are a lot of boring presidents, and chief among them is Chester
"A" Arthur. Even this list of "interesting" Chester Arthur facts is forced to note that he was the member of a salmon club, whatever that is. One of his final recorded statements is that, "After all, life is not worth living." On one hand, nihilism is almost always badass, but on the other—you just lived a whole life, joke's on you! What a chump.

Benjamin Harrison, doing his thing, which is being boring and uncool

37. Benjamin Harrison, 1889–1893

When Benjamin Harrison was 62, he married a woman who was young enough to be his daughter, but she was just his wife's niece.

36. Harry S Truman, 1945–1953

The most famous thing about Truman—other than him ordering the only uses of nuclear weapons against humans in history—is that he almost lost an election, and a newspaper got the result wrong. Look at this picture of him holding the paper and gloating like a herb. Act like you've been there before, dude.

35. Thomas Jefferson, 1801–1809

He wrote the Declaration of Independence when he was 33! Whatever. He also owned hundreds of slaves and raped some of them, even though his writings indicated that he thought the slave trade was wrong—in other words, he was philosophically dedicated to the idea of freedom but not when it interfered with his luxurious lifestyle. In short, fuck Thomas Jefferson. He's only this high because he's responsible for the Louisiana Purchase, so without him we wouldn't have New Orleans, the First City of Jazz ™.

34. William Henry Harrison, 1841

William Henry Harrison died of pneumonia a month after taking office—which developed out of a cold he caught giving a super long inaugural address that no one could actually hear because microphones didn't exist yet. Boo!

This guy

33. George W Bush, 2001–2009

Somehow George W Bush gained the reputation of being a down-to-earth guy voters "wanted to have a beer with," even though he was a recovering alcoholic, and if you have ever had a beer with a recovering alcoholic, you know that's a bad, bad idea. If George W Bush were really cool, he wouldn't be painting naïve self-portraits. He'd be into AbEx.

32. Warren G Harding 1921–1923

When a rapper names himself after you, you are obviously a bit cooler as a result, but Warren G Harding's reputation has suffered from the Teapot Dome scandal (not as interesting as it sounds) and from basically fucking everything that moved.

31. Herbert Hoover, 1929–1933

Herbert Hoover was president during the Great Depression (not cool) and the last years of prohibition, which he supported (also not cool). On the other hand, he translated a book with the heavy metal title, De Re Metallica, and "was an orphan whose first job was picking bugs off potato plants, for which he was paid a dollar per hundred bugs."

30. Grover Cleveland, 1885–1889 and 1893–1897

Grover Cleveland is the only president to serve two nonconsecutive terms, which is a cool fact to know if you are yourself lame. He briefly worked as a hangman, which makes him one of the only presidents who definitely personally killed someone.

29. James A Garfield, 1881

When your legacy is "got killed less than a year after becoming president," you aren't very cool, sorry :(

28. Ulysses S Grant, 1869–1877

Ulysses S Grant has a complicated legacy, and I am not gonna get into all that. But he reportedly drank a lot while winning the Civil War, which basically makes him the star of an HBO drama. Gritty!

27 Ronald Reagan, 1981–1989

Ronald Reagan may have been the "Best Thing That Ever Happened to Punk Rock" according to this very website, but that was basically because he looked like the cartoon idea of what punks were supposed to hate. Conservatives may try to tell you Reagan is cool, but they are not exactly authorities on the subject. Also never forget he started his career in politics as an FBI snitch in Hollywood.

Andrew Jackson had a weirdly long face, if you ask me.

26. Andrew Jackson, 1829–1837

Andrew Jackson is one of the most important people in US history, a vicious racist responsible for some of the worst atrocities against Native Americans, a duelist and war hero who lived with a bullet inside him for years, the first politician to ride populism to the White House. I have no idea where to put him on this list, so I put him here.

25. Woodrow Wilson 1913–1921

Woodrow Wilson was also a huge racist (yes, they all were, but he was bad even for his time). His wife also basically ran his administration after he had a strokeis that cool? Sure.

24. George Bush, 1989–1993

He's a war hero, sure, and the episode of The Simpsons making fun of him was great, but he's also one of the blue-bloodiest dudes to sit in the Oval Office. And remember, that Simpsons episode came about because he hated to show.

23. Richard Nixon, 1969–1974

I know it's technically wrong to view Nixon as a comic villain instead of a paranoid, drunken anti-Semite who enabled Henry Kissinger to commit war crimes in Cambodia. But if you just focus on Watergate, that photo of him making the V sign after resigning, and blaming the Vietnam war on the French, Nixon is not without a certain charm.

Teddy Roosevelt looked like a cartoon version of himself.

22. Theodore Roosevelt, 1901–1909

Teddy Roosevelt's macho schtick is pretty tiring, but without his Rough Riders, we'd never have DMX's "Ruff Ryders' Anthem," the second best musical anthem (behind "Int'l Player's Anthem").

21. Dwight D Eisenhower, 1953–1961

Warning about the "military-industrial complex" makes him cool in a darkly prophetic sort of way, and the whole "defeating Hitler" thing was good. Not as cool: being named "Dwight," supporting coups, presiding over the mass deportation effort dubbed "Operation Wetback."

20. William Taft, 1909–1913

Legend has it that Taft, America's girthiest president, once got stuck in a bathtub. Some people say this rumor is untrue, but have you ever heard a story of someone getting stuck in a bathtub about someone who hadn't actually gotten stuck in a bathtub? The whole incident is cool in a fat-guy way.

19. James K Polk, 1845–1849

The most interesting thing about Polk is that, as a teen, he had surgery to remove bladder stones with no anesthetic except brandy.

18. John Adams, 1797–1801

By becoming president first, John Adams tried to ensure that his son John Quincy could never top his old man. Classic cool dad move.


Marty Van Buren, what a guy!

17. Martin Van Buren, 1837–1841

Martin Van Buren married his cousin and tried to keep Texas out of the union. He's also the namesake for the "Van Buren Boys," an episode of Seinfeld about a gang named after the former president. ("They're just as mean as he was.") It's a wash.

16. James Monroe, 1817–1825

Fuck, forgot about Monroe. OK, this spot is as good as any for him.

15. George Washington, 1789–1797

George Washington pretty much drew the blueprint for how a president should be (war hero, tall, easily rendered through shading). The Beatles of presidents—not hip, exactly, but no one is going to talk shit about Washington.

14. James Madison, 1809–1817

James Madison is known as the "Father of the Constitution" and part of the team (with Alexander Hamilton) behind the Federalist Papers, giving hope to every manifesto writer than one day their blue-background-yellow-letter website will become the foundation of a system of government. He was also reportedly very short, which is cool. People like short guys.

13. Zachary Taylor, 1849–1850

For 16 months in the tumultuous years leading up to the Civil War, America had a president named Zachary. President Zach.

12. John Quincy Adams, 1825–1829

For the son of a president, John Quincy Adams seems like a pretty well-rounded guy. He taught at Harvard, served as our first ambassador to Russia, and was against slavery. According to Wikipedia, which, eh, is probably right, he's the first president to have his photo taken, to cut his hair short, and to wear pants instead of culottes—three cool milestones.

11. Millard Fillmore 1850–1853

"Millard Fillmore" sounds like an actor from one of those old pornos where everyone's hairy and the blowjobs look like a slide whistle tutorial.

10. William McKinley, 1897–1901

Getting murdered by an anarchist is definitely cool.

9. Bill Clinton, 1993–2001

I know. But on the other hand:

8. Gerald Ford, 1974–1977

Bumbling into the presidency after replacing first VP Spiro Agnew and then Nixon, Ford isn't traditionally regarded as "cool"; Chevy Chase's Saturday Night Live impression of him as a klutz remains basically the only thing we remember him for. But Ford was totally relaxed about that joke. And, uh, young Gerald Ford could kinda get it?

7. Lyndon B Johnson, 1963–1969

LBJ was fond on pulling his dick out in front of people and asking "Have you ever seen anything as big as this?" Vietnam was an unequivocal disaster, but it's arguably not totally his fault and "Hey hey/ LBJ/ How many kids did you kill today?" is easily one of the greatest chants ever. Johnson would never be mistaken for a nice man or even a decent one, but his legendary ability to intimidate others makes him the Tony Soprano of this list.

6. Franklin D. Roosevelt, 1933–1945

Forget the New Deal and World War II for a second—FDR made cigarette holders stylish long before Audrey Hepburn and Hunter S Thompson.

5. Jimmy Carter, 1977–1981

Jimmy Carter, a peanut farmer and devout Christian, gets a lot of cool points for making his famous "hey guys this shit kinda sucks" speech, aka the "malaise" speech, a pretty bold move. Mainly, he's this high up because his daughter Amy added the Sex Pistols and Ramones to the White House record collection.

4. Calvin Coolidge, 1923–1929

Look, Great Depression great shshmession, you can't argue with a name like that.

3. Abraham Lincoln, 1861–1865

Abraham Lincoln freed the slaves, was tall and depressed (glamorizing depression is not cool but let's not deny that, historically, depression and coolness have gone hand in hand), and his first vice president was named Hannibal. His line, "As a nation of free men, we will live forever or die by suicide," is the most badass thing anyone's ever written about America and a hell of an intro for a rock song.

2. John F Kennedy, 1961–1963

JFK's coolness is undeniable. He was young, hot, promiscuous, maybe an amphetamine addict, wore hip sunglasses, died tragically, and the head of a family of liberal heroes/terrible fuckups. He would be number one on this list except for...

1. Barack Obama, 2009–2016

Of course, Barack Obama is the coolest president. It's not even close. Obviously being the first black president is cool, but there's so much beyond that. He spent his formative years in Hawaii, the coolest state. He hung out with a group of pot smokers called the Choom Gang and did "maybe a little blow." (Wink, wink.) Look at his Summer 2016 Nighttime playlist: This is a guy who doesn't just have sex, he fucks. Check out this picture of him dressed in athleisure and standing in front of a sign that just says "69." Compare him to this video of our next president awkwardly dancing on Ellen. You can (and should) be upset about with the NSA and the failure to close Guantánamo and drone strikes and lots of other things, but come on: He's a cool guy.

Follow Hanson O'Haver on Twitter.

The 'Sensible Soccer' World Cup Is an eSport Event Like No Other

$
0
0

All photographs by sensiblesoccer.de/Rick Lindkeman, published with kind permission

The words "Sensible Soccer" are enough to evoke a variety of emotions in almost anyone who grew up with sports gaming in the 1990s. In particular, the Sensible World of Soccer series of games were so good that they became a pop-culture staple and took their rightful place alongside other beloved (digital and otherwise) sporting pastimes. They're far from a distant memory, and with the right amount of research, you'll find a dedicated group of fans who go to extreme lengths to satisfy their addictions. Sensible? Ha. These folks are anything but.

On a yearly basis, a passionate selection of individuals come together to partake in the Sensible Soccer World Cup, or Sensible Days as it's affectionately known. The event is held in a different location each year, and competitors use their own money to travel across Europe for the privilege of taking part. Once they arrive, any delusions of grandeur are quickly abolished. This isn't your typical eSports tournament.

Let me paint a more detailed picture. This year's event is being held in late August, in a rented house in the Netherlands, where there's an indoor noise curfew at 11 PM. Bringing your own bed linen is recommended, and the dish washing duties are a group-wide responsibility. If you're looking for the luxurious elements of the eSports scene—pampered players staying in five-star hotels, with publishers and PRs catering to their every need—you're clearly not going to find them.

Footage of the Amiga final of Sensible Days 2016

What it lacks in luxury, Sensible Days more than makes up for in spirit. There aren't any cash prizes, and that isn't to its detriment. It shares similarities with the lower reaches of the soccer pyramid, where the absence of money encourages participants to tap into their true passion for the beautiful game. This manifests itself in Sensible Days in a multitude of ways, from the inclusion of locally made trophies and medals to the development of a 32-page official tournament magazine. It's the work of pure, extraordinary dedication.

The idea of Sensible Days isn't anything new. The concept began in 2004, and 12 years later, it's as popular as ever. It's also the cornerstone of the competitive Sensi scene, which has thrived as a result of an online community located at sensiblesoccer.de. Michael Jänsch founded and co-built the site in 2001.

"I wanted to play offline Sensible World of Soccer, and I saw some former projects in Serbia or Denmark with ugly websites," he tells me. "I was a young programmer and needed practice in PHP coding, so it was perfect for that project." Nowadays, the site is used to host both offline and online competitions.

Numerous community members manage the Sensible Days. Rick Lindeman and Colin Roll are the official tournament organizers of Sensible Days 2016. ". We needed a place where we could bring our own beer, too."

Roll is a native of England—the birthplace of the Sensible Soccer series. The English have traditionally suffered from a lack of representation at the event, which Roll hopes to rectify in the future. "The game was born and bred in England," he says. "My best finish has been a quarter-final spot. I'm longing for someone to break my record."

Article continues after the video below

Related: Watch VICE Gaming's film on the (rather different) competitive gaming world of 'Smite'

Whether the English get a look-in or not, he's optimistic that the event will continue to go from strength to strength. "I think we have a bright future. The game has a massive off and online following in countries like Poland, Denmark, Italy, and Germany. We keep seeing new members at our sites; we keep seeing new likes at our Facebook page. I'm proud to be part of an ever-growing community."

But why Sensible Soccer? Why not FIFA or Pro Evo? "It was the game of my youth," says Rafal Nossek, veteran of the Sensible Days scene. "It is still the most enjoyable football simulation by miles. Another factor was an overwhelming players, clubs, and federation database that been included in the game. You could start your career in pretty much every league in the world. It was an unprecedented effort."

Fellow attendees echo similar thoughts. "I remember the game from my childhood," says competitor Andreas Ibsen. "I play FIFA from time to time, but the gameplay is just better in Sensible World of Soccer, in my opinion."

By this point, the game itself isn't necessarily the tournament's biggest draw. Almost every interviewee makes a point of telling me how close-knit the atmosphere at Sensible Days can be. Five-time Sensible Days PC champion Philipp Habermann is one of them. "On an average Sensible Days tournament, I spend about €220 . Good friends having a great time together is worth spending that amount." He'd know—he's spent a total of more than $2,245 in tournament costs over the years.

This year's Sensible Days is a weekend-long affair, with the focus on the PC and Amiga versions of Sensible World of Soccer. "There is always a bit of war between the formats," Lindeman tells me. Regardless, it works in the way you'd expect. A real-life draw takes place ahead of the virtual kick-off. Those who advance from the initial group stages compete in knockout rounds, and the eventual victors are rewarded for their efforts with elegant medals and trophies.

As this year's results roll in, I get word that Polish superstar Błażej Urbanek has done the unthinkable, winning three competitions in all. Habermann, on the other hand, adds to his list of accolades with victory in the Xbox event. Other highlights of the weekend include an almost everlasting penalty shootout, an appearance from original Sensi designer Jon Hare's new Sociable Soccer game, and some of the finest catering the tournament has ever seen.

When it's all over, there's time for one last beer until the CRT monitors, and Amiga joysticks are packed away for another year. History will forever document the victors of the Sensible Soccer World Cup, but it's the lasting memories that will keep these fans coming back for more.

Follow Fraser Gilbert on Twitter.

Read more gaming articles on VICE. Follow VICE Gaming on Twitter, and why not like us on Facebook, too. If you like.

Photos of Trekkies Celebrating 50 Years of the 23rd Century

$
0
0

This past weekend, New York hosted Star Trek: Mission New York, a convention celebrating the most influential sci-fi franchise of television history. The occasion was the 50th anniversary of the original (and still best) series, and there were a load of panels and exhibits and junk, but mainly this seemed to be a chance for Trekkies/Trekkers of all stripes and forehead ridges to see their people. VICE sent photographer Maggie Shannon to cover the event, and she came back with Tribble-filled wonder, Scotty lookalikes, and at least five Khans.

Maggie Shannon is a photographer based in NYC. You can follow her work here.

'Better Things' Is More Than a Female 'Louie'

$
0
0

Sam Fox has a lot of things to carry. The single mother of three, played by Pamela Adlon in the new semi-autobiographical FX show Better Things, is seen dragging enormous trash bins, struggling with a cooler half her size on the sidelines of a soccer game, and, in another scene, carrying a chair around her house in an attempt to locate and disable a blaring smoke alarm.

In one of the best moments I've seen on television, Sam is stopped repeatedly by her mother, who lives across the street, as she lugs a large suitcase up her driveway. Sam has just returned from filming in Canada and is exhausted. Frustrated, she sends her mother away before going inside her own home, which she discovers is completely trashed. Her oldest daughter, Max, has thrown a party while she was away and the two younger daughters, Frankie and Duke, have done their own damage to the kitchen.

Desperate for a nap, Sam instead puts her mother on speakerphone and begins to clean. In this quiet moment, the show announces just what it has to offer: an incredibly subtle, layered, and nuanced approach to depicting familial love. In the cleaning montage that follows, Sam's face, movements, and terse but tender remarks to her mother form a tableau depicting just how many emotions—hurt, obligation, resentment, frustration—can be contained within love.

"This is the way my family engages," Adlon recently told VICE from her home in Los Angeles. "It is sometimes difficult for me to be around my mom, and sometimes it is difficult for my daughters to be around me. There could be a huge tsunami of emotion, and then we could be like, 'Let's just all go to dinner.' That's the way life is. Big fucking gnarly things happen, and then you just move on. When you love people, you love them, and you're allowed to make mistakes."

Better Things is, in part, a result of a long-held artistic partnership between Adlon and comedian Louis CK, who is credited as a writer, director, and co-creator of the series. They first starred together a decade ago as husband and wife on HBO's Lucky Louie and have remained involved creatively ever since. Perhaps because of this, it will be tempting for people to draw comparisons between Better Things and CK's own FX show Louie, for which Adlon also writes, produces, and holds a recurrent role as Pamela, Louie's friend and sometimes love interest. Unfortunately, too many of these comparisons will serve to reduce both shows by dubbing Better Things a West Coast Louie for ladies. A more apt resemblance is found in the subtle and restrained ethos behind the writing and acting both shows prefer.

"I really want to keep things authentic and real-feeling," Adlon explained. "And so the way I write and the way Louis writes and when we write together—it's really anathema to us to over-explain. Every time I'd get a new actor on my show—I respect actors so much—I'd say, 'Keep it simple and don't worry. Let real moments happen. Let pauses lay there, and don't look for what's not there. It's all there on the page.'"

Like Louie, Better Things excels at letting a moment or single line of dialogue speak both to the scene and simultaneously to a larger, often political context. "I think about things on a bigger scale all the time in my life," said Adlon. "I'm fully engaged in my life in the present, but I really look at everything observationally, and that's what I hope is portrayed."


Mikey Madison as Max and Pamela Adlon as Sam. Photo by Colleen Hayes/courtesy of FX

In one scene, Sam is accused by her daughter Max of only working to become famous, the implication being that fame is more important to Sam than her time spent with her children. Sam says, simply, "This is so unfair that I think I'm going to pass out." In the briefest of pauses before and after Adlon says her line, it is impossible not to feel how deeply such a sense of unfairness is felt. "When I watch that scene down in editing, I am struck every time," said Adlon. "I'm not making this a soapbox for single moms and feminism. I didn't set out to make a feminist show, but I think it very much is. It is a human show. I feel that scene can be relatable to so many people. It doesn't have to be just about a mother and a daughter—it's about the exchange of these hard truths and processing them."

The hard truths uttered are not limited to what is happening between the two characters on the screen. We know it is unlikely that similar accusations are being hurled at Max's absent father, and we are reminded that when it comes to parenting, the pressures and expectations are not placed on genders equally. "I really want to talk about gender and aging and racism," Adlon acknowledged. "But then just talk about regular, boring life. It's a show about a bunch of people. It's the layers of real, everyday life."

What should not be left unsaid is that this scene and the show as a whole is very funny. But the humor does more than entertain—it forms the philosophical core. In Adlon's hands, these moments—single interactions, even single sentences uttered in an argument—have the ability to compress a range of emotions and ideas relevant to both the personal and political self. Her masterful portrayal of these moments forces them to expand and display just how much complexity is contained within our mundane, everyday lives. It's a heavy task, but Adlon, like her character, bears it well.

Follow Chloé Cooper Jones on Twitter.

Better Things premieres Thursday, September 8 on FX.

​Is There Room for Couch Co-Op in a World Obsessed with Online Multiplayer?

$
0
0

Images courtesy of Ghost Town Games.

Get the VICE App on iOS and Android

My first memory of games, like so many other people's, is playing with my family. I remember hiding behind pillows as I watched my mother play Super Punch Out!!. Or when I introduced my father to Wii Sports, the only game he ever learned to play, let alone asked to play with me. Whether in bars, malls, arcades, or living rooms, games have always been meant to be shared with others.

But with the help of the internet, games no longer need to be a communal experience in a single space. Recording video footage of someone playing through a game, known as Let's Plays, has only been amplified due to platforms such as Twitch, which allows players to stream their playthrough to an active audience. Friends in different rooms or countries can now play games together. The prevalence of online connectivity created a rise in online multiplayer games; games like World of Warcraft and Overwatch forgo the need for a couch and a television screen split to accommodate multiple players. Games with local multiplayer—that is, ones that provide no online capabilities to play with others worldwide—are therefore seen as obsolete to the gamer accustomed to the pleasure of the internet. So how does a local multiplayer game fare in a world obsessed with connecting with multiple people at once?

If Overcooked is any indication, then it proves local co-op games are still a necessity. Fun can still be had in a single room, for both game enthusiasts and the uninterested alike. Simple in nature, Overcooked, by Ghost Town Games, is a co-op game about cooking specific recipes in a certain amount of time. From onion soup to chicken burritos, players will scramble to chop vegetables or grab cooked meat before it burns on the stove. The crux of the game lies in its wacky level design. Players are not just cooking in a kitchen, but sometimes on moving trucks, swaying boats, or outer space. The chaos of the kitchen is paired with the cooperation needed to succeed.

The game has unanimously been praised for its disorderly fun and has been lauded as a couch co-op game everyone needs to play. But not everyone is impressed with Overcooked: A commonly referenced sticking point (even among positive reviews) is the game's lack of online multiplayer.

On Overcooked's Steam forum, the Ghost Town Games created a thread title "Multiplayer Megathread" meant to "discuss online multiplayer" and give the team feedback for the game. The thread features many posts explaining why players refuse to buy the game until online multiplayer is implemented. One large post by a user named Apothecarrion titled "why couch co-op is dead and why this game should be online" details why they believe Overcooked will fail without it: "Outside of people within the gaming industry in some way, most people in adult life just dont have friends that want to play indie games when they are over at someone's house for a house party. It is like pulling teeth."

Regardless of whether or not online multiplayer is added to Overcooked, the outcry for online multiplayer reminds us that couch co-op games are not dead and hopefully never will be. Games should always ask us for intimacy; something is missed when not experienced together in one room.

Will some players miss the opportunity to play with friends who may live across states or countries? Of course. But perhaps there is an untouched group of people who will benefit from a simple game that requires no internet connection. "Don't get me wrong, I love online multiplayer too," wrote Phil Duncan, co-founder of Ghost Town Games, over email, "but I think local multiplayer games offer a completely different experience to playing over the internet: The dynamic with our game is much more about taking people who are together in the same location, who want to share moments together and using local co-op to amplify that experience, to celebrate being together basically."

There is always room for intimacy, for sharing a couch and a laugh with person by our side.

Overcooked is in itself its own form of nostalgia. It takes me back to playing with friends huddled around a console because there was no other choice. As we praise the resurgence of collect-a-thon games thanks to Yooka-Laylee, or remastered versions of older games like Crash Bandicoot or Final Fantasy 7, we should also cheer for the games that pull us to the living room, playing with whoever would pick up the second controller.

Overcooked is in no way the first or last game to play with an emphasis on working together locally. For example, look at Bounden, a dance game created by Game Oven and choreographed by the Dutch National Ballet. Two players take opposite ends of a smart phone and move the phone to follow a string of rings on the screen. The movement of the phone forces the two players to move, as if dancing. Obviously, there is no online multiplayer for Bounden; partners must crowd a small screen, and trust themselves, their partners, and the phone to lead them to dance victory. Or consider the success of Pokémon Go, which has gotten thousands of players to explore their own neighborhoods or cities just to collect fictional Pokémon. There is something satisfying in knowing these discoveries, dancing, Pokémon catching, can be done with a loved one or stranger standing right next to you.

So few games still provide local co-op at all, so if anything, we should be encouraging more of it. Duncan noted that he hopes more developers explore local co-op functionality." I think there's a lot of people out there who want to play them (myself included) since they offer a truly unique and above all fun social experience." Even in a society dependent on the internet, online connectivity's appeal is still not an absolute. Nor is it still a necessary item for enjoying games. To doubt Overcooked's success is to ignore games' history with connecting communities together, both online and offline.

The internet is so embedded into our culture that it feels almost sacrilegious to ask for games that do not require it, but having games that are strictly local co-op is a reminder to occasionally remove ourselves from online spaces. There is always room for intimacy, for sharing a couch and a laugh with person by our side. Overcooked encourages those outside of the gaming world to experiment without the fear of online vitriol. What better way to play a game than with a loved one, a trusted friend, or even a stranger at a party? I don't want my memories of introducing my father to Wii Sports to be to be a distant memory. I want to always hear more stories like it. Overcooked and other couch co-op games like it will ensure that.

Follow Shonté Daniels on Twitter.

Read more gaming articles on VICE here, and follow VICE Gaming on Twitter at @VICEGaming.

Viewing all 38002 articles
Browse latest View live




Latest Images